SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
399 <strong>Mass</strong>. 17, 21 n.5 (1987). In Gallarelli, the Court<br />
held that a request for all 'police reports and<br />
scientific reports" was sufficient to cover relevant<br />
laboratory reports. a. at 21-22. When the prosecutor<br />
fails to turn over exculpatory information which had been<br />
specifically requested, the court "must set aside the<br />
verdict unless it is sure that the error 'did not<br />
influence the jury or had but a very slight effect."'<br />
'Commonwealth v. Lykus, 451 <strong>Mass</strong>. 310, 326 (2008)<br />
4. Constitutional right to fair trial based<br />
on reliable evidence.<br />
A defendant's right to due process under the Fifth<br />
and Fourteenth Amendments protects him from conviction<br />
based on unreliable evidence. California v. Green, 399<br />
U.S. 149, 188 n.20 (1970). That due process guarantee may<br />
require a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence.<br />
In Cooqan v. McCauqhtry, 958 F.2d 793, 801 (7th Cir.<br />
1991), the court wrote:<br />
In some situations newly-discovered evidence<br />
is so compelling that it would be a violation<br />
of the fundamental fairness embodied in the<br />
Due Process Clause not to afford a defendant a<br />
new trial at which the evidence could be<br />
Considered.<br />
In the recantation context, fundamental fairness may<br />
require a new trial, even in the absence of bad faith.<br />
United States v. Younq, 17 F.3d 1201,1203 (9th Cir. 1994) .<br />
29