20.07.2013 Views

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT DIRK GKEINEDER - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

399 <strong>Mass</strong>. 17, 21 n.5 (1987). In Gallarelli, the Court<br />

held that a request for all 'police reports and<br />

scientific reports" was sufficient to cover relevant<br />

laboratory reports. a. at 21-22. When the prosecutor<br />

fails to turn over exculpatory information which had been<br />

specifically requested, the court "must set aside the<br />

verdict unless it is sure that the error 'did not<br />

influence the jury or had but a very slight effect."'<br />

'Commonwealth v. Lykus, 451 <strong>Mass</strong>. 310, 326 (2008)<br />

4. Constitutional right to fair trial based<br />

on reliable evidence.<br />

A defendant's right to due process under the Fifth<br />

and Fourteenth Amendments protects him from conviction<br />

based on unreliable evidence. California v. Green, 399<br />

U.S. 149, 188 n.20 (1970). That due process guarantee may<br />

require a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence.<br />

In Cooqan v. McCauqhtry, 958 F.2d 793, 801 (7th Cir.<br />

1991), the court wrote:<br />

In some situations newly-discovered evidence<br />

is so compelling that it would be a violation<br />

of the fundamental fairness embodied in the<br />

Due Process Clause not to afford a defendant a<br />

new trial at which the evidence could be<br />

Considered.<br />

In the recantation context, fundamental fairness may<br />

require a new trial, even in the absence of bad faith.<br />

United States v. Younq, 17 F.3d 1201,1203 (9th Cir. 1994) .<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!