for Suffolk County - Mass Cases

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EEOC V. Waffle House, InC., 122 s. Ct. 754 (20021 Feeney ,v. Dell, 454 Mass. 192 (2009) Garrity v. New Jersey, 87 5. Ct. 616 (1967) - -. Gilmcr v. Xnterstate/Johnson Lane Cork, 111 S. Ct. 1647 (1991) Hospital Cristo Redentor, Inc. v. NLRB, 488 F. 3d 513 (lSt Cir. 2007) In re Mohawk Greenfield Motel C o p , 239 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Mass, 1999) Joule, Inc. v. Simmons, Order on Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce an Arbitration Agreement Under Federal Arbitration Act and Massachusetts Arbitration Act, C.A. No. 09-4920, Suffolk ss., Troy, J., January 7, 2010 Kraft v. Police Comm'r, 410 Mass. 155 (1991) Lynn Teachers Union, Local ~" LO37 v. .- MUD, 406 Mass. 515 (1990) passim passim 38 46 38 16, 21 Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp., -.x 402 F.3d 1 (19t Cir. 2005) 14, 26, 28, 41 Mass. Bar Association, Inc. v. Wellington and MCAD, Memorandum of Decision and Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider, C.A. No. SUCV2009-1257 €1, June 16, 2009 24 Massachusetts Bay Transp. Auth. v. Boston Carmen's Union, Local - 589, 545 M&. 19 (2009) - - Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, 115 s. Ct. 3.212 (1995) McCarthy v. Azure, 22 F.3d 351 (1st Cir. 1994) 47 Melnychenko v. 84 Lumber Co., 424 Mass. 285 (1997) 41 Miller v. Cotter, 448 Mass. 671 (2007) 40 iv 23 44 32 15 46
Navarro v. Pfizer Corp., 261 F.3d 90, 95ylst Ci;. 2001) NLRB v. Horizons Hotel Corp., -I 49 F.3d 795, 804 (ISt bir. 1995) NLRB v. Marine Optical, Inc. 671 F.2d 11 (lSt Cir. 1982) r NLRB v. Reed & Prince Mfg.Co. .-< 118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941) NLRB v. Vernitron Elec. Components, Inc., 548 F.2d 24 (1st C ir. 19'77) Preston v. Ferrs, 128 S. Ct. 978 (2008) Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 2010 U.S. Lexis 4891 (June 21, 2010) Skirchak v. Dynamics - Research Corp., 508 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2007) - St. Fleur v. WPI Cable Sys./Mutron, 450 Mass. 345 (2008) Stirlcn v. Supercuts, Inc., 60 Cal.Rptr. 2d 138 (Cal. App. 1 D ist. 1997) -_ Stonehill College v. MCAD, 441 Mass. 549, cert. denied sub nom. -. Wilfcrt Bros. Realty Co. v. MCAD, 543 U.S. 979 (2004) - Thomas v. ED1 Specialists, I-nL, 437,Mass. 536 (2002) Thurdin v. SEI Boston, LLC, -. 452 Mass. 436 (2008) United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, -I Inc. 517 F.2d 826 (5th Ci.r. 1975), cere. denied 425 U.S. 944 (1976) I Volt Info. Sci., Inc. v. Ed. of Tr. of Leland Stanford, 109 S. Ct'i 1248 (1989) I "_ V 42 42 38 39 38 10-11, 20-1 P 3 1. 20 ssi 44 passim 17, 23 16 45 46 n
Page 1: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPRE
Page 4 and 5: - 11. MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC POLICY I
Page 8 and 9: Wal.ker v. Lakewood, 272 F.3d 1114
Page 10 and 11: 1. STATEMENT OF ISSUES siyned by th
Page 12 and 13: STATEMENT OF TAE CASE MELA adopts D
Page 14 and 15: undermining the many cases pursued
Page 16 and 17: ARmJmwr The Massachusetts Employmen
Page 18 and 19: MCAD to enforce the law and rectify
Page 20 and 21: Labor Comissioner serves simply as
Page 22 and 23: The Supreme Court held that the arb
Page 24 and 25: The MUD was established to enforce
Page 26 and 27: If the private parties agree to res
Page 28 and 29: case in suppori of the Complainant,
Page 30 and 31: Stonehill College, 141 Mass. at. 56
Page 32 and 33: comprehensive scheme to combat disc
Page 34 and 35: een imposed? Or otherwise assure th
Page 36 and 37: G. JOULE'S OTHER ARGUMENTS ARE OFF-
Page 38 and 39: to create a stumbling block. The tr
Page 40 and 41: Moreover, the MCAD wrote in its ami
Page 42 and 43: and remedy violations of the statut
Page 44 and 45: up the substantial right to seek ad
Page 46 and 47: 2. The Threat To Reject. Simmons' F
Page 48 and 49: Components, Inc., 548 F.2d 24, 26 (
Page 50 and 51: nursing home contract was ruled enf
Page 52 and 53: When an employer says, "waive your
Page 54 and 55: Vokovich, 720 F.2d 909, 925 (8th Ci
Page 56 and 57:
coerced"). It is up to state law to
show all

for Suffolk County - Mass Cases

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?