for Suffolk County - Mass Cases
for Suffolk County - Mass Cases
for Suffolk County - Mass Cases
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of independent arbiter, but it may not divest the agency of<br />
its role in acting as a prosecutor to investigate<br />
violations, en<strong>for</strong>ce the law, and rectify the harm. - Id., at<br />
986-987.<br />
B. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS OF TIIE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT<br />
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ARE NOT STAYED OR DISMISSED DUE<br />
TO ARBITRATION PROVISIONS<br />
The protection of an agency's prasecutorial function<br />
finds further expression in EEOC v. Waffle House, hc., - 122<br />
S. Ct. 754 (2002), which held that a private arbitration<br />
agreement does not affect en<strong>for</strong>cement actions of the ELOC<br />
nor docs it. narrow the ranye of remedies the EEOC is<br />
entitled to seek. In Waffle House, an employee signed an<br />
arbitration agreement at the outset o€ employment. 122 S.<br />
Ct., at 158. Sixteen days later, the employee suffered a<br />
seizure and was discharged soon thereafter. - Id. The<br />
employee filed a timely handicap discrimination charge with<br />
the EEOC, but did not initiate arbitration. - Id.<br />
The EEOC investigated the complaint and attempted to<br />
conciliate. I Waffle House,<br />
Inc., 122 S. Ct. at 758. Next,<br />
the EEOC filed an en<strong>for</strong>cement action in Federal Court in<br />
its own name in the public interest, as it is authorized to<br />
do by statute. Id., at 758, 759, 761. The complaint<br />
alleged 'chat the employee was terminated because of his<br />
disability, and requested injunctive relief to eradicate<br />
the effects of the discrimination, and to compensate the<br />
employee. -- Id. at 758.<br />
12