for Suffolk County - Mass Cases
for Suffolk County - Mass Cases
for Suffolk County - Mass Cases
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hosp., 446 <strong>Mass</strong>. 645 (2006); 3ash v. Dana-Farber .. Cancer<br />
Inst., 443 <strong>Mass</strong>. 367 (2005); Thomas v. ED1 Specialists,<br />
- Inc., 437 <strong>Mass</strong>. 536 (2002); and Weber v. Cmty. Teamwork,<br />
- Inc., 434 <strong>Mass</strong>. 761 (2001).<br />
The <strong>Mass</strong>achusetts Conmission Against Discrimination<br />
("MCAD") is the front line <strong>for</strong> en<strong>for</strong>cement of the<br />
Commonwealth' s anti-discriminati.on statutes. The MCAD' s<br />
caseload is diverse, and includes many pro se complainants,<br />
and cases brought by employees who simpxy do not have the<br />
financial capac,ity to retain lawyers.<br />
arbitration of these cases, and divesting the MCAD of<br />
jurisdiction, wi.11 result in a substantial reduction in the<br />
en<strong>for</strong>cement of our anti-discrimination laws.<br />
Compelling<br />
The MCAD's prosecutorial presence is crucial to<br />
support the Commonwealth's overriding public policy to<br />
prohibit discrimination.<br />
to take this activist role, as it is necessary to maintain<br />
public safety and welfare. MELA's members, lawyers who<br />
represent employees against more powerful, corporate<br />
entities, understand the pub1i.c policy disaster that will<br />
result if employers are permitted to avoid the scrutiny and<br />
en<strong>for</strong>cement powers of the MCAD through coerced, pre-dispute<br />
side-agreements.<br />
-_<br />
The Legislature designed the MCAD<br />
2