20.07.2013 Views

for Suffolk County - Mass Cases

for Suffolk County - Mass Cases

for Suffolk County - Mass Cases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hosp., 446 <strong>Mass</strong>. 645 (2006); 3ash v. Dana-Farber .. Cancer<br />

Inst., 443 <strong>Mass</strong>. 367 (2005); Thomas v. ED1 Specialists,<br />

- Inc., 437 <strong>Mass</strong>. 536 (2002); and Weber v. Cmty. Teamwork,<br />

- Inc., 434 <strong>Mass</strong>. 761 (2001).<br />

The <strong>Mass</strong>achusetts Conmission Against Discrimination<br />

("MCAD") is the front line <strong>for</strong> en<strong>for</strong>cement of the<br />

Commonwealth' s anti-discriminati.on statutes. The MCAD' s<br />

caseload is diverse, and includes many pro se complainants,<br />

and cases brought by employees who simpxy do not have the<br />

financial capac,ity to retain lawyers.<br />

arbitration of these cases, and divesting the MCAD of<br />

jurisdiction, wi.11 result in a substantial reduction in the<br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement of our anti-discrimination laws.<br />

Compelling<br />

The MCAD's prosecutorial presence is crucial to<br />

support the Commonwealth's overriding public policy to<br />

prohibit discrimination.<br />

to take this activist role, as it is necessary to maintain<br />

public safety and welfare. MELA's members, lawyers who<br />

represent employees against more powerful, corporate<br />

entities, understand the pub1i.c policy disaster that will<br />

result if employers are permitted to avoid the scrutiny and<br />

en<strong>for</strong>cement powers of the MCAD through coerced, pre-dispute<br />

side-agreements.<br />

-_<br />

The Legislature designed the MCAD<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!