Appellant McCowen Brief - Mass Cases
Appellant McCowen Brief - Mass Cases
Appellant McCowen Brief - Mass Cases
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
fX. THESE VERDICTS<br />
c. 278, §33E.<br />
SHOULD BE REVERSED PURSUANT TO G.L.<br />
When reviewing a capital case, this Court must<br />
scrutinize the law and facts to insure a just result.<br />
G.L. c. 278, S33E; Commonwealth v. Tcmey, 385 <strong>Mass</strong>. 575<br />
(1982). The standard of review is broad, Commonwealth v.<br />
Chaisson, 383 <strong>Mass</strong>. 183 (1981), enabling this Court to<br />
decide these verdicts were rendered against the weight<br />
of the evidence, in the non-technical sense, and prevent<br />
a miscarriage of justice. Commonwealth v. Ahon, 387<br />
<strong>Mass</strong>. 599 (1982); Commonwealth v. Cartagena, 386 <strong>Mass</strong>.<br />
285 (1982). <strong>McCowen</strong>'s constitutional right to a fair<br />
trial by an impartial jury was here violated repeatedly.<br />
His convictions are a miscarriage of justice and must be<br />
reversed. Commonwealth vI Wright, 411 <strong>Mass</strong>. 678, 681<br />
(1992); Commonwealth v. Sylvester, 400 <strong>Mass</strong>. 334, 336<br />
(1987). Extraordinary intervention is warranted by the<br />
foregoing and by the following facts.<br />
<strong>McCowen</strong> moved to suppress DNA test results because<br />
his probation officer Joseph Casey called him to his<br />
office about an unrelated matter and basically forced<br />
MCCOWen to submit. <strong>McCowen</strong>'s consent was not consent at<br />
all; results from that swab should have been excluded.<br />
Commonwealth V. Selby, 420 <strong>Mass</strong>. 656, 663 (1995);<br />
Commonwealth v* Williams, 388 <strong>Mass</strong>. 846,856 (1984). App.<br />
-62-