Central Valley Aquifer, Chapters A and B - MAE Class Websites
Central Valley Aquifer, Chapters A and B - MAE Class Websites Central Valley Aquifer, Chapters A and B - MAE Class Websites
68 Groundwater Availability of the Central Valley Aquifer, California A S a c r a m e n t o V a l l e y 0 50 100 Miles 0 50 100 Kilometers Shaded relief derived from U.S. Geological Survey National Elevation Dataset, 2006. Albers Equal Area Conic Projection Delta S a n J o a q u i n V a l l e y EXPLANATION Estimated change in hydraulic head, predevelopment to 1961, in feet— Rise of 0 to 40 Decline from 0 to 40 Decline from 40 to 80 Decline from 80 to 120 Decline from 120 to 200 Decline from 200 to 300 Decline from 300 to 400 Decline of more than 400 Central Valley boundary Water-balance subregion Tulare Basin Figure B4. A, Estimated change in hydraulic head in upper part of the aquifer system from 1860 to 1961 (modified from Williamson and others, 1989; Bertoldi and others, 1991). B, Simulated change in hydraulic head in lower part of the aquifer system from spring 1962 to spring 2003.
B 01_01645 03b06329 02_05172 04_07807 06b12975 06_14809 Delta 07_13870 0 50 100 Miles 0 50 100 Kilometers Shaded relief derived from U.S. Geological Survey National Elevation Dataset, 2006. Albers Equal Area Conic Projection Figure B4. Continued. 05_10854 08_14958 09_19824 11_21412 10_25517 12_22972 14_28350 Development and Changes to the Hydrologic Budget 69 13_25144 14_30806 15_29737 Simulated change in hydraulic head, 1961 to 2003, in feet— 11_21412 16_30057 15_34255 18_33084 19_37289 19_38742 EXPLANATION Tulare Basin Rise of greater than 400 Rise of 300 to 400 Rise of 200 to 300 Rise of 120 to 200 Rise of 80 to 120 Rise of 40 to 80 Rise of 0 to 40 Decline from 0 to 40 Decline from 40 to 80 Decline from 80 to 120 Decline from 120 to 200 Decline from 200 to 300 Decline from 300 to 400 Central Valley boundary Water-balance subregion Hydrograph well and identifier See figure 13 for hydrographs 20_37212
- Page 35 and 36: for about 30 percent of the annual
- Page 37 and 38: 0 50 100 Miles 0 50 100 Kilometers
- Page 39 and 40: A Coast Ranges Clayey lenses Fault
- Page 41 and 42: - the distribution of these pro
- Page 43 and 44: C DEPTH TO MIDPOINT OF INCREMENT, I
- Page 45 and 46: ). The southern part, referred , in
- Page 47 and 48: 3-D Model of Percentage of Coarse-G
- Page 49 and 50: A Layer 1 EXPLANATION Central Valle
- Page 51 and 52: C Layer Corcoran Clay EXPLANATION C
- Page 53 and 54: E Layer 9 EXPLANATION Central Valle
- Page 55 and 56: Geomorphic province— Basin Delta
- Page 57 and 58: San Joaquin Valley ),
- Page 59 and 60: - Water supplied from aquifers
- Page 61 and 62: C Figure A16. Continued. 3.54% 5.45
- Page 63 and 64: CUMULATIVE DEPARTURE OF PRECIPITATI
- Page 65 and 66: CUMULATIVE DEPARTURE OF STREAMFLOW
- Page 67 and 68: 700 500 600 400 200 160 0 50 100 Mi
- Page 69 and 70: B 0 50 100 Miles 0 50 100 Kilometer
- Page 71 and 72: Water Budget per year (
- Page 73 and 74: References Cited 55 -
- Page 75: References Cited 57 - - 2009, at
- Page 78 and 79: 60 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 80 and 81: 62 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 82 and 83: 64 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 84 and 85: 66 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 88 and 89: 70 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 90 and 91: 72 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 92 and 93: 74 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 94 and 95: 76 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 96 and 97: 78 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 98 and 99: 80 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 100 and 101: 82 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 102 and 103: 84 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 104 and 105: 86 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 106 and 107: 88 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 108 and 109: 90 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 110 and 111: 92 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 112 and 113: 94 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 114 and 115: 96 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 116 and 117: 98 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 118 and 119: 100 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 120 and 121: 102 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 122 and 123: 104 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 124 and 125: 106 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 126 and 127: 108 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 128 and 129: 110 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 130 and 131: 112 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 132 and 133: 114 Groundwater Availability of the
- Page 134 and 135: 116 Groundwater Availability of the
B<br />
01_01645<br />
03b06329<br />
02_05172<br />
04_07807<br />
06b12975<br />
06_14809<br />
Delta<br />
07_13870<br />
0 50 100 Miles<br />
0 50 100 Kilometers<br />
Shaded relief derived from U.S. Geological Survey<br />
National Elevation Dataset, 2006. Albers Equal Area Conic Projection<br />
Figure B4. Continued.<br />
05_10854<br />
08_14958<br />
09_19824<br />
11_21412<br />
10_25517<br />
12_22972<br />
14_28350<br />
Development <strong>and</strong> Changes to the Hydrologic Budget 69<br />
13_25144<br />
14_30806<br />
15_29737<br />
Simulated change in hydraulic head,<br />
1961 to 2003, in feet—<br />
11_21412<br />
16_30057<br />
15_34255<br />
18_33084<br />
19_37289<br />
19_38742<br />
EXPLANATION<br />
Tulare<br />
Basin<br />
Rise of greater than 400<br />
Rise of 300 to 400<br />
Rise of 200 to 300<br />
Rise of 120 to 200<br />
Rise of 80 to 120<br />
Rise of 40 to 80<br />
Rise of 0 to 40<br />
Decline from 0 to 40<br />
Decline from 40 to 80<br />
Decline from 80 to 120<br />
Decline from 120 to 200<br />
Decline from 200 to 300<br />
Decline from 300 to 400<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> boundary<br />
Water-balance subregion<br />
Hydrograph well <strong>and</strong> identifier<br />
See figure 13 for hydrographs<br />
20_37212