Central Valley Aquifer, Chapters A and B - MAE Class Websites
Central Valley Aquifer, Chapters A and B - MAE Class Websites Central Valley Aquifer, Chapters A and B - MAE Class Websites
xiv Tables Chapter A Table A1. Water-balance subregions within the Central Valley, California ...................................11 Table A2. Distribution of statistical properties for the percentage of coarse-grained deposits for the Central Valley, Calfornia, by domain, including variogram and variogram models ....................................................................................................................28 Table A3. Central Valley, California, groundwater flow model layer thicknesses and depths ....29 Chapter B Table B1. Summary of the simulated landscape budget for average (water years 1962-2003), typical (1975), dry (1990), and wet (1998) years for the Central Valley, California ..................................................................................................................................66 Table B2. Summary of the simulated groundwater budget for average (water years 1962-2003), typical (1975), dry (1990), and wet (1998) years for the Central Valley, California ..................................................................................................................................66 Table B3. Selected average annual hydrologic budget components for water years 1962–2003 for each of the 21 water balance areas in the Central Valley, California ..................................................................................................................................78 Chapter C Table C1. MODFLOW-2000 packages and processes used with the hydrologic flow model of the Central Valley, California ...............................................................................122 Table C2. Coordinates of the Central Valley Hydrologic Model grid ..............................................126 Table C3. Land-use periods with acreage in square miles and percentage of different virtual crop categories .........................................................................................138 Table C4. Summary of Central Valley, California, virtual crop categories and properties .........146 Table C5. Summary of fractions of transpiration and evaporation by month for Central Valley, California, virtual crops .............................................................................150 Table C6. Average area-weighted composite efficiency for each water-balance subregion of the Central Valley, California, through the simulation period .................151 Table C7. Average reference evapotranspiration (ETo) by month for the Central Valley, California, for 1961–2003 based on temperature data using the Hargreaves– Samani equation ....................................................................................................................153 Table C8. Measured and simulated hydraulic properties ................................................................157 Table C9. Estimated and Central Valley Hydrologic Model-simulated average and unit evapotranspiration of applied water (ETaw) for the Central Valley, California ..........180 Table C10. Parameter values estimated for the Central Valley Hydrologic Model ........................185 Table C11. Simulated farm budget for the Central Valley, California, in acre-feet per year ........199 Table C12. Simulated groundwater budget for the Central Valley, California, in acre-feet per year ............................................................................................................200
Conversion Factors Inch/Pound to SI Multiply By To obtain Length inch (in.) 2.54 centimeter (cm) inch (in.) 25.4 millimeter (mm) foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m) mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) mile, (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km) Area acre 4,047 square meter (m 2 ) acre 0.4047 hectare (ha) acre 0.4047 square hectometer (hm 2 ) acre 0.004047 square kilometer (km 2 ) square foot (ft 2 ) 929.0 square centimeter (cm 2 ) square foot (ft 2 ) 0.09290 square meter (m 2 ) square inch (in 2 ) 6.452 square centimeter (cm 2 ) section (640 acres or 1 square mile) 259.0 square hectometer (hm 2 ) square mile (mi 2 ) 259.0 hectare (ha) square mile (mi 2 ) 2.590 square kilometer (km 2 ) Volume acre-foot (acre-ft) 1,233 cubic meter (m 3 ) acre-foot (acre-ft) 0.001233 cubic hectometer (hm 3 ) Flow rate acre-foot per day (acre-ft/d) 0.01427 cubic meter per second (m 3 /s) acre-foot per year (acre-ft/yr) 1,233 cubic meter per year (m 3 /yr) acre-foot per year (acre-ft/yr) 0.001233 cubic hectometer per year (hm 3 /yr) Hydraulic conductivity foot per day (ft/d) 0.3048 meter per day (m/d) Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) as follows: °F=(1.8×°C)+32 Vertical coordinate information is referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29). Altitude, as used in this report, refers to distance above or below the NGVD 29. NGVD 29 can be converted to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) by using the National Geodetic Survey conversion utility available at URL http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/TOOLS/ xv
- Page 1 and 2: GROUNDWATER RESOURCES PROGRAM Groun
- Page 3 and 4: Groundwater Availability of the Cen
- Page 5 and 6: Foreword An adequate supply of grou
- Page 7 and 8: Contents Chapter A Introduction, Ov
- Page 9 and 10: Chapter C Numerical Model of the Hy
- Page 11 and 12: Figures Chapter A Figure A1. Map of
- Page 13 and 14: Figure B12. Map of altitude of the
- Page 15: Figure C28. Pie chart and histogram
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter A. Introduction, Overview o
- Page 21 and 22: - - precipitation. -
- Page 23 and 24: 40° 39° 38° 37° 36° 35° Klama
- Page 25 and 26: Texture Model DATA Centralized Geos
- Page 27 and 28: Hydrology Water Well Information Aq
- Page 29 and 30: Table A1. Water-balance subregions
- Page 31 and 32: B Red Bluff 0 50 100 Miles 0 50 100
- Page 33 and 34: Delta and Eastside Streams ).
- Page 35 and 36: for about 30 percent of the annual
- Page 37 and 38: 0 50 100 Miles 0 50 100 Kilometers
- Page 39 and 40: A Coast Ranges Clayey lenses Fault
- Page 41 and 42: - the distribution of these pro
- Page 43 and 44: C DEPTH TO MIDPOINT OF INCREMENT, I
- Page 45 and 46: ). The southern part, referred , in
- Page 47 and 48: 3-D Model of Percentage of Coarse-G
- Page 49 and 50: A Layer 1 EXPLANATION Central Valle
- Page 51 and 52: C Layer Corcoran Clay EXPLANATION C
- Page 53 and 54: E Layer 9 EXPLANATION Central Valle
- Page 55 and 56: Geomorphic province— Basin Delta
- Page 57 and 58: San Joaquin Valley ),
- Page 59 and 60: - Water supplied from aquifers
- Page 61 and 62: C Figure A16. Continued. 3.54% 5.45
- Page 63 and 64: CUMULATIVE DEPARTURE OF PRECIPITATI
- Page 65 and 66: CUMULATIVE DEPARTURE OF STREAMFLOW
xiv<br />
Tables<br />
Chapter A<br />
Table A1. Water-balance subregions within the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California ...................................11<br />
Table A2. Distribution of statistical properties for the percentage of coarse-grained<br />
deposits for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, Calfornia, by domain, including variogram <strong>and</strong><br />
variogram models ....................................................................................................................28<br />
Table A3. <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California, groundwater flow model layer thicknesses <strong>and</strong> depths ....29<br />
Chapter B<br />
Table B1. Summary of the simulated l<strong>and</strong>scape budget for average (water years<br />
1962-2003), typical (1975), dry (1990), <strong>and</strong> wet (1998) years for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>,<br />
California ..................................................................................................................................66<br />
Table B2. Summary of the simulated groundwater budget for average (water years<br />
1962-2003), typical (1975), dry (1990), <strong>and</strong> wet (1998) years for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>,<br />
California ..................................................................................................................................66<br />
Table B3. Selected average annual hydrologic budget components for water years<br />
1962–2003 for each of the 21 water balance areas in the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>,<br />
California ..................................................................................................................................78<br />
Chapter C<br />
Table C1. MODFLOW-2000 packages <strong>and</strong> processes used with the hydrologic flow<br />
model of the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California ...............................................................................122<br />
Table C2. Coordinates of the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Hydrologic Model grid ..............................................126<br />
Table C3. L<strong>and</strong>-use periods with acreage in square miles <strong>and</strong> percentage of<br />
different virtual crop categories .........................................................................................138<br />
Table C4. Summary of <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California, virtual crop categories <strong>and</strong> properties .........146<br />
Table C5. Summary of fractions of transpiration <strong>and</strong> evaporation by month for<br />
<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California, virtual crops .............................................................................150<br />
Table C6. Average area-weighted composite efficiency for each water-balance<br />
subregion of the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California, through the simulation period .................151<br />
Table C7. Average reference evapotranspiration (ETo) by month for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>,<br />
California, for 1961–2003 based on temperature data using the Hargreaves–<br />
Samani equation ....................................................................................................................153<br />
Table C8. Measured <strong>and</strong> simulated hydraulic properties ................................................................157<br />
Table C9. Estimated <strong>and</strong> <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Hydrologic Model-simulated average <strong>and</strong> unit<br />
evapotranspiration of applied water (ETaw) for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California ..........180<br />
Table C10. Parameter values estimated for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> Hydrologic Model ........................185<br />
Table C11. Simulated farm budget for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California, in acre-feet per year ........199<br />
Table C12. Simulated groundwater budget for the <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Valley</strong>, California,<br />
in acre-feet per year ............................................................................................................200