3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ... 3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
98 Conformal decomposition 6.5.2 Hamiltonian constraint Substituting Eq. (6.52) for R and Eq. (6.96) into the Hamiltonian constraint equation (4.65) yields ˜Di ˜ D i Ψ − 1 8 ˜ 1 RΨ + 8 Ãij Ãij − 1 12 K2 + 2πE Ψ 5 = 0 . (6.101) Let us consider the alternative scaling α = −10 to re-express the term Ãij Ãij . By combining Eqs. (6.76), (6.72), (6.82) and (6.85), we get the following relations  ij = Ψ 6 à ij Hence Ãij Ãij = Ψ −12 Âij Âij and Eq. (6.101) becomes and Âij = Ψ 6 Ãij . (6.102) ˜Di ˜ D i Ψ − 1 8 ˜ RΨ + 1 8 Âij Âij Ψ −7 + 2πE − 1 12 K2 Ψ 5 = 0 . (6.103) This is the Lichnerowicz equation. It has been obtained by Lichnerowicz in 1944 [177] in the special case K = 0 (maximal hypersurface) (cf. also Eq. (11.7) in Ref. [178]). Remark : If one regards Eqs. (6.101) and (6.103) as non-linear elliptic equations for Ψ, the negative power (−7) of Ψ in the Âij Âij term in Eq. (6.103), as compared to the positive power (+5) in Eq. (6.101), makes a big difference about the mathematical properties of these two equations. This will be discussed in detail in Chap. 8. 6.5.3 Momentum constraint The momentum constraint has been already written in terms of Âij : it is Eq. (6.83). Taking into account relation (6.102), we can easily rewrite it in terms of Ãij : ˜Dj Ãij + 6 Ãij ˜ Dj ln Ψ − 2 3 ˜ D i K = 8πΨ 4 p i . (6.104) 6.5.4 Summary: conformal 3+1 Einstein system Let us gather Eqs. (6.70), (6.73), (6.97), (6.100), (6.101) and (6.104): ∂ − Lβ Ψ = ∂t Ψ ˜Diβ 6 i − NK (6.105) ∂ − Lβ ˜γij = −2N ∂t Ãij − 2 3 ˜ Dkβ k ˜γij (6.106) ∂ − Lβ K = −Ψ ∂t −4 Di ˜ ˜ D i N + 2 ˜ Di ln Ψ ˜ D i N + N 4π(E + S) + Ãij Ãij + K2 3 (6.107)
6.6 Isenberg-Wilson-Mathews approximation to General Relativity 99 ∂ − Lβ Ãij = − ∂t 2 3 ˜ Dkβ k Ãij + N +Ψ −4 KÃij − 2˜γ kl ÃikÃjl − 8π Ψ −4 Sij − 1 3 S˜γij − ˜ Di ˜ DjN + 2 ˜ Di ln Ψ ˜ DjN + 2 ˜ Dj ln Ψ ˜ DiN + 1 ˜Dk 3 ˜ D k N − 4 ˜ Dk ln Ψ ˜ D k N ˜γij +N ˜Rij − 1 3 ˜ R˜γij − 2 ˜ Di ˜ Dj lnΨ + 4 ˜ Di ln Ψ ˜ Dj ln Ψ + 2 ˜Dk 3 ˜ D k ln Ψ − 2 ˜ Dk ln Ψ ˜ D k ln Ψ ˜γij . (6.108) ˜Di ˜ D i Ψ − 1 8 ˜ 1 RΨ + 8 Ãij Ãij − 1 12 K2 + 2πE Ψ 5 = 0 (6.109) ˜Dj Ãij + 6 Ãij ˜ Dj ln Ψ − 2 3 ˜ D i K = 8πΨ 4 p i . (6.110) For the last two equations, which are the constraints, we have the alternative forms (6.103) and (6.101) in terms of Âij (instead of Ãij ): ˜Di ˜ D i Ψ − 1 8 ˜ RΨ + 1 8 Âij Âij Ψ −7 + 2πE − 1 12 K2 Ψ 5 = 0 , (6.111) ˜Dj Âij − 2 3 Ψ6 ˜ D i K = 8πΨ 10 p i . (6.112) Equations (6.105)-(6.110) constitute the conformal 3+1 Einstein system. An alternative form is constituted by Eqs. (6.105)-(6.108) and (6.111)-(6.112). In terms of the original 3+1 Einstein system (4.63)-(4.66), Eq. (6.105) corresponds to the trace of the kinematical equation (4.63) and Eq. (6.106) to its traceless part, Eq. (6.107) corresponds to the trace of the dynamical Einstein equation (4.64) and Eq. (6.108) to its traceless part, Eq. (6.109) or Eq. (6.111) is the Hamiltonian constraint (4.65), whereas Eq. (6.110) or Eq. (6.112) is the momentum constraint. If the system (6.105)-(6.110) is solved in terms of ˜γij, Ãij (or Âij), Ψ and K, then the physical metric γ and the extrinsic curvature K are recovered by γij = Ψ 4 ˜γij Kij = Ψ 4 Ãij + 1 3 K˜γij (6.113) = Ψ −2 Âij + 1 3 KΨ4 ˜γij. (6.114) 6.6 Isenberg-Wilson-Mathews approximation to General Relativity In 1978, J. Isenberg [160] was looking for some approximation to general relativity without any gravitational wave, beyond the Newtonian theory. The simplest of the approximations that he found amounts to impose that the 3-metric γ is conformally flat. In the framework of the
- Page 48 and 49: 48 Geometry of foliations Note that
- Page 50 and 51: 50 Geometry of foliations
- Page 52 and 53: 52 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 54 and 55: 54 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 56 and 57: 56 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 58 and 59: 58 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 60 and 61: 60 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 62 and 63: 62 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 64 and 65: 64 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 66 and 67: 66 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 68 and 69: 68 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 70 and 71: 70 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 72 and 73: 72 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 74 and 75: 74 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 76 and 77: 76 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 78 and 79: 78 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 80 and 81: 80 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 82 and 83: 82 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 84 and 85: 84 Conformal decomposition equivale
- Page 86 and 87: 86 Conformal decomposition As an ex
- Page 88 and 89: 88 Conformal decomposition 6.2.4 Co
- Page 90 and 91: 90 Conformal decomposition 6.3.1 Ge
- Page 92 and 93: 92 Conformal decomposition where K
- Page 94 and 95: 94 Conformal decomposition to write
- Page 96 and 97: 96 Conformal decomposition hence Lm
- Page 100 and 101: 100 Conformal decomposition discuss
- Page 102 and 103: 102 Conformal decomposition Remark
- Page 104 and 105: 104 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 106 and 107: 106 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 108 and 109: 108 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 110 and 111: 110 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 112 and 113: 112 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 114 and 115: 114 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 116 and 117: 116 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 118 and 119: 118 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 120 and 121: 120 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 122 and 123: 122 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 124 and 125: 124 Asymptotic flatness and global
- Page 126 and 127: 126 The initial data problem Notice
- Page 128 and 129: 128 The initial data problem where
- Page 130 and 131: 130 The initial data problem 8.2.3
- Page 132 and 133: 132 The initial data problem where
- Page 134 and 135: 134 The initial data problem Figure
- Page 136 and 137: 136 The initial data problem Figure
- Page 138 and 139: 138 The initial data problem In par
- Page 140 and 141: 140 The initial data problem Accord
- Page 142 and 143: 142 The initial data problem Remark
- Page 144 and 145: 144 The initial data problem Remark
- Page 146 and 147: 146 The initial data problem 8.4.1
6.6 Isenberg-Wilson-Mathews approximation to General Relativity 99<br />
<br />
∂<br />
− Lβ Ãij = −<br />
∂t 2<br />
3 ˜ Dkβ k Ãij + N<br />
+Ψ −4<br />
<br />
<br />
KÃij − 2˜γ kl ÃikÃjl <br />
− 8π Ψ −4 Sij − 1<br />
3 S˜γij<br />
<br />
− ˜ Di ˜ DjN + 2 ˜ Di ln Ψ ˜ DjN + 2 ˜ Dj ln Ψ ˜ DiN<br />
+ 1<br />
<br />
˜Dk<br />
3<br />
˜ D k N − 4 ˜ Dk ln Ψ ˜ D k <br />
N ˜γij<br />
<br />
+N ˜Rij − 1<br />
3 ˜ R˜γij − 2 ˜ Di ˜ Dj lnΨ + 4 ˜ Di ln Ψ ˜ Dj ln Ψ<br />
+ 2<br />
<br />
˜Dk<br />
3<br />
˜ D k ln Ψ − 2 ˜ Dk ln Ψ ˜ D k <br />
ln Ψ ˜γij .<br />
(6.108)<br />
˜Di ˜ D i Ψ − 1<br />
8 ˜ <br />
1<br />
RΨ +<br />
8 Ãij Ãij − 1<br />
12 K2 <br />
+ 2πE Ψ 5 = 0 (6.109)<br />
˜Dj Ãij + 6 Ãij ˜ Dj ln Ψ − 2<br />
3 ˜ D i K = 8πΨ 4 p i . (6.110)<br />
For the last two equations, which are the constraints, we have the alternative forms (6.103) <strong>and</strong><br />
(6.101) in terms <strong>of</strong> Âij (instead <strong>of</strong> Ãij ):<br />
˜Di ˜ D i Ψ − 1<br />
8 ˜ RΨ + 1<br />
8 Âij Âij Ψ −7 <br />
+ 2πE − 1<br />
12 K2<br />
<br />
Ψ 5 = 0 , (6.111)<br />
˜Dj Âij − 2<br />
3 Ψ6 ˜ D i K = 8πΨ 10 p i . (6.112)<br />
Equations (6.105)-(6.110) constitute the conformal <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system. An alternative<br />
form is constituted by Eqs. (6.105)-(6.108) <strong>and</strong> (6.111)-(6.112). In terms <strong>of</strong> the original <strong>3+1</strong><br />
Einstein system (4.63)-(4.66), Eq. (6.105) corresponds to the trace <strong>of</strong> the kinematical equation<br />
(4.63) <strong>and</strong> Eq. (6.106) to its traceless part, Eq. (6.107) corresponds to the trace <strong>of</strong> the dynamical<br />
Einstein equation (4.64) <strong>and</strong> Eq. (6.108) to its traceless part, Eq. (6.109) or Eq. (6.111) is the<br />
Hamiltonian constraint (4.65), whereas Eq. (6.110) or Eq. (6.112) is the momentum constraint.<br />
If the system (6.105)-(6.110) is solved in terms <strong>of</strong> ˜γij, Ãij (or Âij), Ψ <strong>and</strong> K, then the<br />
physical metric γ <strong>and</strong> the extrinsic curvature K are recovered by<br />
γij = Ψ 4 ˜γij<br />
Kij = Ψ 4<br />
<br />
Ãij + 1<br />
3 K˜γij<br />
<br />
(6.113)<br />
= Ψ −2 Âij + 1<br />
3 KΨ4 ˜γij. (6.114)<br />
6.6 Isenberg-Wilson-Mathews approximation to General Relativity<br />
In 1978, J. Isenberg [160] was looking for some approximation to general <strong>relativity</strong> without any<br />
gravitational wave, beyond the Newtonian theory. The simplest <strong>of</strong> the approximations that<br />
he found amounts to impose that the 3-metric γ is conformally flat. In the framework <strong>of</strong> the