3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.3 Foliation kinematics 43<br />
Figure 3.3: Geometrical construction showing that Lm v ∈ T (Σt) for any vector v tangent to the hypersurface<br />
Σt: on Σt, a vector can be identified to a infinitesimal displacement between two points, p <strong>and</strong> q say. These points<br />
are transported onto the neighbouring hypersurface Σt+δt along the field lines <strong>of</strong> the vector field m (thin lines on<br />
the figure) by the diffeomorphism Φδt associated with m: the displacement between p <strong>and</strong> Φδt(p) is the vector<br />
δtm. The couple <strong>of</strong> points (Φδt(p),Φδt(q)) defines the vector Φδtv(t), which is tangent to Σt+δt since both points<br />
Φδt(p) <strong>and</strong> Φδt(q) belong to Σt+δt. The Lie derivative <strong>of</strong> v along m is then defined by the difference between the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the vector field v at the point Φδt(p), i.e. v(t + δt), <strong>and</strong> the vector transported from Σt along m’s field<br />
lines, i.e. Φδtv(t) : Lm v(t + δt) = limδt→0[v(t + δt) − Φδtv(t)]/δt. Since both vectors v(t + δt) <strong>and</strong> Φδtv(t) are<br />
in T (Σt+δt), it follows then that Lm v(t + δt) ∈ T (Σt+δt).<br />
Remark : The Eulerian observers are sometimes called fiducial observers (e.g. [258]). In<br />
the special case <strong>of</strong> axisymmetric <strong>and</strong> stationary spacetimes, they are called locally nonrotating<br />
observers [34] or zero-angular-momentum observers (ZAMO) [258].<br />
Let us consider two close events p <strong>and</strong> p ′ on the worldline <strong>of</strong> some Eulerian observer. Let t be<br />
the “coordinate time” <strong>of</strong> the event p <strong>and</strong> t + δt (δt > 0) that <strong>of</strong> p ′ , in the sense that p ∈ Σt <strong>and</strong><br />
p ′ ∈ Σt+δt. Then p ′ = p + δt m, as above. The proper time δτ between the events p <strong>and</strong> p ′ , as<br />
measured the Eulerian observer, is given by the metric length <strong>of</strong> the vector linking p <strong>and</strong> p ′ :<br />
δτ = −g(δt m,δt m) = −g(m,m) δt. (3.14)<br />
Since g(m,m) = −N 2 [Eq. (3.9)], we get (assuming N > 0)<br />
δτ = N δt . (3.15)<br />
This equality justifies the name lapse function given to N: N relates the “coordinate time” t<br />
labelling the leaves <strong>of</strong> the foliation to the physical time τ measured by the Eulerian observer.<br />
The 4-acceleration <strong>of</strong> the Eulerian observer is<br />
a = ∇nn. (3.16)<br />
As already noticed in Sec. 2.4.2, the vector a is orthogonal to n <strong>and</strong> hence tangent to Σt.<br />
Moreover, it can be expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the spatial gradient <strong>of</strong> the lapse function. Indeed, by