20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3 Foliation kinematics 43<br />

Figure 3.3: Geometrical construction showing that Lm v ∈ T (Σt) for any vector v tangent to the hypersurface<br />

Σt: on Σt, a vector can be identified to a infinitesimal displacement between two points, p <strong>and</strong> q say. These points<br />

are transported onto the neighbouring hypersurface Σt+δt along the field lines <strong>of</strong> the vector field m (thin lines on<br />

the figure) by the diffeomorphism Φδt associated with m: the displacement between p <strong>and</strong> Φδt(p) is the vector<br />

δtm. The couple <strong>of</strong> points (Φδt(p),Φδt(q)) defines the vector Φδtv(t), which is tangent to Σt+δt since both points<br />

Φδt(p) <strong>and</strong> Φδt(q) belong to Σt+δt. The Lie derivative <strong>of</strong> v along m is then defined by the difference between the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the vector field v at the point Φδt(p), i.e. v(t + δt), <strong>and</strong> the vector transported from Σt along m’s field<br />

lines, i.e. Φδtv(t) : Lm v(t + δt) = limδt→0[v(t + δt) − Φδtv(t)]/δt. Since both vectors v(t + δt) <strong>and</strong> Φδtv(t) are<br />

in T (Σt+δt), it follows then that Lm v(t + δt) ∈ T (Σt+δt).<br />

Remark : The Eulerian observers are sometimes called fiducial observers (e.g. [258]). In<br />

the special case <strong>of</strong> axisymmetric <strong>and</strong> stationary spacetimes, they are called locally nonrotating<br />

observers [34] or zero-angular-momentum observers (ZAMO) [258].<br />

Let us consider two close events p <strong>and</strong> p ′ on the worldline <strong>of</strong> some Eulerian observer. Let t be<br />

the “coordinate time” <strong>of</strong> the event p <strong>and</strong> t + δt (δt > 0) that <strong>of</strong> p ′ , in the sense that p ∈ Σt <strong>and</strong><br />

p ′ ∈ Σt+δt. Then p ′ = p + δt m, as above. The proper time δτ between the events p <strong>and</strong> p ′ , as<br />

measured the Eulerian observer, is given by the metric length <strong>of</strong> the vector linking p <strong>and</strong> p ′ :<br />

δτ = −g(δt m,δt m) = −g(m,m) δt. (3.14)<br />

Since g(m,m) = −N 2 [Eq. (3.9)], we get (assuming N > 0)<br />

δτ = N δt . (3.15)<br />

This equality justifies the name lapse function given to N: N relates the “coordinate time” t<br />

labelling the leaves <strong>of</strong> the foliation to the physical time τ measured by the Eulerian observer.<br />

The 4-acceleration <strong>of</strong> the Eulerian observer is<br />

a = ∇nn. (3.16)<br />

As already noticed in Sec. 2.4.2, the vector a is orthogonal to n <strong>and</strong> hence tangent to Σt.<br />

Moreover, it can be expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the spatial gradient <strong>of</strong> the lapse function. Indeed, by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!