3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ... 3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

luth.obspm.fr
from luth.obspm.fr More from this publisher
20.07.2013 Views

36 Geometry of hypersurfaces Example : We may check the Theorema Egregium (2.96) for the examples of Sec. 2.3.5. It is trivial for the plane, since each term vanishes separately. For the cylinder of radius r, R = 0, K = −1/r [Eq. (2.51)], KijK ij = 1/r 2 [Eq. (2.50)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied. For the sphere of radius r, R = 2/r 2 [Eq. (2.53)], K = −2/r [Eq. (2.59)], KijK ij = 2/r 2 [Eq. (2.58)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied as well. 2.5.2 Codazzi relation Let us at present apply the Ricci identity (2.13) to the normal vector n (or more precisely to any extension of n around Σ, cf. Sec. 2.4.2): If we project this relation onto Σ, we get Now, from Eq. (2.75), (∇α∇β − ∇β∇α) n γ = 4 R γ µαβ nµ . (2.98) γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ 4 R ρ σµνn σ = γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ (∇µ∇νn ρ − ∇ν∇µn ρ ) . (2.99) γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ∇νn ρ = γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ (−K ρ ν − aρ nν) = −γ µ α γν β γγ ρ (∇µK ρ ν + ∇µa ρ nν + a ρ ∇µnν) = −DαK γ β + aγ Kαβ, (2.100) where we have used Eq. (2.79), as well as γ ν β nν = 0, γ γ ρa ρ = a γ , and γ µ αγ ν β ∇µnν = −Kαβ to get the last line. After permutation of the indices α and β and substraction from Eq. (2.100), taking into account the symmetry of Kαβ, we see that Eq. (2.99) becomes γ γ ρ n σ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK γ α − DαK γ β . (2.101) This is the Codazzi relation, also called Codazzi-Mainardi relation in the mathematical litterature [52]. Remark : Thanks to the symmetries of the Riemann tensor (cf. Sec. 2.2.3), changing the index contracted with n in Eq. (2.101) (for instance considering nργ γσ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν or γ γ ρ γ σ α n µ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν ) would not give an independent relation: at most it would result in a change of sign of the right-hand side. Contracting the Codazzi relation on the indices α and γ yields to γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK − DµK µ β , (2.102) with γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = (δ µ ρ + n µ nρ)n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = n σ γ ν β 4 Rσν + γ ν β 4 R ρ σµνnρn σ n µ . Now, from the antisymmetry of the Riemann tensor with respect to its first two indices [Eq. (2.14), the last term vanishes, so that one is left with γ µ α nν 4 Rµν = DαK − DµK µ α We shall call this equation the contracted Codazzi relation. . (2.103)

2.5 Gauss-Codazzi relations 37 Example : The Codazzi relation is trivially satisfied by the three examples of Sec. 2.3.5 because the Riemann tensor vanishes for the Euclidean space R 3 and for each of the considered surfaces, either K = 0 (plane) or K is constant on Σ, in the sense that DK = 0.

36 Geometry <strong>of</strong> hypersurfaces<br />

Example : We may check the Theorema Egregium (2.96) for the examples <strong>of</strong> Sec. 2.3.5. It<br />

is trivial for the plane, since each term vanishes separately. For the cylinder <strong>of</strong> radius r,<br />

R = 0, K = −1/r [Eq. (2.51)], KijK ij = 1/r 2 [Eq. (2.50)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied.<br />

For the sphere <strong>of</strong> radius r, R = 2/r 2 [Eq. (2.53)], K = −2/r [Eq. (2.59)], KijK ij = 2/r 2<br />

[Eq. (2.58)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied as well.<br />

2.5.2 Codazzi relation<br />

Let us at present apply the Ricci identity (2.13) to the normal vector n (or more precisely to<br />

any extension <strong>of</strong> n around Σ, cf. Sec. 2.4.2):<br />

If we project this relation onto Σ, we get<br />

Now, from Eq. (2.75),<br />

(∇α∇β − ∇β∇α) n γ = 4 R γ<br />

µαβ nµ . (2.98)<br />

γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ 4 R ρ σµνn σ = γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ (∇µ∇νn ρ − ∇ν∇µn ρ ) . (2.99)<br />

γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ∇νn ρ = γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ (−K ρ ν − aρ nν)<br />

= −γ µ α γν β γγ ρ (∇µK ρ ν + ∇µa ρ nν + a ρ ∇µnν)<br />

= −DαK γ<br />

β + aγ Kαβ, (2.100)<br />

where we have used Eq. (2.79), as well as γ ν β nν = 0, γ γ ρa ρ = a γ , <strong>and</strong> γ µ αγ ν β ∇µnν = −Kαβ to<br />

get the last line. After permutation <strong>of</strong> the indices α <strong>and</strong> β <strong>and</strong> substraction from Eq. (2.100),<br />

taking into account the symmetry <strong>of</strong> Kαβ, we see that Eq. (2.99) becomes<br />

γ γ ρ n σ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK γ α − DαK γ<br />

β . (2.101)<br />

This is the Codazzi relation, also called Codazzi-Mainardi relation in the mathematical<br />

litterature [52].<br />

Remark : Thanks to the symmetries <strong>of</strong> the Riemann tensor (cf. Sec. 2.2.3), changing the<br />

index contracted with n in Eq. (2.101) (for instance considering nργ γσ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν or<br />

γ γ ρ γ σ α n µ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν ) would not give an independent relation: at most it would result in<br />

a change <strong>of</strong> sign <strong>of</strong> the right-h<strong>and</strong> side.<br />

Contracting the Codazzi relation on the indices α <strong>and</strong> γ yields to<br />

γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK − DµK µ<br />

β , (2.102)<br />

with γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = (δ µ ρ + n µ nρ)n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = n σ γ ν β 4 Rσν + γ ν β 4 R ρ σµνnρn σ n µ . Now,<br />

from the antisymmetry <strong>of</strong> the Riemann tensor with respect to its first two indices [Eq. (2.14),<br />

the last term vanishes, so that one is left with<br />

γ µ α nν 4 Rµν = DαK − DµK µ α<br />

We shall call this equation the contracted Codazzi relation.<br />

. (2.103)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!