3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ... 3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
36 Geometry of hypersurfaces Example : We may check the Theorema Egregium (2.96) for the examples of Sec. 2.3.5. It is trivial for the plane, since each term vanishes separately. For the cylinder of radius r, R = 0, K = −1/r [Eq. (2.51)], KijK ij = 1/r 2 [Eq. (2.50)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied. For the sphere of radius r, R = 2/r 2 [Eq. (2.53)], K = −2/r [Eq. (2.59)], KijK ij = 2/r 2 [Eq. (2.58)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied as well. 2.5.2 Codazzi relation Let us at present apply the Ricci identity (2.13) to the normal vector n (or more precisely to any extension of n around Σ, cf. Sec. 2.4.2): If we project this relation onto Σ, we get Now, from Eq. (2.75), (∇α∇β − ∇β∇α) n γ = 4 R γ µαβ nµ . (2.98) γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ 4 R ρ σµνn σ = γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ (∇µ∇νn ρ − ∇ν∇µn ρ ) . (2.99) γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ∇νn ρ = γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ (−K ρ ν − aρ nν) = −γ µ α γν β γγ ρ (∇µK ρ ν + ∇µa ρ nν + a ρ ∇µnν) = −DαK γ β + aγ Kαβ, (2.100) where we have used Eq. (2.79), as well as γ ν β nν = 0, γ γ ρa ρ = a γ , and γ µ αγ ν β ∇µnν = −Kαβ to get the last line. After permutation of the indices α and β and substraction from Eq. (2.100), taking into account the symmetry of Kαβ, we see that Eq. (2.99) becomes γ γ ρ n σ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK γ α − DαK γ β . (2.101) This is the Codazzi relation, also called Codazzi-Mainardi relation in the mathematical litterature [52]. Remark : Thanks to the symmetries of the Riemann tensor (cf. Sec. 2.2.3), changing the index contracted with n in Eq. (2.101) (for instance considering nργ γσ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν or γ γ ρ γ σ α n µ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν ) would not give an independent relation: at most it would result in a change of sign of the right-hand side. Contracting the Codazzi relation on the indices α and γ yields to γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK − DµK µ β , (2.102) with γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = (δ µ ρ + n µ nρ)n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = n σ γ ν β 4 Rσν + γ ν β 4 R ρ σµνnρn σ n µ . Now, from the antisymmetry of the Riemann tensor with respect to its first two indices [Eq. (2.14), the last term vanishes, so that one is left with γ µ α nν 4 Rµν = DαK − DµK µ α We shall call this equation the contracted Codazzi relation. . (2.103)
2.5 Gauss-Codazzi relations 37 Example : The Codazzi relation is trivially satisfied by the three examples of Sec. 2.3.5 because the Riemann tensor vanishes for the Euclidean space R 3 and for each of the considered surfaces, either K = 0 (plane) or K is constant on Σ, in the sense that DK = 0.
- Page 1: arXiv:gr-qc/0703035v1 6 Mar 2007 3+
- Page 4 and 5: 4 CONTENTS 3.3.6 Evolution of the o
- Page 6 and 7: 6 CONTENTS 8 The initial data probl
- Page 8 and 9: 8 CONTENTS
- Page 10 and 11: 10 CONTENTS
- Page 12 and 13: 12 Introduction 3D (no symmetry at
- Page 14 and 15: 14 Introduction
- Page 16 and 17: 16 Geometry of hypersurfaces in two
- Page 18 and 19: 18 Geometry of hypersurfaces 2.2.3
- Page 20 and 21: 20 Geometry of hypersurfaces Figure
- Page 22 and 23: 22 Geometry of hypersurfaces •
- Page 24 and 25: 24 Geometry of hypersurfaces The ei
- Page 26 and 27: 26 Geometry of hypersurfaces Figure
- Page 28 and 29: 28 Geometry of hypersurfaces The no
- Page 30 and 31: 30 Geometry of hypersurfaces Since
- Page 32 and 33: 32 Geometry of hypersurfaces 2.4.3
- Page 34 and 35: 34 Geometry of hypersurfaces 2.5 Ga
- Page 38 and 39: 38 Geometry of hypersurfaces
- Page 40 and 41: 40 Geometry of foliations Figure 3.
- Page 42 and 43: 42 Geometry of foliations 3.3.2 Nor
- Page 44 and 45: 44 Geometry of foliations means Eq.
- Page 46 and 47: 46 Geometry of foliations Remark :
- Page 48 and 49: 48 Geometry of foliations Note that
- Page 50 and 51: 50 Geometry of foliations
- Page 52 and 53: 52 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 54 and 55: 54 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 56 and 57: 56 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 58 and 59: 58 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 60 and 61: 60 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 62 and 63: 62 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 64 and 65: 64 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 66 and 67: 66 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 68 and 69: 68 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 70 and 71: 70 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 72 and 73: 72 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 74 and 75: 74 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 76 and 77: 76 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 78 and 79: 78 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 80 and 81: 80 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 82 and 83: 82 3+1 equations for matter and ele
- Page 84 and 85: 84 Conformal decomposition equivale
36 Geometry <strong>of</strong> hypersurfaces<br />
Example : We may check the Theorema Egregium (2.96) for the examples <strong>of</strong> Sec. 2.3.5. It<br />
is trivial for the plane, since each term vanishes separately. For the cylinder <strong>of</strong> radius r,<br />
R = 0, K = −1/r [Eq. (2.51)], KijK ij = 1/r 2 [Eq. (2.50)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied.<br />
For the sphere <strong>of</strong> radius r, R = 2/r 2 [Eq. (2.53)], K = −2/r [Eq. (2.59)], KijK ij = 2/r 2<br />
[Eq. (2.58)], so that Eq. (2.96) is satisfied as well.<br />
2.5.2 Codazzi relation<br />
Let us at present apply the Ricci identity (2.13) to the normal vector n (or more precisely to<br />
any extension <strong>of</strong> n around Σ, cf. Sec. 2.4.2):<br />
If we project this relation onto Σ, we get<br />
Now, from Eq. (2.75),<br />
(∇α∇β − ∇β∇α) n γ = 4 R γ<br />
µαβ nµ . (2.98)<br />
γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ 4 R ρ σµνn σ = γ µ αγ ν β γγ ρ (∇µ∇νn ρ − ∇ν∇µn ρ ) . (2.99)<br />
γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ∇νn ρ = γ µ α γν β γγ ρ ∇µ (−K ρ ν − aρ nν)<br />
= −γ µ α γν β γγ ρ (∇µK ρ ν + ∇µa ρ nν + a ρ ∇µnν)<br />
= −DαK γ<br />
β + aγ Kαβ, (2.100)<br />
where we have used Eq. (2.79), as well as γ ν β nν = 0, γ γ ρa ρ = a γ , <strong>and</strong> γ µ αγ ν β ∇µnν = −Kαβ to<br />
get the last line. After permutation <strong>of</strong> the indices α <strong>and</strong> β <strong>and</strong> substraction from Eq. (2.100),<br />
taking into account the symmetry <strong>of</strong> Kαβ, we see that Eq. (2.99) becomes<br />
γ γ ρ n σ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK γ α − DαK γ<br />
β . (2.101)<br />
This is the Codazzi relation, also called Codazzi-Mainardi relation in the mathematical<br />
litterature [52].<br />
Remark : Thanks to the symmetries <strong>of</strong> the Riemann tensor (cf. Sec. 2.2.3), changing the<br />
index contracted with n in Eq. (2.101) (for instance considering nργ γσ γ µ αγ ν β 4 R ρ σµν or<br />
γ γ ρ γ σ α n µ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν ) would not give an independent relation: at most it would result in<br />
a change <strong>of</strong> sign <strong>of</strong> the right-h<strong>and</strong> side.<br />
Contracting the Codazzi relation on the indices α <strong>and</strong> γ yields to<br />
γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = DβK − DµK µ<br />
β , (2.102)<br />
with γ µ ρ n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = (δ µ ρ + n µ nρ)n σ γ ν β 4 R ρ σµν = n σ γ ν β 4 Rσν + γ ν β 4 R ρ σµνnρn σ n µ . Now,<br />
from the antisymmetry <strong>of</strong> the Riemann tensor with respect to its first two indices [Eq. (2.14),<br />
the last term vanishes, so that one is left with<br />
γ µ α nν 4 Rµν = DαK − DµK µ α<br />
We shall call this equation the contracted Codazzi relation.<br />
. (2.103)