20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 Geometry <strong>of</strong> hypersurfaces<br />

2.4.3 Links between the ∇ <strong>and</strong> D connections<br />

Given a tensor field T on Σ, its covariant derivative DT with respect to the Levi-Civita connection<br />

D <strong>of</strong> the metric γ (cf. Sec. 2.3.3) is expressible in terms <strong>of</strong> the covariant derivative ∇T<br />

with respect to the spacetime connection ∇ according to the formula<br />

the component version <strong>of</strong> which is [cf. Eq. (2.71)]:<br />

DρT α1...αp<br />

= γα1<br />

β1...βq µ1<br />

DT = γ ∗ ∇T , (2.78)<br />

· · · γαp<br />

µp γ ν1<br />

β1<br />

· · · γνq<br />

βq γσ µ1...µp<br />

ρ ∇σT ν1...νq . (2.79)<br />

Various comments are appropriate: first <strong>of</strong> all, the T in the right-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> Eq. (2.78) should<br />

be the four-dimensional extension γ ∗ MT provided by Eq. (2.66). Following the remark made<br />

above, we write T instead <strong>of</strong> γ ∗ MT. Similarly the right-h<strong>and</strong> side should write γ∗ MDT, so that<br />

Eq. (2.78) is a equality between tensors on M. Therefore the rigorous version <strong>of</strong> Eq. (2.78) is<br />

γ ∗ MDT = γ∗ [∇(γ ∗ MT)]. (2.80)<br />

Besides, even if T := γ ∗ MT is a four-dimensional tensor, its suppport (domain <strong>of</strong> definition)<br />

remains the hypersurface Σ. In order to define the covariant derivative ∇T, the support must<br />

be an open set <strong>of</strong> M, which Σ is not. Accordingly, one must first construct some extension T ′ <strong>of</strong><br />

T in an open neighbourhood <strong>of</strong> Σ in M <strong>and</strong> then compute ∇T ′ . The key point is that thanks<br />

to the operator γ ∗ acting on ∇T ′ , the result does not depend <strong>of</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> the extension T ′ ,<br />

provided that T ′ = T at every point in Σ.<br />

The demonstration <strong>of</strong> the formula (2.78) takes two steps. First, one can show easily that<br />

γ ∗ ∇ (or more precisely the pull-back <strong>of</strong> γ ∗ ∇γ ∗ M) is a torsion-free connection on Σ, for it satisfies<br />

all the defining properties <strong>of</strong> a connection (linearity, reduction to the gradient for a scalar<br />

field, commutation with contractions <strong>and</strong> Leibniz’ rule) <strong>and</strong> its torsion vanishes. Secondly, this<br />

connection vanishes when applied to the metric tensor γ: indeed, using Eqs. (2.71) <strong>and</strong> (2.69),<br />

(γ ∗ ∇γ) αβγ = γ µ αγ ν βγργ∇ργµν = γ µ αγ ν βγργ(∇ρ gµν +∇ρnµ nν + nµ∇ρnν)<br />

<br />

=0<br />

= γ ρ γ (γµ α γνβnν ∇ρnµ + γ<br />

<br />

=0<br />

µ αnµ ∇ρnν)<br />

<br />

=0<br />

= 0. (2.81)<br />

Invoking the uniqueness <strong>of</strong> the torsion-free connection associated with a given non-degenerate<br />

metric (the Levi-Civita connection, cf. Sec. 2.IV.2 <strong>of</strong> N. Deruelle’s lecture [108]), we conclude<br />

that necessarily γ ∗∇ = D.<br />

One can deduce from Eq. (2.78) an interesting formula about the derivative <strong>of</strong> a vector field<br />

v along another vector field u, when both vectors are tangent to Σ. Indeed, from Eq. (2.78),<br />

(Duv) α = u σ Dσv α = u σ γ ν σ <br />

=uν γ α µ∇νv µ = u ν δ α µ + n α <br />

nµ ∇νv µ<br />

= u ν ∇νv α + n α u ν nµ∇νv µ<br />

<br />

=−v µ = u<br />

∇νnµ<br />

ν ∇νv α − n α u ν v µ ∇µnν, (2.82)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!