20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4.1 The orthogonal projector<br />

2.4 Spacelike hypersurface 29<br />

At each point p ∈ Σ, the space <strong>of</strong> all spacetime vectors can be orthogonally decomposed as<br />

Tp(M) = Tp(Σ) ⊕ Vect(n) , (2.60)<br />

where Vect(n) st<strong>and</strong>s for the 1-dimensional subspace <strong>of</strong> Tp(M) generated by the vector n.<br />

Remark : The orthogonal decomposition (2.60) holds for spacelike <strong>and</strong> timelike hypersurfaces,<br />

but not for the null ones. Indeed for any normal n to a null hypersurface Σ, Vect(n) ⊂<br />

Tp(Σ).<br />

The orthogonal projector onto Σ is the operator γ associated with the decomposition (2.60)<br />

according to<br />

γ : Tp(M) −→ Tp(Σ)<br />

v ↦−→ v + (n · v)n.<br />

In particular, as a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> n · n = −1, γ satisfies<br />

(2.61)<br />

γ(n) = 0. (2.62)<br />

Besides, it reduces to the identity operator for any vector tangent to Σ:<br />

∀v ∈ Tp(Σ), γ(v) = v. (2.63)<br />

According to Eq. (2.61), the components <strong>of</strong> γ with respect to any basis (eα) <strong>of</strong> Tp(M) are<br />

γ α β = δα β + nα nβ . (2.64)<br />

We have noticed in Sec. 2.3.1 that the embedding Φ <strong>of</strong> Σ in M induces a mapping Tp(Σ) →<br />

Tp(M) (push-forward) <strong>and</strong> a mapping T ∗<br />

p (M) → T ∗<br />

p (Σ) (pull-back), but does not provide any<br />

mapping in the reverse ways, i.e. from Tp(M) to Tp(Σ) <strong>and</strong> from T ∗<br />

p (Σ) to T ∗<br />

p (M). The<br />

orthogonal projector naturally provides these reverse mappings: from its very definition, it is a<br />

mapping Tp(M) → Tp(Σ) <strong>and</strong> we can construct from it a mapping γ ∗ M : T ∗<br />

p (Σ) → T ∗<br />

p (M) by<br />

setting, for any linear form ω ∈ T ∗<br />

p (Σ),<br />

γ ∗ Mω : Tp(M) −→ R<br />

v ↦−→ ω(γ(v)).<br />

(2.65)<br />

This clearly defines a linear form belonging to T ∗<br />

p (M). Obviously, we can extend the operation<br />

γ ∗ M to any multilinear form A acting on Tp(Σ), by setting<br />

γ ∗ M A : Tp(M) n −→ R<br />

(v1,... ,vn) ↦−→ A(γ(v1),... ,γ(vn)) .<br />

(2.66)<br />

Let us apply this definition to the bilinear form on Σ constituted by the induced metric γ: γ ∗ M γ<br />

is then a bilinear form on M, which coincides with γ if its two arguments are vectors tangent<br />

to Σ <strong>and</strong> which gives zero if any <strong>of</strong> its argument is a vector orthogonal to Σ, i.e. parallel to n.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!