3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.4.1 The orthogonal projector<br />
2.4 Spacelike hypersurface 29<br />
At each point p ∈ Σ, the space <strong>of</strong> all spacetime vectors can be orthogonally decomposed as<br />
Tp(M) = Tp(Σ) ⊕ Vect(n) , (2.60)<br />
where Vect(n) st<strong>and</strong>s for the 1-dimensional subspace <strong>of</strong> Tp(M) generated by the vector n.<br />
Remark : The orthogonal decomposition (2.60) holds for spacelike <strong>and</strong> timelike hypersurfaces,<br />
but not for the null ones. Indeed for any normal n to a null hypersurface Σ, Vect(n) ⊂<br />
Tp(Σ).<br />
The orthogonal projector onto Σ is the operator γ associated with the decomposition (2.60)<br />
according to<br />
γ : Tp(M) −→ Tp(Σ)<br />
v ↦−→ v + (n · v)n.<br />
In particular, as a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> n · n = −1, γ satisfies<br />
(2.61)<br />
γ(n) = 0. (2.62)<br />
Besides, it reduces to the identity operator for any vector tangent to Σ:<br />
∀v ∈ Tp(Σ), γ(v) = v. (2.63)<br />
According to Eq. (2.61), the components <strong>of</strong> γ with respect to any basis (eα) <strong>of</strong> Tp(M) are<br />
γ α β = δα β + nα nβ . (2.64)<br />
We have noticed in Sec. 2.3.1 that the embedding Φ <strong>of</strong> Σ in M induces a mapping Tp(Σ) →<br />
Tp(M) (push-forward) <strong>and</strong> a mapping T ∗<br />
p (M) → T ∗<br />
p (Σ) (pull-back), but does not provide any<br />
mapping in the reverse ways, i.e. from Tp(M) to Tp(Σ) <strong>and</strong> from T ∗<br />
p (Σ) to T ∗<br />
p (M). The<br />
orthogonal projector naturally provides these reverse mappings: from its very definition, it is a<br />
mapping Tp(M) → Tp(Σ) <strong>and</strong> we can construct from it a mapping γ ∗ M : T ∗<br />
p (Σ) → T ∗<br />
p (M) by<br />
setting, for any linear form ω ∈ T ∗<br />
p (Σ),<br />
γ ∗ Mω : Tp(M) −→ R<br />
v ↦−→ ω(γ(v)).<br />
(2.65)<br />
This clearly defines a linear form belonging to T ∗<br />
p (M). Obviously, we can extend the operation<br />
γ ∗ M to any multilinear form A acting on Tp(Σ), by setting<br />
γ ∗ M A : Tp(M) n −→ R<br />
(v1,... ,vn) ↦−→ A(γ(v1),... ,γ(vn)) .<br />
(2.66)<br />
Let us apply this definition to the bilinear form on Σ constituted by the induced metric γ: γ ∗ M γ<br />
is then a bilinear form on M, which coincides with γ if its two arguments are vectors tangent<br />
to Σ <strong>and</strong> which gives zero if any <strong>of</strong> its argument is a vector orthogonal to Σ, i.e. parallel to n.