20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 Evolution schemes<br />

= 1<br />

<br />

2<br />

−∆ k il ∆l kj<br />

− Dk˜γlj Di˜γ kl − ˜γljDkDi˜γ kl − Dk˜γil Dj˜γ kl − ˜γilDkDj˜γ kl − Dk˜γ kl Dl˜γij<br />

−˜γ kl DkDl˜γij<br />

<br />

− ∆ k il∆l kj . (10.50)<br />

Hence we can write, using DkDi = DiDk (since f is flat) <strong>and</strong> exchanging some indices k <strong>and</strong> l,<br />

where<br />

˜Rij = − 1<br />

<br />

˜γ<br />

2<br />

kl DkDl˜γij + ˜γikDjDl˜γ kl + ˜γjkDiDl˜γ kl<br />

+ Qij(˜γ,D˜γ) , (10.51)<br />

Qij(˜γ,D˜γ) := − 1<br />

<br />

Dk˜γlj Di˜γ<br />

2<br />

kl + Dk˜γil Dj˜γ kl + Dk˜γ kl <br />

Dl˜γij − ∆ k il∆l kj<br />

(10.52)<br />

is a term which does not contain any second derivative <strong>of</strong> ˜γ <strong>and</strong> which is quadratic in the first<br />

derivatives.<br />

10.4.3 Reducing the Ricci tensor to a Laplace operator<br />

If we consider the Ricci tensor as a differential operator acting on the conformal metric ˜γ, its<br />

principal part (or principal symbol, cf. Sec. B.2.2) is given by the three terms involving second<br />

derivatives in the right-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> Eq. (10.51). We recognize in the first term, ˜γ klDkDl˜γij, a kind <strong>of</strong> Laplace operator acting on ˜γij. Actually, for a weak gravitational field, i.e. for<br />

˜γ ij = fij + hij with fikfjlhklh ij ≪ 1, we have, at the linear order in h, ˜γ klDkDl˜γij ≃ ∆f˜γij,<br />

where ∆f = fklDkDl is the Laplace operator associated with the metric f. If we combine<br />

Eqs. (6.106) <strong>and</strong> (6.108), the Laplace operator in ˜ Rij gives rise to a wave operator for ˜γij,<br />

namely 2 ∂<br />

− Lβ −<br />

∂t N2<br />

Ψ4 ˜γkl <br />

DkDl ˜γij = · · · (10.53)<br />

Unfortunately the other two terms that involve second derivatives in Eq. (10.51), namely<br />

˜γikDjDl˜γ kl <strong>and</strong> ˜γjkDiDl˜γ kl , spoil the elliptic character <strong>of</strong> the operator acting on ˜γij in ˜ Rij,<br />

so that the combination <strong>of</strong> Eqs. (6.106) <strong>and</strong> (6.108) does no longer lead to a wave operator.<br />

To restore the Laplace operator, Shibata <strong>and</strong> Nakamura [233] have considered the term Dl˜γ kl<br />

which appears in the second <strong>and</strong> third terms <strong>of</strong> Eq. (10.51) as a variable independent from ˜γij.<br />

We recognize in this term the opposite <strong>of</strong> the vector ˜Γ that has been introduced in Sec. 9.3.4<br />

[cf. Eq. (9.80)]:<br />

˜Γ i = −Dj˜γ ij . (10.54)<br />

Equation (10.51) then becomes<br />

˜Rij = 1<br />

<br />

−˜γ<br />

2<br />

kl DkDl˜γij + ˜γikDj ˜ Γ k + ˜γjkDi ˜ Γ k<br />

+ Qij(˜γ,D˜γ) . (10.55)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!