3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
184 Evolution schemes<br />
= 1<br />
<br />
2<br />
−∆ k il ∆l kj<br />
− Dk˜γlj Di˜γ kl − ˜γljDkDi˜γ kl − Dk˜γil Dj˜γ kl − ˜γilDkDj˜γ kl − Dk˜γ kl Dl˜γij<br />
−˜γ kl DkDl˜γij<br />
<br />
− ∆ k il∆l kj . (10.50)<br />
Hence we can write, using DkDi = DiDk (since f is flat) <strong>and</strong> exchanging some indices k <strong>and</strong> l,<br />
where<br />
˜Rij = − 1<br />
<br />
˜γ<br />
2<br />
kl DkDl˜γij + ˜γikDjDl˜γ kl + ˜γjkDiDl˜γ kl<br />
+ Qij(˜γ,D˜γ) , (10.51)<br />
Qij(˜γ,D˜γ) := − 1<br />
<br />
Dk˜γlj Di˜γ<br />
2<br />
kl + Dk˜γil Dj˜γ kl + Dk˜γ kl <br />
Dl˜γij − ∆ k il∆l kj<br />
(10.52)<br />
is a term which does not contain any second derivative <strong>of</strong> ˜γ <strong>and</strong> which is quadratic in the first<br />
derivatives.<br />
10.4.3 Reducing the Ricci tensor to a Laplace operator<br />
If we consider the Ricci tensor as a differential operator acting on the conformal metric ˜γ, its<br />
principal part (or principal symbol, cf. Sec. B.2.2) is given by the three terms involving second<br />
derivatives in the right-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>of</strong> Eq. (10.51). We recognize in the first term, ˜γ klDkDl˜γij, a kind <strong>of</strong> Laplace operator acting on ˜γij. Actually, for a weak gravitational field, i.e. for<br />
˜γ ij = fij + hij with fikfjlhklh ij ≪ 1, we have, at the linear order in h, ˜γ klDkDl˜γij ≃ ∆f˜γij,<br />
where ∆f = fklDkDl is the Laplace operator associated with the metric f. If we combine<br />
Eqs. (6.106) <strong>and</strong> (6.108), the Laplace operator in ˜ Rij gives rise to a wave operator for ˜γij,<br />
namely 2 ∂<br />
− Lβ −<br />
∂t N2<br />
Ψ4 ˜γkl <br />
DkDl ˜γij = · · · (10.53)<br />
Unfortunately the other two terms that involve second derivatives in Eq. (10.51), namely<br />
˜γikDjDl˜γ kl <strong>and</strong> ˜γjkDiDl˜γ kl , spoil the elliptic character <strong>of</strong> the operator acting on ˜γij in ˜ Rij,<br />
so that the combination <strong>of</strong> Eqs. (6.106) <strong>and</strong> (6.108) does no longer lead to a wave operator.<br />
To restore the Laplace operator, Shibata <strong>and</strong> Nakamura [233] have considered the term Dl˜γ kl<br />
which appears in the second <strong>and</strong> third terms <strong>of</strong> Eq. (10.51) as a variable independent from ˜γij.<br />
We recognize in this term the opposite <strong>of</strong> the vector ˜Γ that has been introduced in Sec. 9.3.4<br />
[cf. Eq. (9.80)]:<br />
˜Γ i = −Dj˜γ ij . (10.54)<br />
Equation (10.51) then becomes<br />
˜Rij = 1<br />
<br />
−˜γ<br />
2<br />
kl DkDl˜γij + ˜γikDj ˜ Γ k + ˜γjkDi ˜ Γ k<br />
+ Qij(˜γ,D˜γ) . (10.55)