3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ... 3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

luth.obspm.fr
from luth.obspm.fr More from this publisher
20.07.2013 Views

180 Evolution schemes Now the ∇-divergence of F is related to the D-one by Besides, we have DµF µα = γ ρ µ γµ σ γνα ∇ρF σ ν = γρ σ γνα ∇ρF σ ν = γνα (∇ρF ρ ν + nρ nσ∇ρF σ ν ) = γ να (∇ρF ρ ν − F σ νn ρ ∇ρnσ) = γ να ∇µF µ ν − F αµ Dµ ln N. (10.31) γ α νn µ ∇µM ν = 1 N γα νm µ ∇µM ν = 1 N γα ν (LmM ν + M µ ∇µm ν ) = 1 N [LmM α + γ α νM µ (∇µN n ν + N∇µn ν )] = 1 N LmM α − K α µ Mµ , (10.32) where property (3.32) has been used to write γ α νLmM ν = LmM α . Thanks to Eqs. (10.31) and (10.32), and to the relation Lm = ∂/∂t −Lβ , Eq. (10.30) yields an evolution equation for the momentum constraint violation: ∂ − Lβ ∂t M i = −Dj(NF ij ) + 2NK i j Mj + NKM i + ND i (F − H) + (F − 2H)D i N . (10.33) Let us now assume that the dynamical Einstein equation is satisfied, then F = 0 [Eq. (10.12)] and Eqs. (10.29) and (10.33) reduce to ∂ ∂t − Lβ ∂ − Lβ ∂t H = −Di(NM i ) + 2NKH − M i DiN (10.34) M i = −D i (NH) + 2NK i jM j + NKM i + HD i N. (10.35) If the constraints are satisfied at t = 0, then H|t=0 = 0 and M i |t=0 = 0. The above system gives then ∂H ∂t ∂M i ∂t t=0 t=0 = 0 (10.36) = 0. (10.37) We conclude that, at least in the case where all the fields are analytical (in order to invoke the Cauchy-Kovalevskaya theorem), ∀t ≥ 0, H = 0 and M i = 0, (10.38) i.e. the constraints are preserved by the dynamical evolution equation (4.64). Even if the hypothesis of analyticity is relaxed, the result still holds because the system (10.34)-(10.35) is symmetric hyperbolic [136]. Remark : The above result on the preservation of the constraints in a free evolution scheme holds only if the matter source obeys the energy-momentum conservation law (10.23).

10.3.3 Constraint-violating modes 10.4 BSSN scheme 181 The constraint preservation property established in the preceding section adds some substantial support to the concept of free evolution scheme. However this is a mathematical result and it does not guarantee that numerical solutions will not violate the constraints. Indeed numerical codes based on free evolution schemes have been plagued for a long time by the so-called constraintviolating modes. The latter are solutions (γ,K,N,β) which satisfy F = 0 up to numerical accuracy but with H = 0 and M = 0, although if initially H = 0 and M = 0 (up to numerical accuracy). The reasons for the appearance of these constraint-violating modes are twofold: (i) due to numerical errors, the conditions H = 0 and M = 0 are slightly violated in the initial data, and the evolution equations amplify (in most cases exponentially !) this violation and (ii) constraint violations may flow into the computational domain from boundary conditions imposed at timelike boundaries. Notice that the demonstration in Sec. 10.3.2 did not take into account any boundary and could not rule out (ii). An impressive amount of works have then been devoted to this issue (see [243] for a review and Ref. [167, 217] for recent solutions to problem (ii)). We mention hereafter shortly the symmetric hyperbolic formulations, before discussing the most successful approach to date: the BSSN scheme. 10.3.4 Symmetric hyperbolic formulations The idea is to introduce auxiliary variables so that the dynamical equations become a first-order symmetric hyperbolic system, because these systems are known to be well posed (see e.g. [250, 214]). This comprises the formulation developed in 2001 by Kidder, Scheel and Teukolsky [168] (KST formulation), which constitutes some generalization of previous formulations developed by Frittelli and Reula (1996) [137] and by Andersson and York (1999) [13], the latter being known as the Einstein-Christoffel system. 10.4 BSSN scheme 10.4.1 Introduction The BSSN scheme is a free evolution scheme for the conformal 3+1 Einstein system (6.105)- (6.110) which has been devised by Shibata and Nakamura in 1995 [233]. It has been re-analyzed by Baumgarte and Shapiro in 1999 [43], with a slight modification, and bears since then the name BSSN for Baumgarte-Shapiro-Shibata-Nakamura. 10.4.2 Expression of the Ricci tensor of the conformal metric The starting point of the BSSN formulation is the conformal 3+1 Einstein system (6.105)-(6.110). One then proceeds by expressing the Ricci tensor ˜R of the conformal metric ˜γ, which appears in Eq. (6.108), in terms of the derivatives of ˜γ. To this aim, we consider the standard expression of the Ricci tensor in terms of the Christoffel symbols ˜ Γk ij of the metric ˜γ with respect to the

10.3.3 Constraint-violating modes<br />

10.4 BSSN scheme 181<br />

The constraint preservation property established in the preceding section adds some substantial<br />

support to the concept <strong>of</strong> free evolution scheme. However this is a mathematical result <strong>and</strong> it does<br />

not guarantee that <strong>numerical</strong> solutions will not violate the constraints. Indeed <strong>numerical</strong> codes<br />

based on free evolution schemes have been plagued for a long time by the so-called constraintviolating<br />

modes. The latter are solutions (γ,K,N,β) which satisfy F = 0 up to <strong>numerical</strong><br />

accuracy but with H = 0 <strong>and</strong> M = 0, although if initially H = 0 <strong>and</strong> M = 0 (up to <strong>numerical</strong><br />

accuracy). The reasons for the appearance <strong>of</strong> these constraint-violating modes are tw<strong>of</strong>old: (i)<br />

due to <strong>numerical</strong> errors, the conditions H = 0 <strong>and</strong> M = 0 are slightly violated in the initial<br />

data, <strong>and</strong> the evolution equations amplify (in most cases exponentially !) this violation <strong>and</strong><br />

(ii) constraint violations may flow into the computational domain from boundary conditions<br />

imposed at timelike boundaries. Notice that the demonstration in Sec. 10.3.2 did not take into<br />

account any boundary <strong>and</strong> could not rule out (ii).<br />

An impressive amount <strong>of</strong> works have then been devoted to this issue (see [243] for a review<br />

<strong>and</strong> Ref. [167, 217] for recent solutions to problem (ii)). We mention hereafter shortly the<br />

symmetric hyperbolic formulations, before discussing the most successful approach to date: the<br />

BSSN scheme.<br />

10.3.4 Symmetric hyperbolic formulations<br />

The idea is to introduce auxiliary variables so that the dynamical equations become a first-order<br />

symmetric hyperbolic system, because these systems are known to be well posed (see e.g. [250,<br />

214]). This comprises the formulation developed in 2001 by Kidder, Scheel <strong>and</strong> Teukolsky [168]<br />

(KST formulation), which constitutes some generalization <strong>of</strong> previous formulations developed<br />

by Frittelli <strong>and</strong> Reula (1996) [137] <strong>and</strong> by Andersson <strong>and</strong> York (1999) [13], the latter being<br />

known as the Einstein-Christ<strong>of</strong>fel system.<br />

10.4 BSSN scheme<br />

10.4.1 Introduction<br />

The BSSN scheme is a free evolution scheme for the conformal <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system (6.105)-<br />

(6.110) which has been devised by Shibata <strong>and</strong> Nakamura in 1995 [233]. It has been re-analyzed<br />

by Baumgarte <strong>and</strong> Shapiro in 1999 [43], with a slight modification, <strong>and</strong> bears since then the<br />

name BSSN for Baumgarte-Shapiro-Shibata-Nakamura.<br />

10.4.2 Expression <strong>of</strong> the Ricci tensor <strong>of</strong> the conformal metric<br />

The starting point <strong>of</strong> the BSSN formulation is the conformal <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein system (6.105)-(6.110).<br />

One then proceeds by expressing the Ricci tensor ˜R <strong>of</strong> the conformal metric ˜γ, which appears<br />

in Eq. (6.108), in terms <strong>of</strong> the derivatives <strong>of</strong> ˜γ. To this aim, we consider the st<strong>and</strong>ard expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Ricci tensor in terms <strong>of</strong> the Christ<strong>of</strong>fel symbols ˜ Γk ij <strong>of</strong> the metric ˜γ with respect to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!