3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ... 3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
18 Geometry of hypersurfaces 2.2.3 Curvature tensor We follow the MTW convention [189] and define the Riemann curvature tensor of the spacetime connection ∇ by 2 4 Riem : T ∗ (M) × T (M) 3 −→ C ∞ (M, R) (ω,w,u,v) ↦−→ ω, ∇u∇vw − ∇v∇uw −∇ [u,v]w , (2.12) where C∞ (M, R) denotes the space of smooth scalar fields on M. As it is well known, the above formula does define a tensor field on M, i.e. the value of 4Riem(ω,w,u,v) at a given point p ∈ M depends only upon the values of the fields ω, w, u and v at p and not upon their behaviors away from p, as the gradients in Eq. (2.12) might suggest. We denote the components of this tensor in a given basis (eα), not by 4Riem γ δαβ , but by 4R γ δαβ . The definition (2.12) leads then to the following writing (called Ricci identity): ∀w ∈ T (M), (∇α∇β − ∇β∇α) w γ = 4 R γ µαβ wµ , (2.13) From the definition (2.12), the Riemann tensor is clearly antisymmetric with respect to its last two arguments (u,v). The fact that the connection ∇ is associated with a metric (i.e. g) implies the additional well-known antisymmetry: ∀(ω,w) ∈ T ∗ (M) × T (M), 4 Riem(ω,w, ·, ·) = − 4 Riem(w, ω, ·, ·). (2.14) In addition, the Riemann tensor satisfies the cyclic property ∀(u,v,w) ∈ T (M) 3 , 4 Riem(·,u,v,w) + 4 Riem(·,w,u,v) + 4 Riem(·,v,w,u) = 0 . (2.15) The Ricci tensor of the spacetime connection ∇ is the bilinear form 4 R defined by 4 R : T (M) × T (M) −→ C ∞ (M, R) (u,v) ↦−→ 4 Riem(e µ ,u,eµ,v). (2.16) This definition is independent of the choice of the basis (eα) and its dual counterpart (e α ). Moreover the bilinear form 4 R is symmetric. In terms of components: 4 Rαβ = 4 R µ αµβ . (2.17) Note that, following the standard usage, we are denoting the components of both the Riemann and Ricci tensors by the same letter R, the number of indices allowing to distinguish between the two tensors. On the contrary we are using different symbols, 4 Riem and 4 R, when dealing with the ‘intrinsic’ notation. 2 the superscript ‘4’ stands for the four dimensions of M and is used to distinguish from Riemann tensors that will be defined on submanifolds of M
2.3 Hypersurface embedded in spacetime 19 Finally, the Riemann tensor can be split into (i) a “trace-trace” part, represented by the Ricci scalar 4 R := g µν4 Rµν (also called scalar curvature), (ii) a “trace” part, represented by the Ricci tensor 4 R [cf. Eq. (2.17)], and (iii) a “traceless” part, which is constituted by the Weyl conformal curvature tensor, 4 C: 4 R γ δαβ = 4 C γ δαβ + 14 R 6 1 + 2 4R γ α gδβ − 4 R γ gδα δ γ β − gδβ δ γ α β gδα + 4 Rδβ δ γ α − 4 Rδα δ γ β . (2.18) The above relation can be taken as the definition of 4 C. It implies that 4 C is traceless: 4 µ C αµβ = 0 . (2.19) The other possible traces are zero thanks to the symmetry properties of the Riemann tensor. It is well known that the 20 independent components of the Riemann tensor distribute in the 10 components in the Ricci tensor, which are fixed by Einstein equation, and 10 independent components in the Weyl tensor. 2.3 Hypersurface embedded in spacetime 2.3.1 Definition A hypersurface Σ of M is the image of a 3-dimensional manifold ˆ Σ by an embedding Φ : ˆ Σ → M (Fig. 2.1) : Σ = Φ( ˆ Σ). (2.20) Let us recall that embedding means that Φ : ˆ Σ → Σ is a homeomorphism, i.e. a one-to-one mapping such that both Φ and Φ −1 are continuous. The one-to-one character guarantees that Σ does not “intersect itself”. A hypersurface can be defined locally as the set of points for which a scalar field on M, t let say, is constant: ∀p ∈ M, p ∈ Σ ⇐⇒ t(p) = 0. (2.21) For instance, let us assume that Σ is a connected submanifold of M with topology R 3 . Then we may introduce locally a coordinate system of M, x α = (t,x,y,z), such that t spans R and (x,y,z) are Cartesian coordinates spanning R 3 . Σ is then defined by the coordinate condition t = 0 [Eq. (2.21)] and an explicit form of the mapping Φ can be obtained by considering x i = (x,y,z) as coordinates on the 3-manifold ˆ Σ : Φ : ˆ Σ −→ M (x,y,z) ↦−→ (0,x,y,z). (2.22) The embedding Φ “carries along” curves in ˆ Σ to curves in M. Consequently it also “carries along” vectors on ˆ Σ to vectors on M (cf. Fig. 2.1). In other words, it defines a mapping between
- Page 1: arXiv:gr-qc/0703035v1 6 Mar 2007 3+
- Page 4 and 5: 4 CONTENTS 3.3.6 Evolution of the o
- Page 6 and 7: 6 CONTENTS 8 The initial data probl
- Page 8 and 9: 8 CONTENTS
- Page 10 and 11: 10 CONTENTS
- Page 12 and 13: 12 Introduction 3D (no symmetry at
- Page 14 and 15: 14 Introduction
- Page 16 and 17: 16 Geometry of hypersurfaces in two
- Page 20 and 21: 20 Geometry of hypersurfaces Figure
- Page 22 and 23: 22 Geometry of hypersurfaces •
- Page 24 and 25: 24 Geometry of hypersurfaces The ei
- Page 26 and 27: 26 Geometry of hypersurfaces Figure
- Page 28 and 29: 28 Geometry of hypersurfaces The no
- Page 30 and 31: 30 Geometry of hypersurfaces Since
- Page 32 and 33: 32 Geometry of hypersurfaces 2.4.3
- Page 34 and 35: 34 Geometry of hypersurfaces 2.5 Ga
- Page 36 and 37: 36 Geometry of hypersurfaces Exampl
- Page 38 and 39: 38 Geometry of hypersurfaces
- Page 40 and 41: 40 Geometry of foliations Figure 3.
- Page 42 and 43: 42 Geometry of foliations 3.3.2 Nor
- Page 44 and 45: 44 Geometry of foliations means Eq.
- Page 46 and 47: 46 Geometry of foliations Remark :
- Page 48 and 49: 48 Geometry of foliations Note that
- Page 50 and 51: 50 Geometry of foliations
- Page 52 and 53: 52 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 54 and 55: 54 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 56 and 57: 56 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 58 and 59: 58 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 60 and 61: 60 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 62 and 63: 62 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 64 and 65: 64 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
- Page 66 and 67: 66 3+1 decomposition of Einstein eq
18 Geometry <strong>of</strong> hypersurfaces<br />
2.2.3 Curvature tensor<br />
We follow the MTW convention [189] <strong>and</strong> define the Riemann curvature tensor <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spacetime connection ∇ by 2<br />
4 Riem : T ∗ (M) × T (M) 3 −→ C ∞ (M, R)<br />
(ω,w,u,v) ↦−→<br />
<br />
ω, ∇u∇vw − ∇v∇uw<br />
<br />
−∇ [u,v]w ,<br />
(2.12)<br />
where C∞ (M, R) denotes the space <strong>of</strong> smooth scalar fields on M. As it is well known, the<br />
above formula does define a tensor field on M, i.e. the value <strong>of</strong> 4Riem(ω,w,u,v) at a given<br />
point p ∈ M depends only upon the values <strong>of</strong> the fields ω, w, u <strong>and</strong> v at p <strong>and</strong> not upon their<br />
behaviors away from p, as the gradients in Eq. (2.12) might suggest. We denote the components<br />
<strong>of</strong> this tensor in a given basis (eα), not by 4Riem γ<br />
δαβ , but by 4R γ<br />
δαβ . The definition (2.12) leads<br />
then to the following writing (called Ricci identity):<br />
∀w ∈ T (M), (∇α∇β − ∇β∇α) w γ = 4 R γ<br />
µαβ wµ , (2.13)<br />
From the definition (2.12), the Riemann tensor is clearly antisymmetric with respect to its last<br />
two arguments (u,v). The fact that the connection ∇ is associated with a metric (i.e. g) implies<br />
the additional well-known antisymmetry:<br />
∀(ω,w) ∈ T ∗ (M) × T (M), 4 Riem(ω,w, ·, ·) = − 4 Riem(w, ω, ·, ·). (2.14)<br />
In addition, the Riemann tensor satisfies the cyclic property<br />
∀(u,v,w) ∈ T (M) 3 ,<br />
4 Riem(·,u,v,w) + 4 Riem(·,w,u,v) + 4 Riem(·,v,w,u) = 0 . (2.15)<br />
The Ricci tensor <strong>of</strong> the spacetime connection ∇ is the bilinear form 4 R defined by<br />
4 R : T (M) × T (M) −→ C ∞ (M, R)<br />
(u,v) ↦−→ 4 Riem(e µ ,u,eµ,v).<br />
(2.16)<br />
This definition is independent <strong>of</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> the basis (eα) <strong>and</strong> its dual counterpart (e α ).<br />
Moreover the bilinear form 4 R is symmetric. In terms <strong>of</strong> components:<br />
4<br />
Rαβ = 4 R µ<br />
αµβ . (2.17)<br />
Note that, following the st<strong>and</strong>ard usage, we are denoting the components <strong>of</strong> both the Riemann<br />
<strong>and</strong> Ricci tensors by the same letter R, the number <strong>of</strong> indices allowing to distinguish between<br />
the two tensors. On the contrary we are using different symbols, 4 Riem <strong>and</strong> 4 R, when dealing<br />
with the ‘intrinsic’ notation.<br />
2 the superscript ‘4’ st<strong>and</strong>s for the four dimensions <strong>of</strong> M <strong>and</strong> is used to distinguish from Riemann tensors that<br />
will be defined on submanifolds <strong>of</strong> M