3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
172 Choice <strong>of</strong> foliation <strong>and</strong> spatial coordinates<br />
Recently, van Meter et al. [264] <strong>and</strong> Brügmann et al. [69] have considered a modified version <strong>of</strong><br />
Eq. (9.91), by replacing all the derivatives ∂/∂t by ∂/∂t − β j ∂/∂x j , i.e. writing<br />
⎧<br />
⎪⎨<br />
⎪⎩<br />
∂βi ∂t<br />
∂Bi ∂t<br />
∂βi<br />
− βj = kBi<br />
∂xj − βj ∂Bi<br />
∂x j = ∂˜ Γ i<br />
∂t − βj ∂˜ Γ i<br />
∂x j − ηBi .<br />
(9.93)<br />
In particular, Brügmann et al. [69, 184] have computed binary black hole mergers using (9.93)<br />
with k = 3/4 <strong>and</strong> η ranging from 0 to 3.5/M, whereas Herrmann et al. [158] have used (9.93)<br />
with k = 3/4 <strong>and</strong> η = 2/M.<br />
9.3.6 Other dynamical shift gauges<br />
Shibata (2003) [228] has introduced a spatial gauge that is closely related to the hyperbolic<br />
Gamma driver: it is defined by the requirement<br />
∂βi <br />
= ˜γij Fj + δt<br />
∂t ∂Fj<br />
<br />
, (9.94)<br />
∂t<br />
where δt is the time step used in the <strong>numerical</strong> computation <strong>and</strong> 4<br />
Fi := D j ˜γij. (9.95)<br />
From the definition <strong>of</strong> the inverse metric ˜γ ij , namely the identity ˜γ ik˜γkj = δi j , <strong>and</strong> relation<br />
(9.80), it is easy to show that Fi is related to ˜ Γ i by<br />
Fi = ˜γij ˜ Γ j −<br />
<br />
˜γ jk − f jk<br />
Dk˜γij. (9.96)<br />
Notice that in the weak field region, i.e. where ˜γ ij = f ij + h ij with fikfjlh kl h ij ≪ 1, the second<br />
term in Eq. (9.96) is <strong>of</strong> second order in h, so that at first order in h, Eq. (9.96) reduces to<br />
Fi ≃ ˜γij ˜ Γ j . Accordingly Shibata’s prescription (9.94) becomes<br />
∂β i<br />
∂t ≃ ˜ Γ i + ˜γ ij δt ∂Fj<br />
∂t<br />
. (9.97)<br />
If we disregard the δt term in the right-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>and</strong> take the time derivative <strong>of</strong> this equation,<br />
we obtain the Gamma-driver condition (9.89) with k = 1 <strong>and</strong> η = 0. The term in δt has been<br />
introduced by Shibata [228] in order to stabilize the <strong>numerical</strong> code.<br />
The spatial gauge (9.94) has been used by Shibata (2003) [228] <strong>and</strong> Sekiguchi <strong>and</strong> Shibata<br />
(2005) [221] to compute axisymmetric gravitational collapse <strong>of</strong> rapidly rotating neutron stars<br />
to black holes, as well as by Shibata <strong>and</strong> Sekiguchi (2005) [234] to compute 3D gravitational<br />
collapses, allowing for the development <strong>of</strong> nonaxisymmetric instabilities. It has also been used<br />
by Shibata, Taniguchi <strong>and</strong> Uryu (2003-2006) [237, 238, 236] to compute the merger <strong>of</strong> binary<br />
neutron stars, while their preceding computations [239, 240] rely on the approximate minimal<br />
distortion gauge (Sec. 9.3.3).<br />
4 let us recall that D i := f ij Dj