20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 Choice <strong>of</strong> foliation <strong>and</strong> spatial coordinates<br />

Recently, van Meter et al. [264] <strong>and</strong> Brügmann et al. [69] have considered a modified version <strong>of</strong><br />

Eq. (9.91), by replacing all the derivatives ∂/∂t by ∂/∂t − β j ∂/∂x j , i.e. writing<br />

⎧<br />

⎪⎨<br />

⎪⎩<br />

∂βi ∂t<br />

∂Bi ∂t<br />

∂βi<br />

− βj = kBi<br />

∂xj − βj ∂Bi<br />

∂x j = ∂˜ Γ i<br />

∂t − βj ∂˜ Γ i<br />

∂x j − ηBi .<br />

(9.93)<br />

In particular, Brügmann et al. [69, 184] have computed binary black hole mergers using (9.93)<br />

with k = 3/4 <strong>and</strong> η ranging from 0 to 3.5/M, whereas Herrmann et al. [158] have used (9.93)<br />

with k = 3/4 <strong>and</strong> η = 2/M.<br />

9.3.6 Other dynamical shift gauges<br />

Shibata (2003) [228] has introduced a spatial gauge that is closely related to the hyperbolic<br />

Gamma driver: it is defined by the requirement<br />

∂βi <br />

= ˜γij Fj + δt<br />

∂t ∂Fj<br />

<br />

, (9.94)<br />

∂t<br />

where δt is the time step used in the <strong>numerical</strong> computation <strong>and</strong> 4<br />

Fi := D j ˜γij. (9.95)<br />

From the definition <strong>of</strong> the inverse metric ˜γ ij , namely the identity ˜γ ik˜γkj = δi j , <strong>and</strong> relation<br />

(9.80), it is easy to show that Fi is related to ˜ Γ i by<br />

Fi = ˜γij ˜ Γ j −<br />

<br />

˜γ jk − f jk<br />

Dk˜γij. (9.96)<br />

Notice that in the weak field region, i.e. where ˜γ ij = f ij + h ij with fikfjlh kl h ij ≪ 1, the second<br />

term in Eq. (9.96) is <strong>of</strong> second order in h, so that at first order in h, Eq. (9.96) reduces to<br />

Fi ≃ ˜γij ˜ Γ j . Accordingly Shibata’s prescription (9.94) becomes<br />

∂β i<br />

∂t ≃ ˜ Γ i + ˜γ ij δt ∂Fj<br />

∂t<br />

. (9.97)<br />

If we disregard the δt term in the right-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>and</strong> take the time derivative <strong>of</strong> this equation,<br />

we obtain the Gamma-driver condition (9.89) with k = 1 <strong>and</strong> η = 0. The term in δt has been<br />

introduced by Shibata [228] in order to stabilize the <strong>numerical</strong> code.<br />

The spatial gauge (9.94) has been used by Shibata (2003) [228] <strong>and</strong> Sekiguchi <strong>and</strong> Shibata<br />

(2005) [221] to compute axisymmetric gravitational collapse <strong>of</strong> rapidly rotating neutron stars<br />

to black holes, as well as by Shibata <strong>and</strong> Sekiguchi (2005) [234] to compute 3D gravitational<br />

collapses, allowing for the development <strong>of</strong> nonaxisymmetric instabilities. It has also been used<br />

by Shibata, Taniguchi <strong>and</strong> Uryu (2003-2006) [237, 238, 236] to compute the merger <strong>of</strong> binary<br />

neutron stars, while their preceding computations [239, 240] rely on the approximate minimal<br />

distortion gauge (Sec. 9.3.3).<br />

4 let us recall that D i := f ij Dj

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!