20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9.2 Choice <strong>of</strong> foliation 159<br />

type ∂N/∂λ in the right-h<strong>and</strong> side <strong>and</strong> to compute the “λ-evolution” for some range <strong>of</strong> the<br />

parameter λ. This amounts to resolve a heat like equation. Generically the solution converges<br />

towards a stationary one, so that ∂N/∂λ → 0 <strong>and</strong> the original elliptic equation (9.15) is solved.<br />

The approximate maximal slicing has been used by Shibata, Uryu <strong>and</strong> Taniguchi to compute<br />

the merger <strong>of</strong> binary neutron stars [226, 239, 240, 237, 238, 236], as well as by Shibata <strong>and</strong><br />

Sekiguchi for 2D (axisymmetric) gravitational collapses [227, 228, 221] or 3D ones [234].<br />

9.2.3 Harmonic slicing<br />

Another important category <strong>of</strong> time slicing is deduced from the st<strong>and</strong>ard harmonic or De<br />

Donder condition for the spacetime coordinates (x α ):<br />

gx α = 0, (9.23)<br />

where g := ∇µ∇ µ is the d’Alembertian associated with the metric g <strong>and</strong> each coordinate<br />

x α is considered as a scalar field on M. Harmonic coordinates have been introduced by De<br />

Donder in 1921 [106] <strong>and</strong> have played an important role in theoretical developments, notably in<br />

Choquet-Bruhat’s demonstration (1952, [127]) <strong>of</strong> the well-posedness <strong>of</strong> the Cauchy problem for<br />

<strong>3+1</strong> Einstein equations (cf. Sec. 4.4.4).<br />

The harmonic slicing is defined by requiring that the harmonic condition holds for the<br />

x 0 = t coordinate, but not necessarily for the other coordinates, leaving the freedom to choose<br />

any coordinate (x i ) in each hypersurface Σt:<br />

gt = 0 . (9.24)<br />

Using the st<strong>and</strong>ard expression for the d’Alembertian, we get<br />

1 ∂<br />

√<br />

−g ∂x µ<br />

<br />

√−gg µν ∂t<br />

∂xν <br />

=δ0 <br />

= 0, (9.25)<br />

ν<br />

i.e.<br />

∂<br />

∂x µ<br />

√ µ0<br />

−gg = 0. (9.26)<br />

Thanks to the relation √ −g = N √ γ [Eq. (4.55)], this equation becomes<br />

∂ √ 00<br />

N γg<br />

∂t<br />

+ ∂<br />

∂xi √ i0<br />

N γg = 0. (9.27)<br />

From the expression <strong>of</strong> g αβ given by Eq. (4.49), g 00 = −1/N 2 <strong>and</strong> g i0 = β i /N 2 . Thus<br />

Exp<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> reordering gives<br />

∂N<br />

∂t<br />

− ∂<br />

∂t<br />

√ γ<br />

− βi∂N − N<br />

∂xi N<br />

<br />

+ ∂<br />

∂x i<br />

√ γ<br />

N βi<br />

<br />

1 ∂<br />

√γ<br />

√ γ 1<br />

−<br />

∂t<br />

<br />

= 0. (9.28)<br />

∂<br />

√<br />

γ ∂xi √ i<br />

γβ <br />

<br />

=Diβi <br />

= 0. (9.29)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!