3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ... 3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

luth.obspm.fr
from luth.obspm.fr More from this publisher
20.07.2013 Views

154 Choice of foliation and spatial coordinates Figure 9.2: Deformation of a volume V delimited by the surface S in the hypersurface Σ0. these coordinates does not depend upon t. The vector ∂t associated to these coordinates is then related to the displacement vector v by v = δt ∂t. (9.6) Introducing the lapse function N and shift vector β associated with the coordinates (t,x i ), the above relation becomes [cf. Eq. (4.31)] v = δt (Nn + β). Accordingly, the condition v| S = 0 implies N| S = 0 and β| S = 0. (9.7) Let us define V (t) as the volume of the domain Vt delimited by S in Σt. It is given by a formula identical to Eq. (9.5), except of course that the integration domain has to be replaced by Vt. Moreover, the domains Vt lying at fixed values of the coordinates (x i ), we have dV dt = Now, contracting Eq. (4.63) with γ ij and using Eq. (4.62), we get From the general rule (6.64) for the variation of a determinant, so that Eq. (9.9) becomes Vt ∂ √ γ ∂t d3 x. (9.8) ij ∂ γ ∂t γij = −2NK + 2Diβ i . (9.9) ij ∂ γ ∂t γij = ∂ 2 (ln γ) = √ ∂t γ ∂ √ γ , (9.10) ∂t 1 ∂ √ γ √ γ ∂t = −NK + Diβ i . (9.11) Let us use this relation to express Eq. (9.8) as dV dt = −NK + Diβ i √ 3 γ d x. (9.12) Vt

Now from the Gauss-Ostrogradsky theorem, Diβ i√ γ d 3 x = Vt 9.2 Choice of foliation 155 S β i √ 2 si q d y, (9.13) where s is the unit normal to S lying in Σt, q is the induced metric on S, (ya ) are coordinates on S and q = detqab. Since β vanishes on S [property (9.7)], the above integral is identically zero and Eq. (9.12) reduces to dV dt = − Vt NK √ γ d 3 x . (9.14) We conclude that if K = 0 on Σ0, the volume V enclosed in S is extremal with respect to variations of the domain delimited by S, provided that the boundary of the domain remains S. In the Euclidean space, such an extremum would define a minimal surface, the corresponding variation problem being a Plateau problem [named after the Belgian physicist Joseph Plateau (1801-1883)]: given a closed contour S (wire loop), find the surface V (soap film) of minimal area (minimal surface tension energy) bounded by S. However, in the present case of a metric of Lorentzian signature, it can be shown that the extremum is actually a maximum, hence the name maximal slicing. For the same reason, a timelike geodesic between two points in spacetime is the curve of maximum length joining these two points. Demanding that the maximal slicing condition (9.4) holds for all hypersurfaces Σt, once combined with the evolution equation (6.90) for K, yields the following elliptic equation for the lapse function: DiD i N = N 4π(E + S) + KijK ij . (9.15) Remark : We have already noticed that at the Newtonian limit, Eq. (9.15) reduces to the Poisson equation for the gravitational potential Φ (cf. Sec. 6.5.1). Therefore the maximal slicing can be considered as a natural generalization to the relativistic case of the canonical slicing of Newtonian spacetime by hypersurfaces of constant absolute time. In this respect, let us notice that the “beyond Newtonian” approximation of general relativity constituted by the Isenberg-Wilson-Mathews approach discussed in Sec. 6.6 is also based on maximal slicing. Example : In Schwarzschild spacetime, the standard Schwarzschild time coordinate t defines maximal hypersurfaces Σt, which are spacelike for R > 2m (R being Schwarzschild radial coordinate). Indeed these hypersurfaces are totally geodesic: K = 0 (cf. § 2.4.3), so that, in particular, K = trγK = 0. This maximal slicing is shown in Fig. 9.3. The corresponding lapse function expressed in terms of the isotropic radial coordinate r is N = 1 − m 1 + 2r m −1 . (9.16) 2r As shown in Sec. 8.3.3, the above expression can be derived by means of the XCTS formalism. Notice that the foliation (Σt)t∈R does not penetrate under the event horizon (R = 2m) and that the lapse is negative for r < m/2 (cf. discussion in Sec. 8.3.3 about negative lapse values).

Now from the Gauss-Ostrogradsky theorem,<br />

<br />

Diβ i√ γ d 3 <br />

x =<br />

Vt<br />

9.2 Choice <strong>of</strong> foliation 155<br />

S<br />

β i √ 2<br />

si q d y, (9.13)<br />

where s is the unit normal to S lying in Σt, q is the induced metric on S, (ya ) are coordinates<br />

on S <strong>and</strong> q = detqab. Since β vanishes on S [property (9.7)], the above integral is identically<br />

zero <strong>and</strong> Eq. (9.12) reduces to<br />

dV<br />

dt<br />

<br />

= −<br />

Vt<br />

NK √ γ d 3 x . (9.14)<br />

We conclude that if K = 0 on Σ0, the volume V enclosed in S is extremal with respect to<br />

variations <strong>of</strong> the domain delimited by S, provided that the boundary <strong>of</strong> the domain remains S.<br />

In the Euclidean space, such an extremum would define a minimal surface, the corresponding<br />

variation problem being a Plateau problem [named after the Belgian physicist Joseph Plateau<br />

(1801-1883)]: given a closed contour S (wire loop), find the surface V (soap film) <strong>of</strong> minimal<br />

area (minimal surface tension energy) bounded by S. However, in the present case <strong>of</strong> a metric<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lorentzian signature, it can be shown that the extremum is actually a maximum, hence the<br />

name maximal slicing. For the same reason, a timelike geodesic between two points in spacetime<br />

is the curve <strong>of</strong> maximum length joining these two points.<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong>ing that the maximal slicing condition (9.4) holds for all hypersurfaces Σt, once<br />

combined with the evolution equation (6.90) for K, yields the following elliptic equation for the<br />

lapse function:<br />

DiD i N = N 4π(E + S) + KijK ij . (9.15)<br />

Remark : We have already noticed that at the Newtonian limit, Eq. (9.15) reduces to the<br />

Poisson equation for the gravitational potential Φ (cf. Sec. 6.5.1). Therefore the maximal<br />

slicing can be considered as a natural generalization to the relativistic case <strong>of</strong> the canonical<br />

slicing <strong>of</strong> Newtonian spacetime by hypersurfaces <strong>of</strong> constant absolute time. In this respect,<br />

let us notice that the “beyond Newtonian” approximation <strong>of</strong> general <strong>relativity</strong> constituted<br />

by the Isenberg-Wilson-Mathews approach discussed in Sec. 6.6 is also based on maximal<br />

slicing.<br />

Example : In Schwarzschild spacetime, the st<strong>and</strong>ard Schwarzschild time coordinate t defines<br />

maximal hypersurfaces Σt, which are spacelike for R > 2m (R being Schwarzschild radial<br />

coordinate). Indeed these hypersurfaces are totally geodesic: K = 0 (cf. § 2.4.3), so<br />

that, in particular, K = trγK = 0. This maximal slicing is shown in Fig. 9.3. The<br />

corresponding lapse function expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the isotropic radial coordinate r is<br />

<br />

N = 1 − m<br />

<br />

1 +<br />

2r<br />

m<br />

−1 . (9.16)<br />

2r<br />

As shown in Sec. 8.3.3, the above expression can be derived by means <strong>of</strong> the XCTS <strong>formalism</strong>.<br />

Notice that the foliation (Σt)t∈R does not penetrate under the event horizon (R = 2m)<br />

<strong>and</strong> that the lapse is negative for r < m/2 (cf. discussion in Sec. 8.3.3 about negative lapse<br />

values).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!