3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
152 Choice <strong>of</strong> foliation <strong>and</strong> spatial coordinates<br />
9.2 Choice <strong>of</strong> foliation<br />
9.2.1 Geodesic slicing<br />
The simplest choice <strong>of</strong> foliation one might think about is the geodesic slicing, for it corresponds<br />
to a unit lapse:<br />
N = 1 . (9.1)<br />
Since the 4-acceleration a <strong>of</strong> the Eulerian observers is nothing but the spatial gradient <strong>of</strong> ln N<br />
[cf. Eq. (3.18)], the choice (9.1) implies a = 0, i.e. the worldlines <strong>of</strong> the Eulerian observers are<br />
geodesics, hence the name geodesic slicing. Moreover the choice (9.1) implies that the proper<br />
time along these worldlines coincides with the coordinate time t.<br />
We have already used the geodesic slicing to discuss the basics feature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>3+1</strong> Einstein<br />
system in Sec. 4.4.2. We have also argued there that, due to the tendency <strong>of</strong> timelike geodesics<br />
without vorticity (as the worldlines <strong>of</strong> the Eulerian observers are) to focus <strong>and</strong> eventually cross,<br />
this type <strong>of</strong> foliation can become pathological within a finite range <strong>of</strong> t.<br />
Example : A simple example <strong>of</strong> geodesic slicing is provided by the use <strong>of</strong> Painlevé-Gullstr<strong>and</strong><br />
coordinates (t,R,θ,ϕ) in Schwarzschild spacetime (see e.g. Ref. [185]). These coordinates<br />
are defined as follows: R is nothing but the st<strong>and</strong>ard Schwarzschild radial coordinate 1 ,<br />
whereas the Painlevé-Gullstr<strong>and</strong> coordinate t is related to the Schwarzschild time coordinate<br />
tS by<br />
<br />
R 1<br />
t = tS + 4m +<br />
2m 2 ln<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
R/2m − 1<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
. (9.2)<br />
R/2m + 1<br />
The metric components with respect to Painlevé-Gullstr<strong>and</strong> coordinates are extremely simple,<br />
being given by<br />
gµνdx µ dx ν = −dt 2 <br />
2m<br />
+ dR +<br />
R dt<br />
2 + R 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θ dϕ 2 ). (9.3)<br />
By comparing with the general line element (4.48), we read on the above expression that<br />
N = 1, β i = ( 2m/R,0,0) <strong>and</strong> γij = diag(1,R 2 ,R 2 sin 2 θ). Thus the hypersurfaces<br />
t = const are geodesic slices. Notice that the induced metric γ is flat.<br />
Example : Another example <strong>of</strong> geodesic slicing, still in Schwarzschild spacetime, is provided<br />
by the time development with N = 1 <strong>of</strong> the initial data constructed in Secs. 8.2.5 <strong>and</strong><br />
8.3.3, namely the momentarily static slice tS = 0 <strong>of</strong> Schwarzschild spacetime, with topology<br />
R × S 2 (Einstein-Rosen bridge). The resulting foliation is depicted in Fig. 9.1. It hits the<br />
singularity at t = πm, reflecting the bad behavior <strong>of</strong> geodesic slicing.<br />
In <strong>numerical</strong> <strong>relativity</strong>, geodesic slicings have been used by Nakamura, Oohara <strong>and</strong> Kojima<br />
to perform in 1987 the first 3D evolutions <strong>of</strong> vacuum spacetimes with gravitational waves [193].<br />
However, as discussed in Ref. [233], the evolution was possible only for a pretty limited range <strong>of</strong><br />
t, because <strong>of</strong> the focusing property mentioned above.<br />
1 in this chapter, we systematically use the notation R for Schwarzschild radial coordinate (areal radius), leaving<br />
the notation r for other types <strong>of</strong> radial coordinates, such that the isotropic one [cf. Eq. (6.24)]