20.07.2013 Views

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

3+1 formalism and bases of numerical relativity - LUTh ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 Asymptotic flatness <strong>and</strong> global quantities<br />

For the IWM approximation <strong>of</strong> general <strong>relativity</strong> considered in Sec. 6.6, the coordinates<br />

belong to the quasi-isotropic gauge (since ˜γ = f), so we may apply (7.69). Moreover, as a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> ˜γ = f, ˜ R = 0 <strong>and</strong> in the IWM approximation, K = 0. Therefore Eq. (7.69)<br />

simplifies to<br />

<br />

MADM =<br />

Σt<br />

<br />

Ψ 5 E + 1<br />

16π Âij Âij Ψ −7<br />

<br />

˜γ<br />

3<br />

d x + MH. (7.70)<br />

Within the framework <strong>of</strong> exact general <strong>relativity</strong>, the above formula is valid for any maximal<br />

slice Σt with a conformally flat metric.<br />

7.6 Komar mass <strong>and</strong> angular momentum<br />

In the case where the spacetime (M,g) has some symmetries, one may define global quantities<br />

in a coordinate-independent way by means <strong>of</strong> a general technique introduced by Komar (1959)<br />

[172]. It consists in taking flux integrals <strong>of</strong> the derivative <strong>of</strong> the Killing vector associated with the<br />

symmetry over closed 2-surfaces surrounding the matter sources. The quantities thus obtained<br />

are conserved in the sense that they do not depend upon the choice <strong>of</strong> the integration 2-surface,<br />

as long as the latter stays outside the matter. We discuss here two important cases: the Komar<br />

mass resulting from time symmetry (stationarity) <strong>and</strong> the Komar angular momentum resulting<br />

from axisymmetry.<br />

7.6.1 Komar mass<br />

Let us assume that the spacetime (M,g) is stationary. This means that the metric tensor g is<br />

invariant by Lie transport along the field lines <strong>of</strong> a timelike vector field k. The latter is called a<br />

Killing vector. Provided that it is normalized so that k · k = −1 at spatial infinity, it is then<br />

unique. Given a <strong>3+1</strong> foliation (Σt)t∈R <strong>of</strong> M, <strong>and</strong> a closed 2-surface St in Σt, with the topology<br />

<strong>of</strong> a sphere, the Komar mass is defined by<br />

with the 2-surface element<br />

MK := − 1<br />

<br />

∇<br />

8π St<br />

µ k ν dSµν , (7.71)<br />

dSµν = (sµnν − nµsν) √ q d 2 y, (7.72)<br />

where n is the unit timelike normal to Σt, s is the unit normal to St within Σt oriented towards<br />

the exterior <strong>of</strong> St, (y a ) = (y 1 ,y 2 ) are coordinates spanning St, <strong>and</strong> q := det(qab), the qab’s being<br />

the components with respect to (y a ) <strong>of</strong> the metric q induced by γ (or equivalently by g) on St.<br />

Actually the Komar mass can be defined over any closed 2-surface, but in the present context<br />

it is quite natural to consider only 2-surfaces lying in the hypersurfaces <strong>of</strong> the <strong>3+1</strong> foliation.<br />

A priori the quantity MK as defined by (7.71) should depend on the choice <strong>of</strong> the 2-surface St.<br />

However, thanks to the fact that k is a Killing vector, this is not the case, as long as St is located<br />

outside any matter content <strong>of</strong> spacetime. In order to show this, let us transform the surface<br />

integral (7.71) into a volume integral. As in Sec. 7.5.3, we suppose that Σt is diffeomorphic to<br />

either R 3 or R 3 minus one hole, the results being easily generalized to an arbitrary number <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!