Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH
Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH
Method of variation of constants (l) are periodic in l with a period of 2π. n denotes the unperturbed ‘mean motion’, given by n = 2π P , P being the radial (periastron to periastron) period, while k = ∆Φ/2π, ∆Φ being the advance of the periastron in the time interval P . Functions S(l) and W (l) and therefore ∂S ∂l (l) and ∂W ∂l Angles l and λ satisfy, for the unperturbed system, ˙ l = n and ˙λ = (1 + k)n, which integrate to l = n(t − t0) + cl , λ = (1 + k)n(t − t0) + cλ , t0 some initial instant and the constants cl and cλ, corresponding values for l and λ. Unperturbed solution depends on four integration constants: c1, c2, cl and cλ. BRI-IHP06-I – p.104/??
Method of variation of constants At 2PN, one can write down explicit expressions for the functions S(l) and W (l). GQKR yields: S(l; c1, c2) = ar(1 − er cos u) , W (l; c1, c2) = (1 + k)(v − l) + fφ c 4 sin 2v + gφ sin 3v , c4 where v and u are some 2PN accurate true and eccentric anomalies, which must be expressed as functions of l, c1, and c2, say v = V(l; c1, c2) = V (U(l; c1, c2)) and u = U(l; c1, c2). ar and er are some 2PN accurate semi-major axis and radial eccentricity, while fφ and gφ are certain functions, given in terms of c1 and c2. v = V (u) ≡ 2 arctan 1 + eφ 1 − eφ 1/2 tan u . 2 Fn u = U(l) defined by inverting the ‘Kepler equation’ l = l(u) l = u − et sin u + ft gt sin V (u) + c4 c4 (V (u) − u) . BRI-IHP06-I – p.105/??
- Page 55 and 56: Gauge Invariant Variables < ˙ E3PN
- Page 57 and 58: Hereditary Contributions F 3PN tail
- Page 59 and 60: Log terms in total energy flux Summ
- Page 61 and 62: Log terms in total energy flux FZ t
- Page 63 and 64: Complete 3PN energy flux - Mhar <
- Page 65 and 66: Complete 3PN energy flux - Mhar <
- Page 67 and 68: Present Work Extends the circular o
- Page 69 and 70: Angular Momentum Flux Hereditary co
- Page 71 and 72: Far Zone Angular Momentum Flux dJi
- Page 73 and 74: Far Zone Angular Momentum Flux dJi
- Page 75 and 76: 3PN AMFlux - Shar dJi dt dJi dt
- Page 77 and 78: Orbital Averaged AMF - ADM Using th
- Page 79 and 80: Orbital Averaged AMF - ADM 〈 dJ d
- Page 81 and 82: Orbital Averaged AMF - ADM 〈 dJ d
- Page 83 and 84: Evoln of orbital elements under GRR
- Page 85 and 86: Evoln of orbital element n under GR
- Page 87 and 88: Evoln of orbital element n under GR
- Page 89 and 90: Evoln of orbital element et under G
- Page 91 and 92: Evoln of orbital element ar under G
- Page 93 and 94: Evoln of orbital element ar under G
- Page 95 and 96: PART II Based on Phasing of Gravita
- Page 97 and 98: Beyond Orbital Averages Going beyon
- Page 99 and 100: Phasing of GWF TT radn field is giv
- Page 101 and 102: Phasing of GWF Orbital phase = φ,
- Page 103 and 104: Method of variation of constants A
- Page 105: Method of variation of constants c1
- Page 109 and 110: Method of variation of constants An
- Page 111 and 112: Method of variation of constants Al
- Page 113 and 114: Method of variation of constants Fo
- Page 115 and 116: Method of variation of constants Du
- Page 117 and 118: Implementation Compute 3PN accurate
- Page 119 and 120: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 121 and 122: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 123 and 124: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 125 and 126: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 127 and 128: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 129 and 130: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics A
- Page 131 and 132: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics Fi
- Page 133 and 134: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics dc
- Page 135 and 136: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics 4
- Page 137 and 138: Secular variations d¯n dt dēt dt
- Page 139 and 140: Periodic variations To complete thi
- Page 141 and 142: Periodic variations One can analyti
- Page 143 and 144: Periodic variations ˜cl = − 2ξ5
- Page 145 and 146: Periodic variations Above results m
- Page 147 and 148: Periodic variations ˜ l(l; ¯ca) =
- Page 149 and 150: ¯n/ni and ñ/n versus l/(2π) n /
- Page 151 and 152: h+(t) and h×(t) Scaled h + (t) Sca
- Page 153 and 154: ¯n/ni and ñ/n ēt and ˜et versus
- Page 155 and 156: ¯cl and ˜cl ¯cλ and ˜cλ versu
Method of variation of constants<br />
(l) are<br />
periodic <strong>in</strong> l with a period of 2π. n denotes the unperturbed<br />
‘mean motion’, given by n = 2π<br />
P , P be<strong>in</strong>g the radial<br />
(periastron to periastron) period, while k = ∆Φ/2π, ∆Φ be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the advance of the periastron <strong>in</strong> the time <strong>in</strong>terval P .<br />
Functions S(l) and W (l) and therefore ∂S<br />
∂l<br />
(l) and ∂W<br />
∂l<br />
Angles l and λ satisfy, for the unperturbed system, ˙ l = n and<br />
˙λ = (1 + k)n, which <strong>in</strong>tegrate to<br />
l = n(t − t0) + cl ,<br />
λ = (1 + k)n(t − t0) + cλ ,<br />
t0 some <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>stant and the constants cl and cλ,<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g values for l and λ. Unperturbed solution<br />
depends on four <strong>in</strong>tegration constants: c1, c2, cl and cλ.<br />
BRI-IHP06-I – p.104/??