Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH
Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH
Phasing of GWF h+,×(r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) = 1 c4 h 0 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + 1 c h1 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + 1 + 1 c 3 h3 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + 1 c 4 h4 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + · · · c 2 h2 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) Choose convention: N from the source to the observer and p toward the correspondingly defined ‘ascending’ node x = p r cos φ + (q cos i + N sin i)r sin φ, i = inclination of orbital plane wrt plane of sky 1 c4 h0 + (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) = G m η − c4 R ′ (1 + C 2 G m ) r + r2 φ˙ 2 2 − ˙r +S 2 G m r − r2 φ˙ 2 2 − ˙r , 1 c4 h0 × (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ G m η C φ) = −2 c4 R ′ C = cos i and S = sin i G m r + r2 ˙ φ 2 − ˙r 2 . cos 2 φ + 2 ˙r r ˙ φ sin 2 φ sin 2φ − 2 ˙r r ˙ φ cos 2φ BRI-IHP06-I – p.98/?? ,
Phasing of GWF Orbital phase = φ, ˙ φ = dφ/dt and ˙r = dr/dt = n · v, where v = p ( ˙r cos φ − r ˙ φ sin φ) + (q cos i + N sin i) ( ˙r sin φ + r ˙ φ cos φ). Must be supplemented by explicit expressions describing the temporal evolution of the relative motion, i.e. describing the explicit time dependences r(t), φ(t), ˙r(t), and ˙ φ(t). Refer to as phasing, any explicit way to define the latter time-dependences, because it is the crucial input needed beyond the ‘amplitude’ expansions, given by to derive some ready to use waveforms h+,×(t). Structure for GW polarization amplitudes has only the relative motion x, v, because one go to a suitable center-of-mass frame .. Validity of a CM theorem .. O(c −7 ) ‘recoil’ of the center-of-mass is expected to influence the waveform only at the O(c −8 ) level. Time-dependent recoil of the latter rest frame will introduce both a N · vCM/c Doppler shift of the phasing and a corresponding modification of the amplitudes h+,×. BRI-IHP06-I – p.99/??
- Page 49 and 50: Comments Note: No term at 2.5PN. 2.
- Page 51 and 52: Comments Useful internal consistenc
- Page 53 and 54: Gauge Invariant Variables < ˙ E >
- Page 55 and 56: Gauge Invariant Variables < ˙ E3PN
- Page 57 and 58: Hereditary Contributions F 3PN tail
- Page 59 and 60: Log terms in total energy flux Summ
- Page 61 and 62: Log terms in total energy flux FZ t
- Page 63 and 64: Complete 3PN energy flux - Mhar <
- Page 65 and 66: Complete 3PN energy flux - Mhar <
- Page 67 and 68: Present Work Extends the circular o
- Page 69 and 70: Angular Momentum Flux Hereditary co
- Page 71 and 72: Far Zone Angular Momentum Flux dJi
- Page 73 and 74: Far Zone Angular Momentum Flux dJi
- Page 75 and 76: 3PN AMFlux - Shar dJi dt dJi dt
- Page 77 and 78: Orbital Averaged AMF - ADM Using th
- Page 79 and 80: Orbital Averaged AMF - ADM 〈 dJ d
- Page 81 and 82: Orbital Averaged AMF - ADM 〈 dJ d
- Page 83 and 84: Evoln of orbital elements under GRR
- Page 85 and 86: Evoln of orbital element n under GR
- Page 87 and 88: Evoln of orbital element n under GR
- Page 89 and 90: Evoln of orbital element et under G
- Page 91 and 92: Evoln of orbital element ar under G
- Page 93 and 94: Evoln of orbital element ar under G
- Page 95 and 96: PART II Based on Phasing of Gravita
- Page 97 and 98: Beyond Orbital Averages Going beyon
- Page 99: Phasing of GWF TT radn field is giv
- Page 103 and 104: Method of variation of constants A
- Page 105 and 106: Method of variation of constants c1
- Page 107 and 108: Method of variation of constants At
- Page 109 and 110: Method of variation of constants An
- Page 111 and 112: Method of variation of constants Al
- Page 113 and 114: Method of variation of constants Fo
- Page 115 and 116: Method of variation of constants Du
- Page 117 and 118: Implementation Compute 3PN accurate
- Page 119 and 120: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 121 and 122: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 123 and 124: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 125 and 126: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 127 and 128: 3PN accurate conservative dynamics
- Page 129 and 130: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics A
- Page 131 and 132: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics Fi
- Page 133 and 134: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics dc
- Page 135 and 136: 3.5PN accurate reactive dynamics 4
- Page 137 and 138: Secular variations d¯n dt dēt dt
- Page 139 and 140: Periodic variations To complete thi
- Page 141 and 142: Periodic variations One can analyti
- Page 143 and 144: Periodic variations ˜cl = − 2ξ5
- Page 145 and 146: Periodic variations Above results m
- Page 147 and 148: Periodic variations ˜ l(l; ¯ca) =
- Page 149 and 150: ¯n/ni and ñ/n versus l/(2π) n /
Phas<strong>in</strong>g of GWF<br />
Orbital phase = φ, ˙ φ = dφ/dt and ˙r = dr/dt = n · v, where<br />
v = p ( ˙r cos φ − r ˙ φ s<strong>in</strong> φ) + (q cos i + N s<strong>in</strong> i) ( ˙r s<strong>in</strong> φ + r ˙ φ cos φ).<br />
Must be supplemented by explicit expressions describ<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
temporal evolution of the relative motion, i.e. describ<strong>in</strong>g the explicit<br />
time dependences r(t), φ(t), ˙r(t), and ˙ φ(t).<br />
Refer to as phas<strong>in</strong>g, any explicit way to def<strong>in</strong>e the latter<br />
time-dependences, because it is the crucial <strong>in</strong>put needed beyond<br />
the ‘amplitude’ expansions, given by to derive some ready to use<br />
waveforms h+,×(t).<br />
Structure for GW polarization amplitudes has only the relative<br />
motion x, v, because one go to a suitable center-of-mass frame ..<br />
Validity of a CM theorem .. O(c −7 ) ‘recoil’ of the center-of-mass is<br />
expected to <strong>in</strong>fluence the waveform only at the O(c −8 ) level.<br />
Time-dependent recoil of the latter rest frame will <strong>in</strong>troduce both a<br />
N · vCM/c Doppler shift of the phas<strong>in</strong>g and a correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
modification of the amplitudes h+,×.<br />
BRI-IHP06-I – p.99/??