Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH

Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH Gravitational Waves from Inspiralling Compact Binaries in ... - LUTH

luth.obspm.fr
from luth.obspm.fr More from this publisher
20.07.2013 Views

Phasing of GWF h+,×(r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) = 1 c4 h 0 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + 1 c h1 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + 1 + 1 c 3 h3 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + 1 c 4 h4 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) + · · · c 2 h2 +,× (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) Choose convention: N from the source to the observer and p toward the correspondingly defined ‘ascending’ node x = p r cos φ + (q cos i + N sin i)r sin φ, i = inclination of orbital plane wrt plane of sky 1 c4 h0 + (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ φ) = G m η − c4 R ′ (1 + C 2 G m ) r + r2 φ˙ 2 2 − ˙r +S 2 G m r − r2 φ˙ 2 2 − ˙r , 1 c4 h0 × (r, φ, ˙r, ˙ G m η C φ) = −2 c4 R ′ C = cos i and S = sin i G m r + r2 ˙ φ 2 − ˙r 2 . cos 2 φ + 2 ˙r r ˙ φ sin 2 φ sin 2φ − 2 ˙r r ˙ φ cos 2φ BRI-IHP06-I – p.98/?? ,

Phasing of GWF Orbital phase = φ, ˙ φ = dφ/dt and ˙r = dr/dt = n · v, where v = p ( ˙r cos φ − r ˙ φ sin φ) + (q cos i + N sin i) ( ˙r sin φ + r ˙ φ cos φ). Must be supplemented by explicit expressions describing the temporal evolution of the relative motion, i.e. describing the explicit time dependences r(t), φ(t), ˙r(t), and ˙ φ(t). Refer to as phasing, any explicit way to define the latter time-dependences, because it is the crucial input needed beyond the ‘amplitude’ expansions, given by to derive some ready to use waveforms h+,×(t). Structure for GW polarization amplitudes has only the relative motion x, v, because one go to a suitable center-of-mass frame .. Validity of a CM theorem .. O(c −7 ) ‘recoil’ of the center-of-mass is expected to influence the waveform only at the O(c −8 ) level. Time-dependent recoil of the latter rest frame will introduce both a N · vCM/c Doppler shift of the phasing and a corresponding modification of the amplitudes h+,×. BRI-IHP06-I – p.99/??

Phas<strong>in</strong>g of GWF<br />

Orbital phase = φ, ˙ φ = dφ/dt and ˙r = dr/dt = n · v, where<br />

v = p ( ˙r cos φ − r ˙ φ s<strong>in</strong> φ) + (q cos i + N s<strong>in</strong> i) ( ˙r s<strong>in</strong> φ + r ˙ φ cos φ).<br />

Must be supplemented by explicit expressions describ<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

temporal evolution of the relative motion, i.e. describ<strong>in</strong>g the explicit<br />

time dependences r(t), φ(t), ˙r(t), and ˙ φ(t).<br />

Refer to as phas<strong>in</strong>g, any explicit way to def<strong>in</strong>e the latter<br />

time-dependences, because it is the crucial <strong>in</strong>put needed beyond<br />

the ‘amplitude’ expansions, given by to derive some ready to use<br />

waveforms h+,×(t).<br />

Structure for GW polarization amplitudes has only the relative<br />

motion x, v, because one go to a suitable center-of-mass frame ..<br />

Validity of a CM theorem .. O(c −7 ) ‘recoil’ of the center-of-mass is<br />

expected to <strong>in</strong>fluence the waveform only at the O(c −8 ) level.<br />

Time-dependent recoil of the latter rest frame will <strong>in</strong>troduce both a<br />

N · vCM/c Doppler shift of the phas<strong>in</strong>g and a correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

modification of the amplitudes h+,×.<br />

BRI-IHP06-I – p.99/??

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!