20.07.2013 Views

The Cosmic Flows project : voyage to the Great Attractor - LUTH

The Cosmic Flows project : voyage to the Great Attractor - LUTH

The Cosmic Flows project : voyage to the Great Attractor - LUTH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Cosmic</strong> <strong>Flows</strong> <strong>project</strong> : <strong>voyage</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Hélėne Cour<strong>to</strong>is<br />

Ass. Prof University of Lyon, France<br />

Research associate, Institute for Astronomy, Hawaii, USA<br />

Worshop Structure of <strong>the</strong> Universe, Obs Paris Nov 28, 2012


2D 3D 4D<br />

Cosmography : mapping with dynamics.<br />

Cosmology question : what is <strong>the</strong> cause of <strong>the</strong> CMB motion at 630 km/s?


<strong>The</strong> large scale cosmic flows constraints on neutrinos<br />

V expansion = H 0 * distance + V peculiar<br />

Peculiar velocities are only due <strong>to</strong> gravitational interactions.<br />

Our Galaxy has high deviant motion of 630 km/s w.r.t. <strong>the</strong> CMB dipole (Fixsen et al. 1996)<br />

Decomposition in<strong>to</strong> components:<br />

- Infall <strong>to</strong>wards Virgo cluster at 16 Mpc: ~ 140 km/s (Karachentsev et al. 2010)<br />

- Motion away from a large Local Void (Tully, Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2008)<br />

- <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r at ~ 50 Mpc (Lilje et al. 1986; Lynden-Bell et al. 1988)<br />

- Perseus/Pisces cluster at <strong>the</strong> opposite side (Hanski et al. 2001)<br />

- Shapley concentration at ~ 150 Mpc ?(Pike & Hudson 2005; Erdoğdu et al. 2006; Bilicki et<br />

al. 2011)<br />

Observed components cannot explain <strong>the</strong> flow? (Lavaux et al. 2010; Nusser & Davis 2011;<br />

Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2012)


SFI++<br />

Masters, Springob, Haynes, Giovanelli,<br />

2006 ApJ 653, 861<br />

Kraan-Korteweg, 2011, arXiv1107.1069<br />

We are traveling with <strong>the</strong> Local Sheet as a unit<br />

<strong>The</strong> Local Sheet is a wall bounding <strong>the</strong> Local Void which is pushing us away<br />

Edge-on <strong>to</strong> Supergalactic plane<br />

Tully, Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2008 ApJ 676, 184


2004 : Advent of <strong>the</strong> new giant radiotelescopes : GBT, Arecibo refurbished, Parkes mulGbeam<br />

2006-­‐2008 : catalog of 1,800 accurate galaxy distances: cosmicflows-­‐1<br />

median error on <strong>the</strong> peculiar velociGes 13%<br />

2012 : cosmicflows-­‐2 with 7,000 distances up <strong>to</strong> 80 Mpc<br />

(more than 1,000 hrs at GBT and 200 hrs at Parkes, 30 nights at UH2.2m, 1,800 poinGngs with Spitzer)<br />

Radioastronomy : D. Makarov, I. Karachentsev, S. Mitronova, B. Koribalski, R. Kraan-­‐Korteweg<br />

Pho<strong>to</strong>metry ground + Spitzer + WISE : E. Shaya, T. Jarre^, M. Seibert, W. Freedman, B. Madore, E. Persson, K. Sheth<br />

Analysis : S. Go^loeber, Y. Hoffman, G. Yepes, D. Pomarede<br />

PhD Students B. Jacobs, M. Zagurski (USA), B. Depardon, N. Bonhomme, T. Doumler, J. Sorce (Lyon)


Observational methods :<br />

Distances = Peculiar velociGes<br />

V CMB = H 0 * d + V pec<br />

expansion gravitation<br />

V CMB : redshift surveys : only luminous matter, short range correlations<br />

V pec : peculiar velocities : trace full gravitational field : luminous + dark matter, no bias,<br />

long-range correlated fields<br />

Nearby 10 Mpc : Cepheids, Tip red giant branch (TRGB), Surface Brightness Fluctuations (SBF)<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r up <strong>to</strong> 200 Mpc :<br />

- SNIa : current data <strong>to</strong>o sparse, few hundreds in 8,000 km/s radius<br />

- Fundamental Plane: early types galaxies, in high density regions, not suitable for tracing <strong>the</strong><br />

flows, current data quite unreliable (6DF), half-sky<br />

- Tully-Fisher : inclined spiral galaxies, tracing <strong>the</strong> field where <strong>the</strong> eddy currents are displayed,<br />

high data number (several 10,000), distance accuracy < 15% and improving, all sky<br />

Very difficult <strong>to</strong> obtain : 2 accurate deep observations : pho<strong>to</strong>metry + radioastronomy


2008 : <strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-­‐1<br />

2012 : <strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-­‐2<br />

Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. AJ, 2009, 138, 1938<br />

Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2011 MNRAS 415,1935<br />

Sorce et al. arXiv:1208.3311 , arXiv:1208.3309<br />

Status of Current observaGonal surveys<br />

Data expands :<br />

Deep I band exposures (UH 2.2m) + HST + Spitzer<br />

Deep HI exposures, NRAO large program<br />

(+1,000 hrs GBT, Parkes, 200 nights/yr )


Simulated Universe CLUES<br />

Full 3D velocity<br />

Full 3D density<br />

TesGng <strong>the</strong> Wiener Filter reconstrucGon method<br />

Zaroubi et al. 1999 ApJ 520,413<br />

Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2012 ApJ 744,43<br />

Doumler et al. accepted MNRAS 2012<br />

Smoo<strong>the</strong>d at 10 Mpc<br />

Mock catalog : 1,800 radial velocities<br />

5-25% error, median 15%<br />

within 3,000 km/s<br />

…<br />

WF reconstruction:<br />

--> 3D vec<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

--> Full density


Results from cosmicflows-­‐1 in 2012: Expulsion from <strong>the</strong> Local Void.<br />

SGY-SGZ plane<br />

Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al, in prep


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Great</strong> A^rac<strong>to</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> XY plane<br />

Results from cosmicflows-­‐1 in 2012:<br />

Reconstructed ma^er density (luminous + dark ma^er) versus galaxy catalog


Results from cosmicflows-­‐1 in 2012:<br />

Reconstructed ma^er density (luminous + dark ma^er) versus galaxy catalog


Results from cosmicflows-­‐1 in 2012: Pushing <strong>the</strong> limits: outside <strong>the</strong> data-­‐zone<br />

Full Matter<br />

Div Tidal<br />

Cour<strong>to</strong>is et al. 2012 ApJ 744,43<br />

• <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r : direction<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> zone of<br />

avoidance<br />

• Some remaining tidal longrange<br />

velocity field ~ 90<br />

km/s


Results from cosmicflows-­‐1 in 2012: MRI or <strong>to</strong>mography of <strong>the</strong> Universe


Status of constrained simulaGons: http://www.clues-<strong>project</strong>.org/<br />

2009 : CLUES-­‐1 using MARKIII+SBF+Karachentsev peculiar velociGes<br />

2012 : CLUES-­‐2 using cosmicflows-­‐1 : 2,000 (20+%) all-­‐sky 40 Mpc<br />

2014 : CLUES-­‐3 using cosmicflows-­‐2 : 7,000 (10%) all-­‐sky 100 Mpc<br />

improvements on how <strong>to</strong> implement <strong>the</strong> constraints in <strong>the</strong> IniGal condiGons : RZA<br />

SimulaGons will contain Shapley, Peculiar Velocity Data will predict Shapley super-­‐cluster<br />

Do we reach <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> cosmic flow mo2on <strong>to</strong>wards <strong>the</strong> CMB?<br />

<strong>Great</strong><br />

Attrac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

CLUES-1 : 180 Mpc box<br />

Virgo<br />

Perseus


Constraint simulations using peculiar<br />

velocities in <strong>the</strong> Initial Conditions:<br />

WF + <strong>the</strong> back in time machine RZA


SGY [Mpc/h]<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

GA<br />

Test re-­‐simulaGons at z=0, box 160 Mpc/h Doumler et al. Accepted MNRAS 2012<br />

COMA<br />

LSC<br />

30<br />

60<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160<br />

SGX [Mpc/h]<br />

Original simulation full box<br />

PP<br />

log(δ+1)<br />

BOX160 2.5<br />

Y [Mpc/h]<br />

Y [Mpc/h]<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />

C30_10_II_A -0.5 (with RZA)<br />

Original simulation<br />

X [Mpc/h]<br />

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />

X [Mpc/h]<br />

Y [Mpc/h]<br />

Y [Mpc/h]<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

C30_10_I_A (without RZA)<br />

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />

Re-simulation X [Mpc/h] no RZA<br />

E60_10_II_A (with RZA)<br />

Re-simulation with a CF1 mock Re-simulation with a CF2 mock<br />

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110<br />

X [Mpc/h]<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0


CLUES 2<br />

A simulation of <strong>the</strong> Local Universe using cosmicflows-1 peculiar velocities as initial<br />

conditions (+WMAP7) with direct comparison <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed galaxy distribution (black<br />

dots) : only CDM.<br />

Preliminary results (last week) Sorce, Cour<strong>to</strong>is and CLUES collab<br />

nd generation<br />

What happens if we add a « pinch » of HDM<br />

or even if we try <strong>to</strong> revisit some WDM models ?<br />

Tikhonov et al. 2009, MNRAS 399, 1611<br />

WDM 1keV


CLUES 2 nd generation, some preliminary validity tests<br />

- Virgo Mass : 8 out on 10 simulations gives us a good Virgo at ~7-9.10^14 Msol in accordance with<br />

observational measurements of <strong>the</strong> Virgo Mass ~ 8.10^14 Msol<br />

- Peculiar velocities looks in accordance with <strong>the</strong> observations: amplitude and gaussianity<br />

<strong>the</strong>se tests are not final , run higher resolution simulations in order <strong>to</strong> check <strong>the</strong> halo numbers, masses etc ..<br />

Preliminary results , Sorce, Cour<strong>to</strong>is and CLUES collab<br />

Valageas arxiv1206.0554


Preliminary results (yesterday)<br />

Comparison between <strong>the</strong> average on 10 simulations and <strong>the</strong> observations: offset on <strong>the</strong><br />

Virgo cluster position : X+1, Y+1.5, Z+2.8 Mpc/h<br />

could be due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Non-Linear part of <strong>the</strong> peculiar motions : this is a well-known<br />

limitation of our WF+RZA code, that could be covered by a coupling with a Lagrangian<br />

perturbation <strong>the</strong>ory method<br />

we also need <strong>to</strong> check for <strong>the</strong> effect of shear and tidal field on <strong>the</strong> IC


CLUES 2 nd generation<br />

A simulation of <strong>the</strong> Local Universe using cosmicflows-1 peculiar velocities as initial<br />

conditions (+WMAP7) with direct comparison <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> observed galaxy distribution (white<br />

dots) : only CDM.<br />

Preliminary results (yesterday) Sorce, Cour<strong>to</strong>is and CLUES collab


CLUES Structure Formation with cold and warm Dark Matter http://www.clues-<strong>project</strong>.org/<br />

Evolution of <strong>the</strong> gas density in <strong>the</strong> Local Group for CDM (left) and WDM (right), 4096^3 resimulation,<br />

from z=41 <strong>to</strong> z=0. same color table and density scale was used.<br />

Cosmological Parameters<br />

Species WDM, 1 keV<br />

L box 64 Mpc/h<br />

Ω Λ 0.76<br />

Ω m 0.24<br />

Ω bar 0.0418<br />

h 0.73<br />

σ 8 0.75<br />

N 0.95<br />

Iseed 186592<br />

Spectrum EisHu approximation with an<br />

exponential cut-off according <strong>to</strong> a 1keV WDM<br />

particle


What is causing <strong>the</strong> tidal flow after 80 Mpc ?<br />

<strong>The</strong> Local Void in <strong>the</strong> YZ plane


Status of Current observaGonal surveys :<br />

<strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-­‐2 : Data ready 11,000 galaxies with accurate HI / 8,000 galaxies with deep I band and NIR Spitzer<br />

+ inclinaGon + pathological cases 5,000 thrown away ….<br />

40 Mpc 100 Mpc<br />

1,800 cosmicflows-­‐1 at 15% ~ 7,000 galaxy distances at < 10% (~ 2000 GBT)<br />

Peculiar Velocity Data include <strong>Great</strong> A>rac<strong>to</strong>r,<br />

reconstruc2on predicts Shapley?<br />

2008 2012


<strong>Cosmic</strong>flows-2 : TFR calibration in I band and 3.6 microns “L” band<br />

Tully and Cour<strong>to</strong>is, 2012 ApJ 749, 78<br />

Cour<strong>to</strong>is and Tully, 2012 ApJ, 749, 174<br />

H 0 = 75.9 ± 3.8 km.s −1 Mpc −1<br />

Sorce et al. 2012 AJ 144, 133<br />

Sorce et al. 2012 ApJ 758, 12


Preliminary results from cosmicflows-2 in 2013 : Reconstructed matter density<br />

(luminous + dark matter) versus galaxy catalog<br />

Coma<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Great</strong> A^rac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Perseus-­‐Pisces<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Great</strong> A^rac<strong>to</strong>r seems <strong>to</strong> be part of a complex flow linked <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Wall


Preliminary results from cosmicflows-2 in 2013 : Reconstructed matter<br />

density (luminous + dark matter) versus galaxy catalog : Perseus-Pisces<br />

<strong>The</strong>se results are initial conditions for <strong>the</strong> 2 nd and 3 rd generation of CLUES constrained<br />

cosmological simulations.


Future surveys and simulaGons<br />

2015 : cosmicflows-­‐3<br />

Radio : -­‐ conGnue deep HI GBT + PARKES + Archives (~900 GBT -­‐ 200 Parkes)<br />

-­‐ SKA precursors mulGdish : WALLABY ASKAP, WNSHS AperGf Westerbrok<br />

Pho<strong>to</strong>metry : -­‐ near-­‐infrared (SPITZER + WISE) (analysis started)<br />

-­‐ mulGband (Pan-­‐STARRS + SKYMAPPER)<br />

1,800 > 7,000 > 40,000 distances / at 5% / all-­‐sky / 200 Mpc<br />

Peculiar Velocity Data will include Shapley<br />

super-­‐cluster, observe closer <strong>to</strong> ZOA<br />

Do we reach <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> cosmic flow<br />

mo2on <strong>to</strong>wards <strong>the</strong> CMB?<br />

Can we explain it with standard cosmology ?<br />

space<br />

Zone of avoidance<br />

North South


COSFLO team, major results in 2012<br />

• Publication of analysis of cosmicflows-1 catalog (observational data) :<br />

Production of 4D dynamic maps of <strong>the</strong> dark matter in <strong>the</strong> Local Universe up <strong>to</strong> 80 Mpc (z=0.01).<br />

Localisation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Attrac<strong>to</strong>r region and of <strong>the</strong> remaining tidal field of 90km/s wrt CMB dipole.<br />

in collaboration with Hawaii Univ., USA and Special Observa<strong>to</strong>ry, Russia<br />

• Publication of a new code (IceCore) <strong>to</strong> build constrained initial conditions from peculiar velocities.<br />

in collaboration with Hebrew Univ, Israel and Potsdam Univ., Germany<br />

• Preparation of <strong>the</strong> second generation of catalog of peculiar velocities cosmicflows-2, publication of <strong>the</strong><br />

recalibration of <strong>the</strong> Tully-Fisher relation using more than 200 SNIa, Cepheids and 13 galaxy clusters.<br />

in collaboration with Hawaii Univ.<br />

• Publication of a new accurate Hubble constant (up <strong>to</strong> z=1) derived from I band ground pho<strong>to</strong>metry<br />

and space near-infrared measurements : H0 = 75.9 ± 3.8 km.s−1Mpc−1 140<br />

in collaboration with Carnegie Institute (Hubble key <strong>project</strong>) and Univ. Maryland, USA<br />

• Start of <strong>the</strong> science work on Euclid space mission :<br />

Definition of <strong>the</strong> interface between NISP instrument simula<strong>to</strong>r OU-SIM and <strong>the</strong><br />

cosmological numerical simulations CSWG.<br />

Preparing <strong>the</strong> production of <strong>the</strong> first simulated images for NISP.<br />

in collaboration with CPPM Marseille and Durham Univ., UK<br />

SGY [Mpc/h]<br />

160<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

GA<br />

COMA<br />

LSC<br />

30<br />

60<br />

<strong>Great</strong> attrac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160<br />

SGX [Mpc/h]<br />

PP<br />

log(δ+1)<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

-0.5


Thank you<br />

hope you will take home some sense<br />

of your cosmography !

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!