20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

moment in the past) fixed initial stress as well. It is therefore not possible in these cases<br />

to say with certainty whether the licensing asymmetries in question are the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

initiality <strong>of</strong> the syllable or the stressedness <strong>of</strong> the vowel. The relatively small durational<br />

asymmetries characteristic <strong>of</strong> fixed stress systems crosslinguistically would be unlikely to<br />

result in the types <strong>of</strong> dramatic reduction processes discussed in the chapter 2. I argue,<br />

however, that smaller durational asymmetries <strong>of</strong> this sort, together with vowel-to-vowel<br />

coarticulation in languages with a particular morphological structure could result in the<br />

phonologization <strong>of</strong> precisely the types <strong>of</strong> harmony processes so frequently proceeding<br />

(synchronically or diachronically) from initial syllables. I also present the results <strong>of</strong> an<br />

experimental study showing that under certain circumstances even in the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

initial stress a small durational asymmetry between the vowels <strong>of</strong> initial syllables and<br />

those <strong>of</strong> following syllables may be produced by the process <strong>of</strong> initial strengthening well-<br />

documented already for domain-initial consonants. Here too then the typology <strong>of</strong><br />

positional neutralization effects falls out directly from the phonologization approach.<br />

In chapter 5 I present my conclusions together with a discussion <strong>of</strong> the enterprise<br />

<strong>of</strong> phonological typology more generally. Here I compare the phonologization approach<br />

to typological patterning to approaches relying on restrictions on possible systems<br />

encoded in UG. Also discussed are predictions made by the Licensing-by-Cue and Direct<br />

Phonetics approaches to PN in light <strong>of</strong> the empirical findings presented in chapter two<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!