Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Kirchner, Robert. 1998. An effort-based appoach to consonant lenition. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Klatt, Dennis H. 1975. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 3: 129-140. Klatt, Dennis H. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 5: 1208-1221. Kohler, K. J. 1983. Prosodic boundary signals in German. Phonetica 40: 89-134. Konrot, A. K. 1981. Physical correlates of linguistic stress in Turkish. University of Essex Language Centre Occasional Papers 24: 26-53. Kopkalli-Yavuz, Handan. 2000. Paper presented at the International Congress of Turkish Linguistics, Istanbul, August 2000. Krakow, R. A. 1993. Nonsegmental influences on velum movement patterns: syllables, sentences, stress, and speaking rate. Nasals, nasalization, and the velum: Phonetics and Phonology V, ed. by Marie K. Huffman and Rena A. Krakow, 87-116. San Diego, CA: Academic Presss. Krakow, R. A., Bell-Berti, F., and Q. Wang. 1991. Supralaryngeal patterns of declination: labial and velar kinematics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90: Krishnamurti, Bh. and Brett A. Benham. 1998. Konda. The Dravidian Languages, ed. by Sanford B. Steever, 241-269. London, Routledge. 390
Kroeger, Paul. 1992. Vowel harmony systems in three Sabahan languages. Shifting patterns of language use in Borneo: Papers from the second bi-ennial Internationational Conference, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, July, 1992, ed. by Peter W. Martin, 279-296. Kota Kinabalu: Borneo Research Council. Kroeger, Paul. 1993. Kimaragang Phonemics. Phonological descriptions of Sabah languages, ed. by Boutin, Michael E. and Inka Pekkanen, 31-45. Kota Kinabalu: Sabah Museum. Kwenzi Mickala, Jérome. 1980. Esquisse phonologique du punu. Éléments de description du punu, ed. by Francois Nsukka, 7-18. Lyon: Université Lyon. Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell. Lahiri, Aditi and Jorge Hankamer. 1988. The timing of geminate consonants. Journal of Phonetics 16: 327-338. Lavoie, Lisa. 2001. Consonant Strength: Phonological Patterns and Phonetic Manifestations. New York: Garland. Lea, Wayne A. 1977. Acoustic correlates of stress and juncture. Studies in Stress and Accent, ed. by Larry M. Hyman, 83-119. Los Angeles: Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics. Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press. 391
Page 1 and 2:
Positional Neutralization: A Phonol
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Positional Neutralization:
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introd
Page 7 and 8:
3.6.3. Mixed Systems 224 3.6.4. Nas
Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgements The thanks I owe t
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1. Introduction In this stu
Page 13 and 14:
divorced from their phonetic origin
Page 15 and 16:
neutralization such that some combi
Page 17 and 18:
Pure Prominence advocates to assume
Page 19 and 20:
1.1.1.1. Phonetic arbitrariness in
Page 21 and 22:
1.1.2. Phonetically-driven Phonolog
Page 23 and 24:
since it too brings the phonetic fo
Page 25 and 26:
asymmetries are relatively unambigu
Page 27 and 28:
crucial and common to all and adopt
Page 29 and 30:
duration such as unstressed syllabl
Page 31 and 32:
targets for F1). In environments su
Page 33 and 34:
neutralized. Indeed, we would speak
Page 35 and 36:
applying to a single phonological e
Page 37 and 38:
(passim, but especially 1981 and 19
Page 39 and 40:
will treat as the alteration or add
Page 41 and 42:
lengthening, together potentially w
Page 43 and 44:
through four. I conclude that the s
Page 45 and 46:
sort demonstrated in Lindblom (1963
Page 47 and 48:
predictable according to the phonol
Page 49 and 50:
steady across UVR systems, the mapp
Page 51 and 52:
inventories”, the only other opti
Page 53 and 54:
direct result of the phonologizatio
Page 55 and 56:
does not, therefore represent a leg
Page 57 and 58:
question. The point is that the rel
Page 59 and 60:
Another direction might explore the
Page 61 and 62:
monomoraic and bimoraic vowels. Fro
Page 63 and 64:
The preceding sections have shown t
Page 65 and 66:
to perceptual proximity to one anot
Page 67 and 68:
unstressed vowel (Crosswhite 2001:
Page 69 and 70:
Bulgarian has six vowels in stresse
Page 71 and 72:
elsewhere, depending on the informa
Page 73 and 74:
Pettersson and Wood started their i
Page 75 and 76:
discussed below in the context of R
Page 77 and 78:
(known as ‘akanje’, ‘[a]-sayi
Page 79 and 80:
neutralization occurring as a resul
Page 81 and 82:
eduction of pretonic vowels as a si
Page 83 and 84:
2.4. A UG-based approach to UVR typ
Page 85 and 86:
formants to approach and enhance on
Page 87 and 88:
Steriade in particular, in her semi
Page 89 and 90:
emoval of “particularly loud and
Page 91 and 92:
attract stress to sonorous vowels,
Page 93 and 94:
which it is a priori impossible to
Page 95 and 96:
Again, since the low vowel of preto
Page 97 and 98:
If it is correct that, however, tha
Page 99 and 100:
2.5.1. Facts Contemporary Standard
Page 101 and 102:
compared to /a/, he writes that “
Page 103 and 104:
tendency for domain-initial segment
Page 105 and 106:
Each instance of the failure of red
Page 107 and 108:
sentences was a real-word trisyllab
Page 109 and 110:
(10) Russian second pretonic /a/, /
Page 111 and 112:
vowel, and phrase-final position),
Page 113 and 114:
phonetic implementations as a funct
Page 115 and 116:
lengthening of vowels in first pret
Page 117 and 118:
story of articulatory approximation
Page 119 and 120:
pretonic syllables, however, only o
Page 121 and 122:
unstressed /e/ toward [u], finally
Page 123 and 124:
phonetic and phonological perspecti
Page 125 and 126:
should not, and those predictions a
Page 127 and 128:
position as a licenser of contrasts
Page 129 and 130:
insofar as we have seen how positio
Page 131 and 132:
elevant to the present study for th
Page 133 and 134:
effect which is potentially univers
Page 135 and 136:
word-final syllables. Still, the pr
Page 137 and 138:
to be restricted in many languages
Page 139 and 140:
their realizations, determined by b
Page 141 and 142:
(17) Hausa medial short vowels a. [
Page 143 and 144:
Penny (1969: 148-149) gives the vow
Page 145 and 146:
To this we can add facts from neigh
Page 147 and 148:
notion of umlaut or metaphony being
Page 149 and 150:
dialects, Walker notes the differen
Page 151 and 152:
position in the way that, e.g., ret
Page 153 and 154:
is illustrative, but by no means ex
Page 155 and 156:
d. Brazilian Portuguese (Romance) (
Page 157 and 158:
h. English (Germanic)(Hammond 1997)
Page 159 and 160:
hence subphonemic durational featur
Page 161 and 162:
n. Timugon Murut (Austronesian, NE
Page 163 and 164:
(underlying) long vowels 71 , and p
Page 165 and 166:
final lengthening have detected the
Page 167 and 168:
the ends of phrases. They hypothesi
Page 169 and 170:
opposite pattern in both phonetic s
Page 171 and 172:
With respect to the syllable-struct
Page 173 and 174:
strengthened significantly, while v
Page 175 and 176:
strength effects in final position,
Page 177 and 178:
equivalent of unstressed vowel redu
Page 179 and 180:
asymmetry plays a role as well. In
Page 181 and 182:
final strength effects are often fo
Page 183 and 184:
internal unstressed syllables in th
Page 185 and 186:
application (in whatever form) is n
Page 187 and 188:
syllable vowel (that which appeared
Page 189 and 190:
unified phonologization scenario ac
Page 191 and 192:
As for the non-high vowels in preto
Page 193 and 194:
ack” (Kroeger 1992: 280). Kroeger
Page 195 and 196:
stressed [o], preventing it from be
Page 197 and 198:
schwa in normal speech (1993: 38).
Page 199 and 200:
environment, deriving a number of d
Page 201 and 202:
are responsible for the phonologica
Page 203 and 204:
section). A second generalization w
Page 205 and 206:
latter case the same feature is imp
Page 207 and 208:
well-known, for example, that short
Page 209 and 210:
language Dasenech (Sasse 1976), wou
Page 211 and 212:
Another possibility is that devoici
Page 213 and 214:
contexts, however, h-epenthesis is
Page 215 and 216:
supralaryngeal strengthening in thi
Page 217 and 218:
inherently problematic from a produ
Page 219 and 220:
lengthening in Dutch by Cambier-Lan
Page 221 and 222:
contradictions this entails describ
Page 223 and 224:
preceding consonants, etc.). It see
Page 225 and 226:
Gordon and Ladefoged mention alloph
Page 227 and 228:
In other words, the creak appears o
Page 229 and 230:
phrase-final devoicing seems to be
Page 231 and 232:
targeted, and hence realized as glo
Page 233 and 234:
their common properties, restoring
Page 235 and 236:
when following voiced consonants or
Page 237 and 238:
(Brame 1972), and D’irayta (Haywa
Page 239 and 240:
monolithic weakening environment. H
Page 241 and 242:
Another study, in fact, that of Vas
Page 243 and 244:
velic opening. There has been much
Page 245 and 246:
The same pattern is found in anothe
Page 247 and 248:
lengthening-plus-intrinsic-nasaliza
Page 249 and 250:
commonly enough resolved with glott
Page 251 and 252:
nasal consonant, and the vowel rema
Page 253 and 254:
. Ongota (affiliation uncertain - C
Page 255 and 256:
combination of phonetic strengtheni
Page 257 and 258:
mentioned. Often deletion is preced
Page 259 and 260:
f. Kandahari Pashto (Elfenbein 1997
Page 261 and 262:
for some speakers of Brazilian Port
Page 263 and 264:
discussion of devoicing, above, tha
Page 265 and 266:
(36) Russian phrase-final [blot] 's
Page 267 and 268:
drastically decreased, as an alread
Page 269 and 270:
lengthening the latter parts of the
Page 271 and 272:
Avoidance of length contrasts word-
Page 273 and 274:
While the non-finality of stress ap
Page 275 and 276:
points out the case of Luganda (Hym
Page 277 and 278:
syllables are apparently required t
Page 279 and 280:
with non-modal phonation or devoici
Page 281 and 282:
3.7.2. Final short vowel avoidance
Page 283 and 284:
generally between 95 and 125 in the
Page 285 and 286:
e considered from a crosslinguistic
Page 287 and 288:
Chapter 4. Initial Syllables Domain
Page 289 and 290:
know of the relevant phonetic facts
Page 291 and 292:
lengthening or lowering the sonorit
Page 293 and 294:
asymmetries it carries, is what Smi
Page 295 and 296:
phonological licensing in question
Page 297 and 298:
eason to favor the one strategy ove
Page 299 and 300:
Before turning to the attested case
Page 301 and 302:
initial consonant serves to enhance
Page 303 and 304:
existence of the former, and I will
Page 305 and 306:
since the majority of phonological
Page 307 and 308:
eduction to schwa in Russian and in
Page 309 and 310:
assumption that in providing a comp
Page 311 and 312:
initial and non-initial vowels from
Page 313 and 314:
durational asymmetry was absent alt
Page 315 and 316:
low mid vowels to become unpredicta
Page 317 and 318:
of the typology of initial-syllable
Page 319 and 320:
there could in principle be a phone
Page 321 and 322:
ackness of non-initial vowels is ge
Page 323 and 324:
fricatives, which in retrospect may
Page 325 and 326:
(44) Mean vowel durations for Engli
Page 327 and 328:
initial strengthening in languages
Page 329 and 330:
Word-initial: U[Phr[istanbuldaki W[
Page 331 and 332:
syllables than the other speakers.
Page 333 and 334:
Concerning the language-specific na
Page 335 and 336:
4.5.3. Consequences of domain-initi
Page 337 and 338:
All these cases, while not in fact
Page 339 and 340:
in chapter 2, however, among the un
Page 341 and 342:
advice for teachers of non-standard
Page 343 and 344:
Inkelas et al. (2001), building on
Page 345 and 346:
demonstrated above, however, initia
Page 347 and 348:
Assuming now that Vowels 1 and 2 in
Page 349 and 350: This account derives palatal vowel
Page 351 and 352: vowels in Luganda and Runyambo. Hub
Page 353 and 354: the UVR systems of Yakan, Timugon M
Page 355 and 356: 4.6. Summary In this chapter I have
Page 357 and 358: why we find such systems in Turkic
Page 359 and 360: Chapter 5. Conclusions 5.1. Phonolo
Page 361 and 362: perfectly understandable in the pho
Page 363 and 364: as the durational asymmetries in qu
Page 365 and 366: model of phonetics-phonology incorp
Page 367 and 368: of effort necessary to reach a low
Page 369 and 370: (specified by Minimum Distance cons
Page 371 and 372: duration for /a/~/o/ in this positi
Page 373 and 374: unstressed syllables in a given lan
Page 375 and 376: patterns such as those treated in t
Page 377 and 378: References Abondolo, Daniel. 1998a.
Page 379 and 380: Balasubramanian, T. 1981. Duration
Page 381 and 382: Blevins, Juliette. 1993. A tonal an
Page 383 and 384: Browman, Catherine P. and Louis Gol
Page 385 and 386: Chen, Matthew. 1973. Nasals and nas
Page 387 and 388: Dauer, Rebecca M. 1987. Phonetic an
Page 389 and 390: Farnetani, Edda and Shiro Kori. 199
Page 391 and 392: Garrett, Andrew and Juliette Blevin
Page 393 and 394: Hayes, Bruce. 1997. Phonetically-dr
Page 395 and 396: Hyde, Villiana. 1971. An introducti
Page 397 and 398: Janiak, BronisΩawa. 1995. Polsko-U
Page 399: Keating, Patricia, Richard Wright a
Page 403 and 404: Liphola, Marcelino M. 2001. Aspects
Page 405 and 406: Miller, Carolyn. 1993 Kadazan/Dusun
Page 407 and 408: Nord, Lennart. 1987. Acoustic studi
Page 409 and 410: Penny, Ralph. 1986. Sandhi phenomen
Page 411 and 412: Rietveld, A. C. M. and U. H. Frauen
Page 413 and 414: Schuh, Russell G. and Lawan D. Yalw
Page 415 and 416: Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional
Page 417 and 418: Tuttle, Siri. 2000. Duration, inton
Page 419 and 420: Wolgemuth, Carl. 1969. Isthmus Vera
show all

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?