20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

duration for /a/~/o/ in this position, but it will certainly be longer than the 90 ms given by<br />

Matusevich (1976) for this vowel in Standard Russian. We might well wonder at this<br />

point just how long a vowel this would need to be to realize the contrast between /a/ and<br />

/o/ robustly. It is by no means obvious that even as mean duration <strong>of</strong> 90 ms is terribly<br />

impoverished in this respect. Additionally, given that a clear [a] is realized here<br />

consistently, there can be no question <strong>of</strong> duration pressures causing undershoot <strong>of</strong> any<br />

kind, so that it not clear why any minimum distance constraints would be violated in the<br />

first place 137 . The problem is that whatever phonetic circumstances gave rise to this<br />

particular neutralization were relevant and operational only hundreds <strong>of</strong> years ago, when<br />

the neutralization was phonologized 138 . Synchronically, the neutralization simply takes<br />

place when the relevant segments occur in the specified structural positions, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

the phonetic characteristics <strong>of</strong> vowels pronounced there in synchrony.<br />

Consider also in this connection the case <strong>of</strong> Seediq. In Chapter Two I presented<br />

an analysis <strong>of</strong> Seediq UVR, where in posttonic syllable unstressed /e/, /o/, /u/ merge as<br />

/u/. I demonstrated that the source <strong>of</strong> this pattern is that fact that Seediq stressed /e/<br />

137<br />

It might be possible in the Russian case to derive this result by assuming that the mean realization values<br />

for the duration <strong>of</strong> unstressed /a/ were calculated over all unstressed syllables, rather than just over first<br />

pretonics. Given that first pretonic and non-first pretonic syllables must have separate durational targets<br />

specified though (the former being substantially longer than the latter), it is not clear why this would be so.<br />

138<br />

Recall that it is still not clear whether the neutralization <strong>of</strong> /a/ and /o/ in unstressed syllables was actually<br />

a merger historically, or if the two (derived originally form long and short /a/ respectively) rather simply<br />

failed to split everywhere but the stressed syllable. Either way the conditions in question are not relevant to<br />

the synchronic implementation <strong>of</strong> UVR in Russian.<br />

361

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!