20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(45) [pHa»pHatja] chamomile<br />

Here the strong aspiration <strong>of</strong> the initial labial stop is clear. It is in fact substantially<br />

stronger than that found in the onset <strong>of</strong> the stressed second syllable 121 . The longer<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the second vowel is due to syllable structure, closed syllables hosting longer<br />

vowels than open syllables in Turkish (Kopkallı-Yavuz 2001, Barnes 2001b. I suspect<br />

that it is this initial-consonant strengthening, combined with the vocalic effect presented<br />

below, with is being heard and interpreted as an initial “dynamic stress” in Modern<br />

Turkish by some scholars, as detailed above. The fact that it continues to occur in words<br />

like [pHa»pHatja], where the adjacent penult is unequivocally stressed (or receives what<br />

Johanson would call the pitch accent and possibly “dynamic stress” as well 122 ), makes it<br />

unlikely that an accent or secondary stress is somehow involved. Given the generality <strong>of</strong><br />

121<br />

In Turkish as in English, both word-initial and stressed-syllable-initial voiceless stops receive strong<br />

aspiration.<br />

122<br />

See Konrot (1981) for discussion <strong>of</strong> the possibility that while Turkish final stress is cued solely by F0,<br />

the non-final stress <strong>of</strong> borrowings and toponyms may actually be cued by both pitch and amplitude (though<br />

not duration).<br />

316

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!