20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fricatives, which in retrospect may have been an error, since these too are known to<br />

impact negatively the durations <strong>of</strong> following vowels. The number <strong>of</strong> such tokens,<br />

however, was relatively small, and evenly distributed between initial-syllable and second<br />

syllable tokens. All target vowels occurred in open syllables, again with an eye to<br />

reducing non-position-dependent durational variation. (42) shows a pair <strong>of</strong> tokens<br />

illustrating the two types <strong>of</strong> stimuli.<br />

(42) Syllable 1 vs. Syllable 2<br />

màcerabílity anàphrodísiac<br />

Each token was situated in three different frame sentences selected to place the target<br />

word in initial position in a variety <strong>of</strong> prosodic domains à la Fougeron and Keating 1996.<br />

The relevant domains were Utterance, Phonological Phrase, and Phonological Word. This<br />

is shown in (43).<br />

(43) Prosodic Environments<br />

a. Utterance-initial: U[Phr[X is an interesting topic.<br />

b. Phonological Phrase-initial: U[Phr[I think]Phr[X is an interesting topic.<br />

c. Word-initial: U[Phr[Y X compound] is an interesting topic.<br />

e.g. fish macerability, frog anaphrodisiacs, toe lacerability, plan irrationality<br />

Participants were two native speakers <strong>of</strong> North American English raised in the<br />

northeastern United States, one male and one female. Speakers read the test sentences<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!