20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(Brame 1972), and D’irayta (Hayward 1998) exhibit this pattern 103 . Gilbertese represents<br />

a compromise variant, in which all final long high vowels shorten, but only short high<br />

vowels after nasals are deleted (Blevins 1997). The remaining logical possibility,<br />

glottalization <strong>of</strong> both long and short vowels (with retention <strong>of</strong> the contrast) is attested, but<br />

in only one instance I have found so far (Isthmus Veracruz Zapotec, Wolgemuth 1969).<br />

Again, it is possible that such a system would be inherently unstable, if the glottal<br />

adduction gesture were to shorten the long vowels enough that the durational difference<br />

became less robust 104 .<br />

In the above sections I have detailed aspects <strong>of</strong> the phonetics <strong>of</strong> phrase-final<br />

position which can be characterized as “weakening” or “prominence-reducing” in nature,<br />

at least in their unphonologized state. I have presented a typology and developmental<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the phonological patterns which arise from these phonetic trends. I have also<br />

argued that the presence <strong>of</strong> these phonetic weakening patterns is in no way<br />

implementationally antagonistic to the presence in the same system <strong>of</strong> phonetic patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> phrase-final lengthening and gestural enhancement along some dimensions. The<br />

103<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> full deletion, <strong>of</strong> course, and absent comparanda or historical records, such a system would<br />

be indistinguishable from a system in which the quantity distinction is neutralized, but reflexes <strong>of</strong> both<br />

vowels are retained, described below.<br />

104<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> the combinations attested above does seem to be that those patterns which would best<br />

preserve the quantity contrast are the ones which are best attested. This does not imply teleology, however,<br />

or “intelligent design” as wags have put it. These systems are the best attested simply because the other<br />

combinations however <strong>of</strong>ten they may emerge, are simply less likely to remain observable over the long<br />

term, resulting in their comparative rarity. The logic here is evolutionary, in the spirit <strong>of</strong> Blevins (in prep),<br />

Blevins and Garrett (1998), and Ohala (passim).<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!