20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a wider specification allows the influence <strong>of</strong> contextual factors to be felt more strongly,<br />

resulting in gradient or contingent instantiations <strong>of</strong> certain features or processes. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> devoicing and glottalization, it has been necessary to distinguish even complete<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> a specified target or gesture from the presence <strong>of</strong> such a target, however variable<br />

in implementation. In the case <strong>of</strong> phonetic underspecification (whether we mean<br />

complete lack <strong>of</strong> a specified target, as with passive devoicing, or only having a broad<br />

target window, like gradient), the realization <strong>of</strong> the feature or features in question will be<br />

to some extent automatically interpolated, either as a function <strong>of</strong> the realization <strong>of</strong> other<br />

features (e.g. duration), or as transitions between two specified points along a continuum<br />

<strong>of</strong> potential targets for the same feature (i.e. pitch). Importantly though, both are tokens<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same phonetic feature, broadly conceived. A partially or completely underspecified<br />

realization results in a broad continuum <strong>of</strong> potential degrees <strong>of</strong> instantiation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

particular feature, while a narrowly specified feature singles out a small portion <strong>of</strong> that<br />

continuum <strong>of</strong> possible realizations as optimal. In the case <strong>of</strong> the phonologizations above,<br />

however, the specified and underspecified variants are instances <strong>of</strong> two completely<br />

distinct types from an articulatory point <strong>of</strong> view (in that the gestures needed to make<br />

them are largely mutually incompatible). If our phonetic component contains<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> acoustic features or properties, <strong>of</strong> course, then the problem is more<br />

tractable; both types <strong>of</strong> glottalization can be represented in acoustic terms according to<br />

222

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!