20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

well-known, for example, that shorter vowels are more likely to devoice than longer<br />

vowels (presumably because the duration and robustness <strong>of</strong> the necessary vocal-fold<br />

adduction gesture is sufficient to prevent longer vowels being overlapped by neighboring<br />

voiceless segments or falling victim to complete devoicing as a result <strong>of</strong> decreased<br />

subglottal pressure). Word-final vowels, though perhaps produced without the phrase-<br />

final drop in subglottal pressure, are also produced without phrase-final lengthening.<br />

Without this lengthening and a following phrase boundary, in many languages word-final<br />

vowels can actually be among the shortest possible in the system, making them<br />

susceptible to elision in hiatus contexts or interconsonantal devoicing <strong>of</strong> the same sort<br />

discussed by Gordon for word-internal vowels. In Major’s study <strong>of</strong> Brazilian Portuguese<br />

timing patterns (1981), di- and trisyllabic nonsense forms <strong>of</strong> the segmental shape [lala] or<br />

[lalala] situated in phrase medial contexts were realized (for a single speaker) with the<br />

following durational patterns:<br />

(27) Mean vowel durations in Brazilian Portuguese di- and trisyllables (Major 1981)<br />

token vowel durations in ms<br />

v1 v2 v3<br />

a. /lalá/ 151 222<br />

/lála/ 217 114<br />

b. /lalála/ 138 202 108<br />

/lálala/ 208 122 99<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!