20.07.2013 Views

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

Positional Neutralization - Linguistics - University of California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

h. English (Germanic)(Hammond 1997)<br />

Inventory: /i, , e, , æ, , , , o, , u/<br />

Reduction: Unstressed word-internal preconsonantal syllables contain only [] 64<br />

Unstressed word-internal prevocalic syllables contain [i, u, o, e]<br />

Final strength effects: Word-final open syllables show [i, u, o, ]<br />

i. Yakan (Austronesian: Philippines, SW Mindanao, Basilan Island) (Behrens<br />

1975, Flemming 1993)<br />

Inventory: /i, e, a, o, u/<br />

Reduction: Primary stress is penultimate, with secondaries on alternating syllables<br />

preceding. In unstressed syllables /a/ -> [e].<br />

Resistance: In word-final open and closed syllables reduction does not take place (nor<br />

does it in pretonic syllables when the following syllable is also [a]).<br />

j. Maltese (Semitic)(Puech 1978)<br />

Harmony: In Standard Maltese and closely related dialects, there is a left-to-right<br />

rounding harmony which targets all short non-low vowels triggered by [o]. In<br />

Siggieha and Gozitan dialect, harmony affects vowels <strong>of</strong> all heights, affecting<br />

specifications for [back].<br />

Resistance: While in some dialects suffix vowels only harmonize if they are in a final<br />

closed syllable (with no harmony taking place if additional syllables intervening<br />

between the stem and the word-final syllable, even if intervening syllables contain<br />

otherwise-eligible vowels), in no dialect do vowels in final open syllables ever<br />

harmonize. 65 ,<br />

64<br />

Hammond’s analysis admits only one reduced vowel.<br />

65<br />

A possible explanation for this not involving final lengthening directly is that while synchronically all<br />

surface final vowels are short (phonologically), underlyingly they are all long. Maltese has undergone a<br />

common sound change (to be discussed below in 3.6 and 3.7), whereby long final vowels shorten and short<br />

final vowels are deleted. The original length <strong>of</strong> the remaining final vowels could have prevented their<br />

harmonization. Flemming (1993: 21) does not discuss harmony, but notes that final syllables closed and<br />

open are never subject to unstressed vowel deletion in Maltese, and attributes this resistance to final<br />

lengthening. This may ultimately be so, though I see two reasons for skepticism. First is the tendency for<br />

final closed syllables (indeed stronger than for internal closed syllables in some dialects), but not final open<br />

syllables, to undergo harmony, suggesting if anything decreased duration in final closed syllables. Another<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!