You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section 105 (B) and (C): Catering for tastes and interests/broadening choice<br />
In order to allow <strong>Rother</strong> <strong>FM</strong> to take advantage of the widest range of presentation talent<br />
available within the group, a few of our locally-made automated programmes may be voiced<br />
by presenters based at other Lincs <strong>FM</strong> Group stations. However, the programmes would be<br />
produced at <strong>Rother</strong> <strong>FM</strong>, for <strong>Rother</strong> <strong>FM</strong>, using local material (what’s ons, chat about local<br />
issues and so on) provided by <strong>Rother</strong> <strong>FM</strong> and indistinguishable in any way from programmes<br />
fronted by presenters who are physically based at <strong>Rother</strong> <strong>FM</strong>’s studios.<br />
We note that the term used in this question is “locally-made”, and of course such programmes<br />
fall into that category. The draft format wording asks for something slightly different: the<br />
number of hours to be “locally produced and presented”. In writing our draft format we have<br />
assumed that this phrase is designed to mean the same thing as “locally-made” and have<br />
answered accordingly. We trust that using presenters at other stations in the Group to voice<br />
a small number of locally-produced automated shows does not exclude them from the<br />
category of “locally produced and presented.”<br />
34