19.07.2013 Views

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Attachment 3<br />

RISK ASSESSMENT TOOLS, DETAILS, AND EXAMPLES<br />

A3.1. Introduction. There are many ways to assess risk, but the easiest and most effective for routine risk<br />

management applications is the risk assessment matrix introduced in Section D. The easiest way to<br />

understand the application of the matrix is to apply it. Follow the reasoning of the matrix user in the<br />

example below as he applies the matrix to the assessment of the hazards associated with the movement of a<br />

heavy machine from point A to point B.<br />

A3.1.1. Example. The example below demonstrates the application of the matrix to a hazard associated<br />

with moving a heavy piece of machinery.<br />

A3.1.1.1. Hazard to be assessed: The hazard of the machine falling over and injuring personnel.<br />

A3.1.1.2. Probability assessment: The following paragraphs illustrate the thinking process that might be<br />

followed in developing the probability segment of the risk assessment:<br />

A3.1.1.2.1. Use previous experience and the database, if available. “We moved a similar machine once<br />

before and although it did not fall over, there were some close calls. This machine is not as easy to secure<br />

as that machine and has a higher center of gravity and poses an even greater chance of falling. The base<br />

safety office indicates that there was a mishap about 18 months ago that involved a similar operation. An<br />

individual received a broken leg in that case.”<br />

A3.1.1.2.2. Use the output of the hazard analysis process. “Our hazard analysis shows that there are<br />

several steps in the machine movement process where the machine is vulnerable to falling. Furthermore,<br />

there are several different types of failures that could cause the machine to fall. Both these factors increase<br />

the probability of falling.”<br />

A3.1.1.2.3. Consider expert opinion. “My experienced NCOs feel that there is a real danger of the<br />

machine falling”<br />

A3.1.1.2.4. Consider your own intuition and judgment. “My gut feeling is that there is a real possibility<br />

we could lose control of this machine and topple it. The fact that we rarely move machines quite like this<br />

one increases the probability of trouble.”<br />

A3.1.1.2.5. Refer to the matrix terms. “Hmmm, the decision seems to be between likely and occasional.<br />

I understand likely to mean that the machine is likely to fall, meaning a pretty high probability. Certainly<br />

there is a real chance it may fall, but if we are careful, there should be no problem. I am going to select<br />

Occasional as the best option from the matrix.”<br />

A3.1.1.3. Severity assessment. The following illustrates the thinking process that might occur in selecting<br />

the severity portion of the risk assessment matrix for the machine falling hazard:<br />

A3.1.1.3.1. Identify likely outcomes. “If the machine falls, it will crush whatever it lands on. Such an<br />

injury will almost certainly be severe. Because of the height of the machine, it can easily fall on a person’s<br />

head and body with almost certain fatal results. There are also a variety of different crushing injuries,<br />

especially of the feet, even if the machine falls only a short distance.<br />

A3.1.1.3.2. Identify the most likely outcomes. “Because of the weight of the machine, a severe injury is<br />

almost certain. Because people are fairly agile and the fact that the falling machine gives a little warning<br />

that it is falling, death is not likely.”<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!