BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...
BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...
BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A2.B.9. <strong>THE</strong> MISSION MISHAP ANALYSIS<br />
A2.B.9.1. FORMAL NAME. The mission mishap analysis<br />
A2.B.9.2. ALTERNATIVE NAMES. The mission accident analysis<br />
A2.B.9.3. PURPOSE. Most organizations have accumulated extensive, detailed mishap databases that are<br />
gold mines of risk data. The purpose of the mission mishap analysis is to assure that this data is being<br />
effectively applied to the prevention of future mishaps.<br />
A2.B.9.4. APPLICATION. Every organization should complete a mission mishap analysis annually. The<br />
objective is to update the understanding of current mishap trends and causal factors. Changes that occur in<br />
less than a year are not likely to be statistically significant. Waiting more than a year may miss important<br />
changes in trends. The analysis should be completed for each organizational component that is likely to<br />
have unique mishap factors.<br />
A2.B.9.5. METHOD. The art and science of mishap analysis can be approached in many ways.<br />
Essentially it relies on Pareto’s law (the fact that in a wide variety of activities, 80% of the problems are<br />
found in 20% of the exposure). For example, 80% of the unsafe acts in a group of employees may be<br />
committed by only 20% of the employees. The process of mission mishap analysis is finding the 20% of<br />
personnel, facilities, activities, etc. that are causing the bulk of the risk in the organization. If the mishap<br />
database is computerized, the computer can do much of the initial sorting of the data. A human analyst<br />
will have to do the final interpretation of the data. If the work must be done manually, the process involves<br />
the determination of likely risk factors and then the examination of the data to determine if the factors in<br />
fact exist. Typical factors to examine include the following:<br />
A2.B.9.5.1. Activity at the time of the mishap.<br />
A2.B.9.5.2. Distribution of mishaps among personnel.<br />
A2.B.9.5.3. Mishap locations.<br />
A2.B.9.5.4. Distribution of mishaps by sub-unit.<br />
A2.B.9.5.5. Patterns of unsafe acts or conditions.<br />
A2.B.9.6. RESOURCES. The mission mishap analysis relies on a relatively complete and accurate mishap<br />
database. The base safety office will normally have the needed data. That office can also provide<br />
assistance in the analysis process. Safety personnel may have already completed analyses of similar<br />
activities or they may be able to suggest the most productive areas for initial analysis.<br />
A2.B.9.7. COMMENTS. The data in mishap databases has been acquired the hard way - through the<br />
painful and costly mistakes of hundreds of individuals. It is tragic when organizations fail to take full<br />
advantage of this information and therefore doom themselves to experience the same failures over and over<br />
again.<br />
A2.B.9.8. EXAMPLES. Examples of mishap analyses and mishap data available can be obtained from<br />
servicing safety offices.<br />
70