BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A7.3.3. The emergency procedures index. This index measures the readiness of the shop to respond to various emergencies such as fires, injuries, and hazmat releases. It is made up of a compilation of indicators as shown at Figure A7.3. A high score is desirable. Figure A7.3. Example Emergency Procedures Measurement. 1. Scores on emergency procedure quizzes 2. Percentage of emergency equipment on hand and fully operational 3. Scores on emergency response drills indicating speed, correct procedures, and other effectiveness indicators. A7.3.4. The quality assurance score. This score measures a defined set of maintenance indicators tailored to the particular type of aircraft serviced. Quality Assurance (QA) personnel record deviations in these target areas as a percentage of total observations made. The specific types of deviations are noted. The score is the percentage of positive observations with a high score being desirable. Secondary scores could be developed for each type of deviation if desired. A7.3.5. The overall index. Any combination of the indicators previously mentioned, along with others as desired, can be rolled up into an overall index for the maintenance facility as illustrated at Figure A7.4. Figure A7.4. Example Overall Measurement. Tool control safety index: 93.3 Protective clothing and equipment safety index: 78.0 Emergency procedures index: 88.4 Quality Assurance Score: 97.9 TOTAL: 357.6 OR AVERAGE: 89.4 This index is the overall safety index for the maintenance facility. The goal is to push toward 100% or a maximum score of 400. This index would be used in our accountability procedures to measure performance and establish the basis for rewards or corrective action. A7.4. Once the data has been collected and analyzed, the results need to be provided to the unit. With this information the unit will be able to concentrate their efforts on those areas where improvement would produce the greatest gain. A7.5. Summary. It is not difficult to set up useful and effective measures of operational risk, particularly once the key risks have been identified during a risk assessment. Additionally, the workload associated with such indicators can be minimized by using data already collected and by collecting the data as an integrated routine aspect of operational processes. 114
Page 1 and 2:
BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET
Page 3 and 4:
Figure 14. Levels of Command Involv
Page 5 and 6:
levels while preserving assets and
Page 7 and 8:
Section B—The ORM Process 5. Intr
Page 9 and 10:
8.2. Identified Risk is risk that h
Page 11 and 12:
10.3.12. There are no “safety pro
Page 13 and 14:
12.3.3.2. Maintenance: Availability
Page 15 and 16:
15. Section C—Step 1—Identify H
Page 17 and 18:
the sequence indicated, however it
Page 19 and 20:
24.1.1. CATASTROPHIC—Complete mis
Page 21 and 22:
labeled with its significance (high
Page 23 and 24:
32.3. The feasible alternatives mus
Page 25 and 26:
36.3. When notified of a situation
Page 27 and 28:
Section G—Step 5—Implement Risk
Page 29 and 30:
It is usually a good idea to signal
Page 31 and 32:
negative consequences occur, proper
Page 33 and 34:
Section I—Conclusion 54. Operatio
Page 35 and 36:
HAZOP—Hazard operability Hrs—Ho
Page 37 and 38:
Risk—An expression of consequence
Page 39 and 40:
A2.A.3. THE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS AND
Page 41 and 42:
A2.A.3.8.2. Any one event of the ab
Page 43 and 44:
ase of experience and expertise. Of
Page 45 and 46:
the involvement of operators and th
Page 47 and 48:
Figure A2.8. Example Deployment Sce
Page 49 and 50:
4 levels is usually very limited. T
Page 51 and 52:
A2.A.7.6. RESOURCES. A key resource
Page 53 and 54:
Figure A2.16. Sample Change Analysi
Page 55 and 56:
Figure A2.18. Example of Change Ana
Page 57 and 58:
Figure A2.19. Example of Cause and
Page 59 and 60:
A2.B.3. THE HAZARD AND OPERABILITY
Page 61 and 62:
A2.B.4. THE MAPPING TOOL A2.B.4.1.
Page 63 and 64: A2.B.5. THE INTERFACE ANALYSIS A2.B
Page 65 and 66: A2.B.6. THE MISSION PROTECTION TOOL
Page 67 and 68: A2.B.7. THE SAFETY QUIZ A2.B.7.1. F
Page 69 and 70: A2.B.8. THE NEXT MISHAP ASSESSMENT
Page 71 and 72: A2.B.10. THE INTERVIEW TOOL A2.B.10
Page 73 and 74: A2.B.11. THE INSPECTION TOOL A2.B.1
Page 75 and 76: A2.B.12. THE MISHAP/INCIDENT INVEST
Page 77 and 78: Figure A2.30 Sample Job Hazard Anal
Page 79 and 80: training and observation time. Succ
Page 81 and 82: A2.B.15.6. RESOURCES. Effective use
Page 83 and 84: A2.B.16. THE OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT
Page 85 and 86: SECTION A2.C. THE ADVANCED HAZARD I
Page 87 and 88: Figure A2.37. Types of Energy. Elec
Page 89 and 90: A2.C.5. THE FAULT TREE ANALYSIS A2.
Page 91 and 92: A2.C.6. THE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT
Page 93 and 94: A2.C.7. THE MULTILINEAR EVENTS SEQU
Page 95 and 96: A2.C.8. THE MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT AN
Page 97 and 98: Attachment 3 RISK ASSESSMENT TOOLS,
Page 99 and 100: A3.2.3. Lack of a range of rankings
Page 101 and 102: Attachment 4 RISK CONTROL OPTION AN
Page 103 and 104: SECTION A4.B. THE RISK CONTROL OPTI
Page 105 and 106: Figure A4.2. Example Risk Control O
Page 107 and 108: elatively small investments in risk
Page 109 and 110: Figure A5.2. Example Maximizing Ban
Page 111 and 112: Attachment 6 RISK CONTROL IMPLEMENT
Page 113: Attachment 7 SUPERVISE AND REVIEW D
show all

BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE PAMPHLET 91-215 SECRETARY ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?