JP 3-50 National Search and Rescue Manual Vol I - US Navy
JP 3-50 National Search and Rescue Manual Vol I - US Navy JP 3-50 National Search and Rescue Manual Vol I - US Navy
TABLE 5-12. Sweep Widths For Side-Looking Airborne Radar Sweep Width (NM) Douglas Douglas Sea State Sea State Target Type O to 1 2 to 3 Fiberglass or wooden boats, 20 feet or less, without radar reflector or engine/ metal equipment 16
Sweep widths should be approximated, using the operator's best estimate of effective detection ranges for other target types and field of view/scan width limits. Operators should be told the effective detection range is the range at which they believe the target will certainly be detected under prevailing conditions. Sweep width should not exceed the effective azimuthal coverage of the FLIR system in use, regardless of target size. Figure 5-17 illustrates a means of estimating sweep width. G. Multisensor Sweep Widths 1. Environmental parameters limit all types of search methods. Multisensor searching, both sensor and combinations of sensor and visual, can be used to mitigate environmental limitations. Table 5-14 outlines various ways in which radar, infrared, and visual searches can be combined to complement each other and possibly overcome some environmental conditions. 2. Sweep width tables for various combinations of search sensors, based on the type of conditions, type of target, and sensors used, are presented in Vol. II, Chapter 4. 3. Combined sensor searches should be planned so that sensor capabilities complement each other. Search patterns and track spacing should be selected on the basis of the effectiveness of the different SRU sensors available. The most effective sensor should be favored and controllable parameters, such as speed and altitude, should be selected to maximize the performance of the most capable sensor. 4. Multisensor searches are normally assigned only if they provide the maximum sweep width possible with the available personnel. Scanners should not be manning sensors ineffective for the search conditions if they might be used as visual scanners. 5. Visual searching may supplement sensor coverage by filling in blind zones created by antenna configuration and physical or operational limitations of the electronic equipment. 536 Coverage Factor (C) Coverage Factor (C) is a measure of search effectiveness or quality. It is used as an entering argument when calculating POD. In SAR action 5-26
- Page 111 and 112: 451 Uncertainty Phase An Emergency
- Page 113 and 114: 471 PRECOM A. PRECOM search contact
- Page 115 and 116: the objective during their normal o
- Page 117 and 118: effective search plan. The plan may
- Page 119 and 120: D. Other SAR planning models, such
- Page 121 and 122: 1. The aircraft glide area shown in
- Page 123 and 124: Figure 5-3. Vector Plots of Surface
- Page 125 and 126: TABLE 5-1. Parachute Drift Distance
- Page 127 and 128: the search object has, the greater
- Page 129 and 130: B. Sea Current (SC) is the residual
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 5-6A. Wind Current - North L
- Page 133 and 134: large lake can vary with season, we
- Page 135 and 136: 5. Other on scene observations can
- Page 137 and 138: 520 SEARCH AREA Figure 5-8. Minimax
- Page 139 and 140: Figure 5-9. Drift Error by Minimax
- Page 141 and 142: DRe to determine SRU error (Y = Fix
- Page 143 and 144: Figure 5-11. Search Areas - Moving
- Page 145 and 146: E. When only a datum area exists, s
- Page 147 and 148: SRUs are dispatched next. Supplemen
- Page 149 and 150: B. POD can be increased by decreasi
- Page 151 and 152: C. Visual sweep widths are determin
- Page 153 and 154: TABLE 5-6. Visual Sweep Width Estim
- Page 155 and 156: 9. Fatigue. Degradation of detectio
- Page 157 and 158: Table 5-8. Height of Eye vs. Horizo
- Page 159 and 160: 6. Sweep widths for Side-Looking Ai
- Page 161: TABLE 5-11a. Sweep Widths for Forwa
- Page 165 and 166: TABLE 5-14. Environmental Limitatio
- Page 167 and 168: Figure 5-19. Maritime Probability o
- Page 169 and 170: again, unless it is determined furt
- Page 171 and 172: c. This track spacing may exceed th
- Page 173 and 174: a. E-7 corners 23 15N 74 35W to 23
- Page 175 and 176: E. Orienting Search Areas Search pa
- Page 177 and 178: Figure 5-21. Typical Assignments fo
- Page 179 and 180: The major pattern characteristic is
- Page 181 and 182: Figure 5-26. Figure 5-27. 3. Parall
- Page 183 and 184: Figure 5-31. Figure 5-32. D. Creepi
- Page 185 and 186: area, they must fly their individua
- Page 187 and 188: for large objects in well-defined s
- Page 189 and 190: I. Homing Patterns (H) are used to
- Page 191 and 192: completed, the initial area, not th
- Page 193 and 194: Pattern Name SRU required Remarks T
- Page 195 and 196: 560 PLANNING OF ON SCENE COORDINATI
- Page 197 and 198: NOTAM for non-SAR aircraft to remai
- Page 199 and 200: described as previously discussed,
- Page 201 and 202: procedures for aircraft SRUs should
- Page 203 and 204: 1. Where sea current, tidal current
- Page 205 and 206: eturn to base. E. Continuous attent
- Page 207 and 208: to minimize clutter. While this is
- Page 209 and 210: 642 Aircraft Search A. Overwater Se
- Page 211 and 212: one leg to the next without the nee
Sweep widths should be approximated, using the operator's best<br />
estimate of effective detection ranges for other target types <strong>and</strong> field<br />
of view/scan width limits. Operators should be told the effective<br />
detection range is the range at which they believe the target will<br />
certainly be detected under prevailing conditions. Sweep width should<br />
not exceed the effective azimuthal coverage of the FLIR system in use,<br />
regardless of target size. Figure 5-17 illustrates a means of<br />
estimating sweep width.<br />
G. Multisensor Sweep Widths<br />
1. Environmental parameters limit all types of search methods.<br />
Multisensor searching, both sensor <strong>and</strong> combinations of sensor<br />
<strong>and</strong> visual, can be used to mitigate environmental limitations.<br />
Table 5-14 outlines various ways in which radar, infrared, <strong>and</strong><br />
visual searches can be combined to complement each other <strong>and</strong><br />
possibly overcome some environmental conditions.<br />
2. Sweep width tables for various combinations of search sensors,<br />
based on the type of conditions, type of target, <strong>and</strong> sensors<br />
used, are presented in <strong>Vol</strong>. II, Chapter 4.<br />
3. Combined sensor searches should be planned so that sensor<br />
capabilities complement each other. <strong>Search</strong> patterns <strong>and</strong> track<br />
spacing should be selected on the basis of the effectiveness<br />
of the different SRU sensors available. The most effective<br />
sensor should be favored <strong>and</strong> controllable parameters, such as<br />
speed <strong>and</strong> altitude, should be selected to maximize the<br />
performance of the most capable sensor.<br />
4. Multisensor searches are normally assigned only if they<br />
provide the maximum sweep width possible with the available<br />
personnel. Scanners should not be manning sensors ineffective<br />
for the search conditions if they might be used as visual<br />
scanners.<br />
5. Visual searching may supplement sensor coverage by filling in<br />
blind zones created by antenna configuration <strong>and</strong> physical or<br />
operational limitations of the electronic equipment.<br />
536 Coverage Factor (C)<br />
Coverage Factor (C) is a measure of search effectiveness or<br />
quality. It is used as an entering argument when calculating POD. In<br />
SAR action<br />
5-26