19.07.2013 Views

JP 3-50 National Search and Rescue Manual Vol I - US Navy

JP 3-50 National Search and Rescue Manual Vol I - US Navy

JP 3-50 National Search and Rescue Manual Vol I - US Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. POD can be increased by decreasing track spacing, but decreased<br />

track spacing means that more time is needed to search an area with the<br />

same number of SRUs. If extra time is not available, the search area<br />

may need to be reduced. Conversely, search area can be exp<strong>and</strong>ed by<br />

increasing track spacing, but this will decrease POD. Unless an optimum<br />

number of SRUs is available, the SMC must choose between the amount of<br />

area to be covered <strong>and</strong> the POD desired. See Figure 5-15.<br />

C. The practical limits of SRU turning radii <strong>and</strong> navigational<br />

accuracy limit how much track spacing can be reduced. Optimum track<br />

spacing yields maximum POD during the time available, consistent with<br />

the economical use of available SRUs.<br />

535 Sweep Width<br />

A. Sweep width (W) is the distance on both sides of the SRU where<br />

the probability of detecting a target outside of the sweep width is<br />

equal to the probability of missing a target inside that distance. It<br />

is a measure of detection capability based on target characteristics,<br />

weather, <strong>and</strong> other factors. Sweep width is less than twice the maximum<br />

detection range, which is the farthest range at which the target can be<br />

detected. See Figure 5-16. It is usually expressed in yards for<br />

underwater <strong>and</strong> ground searches, <strong>and</strong> in nautical miles for other types of<br />

searches. Use of the sweep width concept in any search allows solution<br />

of otherwise unworkable problems.<br />

B. Sweep width varies with the type of search conducted. Visual<br />

searching is used most often. However, sensor searches can be far more<br />

efficient than visual <strong>and</strong> should be considered when it is known, or even<br />

suspected, that the distressed craft or persons may be more readily<br />

detected by electronic or other nonvisual means.<br />

1. Sensors include radio, radar, magnetic, voltage, radioactive,<br />

infrared, ultraviolet, electro-optical, <strong>and</strong> other<br />

electromagnetic signal sensing equipment. Most common in SAR<br />

applications are radio <strong>and</strong> radar, with infrared becoming<br />

increasingly available. Detection range information may be<br />

available from parent agencies, operating comm<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

manufacturers, or operators. Chapter 6 has additional<br />

information on use of electronic equipment for searches.<br />

2. Each SAR agency should test its specific equipment to develop<br />

accurate estimates of sensor sweep width. Output power,<br />

reflective capabilities, antennae heights, environmental<br />

ambient noise <strong>and</strong> clutter levels, <strong>and</strong> other factors that<br />

affect the quality of sensor receiving <strong>and</strong> transmitting may<br />

affect sweep width.<br />

5-18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!