19.07.2013 Views

Untitled - NCRTM

Untitled - NCRTM

Untitled - NCRTM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- ,: < VOCATIONAL" REHBILITATION DEF[N<br />

e!{ th}+ enes Of" SClCeS deglgned to make eloyab[ those who.h¢ a vation<br />

Va9<br />

Te:: of vOon rhno,bt e d!sabled, ty, d the tate<br />

gOtc<br />

: PgSdg2.-sdlsty mas+a tofssl . dos .ysicN or mentN #ltro, whch-.-<br />

qetl0n qeligN f23ndivluats wth pfihmN ,ggies mast..be based upon comt<br />

Th6<br />

6mo¢,except :i] an adeqo¢_ psytoge+ "evatl :may-b@ substed in: behavior<br />

yejc<br />

&sor@ 3sg4 " e'hara6ted hy.etans bNafdr or iair,, aty: t car out.<br />

ts¢ reta£tig must'Be based on aqatR-pso[ogteat eVUNisng standrdmed.=<br />

A<br />

tStL antigence. (eg . }fi With;respect/to e 0 sceNone the<br />

lndlvldy(m&ijed<br />

range 5::7071s oe of aer>,[-ehHlty+.r vocatmnal gehab!n, .TNo or three "ONe: in each<br />

!] g; vt,bN +rehaift,n -sces.was roa to-mde (1) khe. met, andpheXaa:dt¢ldffNs<br />

n<br />

soflbv VoctionN:Rehihtatmn () IMidNs s--<br />

trffdNofi)<br />

bn U los pr;gNie or:s seriom restriction :su fidds, nvstausf oes!ve<br />

to e.BiNd;.2a;:@.,e.at.e:gnt. of:bhe Assfan. of e StaSe.of-WasNom


FINAL REPORT<br />

STATEWIDE PLANNING FOR<br />

COMPREHENSIVE<br />

REHABILITATION SERVICES<br />

VOCATIONAL<br />

STATE OF WASHINGTON<br />

C. CARSON<br />

DAVID<br />

Director<br />

Project<br />

PLANNING COMMISSION<br />

STATEWIDE<br />

VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

FOR<br />

Capitol Center Bldg.<br />

610<br />

Washington.<br />

Olympia,<br />

Period of Planning Project<br />

Inclusive<br />

23, 1967 May 22, 1969<br />

May<br />

plannlng program was supported by a grant, under Section 4(a).(2) (b),<br />

This<br />

the Rehabilitation Services Administration, Social and Rehabilitation<br />

from<br />

Service, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Chapter Page No.<br />

I SUMMARY<br />

II INTRODUCTION<br />

InformatiOn o__n Establishment o__f<br />

Backsround<br />

Planning Program<br />

Statewide<br />

Scope<br />

Objectives<br />

The Promise and Reality o__f Rehabilitation<br />

,Sym_P0sium<br />

Planning<br />

Agency<br />

Promise and Reality of Rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

Planning David C. Carson<br />

Agency<br />

for Psychological Service Needs in<br />

Planning<br />

Centers R. Kenneth Barnes..<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Relationship Between State and Local<br />

Potential<br />

Associations and Vocational<br />

Psychological<br />

Statewide Planning Salvatore G.<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

13<br />

DiMichael<br />

Aspects of Research in Personnel<br />

Relevant<br />

and Training- Jeffrey G. Shapiro..<br />

Selection<br />

Servicesand Community Action<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Guy A. Renzaglia<br />

Programs-<br />

III THE PLANNING ORGANIZATION<br />

Designated Or,ganization 37<br />

The Plannin$ Commission 37<br />

Statewide Advisory Committee 39<br />

Task Forces<br />

of responsibility<br />

Areas<br />

list of names see Appendix)<br />

(For<br />

16<br />

24<br />

39


Chapter Page No.<br />

IV<br />

Re$ional Committees<br />

of selection<br />

Method<br />

list of chairmen, see Appendix)<br />

(For<br />

Subcontractors<br />

Greenleigh Associates Inc.<br />

Legisi-ative Council<br />

Interasency L1alson<br />

and Facilities Planning Program,<br />

Workshop<br />

H. Jeynes<br />

Payson<br />

Cqmprehensive Health Planning<br />

Program Management Group<br />

at the universit of Washinston,<br />

Meeting<br />

1967 (For minutes, see Appendix)<br />

September,<br />

Services to the Deaf<br />

Agencies involved, purpose of council, etc..<br />

Trips to Rehabilitation Facilities<br />

The Staff<br />

Permanent<br />

and temporary<br />

Part-time<br />

Consulants<br />

Functions (Donated)<br />

Staff<br />

METHOD OF OPERATION<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

of Regions, selection of regional<br />

Determination<br />

selection of task forces, etc<br />

chairmen,<br />

Direction of task forces by Assistant Director..<br />

Description of task force responsibilities<br />

41<br />

41<br />

43<br />

43<br />

43<br />

44<br />

44<br />

44<br />

45<br />

45<br />

45<br />

45<br />

46<br />

47<br />

48<br />

50


Task Force Guidelines<br />

Task Force I The Prevalence of Disability...<br />

Force II Workshops-Facilities and<br />

Task<br />

Resources<br />

Task Force III- Interagency Coordination<br />

Force IV Vocational Training and<br />

Task<br />

Changes<br />

Technical<br />

Force V Barriers to Employment of the<br />

Task<br />

Handicapped<br />

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

of the Prevalence and Incidence of Handi-<br />

Estimates<br />

Persons<br />

capped<br />

Estimates of Vocational Rehabilitation Need<br />

The Physically Disabled<br />

Poverty<br />

Prevention of Disability<br />

State Institutions<br />

Adult Corrections<br />

State Hospitals<br />

Mental Retardation<br />

Juvenile Delinquency<br />

Sensory Handicapped<br />

Veterans' Facilities<br />

Implications<br />

Why the Need?<br />

Adequacy of Current Services<br />

Size of the Commitment<br />

Page No.<br />

51<br />

55<br />

61<br />

66<br />

72<br />

77<br />

80<br />

82<br />

92<br />

93<br />

94<br />

94<br />

¸95<br />

95<br />

96<br />

97<br />

98<br />

I00<br />

i00<br />

I00<br />

102


Rehabilitation?<br />

DVR Eligibility Requirements<br />

Disability<br />

Blind<br />

Deaf<br />

Dental Health<br />

Prosrams<br />

The Aging<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Correctional<br />

of Correctinl Pr.ogam<br />

Description<br />

A. Price<br />

Cecil<br />

to Conjugal'Visiting<br />

Alterna'tives<br />

Donald R. Johns, PhoD<br />

Economic Opportunity Programs<br />

and Workshops<br />

Facilities<br />

Rehabilitation Center<br />

Comprehensive<br />

Evaluation and Service Center<br />

Employment<br />

"Interim State Plan for_Workshops and<br />

From<br />

Facilities," by Payson H. Jeynes<br />

The Military Rejectee<br />

Assistance<br />

Public<br />

Statement E.M. Oliver<br />

by<br />

Migrants<br />

Security and Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Social<br />

by Donald Po Holden<br />

Statement<br />

Youth<br />

Disabled<br />

by Donald Hamilton<br />

Statement<br />

Workmen's Compensation<br />

Page No.<br />

102<br />

103<br />

107<br />

109<br />

109<br />

112<br />

117<br />

117<br />

i23<br />

130<br />

135<br />

136<br />

138<br />

147<br />

154<br />

154<br />

160<br />

160<br />

162<br />

164


nt.ergency Coordination of Service _rograms<br />

of Public Assistance, William Pope.<br />

Department<br />

for the Blind<br />

Services<br />

of Blindness<br />

Prevention<br />

Teacher-Counselor<br />

Employment Security Department, Mrs. Maxine Daly<br />

of Health<br />

Department<br />

Spielholz, M.D. and Rhesa Penn, M.D.<br />

Jess<br />

of Labor and Industries<br />

Department<br />

J. Petrie<br />

Harold<br />

of Institutions<br />

Department<br />

R. Conte, M.D.<br />

William<br />

State Employment Service<br />

MDTA Program<br />

Public Welfare<br />

Education ,...<br />

Voluntary Organizations<br />

Policy<br />

Manpower<br />

Rehabilitation as a Public Market<br />

Manpower<br />

Paul M. Ellwood, Jr., M.D<br />

Coordination with Other State Planning<br />

Poverty<br />

Mental Health Planning<br />

Retardation Planning<br />

Mental<br />

of Secondary Special Education<br />

Survey<br />

G. Newton Buker, Ph.D<br />

Regional Medical Program<br />

The<br />

Area Stroke Patient Bed Need<br />

Seattle<br />

Justus F. Lehmann, M.D<br />

Comprehensive Health Planning<br />

Government Reorganization<br />

.Administrative spect s<br />

Relations<br />

Public<br />

E. M. Oliver..<br />

Editorial,<br />

Pase No.<br />

167<br />

168<br />

169<br />

169<br />

170<br />

171<br />

175<br />

177<br />

182<br />

182<br />

182<br />

184<br />

184<br />

187<br />

187<br />

189<br />

192<br />

196<br />

199<br />

202<br />

203<br />

206<br />

206<br />

208<br />

-20g


and Operations Studies of<br />

Administrative<br />

Agency<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

House<br />

Harbridge<br />

Coordination Through Multi-<br />

Interagency<br />

Centers<br />

Service<br />

Centers<br />

Multi-Service<br />

New Concepts with Multi-Service Centers..<br />

Locations of the State<br />

Administrative<br />

Rehabilitation Agency<br />

Vocational<br />

Reorganization Priority" Inaugural<br />

"The<br />

Governor Daniel J. Evans<br />

Address,<br />

Recruitment, Training, and Utiliza-<br />

Personnel<br />

tion<br />

from "What New Programs and Which<br />

Excerpt<br />

Services?" H. J. Socolofsky<br />

New<br />

Needs in Rehabilitation, U. S.<br />

Personnel<br />

Education and Welfare<br />

Health<br />

Counselor Education Program<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

R. Forster, Ph.D<br />

Jerald<br />

of Completed Research<br />

Utilization<br />

the Information Explosion, Research<br />

Managing<br />

Brief, DHEW, 1969<br />

Special Plannin$ Topics<br />

Barriers<br />

Architectural<br />

Force V Report Bruce Johnson, Chairman<br />

Task<br />

Transportation<br />

to Congress<br />

Memorial.<br />

for the Blind<br />

Registry<br />

legislation<br />

Proposed<br />

National Rehabilitation Association<br />

Development and Placement<br />

Job<br />

from Report of Governor's Task Force<br />

Excerpts<br />

Executive Organization- Brewster C. Denny,<br />

on<br />

Chairman<br />

Vl THE COMPOSITE WORKING PLAN<br />

The Size of the Problem<br />

Pase N °<br />

Financing 239<br />

211<br />

212<br />

212<br />

213<br />

214<br />

215<br />

215<br />

217<br />

218<br />

219<br />

222<br />

223<br />

225<br />

226<br />

227<br />

227<br />

228<br />

229<br />

231<br />

.231<br />

232<br />

Z37<br />

237


Personnel to do the Job<br />

Training Programs<br />

Sabbatical Leave<br />

Manasement Study<br />

Record Keeping<br />

and Cooperation Amon$ Asencies<br />

Coordination<br />

Patterns of Service<br />

Better<br />

Government....<br />

Evaluation and Service Centers<br />

Employment<br />

the Disadvantaged<br />

for<br />

Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center<br />

Multi-Service Centers<br />

Dr. H. T. Buckner Rehabilitation Center<br />

The<br />

Injured Workmen, Seattle<br />

for<br />

Coordination with Education<br />

Rehabilitation and Health<br />

Seattle Artificial Kidney Center<br />

Blind<br />

Migrant Workers<br />

Indians<br />

Labor Orsanizations<br />

The Public Served<br />

How Shall Services be Delivered?<br />

A Needed Assessment of the Federal Prosram<br />

Why. the Emphasis on Vocational Rehabilitation?..<br />

Page No.<br />

242<br />

243<br />

244<br />

244<br />

245<br />

245<br />

245<br />

247<br />

248<br />

248<br />

249<br />

249<br />

250<br />

251<br />

251<br />

252<br />

252<br />

253<br />

253<br />

254<br />

256<br />

257<br />

258


REFERENCES<br />

APPENDICES<br />

Will Disability Rates Rise or Diminish?<br />

A Look at Washington Rehabilitants<br />

Lead Time in Staffin$<br />

Information GapBe$ins Early<br />

Directory<br />

APPENDIX A- Organizational Chart<br />

APPENDIX B Chairmen of Regional Committees..<br />

APPENDIX C Advisory Committees ..<br />

D Proposed Comprehensive Correctional<br />

APPENDIX<br />

Plan for Public Offenders<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Percy Bell and Gecil A. Price<br />

E A Meeting of Research Personnel<br />

APPENDIX<br />

of Washington, September 8, 1967.<br />

University<br />

Page No.<br />

259<br />

260<br />

264<br />

265<br />

266<br />

272<br />

278<br />

280<br />

282<br />

283<br />

298<br />

310


CHAPTER I<br />

SUMMARY<br />

particular chapter is printed separately. It contains<br />

This<br />

brief description of the project and all of the recommendations of<br />

a<br />

Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation for changes in<br />

the<br />

delivery of services to the handicapped and disadvantaged citizens<br />

the<br />

the state. Partially because of the timing at the end of the second<br />

of<br />

of thetwo-year project, it has been necessary that this longer<br />

year<br />

report, REHABILITATION ADVANCE, be bound without the summary chapter.<br />

distribution of the longer volume will be to libraries,<br />

The<br />

agencies both federal and state, offices of Vocational<br />

government<br />

and a few others. The summary volume which will be<br />

Rehabilitaton,<br />

in greater quantity will be distributed to all those receiving<br />

printed<br />

larger volume, plus many other people in the power structure of<br />

the<br />

state. Inquiries concerning these two volumes should be addressed<br />

the<br />

to Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, P. O. Box 528, Olympia ,98501<br />

are thus following the requirements in the Federal guide-<br />

We<br />

which state:<br />

lines,<br />

an essential means of achieving the objective of provid<br />

As<br />

rehabilitation services to all handicapped persons by<br />

ing<br />

i, 1975, or earlier, the State shall publish and<br />

July<br />

distribute the information contained in the final<br />

widely<br />

to the groups and organizations participating in<br />

report<br />

planning, to other interested groups and to the public<br />

the<br />

at<br />

large.


CHAPTER II<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

BackgroundInformation o__nEstablishment o__f Statewide PlanningProgram<br />

1965 Amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act,<br />

The<br />

Public Law 89-333, authorized a two-year program of grants<br />

Federal<br />

states to help plan the development of comprehensive vocational<br />

to<br />

services. The maximum annual grant to any one state<br />

rehabilitation<br />

$I00,000. Washington State received. S66,550 for its first year<br />

was<br />

operation, and $72,769 the second year, a total of $139,319 for<br />

of<br />

two years. The nationwide effort began in 1965, and in Washington<br />

the<br />

the planning project began May 23, 1967.<br />

State<br />

law and federal regulations specified that planning<br />

The<br />

be directed toward the orderly developmentof vocational<br />

should<br />

within each state, including services provided by<br />

rehabilitation<br />

nonprofit agencies, with an overall objective ineach state<br />

private,<br />

making vocational rehabilitation services available, by July i,<br />

of<br />

to all physically handicapped individuals needing services.<br />

1975,<br />

was made for grants to be given either to the<br />

Provision<br />

vocational rehabilitation agency or to a planning agency<br />

state<br />

by the Governor for this specific purpose. In the State<br />

established<br />

Washington @overnor Daniel J. Evans decided that the study would<br />

of<br />

developed by a commission which he appointed. With approval of<br />

be<br />

grant application by the federal agency and the release of funds,<br />

the<br />

Washington State got under way.<br />

Scope<br />

as<br />

follows:<br />

The scope of the study was outlined in the grant application<br />

statewide planning study shall include: (i) estimates<br />

The<br />

present and projected needs of the handicapped through<br />

of<br />

(2) assessments of the adequacy of present programs<br />

1975;<br />

resources in terms of present and projected needs;<br />

and<br />

(3) recommendations for the development of adequate<br />

and<br />

rehabilitation resources and programs vocational Within<br />

the state.<br />

goals of the Division in-terms of kind and quality<br />

Current<br />

services, as well as quantity, shall be studied and<br />

of


Obec tives<br />

made. The current rehabilitants of the<br />

recommendations<br />

will be evaluated to determine the need for any<br />

Division<br />

in present services. Attention will be given<br />

revisions<br />

planning for services to categories of disabled persons<br />

to<br />

which appear not to have been adequately served.<br />

adequacy of existing vocational rehabilitation facili-<br />

The<br />

will be determined. Considermtion will be given to<br />

ties<br />

services, vocational rehabilitation centers, psy-<br />

medical<br />

and psychiatric services, etc. which may be<br />

chological<br />

for the rehabilitation of the handicapped. Full<br />

required<br />

will be given to other studies being made,<br />

consideration<br />

those relating to sheltered workshops and facil-<br />

especially<br />

The study shall also concern itself with the ade-<br />

ities..<br />

of training opportunities and the availability of<br />

quacy<br />

personnel, with the adequacy of salaries for pro-<br />

trained<br />

staff, and other items felt to be important to<br />

fessional<br />

the needs of the handicapped.<br />

meeting<br />

project shall also study the size of various disability<br />

The<br />

their rates of growth, and services and re-<br />

populations,<br />

available to them. Disability categories to be<br />

sources<br />

will include, but not be limited to: blind, deaf,<br />

studied<br />

mentally ill, mentally retarded, older<br />

heart-cancer-stroke,<br />

public offenders, economically and culturally<br />

citizens,<br />

the military rejectee, the disabled of low<br />

disadvantaged,<br />

welfare recipient, rural disabled and urban dis-<br />

income,<br />

abled, and disabled youth.<br />

objectives of the study are also quoted in full from<br />

The<br />

grant application:<br />

the<br />

To identify by number and category through sample studies<br />

i.<br />

the handicapped population and by the use of current<br />

of<br />

past studies and reports those disabled within the<br />

and<br />

who are in need of vocational rehabilitation<br />

state<br />

services.<br />

To prepare a written plan which will identify, analyze<br />

2.<br />

evaluate program goals, and to present a planned<br />

and<br />

indicating staff and financial support needed<br />

program<br />

achieve a program which will provide full geographic<br />

to<br />

and include all programs offering vocational<br />

coverage<br />

services. Included will be planning for<br />

rehabilitation<br />

special facilities and workshops for the handicapped.


To determine the need for and utilization of special<br />

3.<br />

for the handicapped.<br />

facilities<br />

To identify the barriers that prevent or delay needed<br />

4.<br />

rehabilitation services for the handicapped.<br />

vocational<br />

To identify vocational rehabilitation resources required<br />

5.<br />

meet future needs, including necessary legislative<br />

to<br />

community support, costs and steps required to<br />

action,<br />

the achievement of statewide goals among the<br />

facilitate<br />

and voluntary programs at state and local<br />

governmental<br />

These will be expressed in both interim-and<br />

levels.<br />

long-term goals.<br />

To determine the ways in which governmental and voluntary<br />

6.<br />

may be coordinated and, if necessary, reorganized<br />

programs<br />

develop services to meet demonstrated needs more<br />

to<br />

effectively.<br />

State was one of the last of the states to apply<br />

Washington<br />

the grant. It was specified at first that the grant period would<br />

for<br />

March i, 1967. However, the Project Director was not selected<br />

begin<br />

much later. He began employment on June 20, 1967. As some of<br />

until<br />

costs of the Planning Commission had been spent on May 23, 1967,<br />

the<br />

became the formal date of beginning of the planning project.<br />

this<br />

After a year the grant was renewed for the second and final year.<br />

difficulty with the planning project as outlined is<br />

The<br />

inevitably it concentrates on one state. There is very little<br />

that<br />

from other states. This method of operation seems to insure<br />

input<br />

there will be 50 separate .plans for the 50 separate states, just<br />

that<br />

the present vocational rehabilitation programs in the 50 states<br />

as<br />

separate. There is a remarkable diversity of rehabilitation<br />

are<br />

in the 50 states. The planning projects help perpetuate this<br />

programs<br />

diversity.<br />

a number or regions of the United States, however, the<br />

In<br />

directors of the comprehensive statewide planning programs<br />

project<br />

brought together quarterly by the appropriate federal officials.<br />

were<br />

helped insure some regional direction. In the Federal Rehabili-<br />

This<br />

Services Administration Region IX, with headquarters in San<br />

tation<br />

no meetings of this kind wereheld. The Regional Assistant<br />

Francisco,<br />

Commissioner for Rehabilitation Services did not call such a meeting.<br />

grant application specified that there would be a coopera-<br />

The<br />

agreement between the States of Oregon and Washington for state-<br />

tive<br />

planning to meet the needs of the handicapped in the two states.<br />

wide<br />

of the use of established and proposed rehabilitation facili-<br />

Because<br />

ties, educational institutions, and private agencies which are not


dictated by geographical boundaries, and because the activities<br />

always<br />

the people and business flow across state boundaries, it was deemed<br />

of<br />

to disabled persons to have the bi-state agreement. Although<br />

important<br />

cooperative agreement was never signed by the appropriate officials<br />

the<br />

twoproject directors, Dan W. Schausten of Oregon and David C.<br />

the<br />

of Washington, advised each other of the program plans, methods<br />

Carson<br />

obtaining report materials, previous studies reviewed and analyzed,<br />

of<br />

proposed methods of implementation of program findings. The<br />

and<br />

of the two planning projects participated in public and private<br />

staffs<br />

in the two states. The Commission is particularly grateful<br />

meetings<br />

to Mr. Schausten and his staff for their fine cooperation.<br />

planning project was hampered by the difficulties<br />

The<br />

both in 1967 and 1968 by the Rehabilitation Services<br />

experienced<br />

and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation in the<br />

Administration<br />

of Washington. Federal budget reductions dealt catastrophic<br />

State<br />

to these two agencies, forcing them to concentrate on immediate<br />

blows<br />

rather than long-range planning. The mood of the agencies<br />

salvation<br />

depressed. Smooth functioning became jerky. Staff members forced<br />

was<br />

deny services to the handicapped were distressed. Vocational<br />

to<br />

in Washington State at least, has been shaken by the<br />

Rehabilitation,<br />

of fiscal year 1969. These wounds will be long in healing.<br />

events<br />

therapy from the Rehabilitation Services Administration was<br />

Possible.<br />

forthcoming.<br />

not<br />

In Addition<br />

Commission members, have been unusually conscientious<br />

The<br />

attendance at meetings and participation in other activities<br />

about<br />

the Planning Commission. They have worked to enact legislation<br />

of<br />

by the Commission. They hae been individually and<br />

recommended<br />

supportive of the staff. They have made fact-finding<br />

collectively<br />

to notable rehabilitation facilities within and without the<br />

trips<br />

They have chaired.regional committees and participated on<br />

state.<br />

forces. The staff was able to be together almost throughout<br />

task<br />

entire period. This continuity, both of secretarial and pro-<br />

the<br />

members, contributed substantially to the smooth function-<br />

fessional<br />

of the office. Temporary staff members were brought in to help<br />

ing<br />

peak periods.<br />

at<br />

this time the assistance of psychologists was solicited<br />

At<br />

the staff of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

by<br />

symposium was held at the American Psychological Associationmeet-<br />

A<br />

in San Francisco, California, on..September2,..1968... The..appro-<br />

ing<br />

title, of.this..symposium was THE PROMISE AND REALITY OF RER-<br />

priate<br />

AGENCY PLANNING. As this symposium was authorized by the<br />

ILITATION<br />

Commission, and because, the papers contain information<br />

Planning<br />

to the planning project, these papers are reprinted in full<br />

.relevant<br />

as<br />

follows:


Promise and Reality of<br />

The<br />

Agency Planning<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

for Psychological<br />

Planning<br />

Needs in Rehabilitation<br />

Service<br />

Centers<br />

Relationship Between<br />

Potential<br />

and Local Psychological<br />

State<br />

and Vocational<br />

Associations<br />

Statewide<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Planning<br />

Aspects of Research in<br />

Relevant<br />

Selection and<br />

Personnel<br />

Training<br />

Services and<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Action Programs<br />

Community<br />

SYMPOS IUM<br />

THE PROMISE AND REALITY OF REHABILITATION AGENCY PLANNING<br />

David C. Carson<br />

Chairman-<br />

Director<br />

Project<br />

Commission for Vocational<br />

Planning<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Olympia, Washington<br />

Kenneth Barnes<br />

R.<br />

Services Administration<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

and Rehabilitation Service<br />

Social<br />

of Health, Education,<br />

Department<br />

Welfare<br />

and<br />

D. C.<br />

Washington,<br />

G. DiMichael, Director<br />

Salvatore<br />

for the Crippled and<br />

Institute<br />

Disabled<br />

York City, N. Y.<br />

New<br />

G. Shapiro<br />

Jeffrey<br />

Health Services for the Deaf<br />

Mental<br />

Porter Neuropsychiatric<br />

Langley<br />

Institute<br />

San Francisco, California<br />

A. Renzaglia, Coordinator<br />

Guy<br />

Counseling<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Illinois University<br />

Southern<br />

Illinois<br />

Carbondale,<br />

symposium was presented at the 76th Annual Convention of the<br />

This<br />

Psychological Association on September 2, 1968 at the Mark<br />

American<br />

Hotel in San Francisco. It was co-sponsored by the Division<br />

Hopkins<br />

Psychological Aspects of Disability and the Division of Psychologists<br />

on<br />

in Public Service.


THE PROMISE AND REALITY OF REHABILITATION AGENCY PLANNING<br />

by<br />

C. Carson, Project Director<br />

David<br />

Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Planning<br />

Washington<br />

Olympia,<br />

rehabilitation, like many other services programs<br />

Vocational<br />

the United States Government, has expanded haphazardly. Although<br />

of<br />

than fifty years old, it has come to serve rather well the needs<br />

less<br />

one segment of the vocationally handicapped--the young, well-<br />

of<br />

orthopedic patient. Spotty success with the mentally ill,<br />

motivated<br />

retarded, and public offenders has been noted in some<br />

intellectually<br />

in the past decade. Rehabilitation techniques have not been<br />

states<br />

used on those most needy, i.e., the socially disadvantaged,<br />

widely<br />

the rural poor.<br />

most of the money for vocational rehabilitation<br />

Although<br />

from the Federal government, a large measure of state control<br />

comes<br />

exists, with varied levels of efficiency.<br />

training and standards for staff members have<br />

Professional<br />

slow in coming. Research has been a seldom-used tool. Depen-<br />

been<br />

for the handicapped has been induced or continued by lack of<br />

dency<br />

services.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

the 1965 Amendments to the Federal law, grants were<br />

In<br />

to the states for planning for rehabilitation programs so that<br />

made<br />

1975 all persons eligible for services would have them available.<br />

by<br />

to $i00,000 per year per state for two years was offered. Little<br />

Up<br />

control was imposed. Planning grants, although 100% Federal<br />

Federal<br />

were not even requested by some states. Some state agencies<br />

money,<br />

have been wary of the scrutiny they do permit.<br />

symposium members will discuss the benefits obtained<br />

The<br />

the rehabilitation planning projects, with emphasis on personnel<br />

from<br />

and the use of psychologists in rehabilitation programs,<br />

selection;<br />

rehabilitation centers, and community action programs.<br />

comprehensive<br />

rehabilitation receives $500,000,000 in Federal<br />

Vocational<br />

annually now. State and other matching funds are also provided<br />

funds<br />

rehabilitate handicapped adults. Those served include the physi-<br />

to<br />

disabled, the intellectually retarded, the mentally ill, the<br />

cally<br />

offenders, and the socially disadvantaged. There has been a<br />

public<br />

of agencies, both governmental and private, which serve<br />

proliferation<br />

the handicapped.


more persons of working age become disabled each<br />

However,<br />

than become rehabilitated. Nearly four million disabled people<br />

year<br />

in the backlog needing vocational rehabilitation services. The<br />

are<br />

in 1965 appropriated money to pay "...the cost of planning<br />

Congress<br />

the development of a comprehensive vocational rehabilitation<br />

for<br />

in each State, including the orderly development of services<br />

program<br />

resources (public and nonprofit private) so that by July I, 1975,<br />

and<br />

sooner, vocational rehabilitation services will be available to<br />

or<br />

handicapped individuals in the state. This planning shall include,<br />

all<br />

other things, estimates of present and projected vocational<br />

among<br />

needs through 1975; assessment of the adequacy of present<br />

rehabilitation<br />

and resources in terms of present and projected needs; and<br />

programs<br />

and description of the specific steps necessary for the<br />

delineation<br />

of adequate vocational rehabilitation resources and<br />

development<br />

programs within the state."<br />

planning has been partly successful in that in some<br />

This<br />

the rehabilitation agency has obtained realistic goals and<br />

states<br />

the best ever public support through planning.<br />

the past, part of the vocational rehabilitation program<br />

In<br />

have been characterized by this couplet of Alexander Pope:<br />

could<br />

Much was Believ?.d, but little understood,<br />

And to be dull was construed to be o_.<br />

four other participants in this symposium are each<br />

The<br />

leaders helping rehabilitation, an adolescent, become<br />

distinguished<br />

transformed. We are attempting to respond to this wisdom:<br />

without action is futile;<br />

Planning<br />

without planning is fatal.<br />

Action


FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICE NEEDS<br />

PLANNING<br />

REHABILITATION FACILITIES<br />

IN<br />

by<br />

Kenneth Barnes, Ed.D., Chief<br />

R.<br />

of Rehabilitation Facilities<br />

Division<br />

of Health, Education, and Welfare<br />

Department<br />

Washington, D. C.<br />

facilities in the United States are experi-<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

a number of changes which necessitate our planning for new<br />

encing<br />

of rehabilitation services, and for improved techniques of<br />

patterns<br />

rehabilitation services to the handicapped and disadvantaged.<br />

providing<br />

are 1105 rehabilitation workshops and 185 rehabilita-<br />

There<br />

centers--as well as countless rehabilitation clinics, halfway<br />

tion<br />

and one-stop multiservice centers--known to the U.S. Rehabili-<br />

houses,<br />

Services Administration's Division of Rehabilitation Facilities.<br />

tation<br />

facilities typically offer their client populations a variety of<br />

These<br />

services including evaluation, psychological counseling, per-<br />

formal<br />

adjustment training, medical management, and vocational training.<br />

sonal<br />

(1959) denotes that within this framework, there are several<br />

DiMichael<br />

for providing psychological services to clients. Potentially<br />

avenues<br />

services may be rendered by counselors, psychometrists, staff<br />

the<br />

and outside psychologists, each operating at his level<br />

psychologists,<br />

competence, and with clients whom he is qualified to serve by<br />

of<br />

training and experience.<br />

its very nature, the rehabilitation facility furnishes<br />

By<br />

setting, through a team approach, focusing on the changing needs<br />

the<br />

the disabled person, to accomplish what the counselor and the<br />

of<br />

agency cannot do as well on an individual basis.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

Presenting this paper, three points are made. First, the<br />

In<br />

facility is more than just another service that can be<br />

rehabilitation<br />

It offers, through a variety of psychological evaluations,<br />

purchased.<br />

evaluations, work sample testings, job-try-outs, and its<br />

vocational<br />

therapeutic milieu, a process the dominant value of which<br />

unique<br />

is the non-verbal aspect of work.<br />

largely<br />

as discussed in The Report of the National Citizens<br />

Secondly,<br />

Committee on Vocational Rehabilitation (1968), rehabilitation<br />

Advisory<br />

confronted by a new kind of specialized problem; namely, the tremen-<br />

is<br />

number of men, women, and children--in addition to the "frankly"<br />

dous<br />

and mentally disabled--whose handicaps are primarily social,<br />

physically<br />

educational, and economic. To cope with the problems and<br />

cultural,


of these disadvantaged is to visualize "need groupings" that<br />

needs<br />

and to implement progress to meet these particular types of<br />

exist<br />

need.<br />

thirdly, the rhetoric of the psychologist abounds in<br />

And,<br />

manipulation and verbal interpretations. Admitting and accept-<br />

verbal<br />

the success of the psychological model for upper and middle class<br />

ing<br />

it is submitted that we cannot solve the awesome problems of<br />

America,<br />

disabled and most disadvantaged unless we apply the more non-<br />

many<br />

work model or environmental manipulation model, not reluctantly,<br />

verbal<br />

enthusiastically, throughout the rehabilitation processes offered<br />

but<br />

facilities.<br />

in<br />

the above points in mind, the position stated here is<br />

With<br />

psychological services in rehabilitation facilities must be<br />

that<br />

to the total needs of the handicapped or disadvantaged client.<br />

oriented<br />

since the fully functioning, competent person in our modern<br />

Further,<br />

society is expected to be gainfully occupied, work itself<br />

industrial<br />

a special role to play in evaluating and supporting one's progress<br />

has<br />

toward being the "complete being."<br />

agencies will continue to serve the physically<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

target group of the 1940's and both the physically and<br />

handicapped<br />

handicapped of the 1950's. Beyond these diagnostically recog-<br />

mentally<br />

groups, however, the American public of the late 1960's is<br />

nizable<br />

that vocational rehabilitation make contributions to the<br />

demanding<br />

of the nation by serving the variety of groups identified by<br />

welfare<br />

or more sociological characteristics lately labeled the "culturally<br />

one<br />

The culturally disadvantaged is defined in Section 15<br />

disadvantaged."<br />

the 1968 Vocational Rehabilitation amendments as (a) handicapped<br />

of<br />

as defined in section Ii (b) of this Act, frankly physically<br />

individuals<br />

mentally disabled; individuals disadvantaged by reason of their<br />

and<br />

or advanced age, low educational attainments, ethnic or cultural<br />

youth<br />

prison or delinquency records, or other conditions which con-<br />

factors,<br />

a barrier to employment; and (c) other members of their families<br />

stitute<br />

the provision of vocational rehabilitation services to family<br />

when<br />

is necessary for the rehabilitation of an individual described<br />

members<br />

clause (a) or (b)." Therefore, in serving this vast group it is<br />

in<br />

to be aware that it now becomes incumbent on rehabilitation<br />

important<br />

and facilities to mount a program to serve the needs of not<br />

agencies<br />

the disabled who represent their primary mission, but also many<br />

only<br />

of disadvantaged who may need the services, setting and<br />

thousands<br />

upon self-help characteristic of the rehabilitation model,<br />

emphasis<br />

to assist them in their quest for personal dignity and well-being.<br />

pervasive problem that perplexed rehabilitation personnel<br />

A<br />

the last score of years was the matter of eligibility for service.<br />

in<br />

upon a time, the same rehabilitation counselor who would have<br />

Once<br />

eligible for service a John Kennedy for his "bad back," also<br />

declared<br />

most likely would have rejected an Oswald for "no diagnostically


disability." These unimaginative administrative and<br />

identifiable<br />

legal, interpretations were resolved by the 1965 and 1967<br />

perhaps<br />

Rehabilitation Act amendments which clarified the concept<br />

Vocational<br />

disability to emphasize the behavioral disorders and the disadvan-<br />

of<br />

taged.<br />

now to the "nuts and bolts" of the kinds of psychological<br />

And<br />

envisioned as meeting the needs of clients to be served in<br />

services<br />

rehabilitation facilities.<br />

evaluation based on professional understanding<br />

Psychological<br />

standardized testing in the assessment and prediction of individual<br />

of<br />

of aptitudes, abilities, and interests may well represent the<br />

patterns<br />

for the evaluation process. Such evaluation can and should<br />

backbone<br />

an integral part of the rehabilitation process for most rehabili-<br />

be<br />

clients. Psychometric testing is accomplished by both the<br />

tation<br />

and the rehabilitation counselor--each at his level of<br />

psychologist<br />

As discussed by Wright and Cull (1968), rehabilitation<br />

competence.<br />

are expected to function generally in the provision of<br />

counselors<br />

evaluation at Level B (as identified by the A.P.A.<br />

psychological<br />

of Representatives). It is important that the rehabilitation<br />

Council<br />

be well-grounded in psychology, since evaluation in rehabili-<br />

counselor<br />

is the basis for rehabilitation diagnosis and for vocational<br />

tation<br />

If not qualified to test the rehabilitation counselor<br />

planning.<br />

secure these services from a qualified psychologist--for it is<br />

should<br />

rehabilitation counselor's responsibility to see that all clients<br />

the<br />

those necessary services which will insure satisfactory voca-<br />

receive<br />

social, and economic adjustment.<br />

tional,<br />

the past several years we have seen the introduction and<br />

In<br />

use of another evaluation technique known as "vocational<br />

expanded<br />

Gregman (1968) commented that the field of rehabilitation<br />

evaluation."<br />

hailed this process as a panacea in overcoming the limitations of<br />

has<br />

psychological tests. On the other hand, psychologists<br />

standardized<br />

questioned its use because reliability and validity in the<br />

have<br />

and use of most work samples have not been proved. The<br />

construction<br />

has the attraction of face validity, of course. Three<br />

technique<br />

bases to vocational evaluation, job try-out, work sample<br />

historical<br />

and therapeutic milieu are an integral part of the process<br />

testing,<br />

being used today.<br />

Evaluation via simulated tasks also appears a<br />

Vocational<br />

tool to test the non-verbal client, the illiterate, the<br />

suitable<br />

damaged, and others for whom the limitations of many standard-<br />

brain<br />

psychological tests are obvious. In his paper on ized "Simulated<br />

Walker (1968) states that in using simulated tasks, a more or<br />

Tasks,"<br />

direct measure of learning ability is obtained by replicating<br />

less<br />

job or learning situation to which the client will have to go<br />

that<br />

leaving the rehabilitation facility.<br />

upon<br />

i0


technology of client evaluation, that of "work<br />

Another<br />

is built upon the findings of the vocational evaluation<br />

adjustment"<br />

the general principles of human behavior and its capability for<br />

and<br />

A good work adjustment program is designed to enhance those<br />

change.<br />

which relate to real life work criteria and which are identi-<br />

aspects<br />

by the vocational evaluation process as being correctable<br />

fied<br />

deficiency in the client's behavior affecting his employability.<br />

and Cohen (1966) report that over half of the<br />

Speiser<br />

facilities in the United States have vocational evalua-<br />

rehabilitation<br />

or work adjustment programs, the majority of them having been<br />

tion<br />

in the past two years. At this early stage in the develop-<br />

established<br />

of the relatively new vocational evaluation and work adjustment<br />

ment<br />

it is recognized that there is no clear-cut understanding<br />

technique,<br />

the precise results that can be expected fr6m them and how they<br />

of<br />

fit into the over-all pattern of rehabilitation facility services.<br />

will<br />

can be said, however, that they are non-verbal psychological tools<br />

It<br />

like the three-legged stool, may stand as equal partners in the<br />

which,<br />

development and assessment of evaluation services.<br />

summary, the ways of the past are no longer adequate to<br />

In<br />

needs of the present. In modern rehabilitation center planning,<br />

the<br />

no longer need, nor can we afford the luxury of fragmented or<br />

we<br />

tightly structured services. Rather, the Center must be<br />

traditional,<br />

in character, creative and flexible in outlook,<br />

multi-dimensional<br />

and highly oriented along functional lines. Only in this<br />

adaptable,<br />

can we reach the new and growing disabled and disadvantaged popula-<br />

way<br />

it is our challenge as well as our opportunity.<br />

tions;<br />

ii


Bregman, Morton,<br />

References<br />

"Vocational Evaluation; Use and Misuse,<br />

Evaluation and Work .Adjustment Bulletin,<br />

Vocational<br />

Wisconsin: I, 2, p.6, Spring 1968<br />

Menomonie,<br />

Salvatore G., Pscholo$ical Services in Vocational<br />

DiMichael,<br />

Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing<br />

Rehabilitation,<br />

Office, 1959<br />

S., and Cohen, M., "The Current Status of Vocational<br />

Speiser,<br />

and Pre-Vocational Evaluation Training Programs in the<br />

Evaluation<br />

States," Report of Trainin$ Institutes on Factors of Work<br />

United<br />

p.5, May 1966<br />

Evaluation,<br />

S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National<br />

U.<br />

Advisory Committee on Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />

Citizens<br />

of the National Citizens Advisory Committee on Vocational<br />

Report<br />

Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office,<br />

Rehabilitation,<br />

p.5, June 1968<br />

Keith, and Cull, John, "Psychological Testing in the<br />

Wright,<br />

Setting," Richmond, Virginia: (Unpublished paper),<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

1968<br />

12


of Statewide Rehabilitation Planning<br />

Relationship<br />

Psychological Associations<br />

With<br />

G. DiMichael, Ph.D., Director<br />

Salvatore<br />

for the Crippled and Disabled<br />

Institute<br />

New York City, New York<br />

primary aim of statewide rehabilitation planning is to<br />

The<br />

about social action in behalf of handicapped people, some of<br />

bring<br />

are being helped and many more who should be served. The major<br />

whom<br />

of statewide planning meshes nicely with the objectives of state-<br />

aim<br />

associations of psychologists and indeed also with the bylaws of<br />

wide<br />

American Psychological Association. In formal organizational<br />

the<br />

of psychologists there is clear expression of intent to<br />

statements<br />

the personal and social life of individuals and groups. In<br />

improve<br />

area of rehabilitation, we find no political controversy but<br />

the<br />

a fairly unanimous conviction on the values of giving special<br />

rather<br />

to groups of handicapped people. In view of the close over-<br />

services<br />

of interests on the part of statewide rehabilitation planning<br />

lapping<br />

state psychological associations, we would hope that joint efforts<br />

and<br />

be made that will benefit everyone involved, especially the handi-<br />

will<br />

capped.<br />

some states a continuing relationship between the rehabili-<br />

In<br />

agency and the state psychological association already exists.<br />

tation<br />

is no denying that the relationship can be stepped up and in-<br />

There<br />

There will be many common areas of concern, a number of<br />

tensified.<br />

we will mention in this paper. Where the states do not have such<br />

which<br />

we would hope that they would be set up.<br />

relationships,<br />

would heartily hope that state psychological associations<br />

We<br />

both the ready inclination and vigor in taking the initiative for<br />

show<br />

on rehabilitation planning as an occasion for more pro-<br />

capitalizing<br />

common effort. As a parallel illustration, we could mention<br />

ductive<br />

in the area of organized medicine, a nationwide effort has been<br />

that,<br />

to encourage states to set up a committee on rehabilitation.<br />

made<br />

state organizations have formal support and continuing encourage-<br />

The<br />

from the American Medical Association. We would hope that the<br />

ment<br />

psychological associations would set up a special committee on<br />

state<br />

on several fronts.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

area, for example, could deal with the referral of<br />

One<br />

who come to the attention of psychologists. There is no<br />

clients<br />

that psychologists can look to the rehabili-tation agencies to<br />

doubt<br />

some special services, not otherwise available to the clients<br />

provide<br />

on September 2, 1968, at the annual meeting of the<br />

Delivered<br />

Psychological Association.<br />

American<br />

13


they serve. In addition, there is decided advantage in having<br />

which<br />

help of psychologists to identify handicapped clients and provide<br />

the<br />

with opportunities for rehabilitation and for more productive<br />

them<br />

to society.<br />

contributions<br />

another front, we would look for leadership by the state<br />

On<br />

associations in encouraging training courses for psychol-<br />

psychological<br />

in universities within the boundaries of the state. We know<br />

ogists<br />

well that there is a dearth of psychologists trained in working<br />

too<br />

the handicapped. We would hope that state psychological associ-<br />

with<br />

would bring to the attention of prospective psychology trainees<br />

ations<br />

importance and value of working with handicapped people. We would<br />

the<br />

hope that the universities would work together, at least on a<br />

also<br />

level, to conserve the training resources and to see that over-<br />

state<br />

and duplication is brought to a minimum.<br />

lapping<br />

another front, we would expect that professional consult-<br />

On<br />

assistance to the state rehabilitation agency would be provided<br />

ative<br />

the psychological association. There is a need for developing<br />

by<br />

standards and guides for inclusion of handicapped groups, such<br />

better<br />

the mentally retarded, the behaviorally disordered, the emotionally<br />

as<br />

and the minimally brain damaged to mention but a few groups.<br />

disturbed<br />

behaviorally disordered are mentioned in legislation but guides<br />

The<br />

the identification and eligibility of such groups are not ex-<br />

for<br />

described in functional terms for most rehabilitation agencies.<br />

plicitly<br />

more can be done in helping the rehabilitation agencies<br />

Considerably<br />

refine criteria and guides for evaluation, treatment, service and<br />

to<br />

follow-up.<br />

area for common effort is that of helping to support<br />

Another<br />

for substantially increased appropriations that could be used<br />

requests<br />

by state agencies in behalf of handicapped people. At<br />

advantageously<br />

present time, this is a crucial area in view of the intense com-<br />

the<br />

between agencies and due to the many demands being made on<br />

petition<br />

income. It is our belief that the state psychological associ-<br />

state<br />

have not sufficiently devoted themselves to this practical<br />

ations<br />

crucial area. In view of the lack of controversy about the values<br />

and<br />

rehabilitation, we would think that the state psychological associ-<br />

of<br />

would have no fear of stirring up a problem in the political<br />

ation<br />

Indeed, there is a wholesome bipartisan climate behind the<br />

arena.<br />

effort at the present time.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

would also expect that the psychological associations<br />

We<br />

be continuously concerned with efforts for improvement in<br />

would<br />

and quantity of rehabilitation services. This is no easy<br />

quality<br />

at the present time because of necessarily limited resources<br />

matter<br />

manpower and appropriations. We have to see that the services of<br />

in<br />

are brought to as many people as possible, with high<br />

psychologists<br />

However, the notion that considerable time spent with clients<br />

quality.<br />

indicative of high quality is an attitude that must be scrutinized<br />

is<br />

14


great care. On the financial side, we must see that professional<br />

with<br />

are established which are fair to both the rehabilitation agency<br />

fees<br />

and to psychologists.<br />

in the larger state agencies there should be a<br />

Certainly<br />

consultant on staff. This position is found with con-<br />

psychological<br />

infrequency, and perhaps this is a partial index of the fact<br />

siderable<br />

state psychological associations should be more intensively con-<br />

that<br />

cerned with the problems of handicapped people.<br />

brief, there are many ways, only some have been mentioned<br />

In<br />

this paper, in which state psychological associations can foster<br />

in<br />

and better professional help to the handicapped. The occasion<br />

more<br />

statewide rehabilitation planning could serve to spearhead a mount-<br />

of<br />

and visible effort to enhance the services of psychology and psy-<br />

ing<br />

in behalf of the handicapped. State psychological associ-<br />

chologists<br />

gain their strength from the services of individual psycholo-<br />

ations<br />

as leaders of their peers. We would hope that a number of psy-<br />

gists<br />

would now assume leadership and serve as catalysts for<br />

chologists<br />

about concerted and well directed efforts to enhance the<br />

bringing<br />

of the state and local psychological associations with those of<br />

aims<br />

objectives of statewide rehabilitation planning.<br />

the<br />

15


TRAINING, AND MANPOWER RECRUITMENT<br />

SELECTION,<br />

REHABILITATION i.<br />

IN<br />

G. Shapiro, Ph.D.<br />

Jeffrey<br />

Health Services For The Deaf<br />

Mental<br />

Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute<br />

The<br />

Francisco, California<br />

San<br />

is little need to document the growing demand for<br />

There<br />

services, and the lack of traditionally-trained man-<br />

rehabilitation<br />

to meet this demand. Further, the inability of training insti-<br />

power<br />

to meet the training needs is also generally accepted. This<br />

tutions<br />

has often been responded to by hiring nonprofessional person-<br />

dilemma<br />

This is usually seen as a method of temporarily filling the gap<br />

nel.<br />

until professionals can be recruited, trained, and employed.<br />

may in many cases be the workers of choice,<br />

Nonprofessionals<br />

if they can be selected carefully. This paper will discuss<br />

however,<br />

new ideas in regard to recruitment and training of personnel,<br />

some<br />

then detail a source from which new nonprofessional workers could<br />

and<br />

be found.<br />

from theory articulated by Carl Rogers (1951)<br />

Developing<br />

Charles Truax (1963), a concept of help-giving can be constructed<br />

and<br />

is in only a very limited respect dependent on professional<br />

which<br />

as preparation (Shapiro, 1967). The important variables in<br />

training<br />

are similar to personality variables: they are inter-<br />

help-giving<br />

characteristics which are habitually used by an individual,<br />

personal<br />

than learned behaviors which one puts on and takes off in the<br />

rather<br />

counseling situation.<br />

specific<br />

has suggested that genuineness, empathy, and warmth<br />

Research<br />

effective counseling traits in changing client behavior and person-<br />

are<br />

(Truax and Carkhuff, 1967). From this research has come a pro-<br />

ality<br />

which is not particularly complicated, and which verifies the<br />

posal<br />

previous beliefs of many professionals. Very simply, there is now<br />

The original version of this paper, presented at the American<br />

i.<br />

Association Convention September 2, 1968, in San<br />

Psychological<br />

California, was supported in part through National<br />

Francisco,<br />

of Mental Health Grant No. 12306-02 and by a Research<br />

Institute<br />

Training Center Division Grant (RT-13) from the Social and<br />

and<br />

Service, Department of Health, Education, and<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Washington, D.C. Manuscript preparation was aided<br />

Welfare,<br />

Social and Rehabilitation Service Grant RD-2835-S-68.<br />

through<br />

16


evidence that some counselors are more effective than others, and<br />

good<br />

have more positive impact on their clients than do others.<br />

regularly<br />

that the characteristics of these more helpful counselors are<br />

And,<br />

obvious personality traits which are effective in changing be-<br />

fairly<br />

havior in a variety of settings.<br />

implications of this belief have led us (and many others)<br />

The<br />

experimentation. If the personal qualities of genuineness, empathy,<br />

to<br />

warmth predict those more effective counselors, perhaps the other<br />

and<br />

traditionally thought to be necessary for counseling<br />

characteristics<br />

less important. Training in an academic institution has been<br />

are<br />

a necessary prerequisite to be a counselor in most pro-<br />

considered<br />

agencies. A bachelor's or perhaps even a Master's degree<br />

fessional<br />

required for consideration for a position. If one believes that<br />

was<br />

characteristics are the important variables in effective<br />

personality<br />

however, one might wonder if nonprofessionals who were in-<br />

counseling,<br />

herently therapeutic might not make effective counselors.<br />

concept was investigated at a residential rehabilitation<br />

This<br />

of over 300 beds in Hot Springs, Arkansas. The cliente is a<br />

center<br />

one, and the principal mission of the center is to provide the<br />

mixed<br />

who are called students, with the counseling and vocational<br />

clients,<br />

necessary to control their own lives after two to nine months<br />

training<br />

training. In a series of studies directed by Charles Truax, and<br />

of<br />

outstanding support of the training team in Hot Springs, some<br />

with<br />

conclusions were reached.<br />

interesting<br />

taken from the staff at the Rehabilitation<br />

Secretaries<br />

were found to be effective counselors. With day-to-day super-<br />

Center<br />

by regular staff members, they proved to be successful. The<br />

vision<br />

counselors were given a full case load, and were asked to<br />

untrained<br />

coordinate the case and deal on a day-to-day basis with problems<br />

both<br />

might come up. The secretaries who counseled the students were<br />

which<br />

by referral sources from around the state to have been just<br />

perceived<br />

useful to their students as trained counselors. Furthermore, there<br />

as<br />

no major differences between those counseled by trained and those<br />

were<br />

by untrained staff in regard to students' progress through<br />

counseled<br />

the Rehabilitation Center (Truax, 1967).<br />

study, and several others which could be quoted, have<br />

This<br />

in our minds a thorough re-examination of the nature of help-<br />

raised<br />

Theoretical work by Albee (1968) and Berenson and Carkhuff<br />

giving.<br />

have also influenced our thinking.<br />

(1967)<br />

general theory which makes this work relevant to hiring<br />

The<br />

in rehabilitation is that the skills which must be learned<br />

practices<br />

those who will be hired as nonprofessionals are less important<br />

by<br />

their over-all therapeutic and motivational thrust. Rehabili-<br />

than<br />

after whatever physical restorations are necessary, is in<br />

tation,<br />

part an interpersonal process. The rehabilitation client must<br />

large<br />

choose a career objective, must be trained for that career, must find<br />

17


job, and must stay on the job. All of these steps are undertaken<br />

a<br />

the presence of a counselor, trainer or employer, as well as other<br />

in<br />

who are undergoing the same process. The interpersonal variables<br />

peers<br />

are effective in counseling and psychotherapy can be effective<br />

which<br />

other roles as well. As one example, teachers in normal classrooms<br />

in<br />

are rated as more therapeutic are able to help theirstudents earn<br />

who<br />

grades and assimilate more knowledge than those teachers who<br />

better<br />

rated as less therapeutic (Aspy, 1965). The same findings hold<br />

are<br />

although to a less striking degree, in 200 rehabilitation clients<br />

ture,<br />

the Hot Springs Center (Truax and Carkhuff, 1967). That is, those<br />

at<br />

instructors offering higher levels of genuineness, empathy,<br />

vocational<br />

warmth elicited from their students more cooperation in the courses,<br />

and<br />

more dependable behavior, and a better quality of work.<br />

this point, it may be useful to discuss the question of<br />

At<br />

Again, most basically, the therapeutic potential of the<br />

training.<br />

is often more important than the content of the training. Up<br />

trainer<br />

now many agencies have used as trainers individuals who were senior<br />

to<br />

the organization, were tired of seeing clients on their own, were<br />

in<br />

facile, or were advanced in research techniques. None of<br />

verbally<br />

kinds of people are necessarily better trainers. We should begin<br />

these<br />

choose as trainers those individuals who have showed themselves com-<br />

to<br />

in helping clients. They may not necessarily be able to verbal-<br />

petent<br />

what they are doing, but they can serve as role models for those<br />

ize<br />

will be soon acting in the same position that they (the trainers)<br />

who<br />

did, as well as providing the same therapeutic thrust for the<br />

once<br />

staff that they did for their clients.<br />

as counselors differentially affect their clients,<br />

Just<br />

many instructors differentially affect students, so trainers<br />

and<br />

affect counselors or instructors-to-be. All of us<br />

differentially<br />

attended training sessions which have had impact on us and on<br />

have<br />

rest of the audience, which have opened up to us the possibility<br />

the<br />

we could be serving our clients in a more helpful fashion. And<br />

that<br />

have also sat through programs which have deadened us, made us<br />

we<br />

away, and which we have forgotten as soon as we got over the<br />

turn<br />

headache they elicited.<br />

both in academic institutions where they are<br />

Trainers,<br />

teachers or professors, and in training sessions in our own<br />

called<br />

have the same dual effects. Some make possible a positive<br />

agencies,<br />

in those who will serve clients, and some do not. It should<br />

change<br />

possible to pick out those rehabilitation workers who have been<br />

be<br />

moving their clients and let others watch them work. The<br />

really<br />

workers should be given a preliminary set to attend to the<br />

other<br />

instructor's style, rather than his subject matter. The same<br />

model<br />

be done for counselors and for others in the rehabilitation team<br />

can<br />

provide service and who are expected to change their clients.<br />

who<br />

direct interaction between trainers and staff should have<br />

Further,<br />

impact upon staff, helping them in turn to be more thera-<br />

therapeutic<br />

peutic with their clients.<br />

18


these trainers may not be the individuals who will<br />

Again,<br />

become administrators, or who enjoy attending meetings, or who<br />

ever<br />

been with the agency for long periods of time. They are simply<br />

have<br />

effective than others. They should be encouraged to take part<br />

more<br />

in training, either in discussion groups or through example.<br />

A New Source of Rehabilitation Personnel<br />

it has been argued that the differences between<br />

Thus,<br />

and ineffective helpers, and effective and ineffective<br />

effective<br />

are relatively unrelated to professionalization. These<br />

trainers,<br />

are unimportant, however, if rehabilitation agencies are<br />

matters<br />

able to choose between prospective employees. And, at the<br />

not<br />

time, this is the case. In many agencies, especially at the<br />

present<br />

levels of employment, almost anyone with the degree require-<br />

higher<br />

is a good candidate for a job. Many agencies are not in the<br />

ments<br />

of trying to choose between a number of highly qualified<br />

difficulty<br />

Instead, they are busy recruiting, near and far, to try<br />

applicants.<br />

find someone who ht be interested in working for them. For<br />

to<br />

reason, much of the above is beside the point. Agencies are not<br />

this<br />

the position of choosing the most helpful, for the most part, but<br />

in<br />

finding someone.<br />

in<br />

discussing new personnel, we in rehabilitation must<br />

Before<br />

that our services are considered far less important than<br />

understand<br />

work of many other segments of American society. We must also<br />

the<br />

to understand why certain forces in our society are perfectly<br />

learn<br />

happy to keep us relatively unimportant.<br />

the present time there is a widespread lack of accep-<br />

At<br />

of the spending of tax dollars for welfare programs in this<br />

tance<br />

The ease with which the United States Congress passed the<br />

country.<br />

items for the military as compared with the difficulty<br />

big-budget<br />

which War on Poverty money is appropriated is an example of the<br />

with<br />

of those who are elected. We begin with only a small per-<br />

commitment<br />

of the funds to be appropriated, and we are cut still further<br />

centage<br />

there is trimming to be done. On the other hand, past, present,<br />

when<br />

future wars account for well over 50% of the national budget, and<br />

and<br />

expanded rapidly and with little controversy whenever the pro-<br />

are<br />

fessionals in command, the army, request such growth.<br />

correlate of the power of the military is our country's<br />

A<br />

to a period of military training for young men. This is<br />

commitment<br />

as a way for a boy to become a man, to stabilize hisself-concept<br />

seen<br />

his interests, and to develop a way of life which will be useful<br />

and<br />

him in the future. Older teen-agers who get into trouble with the<br />

to<br />

are often given a choice between a term in prison or joining one<br />

law<br />

the armed forces. Students in college who are unsure of their goals<br />

of<br />

who are earning failing grades, are often encouraged to "grow up"<br />

or<br />

taking a two-year hitch in the military. This belief in the military<br />

by<br />

a positive training experience goes beyond any expectation that the<br />

as<br />

19


man is "serving his country"; serve he may, but he is also<br />

military<br />

to be well served by the military. It is also not vitiated<br />

thought<br />

the strong anti-military, anti-draft stands of a sizable minority<br />

by<br />

college students and a probable majority of college students in<br />

of<br />

more prestigious schools. Although some students otally reject<br />

the<br />

kind of regimentation and philosophy forced upon those who are<br />

the<br />

for the military, more are rejecting the current adventure in<br />

trained<br />

and accept the military as a reasonable problem-solving device,<br />

Vietnam,<br />

so also presumably accept its training as a generally reasonable<br />

and<br />

structure.<br />

than fifty years ago William James (1910) suggested<br />

More<br />

nations ought to adopt a moral equivalent to war. By this he<br />

that<br />

a draft army of young men who would spend several years in some<br />

meant<br />

occupation, one which required the positive qualities then<br />

service<br />

to the military. Essentially, James was arguing that every<br />

attributed<br />

chooses for itself an area of strong commitment, and that one<br />

society<br />

to overcome the emphasis on the destructive forces of warfare was<br />

way<br />

direct society's energies in another direction.<br />

to<br />

we redefine America's goals so that a period of time<br />

Can<br />

in rehabilitative work will be considered the kind of service<br />

spent<br />

young men and women might wish to give to their society? Can<br />

which<br />

learn to believe that a two-year Peace Corps experience, a one-year<br />

we<br />

experience, a one-year rehabilitation experience will accomplish<br />

VISTA<br />

same ends we currently expect from the armed forces? I do not<br />

the<br />

to suggest that we should draft men and women for reconstructive<br />

mean<br />

with individuals or groups who could use rehabilitative services,<br />

work<br />

that this work be both available and recommended to the youth of<br />

but<br />

country.<br />

this<br />

service has already been pioneered by the Federal<br />

Voluntary<br />

with the Peace Corps, VISTA, and other programs. These<br />

Government<br />

however, select only the most able, and so large numbers of<br />

groups,<br />

men and women who might make some contribution are selected out.<br />

young<br />

Job Corps has a different bias, and though administered as a train-<br />

The<br />

and service agency selects out the unpoor and the able.<br />

ing<br />

and Riessman (1965) and others have discussed the use<br />

Pearl<br />

large groups of nonprofessionals in providing human service to others.<br />

of<br />

they have concentrated upon the poor, their concepts can be<br />

Though<br />

to a full-scale program of Voluntary Service for Youth. Several<br />

adapted<br />

groups (Latter Day Saints and Friends, among others) have had<br />

religious<br />

experience administering similar programs.<br />

extensive<br />

fully-developed service will have a measurable impact on<br />

A<br />

in young America, on the quality and extent of social<br />

unemployment<br />

offered to all Americans (and, other nations as well), and in<br />

services<br />

value structure of Americans. Grandiose? Certainly! But possible.<br />

the<br />

20


such a program will require that funds at least<br />

Establishing<br />

to those now paid to army recruits be available for those<br />

equivalent<br />

want to develop themselves through building men and societies.<br />

who<br />

program will not be as selective as the Peace Corps and VISTA now<br />

This<br />

in regard to skills, nor as restrictive as the Job Corps in terms<br />

are<br />

poverty-level background. Just as almost any male can expect to<br />

of<br />

accepted if he volunteers for the armed forces, almost any male or<br />

be<br />

should expect to be accepted for a job in some area of voluntary<br />

female<br />

service.<br />

this choice should be recommended to individuals<br />

Further,<br />

are searching for a way of finding their bearings. The opportunity<br />

who<br />

take part in developing an individual or small group of persons,<br />

to<br />

in that way to effect the course of the whole society, is a very<br />

and<br />

one. For those who wish it, voluntary service can provide the<br />

special<br />

opportunities for travel as does the armed forces at the present<br />

same<br />

time, as well as training in a skill which will later be marketable.<br />

anyone who presently sees the army as a growth experi-<br />

For<br />

this plan of voluntary service should be at least acceptable.<br />

ence<br />

many who do not accept the armed forces this plan should be a<br />

For<br />

one. It will expose young men and women to the exhilarating<br />

welcome<br />

that they can help others. This will presumably have a<br />

possibility<br />

more positive long-lasting effect on their lives than forced time<br />

far<br />

the armed forces. It will also help advance the society in general,<br />

in<br />

providing manpower for services which today are not provided.<br />

in<br />

people who volunteer for such a program should have<br />

Young<br />

major say in the area of their work. Some will prefer physical<br />

a<br />

others teaching, others desk positions with service agencies.<br />

labor,<br />

however, will undoubtedly choose to be involved in direct con-<br />

Some,<br />

tact with underprivileged or client populations.<br />

is at this.point that we in rehabilitation should become<br />

It<br />

As noted earlier, some individuals with what are now<br />

interested.<br />

minimal amounts of training have been shown to be effective<br />

considered<br />

counseling, and in other social service occupations. The plan out-<br />

in<br />

above will provide the manpower needed to service the programs<br />

lined<br />

we and our clients believe are needed. It will give us enough<br />

that<br />

to work with that the selection procedures which have been<br />

individuals<br />

can be used, and clients will be receiving the best services<br />

developed<br />

available for the taxpayers' dollar (Savino and Schlamp, 1968).<br />

program should also provide rehabilitation services<br />

This<br />

a base from which to develop further recruitment and training.<br />

with<br />

will be able to encourage those who are most effective to stay<br />

We<br />

us in regular staff positions after their voluntary service<br />

with<br />

is over, or to go to Universities or other training institutions<br />

period<br />

more advanced preparation. The program is dependant upon a re-<br />

for<br />

of the society to training individuals for service, rather<br />

commitment<br />

destruction. If America chooses growth and development within<br />

than<br />

21


outside our nation, vast amounts of money now spent on armaments<br />

and<br />

be reconverted. The large numbers of young men who are not doing<br />

must<br />

which provides goods will become more visible. Many of those<br />

work<br />

in the army, and many of those unemployed, will be engaged<br />

formerly<br />

service-type employment. In some areas they will be building roads<br />

in<br />

schools, and in others, tearing down roads and schools to lay out<br />

and<br />

More interesting to us in rehabilitation services, they will<br />

parks.<br />

the front-line of manpower to service those who need help.<br />

provide<br />

our country will allow for a period of voluntary service the money<br />

If<br />

be found to buy the services. The money is available, just as it<br />

can<br />

available for Vietnam. The real question is whether the people<br />

was<br />

America want it strongly enough. And it is the job of those of<br />

of<br />

in planning for further rehabilitation services to show that the<br />

us<br />

are great enough to call forth the willingness.<br />

needs<br />

22


References<br />

Albee, G.W. Models, myths, and manpower. Mental Hygiene, 1968, 52,<br />

i.<br />

168-180.<br />

Aspy, D. A study of three facilitative conditions and their<br />

2.<br />

to the achievement of third grade students.<br />

relationships<br />

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1965.<br />

Berenson, B.G. and Carkhuff, R.R. (Eds.) Sources of gain in coun-<br />

3.<br />

$ an__d psychoth_erapy. New York: Holt, 1967.<br />

selin<br />

James, W. The moral equivalent of war. Popular Science Monthl X,<br />

4.<br />

7--7, 400-412.<br />

1910,<br />

Pearl, A. and Riessman, F. Ne__w Creers for th__e o: the nonpro-<br />

5.<br />

in human service. New York: Free Press, 1965.<br />

fessional<br />

Rogers, C.R. Client-centered therapy. Boston: Hougton-Mifflin,<br />

6.<br />

1951.<br />

Savino, M.T. and Schlamp, F.T. The use of nonprofessional rehabili-<br />

7.<br />

aides in decreasing re-hospitalization. Journal of reha-<br />

tation<br />

bilitation, 1968, 3--4, 28-31.<br />

Shapiro, J.G. Therapeutic conditions beyond the psychotherapy<br />

8.<br />

Arkansas Rehabilitation Research and Training<br />

encounter.<br />

Center Discussion Papers, Vol. I, No. 8, 1967.<br />

Truax, C.B. Effective ingredients in psychotherapy: An approach<br />

9.<br />

unraveling the patient-therapist interaction. Journal of<br />

to<br />

Counselin$ .Psychology, 1963, IO, 256-263.<br />

Truax, C.B. The use of supportive personnel in rehabilitation<br />

i0.<br />

Process and outcome. In G.R. Leslie (Edo),<br />

counseling:<br />

personnel i__nrehabilitation centers. Washington, D.C.:<br />

Supportive<br />

of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1967.<br />

Department<br />

Truax, C.B., and Carkhuff, R.R. Toward effective counselin$ an__d<br />

ii.<br />

Chicago: Aldine, 1967.<br />

psychotherapy.<br />

23


PLANNING FOR REHABILITATION AND COMMUNITY ACTION<br />

A. Renzaglia, Ph.D.<br />

Guy<br />

and Director, Rehabilitation Institute<br />

Professor<br />

Illinois University<br />

Southern<br />

Illinois<br />

Carbondale,<br />

eloquence of our previous speakers in presenting the<br />

The<br />

and extent of comprehensive planning for psychological services<br />

need<br />

rehabilitation centers and by professional associations leaves me<br />

in<br />

bit uncertain (even apprehensive) about the significance of my topic--<br />

a<br />

observations on rehabilitation psychology and community programs.<br />

some<br />

are being written on the need and significance of state and<br />

Volumes<br />

planning for health and welfare service; directives and memos<br />

national<br />

out glowingly the importance of comprehensive health facilities<br />

spell<br />

multi-service centers; and committees of all kinds are being<br />

and/or<br />

to represent communities, districts, regions, states, and so<br />

formed<br />

Chances are that what I have to say is in most part a reply of<br />

on.<br />

many utterances, borrowed from here and there, and perhaps even<br />

these<br />

to many of you. Yet, planning for comprehensive statewide<br />

boring<br />

is a reality and it behooves us as rehabilitation psycholo-<br />

services<br />

and counselors to consider seriously our role and possible<br />

gists<br />

in this movement.<br />

impact<br />

An Aroused Psychology<br />

trust you have noticed with me the emphasis at this APA<br />

I<br />

on social service and social responsibility. At every<br />

Convention<br />

I attended so far, speakers have chided APA members for fail-<br />

session<br />

to become significant forces in social planning and in action<br />

ing<br />

Leaflets have been circularized in many meeting places<br />

programs.<br />

the membership to attend an informal discussion group, whose<br />

urging<br />

mind you, is to make "psychology more socially relevant."<br />

objective,<br />

a far cry from the conventions of former years. Then the voices<br />

What<br />

the socially and community oriented psychologists were a small din<br />

of<br />

a larger roar and only a few rallied to the cause. Now there is<br />

in<br />

obvious sense of urgency, an optimism or belief that psychologists<br />

an<br />

have something concretely to offer, and, more so, that we have a<br />

do<br />

of moral responsibility to take action. No longer can we pretend<br />

kind<br />

psychologists have no stake in what occurs in life's arenas, nor<br />

that<br />

we hide behind the notion that social planning is outside the pale<br />

can<br />

psychology, and that rightfully such is the responsibility of poli-<br />

of<br />

jurists, religionists, moralists and the like. The force<br />

ticians,<br />

this movement has generated in the recent past and now is to me<br />

that<br />

most encouraging.<br />

24


course, rehabilitation psychologists and counselors<br />

Of<br />

take a measure of pride in this recent emphasis, since they<br />

should<br />

long advocated socially relevant activities on the part of their<br />

have<br />

For some time now they, with other community psychologists,<br />

members.<br />

argued for a conitment to and involvement in community, state,<br />

have<br />

national socio-economic problems. This some have done through<br />

and<br />

training programs (witness the increasing number of courses in<br />

their<br />

psychology, community resources, and community development<br />

community<br />

in such programs), involvement in social planning, and assistance<br />

now<br />

the development of community-based programs of all kinds. It is<br />

in<br />

obvious that psychologists (as our previous speakers have pointed<br />

now<br />

must be involved in planning of comprehensive community services<br />

out)<br />

all levels of organization and locale. Certainly we have a lot to<br />

at<br />

about the prevention, management and control of social and human<br />

say<br />

and it is equally clear that psychologists through their<br />

difficulties,<br />

and organizations can help train or provide the manpower for<br />

influence<br />

these burgeoning services.<br />

spport Personnel<br />

corollary and even more recent concern has been (and is)<br />

A<br />

matter of support personnel in the helping profession. Our next<br />

the<br />

Dr. J. G. Shapiro, will present some clear evidence that<br />

speaker,<br />

aides can be trained successfully as agents of change, and there<br />

these<br />

ways to identify those most likely to succeed. In any event, it<br />

are<br />

gratifying to note the many programs at this convention at which<br />

is<br />

are exhorting psychologists to become a part of this enter-<br />

speakers<br />

Some universities are responding to this demand for personnel<br />

prise.<br />

welfare and rehabilitation agencies, others are playing a more<br />

from<br />

game of "wait and see," while the more traditional are<br />

cautious<br />

in their refusal to venture in training for new careers.<br />

adamant<br />

(1968) recently advanced some cogent arguments for university<br />

Adams<br />

and commitment to training undergraduates for the help-<br />

participation<br />

services: "Undergraduate education in the helping services, if<br />

ing<br />

and broadly conceived and planned, can be the finest study<br />

properly<br />

the humanities." And he goes on to say that "such an education<br />

of<br />

not take away from the liberal arts curriculum but makes a sub-<br />

does<br />

addition." He sees such training as "exciting," "vital,"<br />

stantial<br />

and "innovating" a challenge to higher education<br />

"creative,"<br />

I share his enthusiasm.<br />

and<br />

here are some encouraging signs that there is an awaken-<br />

So<br />

a powerful urge to embroil psychology and its resources in the<br />

ing,<br />

of rehabilitation, welfare, corrections, and other social<br />

arenas<br />

It is now encumbent on us to reflect on the multifarious<br />

services.<br />

that psychologists can make an impact on social problems and<br />

ways<br />

make our voices heard in statewide planning units. The<br />

vigorously<br />

given to every state to develop a comprehensive plan of voca-<br />

charge<br />

rehabilitation, for instance, whereby all handicapped people<br />

tional<br />

be serviced by July of 1975, is both an awesome prospect and<br />

will<br />

It is in this respect that my remarks will be limited<br />

exciting.<br />

25


viable and powerful force behind (and integral to) compre-<br />

today--a<br />

rehabilitation in its mission to activate and service commun-<br />

hensive<br />

ities.<br />

Need for Planning and Action<br />

from the clear recognition by all responsible profes-<br />

Aside<br />

and agencies that the number of individuals who become handi-<br />

sionals<br />

yearly outstrip the number being rehabilitated, and the fact<br />

capped<br />

there is now quite a backlog of handicapped people needing rehab-<br />

that<br />

services, a number of other imminent factors dictate immed-<br />

ilitation<br />

planning (as it does the reshuffling of resources) if the dream<br />

iate<br />

rehabilitation (and comprehensive community services) is to become<br />

for<br />

reality. Some of these are:<br />

a<br />

an alarming proliferation of agencies now involved in<br />

i.<br />

vocational rehabilitation services to the<br />

providing<br />

handicapped;<br />

the inclusion of socially-culturally disadvantaged<br />

2.<br />

disenchanted) as appropriate clientele for<br />

(and<br />

vocational rehabilitation agencies;<br />

recent ammendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

3.<br />

which broadens the responsibilities of divisions<br />

Act<br />

of vocational rehabilitation; namely,<br />

assessment and evaluation of poverty groups<br />

a.<br />

service;<br />

for<br />

early identification of handicapped conditions<br />

b.<br />

more extensive service to the teenaged<br />

and<br />

and<br />

handicapped;<br />

the obvious trend toward providing services to<br />

c.<br />

of the handicapped and even to living<br />

families<br />

in which handicapping conditions prevail;<br />

units<br />

the corollary movement of planning statewide health and<br />

4.<br />

services in such departments as public health<br />

restoration<br />

and mental health.<br />

a member of the State Board of Vocational Education and<br />

As<br />

in Illinois, I have become acutely aware of the number<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

private and governmental agencies that are now engaged in providing<br />

of<br />

rehabilitation services to the handicapped, more so than<br />

vocational<br />

visible to many of us even where the action is. Excluding private<br />

is<br />

at least eight governmental agencies in Illinois provide<br />

agencies,<br />

to the handicapped, all of which were traditionally subsumed<br />

services<br />

DVR agencies, or at least these functions were assigned by execu-<br />

in<br />

order as their responsibility. An array of fragmented services<br />

tive<br />

being provided by such agencies as the Department of Labor, Public<br />

are<br />

Assistance, Public Instruction, Children and Family Services, Mental<br />

26


Office of Economic Opportunity Action Programs, Housing and<br />

llealth,<br />

Development, and now the Model Cities Programs. Some of these<br />

Urban<br />

are developing rather comprehensive services and acquiring<br />

agencies<br />

with the expertise to do so; others have only ventured into<br />

personnel<br />

areas of rehabilitation, but zealously and with powerful<br />

certain<br />

at their command. While this proliferation speaks positively<br />

resources<br />

the increased awareness of the need for and acceptance of the rehab-<br />

of<br />

process, coordination has been lacking and overlap and ill-<br />

ilitation<br />

responsibilities prevail. Many have lamented this topsy-<br />

defined<br />

development of rehabilitation in the states and voices have been<br />

turvy<br />

urging a more coordinated and concerted effort. Byproducts of<br />

raised<br />

fragmentation seem to be duplication of services, unclear bound-<br />

this<br />

of responsibilities, concentration in certain areas and neglect<br />

aries<br />

others, vying for clients, shunting of clients from one agency to<br />

of<br />

andeven inefficiency in operations. Obviously, the answer<br />

another,<br />

lie in augmenting nor perpetuating the present situation, and<br />

doesn't<br />

as a member of the rehabilitation team, should also<br />

psychologists,<br />

their voices to push for coordination of some sort.<br />

raise<br />

Some Positive Si$.ns<br />

the above commentaries on the frationated nature of<br />

While<br />

in most stages is rather pessimistic, I do want to<br />

rehabilitation<br />

also the many concerted movements now in force that may well<br />

recognize<br />

precursors to an over-all coordinated scheme.<br />

be<br />

The Rehabilitation Services Administration (previously<br />

i.<br />

Rehabilitation Administration) and their state<br />

Vocational<br />

have long advocated cooperative efforts<br />

counterparts<br />

state agencies. Witness the excellent work now<br />

between<br />

done in cooperative programs between the Division<br />

being<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation and public schools, correctional<br />

of<br />

and units, mental hospitals, community action<br />

facilities<br />

special schools, workshops and similar. Amazing<br />

programs,<br />

in rehabilitating hitherto difficult populations<br />

studies<br />

handicapped people have been reported.<br />

of<br />

The recent reorganization in the Department of Health,<br />

2.<br />

and Welfare leading to the creation of the<br />

Education<br />

and Rehabilitation Service also attests to the<br />

Social<br />

conclusion that more efficient and effective<br />

inescapable<br />

for the handicapped is likely to be achieved<br />

service<br />

coordination of social and rehabilitation services.<br />

through<br />

too numerous to mention and somewhat isolated attempts<br />

These<br />

cooperation between service agencies are visible signs of an even<br />

at<br />

movement--a concerted drive to comprehensive and coordinated<br />

greater<br />

for the handicapped citizen.<br />

services<br />

27


acceptance of many socially and cultural handicapped by<br />

The<br />

for service is certainly one of the most forward steps taken in<br />

DVRs<br />

war on poverty; yet it is a tremendouly ambitious obligation to<br />

the<br />

Apparently, vocational rehabilitation agencies were given<br />

assume.<br />

awesome task in recognition of the manner and effectiveness with<br />

this<br />

they dispatched their services to the physically,mentally, and<br />

which<br />

handicapped. And they have indeed demonstrated over the<br />

emotionally<br />

the soundness of their process for rehabilitating the handicapped;<br />

years<br />

also had a cadre of personnel to match. Since the mission before<br />

they<br />

is staggering, they need whatever support and leadership psycholo-<br />

them<br />

can give, but active participation is necessary. Immediately,<br />

gists<br />

agencies need help in defining the population to receive service, and<br />

VR<br />

extent of their services; in recruiting sufficient subprofessionals<br />

the<br />

man their units; a source of consultants, determining methods of<br />

to<br />

this population; establishment of community-based units,<br />

reaching<br />

approaches; and on sundry other issues. It saddens me,<br />

motivational<br />

one, to hear VR administrators wail, "How can we possibly serve<br />

for<br />

those people?"<br />

all<br />

added function of DVRs and a timely one, is that of<br />

Another<br />

and evaluating for service and referral the unemployed-<br />

processing<br />

populations. Once again VR agencies have been singled<br />

underemployed<br />

as th__e units most prepared and knowledgeable to take on this basic,<br />

out<br />

service. Let yourself conceive for a moment<br />

first-step-in-the-process<br />

implications and extensiveness of this charge, and I suspect you,<br />

the<br />

DVR personnel, will also cringe with the enormity of it. Need-<br />

like<br />

to say, DVRs need encouragement and help of all kinds, perhaps<br />

less<br />

in obtaining trained assessors and evaluators, and psychology must<br />

most<br />

to their needs. This is another sign of the times making it<br />

respond<br />

that departments of psychology and professional psychologists<br />

imperative<br />

aside their pretentious notions and arguments over the merits of<br />

put<br />

versus applied, professionals and/or subprofessionals,<br />

experimental<br />

then truly turn over their resources to training well-qualified<br />

and<br />

assessors and support personnel.<br />

the 1967 National Rehabilitation Association Conference,<br />

In<br />

then Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, John W. Gardner,<br />

the<br />

some of the promises for rehabilitation that were likely to<br />

described<br />

from the reorganization of the Department. Foremost among<br />

accrue<br />

welcome, yet seemingly beyond the scope of present resources,<br />

these<br />

the following possibilities:<br />

are<br />

i. Special services for children and youth;<br />

Provisions for the early identification of handicapping<br />

2.<br />

and<br />

conditions;<br />

3. More and better services for the teenage handicapped.<br />

28


he proposed that the rehabilitation community<br />

Further,<br />

more of its thinking to the family. He said,<br />

direct<br />

we were to improve the conditions in which a handi-<br />

If<br />

person lives, we should be addressing ourselves<br />

capped<br />

his entire family unit, and even to environmental<br />

to<br />

that extend beyond the family. Those of<br />

circumstances<br />

who have been working with juvenile delinquents<br />

you<br />

how important those circumstances can be. The<br />

know<br />

environment represents stability and inspiration<br />

home<br />

some, a place of conflict and frustration for<br />

for<br />

and for some, of course, home or family life<br />

others,<br />

non-existent.<br />

are<br />

this proposal, we can visualize different activities<br />

From<br />

the field or district worker. Somehow he must become less<br />

for<br />

Somehow he will come to give heavy attention to the<br />

office-bound.<br />

that sustain the disability and that mitigate against<br />

conditions<br />

change for the client. Another brief quote from<br />

effective<br />

Gardner's speech:<br />

Mr.<br />

our approach is family centered, and if it takes<br />

If<br />

account the environment in which rehabilitation<br />

into<br />

occur, we may be more successful in rehabili-<br />

must<br />

th handicapped person himself; we may help<br />

tating<br />

disorganized and distraught families into<br />

transform<br />

of strength and purpose; and we may succeed in<br />

units<br />

the foundation for a stronger and sounder<br />

building<br />

order.<br />

social<br />

here we have a global perspective of service for the<br />

So<br />

from prevention to fulfillment, and a promise of such<br />

handicapped,<br />

available to those virtually out of the cradle and before the<br />

being<br />

What more can the behavioral scientist and practitioner ask<br />

grave.<br />

For who among us has not speculated on what could be done in<br />

for?<br />

society with a comprehensive charge and plan of service, massive<br />

our<br />

in the social milieu, to head off deprivation, misery,<br />

intervention<br />

human waste. Urgently needed is an over-all approach for each<br />

and<br />

framed by social and behavioral scientists, community repre-<br />

state<br />

legislators, and the many other involved parties, as<br />

sentatives,<br />

well as the financial and personnel resources to launch it.<br />

Who's Plannin$<br />

planning for comprehensive health and welfare is<br />

Statewide<br />

a concern of other than the state vocational rehabilitation<br />

also<br />

In Illinois, for instance, the Department of Mental<br />

departments.<br />

supported by a planning grant, embarked on such a plan,<br />

Health<br />

prodded by the comprehensive Mental Health Centers Act<br />

undoubtedly<br />

1963 and its amendments. To complicate matters even further, the<br />

of<br />

Department of Public Health has recently been designated by<br />

Illinois<br />

Governor, at the request of the Department of Health, Education,<br />

the<br />

Welfare, as the agency responsible for over-all health planning<br />

and<br />

the state. Purportedly, the latter would subsume in its plan<br />

in<br />

29


more restricted plans of other health management and treatment<br />

the<br />

Mental Health, Vocational Rehabilitation, Children<br />

agencies--i.e.,<br />

Family Services, Division of Alcoholism Commission, Narcotics<br />

and<br />

Addictive Drugs, and similar agencies. All efforts are now in<br />

and<br />

initial stages (formulation of numerous committees, assessment<br />

the<br />

present status and services, and formulating a pla of attack),<br />

of<br />

one must pause to consider the many difficulties, complications<br />

but<br />

responsibilities thrust on the backs of these planners. Should<br />

and<br />

agency develop their own plan? It makes a good deal of sense.<br />

each<br />

will each be integrated into an over-all plan without slighting<br />

How<br />

or the other Who will be responsible for eventually coordinat-<br />

one<br />

such an all-embracing proposal? Will psychologists make them-<br />

ing<br />

heard? Quite clearly they have a tremendous stake in the final<br />

selves<br />

to the future of health management, treatment and<br />

product--guidelines<br />

enhancement.<br />

A Be$innin $<br />

have managed to touch only briefly on a number of crucial<br />

I<br />

that confront rehabilitation generally and of course psycholo-<br />

issues<br />

in rehabilitation, in particular, since they are directly<br />

gists<br />

So far I have pointed out that the issues of our times and<br />

involved.<br />

movements being launched by state and federal agencies make it<br />

the<br />

that rehabilitation psychologists and counselors take an<br />

imperative<br />

role in rehabilitation planning and action programs; that full<br />

active<br />

of psychology's potential and future course is now at<br />

realization<br />

stake; and that we are welcomed and needed as partners in planning.<br />

then is a partial solution, a first step, to resolve<br />

What<br />

lack of concerted effort or, positively, to weld the rehabilita-<br />

the<br />

movement into a comprehensive community force? In this respect,<br />

tion<br />

National Citizens Advisory Committee on Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

the<br />

has submitted a list of recommendations to the Secretary of<br />

(1968)<br />

Education, and Welfare that are quite far-reaching in scope,<br />

Health,<br />

as a group they certainly underscore (if not outrightly so, then<br />

and<br />

design) the need for careful planning and coordination of all<br />

by<br />

Like the Advisory Committee, I am deeply convinced and<br />

resources.<br />

on the merits of "decentralization and dispersal" of rehabilita-<br />

sold<br />

offices "in major population centers to provide services in<br />

tion<br />

wNere disabled people live." The practice of locating<br />

neighborhoods<br />

in downtown and plush areas of the community, estranged from<br />

offices<br />

target areas in which handicapping conditions are prevalent,<br />

the<br />

should be relegated to the past only.<br />

recommendations that particularly stood out for me and<br />

The<br />

to which I want to react are contained in the following quote:<br />

and<br />

by vocational rehabilitation agencies of<br />

Establishment<br />

multiservice centers in ghettos and other<br />

one-stop,<br />

areas where the incidence of disability is high."<br />

30


suspect this has become a deeply assimilated and etched dream of<br />

I<br />

which I cherish for rehabilitation, for as a member of the Youth<br />

mine<br />

Center Study Group some five years ago I became indelibly<br />

Opportunity<br />

with the notion and merits of comprehensive, neighborhood<br />

impressed<br />

It was clear then, as it is now, that total services had to<br />

centers.<br />

brought to the neighborhoods where the "action is," and that some<br />

be<br />

indigenous to these areas could be trained and employed to<br />

leaders<br />

man these centers.<br />

help<br />

Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center.s<br />

We Are Over the past five years, experiences with multi-<br />

Where<br />

centers such as Youth Opportunity Centers, Gateway Centers,<br />

purpose<br />

Centers, Concentrated Employment Centers, Comprehensive<br />

Neighborhood<br />

Health Centers and the like have contributed much to our under-<br />

Mental<br />

of the do's and don'ts of community-based services. In many<br />

standing<br />

these experiences have heightened the issues and controversies,<br />

ways<br />

even more to the confusion. There is still no agreement on how<br />

adding<br />

the centers should be nor how they should be organized,<br />

comprehensive<br />

and services dispensed. Should we push for what is a prevalent<br />

manned,<br />

valued concept today, the idea of "community-based service"? Some<br />

and<br />

to argue that the community must be permitted to take over<br />

continue<br />

operate such centers, particularly in ghetto areas, but who is to<br />

and<br />

organize, train and finance these community forces? Most, of<br />

arouse,<br />

cherish this dream of "a community activated and organized to<br />

course,<br />

its own problems" concept, rightfully assuming that such a<br />

handle<br />

would thereby be psychologically prepared and resourcefully<br />

community<br />

mobilized to prevent, treat and rehabilitate its human casualties.<br />

are less optimistic that communities will ever become<br />

Others<br />

involved, and they are accepting a modified plan of community parti-<br />

so<br />

The latter group shares the rationale for community involve-<br />

cipation.<br />

and participation but in cooperation with and under the leadership<br />

ment<br />

an established and on-going agency or agencies. Even when the<br />

of<br />

plan and organize their own services, they argue, the<br />

communities<br />

(clients) will soon perceive them in a manner similar to<br />

consumers<br />

services the establishment, or as an "agency umbrella."<br />

agency<br />

so they feel that community operated and sponsored services of<br />

More<br />

kind are subject more to petty jealousies and interest groups<br />

this<br />

are the"freer" state agencies. Too many have witnessed the<br />

than<br />

among factions in the community for power in these community<br />

struggle<br />

programs, and the unfortunate consequences; some have also been<br />

action<br />

over noting the ease with which the executive directors have<br />

soured<br />

these centers in their own limited images often at the<br />

perpetuated<br />

of the community.<br />

expense<br />

have experiences with state-federally (agency) sponsored<br />

Nor<br />

been too refreshing or innovating. The hopes and dreams of<br />

centers<br />

Opportunity Centers, as a comprehensive and innovating service<br />

Youth<br />

unemployed and under-employed youth, were never realized in many<br />

for<br />

communities. Admittedly, they did bring somewhat together an array<br />

31


specialized services for youth, but in the main they were fashioned<br />

of<br />

existing state employment services. Some attribute this to the<br />

after<br />

that the personnel and leadership manning these centers were<br />

fact<br />

primarily from existing emplo[ent centers, and because of<br />

recruited<br />

experience, they tended to fashion youth opportunity centers in<br />

their<br />

with these experiences. It must be recognized, of course,<br />

accordance<br />

was and is a shortage ¢ competent personnel, an it may well be<br />

there<br />

youth opportunity cente. ,ere prematurely opened. Perhaps it<br />

that<br />

have been sounder to dela the opening of such centers until a<br />

may<br />

of personnel were recruited and trained to implement the intent<br />

pool<br />

the movement. To add to that, if the cooperation of universities,<br />

of<br />

psychologists in particular, had been sought or volunteered to<br />

and<br />

prepare these personnel, perhaps the results would have been different.<br />

Illinois, the Department of Mental Health has taken the<br />

In<br />

in establishing community=based centers .hrough their zone<br />

leadership<br />

Some centers are raher comprehensive, embracing many<br />

programs.<br />

ordinarily the responsibility of oher agencies (such as<br />

services<br />

rehabilitation, employment services, etc.), and some are<br />

vocational<br />

limited. Many are at a disadvantage because they have not<br />

rather<br />

involved the community, and others have trouble getting<br />

adequately<br />

and service from other state agencies. Patients are still<br />

cooperation<br />

around from center to agency for services, but at least services<br />

shunted<br />

been brought to the community itself--not isolated from it. New<br />

have<br />

and many other states have done likewise. Missouri, on the other<br />

York<br />

has concentrated on community action programs (human development<br />

hand,<br />

gateway projects) and programs sponsored by the labor department<br />

and<br />

employment programs). Here in California a number of<br />

(concentrated<br />

rehabilitation or service centers have been formed, I<br />

comprehensive<br />

Some are still flourishing, while others have dissolved<br />

understand.<br />

for want of coordination and support.<br />

to me in all of these experiences with community<br />

Distressing<br />

centers was and is the obvious lack of interest and involvement<br />

service<br />

psychologists as a whole whether in universities or in the field.<br />

by<br />

all the behavioral scientists, the psychologists should be deeply<br />

Of<br />

and most willing to invest their resources in the future of<br />

supportive<br />

movement. Another disquieting feature of these efforts has been<br />

this<br />

extent to which vocational rehabilitation agencies are letting<br />

the<br />

be pre-empted by other agencies. VR agencies are seemingly<br />

themselves<br />

their responsibilities for services and by default, others<br />

abdicating<br />

taking over. In any event, it is quite clear even from this<br />

are<br />

and fragmented review that planning is essential to success,<br />

sketchy<br />

unless all are involved and soon, we may witness even more confu-<br />

and<br />

sion as time goes on.<br />

Considerations While I am still deeply committed to the<br />

Some<br />

of Community Rehabilitation Centers, in which multiple<br />

establishment<br />

(now provided in many areas by various agencies) be made<br />

services<br />

to clients as soon after initial contact as possible, I am<br />

available<br />

at all certain just how to proceed. Experiences as previously<br />

not<br />

out, have not clearly marked the path to follow what worked<br />

pointed<br />

32


one locale, didn't in another; programs for the black ghetto areas<br />

in<br />

to call for a different pattern of organization and control of<br />

seem<br />

than for white target areas; and centers for urban areas<br />

programs<br />

may be quite different from those established for less popu-<br />

generally<br />

areas. Perhaps all that can be done now is to continue raising<br />

lated<br />

issues and once considered, proceed in a tentative and experi-<br />

relevant<br />

fashion, always prepared to modify practices as experiences<br />

ential<br />

Some considerations follow:<br />

dictate.<br />

An experienced colleague of mine reiterates strongly<br />

i.<br />

position of considering this whole movement experi-<br />

the<br />

approach it openly, free of stron involvement;<br />

mentally;<br />

it out for six months or a year; evaluate the proce-<br />

try<br />

reaction and results; alter as necessary and<br />

dures,<br />

redesigning per subsequent conclusions. I trust<br />

continue<br />

it is possible to initiate these programs in a spirit<br />

that<br />

openness, no strong a priori biases, clearly from a<br />

of<br />

assuming that answers (especially general ones)<br />

position<br />

still unknown, and that we must be flexible enough<br />

are<br />

discover what works in each locale. You may, of<br />

to<br />

recognize that this approach is neither new nor<br />

course,<br />

does it insure success.<br />

Careful consideration should be given to the organiza-<br />

2.<br />

and control patterns of these comprehensive<br />

tional<br />

centers. In one part of the Advisory<br />

rehabilitation<br />

report they advocate that VR agencies<br />

Committee's<br />

such centers, while in another they recom-<br />

"establish"<br />

that VR agencies "take the initiative to establish"<br />

mend<br />

in appropriate areas. Implicit in the latter<br />

these<br />

are patterns of organization and control<br />

recommendations<br />

different from that implied in the former. Yet, if<br />

quite<br />

of comprehensive services to areas is to<br />

coordination<br />

a reality, somehow the resources and services of<br />

become<br />

health, welfare and education agencies should<br />

pertinent<br />

combined with those in the community and be made<br />

be<br />

available at the center to area residents. How<br />

directly<br />

may become a reality is still uncertain. Some VR<br />

this<br />

have proposed an informal arrangement (Allied<br />

agencies<br />

Council) in consort with many other state agencies;<br />

Agency<br />

have or are preparing and establishing such centers<br />

others<br />

their own and then inviting other services to join<br />

on<br />

Recently, following along with the intent of the<br />

them.<br />

in HEW, some states are considering legislation<br />

.changes<br />

a means of effecting coordination. Certain legislative<br />

as<br />

in Illinois, for instance, are pushing for a "super"<br />

leaders<br />

and welfare agency, under which such centers would<br />

health<br />

coordinated. It may well be that some mandate is neces-<br />

be<br />

to bring about this end. Other factors to consider<br />

sary<br />

in the organizational and control pattern are:<br />

33


Leadership in initiating the above may well be the<br />

a.<br />

of VR agencies;<br />

responsibility<br />

How to involve the community throughout the planning,<br />

b.<br />

and control phases;<br />

formulation<br />

Whether these centers should attempt to service large<br />

c.<br />

areas or whether small neighborhood centers should<br />

urban<br />

My personal predilection is for a large,<br />

prevail.<br />

facility in the heart of a needful urban area<br />

central<br />

responsibility is to coordinate and provide both<br />

whose<br />

and backup support to smaller neighborhood<br />

services<br />

Funding of these centers should be independ-<br />

centers.<br />

of the whims or peculiar status of any one agency.<br />

ent<br />

this respect, while I suspect my point of view isn't<br />

In<br />

popular, I would like to see developed a thoughtful<br />

too<br />

whereby sufficient funds are allocated for each<br />

plan<br />

area sucnt to provide thorough and compre-<br />

major<br />

rehabilitation services to its handicapped. It<br />

hensive<br />

be the responsibility of the central, coordinating<br />

would<br />

then to allocate funds for neighborhood projects<br />

facility<br />

centers based on immediate needs.<br />

and<br />

I suspect that little objection would be voiced if these<br />

d.<br />

(central) rehabilitation centers were<br />

comprehensive<br />

agency control as long as community involvement<br />

under<br />

more pronounced in the neighborhood centers. In<br />

was<br />

one of the functions of these central facilities<br />

fact,<br />

be to encourage urban tracts or neighborhoods to<br />

could<br />

action and establish programs designed to meet<br />

take<br />

specific needs and under their direction. These<br />

their<br />

centers could provide direction, consultation,<br />

central<br />

necessary funding to implement and sustain action<br />

the<br />

in the neighborhoods.<br />

A network of comprehensive service to a large urban<br />

e.<br />

includes then a large central facility under state<br />

area<br />

and smaller neighborhood centers coordinated<br />

control<br />

the center but under local control. As the<br />

through<br />

needs consultative, perhaps mobile, coordinating<br />

center<br />

so too should the local units provide outposted<br />

teams,<br />

to work right in the heart of neighborhoods.<br />

personnel<br />

the dream of making a significant impact on conditions<br />

If<br />

to and maintaining disability, deprivation and<br />

leading<br />

is to materialize, then provisions must be<br />

alienation<br />

to intervene where it counts in the home and<br />

made<br />

and in the community in which these conditions<br />

family<br />

Needed are community workers and planners,<br />

thrive.<br />

aides, neighborhood social workers and<br />

rehabilitation<br />

who not only work with (and refer) the handi-<br />

similar<br />

individuals, but who help mobilize and organize<br />

capped<br />

34


Who is to administer and supervise these larger centers as<br />

4.<br />

as coordinate the efforts of neighborhood and urban<br />

well<br />

Should it be an existing agency or one newly<br />

tracts?<br />

for that purpose? It must be pointed out that even<br />

created<br />

the advent of a super or general welfare agency in<br />

with<br />

the experiences and successes of VR agencies perforce<br />

states,<br />

consideration. Why not propose that VR agencies<br />

deserves<br />

the leadership and organize it along the lines that<br />

assume<br />

proven to be successful? Here is an agency that has<br />

have<br />

over the years a sound working philosophy, an<br />

demonstrated<br />

network of field work activities, a valid method<br />

established<br />

case management, and most of all, they now possess a<br />

of<br />

of professionals for supervisory and consultative<br />

supply<br />

Since the focal point of these centers is rehabili-<br />

purposes.<br />

the agency responsible for vocational rehabilitation<br />

tation,<br />

the logical choice. Any other choice would be at variance<br />

is<br />

existing practice and the intended purposes of the<br />

with<br />

of "comprehensive rehabilitation."<br />

concept<br />

of Universities Universities have an obvious and impor-<br />

Role<br />

part to play in this movement and it is imperative that they<br />

tant<br />

the bold steps consonant with this social action philosophy. The<br />

take<br />

of the battles in the academic family should be borne immediately<br />

brunt<br />

those involved in rehabilitation psychology and in rehabilitation<br />

by<br />

and perhaps by example, we may attract other social and<br />

counseling<br />

scientists into the action arena. What then are some courses<br />

behavioral<br />

action?<br />

of<br />

It is time we accepted more often (yes, even ferret out)<br />

i.<br />

to become members of planning and implementa-<br />

invitations<br />

groups. We should welcome and participate vigorously<br />

tion<br />

groups planning for comprehensive rehabilitation and<br />

in<br />

action, dare to speak out in support of progres-<br />

community<br />

movements and less and less be content with sitting<br />

sive<br />

in some kind of pompous judgment of those who confront<br />

back<br />

issues.<br />

reality<br />

I would even encourage that we move to cross-appoint staff<br />

2,<br />

action programs of various kinds shared staff.<br />

with<br />

close ties and channels for mutual feedback would<br />

The<br />

in many ways our training and research potential.<br />

enhance<br />

There should be no longer any qualms about training support<br />

3.<br />

in rehabilitation, and with the tie-in mentioned<br />

personnel<br />

most could be trained realistically in the field.<br />

above,<br />

supporting staff as rehabilitationaides, community<br />

Such<br />

evaluation aides, therapy aides, administrative<br />

workers,<br />

behavioral technicians, and others like them are<br />

aides,<br />

much sought personnel today.<br />

35


Professional programs for psychologists, counselors,<br />

4.<br />

etc. should be reassessed and revised to<br />

evaluators,<br />

reflect the changing emphases in the helping professions.<br />

New degree programs should be inaugurated in the Associate<br />

5.<br />

Arts degree (such as aides and technicians), Bachelor's<br />

of<br />

administrators, workshop supervisors, pro-<br />

(institutional<br />

etc.) and in graduate programs to meet new career<br />

grammers,<br />

demands.<br />

Active participation in continuous training programs for<br />

6.<br />

staff is another way in which universities can<br />

agency<br />

their resources and knowledge felt. Along this same<br />

make<br />

I am a firm believer that we educators and trainers<br />

line,<br />

the helping professions should be continuously involved<br />

in<br />

some measure of service, whether in a campus unit or in<br />

in<br />

outside agency, to keep current with existing practices<br />

an<br />

reality.<br />

and<br />

7. Then, of course, we<br />

shouldn't forget evaluation and research;<br />

is in this domain that our special forte lies, and it<br />

it<br />

be unfortunate if we ever defaulted in this responsi-<br />

would<br />

As suggested, these comprehensive centers need to<br />

bility.<br />

established on an experimental base and data has to be<br />

be<br />

and interpreted into new procedures. This is<br />

accumulated<br />

university personnel can be of real service. More-<br />

where<br />

these centers will most likely provide an excellent<br />

over,<br />

for field research of all kinds opportunities<br />

laboratory<br />

for graduate trainees and staff members alike.<br />

retrospect, I seem to have wandered considerably, factual<br />

In<br />

some sections, exhortive in others. Yet, perhaps to the reader it<br />

in<br />

quite obvious that I am indeed a biased presenter, for I am and<br />

is<br />

long advocated that if psychology (and counseling) is to reach<br />

have<br />

mature and valid base for existence, it must become a vital force<br />

a<br />

social planning and action. While not all my colleagues would so<br />

in<br />

I am heartened by the signs in the profession as a whole. So<br />

agree,<br />

am I an adherent of functional training programs in universities,<br />

too<br />

designed.to meet the demands of socio-economic living-working<br />

programs<br />

and test of the worth of higher education may well be the<br />

units,<br />

facility with which they can tool up to society's demands.<br />

in rehabilitation work should not be afraid to speak out,<br />

We<br />

with reservation and caution. While it may be not only bold<br />

albeit<br />

presumptious of me to speak out on a main social issue that con-<br />

but<br />

us now (the concept of comprehensive rehabilitation centers),<br />

fronts<br />

did stick my neck out. I'm not sure anything was resolved, but I<br />

I<br />

there was some germane issue to consider in planning this venture.<br />

trust<br />

may all boil down to nothing more than "nothing is certain now,<br />

It<br />

let's get about it."<br />

but<br />

36


Desisnated Organization<br />

CHAPTER III<br />

THE PLANNING ORGANIZATION<br />

designated organization for the planning project was<br />

The<br />

Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

the<br />

of 15 members. The grant application provided for their<br />

comprised<br />

as follows:<br />

appointment<br />

One member from the office of the Governor;<br />

member of the House of Representatives selected by<br />

One<br />

Speaker of the House of Representatives;<br />

the<br />

member of the House of Representatives selected by<br />

One<br />

Minority Leader of the House of Representatives;<br />

the<br />

member of the Senate selected by the MajoritY Leader<br />

One<br />

the Senate;<br />

of<br />

member of the Senate selected by the Minority Leader<br />

One<br />

the Senate:<br />

of<br />

members selected by the Governor representing a broad<br />

Ten<br />

area of concern in the field of vocational re-<br />

statewide<br />

In addition to members representing the<br />

habilitation.<br />

members should be selected from the following<br />

public,<br />

labor., commerce and industry, education, vocational<br />

fields:<br />

medicine, services for the blind, private<br />

rehabilitation,<br />

aiding the disabled, Governor's Employ the Handi-<br />

agencies<br />

Committee.<br />

capped<br />

The Planning Commission<br />

Planning Commission functioned as the policy board for the<br />

The<br />

providing overall leadership and administrative guidance<br />

project,<br />

the Statewide Planning Project. The Commission has met regularly,<br />

for<br />

least every second month, for sessions-that lasted either one or<br />

at<br />

days. The membership, as appointed by Governor Daniel J. Evans<br />

two<br />

in 1967, continued intact without change. The officials selected<br />

early<br />

the first meeting served throughout the two,year period. Their<br />

at<br />

and affiliations follow: David W. Peyton, Chairman, Program<br />

names<br />

and Planning Assistant, Office of the Governor; Roger C. Larson,<br />

37


of the members of the Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

Some<br />

in Washington State meet in Olympia in 1967. They<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

left to right: The Hon. John Merrill, State House of Represen-<br />

are,<br />

Senator Robert C. Ridder; Austin St. Laurent; Mrs. Helen<br />

tatives;<br />

Roger C. Larson; The Hon. Alfred O. Adams, M.D.; Donal R.<br />

Powers;<br />

M. o; oLo rd G. Marquardt; Mrs. Beryl Gridley;<br />

Sparkman,<br />

David C. Carson; Clarence T. Freeman.<br />

38


Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education<br />

Vice-Chairman,<br />

Men, Washington State University; and Donald Po Holden, Secretary,<br />

for<br />

State Supervisor, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

S tat ewid e Advisory Commit tee<br />

Statewide Advisory Committee was composed of the members<br />

The<br />

the task forces, individuals selected initially by job title and<br />

of<br />

previous services to vocational rehabilitation.<br />

following:<br />

For example, thetask forces sought their members from the<br />

of cities County commissioners<br />

Mayors<br />

superintendents County extension agents<br />

School<br />

officials Representatives of disability groups<br />

Labor<br />

education directors Legislators<br />

Special<br />

Leaders Members of Coordinating Council<br />

Civic<br />

and other medical News, Media<br />

Physicians<br />

State personnel<br />

personnel<br />

Rehabilitation County Health officers<br />

Vocational<br />

staff members<br />

letters of invitation were sent to these people to attend<br />

Individual<br />

meetings held in each of the eight geographic regions into<br />

regional<br />

the state was divided for the project. The.meetings were held<br />

which<br />

the daytime in public places. Accompanying the invitations<br />

during<br />

small packets of materials describing the Planning Commission,<br />

were<br />

objectives, and scope. At themeeting they were invited to par-<br />

its<br />

further in the work of the Planning Commission. Those that<br />

ticipate<br />

to do so became members of the task forces. Much of the<br />

elected<br />

of the task forces was done during 1968. The names of the in-<br />

work<br />

who served on the. task forces are listed in the Appendix.<br />

dividuals<br />

Task Forces<br />

operational plan provided for the creation of six task<br />

The<br />

in any one of the eight regions. None of the regional groups<br />

forces<br />

to have more than five task forces. The task force titles<br />

elected<br />

listed as follows:<br />

are<br />

Force I Prevalence of the Disabled<br />

Task<br />

Force II Facilities Sheltered Workshops Rehabili-<br />

Task<br />

Resources<br />

tation<br />

Force III- Interagency Coordination<br />

Task<br />

Force IV Vocational Training and Technical Changes<br />

Task<br />

Force V Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped<br />

Task<br />

Task Force VI Selected Locally<br />

39


c<br />

o o<br />

:r<br />

m o<br />

I." 1 0<br />

f 0 h<br />

0<br />

m 0


Assistant Project Director, Allan Go Wood, functioned<br />

The<br />

the staff coordinator of the task forces. He attended many of<br />

as<br />

meetings, furnished copies of relevant documents to the task<br />

the<br />

and conferred regularly with the leaders of each task force<br />

forces,<br />

assure that they would continue to progress with their study.<br />

to<br />

task forces themselves,-however, were given considerable latitude<br />

The<br />

their methods of operation and in their reports. This diversity<br />

in<br />

attested to by the conflicting reports prepared by some of them.<br />

is<br />

This diversity was welcomed.<br />

Regional Committees<br />

task forces were organized in regions. Eight regions<br />

The<br />

the state were designated on the basis ofdemographic data supplied<br />

of<br />

the State of Washington's Planning and Community Affairs Agency.<br />

by<br />

regional committee was headed by a chairman or by a co-chairman<br />

Each<br />

by the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

selected<br />

of these chairmen were themselves members of the Commission,<br />

Several<br />

of the leaders were Legislators. All the committees operated in<br />

Two<br />

politically nonpartisan way. Efforts were made to include the<br />

a<br />

of both labor and industry, .all major disability groups, and<br />

views<br />

like. Partisans of particular viewpoints were welcomed, but did<br />

the<br />

not dominate the regional committees.<br />

Subcontractors<br />

Greenleigh Assoeiates, Inc.<br />

in the planning project Greenleigh Associates, Inc.,<br />

Early<br />

management consulting firm in New York City, was asked to do a<br />

a<br />

This study was to provide the Commission with information<br />

study.<br />

where in government vocational rehabilitation serviceS should<br />

about<br />

After the contract was signed, but before any work was done on<br />

be.<br />

information about the contract was provided the leaders of a<br />

it,<br />

of state agencies. These leaders of other state agencies<br />

number<br />

to object to this study and it was cancelled.<br />

tended<br />

of the reasons for the objection was that Governor Daniel<br />

One<br />

Evans had appointed a task force of eminent citizens of thestate<br />

J.<br />

make recommendations about where all of the executive agencies of<br />

to<br />

government should be placed. The leaders of these many agencies<br />

the<br />

consulted as to their own recommendations for their agencies and<br />

were<br />

It was felt that the Greenleigh Associates, Inc. study, being<br />

others.<br />

as it was on one agency alone, would be unable to have the<br />

focused<br />

and the vision of those involved in the Governor's task force<br />

breadth<br />

on<br />

executive reorganization.<br />

41


authors of REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE PROGRAMS PROVIDED<br />

The<br />

STATE AGENCIES are photographed together with the book. Left to<br />

BY<br />

David C. Carson, Project Director, Planning Commission for<br />

right:<br />

Rehabilitation; John B. Welsh, Jr., Attorney for the Wash-<br />

Vocational<br />

State Legislative Council; E. M. Oliver, Director, Division of<br />

ington<br />

RehablJtationo Since 1945 Mro Oliver has been the chief<br />

Vocational<br />

officer for Vocational Rehabilitation in Washington<br />

administrative<br />

State.<br />

42


Legislative Council<br />

Legislative Council of the State of Washington has par-<br />

The<br />

importantly in the work of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />

ticipated<br />

Rehabilitation. The Legislative Council is an official non-<br />

tional<br />

body created by the State Legislature td provide legal and<br />

partisan<br />

services to the Legislature. Members of the State House of<br />

other<br />

and the State Senate from both parties participate<br />

Representatives<br />

the work of the Legislative Council. Mr. Don Sampson is the<br />

in<br />

secretary. One of their attorneys, John B. Welsh, Jr., was<br />

executive<br />

by the Legislative Council to work part-time for the<br />

assigned<br />

Commission.<br />

Planning<br />

principal services were provided by the Legislative<br />

Two<br />

One of these was a compilation of laws relating to Voca-<br />

Council.<br />

Rehabilitation, a review of rehabilitation services of six<br />

tional<br />

state agencies and the interagency agreements which have<br />

different<br />

the effect of laws concerning vocational rehabilitation.<br />

second function was the drafting of laws recommended<br />

The<br />

the Planning Commission. The staff of the Legislative Council<br />

by<br />

done and is doing this task. The printed report of these find-<br />

has<br />

REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE--PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY STATE<br />

ings,<br />

was the result of this study authorized by the Planning<br />

AGENCIES,<br />

through a contract signed with the Washington State Legis-<br />

Commission<br />

lative Council in November 1967.<br />

Interagency Liaison<br />

the State of Washington a Workshop and Facilities<br />

Within<br />

Program financed by federal funds has been the responsibility<br />

Planning<br />

Payson H. Jeynes of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, in<br />

of<br />

The Planning Commission has worked with Mr. Jeynes and others<br />

Olympia.<br />

assist in his planning. Our Task Force II on Workshops Facilities,<br />

to<br />

Resources served as the regional advisory committee for this re-<br />

and<br />

facilities service. The aim of the Planning Commission<br />

habilitation<br />

to provide services for all those individuals who need help from<br />

is<br />

facilities, and resources so that by 1975 everyone in the<br />

workshops,<br />

needing these services will be able to receive them.<br />

state<br />

Comprehensive Health Planni$.<br />

the time Comprehensive Health Planning was authorized<br />

At<br />

1967, Governor Daniel J. Evans specified that it would be handled<br />

in<br />

the Planning and Community Affairs Agency of the State of<br />

through<br />

Prior to the staffing of the program with full-time<br />

Washington.<br />

a program management group made up of planners from other<br />

people,<br />

in the Health, Welfare, Manpower, Budget, and management<br />

agencies<br />

services was set up. The project director of the Planning Commission<br />

43


Vocational Rehabilitation was appointed to this Program Manage-<br />

for<br />

Group and served regularly on it. This helped to insure that<br />

ment<br />

Comprehensive Health Planning would have some flavor of vocational<br />

the<br />

It also insured that the major coordination of activ-<br />

rehabilitation.<br />

provided by the Program Management Group would influence the<br />

ities<br />

Commission.<br />

Planning<br />

Meeting of Planners University of WaShington<br />

meeting called by the staff of the Planning Commission<br />

A<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation was held in September 1967, at the<br />

for<br />

University of Washington.<br />

number of state agencies and university departments were<br />

A<br />

This is reported in further detail in Chapter V.<br />

represented.<br />

(See. Appendix for Minutes).<br />

Services to the Deaf<br />

series of meetings concerning services to the deaf were<br />

A<br />

by the project director of'the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />

called<br />

Rehabilitation. Invited to the meetings were representatives<br />

tional<br />

professional organizations providing services for the deaf: public<br />

of<br />

State School for the Deaf, specil education section of the<br />

schools,<br />

Superintendent of Public Instruction, State Health Department,<br />

State<br />

Department of Institutions, private non-profit groups providing<br />

the<br />

for the deaf, university departments providing special<br />

services<br />

and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Some deaf<br />

therapy,<br />

were also invited in each instance.<br />

leaders<br />

series of meetings resulted in a permanent council of<br />

The<br />

the deaf. The purpose of the council is to coordinate<br />

agenciesserving<br />

agency services and to assist in legislative and other endeavors.<br />

Trips t__o Rehabilitation Facilities<br />

Commission assumed that the cooperation of other agencies<br />

The<br />

be required if the State of Washington would have a Comprehensive<br />

would<br />

Center and a Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Accordingly, staff members of several other state agencies<br />

Center.<br />

Washington State were invited to accompany Planning Commission<br />

in<br />

and staff on fact-finding tours of similar facilities in other<br />

members<br />

Included were representatives of Central Budget Agency, Depart-<br />

states.<br />

of Institutions, Department of Labor and Industries, Department<br />

ment<br />

Public Assistance, Employment Security Department, and the Division<br />

of<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation. The reports of these activities are<br />

of<br />

described further in Chapter V.<br />

44


The Staff<br />

staff of the Planning Commission has been composed of<br />

The<br />

following individuals:<br />

the<br />

were:<br />

Consultants<br />

C. Carson, M.A., Project Director<br />

David<br />

G. Wood, B.A., Assistant Project Director<br />

Allan<br />

J. Simila, Administrative Secretary<br />

Mary<br />

C. Benedict, Secretary<br />

Mary<br />

The following part-time and temporary clerical employees<br />

Mead<br />

Marjorie<br />

Johns<br />

Joyce<br />

Alix Trager<br />

Engle<br />

Darlene<br />

Howard<br />

Maryrose<br />

Consultants have included the following listed individuals:<br />

William Wolfe, Director of Department of Special<br />

Dr.<br />

University of Texas<br />

Education,<br />

Hoyt Ponder, University of Washington<br />

Dr.<br />

Jeffrey G. Shapiro, Arkansas Rehabilitation<br />

Dr.<br />

and Training Center<br />

Research<br />

Albin, Computer Programmer, University of<br />

Wayne<br />

Washington<br />

Ayers, graduate student in the Vocational<br />

Andrea<br />

Counselor Training Program, University<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Washington<br />

of<br />

Lurie, graduate student in the Vocational<br />

Joseph<br />

Counselor Training Program, University<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

of Washington<br />

Staff Functions "Donated"<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation graciously offered<br />

The<br />

provide staff assistance and other services to the Planning Com-<br />

to<br />

for Vocational Rehabilitation. They specifically authorized<br />

mission<br />

services for two research analysts and one public relations<br />

half-time<br />

In addition, all the bookkeeping and accounting services were<br />

man.<br />

by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. For payroll<br />

provided<br />

the staff of the Planning Commissionwas served by the<br />

services<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation. Thetime actually served by<br />

Division<br />

the three half-time staff members was minimal. They are:<br />

45


Gibson, Research Analyst<br />

Norman<br />

Mead, Research Analyst<br />

Jean<br />

Elton Troth, Information Officer<br />

M. Oliver, Director of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />

E.<br />

as Consultant to the Planning Commission.<br />

served<br />

functioning of the office of the Planning Commission<br />

The<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation, like the functioning of many other<br />

for<br />

offices, was largely influenced by the clerical staff. The<br />

similar<br />

operation is attributable in great part to the administrative<br />

smooth<br />

Mary Simila. She assisted admirably the other staff<br />

secretary,<br />

and was able to help get them to push the project toward<br />

members<br />

The other permanent secretary, Mary Benedict, worked<br />

completion.<br />

the task forces. She was largely responsible for the cler-<br />

with<br />

services to the task forces. She was able to complete this<br />

ical<br />

work with a minimum of supervision.<br />

important<br />

Jean Mead has been a valued and loyal member of the<br />

Mrs.<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation for. several years. As research<br />

staff<br />

with overall supervision of the library of Vocational<br />

analyst<br />

she has learned which resources are available in<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

She not only helped provide these sources to the Planning<br />

print.<br />

she worked to help improve the style of the writings of<br />

Commission;<br />

Commission. Much of her work has had to be done after her reg-<br />

the<br />

employment was completed. Graceful touches in this and other<br />

ular<br />

materials of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />

written<br />

are often the product of Jean Mead. The Commission is par-<br />

tation<br />

grateful to Mrs. Simila, Mrs. Benedict, and Mrs. Mead for<br />

ticularly<br />

yeoman service.<br />

their<br />

M. Oliver has been State Director of Vocational Rehab-<br />

E.<br />

in Washington State since 1945. His national reputation<br />

ilitation<br />

vocational rehabilitation is deserved. The assistance.given<br />

in<br />

Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation and its staff<br />

the<br />

Mr. Oliver and the other staff members of Vocational Rehabili-<br />

by<br />

is hereby gratefully acknowledged. Mr. Oliver, on behalf<br />

tation<br />

the agency, applied for the grant which funded this two-year<br />

of<br />

proect. He served conscientiously the Planning Commission<br />

long<br />

as its Consultant.<br />

Planning Commission hereby acknowledges with gratitude<br />

The<br />

assistance given it by the Office of the Governor and by officials<br />

the<br />

other governmental agencies. The contribution of the private sector<br />

of<br />

rehabilitation has been an important one. Some 700 of these indi-<br />

in<br />

who worked on the task forces and in other ways have been given<br />

viduals<br />

of appreciation signed by Daniel J. Evans, Governor of the<br />

certificates<br />

of Washington, in appreciation for their "valued contribution and<br />

State<br />

dedication in planning services for the handicapped and dis-<br />

continued<br />

advantaged to enable them to become employable."<br />

46


CHAPTER IV<br />

METHOD OF OPERATION<br />

November 1967, the organization of the state into regions<br />

In<br />

task forces began. The Assistant Project Director was assigned<br />

and<br />

this responsibility.<br />

one person would be supervising the fact-gathering<br />

Since<br />

of the study, the size of the regions, both in terms of popula-<br />

phase<br />

as well as geography, was considered to be important. Existing<br />

tion<br />

divisions were considered. The six districts of the Division<br />

state<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation were rejected as being too large, making<br />

of<br />

difficult to bring representative people together for meetings.<br />

it<br />

13 divisions of the state used by the State Planning and Community<br />

The<br />

Agency were studied. These were also rejected as the time<br />

Affairs<br />

would not allow for the organizing and completion of the<br />

schedule<br />

in so many regions.<br />

survey<br />

the state was divided into eight convenient<br />

Ultimately,<br />

determined by concentration of population and accessibility<br />

regions<br />

to a suitable meeting place. (See map on preceding page.)<br />

each of the eight regions a general chairman was selected.<br />

For<br />

two regions two persons served as co-chairmen. Appropriately<br />

In<br />

scheduled organizational meetings were arranged in each region.<br />

sufficient time to allow for a response, letters of<br />

In<br />

were sent to county health officers, county commissioners,<br />

invitation<br />

school superintendents, heads of state agencies, labor union<br />

county<br />

mayors of.cities, heads of hospitals and institutions, presi-<br />

leaders,<br />

of chapters of the Washington Association for Retarded Children,<br />

dents<br />

of Economic Opportunity staff members, members of health coun-<br />

Office<br />

members of the Coordinating Council for Occupational Education,<br />

cils,<br />

of the Community College Board, county extension agents, and<br />

members<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation staff members, as well as<br />

Division<br />

Enclosed with these invitations were information sheets<br />

legislators.<br />

the scope and purpose of the planning project. The letter<br />

explaining<br />

invitation asked the person if he would come to work. Approximately<br />

of<br />

one hundred people attended each o2 the eight regional meetings.<br />

was planned that the task forces.would meet monthly for<br />

It<br />

six months. Most of the meetings were held in 1968,<br />

approximately<br />

the reports of the task forces being received by regional chair-<br />

with<br />

in the autumn.<br />

men<br />

47


47( )


attempt was made to assist the task forces, particu-<br />

An<br />

in routine ways. For example, a task force secretary could<br />

larly<br />

one copy of the minutes of a meeting to the project office,<br />

send<br />

the project office staff would make appropriate copies and<br />

where<br />

them to the task force members. Copies of relevant<br />

distribute<br />

were provided task force members. Final reports of one<br />

documents<br />

force were sent to similar task forces throughout the state.<br />

task<br />

Assistant Project Director contacted the chairman of each task<br />

The<br />

on a regular basis, attended a number of the meetings, and<br />

force<br />

the task forces to gather information helpful to them-<br />

encouraged<br />

and to the Planning Commission. Guidelines for the final<br />

selves<br />

were distributed.<br />

reports<br />

Force I, on the Prevalence of Disability, had<br />

Task<br />

assistance from the staff and from graduate students employed<br />

special<br />

to gather data.<br />

Force II, Workshops, Facilities, and Resources, had<br />

Task<br />

its objective a comprehensive study of workshops and facilities.<br />

for<br />

the eight study groups was Payson Jeynes, State Supervisor<br />

Assisting<br />

Facility Services for the Division of Vocational<br />

forRehabilitation<br />

Mr. Jeynes served a dual purpose in his consulting<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

He served the Planning Commission as he gathered information<br />

role.<br />

be incorporated into his Interim State Plan for Workshops and<br />

to<br />

Facilities.<br />

proved to be a satisfactory arrangement and Mr. Jeynes<br />

This<br />

helpful in providing expert direction to the task forces as they<br />

was<br />

to assess the kinds and quality of workshops and facilities<br />

sought<br />

available to certain handicapped people in this state.<br />

now<br />

helpful to this.phase of the study was a comprehensive<br />

Also<br />

detailed directory by Betty Marion, Charles Freeman, Carolyn<br />

and<br />

and Larry Paustian, graduate students in Vocational Counsel-<br />

Fisher,<br />

at the University of Washington. Dr. Jerald Forster provided<br />

ing<br />

direction and editorial comments. It was published in the<br />

general<br />

of 1968 by the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />

summer<br />

tation.<br />

members of the five task forces in each region met as<br />

The<br />

Almost without exception they worked conscientiously to<br />

scheduled.<br />

their tasks. In so doing they learned about the present<br />

complete<br />

to rehabilitate the handicapped and disadvantaged, heard<br />

program<br />

reports of its limitations, and suggested improvements.<br />

candid discussions about vocational rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

the task force meetings and the resulting frank reports taught<br />

in<br />

participants how marvelous this program of vocational rehabili-<br />

the<br />

can be and how inadequately it is now serving the people of<br />

tation<br />

State of Washington. More community leaders have seriously<br />

the<br />

the rehabilitation program than ever before. Their<br />

considered<br />

48


are sensible, practical, reflect their concern for<br />

recommendations<br />

in the delivery of services.<br />

improvements<br />

------A PROBLEM FOR TASK FORCES, TOO<br />

in the social sciences is inherently difficult;<br />

Research<br />

can one construct a project that meets all the<br />

rarely<br />

for scientific precision and o.rderliness that<br />

criteria<br />

some of the elegant research designs One<br />

characterizes<br />

in the physical sciences. For obvious reasons,<br />

finds<br />

research is even more difficult.<br />

evaluative<br />

Guidelines for Task Forces<br />

E. Carroll, Director<br />

Terence<br />

Institutes on Rehabili-<br />

Nat'l<br />

tation and Health Services<br />

the following page is a brief description of the several<br />

On<br />

forces. Each person invited to a regional meeting was handed<br />

task<br />

a sheet to help him decide on which of the task forces he would<br />

such<br />

It was felt that self-selection was the best technique.<br />

serve.<br />

guidelines prepared by the staff for each of the task<br />

The<br />

were handed the members after they had selected a particular<br />

forces<br />

force. These guidelines were modeled after those of the State-<br />

task<br />

Rehabilitation Planning Project of the State of Texas. The<br />

wide<br />

guidelines were designed by John Fenoglio and the other assist-<br />

Texas<br />

project director there, before he became Project Director in the<br />

ant<br />

State of Washington. Copies of the guidelines follow.<br />

49


WASHINGTON STATE PLNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

Task Force I The Disabled<br />

TASK FORCES<br />

purpose of this group is to determine the prevalence of disability in the<br />

The<br />

The categories of disability are broad ones which include physical limita-<br />

region.<br />

emotional problems, intellectual retardation, and cultural deprivation.<br />

tions,<br />

who are in prisons, reformatories, jails, mental hospitals, schools for the<br />

Those<br />

and special education classes have handicaps. Most of the 80,000 adults<br />

retarded,<br />

Washington State who cannot read at the sixth grade level are handicapped<br />

in<br />

Those receiving public assistance generally are handicapped. The<br />

vocationally.<br />

person and the migrant farm worker often is handicapped. Handicapping<br />

displaced<br />

tend to increase with age and with poverty. Determine who has what dis-<br />

conditions<br />

how many have multiple handicaps.<br />

ability,<br />

Force II Rehabilitation Facilities Sheltered Wrkshops Rehabilitation<br />

Task<br />

Resources<br />

purpose of this task force is to study the kinds of agencies listed above.<br />

The<br />

presently available in your region should be studied to determine the need<br />

Those<br />

them, the need for changes in them, the need for new ones. What disability<br />

for<br />

are served by them? How effective are the staff members? How does the<br />

groups<br />

unit cost compare with other such institutions? How well do they diagnose,•<br />

per<br />

and/or train the vocationally handicapped? Are adequate services available<br />

treat,<br />

or not in your region?<br />

Task Force III- Interagency Coordination<br />

problems are multiple and interrelated and do not fit into a single<br />

People's<br />

for service by any one agency. There has been a proliferation of agencies,<br />

category<br />

public and private. Poor organization, duplication, gaps in services, cross-<br />

both<br />

and confusion are hurtful to the handicapped and induce or continue de-<br />

purposes<br />

Services should be provided in a frugal way. The purpose of this task<br />

pendency.<br />

is to study interagency coordination and to recommend improvements in the<br />

force<br />

delivery system of services to the handicapped.<br />

Task Force IV Vocational Training and Technical Changes<br />

This task force has four primary objectives:<br />

To identify present training facilities<br />

i.<br />

To consider needs for new, improved, or expanded<br />

2.<br />

acilities<br />

training<br />

TO determine what gaps exist in present vocational<br />

3.<br />

training<br />

To enumerate technical changes which presently<br />

4.<br />

require job training or retraining<br />

Task Force V Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped<br />

purpose of this task force is to consider those regulatory, architectural,<br />

The<br />

informational, legislative, educational, and other barriers to the<br />

financial,<br />

of the handicapped. The elimination or the reduction of these barriers<br />

employment<br />

the goal.<br />

is<br />

Task Force VI Selected Locally<br />

Chairmen are encouraged to organize additional task force(s) to meet<br />

Regional<br />

needs.<br />

local<br />

50<br />

DGG 2/23/68


1-30-68<br />

WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

TASK FORCE I THE DISABLED<br />

Guidelines<br />

order to really know the correlation between the disabled and the services<br />

In<br />

to them it is important to determine the number of disabled residing<br />

available<br />

in this region. Useful data might be obtained by:<br />

A comprehensive survey of categories of disabled persons within<br />

Ao<br />

region at present through:<br />

our<br />

Local office of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

i.<br />

State Department of Public Assistance<br />

2.<br />

Services to the Blind<br />

3.<br />

Social Security Administration, Disability Determination<br />

4.<br />

Schools Local and State offices<br />

5.<br />

Community agencies, i.e., Red Cross, Heart, Cancer,<br />

6.<br />

Associations, etc.<br />

Tuberculosis<br />

Other sources which you may develop, both private and public<br />

7.<br />

B. Recommendations should<br />

Be based on providing comprehensive vocatlonal.rehabilltatlon<br />

i.<br />

to all the disabled who need, desire and would most<br />

services<br />

likely be eligible for such services by 1975.<br />

Be put on a priority basis in order to meetimmediate needs<br />

2.<br />

to plan for long range needs<br />

and<br />

kinds of information helpful to members of this task force will be<br />

Certain<br />

by the staff. Present and projected population figures, the numbers<br />

provided<br />

kinds of medical, dental, psychological, and other staff members, and the<br />

and<br />

will be provided where possible.<br />

like<br />

¸51


TASK FORCE I qUE, STIONNAIP.<br />

Services available to the disabled include: I. Diagnostic;<br />

Io<br />

Treatment; and 3. Evaluation and training. In your research did<br />

2.<br />

find the disabled appropriating these available services; if so,<br />

you<br />

what degree? If not, why not? In what wys might they be improved?<br />

to<br />

Note your impressions by the following categories:<br />

A. Physical disabilities<br />

Psycho social disabilities<br />

C. Mentally Iii<br />

D. Mentally Retarded<br />

E. Blind and Visually disabled<br />

F. Deaf<br />

G. Aged<br />

H. Migrant Workers<br />

I. Others<br />

52


What recommendations do you suggest, from the viewpoint of the<br />

II.<br />

you have contacted for new, mproved or expanded services,<br />

handicapped<br />

order that comprehensive vocational rehabilitation services might<br />

in<br />

provided for your reglon/county?<br />

be<br />

53


Disability Categories<br />

(Applicable to Agencies for the Blind)<br />

Blind<br />

Visual Impairments<br />

Other<br />

Impairments<br />

Hearing<br />

Deaf<br />

Totally<br />

Orthopedic deformity or impairments except<br />

Other<br />

(make maximum breakdowns<br />

amputations<br />

as paraplegia)<br />

such<br />

or Amputation of Members<br />

Absence<br />

Personality Disorders<br />

Mentaland<br />

Disorders<br />

Psychotic<br />

Disorders<br />

Neurotic<br />

Alcoholism<br />

Addiction<br />

Drug<br />

character, personality, and<br />

Other<br />

disorders<br />

behavior<br />

Conditions<br />

Cardiac<br />

Circulatory Conditions<br />

Other<br />

Diseases<br />

Respiratory<br />

System Disorders<br />

Digestive<br />

Retardation<br />

Mental<br />

if possible; mild, moderate,<br />

(breakdown,<br />

severe)<br />

and<br />

Cancer<br />

Stroke<br />

Impairments<br />

Speech,<br />

if possible; such as Functional,<br />

(breakdown,<br />

Palate, laryngectomies, Aphasia)<br />

Cleft<br />

Others<br />

All<br />

maximum breakdowns feasible; such as<br />

(make<br />

Palsy, Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis,<br />

Cerebral<br />

Dystrophy, Parkinson's Disease,<br />

uscular<br />

Diabetes, Haemophilia, etc.)<br />

Colostomies,<br />

54


WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

TASK FORCE II WORKSHOPS FACILITIES AND RESOURCES<br />

set of Definitions and Guidelines is furnished to provide direction for<br />

This<br />

research. The definitions are established by statute.<br />

the<br />

DEFINITIONS:<br />

Rehabilitation Facility<br />

facility operated for the primary purpose of assisting in the rehabili-<br />

A<br />

of handicapped persons:<br />

tation<br />

1. Providing one of the following types of services:<br />

Or<br />

Provided:<br />

Testing, fitting or training in the use of prostheses.<br />

(a)<br />

Pre-vocational or conditioning therapy.<br />

(b)<br />

Physical therapy or occupational therapy.<br />

(c)<br />

Adjustment training.<br />

(d)<br />

(e) Evaluation, treatment, or control of special disabilities.<br />

Where there is provided an integrated program of medical,<br />

2.<br />

psychological, social and vocational evaluation<br />

vocational,<br />

and services under competent professional supervision.<br />

The major portion of such evaluation and services is furnished<br />

i.<br />

the facility.<br />

within<br />

All medical and health services are prescribed and/or super-<br />

2.<br />

by a physician.<br />

vised<br />

Sheltered Workshop<br />

place where any manufacture or handiwork is carried on and which is<br />

A<br />

primarily to provide gainful employment for severely handicapped<br />

operated<br />

persons:<br />

As an interim step in the rehabilitation process toward<br />

i.<br />

employment in the competitive labor market; or<br />

permanent<br />

While employment opportunities for them do not.exist in the<br />

2.<br />

labor market.<br />

competitive<br />

55


Rehabilitation Resource<br />

comprehensive rehabilitation planning, a program of activities is<br />

For<br />

rehabilitation "resource" when<br />

a<br />

The program meets neither the Federal definitions of<br />

i.<br />

facility" nor "sheltered workshop", and<br />

"rehabilitation<br />

The program treats chronic, non-self-terminating physical,<br />

2.<br />

or emotional handicapping conditions, and<br />

mental,<br />

The services of the program contribute significantly to a<br />

3.<br />

plan with a vocational objective, and<br />

rehabilitation<br />

The program accepts direct referrals from DVR, with or<br />

4.<br />

payment of fees, costs, etc. by DVR.<br />

without<br />

in this task force will function as the regional advisory committee for<br />

Those<br />

State of Washington Workshop and Facility.Planning headed by Payson H.<br />

the<br />

Rehabilitation Facility Services, P. O. Box 528, Olympia, Washington<br />

Jeynes,<br />

The aim of the planning is to provide services for all those individ-<br />

98501.<br />

who need help from workshops, facilities, and resou=ces so that by the<br />

uals<br />

1975 everyone in the state needing these services will be able to receive<br />

year<br />

them.<br />

5.6


GUIDELINES<br />

Guidelines may be modified to serve as workable instruments suited to<br />

These<br />

area being studied.<br />

the<br />

vocational rehabilitation process is cnplex, and in effect, represents a<br />

The<br />

of the services of numerous facilities and disciplines on the problems<br />

focusing<br />

the disabled person. One counselor working alone woid rehabilitate very<br />

of<br />

people, but with a comprehensive range of services available to draw upon<br />

few<br />

can do an effective job for his clients. For this reason workshops, facili-<br />

he<br />

and other resources are essential factorsin providing for comprehensive<br />

ties<br />

vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

The following points are suggested as guidelines for task forces:<br />

i. Analysis of regional workshops.<br />

General sheltered workshops<br />

A.<br />

Number of Handicapped served.<br />

I.<br />

2. Range of skills required to do the variety of jobs offered.<br />

Specialized workshops<br />

B.<br />

By type of disability.<br />

i.<br />

Blind or visually disabled.<br />

a.<br />

Mentally retarded.<br />

b.<br />

Mentally ill.<br />

c.<br />

Orthopedic impairments.<br />

d.<br />

e.<br />

Cerebral palsied.<br />

Epileptic.<br />

f.<br />

Aged.<br />

g.<br />

By rehabilitation goals or type of operation. What produced.<br />

2.<br />

Evaluation.<br />

a.<br />

Personal habits.<br />

(i)<br />

Work adjustment.<br />

(2)<br />

Employment potential.<br />

(3)<br />

Terminal.<br />

b.<br />

For those considered unable to ever work<br />

(i)<br />

the competitive job market.<br />

in<br />

Severely disabled.<br />

(2)<br />

Aged.<br />

(3)<br />

Staffing<br />

C.<br />

Is staffing adequate?<br />

i.<br />

Does staff meet professional standards?<br />

2.<br />

Are volunteers being effectively utilized?<br />

3.<br />

Utilization of present workshops, facilities, and resources<br />

D.<br />

Are services available to all the disabled in ourregion<br />

i.<br />

need or request them?<br />

who<br />

Are there overlaps in services offered by various workshops,<br />

2.<br />

facilities, and resources?<br />

Projection of needfor additional workshops, facilities, and resources<br />

E.<br />

How many more disabled can be expected to need services in<br />

i.<br />

region by 1975? (Correlate with findings of Task Force I)<br />

.this<br />

How must workshops, facilities, and resources be modified or<br />

2.<br />

to accommodate these needs?<br />

expanded<br />

57


TASK FORCE II .QUES.TIONNAIRE<br />

What workshops, facilities, and resources in the region or county are now pro-<br />

I.<br />

the following types of personal treatment services to the disabled?<br />

viding<br />

A. Diagnosis(Name)<br />

Is there, in the region or the county, a comprehensive workshop,<br />

i.<br />

or resource for disability diagnosis?<br />

facility,<br />

a. If yes, describe it<br />

all present workshops, facilities, and resources being utilized<br />

Are<br />

the disabled?<br />

for<br />

a. If yes, how?<br />

b. If no, why not?<br />

What are the present capacities of diagnostic workshops, facilities,<br />

3.<br />

resources serving the disabled?<br />

and<br />

What additional diagnostic workshops, facilities, and resources are<br />

4.<br />

needed?<br />

58


B. Treatment (List by types of service offered)<br />

Are all workshops, treatment facilities, and resources being utilized<br />

I.<br />

the purpose of providing vocational rehabilitation services to<br />

for<br />

disabled?<br />

the<br />

If yes., how?<br />

a.<br />

b. If no, why not?<br />

What are the individual and combined capacities of workshops, treatment<br />

2.<br />

and resources in terms of the number of disabled they can<br />

facilities,<br />

serve at one time?<br />

Wha additional workshops, treatment facillt±es, and resources in<br />

3.<br />

opinion, would best accomplish the goal of this study?<br />

your<br />

C. Evaluation and Training (List sope of each)<br />

59


How are present evaluation and training workshops, facilities,<br />

i.<br />

resources being utilized in the vocational rehabilitation of<br />

and<br />

the disabled?<br />

How many disabled individuals can be served currently by these<br />

2.<br />

facilities, and resources?<br />

workshops,<br />

Write your own analysis of the workshops, facilities, and resources in<br />

II.<br />

region or county, based on what you have observed during the course<br />

your<br />

this study. Please make recommendations for new, expanded or modi-<br />

of<br />

workshops, facilities, and resources on a priority basis.<br />

fied<br />

60


WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

TASK FORCE III INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION<br />

Guidelines<br />

11/21/67<br />

problems are multiple and interrelated and do not fit into a single<br />

People's<br />

for service by any one agency; therefore, to m6et clients' needs,<br />

category<br />

must have access to many types of specialized services. Consequently,<br />

agencies<br />

are dependent upon one another if they are to provide adequately for<br />

agencies<br />

their clients.<br />

might assume that these agencies would be fully aware of each other's<br />

One<br />

and would constantly refer cass to each other. Unfortunately, this<br />

services<br />

not generally the case. It has been found that agencies in general do not<br />

is<br />

what other agencies are doing or planning, even if they both are concerned<br />

know<br />

the same category of disability. Much of this problem is owing to lack of<br />

with<br />

media through which thinking and information could be exchanged.<br />

communication<br />

To study these problems this task force is to:<br />

and analyze current inter-agency coordination.<br />

Study<br />

together members of thevarious local agencies that provide<br />

Bring<br />

services to the handicapped and exchange information.<br />

Survey the agencies serving the region.<br />

ways by which closer coordination can be accomplished<br />

Recommend<br />

all community agencies both private and public to<br />

between<br />

in greater benefits for all the handicapped population in the<br />

result<br />

region.<br />

Suggested means for achieving these goals:<br />

Ascertain existing agencies functioning in the region.<br />

1.<br />

Determine its authority (federal, state, local, public, private,<br />

a.<br />

etc.)<br />

Determine its purpose {type of service provided or which<br />

b.<br />

category)<br />

handicap<br />

Coordinated with which community services or agencies.<br />

c.<br />

Procedures for Inter-Agency Exchange<br />

2.<br />

Determine referral procedures<br />

a.<br />

criterion<br />

(1)<br />

data required<br />

(2)<br />

standard fees<br />

(5)<br />

inter-agency staffing<br />

(4)<br />

Joint programs<br />

b.<br />

to sponsor activities of mutual,benefit<br />

(1)<br />

leadership training<br />

(a)<br />

operate common facility<br />

(b)<br />

Consider adequacy of present and projected inter-agency coo.rdination and<br />

5.<br />

ways in which closer cooperation between agencies providing<br />

recommend<br />

can be developed to provide adequate vocational rehabilitation<br />

services<br />

to fulfill the need of the handicapped individuals.<br />

services<br />

.61


TASK FORCE III UESTIO,NNAIRE<br />

questionnaire is provided for optional use in cgnJunction with the<br />

This<br />

Force III Guidelines. It is not intended to be comprehensive or<br />

Task<br />

but merely a beginning for the task force members to pur-<br />

all-inclusive<br />

and study in depth those areas of interest to the local community.<br />

sue<br />

I. What local agencies are providing services to the handicapped<br />

A. Whattypes of srvices are provided?<br />

B. Cost of service?<br />

C. Restrictions--age, sex, type of disability, etc.<br />

II. Referral Policy<br />

A. What method is used?<br />

B. What are the sources of agency referrals?<br />

62


C. Is there a system for reporting back on referred clients?<br />

IIl. Coordination:<br />

Is the present interagency Coordination satisfactory? If<br />

A.<br />

what do you recommend?<br />

not,<br />

B. Do agencies exchange information and confidential records?<br />

C. Are there any interagency agreements?<br />

D. Are there any anticipated future interagency problems?<br />

If so, what do you recommend?<br />

Request any other recommendations, comments, gripes, etc.,<br />

IV.<br />

may be beneficial in providing better vocational re-<br />

which<br />

services to the handicapped individuals in your<br />

habilitation<br />

region/county.<br />

hatarrangements have been made for regional planning, on a<br />

V.<br />

basis, for services to disabled persons?<br />

continual


Name of Aency:<br />

2. Address of Agency:<br />

TASK FORCE ,II,I<br />

SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET<br />

SRVEY OF AGEN$IES AND ORq,ANIZATIO<br />

3. Structure of Agency (if percentage, indicate)<br />

Federal<br />

Mu{cip State<br />

lity<br />

a<br />

Local<br />

County<br />

Non-Profit<br />

Private<br />

4. Source of Referral:<br />

Physician<br />

Service<br />

Employment<br />

Welfare<br />

Institution<br />

Educational<br />

Association<br />

Health<br />

Individual<br />

Other<br />

5. Type of Service Provided:<br />

Service<br />

Medical<br />

Counseling<br />

As'itance<br />

Ffnancial<br />

Shelter<br />

Service<br />

Psychiatric<br />

Placement<br />

Research<br />

Other<br />

6. Cost to Client:<br />

None<br />

Ability to pay<br />

On<br />

fee<br />

Regular<br />

(explain<br />

Other<br />

64


7. Services Restricted<br />

Type of Disability<br />

Sex<br />

*If checked, please describe restrictions: i.e., Ages 10-16 only, etc.


TASK FORCE IV GUIDELINES<br />

VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND TECHNICAL CHANGES<br />

1-30-68<br />

the disabled individual frequently is at the fFinge of the job market<br />

Since<br />

terms of vocational skills and training, too many times he is among those<br />

in<br />

hired and first fired." The task force on vocational training and<br />

"last<br />

change has four primary objectives:<br />

technical<br />

To identify present training facilities<br />

i.<br />

To consider needs for new, improved, or expanded<br />

2.<br />

facilities<br />

training<br />

To determine what gaps exist in present vocational<br />

3.<br />

training<br />

To enumerate technical changes, which presently<br />

4.<br />

require job training or retraining.<br />

general, vocational training for the handicapped in industry is handled by<br />

In<br />

training, or formal apprenticeships for the skilled trades.<br />

on-the-job<br />

education programs are administered through the public school system,<br />

Special<br />

education for a variety of disabilities which include the blind,<br />

providing<br />

sighted, physically handicapped, neurologically impaired, deaf,<br />

partially<br />

retarded, those requiring speech and hearing therapy, and the emotionally<br />

mentally<br />

Work habits rather than job skills are stressed in secondary school<br />

disturbed.<br />

education programs.<br />

special<br />

the program for the education of the migrant worker is relatively new<br />

Although<br />

the curriculum of the publicschools, it is now receiving greatly increased<br />

in<br />

Is it recognized as one aspect of education in your local school<br />

attention.<br />

district?<br />

to rehabilitation and available to the handicapped in our area are<br />

Related<br />

programs for adults and out-of-school youth who attend classes on<br />

educational<br />

part-time basis. Special needs for full-time continuing education are met<br />

a<br />

public schools, vocational-technical schools, community colleges, business<br />

in<br />

and other colleges and universities. The Federal Manpower Development<br />

colleges<br />

Training Act offers retraining for those who are unemployed and for those<br />

and<br />

need upgrading and are capable of handling more than they are at the present<br />

who<br />

Training in basic education skills is also offered through MDTA. More<br />

time.<br />

40 different separate training programs are being provided directly through<br />

than<br />

funds. Studies of these services may indicate some areas where over-<br />

Federal<br />

lapping can be avoided.<br />

1965 literacy is being promoted through the Adult Basic Education program,<br />

Since<br />

adults are encouraged to complete high school through the Adult High School<br />

and<br />

Diploma program and the program for the Certificate of Educational Competence.<br />

66


TASK FORCE IV UESTIONNAIRE<br />

VOCATIONAL TRAINING AD TECICAL CHANCE<br />

order to accomplish the purposes of this study, it may be<br />

In<br />

to survey your community as to the numb#r and types of train-<br />

propriate<br />

ing. facilities available to the disabled.<br />

the facilities in your community presently providing vo-<br />

List<br />

training to the disabled and briefly describe the type<br />

cational<br />

of raining offered:<br />

What other present training facilities might be utilized for<br />

2.<br />

disabled?<br />

the


Which educational programs are being utilized? (check where<br />

3.<br />

appropriate)<br />

Adult Migrant Education SpeCial Education<br />

What disabling categories? (list)<br />

Are local labor unions participating in on-the-job training or<br />

4.<br />

for the disabled?<br />

apprenticeships<br />

If yes, which one, and in what ways?


What industries or businesses are presently providing on-the-<br />

job training to disabled persons?<br />

What others could be utilized?<br />

69


6. What technical changes will require'new training facilities?<br />

7. nat new training facilities will be needed?<br />

In what ways are the present training needs of your region be-<br />

8.<br />

met, and in what ways might they be improved?<br />

ing<br />

7O


9. rite your reeomendations for future training needs<br />

71


11/21/67<br />

WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

TASK FORCE V BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT OF THE HANDICAPPED<br />

Guidelines<br />

guidelines for surveying the barriers confronting the handicapped<br />

Suggested<br />

in his pursuit for developing his maximum potential.<br />

individual<br />

regulatory, architectural, financial, manpower, social, cultural, age,<br />

Consider<br />

awareness, barriers, and other deterrents that are prevelant in your<br />

public<br />

community.<br />

I. Regul.atory Barriers<br />

Restricted Services<br />

A.<br />

Age groups-<br />

i.<br />

Locality requirements<br />

2.<br />

Specific disabling categories<br />

5.<br />

Unrealistic physical standards<br />

4.<br />

Undue emphasis on immediate vocational objectives<br />

5.<br />

Appropriations effects on<br />

B.<br />

Manpower and recruiting<br />

1.<br />

Facilities and services<br />

2.<br />

Percent of handicapped population served<br />

S.<br />

Backlog awaiting service<br />

a.<br />

individuals unaware of vocational rehabilitation<br />

b.<br />

possibilities<br />

Recommend actions necessary to overcome, both present and<br />

C.<br />

II. Financial Barriers<br />

barriers that effect the rehabilitation processes<br />

future,<br />

your community<br />

in<br />

Sources of program support<br />

A.<br />

Private support<br />

1.<br />

a.<br />

endoents<br />

civic organizations<br />

b:<br />

contributed services<br />

c.<br />

Local<br />

2.<br />

city<br />

a.<br />

county<br />

b.<br />

State and federal<br />

S.<br />

adequacy of support<br />

a.<br />

special education in public schools<br />

b.<br />

Anticipated future fund requirements<br />

B.<br />

Sources<br />

1.<br />

Aount<br />

2.<br />

Procedures for procuring funds<br />

S.<br />

4. Support in poverty areas<br />

72


III. Public Awareness<br />

is generally recognized that the ±nterests of the local population<br />

It<br />

best served where there is sustained local interest and participa-<br />

are<br />

This is especially true of this statewide planning for compre-<br />

tion.<br />

vocational rehabilitation services for a11 handicapped Washing-<br />

hensive<br />

tonians.<br />

Public awareness programs should set A. orth"<br />

Size and nature of the disabled population<br />

1.<br />

Needs of the handicapped<br />

2.<br />

Contribution to local, state and national economy<br />

3.<br />

Numbers presently utilizing vocational rehabilitation services<br />

4.<br />

Emphasize responsibility community has for care of its own<br />

5.<br />

Commission's Public Information Program should:<br />

B.<br />

Incorporate the use of all news media for creating a public<br />

i.<br />

of the Statewide Planning Project and its purpose.<br />

awareness<br />

Publicize the task forcefunctions and areas of responsi-<br />

2.<br />

bility.<br />

Enlist the aid of all professional organizations in defining the<br />

C.<br />

Project and its purpose to professionals in all allied fields.<br />

Study and recommend a system of public information and public<br />

D.<br />

programs to inform the general public on:<br />

relations<br />

Basic knowledge of the handicapped and disabled<br />

1.<br />

Referral information<br />

2.<br />

Available vocational rehabilitation facilities and services<br />

3.<br />

Needed vocational rehabilitation facilities and services<br />

4.<br />

IV. Architectural and Design Barriers<br />

Identify present physical barriers of the handicapped individual.<br />

A.<br />

should include his entire environment; home, training area,<br />

This<br />

place of employment, transportation, transient facilities,<br />

.workshop,<br />

area, etc.<br />

recreational<br />

Recommend procedures and methods to mitigate or eliminate all<br />

B.<br />

barriers<br />

existing<br />

Recommend specific design characteristics and features to be<br />

C.<br />

in future facilities and equipment which will be or<br />

considered<br />

may be utilized by the handicapped.<br />

73


questionnaire is provided for optional use in conjunction with<br />

This<br />

Task Force V Guidelines. It. is not intended to be comprehensive or<br />

the<br />

but merely a beginning for the task force members to pur-<br />

all-inclusive<br />

and study in depth those areas of interest to the local community.<br />

sue<br />

Financial and Legislative<br />

methods of financing services for vocational rehabilita-<br />

What<br />

programs are currently in use in your community?<br />

tion<br />

a.. 1r state government<br />

b. by city and county government<br />

c. by non-profit agencies<br />

d. by private agencies<br />

e. y federal government<br />

f. by others


What anunts of money have been spent for operation of vocational<br />

2.<br />

services and facilities in your area?<br />

rehabilitation<br />

a. this year<br />

b. last year<br />

c. ten years ago<br />

What has been done; what is being' done now; and what should be<br />

3.<br />

about applying for federal grants-in-aid to help provide<br />

done<br />

rehabilitation services for the handicapped in your<br />

vocational<br />

region?<br />

4. Recommendations<br />

Public Awareness<br />

to change, expand, or rescind current legislation to im-<br />

a.<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation srvices to the handi-<br />

prove<br />

capped<br />

to initiate new legislation for correcting current defici-<br />

b.<br />

and providing adequate services in anticipation of<br />

encies<br />

future needs<br />

What are the key local organizations and agencies which have<br />

I.<br />

most interested, and helpful, in VR programs?<br />

been


ho are the key individuals in the community who can or should<br />

2.<br />

expected to take the lead in securing local action on be-<br />

be<br />

half of Vocational Rehabilitation?<br />

nat officers and administrative units of city and oo'ty gov-<br />

3.<br />

can be counted on for help in sscuring local support?<br />

e.ent<br />

hat is being done in your region/countyto increase public<br />

4.<br />

and information about VR services to secure public<br />

awareness<br />

for improving services and facilities; and to encour-<br />

support<br />

individual use of these services and facilities when<br />

age<br />

needed and available?<br />

hat are the best methods to .use in carrying out the public<br />

5.<br />

objective in your region? County? Community?<br />

awareness<br />

a.<br />

public meetings<br />

open houses at VR facilities<br />

b.<br />

speeches to local clubs, or groups<br />

c.<br />

printed leaflets<br />

d.<br />

newspapers<br />

e.<br />

radio and T spots or programs<br />

f.<br />

other<br />

g.<br />

76


CHAPTER V<br />

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Estimates of the Prevalence and lnc±dence of HandieappedPersons<br />

principal concern of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />

One<br />

Rehabilitation was the determination of the number and kind<br />

tional<br />

disabled persons in the State of Washington. The determination<br />

of<br />

incidence of vocational disability was necessary in order to<br />

of<br />

the correlation between the disabled and the services<br />

establish<br />

to them and to plan for adequate future services.<br />

available<br />

THE COISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />

the Department of Planning and Community Affairs (or<br />

That<br />

successor agency) in cooperation with the Division of<br />

its<br />

Rehabilitation, the Departments of Health,<br />

Vocational<br />

Public Assistance and Employment Security,<br />

Institutions,<br />

and the Regional Medical Program:<br />

expand studies to identify thehandicapped in<br />

1.<br />

state;<br />

the<br />

study private and voluntary organizations as<br />

2.<br />

as state organizations which provide<br />

well<br />

services to these handicapped;<br />

determine the number of disabled who seek<br />

3.<br />

who are rejected for these services;<br />

services<br />

and<br />

recommend the allocation of staff to serve fully<br />

4.<br />

disabled people.<br />

all<br />

is defined as the total number of handicapped<br />

Prevalence<br />

in the State of Washington at a given point in time. Inci-<br />

people<br />

is defined as the number who become handicapped during a one<br />

dence<br />

period.<br />

year<br />

methods involved included the assignment of a.task<br />

The<br />

in each regional committee of the state. .Of all the task<br />

force<br />

these encountered the greatest problems. In the summer<br />

forces,<br />

1968 a conference of task force leaders was held, plus staff<br />

of<br />

of the State Planning and Community Affairs Agency, the<br />

members<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation, university staff members<br />

Division<br />

77


staff members of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehab-<br />

and<br />

Two graduate students at the University of Washington in<br />

ilitation.<br />

Counseling were employed for two months each in 1968<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

do esearch in this field.<br />

to<br />

studies were considered. Two'reports were parti-<br />

National<br />

helpful. The two most influential were CHRONIC CONDITIONS<br />

cularly<br />

ACTIVITY LIMITATION, UNITED STATES,. July 1961-June 1963, National<br />

AND<br />

for Health Statistics, Series I0, No. 17, U. S. Department of<br />

Center<br />

Education and Welfare, Public Health Services, May 1965,<br />

Health,<br />

D.C.; and DISABILITY WORK AND INCOME MAINTENANCE: PRE-<br />

Washington,<br />

OF DISABILITY, 1966, Lawrence W. Haber, Social Scurity<br />

VALENCE<br />

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social<br />

Bulletin,<br />

Security Administration, May 1968.<br />

addition, the final reports of the statewide planning<br />

In<br />

from many of the other states were studied to gather relevant<br />

studies<br />

The Commission would like to acknowledge particularly the help.<br />

data.<br />

has come from the Final Report of the State of Wisconsin,<br />

that<br />

Sather, Ph.D., Project Administrator, and the Final Report,<br />

William<br />

Planning for Vocational Rehabilitation Services,<br />

ComprehensiveStatewide<br />

of Ohio, David Tait, Ed.D., Research Director. The major help<br />

State<br />

Jerald Forster, Ph.D., Professor of Rehabilitation Counseling,<br />

of<br />

of Washington, who served as Task Force I Chairman in the<br />

University<br />

area; and Donald R. Johns, Ph.D., Assistant Supervisor of<br />

Seattle<br />

State of Washington, Department of Institutions, who was<br />

Planning,<br />

of Task Force I in the South Puget Sound Region, is acknowl-<br />

Chairman<br />

Dr. Johns discussed the study on the prevalence of disability<br />

edged.<br />

several occasions. Dr. Forster was the supervisor of two graduate<br />

on<br />

at the University of Washington, Miss Andrea Ayers and Mr.<br />

students<br />

Lurie, who gathered data on the prevalence of disability. Mr.<br />

Joseph<br />

W. Walker, Supervisor of the Population and Research Division<br />

John<br />

the Planning and Community AffairsAgency, State of Washington,<br />

of<br />

the documents of his agency on population and also partici-<br />

shared<br />

in the conference held in 1968 on the prevalence of disability.<br />

pated<br />

summary, it is estimated that the incidence of potential<br />

In<br />

to Vocational Rehabilitation in the year 1975 is 37,500.<br />

referrals<br />

number of people, 37,500, would be expected to request Vocational<br />

This<br />

services in 1975 and be both eligible and feasible<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

these services. This many people should be rehabilitated, in 1975.<br />

for<br />

is expected that this would involve at least a ten-fold increase<br />

It<br />

staff and case service monies. The combination of service agencies<br />

in<br />

have a synergistic effect, providing better services at lower<br />

should<br />

However, the increasing costs to the more severely disabled<br />

costs.<br />

have the effect of increasing costs.<br />

will<br />

78


37,500<br />

feasible and interested potential new<br />

Eligible,<br />

clients of Vocational Rehabilitation in the year 1975<br />

12,500<br />

disabled<br />

Physically<br />

people<br />

of total clients<br />

1/3<br />

25,000<br />

ill, alcoholics, mental<br />

Mentally<br />

public offenders,<br />

retardates,<br />

disadvantaged<br />

socially<br />

2/3 of total clients<br />

have, however, taken the position that rehabilitation<br />

We<br />

the long run pays rather than costs. To the degree that the<br />

in<br />

people can be made self-supporting, society is benefited.<br />

handicapped<br />

benefit to society is both short-range and long-range.<br />

This<br />

are many complicating factors in trying to anticipate<br />

There<br />

number of handicapped individuals in Washington State in the year<br />

the<br />

Our government is even now deploying weapons for atomic war-<br />

1975.<br />

If we have this kind of war, how many handicapped people will<br />

fare.<br />

be left in the United States: one million, fifty million, or none?<br />

State has an exceptionally high level of income.<br />

Washington<br />

in recent years according to figures of the Employment Secu-<br />

However,<br />

Department of Washington State, this state has had approximately<br />

rity<br />

percent more unemployed people than has the nation as a whole.<br />

one<br />

marginal person who is unemployed in another state tends to be<br />

The<br />

to areas with high employment and high wages, irrespective of<br />

drawn<br />

the actual employment which might be offered him.<br />

1968 amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act<br />

The<br />

Considerably the eligibility criteria for vocational rehab-<br />

widened<br />

services. Not only are family members of handicapped persons<br />

ilitation<br />

eligible for services, but the socially disadvantaged also were<br />

now<br />

eligible. The poor have more handicaps than those who have<br />

made<br />

Public Assistance cases have more disabilities than the rest<br />

money.<br />

the population. The Public Assistance roll has been kept down in<br />

of<br />

because of the residence requirement. It is postulated that if<br />

part<br />

requirement were eliminated, there would be an influx of recip-<br />

this<br />

from other states, people drawn to the high Public Assistance<br />

ients<br />

in this state. This is already happening in some states. In<br />

grants<br />

week 50,000 new Public Assistance recipients were added to the<br />

one<br />

in New York City, alone. Washington State, too, might see an<br />

roll<br />

of recipients from less generous Western states since the test<br />

influx<br />

court case knocks out the residence requirement for Public Assistance.<br />

solutions have been advanced to meet this problem.<br />

Several<br />

is the suggestion of Governor Nelson Rockefeller of New York that<br />

One<br />

Public Assistance be made a nationwide, Federally supported effort.<br />

79.


second suggestion is that of the economic advisor to U.S. Senator<br />

A<br />

Goldwater, Milton Friedman, a professor of Economics at the<br />

Barry<br />

of Chicago, that there be a negative income tax. What-<br />

University<br />

the solution, it is assumed that the existing Public Assistance<br />

ever<br />

will get worse before it gets better. There is a crisis<br />

situation<br />

welfare services in the United States, and in'Washington State.<br />

in<br />

reasoned estimate of services for this population seems to<br />

Every<br />

low.<br />

prove<br />

of the following material is adapted from the Final<br />

Much<br />

Comprehensive Statewide Planning for Vocational Rehabili-<br />

Report<br />

Services Wisconsin, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />

tation<br />

Sather, Ph.D., Project Administrator, 1968.<br />

William<br />

Estimates of Vocational Rehabilitation Need<br />

this section information from various sources will be<br />

In<br />

in order to estimate the total number of handicapped in-<br />

analyzed<br />

in Washington who should receive Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

dividuals<br />

during the 1975 fiscal.year. The year 1975 is the one in<br />

services<br />

the expansion of Vocational Rehabilitation programs and ser-<br />

which<br />

should reach a point of saturation so that all handicapped<br />

vices<br />

persons in need will be served.<br />

need for vocational rehabilitation services may be<br />

The<br />

by professional judgment, but the various levels of<br />

determined<br />

for service are directly related to the motivation of handi-<br />

demand<br />

persons. A basic goal for Vocational Rehabilitation, in<br />

capped<br />

with other agencies, is not only to reach all eligible<br />

cooperation<br />

persons to inform them of vocational rehabilitation ser-<br />

handicapped<br />

available, but to motivate them to accept needed services.<br />

vices<br />

point of saturation is reached when the backlog of clients has<br />

The<br />

served and the lowest practical level of demand for services<br />

been<br />

been filled. In order to reach this lowest practical level it<br />

has<br />

be necessary to contact large numbers of handicapped persons,<br />

will<br />

of whom will prove to be infeasible for service because they<br />

many<br />

too poorly motivated. On the other hand, procedures should be<br />

are<br />

to continuously increase the proportion of clients con-<br />

developed<br />

who can be successfully motivated. Public information on<br />

tacted<br />

rehabilitation is a recognized need. Widespread publicity,<br />

vocational<br />

for a program unable to meet the demands made upon it, does<br />

however,<br />

to improve the program image. (See Administrative Aspects,<br />

little<br />

Public Relations, page 208.)<br />

technical definition of clients served by Vocational<br />

A<br />

is the total number who appear on the agency caseload<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

a given year regardless of whether they were carried over<br />

during<br />

the previous year, referred and/or accepted for service during<br />

from<br />

year, closed rehabilitated or not rehabilitated .during the year<br />

the<br />

carried over to the next year.<br />

or<br />

80


of numbers of clients who should be served in<br />

Estimates<br />

are made for the following target populations: Persons who<br />

1975<br />

a disability which is a vocational handicap, including the so-<br />

have<br />

disadvantaged, mentally ill, alcoholics, mental retardates<br />

cially<br />

public offenders. The basic methodology employed in arriving<br />

and<br />

estimates for the group follows:<br />

at<br />

of an estimate of the revlence of persons<br />

Establishment<br />

employable ase (or some more appropriate ase range)_ who should at<br />

of<br />

time be referred for vocational rehabilitation services. Preva-<br />

some<br />

is defined as the total number of handicapped persons in a tar-<br />

lence<br />

group in the State of Washington at a given point in time, e.g.,<br />

get<br />

1975.<br />

of an estimate of number of persons of employ-<br />

Derivation<br />

age who should be referred for vocational rehabilitation during<br />

able<br />

one-Yea p.e.riod (i.e., 1975.) This is related to the incidence of<br />

a<br />

handicapped persons, i.e., the number who become handi-<br />

vocationally<br />

capped during a one-year period.<br />

of the Vocational Rehabilitation caseload indicates<br />

Analysis<br />

there is a significant proportion of clients in each target group<br />

that<br />

in a given year who had been served by Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

served<br />

or more times previously. This is because some clients who have<br />

one<br />

rehabilitated are found to be in need of services again. These<br />

been<br />

are reopened so that additional services can be provided. Some<br />

cases<br />

groups such as alcoholics and the mentally ill may be less<br />

target<br />

resulting in greater proportions requiring services more than<br />

stable,<br />

once.<br />

in future years more emphasis will be placed<br />

Furthermore,<br />

selective follow-up of closed cases so that the proportion of closed<br />

on<br />

that are reopened will increase. The estimates of the numbers<br />

cases<br />

to be served in each target group in 1975 will be conserva-<br />

of.clients<br />

if the clients who are.to be served more than once are not taken<br />

tive<br />

account. Therefore, an allowance of about 20 to 25 percent should<br />

into<br />

be added to the estimate of the number to be served.<br />

these figures would be exaggerated if consideration were<br />

Yet<br />

given to duplication of count. The estimates of the numbers of<br />

not<br />

to be served in each target group have been arrived at inde-<br />

persons<br />

without taking into account the number of potentialclients<br />

pendently<br />

can be assigned to two or more target groups. For example, there<br />

who<br />

some mentally ill individuals who are also mentally retarded.<br />

are<br />

extent to which the estimates of numbers to be served in each<br />

The<br />

group are inflated because of this resulting duplication of<br />

target<br />

cannot be determined with accuracy until more research is done.<br />

count<br />

this time, it is therefore assumed that the inflating and deflating<br />

At<br />

factors described above offset each other.<br />

81


indicated, the point of saturation in program develop-<br />

As<br />

will be reached when the entire backlog of handicapped persons<br />

ment<br />

need has been served. As vocational rehabilitation programs ex-<br />

in<br />

a part of this backlog will be served each year through 1975.<br />

pand,<br />

order to maintain this level of saturation each year beyond 1975,<br />

In<br />

number of clients who are brought into the caseload each year<br />

the<br />

be about equal to the number who are closed either rehabili-<br />

should<br />

or not rehabilitated. The flow chart of service statistics<br />

tated<br />

the five-year period 1964-1968 shows this has not been the case<br />

for<br />

the Washington Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

for<br />

are factors which may result in continuing program<br />

There<br />

beyond 1975 such as:<br />

expansion<br />

increase in the general population resulting<br />

continued<br />

proportionate increase in the handicapped popula-<br />

in<br />

tion;<br />

eligibility criteria so that greater pro-<br />

broadened<br />

of the handicapped population may legally<br />

portions<br />

be served;<br />

vocational rehabilitation techniques resulting<br />

improved<br />

the extension of services to many who previously<br />

in<br />

would not have been served.<br />

procedures for estimating vocational rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

and the estimates themselves, are presented below.<br />

need<br />

The Physically Disabled<br />

National Center for Health Statistics published a re-<br />

The<br />

(1965) port 1 presented characteristics of persons with limita-<br />

which<br />

of activity due to chronic disease or impairment. These degrees<br />

tion<br />

limitation wer.e:<br />

of<br />

to carry on major activity (housework,<br />

unable<br />

employment)<br />

school,<br />

in amountor kind of major activity<br />

limited<br />

limited in major activity<br />

not<br />

Chronic Conditions and Activity Limitation, United States, July<br />

i.<br />

1963. National Center for Health Stat%stics-Series i0<br />

1961-June<br />

17, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public<br />

No.<br />

Services, May 1965, Washington, D. C.<br />

Health<br />

82


1964<br />

_FY<br />

INTAKE<br />

VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, STATE OF WASHINGTON<br />

GROSS CASELOADS, SHOWING INPUT, OUTPUT, AND CARRYOVER<br />

Five Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 1968<br />

GROSS '<br />

LOAD<br />

L6,5.27- .I 12,816<br />

1965.<br />

__FY<br />

INTAKE<br />

1966<br />

FY<br />

NAKE<br />

6,687<br />

FY_1967<br />

INTAKE<br />

7,528<br />

1968<br />

_F.<br />

INTAKE<br />

11,428<br />

15,330 NON-REHAB<br />

CARRYOVER"<br />

6,289<br />

CARRYOVER<br />

7,707<br />

CARRYOVER<br />

8,643<br />

CLO En<br />

REHAB<br />

1,355<br />

./<br />

3,754<br />

REHAB<br />

/ 1,478<br />

CLOSED t,<br />

-<br />

REHAB<br />

/ 1,564<br />

CLOSED<br />

LOAD<br />

GROSS<br />

20,045<br />

8,114<br />

CARRYOVER<br />

8,617<br />

CARRYOVER<br />

12,093<br />

to FY 69<br />

[ 2,000 cases 83<br />

'1<br />

CLOSED<br />

7,025<br />

5,652<br />

REHAB<br />

/1,957<br />

5,068<br />

NON-REHAB<br />

REHAB<br />

1,855<br />

NON-REHAB<br />

6,097<br />

gross load is the sum<br />

*The<br />

closures and carryover<br />

of<br />

the year; it is alsothe<br />

for<br />

of intake for the year<br />

sum<br />

plus carryover from prior year.


with mental or nervous conditions accounted for 7.7 percent<br />

Persons<br />

the number in the survey sample. The sample included very few<br />

of<br />

retarded or alcoholics. It included only those who were<br />

mentally<br />

institutionalized and whose ages ranged from 17 through 64.<br />

not<br />

was estimated from the survey findings that 8,633,000 persons<br />

It<br />

the United States had one or more chronic conditions with limi-<br />

in<br />

in the amount or kind of major activity that could be per-<br />

tation<br />

or inability to carry on major activity. This total less<br />

formed<br />

percent amounts to 7,968,259. Percent distribution by dis-<br />

7.7<br />

age and race is presented in the adjoining table.<br />

ability,<br />

more recent survey of the prevalence of disability and<br />

A<br />

economic impact was undertaken by the Social Security Adminis-<br />

its<br />

in 1966 and a summary of the survey findings was reported<br />

tration<br />

Haber (1968) 1.<br />

by<br />

survey work was carried out for the Social Security<br />

The<br />

by the Bureau of the Census. The nationwide survey<br />

Administration<br />

a sample of all non-institutionalized persons aged 18<br />

included<br />

64. The data were based on self-evaluation of work limita-<br />

through<br />

tions as in the National HealthSurvey previously.cited..<br />

in the Social Security Survey was defined as a<br />

Disability<br />

in thekind or amount of work (or housework)that could be<br />

limitation<br />

which resulted from a chronic condition or impairment last-<br />

performed<br />

three months or longer. The extent of incapacity ranged from<br />

ing<br />

to perform any kind of.Work to secondary limitations in<br />

inability<br />

amount or kind of work performed. Data on employment and func-<br />

the<br />

capacities were collected to further evaluate the nature and<br />

tional<br />

of disability.<br />

severity<br />

to this survey, 17.8 million non-institutional-<br />

According<br />

adults aged 18-64 were limited in ability to work because of<br />

ized<br />

chronic condition for a period of six months or longer. In<br />

some<br />

to reduce the uncertainty of prognosisduring the early stages<br />

order<br />

the disability, the data were presented only for persons disabled<br />

of<br />

than six months (an additional 400,000 had been disabled three<br />

more<br />

months or more).<br />

estimated prevalence of disability reported was twice<br />

The<br />

high as that reported by the National Center for Health Statistics<br />

as<br />

(17.8 million versus 8,633,000).<br />

Disability<br />

io<br />

and Income Maintenance: Prevalence Disabilit_ff.<br />

Work<br />

Lawrence W. Haber, Social Security Bulletin U. S. Department<br />

1966.<br />

Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration,<br />

of<br />

1968.<br />

May,<br />

84


number and percent distribution of persons with limitation of activity, by selected chronic conditions<br />

Average<br />

limitation according to degree of limitation: United States, July 1963-June 1965<br />

causing<br />

based household interviews of the civili,,n, noninstitutiona! population. The survey design, general qualifications, and information the reliability ofte estimates<br />

[Dta<br />

in ppendix 1. Definitions of terms given in Appendix Ill<br />

given<br />

chronic<br />

Selected<br />

conditions<br />

limited in<br />

Persons<br />

activity<br />

All<br />

With<br />

limitation,<br />

degrees<br />

ac- but<br />

of<br />

in<br />

tlvlty<br />

not<br />

limitation<br />

Average<br />

major<br />

actlvltyl<br />

22,583 6,114<br />

all forms--- 148 31<br />

tuberculosis,<br />

neoplasms 260 35<br />

alignant<br />

and unspecified<br />

Benign<br />

227 60<br />

neoplasms<br />

fever 1,152 415<br />

ksthma-hay<br />

571 122<br />

Diabetes<br />

and<br />

ental<br />

1,767 429<br />

conditions<br />

conditions 3,619 652<br />

Heart<br />

without heart<br />

Hypertension<br />

1,369 314<br />

involvement<br />

veins 535 161<br />

aricose<br />

243 54<br />

Hemorrhoids<br />

conditions of<br />

Dther<br />

system 758 176<br />

circulatory<br />

sinusitis and<br />

3hronic<br />

621 204<br />

bronchitis<br />

conditions of<br />

Dther<br />

system 501 87<br />

respiratory<br />

ulcer 550 123<br />

Peptic<br />

556 91<br />

Hernia<br />

conditions Of<br />

)ther<br />

system 958 206<br />

digestive<br />

of genito-<br />

3onditlons<br />

system 1,071 304<br />

urinary<br />

and rheumatism-- 3,481 725<br />

Erthritis<br />

diseases of muscles,<br />

3ther<br />

and jointsm 785 234<br />

bones,<br />

impairments 1,285 184<br />

Fisual<br />

impairments 461 97<br />

earing<br />

complete<br />

Paralysis,<br />

923 .118<br />

partial<br />

(except<br />

Impairments<br />

of back<br />

paralysis)<br />

1,769 469<br />

spine<br />

(except pa-<br />

Impairments<br />

and absence) of<br />

ralysis<br />

extremities and<br />

upper<br />

401 92<br />

shoulders<br />

(except pa-<br />

Impairments<br />

and absence) of<br />

ralysis<br />

extremities and<br />

lower<br />

1,325 384<br />

hips<br />

With<br />

limitation<br />

amount<br />

in<br />

kind<br />

or<br />

major<br />

of<br />

activity<br />

to<br />

.Unable<br />

carry<br />

actlvity<br />

number of persons in thousands<br />

12,347<br />

74<br />

iii<br />

127<br />

543<br />

291<br />

923<br />

1,941<br />

836<br />

313<br />

148<br />

371<br />

304<br />

233<br />

313<br />

363<br />

534<br />

562<br />

2,076<br />

466<br />

618<br />

219<br />

361<br />

1,139<br />

258<br />

704<br />

4,122<br />

All<br />

degrees<br />

ac- of<br />

tivity<br />

limitation<br />

i00,0<br />

With<br />

li[tation,<br />

not in<br />

but<br />

or maJ<br />

activity<br />

With<br />

limitation<br />

amount<br />

in<br />

kind<br />

or<br />

major<br />

of<br />

activity<br />

Percent distribution<br />

i00.0<br />

0.7 0,5<br />

44<br />

I. 2 O. 6<br />

114<br />

1.0 1.0<br />

40<br />

5.1 6,8<br />

194<br />

158 2.5 2.0<br />

7.8 7.0<br />

415<br />

16.0 10.7<br />

1,026<br />

6.1 '5.1<br />

219<br />

2,4 2.6<br />

61<br />

41 i,i 0.9<br />

212 3.4 2.9<br />

112 2.7 3.3<br />

2.2 1.4<br />

181<br />

2.4 2.0<br />

114<br />

102 2.5 1.5<br />

218 4.2 3.4<br />

4.7 5.0<br />

205<br />

15.4 11.9<br />

680<br />

3.5 3.8<br />

86<br />

5.7 3.0<br />

483<br />

145 2.0 1.6<br />

444 4.1 1.9<br />

160 7.8 7.7<br />

51 1,8 1.5<br />

237 5.9 6.3<br />

activity refers to ability to work, keep house, or engage in school preschool activities.<br />

iMajor<br />

Of conditions causing limitation may be greater than the number of persons limited because person<br />

Summations<br />

i00.0<br />

0.6<br />

0.9<br />

1.0<br />

4,4<br />

2.4<br />

7.5<br />

15.7<br />

6.8<br />

2,5<br />

1.2<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

1.9<br />

2.5<br />

2.9<br />

4.3<br />

4.6<br />

16.8<br />

3.8<br />

5,0<br />

1.8<br />

2.9<br />

9.2<br />

2.1<br />

5.7<br />

tc<br />

Unable<br />

carry<br />

major<br />

actlvity<br />

than one condition cause of his limitation; the other hand, they may be less because only selected<br />

report<br />

are shown.<br />

conditions<br />

may add to more than I00 because person can report more than condition cause of his limita-<br />

SPercentages<br />

the other hand, they may add to less than i00 because only selected conditions shown.<br />

tion;<br />

Conditions 9g Activity Limitation--Un___it__e_d States, uly 1963<br />

Chronic<br />

1965. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and elfare, Public<br />

une<br />

Health Service, 1969.<br />

85<br />

IO0.C<br />

i.I<br />

2.8<br />

1.0<br />

4,7<br />

3.8<br />

i0.i<br />

24.9<br />

5.3<br />

1,5<br />

1.0<br />

5.1<br />

2,7<br />

4.4<br />

2.8<br />

2.5<br />

5.3<br />

5.0<br />

16.5<br />

2.1<br />

11.7<br />

3.5<br />

10.8<br />

3.9<br />

1.2<br />

5.7


difference is attributed largely to differences in<br />

The<br />

for indentification rather than criteria for defining dis-<br />

procedures<br />

The disability criteria in the 1966 study differ only in<br />

ability.<br />

to women. The 1966 survey included housework as well as<br />

reference<br />

limitations regardless of present activity or status since it<br />

work<br />

plausible that many disabled women were prevented from entering<br />

was<br />

labor force due to limitation of activity. The National Health<br />

the<br />

(conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics) did<br />

Survey<br />

not take this into account.<br />

the National Health Survey, only those who reported a<br />

In<br />

condition of impairment were asked the questions relating<br />

chronic<br />

disability. Many individuals will report symptoms of disability<br />

to<br />

actually reporting at the outset that they have a disability.<br />

without<br />

in the Social Security Survey was such as to take this<br />

Methodology<br />

into account.<br />

factor<br />

1966 survey was conducted with other changes in meth-<br />

The<br />

The most significant was the use of simple questionnaires<br />

odology.<br />

through the mail to initially identify disabled persons as op-<br />

sent<br />

to the more complicated multiple choice interview schedules<br />

posed<br />

in the National Health Survey, The mail questionnaires were<br />

used<br />

to screen a large sample. The nature, severity and extent of<br />

used<br />

were later verified and refined during an extensive per-<br />

disability<br />

interview with the disabled adult.<br />

sonal<br />

Social Security Survey findings are presented in the<br />

Major<br />

adjoining.<br />

table<br />

Social Security Survey report did not include any break-<br />

The<br />

by disabling condition. However, it is inferred that very few<br />

down<br />

and mentally retarded were included in this survey either<br />

alcoholics<br />

the definition of disability in both surveys was essentially<br />

since<br />

the same.<br />

the National Health Survey as indicated, 7.7 percent of<br />

In<br />

respondents reported nervous or mental condit.ions. The method-<br />

the<br />

utilized in the Social Security Survey probably resulted in<br />

ology<br />

identification of a greater proportion of persons with mental or<br />

the<br />

conditions. In this survey, ii percent of the respondents<br />

nervous<br />

a nervous or mental condition. If Ii percent is subtracted<br />

reported<br />

the Social Security Survey estimate, then this nationwide esti-<br />

from<br />

of physically disabled persons becomes 15,842,000.<br />

mate<br />

is little difference between men and women in the<br />

There<br />

of disability, but among older persons more women than<br />

prevalence<br />

believed that their health prevented them from working. The<br />

men<br />

of occupations is more limited for women and they have less<br />

range<br />

experience and are, therefore, less likely to secure employment.<br />

work<br />

because of family responsibilities and social expectations, are<br />

Men,<br />

more motivated to return to work and make a vocational adjustment.


force and work status by severity of disability and sex: Percentage distribution of<br />

Labor<br />

population aged 18-64 by labor force status, spring 1966<br />

noninstitutlonal<br />

force and<br />

Labor<br />

status<br />

work<br />

TOTAL<br />

(in thou-<br />

Number<br />

sands)<br />

Total percent 4--/.<br />

in labor force<br />

Not<br />

labor force 4.!<br />

In<br />

Employed<br />

time<br />

Full<br />

time<br />

Part<br />

Unemloyed<br />

MEN<br />

(in thou-<br />

Number<br />

sands)<br />

Total percent 4../<br />

in labor force<br />

Not<br />

labor force /<br />

In<br />

Employed.<br />

time<br />

Full<br />

time<br />

Part<br />

Unemployed.<br />

WOMEN<br />

(in thou-<br />

Number<br />

sands)<br />

Total percent 4--/<br />

in labor force<br />

Not<br />

labor force /<br />

In<br />

Employed<br />

time<br />

Full<br />

time<br />

Part<br />

Unemployed<br />

popu-<br />

U.S.<br />

/<br />

lation<br />

(in<br />

thousands)<br />

103,085<br />

I00.0<br />

33.2<br />

66.8<br />

64.4<br />

(51)<br />

(3?)<br />

2.5<br />

48,982<br />

I00,0<br />

9.5<br />

90.5<br />

87.4<br />

(2/)<br />

(S_l)<br />

54,103<br />

I00.0<br />

54.6<br />

45.4<br />

43.5<br />

(21)<br />

(2/)<br />

1.9<br />

Nondls-<br />

/ abled<br />

85,332<br />

I00.0<br />

30.2<br />

69.9<br />

67.8<br />

(51)<br />

(2/)<br />

2.2<br />

40,552<br />

I00.0<br />

6.1<br />

94.0<br />

91.4<br />

(21)<br />

(5/)<br />

2.7<br />

44'779<br />

I00.0<br />

52.0<br />

48.1<br />

46.4<br />

(51)<br />

1.7<br />

Severity of disability 3/<br />

Occupao<br />

Total<br />

Severetlonal<br />

disabled<br />

17,753<br />

I00.0<br />

47.4<br />

52.1<br />

48.0<br />

36.2<br />

11.7<br />

3.9<br />

8,430<br />

I00.0<br />

25.8<br />

73.7<br />

68.3<br />

57.7<br />

10.6<br />

5.2<br />

9,324<br />

I00.0<br />

66.9<br />

32.6<br />

29.6<br />

16.8<br />

12.8<br />

2.9<br />

6,100<br />

I00.0<br />

80.0<br />

19.2<br />

16.3<br />

1.7<br />

14.5<br />

2.9<br />

2,300<br />

I00.0<br />

72.3<br />

26.7<br />

.7 21<br />

4.1<br />

17.6<br />

5.0<br />

3,800<br />

I00.0<br />

84.7<br />

14.7<br />

13.0<br />

.3<br />

12.6<br />

1.6<br />

5,014<br />

I00.0<br />

34.9<br />

65.1<br />

59.4<br />

43.2<br />

16.2<br />

5.3<br />

2,420<br />

I00.0<br />

4.9<br />

! 95.<br />

87.7<br />

72.3<br />

15.4<br />

6.7<br />

2,594<br />

I00.0<br />

62.8<br />

37.2<br />

33.0<br />

16.0<br />

17.0<br />

3.9<br />

Secondary<br />

work<br />

limits<br />

lion<br />

Data from speclal tabulation of Current Population Survey March 1966, U.S. Bureau of the Census.<br />

I/<br />

Includes adults disabled 6 months or less, obtained by subtracting total disabled lonser than 6<br />

/<br />

from the civilian nonlnstitutlonal population aged 18-64.<br />

months<br />

Disabled longer than 6 months.<br />

3/<br />

Includes less than I percent of the dlsabled adults not reporting labor force or work status.<br />

4/<br />

Data for ages 18-64 not available.<br />

5/<br />

Security pr_v_.@y o_f the Disabled: 196_.__6. U.S. Department of Health,<br />

Soci_____a<br />

and Welfarel Social Security Administration, n.d.<br />

Education,<br />

87<br />

6,639<br />

I00.0<br />

26.9<br />

72.6<br />

68.5<br />

62.7<br />

5.8<br />

3,9<br />

3,710<br />

I00.0<br />

10.6<br />

88.9<br />

84.6<br />

81.5<br />

3.1<br />

4.2<br />

2,930<br />

I00.0<br />

47.6<br />

51.9<br />

48.1<br />

38.9<br />

9.3<br />

3.5


of the severity of disability,the disabled had<br />

Regardless<br />

rates of unemployment than the non-disabled.<br />

higher<br />

unemployment rate of disabled men was twice that of<br />

The<br />

men. More than one-fourth of the severely disabled men<br />

non-disabled<br />

in the labor force, but only four percent were employed full-<br />

were<br />

About nine-tenths of the partially disablSd men were in the<br />

time.<br />

force. Disabled women had lower rates of labor force involve-<br />

labor<br />

ment.<br />

table presents an estimate of prevalence for each of<br />

The<br />

sub-groups of the entire population of handicapped individuals.<br />

three<br />

may be argued that all individuals in each group are potential<br />

It<br />

for vocational rehabilitation services regardless of<br />

referrals<br />

of handicap or employment status. Yet, based on Vocational<br />

severity<br />

program experience, it is evident that some handicapped<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

should be screened and not considered for referral because<br />

persons<br />

handicaps are either too severe or too slight for them to bene-<br />

their<br />

fit from services.<br />

information is available at this time which can be used<br />

No<br />

making precise statements ofthe proportions of handicapped persons<br />

in<br />

should at some time be referred for vocational rehabilitation ser-<br />

who<br />

In the absence of such information, it is useful to make tenta-<br />

vices.<br />

but conservative, estimates of these proportions based on state-<br />

tive,<br />

of rationale.<br />

ments<br />

severely disabled population in the Social Security<br />

The<br />

included some who were obviously inappropriate for referral<br />

Survey<br />

any time, because they were too severely handicapped. Yet this<br />

al<br />

is probably small sinceVocational Rheabilitation has,<br />

proportion<br />

fact, been accepting many severelyhandicapped persons for service<br />

in<br />

has been successful in placing them in employment. Furthermore,<br />

and<br />

who were too severely handicapped would at some later time be<br />

some<br />

for referral for various reasons including diminution in<br />

appropriate<br />

of handicap over time and application of improved techniques<br />

severity<br />

rehabilitation. Since the proportion of potential referrals is<br />

of<br />

than i00 percent, but obviously much greater than 50 percent it<br />

less<br />

therefore, conservatively estimated that 75 percent of this popu-<br />

is,<br />

lation can be referred at some time.<br />

occupationally disabled included only those who.were<br />

The<br />

handicapped. There is no reason why all who were in this<br />

moderately<br />

group should not be referred at some time.<br />

with secondary work limitations included some Who<br />

Those<br />

and always will be able to function very well without the benefit<br />

were<br />

vocational rehabilitation services. Yet, there are many who would<br />

of<br />

appropriate for immediate referral because of vocational handicaps<br />

be<br />

a large number who were currently employed at the time of<br />

including<br />

survey. Early referral of handicapped individuals is encouraged<br />

the<br />

88


it has been demonstrated that early intervention with voca-<br />

since<br />

rehabilitation services is relatively more effective. Some<br />

tional<br />

in this group have handicaps that are growing progres-<br />

individuals<br />

worse and they will, therefore, at some future time, be<br />

sively<br />

for referral. These considerations lead to the con-<br />

appropriate<br />

that nationally at least 75 percent of these handicapped<br />

clusion<br />

individuals are potential referrals.<br />

Severely Disabled 6,100,000 x 75% 4,575,000<br />

Occupational Disability 5,014,000 x100% 5,014,000<br />

Secondary Work Limitation 6,639,000 x 75% 4,979,250<br />

ii percent is subtracted from this figure to eliminate<br />

If<br />

with mental or nervous conditions, the estimate is reduced to<br />

those<br />

12,965,742.<br />

national health surveys were not designed for use<br />

These<br />

estimating prevalence of disability in individual states because<br />

in<br />

differences in characteristics of the populations of the various<br />

of<br />

compared with the nation as a whole.<br />

states<br />

some wrk has been done on the development of<br />

However,<br />

state estimates so that National Health Survey data can<br />

synthetic<br />

applied to individual states with some measure of confidence.<br />

be<br />

procedure involves analyses of the characteristics of the popu-<br />

The<br />

of each state so that they may be taken into account in<br />

lation<br />

state estimates of prevalence of disability from National<br />

making<br />

Survey data. It so happens that the characteristics of the<br />

Health<br />

of Washington are not appreciably different from the<br />

population<br />

of the population of the nation ms a whole. Con-<br />

characteristics<br />

it was reported that the percentage of the handicapped<br />

sequently,<br />

population in Washington is the same as for the nation.<br />

is no serious problem presented in making pro-<br />

There<br />

of prevalence in future years since the experience of the<br />

jections<br />

Center for Health Statistics indicates that the rising<br />

National<br />

of some chronic conditions is offset by the declining in-<br />

incidence<br />

of others and the prevalence of all chronic conditions taken<br />

cidence<br />

proves to be a very stable statistic over a period of time.<br />

together<br />

view of the foregoing, it is possible to make a tenta-<br />

In<br />

estimate of the number of physically disabled persons in Wash-<br />

tive<br />

ington in 1975 who should, at some time, be referred for vocational<br />

Disability, Nerived from theNational<br />

Synthetic.StateEstimatesof<br />

U. S. Dept. of Health, Education, andWeifare,<br />

Hal'hhSurvey<br />

Publ Heih Service.<br />

89


services. This estimate is derived from the follow-<br />

rehabilitation<br />

calculations:<br />

ing<br />

number of vocationally handicapped, age 18-64<br />

12,965,742<br />

the United States<br />

in<br />

120,000,000 total number of persons, ages 18-64<br />

10.8%<br />

12,965,742<br />

120,000,000<br />

is the proportion of the population of employable age who are<br />

This<br />

handicapped and potential referrals for vocational rehab-<br />

physically<br />

ilitation services.<br />

is estimated by the Planning and Community Affairs Agency<br />

It<br />

the State of Washington that there will be 2,300,000 persons of<br />

of<br />

employable age (15 through 64) in Washington in 1975.<br />

2,300,000 x 10.8% 248,400 or rounded, 250,000<br />

is the estimate of the total number of physically disabled<br />

This<br />

in Washington who can be considered potential referrals for<br />

persons<br />

vocational rehabilitation services as of 1975.<br />

is evidence that. twice as many individuals not phys-<br />

There<br />

disabled can be considered potential referrals for vocational<br />

ically<br />

services as of 1975. Thus, 750,000 people are potential<br />

rehabilitation<br />

for VocationalRehabilitation services in Washington State<br />

referrals<br />

1975. This many people are likely to be able to meet the eligi-<br />

in<br />

requirements presently inthe law.<br />

bility<br />

is very little, information in the literature on the<br />

There<br />

of disability. As indicated, some chronic conditions have<br />

incidence<br />

incidence and for others the incidence is declining. The<br />

arising<br />

for purposes of estimating.vocational rehabilitation need<br />

objective<br />

to estimate the incidence in relationship to the prevalence of<br />

is<br />

physical disability among those of employable age in Washing-<br />

chronic<br />

ton who are potential referrals for vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation caseload statistics<br />

Analysisof<br />

that a majority of physically disabled clients served fall<br />

suggests<br />

a 20 year age range at the time of referral. Furthermore,<br />

within<br />

incidence of physical disability as a proportion of prevalence<br />

the<br />

with age and a large number of clients served by Vocational<br />

increases<br />

fall in the older age range. Therefore, it is estimated<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

the incidence of potential referrals to Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

that<br />

a one-year period is at least 1/20th or five percent of the<br />

during<br />

prevalence.<br />

90


x 5% 12,500 The estimate of the number of non-institu-<br />

250,000<br />

physically disabled persons<br />

tionalized<br />

Washington who should be referred for<br />

in<br />

services during the year 1975<br />

vocational<br />

x 5% 25,000 The estimate of the number of other dis-<br />

500,000<br />

persons in WaShington who should<br />

abled<br />

referred forvocational rehabilitation<br />

be<br />

during the year 1975<br />

services<br />

is, in addition, a substantial number of institutionalized<br />

There<br />

hospitalized) physically disabled persons who should also be re-<br />

(or<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation has been receiving some referrals<br />

ferred.<br />

general hospitals, VA hospitals and TB hospitals. It is expected<br />

from<br />

the number of referrals from hospitals will sharply increase be-<br />

that<br />

1969and 1975.<br />

tween<br />

rate of caseload turnover is expected to continue. The<br />

This<br />

to be referred in 1975 will be about equal to the number to be<br />

number<br />

(assuming the point of saturation is reached). Therefore, those<br />

closed<br />

enter the caseload (i.e., are referred for VR services) will com-<br />

who<br />

about fifty percent of the total number served. The number to<br />

prise<br />

referred is half of the number to be served and this figure (esti-<br />

be<br />

number of referrals) must be doubled in order to establish an<br />

mated<br />

of the nUmber of physically disabled persons to be served.<br />

estimate<br />

The estimated number of potential referrals is 37,500.<br />

x 2 25,000 The estimate of the number of physically<br />

12,500<br />

persons in Washington who should<br />

disabled<br />

receive VR services during, the year 1975<br />

x 2 50,000 The estimate of the number of other dis-<br />

25,000<br />

persons in Washington who should<br />

abled,<br />

receive VR .services during the year 1975.<br />

potential clients of Vocational Rehabilitation are<br />

The<br />

as prevalent in groups other than these physically disabled<br />

twice<br />

It has been stated that the mentally ill comprise a large<br />

persons.<br />

of our total population, perhaps i0 percent. Alcoholics are<br />

segment<br />

by some authors to have a genetic, metabolic illness, and<br />

considered<br />

some other authors to have a mental illness. Either way, no matter<br />

by<br />

the ideology of the ailment, our state has a great problem with<br />

what<br />

There is general agreement that Washington State has at<br />

alcoholics.<br />

i00,000 adults who are incapacitated because of alcoholism.<br />

least<br />

part of the population of the mentally ill and the alcoholics<br />

Only<br />

be helped by rehabilitation services now available. It is so<br />

can<br />

to society to rehabilitate those who can be helped that great<br />

useful<br />

should be made in this direction. The mentallyretarded, the<br />

effort<br />

offenders, the socially disadvantaged,are now fruitfully<br />

public<br />

being served by Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

91


potential clients in these groups of people who are<br />

The<br />

physically handicapped--the mentally ill, the alcoholics, mental<br />

not<br />

public offenders, the socially disadvantaged--are about<br />

retardates,<br />

that of those who are physically disabled. This relationship<br />

twice<br />

documented carefully in the Final Report, Comprehensive Statewide<br />

is<br />

for Vocational Rehabilitation Services,'Wisconsin, June 30,<br />

Planning<br />

1968, William Sather, Ph.D., Project Administrator.<br />

Poverty<br />

President Johnson in the ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE<br />

Former<br />

(1964)stated that, "The poor, and the children of the<br />

PRESIDENT<br />

are handicapped by illness and disability that could be<br />

poor,<br />

Largely as a result of the ill health that grows out of<br />

avoided.<br />

we rank below many other countries in the conquest of the<br />

poverty,<br />

and maternal mortality, in average life expectancy and nutri-<br />

infant<br />

We must speed and intensify our.efforts to make good health<br />

tion.<br />

accessible to the poor." In that report it is pointed out that<br />

more<br />

percent of Nonwhite families are poor. The President called for<br />

44<br />

direct action in order to.eradicate the menace of poverty.<br />

quick<br />

commonly occurring phrase in his report is "illness. and disability<br />

A<br />

could be avoided." Former President Johnson called for pre-<br />

that<br />

measures,-as well as curative measures. President Nixon's<br />

ventive<br />

statements and those of his Secretary of Health, Education,<br />

public<br />

and Welfare repeat this concern and specify recommended activity.<br />

rehabilitation agencies, under the coordination<br />

Vocational<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation, must assume responsibility in the area<br />

of<br />

prevention as well as the area of treatment. Martin Dishart,<br />

of<br />

the study of the prevalence of disability of Maryland recommended<br />

in<br />

"factors of economic need be considered for statewide program<br />

that<br />

as well as how the very poor.might be better protected from<br />

planning<br />

which seem to hit them the hardest." All persons deserve<br />

disabilities<br />

protection from ill-health. The effort must be greater for<br />

equal<br />

and/or racial minorities since their exposure to poor health<br />

poor<br />

is much greater.<br />

conditions<br />

persons, who are emotionally or psychologically dis-<br />

Poor<br />

are in great need of vocational rehabilitation services, as<br />

abled<br />

those who are physically disabled. Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

are<br />

best help all poor personswho have become psychologically handi-<br />

can<br />

as well as physically handicapped, by training them for mean-<br />

capped,<br />

remunerative employment, by financing the education that they<br />

ingful,<br />

for these are the inroads to success in our society; the inroads<br />

need,<br />

which these people have been deprived. It might be argued that<br />

of<br />

of these people do not qualify for vocational rehabilitation<br />

many<br />

because they have become chronically unemployable. If<br />

services,<br />

disability is to be preyented and if the problem of wasted<br />

future<br />

resources is to be overcome, the culturally disadvantaged<br />

human<br />

must be served well by vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

92


the problem of poverty is .not met head on, the rate of psycho-<br />

If<br />

as well as physical, disability will continue to increase.<br />

logical,<br />

child from a poor family is more likely to live in poverty as an<br />

A<br />

and is consequently more likely to be disabled. Disability<br />

adult<br />

the next adult generation can and must be avoided. If we can<br />

in<br />

all people with adequate education, vocational training,<br />

provide<br />

and sufficient income, the figures of disability pre-<br />

employment<br />

in this report can be greatly reduced.<br />

sented<br />

Prevention of Disability<br />

humanitarian and practical reasons, prevention needs to<br />

For<br />

an integral part of the ongoing vocational rehabilitation pro-<br />

become<br />

Great effort must be directed toward preventing unborn chil-<br />

gram.<br />

as well as young children, from being exposed to the environ-<br />

dren,<br />

conditions that lead to disability. The elimination of un-<br />

mental<br />

and under-employment, as well as adequate educational<br />

employment<br />

for the poor, is a most *ital preventive measure. If<br />

experiences<br />

disabled population continues to increase, vocational rehabili-<br />

the<br />

services cannot keep the. pace. The disabled population must<br />

tation<br />

not increase. Provide rehabilitation services to poor<br />

decrease,<br />

today, and the number of disabled persons, as well as the<br />

people<br />

of people-living below the poverty level, will be less to-<br />

number<br />

morrow.<br />

in Seattle, the Division of Vocational Rehab-.<br />

Fortunately,<br />

has established a Central Area office, and an office in<br />

ilitation<br />

Multipurpose State Office, which service almost exclusively res-<br />

the<br />

of the inner-city area. Most of their clients are not phys-<br />

idents<br />

handicapped but handicapped by the effects of being a racial<br />

ically<br />

poor, and unemployed or under-employed. This office is<br />

monority,<br />

a vital and refreshing role in confronting the problems that<br />

playing<br />

been presented above. There is a need for more such offices<br />

have<br />

Seattle, other metropolitan centers and rural areas in<br />

throughout<br />

State of Washington. This need is reflected in the budget re-<br />

the<br />

to the 41stState Legislature by the Governor and the Central<br />

quest<br />

Agency.<br />

Budget<br />

state has a special responsibility to try to rehabili-<br />

The<br />

those who are wholly or partly dependent on it and/or one of<br />

tate<br />

political subdivisions. We thus intend to have greatly expanded<br />

its<br />

for potential clients of vocational rehabilitation who are<br />

services<br />

by the state institutions. The following discussion of voca-<br />

served<br />

rehabilitation in the state institutions was prepared in part<br />

tional<br />

Andrea Ayers and Joseph Lurie, consultants to the Planning Com-<br />

by<br />

for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

mission<br />

93


State Institutions<br />

Department of Institutions of the State of Washington<br />

The<br />

the responsibility to provide institutional care and<br />

has<br />

for the blind, the deaf, the mentally retarded,<br />

treatment<br />

mentally ill, juvenile delinquents,'adult offenders<br />

the<br />

disabled veterans. To carry out this program there<br />

and<br />

two training schools for the blind and the deaf, three<br />

are<br />

hospitals, four schools for the mentally retarded,<br />

mental<br />

institutions for the juvenile delinquents, seven insti-<br />

ii<br />

for adult offenders and two homes for disabled<br />

tutions<br />

In addition to these institutions, the Depart-<br />

veterans.<br />

alsoprovides assistance for persons at 22 child<br />

ment<br />

centers, supervises juveniles on parole and ex-<br />

guidance<br />

consultation services for delinquency prevention.<br />

tends<br />

financial assistance and consultation are provided<br />

Also,<br />

12 day care centers for the mentally retarded. In the<br />

for<br />

fiscal year, the averagedaily institutional and<br />

1966<br />

parole population receiving services was 14,893.<br />

all institutions the goal is to train.or rehabilitate<br />

In<br />

patients or inmates to such an extent that they can<br />

the<br />

satisfactory adjustment which will permit them to<br />

make<br />

to the community. Obviously, there are many dis-<br />

return<br />

persons who have been in the institutions for a<br />

abled<br />

period of time and will probably never be able to<br />

long<br />

but most of the admissions can be released after<br />

leave,<br />

treatment if adequate staff and facilities are<br />

receiving<br />

A great deal of progress has been made in recent<br />

provided.<br />

in the development of effective treatment programs,<br />

years<br />

but much remains to be done.<br />

concerning institutions which is included in<br />

Information<br />

report has been taken from the December, 1966 State of Washington<br />

this.<br />

of Institutions Factual Analysis Concerning:. Progrs Per-<br />

Department<br />

Expenditures, Population Trends Length of Stay and Recidivism.<br />

sonnel<br />

above two paragraphs were taken from the preface of the Department<br />

The<br />

Institutions publication.<br />

of<br />

Adult Corrections<br />

crime rate in Washington, measured by the F.B.I. Crime<br />

The<br />

has increased thirty percent compared with a nine precent popu-<br />

Index,<br />

lation increase during the past five years.<br />

daily population within adult correctional institu-<br />

Average<br />

has increased 35.3 percent during the past three years and is<br />

tions<br />

expected to continue to rise.<br />

94


the inmate is 18-30 years old and of average in-<br />

Typically<br />

but lacks in academic achievement and work skills. The<br />

telligence,<br />

do not meet American Correctional Association's stand-<br />

institutions<br />

concerning availability of clinical services. The penitentiary<br />

ards<br />

caseloads are twice the minimum working standard recom-<br />

counselor<br />

Wonderful new facilities have been built at great costs to<br />

mended.<br />

able to have humane treatment of prisoners. This is a goal man-<br />

be<br />

by the Governor, the State Legislature, and the Department of<br />

dated<br />

Institutions.<br />

State Hospitals<br />

admissions have increased 57 percent during the<br />

Although<br />

decade, there has been a marked reduction in the rate of growth<br />

past<br />

the number of admissions to the state hospitals since 1964. As<br />

in<br />

population for the state is increasing rapidly, the slow rate<br />

the<br />

growth in the number of annual admissions in recent years is<br />

of<br />

as a temporary phenomenon, or the result of increased use of<br />

viewed<br />

community mental health clinics.<br />

1958, the resident population of the state mental<br />

Since<br />

has been reduced by one-half, even though the number of<br />

hospitals<br />

admissions has nearly doubled. Yet, there has also been an<br />

annual<br />

readmission rate, reflecting the lack of community facil-<br />

increased<br />

available which provide assistance to the former mental pa-<br />

ities<br />

In 1964, Washington had the lowest per capita expenditure<br />

tient.<br />

community treatment resources for the mentally ill of any state.<br />

for<br />

situation is better now.<br />

The<br />

percent of the admissions to state mental hospitals<br />

Forty<br />

in the 20-39 age bracket. Less than half of all persons had<br />

were<br />

high school, only one-fifth had some type of vocational<br />

completed<br />

and 70 percent of admissions in 1965 had incomes of $4000<br />

training,<br />

Thirty-one percent were housewife or housekeeper for their<br />

orless.<br />

family.<br />

own<br />

Menta I Retarda ton<br />

fiscal year 1966 the four state institutions for the<br />

In<br />

retarded served an average daily resident population.of<br />

mentally<br />

persons. Yet, the four state schools for the mentally retarded<br />

4,110<br />

only a small proportion of all potentially retarded persons<br />

service<br />

in the general population of the state.<br />

have usually assumed, though sometimes with<br />

Authorities<br />

that about three percent of the generalpopulatlon in<br />

reservations,<br />

the United States is mentally retarded to some degree.<br />

95


on statewide population estimates, the total number<br />

Based<br />

mentally retarded persons in Washington will increase from 93,200<br />

of<br />

1965 to 101,700 in 1970 and to 111,600 in 1975. In King County<br />

in<br />

for 1965, there were an estimated 30,722 mentally retarded<br />

alone,<br />

individuals.<br />

40 percent of the residents in institutions for the<br />

About<br />

retarded were under 20 years of age in 1965. Both institu-<br />

mentally<br />

and community programs are largely designed for younger per-<br />

tional<br />

who may potentially achieve greater success in treatment, train-<br />

sons<br />

and other rehabilitative programs than retardates in older age<br />

ing,<br />

groups.<br />

Juvenile De linquency<br />

available statistics indicate that the level of<br />

Latest<br />

referrals for delinquency remained at a higher level than that<br />

court<br />

the nation as a whole since 1957. In 1964, there were 344 re-<br />

for<br />

for delinquency per i0,000 juveniles aged i0 through 17 in<br />

ferrals<br />

while for the United States there were 236 referrals per<br />

Washington,<br />

juveniles among the same age group.<br />

I0,000<br />

average daily population of Washington's juvenile re-<br />

The<br />

facilities has risen every year since fiscal 1956. It<br />

habilitation<br />

increased from 344 in fiscal 1955 to 1,006 in fiscal 1966, a<br />

has<br />

gain of 192 percent. During the entire period sinne fiscal<br />

total<br />

the institutional population has exceeded the total capacity<br />

1956,<br />

the institutions. The institutions have been almost continually<br />

of<br />

despite repeated additions to capacity and severe<br />

overpopulated,<br />

in the average length of stay since fiscal 1963. As the<br />

reductions<br />

length of stay decreases, the .assistance that can be pro-<br />

average<br />

for the individual also decreases. Few of these people have<br />

vided<br />

referred to Vocational Rehabilitation in the past. They must<br />

been<br />

referred for help in the future.<br />

be<br />

caseload has increased from 1462 in fiscal year<br />

Average<br />

to 2,350 in fiscal 1966, for an average annual increase of<br />

1960<br />

i0.i percent. It is estimated that the average daily caseload<br />

about<br />

rise from the 2,350 seen in .fiscal year 1966 to 2,850 in fiscal<br />

will<br />

It is hoped these improved methods of treatment for those<br />

1969.<br />

young people will change this gloomy picture.<br />

disabled<br />

may be significant that the period when average length<br />

It<br />

stay was rising (or stabliized at about ii months) overlaps the<br />

of<br />

when the recidivism rate dropped from 30.3 percent (for<br />

period<br />

year 1959) to 23.5 percent (for fiscalyear 1962). Since<br />

fiscal<br />

fiscal 1962, recidivism has shown a tendency to rise.<br />

96


atio of males to females has remained close to three<br />

The<br />

one. With the exception of 1964, the median age of committed<br />

to<br />

has varied little from 15.5 years fo both males and fe-<br />

juveniles<br />

males.<br />

Sensory Handicapped<br />

State of Washington is served by a school for the blind<br />

The<br />

one for the deaf. Their principal purpose is to educate appro-<br />

and<br />

handicapped students, both academically and vocationally,<br />

priately<br />

a specialized residential program so they may return to the<br />

through<br />

community as independent, useful and productive citizens.<br />

school for the blind is operatingat full capacity.<br />

The<br />

average daily population for 1966 wasf28, changing little from<br />

The<br />

years. Of the present enrollment at the school, 52.2 per-<br />

previous<br />

of the students were male, while 47..8 percent were female.<br />

cent<br />

length of attendance for the students enrolled at the end of<br />

Median<br />

current school term was 2-1/2 years. More than half of the stu-<br />

.the<br />

dents leaving the school complete, the course of training.<br />

average population for the school for the deaf stood<br />

The<br />

307 for fiscal 1966. At the close of the 1966 year, there were 197<br />

at<br />

and 112 females. Students range in age from four to 21 with<br />

males<br />

percent in the five to nine year old group. The median length<br />

48.9<br />

attendance at the school is three years, two months, and the major-<br />

of<br />

of the students discharged at the end of the school term complete<br />

ity<br />

their courses of training.<br />

blind and deaf children are now being served in public<br />

Both<br />

in this state. The services offered them in their home<br />

schools<br />

communities' private non-profit agencies are the best in the country.<br />

Washington State Child Guidance Centers are established<br />

"The<br />

community outpatient clinics to provide treatment for the emotional<br />

as<br />

behavioral problems of children and their families. The basic<br />

and<br />

principle is that professional assistance provided for<br />

underlying<br />

when problems first arise will prevent and correct situa-<br />

families<br />

which could result in more serious problems, improving the<br />

tions<br />

potential for achieving satisfactory social and emotional<br />

child's<br />

maturity."<br />

offered by the Child Guidance Centers have been<br />

Services<br />

yet still are not entirely sufficient to satisfy increas-<br />

expanded,<br />

public demand. In spite of increases in caseloads of the social<br />

ing<br />

it has been necessary to establish a waiting list for those<br />

workers,<br />

desiring services during those periods when the Guidance<br />

persons<br />

operating at capacity.<br />

Centers.are<br />

97


fiscal year 1958 through 1966, 8,495 cases have been<br />

From<br />

The number of cases served rose from 765 in fiscal year<br />

served.<br />

to 1,677 in 1966; while the number of cases closed rose from<br />

1968<br />

to 1,219.<br />

450<br />

fiscal year 1966, the mean number of cases on the<br />

During<br />

list was 382 each month, or approximately equivalent to two-<br />

waiting<br />

thirds of an additional social worker caseload per center.<br />

education classes in the public schools are help-<br />

Special<br />

many more of these disturbed children than in the past.<br />

ing<br />

Veterans Facilities<br />

has two State Veterans' Institutions and one<br />

Washington<br />

Colony which provide domicilliary and/or nursing care for in-<br />

Home<br />

digent, honorably discharged veterans..<br />

average population of these three residencies has re-<br />

The<br />

steady for the past five years, and it can be expected to<br />

mained<br />

fairly constant. For fiscal year 1966 the average was 676.<br />

remain<br />

median age for all residents is presently 72.2 years, although<br />

The<br />

new members entering the homes are likely to be somewhat older.<br />

has been included on institutions in this re-<br />

Information<br />

because they serve a rehabilitative function, and because there<br />

port<br />

at present a need for increased personnel in many of the state's<br />

is<br />

On the following page is material concerning people<br />

institutions.<br />

working age (16-60) discharged annually from Washington State<br />

of<br />

Many of these people will be considered vocationally<br />

Institutions.<br />

and will require further services to encourage their suc-<br />

disabled,<br />

rehabilitation.<br />

cessful<br />

material on the next page was provided by Audrey<br />

The<br />

Ph.D., Research Administrator, Department of Institutions,<br />

Holiday,<br />

July 12, 1968.<br />

98


OF WORKING AGE (16-60) DISCHARGED<br />

PEOPLE<br />

FROM WASHINGTON STATE INSTITUTIONS<br />

ANNUALLY<br />

* Adult Corrections<br />

** Juvenile Rehabilitation<br />

*** Mental Hospitals<br />

**** Mental Retardation<br />

All Institutions<br />

1965 1966 1967<br />

1,104 1,251 1,552<br />

811 839 891<br />

3,606 3,489 3,413<br />

160(Est) 165(Est) 200(Est)<br />

5,681 5,744 6,056<br />

A release in Adult Corrections refers to inmates released<br />

*<br />

parole and discharged.<br />

to<br />

A release in Juvenile Rehabilitation refers to persons<br />

**<br />

to parole and direct discharge.<br />

released<br />

A release in Mental Health refers to discharges or moves<br />

***<br />

terminal leave.<br />

to<br />

Arelease in Mental Retardation includes those discharged<br />

****<br />

put on placement.<br />

or<br />

99


Imp l i ca ti ons<br />

seek to determine how many handicapped persons there<br />

Why<br />

in Washington? If we are to provide all handicapped persons<br />

are<br />

rehabilitation services by 1975, we must have the facilities<br />

with<br />

the personnel to do the job. In order to do'what is necessary,<br />

and<br />

the need must be clearly demonstrated.<br />

Why the Need?<br />

results which have been presented in this report indicate<br />

The<br />

Washington is currently not meeting the needs of its handicapped<br />

that<br />

Washington is a growing state. The rapid influx of persons<br />

citizens.<br />

all over the United States, especially into the Puget Sound metro-<br />

from<br />

area, is accelerating the overall population growth of the<br />

politan<br />

Similarly, the number of disabled persons in the state is<br />

state.<br />

to increase. If the goal of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />

likely<br />

Rehabilitation, the provision of rehabilitation services to<br />

tional<br />

disabled persons by 1975, is to be realized, the state's rehabili-<br />

all<br />

services will also have to increase.<br />

tation<br />

of persons rahabilicaCed per 100,000 population, by as£on and scare; and rank<br />

Number<br />

stae, 1964-1968<br />

by<br />

Rehabilitated per i00,000 H<br />

Region<br />

[l- popular:ion 1/ -- R,ank<br />

and<br />

is rounded nearest whole number, based the astimaed total popula£on of Juy i, for each fiscal<br />

Race<br />

Bureau of the Census: Seriea P-25.<br />

year.<br />

Adequacy of Current Services<br />

important question which must be answered before attempt-<br />

An<br />

to plan for the expansion of rehabilitation services to the year<br />

ing<br />

is to what degree are the needs of the present handicapped popu-<br />

1975<br />

being met? If we are currently providing all needy.handicapped<br />

lation<br />

with an adequate rehabilitation program, then it is a fairly<br />

citizens<br />

task to compute what will be needed by 1975. However, the<br />

simple<br />

complicated by the fact that only 8 percent of the disabled<br />

taskis<br />

has ever been to an office of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

population<br />

while 45 percent of that population has not even heard of Vocational<br />

i00


(DVR) which is now the state coordinating agency<br />

rehabilitation<br />

vocational rehabilitation services. The majority of handi-<br />

for<br />

persons in every state have never received vocational rehab-<br />

capped<br />

from the Vocational Rehabilitation state agency.<br />

ilitation<br />

barest minimum estimate of the number of disabled<br />

The<br />

eligible for vocational rehabilitation services in the<br />

persons<br />

of Washington is90,000. Comparing these figures with statis-<br />

state<br />

in the CASELOAD STATISTICS, STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

tics<br />

1968, of the U. S. Department of Health, Education, and<br />

AGENCIES,<br />

we find that in 1968, 1,619 disabled persons were reported<br />

Welfare,<br />

having been rehabilitated, Washington ranks 49th among the 50<br />

as<br />

in numbers rehabilitated per i00,000 population. (Depart-<br />

states<br />

of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1968) The difference be-<br />

ment<br />

the minimum estimate of disabled persons in the state, who<br />

tween<br />

in need of vocational rehabilitation services, and the number<br />

are<br />

by the State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />

rehabilitated<br />

the gap between what is needed and what is offered.<br />

illustrates<br />

of Washington's citizens in need of vocational rehabili-<br />

Thousands<br />

tation cannot be served.<br />

of the 45 percent of the disabled persons who have<br />

What<br />

heard of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation? Only 41<br />

not<br />

of the disabled in one study said they had been helped.<br />

percent<br />

minimum estimate of the number of disabled persons eligible for<br />

The<br />

in need of vocational rehabilitation in Washington is 90,000.<br />

and<br />

the Washington State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Could<br />

the rehabilitation plans of an additional 90,000 dis-<br />

coordinate<br />

persons? It is very unlikely in light of the fact that more<br />

abled<br />

12,093 persons who were referred by June 1968, werelwaiting<br />

than<br />

be helped at the end of the fiscal year.- A vast expansion of<br />

to<br />

rehabilitation services is an immediate need, or the<br />

vocational<br />

of unhelped people will continue to multiply. The problem<br />

backlog<br />

continue to grow and human resources will continue to be<br />

will<br />

As the problem increases, it will become more difficult<br />

wasted.<br />

handle. This is true in the case of the overall number of dis-<br />

to<br />

persons in the state, as well as with the individual disabled<br />

abled<br />

person.<br />

..<br />

ReSion<br />

and<br />

$., tot@l<br />

U.<br />

totl<br />

General,<br />

Blind, total<br />

Washineton<br />

Blind<br />

Washington<br />

1968<br />

Rehabill<br />

tated Sarvsd<br />

680,415<br />

207,918<br />

654138<br />

200.246<br />

26.277<br />

7,672<br />

6827<br />

1,619<br />

536<br />

143<br />

g67<br />

!lhab1- Rehabli£-<br />

tared Sjrved<br />

2O +<br />

2O +<br />

19 +<br />

20 +<br />

+ 34<br />

+<br />

+7<br />

$<br />

I01<br />

6<br />

964<br />

tared Served<br />

74 + 70<br />

+<br />

74 + + 7i<br />

63 + 47<br />

+ 70<br />

35<br />

78<br />

+165<br />

Rehabl£-<br />

Served<br />

tsted<br />

+4<br />

+8<br />

+146<br />

+160<br />

• i0 + 84<br />

69 + 66<br />

I$'6<br />

+<br />

+173


has shown that the longer people remain unpro-<br />

Research<br />

the longer and more difficult it is to restore them to<br />

ductive,<br />

that is why, for example, the trend is to accelerate<br />

productivity;<br />

rehabilitation process for cardiac patients. It is known that<br />

the<br />

individuals who have suffered heart attacks ever return to<br />

few<br />

if they have not done so within a year afte the onset of their<br />

work<br />

Speedy rehabilitation is a preventive measure. Those dis-<br />

attack.<br />

individuals who have to wait for services are not being helped<br />

abled<br />

impeded. Delay in the rehabilitation process, in many instances,<br />

but<br />

the effects of the disability and diminishes the likeli-<br />

intensifies<br />

of success. Approximately 750,000 disabled persons in need of<br />

hood<br />

today are not receiving that help. The task of providing<br />

services<br />

disabled persons in Washington with adequate rehabilitation<br />

all<br />

by 1975 is an immense one.<br />

services<br />

Size of the Conitment<br />

of the goals of the Washington State Vocational<br />

Attainment<br />

Commission requires a total state and federal commitment to<br />

Planning<br />

goals. A special grant will not solve the problem. An experi-<br />

these<br />

or a demonstration program will not solve the problem. What<br />

mental<br />

needed is a vast ongoing human and monetary commitment. The com-<br />

is<br />

must be great, for the problem is an immense one. The pro-<br />

mitment<br />

is one of wasted human resources accompanied by the loss of<br />

blem<br />

dignity and feelings of self-worth. In our society, meaning-<br />

human<br />

employment represents the major path to the attainment of dignity<br />

ful<br />

self-worth. Those who are deprived of that path are deprived of<br />

and<br />

a meaningful, productive life. The solution of this major<br />

leading<br />

will, in 1975, depend upon the depth of our commitment today.<br />

problem<br />

Rehabi li tation ?<br />

undoubtedly, often do not receive the personal<br />

Clients,<br />

that they need, either before or after job placement<br />

attention<br />

Rehabilitation is.generally considered to be reached when<br />

occurs.<br />

client is placed into gainful employment. It is a mistake to view<br />

a<br />

placement as the end of the rehabilitation process. It is re-<br />

job<br />

that an extended follow-up program for some clients be in-<br />

commended<br />

into the ongoing rehabilitation process. Continued coun-<br />

corporated<br />

should be offered to most clients after they have beenplaced<br />

seling<br />

the job, for adjustment to the world of work is often no easy<br />

on<br />

Employment, for many, creates new problems which must be worked<br />

task.<br />

Gainful employment is an important stage in the rehabili-<br />

through.<br />

process, but it does not constitute rehabilitation. Job place-<br />

tation<br />

does not automatically guarantee mental health or the experi-<br />

ment<br />

of feelings of self-worth. Are the 1,619 individuals who were<br />

encing<br />

by the State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

rehabilitated<br />

healthy and self-satisfied, or are they just working? In<br />

mentally<br />

fact, are they still working? A follow-up program designed to answer<br />

102


questions must be an integral part of the rehabilitation pro-<br />

these<br />

for without such a follow-up, it cannot be said that rehabili-<br />

cess,<br />

tation has occurred.<br />

DVR Eligibility Requirements<br />

far, an attempt has been made to illustrate how far<br />

Thus<br />

present program fails to meet the needs of the disabled persons<br />

the<br />

Washington. Now, consider the eligibility requirements of the<br />

in<br />

The recently broadened requirements reflect a national com-<br />

DVR.<br />

toward solving this major problem of wasted human resources.<br />

mitment<br />

the commitment were a strong one, the eligibility requirements<br />

If<br />

be broad, not narrow. One major eligibility requirement is<br />

would<br />

clients must show potential for returning to or entering into<br />

that<br />

employment. If the commitment were strong, rehabilitation<br />

gainful<br />

would aim at uncovering that potential where it is not<br />

services<br />

To reject a person as unqualified for rehabilitation ser-<br />

evident.<br />

is to mark him as unqualified for a productive life. The<br />

vices<br />

cases, the ones who need help the most, too often, are<br />

difficult<br />

away. Those individualswho appear hopeless are labeled<br />

turned<br />

and are rejected as ineligible for rehabilitation services.<br />

"risks"<br />

need to expect more from people for, if we expect less, we will<br />

We<br />

less. Likewise, it must be expected that more services will be<br />

get<br />

to more people if the goal of rehabilitating the State's<br />

extended<br />

disabled population is to be realized.<br />

1969 definition of disability, recognized by the Di-<br />

The<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation, is the kind of commitment that<br />

vision<br />

needed to solve the problem. Presently, those persons who are<br />

is<br />

likely candidateS for vocational rehabilitation services are<br />

most<br />

by some physical or. intellectual deficiency. People who<br />

handicapped<br />

unemployed for other reasons used to be rejected. The services<br />

are<br />

by the "non-disabled" program of the Division of Vocational<br />

provided<br />

represent a step in the direction of helping persons<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

are unemployed for other reasons, such as cultural deprivation.<br />

who<br />

program was a token effort. The psychological and experiential<br />

This<br />

that poverty has on the individual creates a vocational dis-<br />

effects<br />

Chronic unemployment is a vocational disability. Inadequate<br />

ability.<br />

inferior education leads to a vocational disability. Hatred for<br />

and<br />

and race constitutes a devastating vocational handicap.<br />

self<br />

persons are more likely to be physically, as well as<br />

Poor<br />

disabled than are middle class persons. The Divi-<br />

psychologically,<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation could and should provide a greatly<br />

sion<br />

service to persons handicapped by these disabilities. The<br />

needed<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation is struggling to meet the needs<br />

Division<br />

those who qualify (and apply) for services under past standards.<br />

of<br />

broaden the eligibility requirements, as was done in 1968, with<br />

To<br />

current facilities and personnel, will mean adding thousands of<br />

the<br />

more names to the waiting list. This clearly illustrates the scope<br />

103


WHITE<br />

Races, State of Washington.<br />

Nonwhite<br />

State Planning and Community Affairs Agency, 1968<br />

Washington<br />

INCOME,NONWHITE RACIAL GROUPS<br />

MEDIAN<br />

1950 AND 1960<br />

WASHINGTON.<br />

BY SEX: 1960<br />

INCOML:,<br />

INCOME IN DOLLARS<br />

MEDIAN<br />

0 1,000 2,000 3 000 4 000 5 000<br />

4, 82<br />

//////////////////A<br />

1,382<br />

2,839<br />

JAPANESE 4.168<br />

CHINESE<br />

FILIPINO<br />

NEGRO<br />

INDIAN<br />

WHITE<br />

JAPANESE<br />

CHINESE<br />

FILIPINO<br />

NEGRO<br />

INDIAN<br />

m..<br />

1,552<br />

1,526<br />

m 1,402<br />

2,000<br />

2.305<br />

m 2,682<br />

TOTAl POPUlATiON: 1950 AND 1960<br />

NCOMI:,<br />

INCOME IN DOLLARS<br />

MEDIAN<br />

0 l,O00 2.000 3.000<br />

909<br />

1,402<br />

1,826<br />

m 2,305<br />

104<br />

2.839<br />

2,733<br />

2,682<br />

3,008<br />

3,237<br />

TOTAL<br />

1960<br />

F////// 19 s o


the changes and expansion which must be implemented if the goal<br />

of<br />

providing adequate rehabilitation services to all of Washington's<br />

of<br />

disabled persons by 1975 is to be achieved.<br />

most disadvantaged single monority group in Washington<br />

The<br />

is the American Indian. The income of the egro is approxi-<br />

State<br />

3/5 that of the white group in Washington State. The income<br />

mately<br />

the Indian is only approximately 2/5 of the income of the white<br />

of<br />

group. (See. preceding page.)<br />

foregoing presentation documents the thesis that non-<br />

The<br />

races in the State of Washington differ significantly, as well<br />

white<br />

consistently, from one another in terms of the three dimensional<br />

as<br />

of education, occupation, and income. In order to sum-<br />

hierarchies<br />

thelarge volume of detailed data for each of the three di-<br />

marize<br />

into a single numerical index, weighted averages were com-<br />

mensions<br />

on the basis of standardized scores developed by Charles B.<br />

pute<br />

Nam.<br />

of Socioeconomic Status 1960. In order to derive<br />

Profiles<br />

series of comparable, generalized profiles for the various ethnic<br />

a<br />

the raw scores were transformed into percentages. The result-<br />

groups,<br />

data are portrayed graphically in the following table.. There is<br />

ant<br />

distinct separation in the hierarchical position on all three dimen-<br />

a<br />

occupation, and income--between Japanese, Caucasions,<br />

sions--education,<br />

Chinese, on one hand, and Negroes, Filipinos, and Indians, on the<br />

and<br />

The Japanese, with a raw score of 60.3, or a transformed<br />

other.<br />

of 23.2 percent, are far above any other group in educational<br />

score<br />

The corresponding scores for Caucasians are 49.9 and 19.2<br />

status.<br />

for Chinese, 44.0 and 17.Opercent; for Negroes, 39.6 and<br />

percent;<br />

percent; for Filipinos, 33.5 and 12.9 percent; and for Indians,<br />

15.3<br />

and 12.4 percent. Chinese and Japanese, with almost identical<br />

32.1<br />

rank first and second, respectively, in occupational status,<br />

scores,<br />

Caucasians are in third place. The three remaining groups--<br />

and<br />

Filipinos, and Indians--conform to a remarkably consistent<br />

Negroes,<br />

toward the lower end of the scale on all three dimensions.<br />

pattern<br />

indicated previously, Caucasians rank highe@t on income, followed<br />

As<br />

in order by Japanese and Chinese.<br />

I.<br />

B. Nam, M_hod01Ogy and Scores of SOcioeconomic Status,<br />

Charles<br />

Paper No. 15 of the Census, 1963). The computational<br />

(Working<br />

used in deriving the Various scores discussed in this<br />

procedures<br />

are an adaptation of Nam's techniques and weighting sys-<br />

section<br />

to grouped data. The Nam scores for major occupational<br />

tem<br />

educational status, and income were applied to the appro-<br />

groups,<br />

categories of the several minority races. The resultant<br />

priate<br />

represent weighted averages for each dimension of each<br />

scores<br />

The transformed scores for each race are precentages<br />

race.<br />

from the sum of the original scores of each dimension.<br />

derived<br />

105


Races, State of Washington<br />

Nonwhite<br />

State Planning and Community Affairs Agency, 1968<br />

Washington<br />

20<br />

n.<br />

1,5<br />

I-<br />

NONWHITE<br />

PROFILES :<br />

SOCIOECONOMIC<br />

GROUPS,WASHINGTON" 1960<br />

RACIAL<br />

/NEGRO<br />

PERTAIN TO MALE<br />

:DAIA<br />

POPULATION<br />

EDUCATION OCCUPATION INCOME<br />

106


Disabili.t.y<br />

Blind<br />

Rehabilitation services were started in the early<br />

Vocational<br />

They were started in a modest way and in the education agencies<br />

1920s.<br />

state government. Services to the blind were honsidered so special<br />

of<br />

many states that they were provided by separate agencies often in<br />

in<br />

public welfare agency. There has been a trend nationwide to incor-<br />

the<br />

blind rehabilitation services into the agency providing voca-<br />

porate<br />

tional rehabilitation services for all other disability groups.<br />

THE COISSION RECOIENDS:<br />

transfer should be made of vocational rehabilitation<br />

That<br />

of Services to the Blind from the Department of<br />

aspects<br />

Public Assistance to Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

people were once thought of as being unable to be self-<br />

Blind<br />

Even today a blind person is given an extra exemption on<br />

supporting.<br />

income tax. The economic success of many blind people would seem<br />

his<br />

belie this notion of extra handicap. Blind people compete success-<br />

to<br />

in.most economic endeavors today. In fact, the blind people as<br />

fully<br />

group are rehabilitated so successfully that attention has shifted<br />

a<br />

those whose only handicap is blindness. Joseph Hunt, Commissioner,<br />

from<br />

Services Administration of the United States Department<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Health, Education, and Welfare, in an address delivered in July 1968,<br />

of<br />

this to say:<br />

had<br />

are some who have expressed the opinion that serving<br />

There<br />

multi-handicapped blind is idealistic and highly unecon-<br />

the<br />

We do not agree with this pessimistic philosophy.<br />

omical.<br />

are too many examples of individuals who have made it<br />

There<br />

or without our support and encouragement, After all,<br />

with<br />

need only go back 25 years in history to find the same<br />

we<br />

defeatist attitude expressed about the handicap<br />

dogmatic,<br />

blindness alone.<br />

of<br />

statement concerning services to the blind in Washington<br />

A<br />

was provided by the veteran State Supervisor, Services for the<br />

State<br />

Mrs. Valerie Brakel, prior to her retirement in 1968. Her state-<br />

Blind,<br />

follows:<br />

ment<br />

for the Blind is a Unit in the State Department of<br />

Services<br />

Assistance. Two major programs are provided by our<br />

Public<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation and Prevention of Blind-<br />

Agency<br />

We confine our efforts to the visually handicapped.<br />

ness.<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation Program operates under the<br />

The<br />

rules, regulations, and laws as those of the Division<br />

same<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation. Services are. provided on a<br />

of<br />

basis.<br />

statewide<br />

107


estoration services include medical and surgical<br />

Physical<br />

hospitalization; nursing services; convalescent,<br />

treatment;<br />

or rest home care; drugs and supplies; prosthetic<br />

nursing,<br />

dentistry; physical therapy, occupational therapy;<br />

devices;<br />

directed speech or hearing therapy; and psychiatric<br />

medically<br />

treatment.<br />

is provided in accordance with the physical limita-<br />

Training<br />

and vocational aptitudes, interests, and individual<br />

tions<br />

needs.<br />

The Agency provides transportation costs<br />

Transportation.<br />

diagnostic services as well as vocational rehabilitation<br />

for<br />

services.<br />

is provided during the training period and also<br />

Maintenance<br />

placement until the client actually receives<br />

following<br />

remuneration for his employment for a full pay period.<br />

goods and services. The Agency provides guidance,<br />

Other<br />

placement, tools, equipment, initial stock and<br />

counseling,<br />

and occupational licenses to assist the client to<br />

supplies,<br />

in a gainful occupation.<br />

participate<br />

Center. Services for the Blind operates a<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Rehabilitation Center. Approximately 50% of our<br />

Regional<br />

is referred to the Center for diagnostic and<br />

clientele<br />

services.<br />

evaluation<br />

of Blindness involves restoration and conservation<br />

Prevention<br />

vision. One hundred and fifty ophthalmologists participate<br />

of<br />

in the program.<br />

Committees..The Agency has two advisory committees.<br />

Advis.ory<br />

A State AdvisoryCommittee consists of three members<br />

(a)<br />

by the Director of the State Department of Public<br />

appointed<br />

for a three-year period. Its function is to<br />

Assistance<br />

State Services for the Blind and other agencies<br />

coordinate<br />

services to blind individuals. (b) Eye Physicians<br />

providing<br />

Committee. This committee is composed of eight<br />

Advisory<br />

selected on a statewide basis. They serve for a<br />

members<br />

of four years. Each member must be a participating<br />

term<br />

in the Services for the Blind Program. The<br />

ophthalmologist<br />

of this committee is to set standards in the formu-<br />

function<br />

of policies in relation to eye care. The committee<br />

lation<br />

in educational programs, staff development, and the<br />

assists<br />

of information to the public in the field of<br />

dissemination<br />

Prevention of Blindness.<br />

108


Deaf<br />

is now recognized that deafness is a catastrophically<br />

It<br />

condition, particularly for those whose deafness exists from<br />

disabling<br />

Those deaf people who are successful vocationally are most apt<br />

birth.<br />

be in the manual occupations rather than in the professions. Almost<br />

to<br />

deaf students in college are in a college exclusively for the deaf<br />

all<br />

in Washington, D.C. The people who are blind, in contrast to<br />

located<br />

deaf, can usually manage satisfactorily to have college training<br />

the<br />

students without disabilities.<br />

with<br />

has been recommended that federal law be changed so that an<br />

It<br />

who is deaf would have an additional exemption on his income<br />

individual<br />

tax.<br />

Dental Health<br />

many of the applicants for vocational rehabilitation<br />

Very<br />

have a disability plus defective teeth. Routinely, clients<br />

services<br />

vocational rehabilitation services are examined by a physician.<br />

for<br />

is more rare for them to be sent for a dental examination. Poor<br />

It<br />

health is one of the most, common ailments of those in need of<br />

dental<br />

rehabilitation services.<br />

vocational<br />

studies of the incidence of dental caries in<br />

Comprehensive<br />

and youth have been made in every section of the United States.<br />

children<br />

A composite picture of these studies provides some startling facts:<br />

percent of all two-year-old children have one or more<br />

Fifty<br />

teeth;<br />

carious<br />

the time children reach school age they have three or more<br />

By<br />

primary teeth;<br />

decayed<br />

age 16, the average youth has seven decayed, missing or<br />

By<br />

teeth involving 14 tooth surfaces;<br />

filled<br />

than four percent of high school pupils are free of<br />

Less<br />

decay.<br />

dental<br />

addition to these devastating, facts, we know that the six-<br />

In<br />

molar is the most frequent decay casualty the oldest and perhaps<br />

year<br />

important tooth in the mouth. Also, some studies indicate that<br />

most<br />

at age six, the permanent teeth are attacked at an average<br />

beginning<br />

of approximately one tooth.. erson per e. So at age 20,<br />

rate<br />

averageperson has 14 decayed, missing or filled permanent teeth.<br />

the<br />

let us consider some economics. Unfortunately for the<br />

Now<br />

book, it may be reasonable to estimatethat the cost of treat-<br />

pocket<br />

for dental caries in the United States exceeds the cost of treat-<br />

ment<br />

for any other single disease. It is certain that the high cost<br />

ment<br />

dental neglect can be counted among our of nation's pressing<br />

most<br />

problems.<br />

health<br />

109


are other dental health problems which must also receive<br />

There<br />

Research indicates that roughly half of our school children<br />

attention.<br />

evidence of malocclusion. In one survey of 119,000 school child-<br />

have<br />

50 percent had some form of dento-facial abnormalities of which<br />

ren,<br />

80 percent might have been prevented. In other words, one, third<br />

over<br />

the child population was found to suffer from preventable abnormal-<br />

of<br />

ities of the teeth and jaws.<br />

third problem which certainly deserves the attention of<br />

A<br />

and research is that of periodontal diseases. This group of<br />

education<br />

disorders may occur in children when the primary teeth are being<br />

dental<br />

and the permanent teeth are erupting. However, periodontal dis-<br />

shed<br />

are usually associated with adults and they have the unenviable<br />

eases<br />

of being cited as the most common cause of tooth loss in adult<br />

position<br />

life.<br />

recommendations were made concerning dental problems<br />

Several<br />

URBAN WASHINGTON APATHY OR ACTION:<br />

in<br />

to insure that dental hygiene knowledge overcomes all<br />

First,<br />

and language barriers,<br />

cultural<br />

recommend that all local health dep.artments employ<br />

in_-'-disenous<br />

We<br />

to work within minority, and deprived<br />

person_s<br />

communit ies.<br />

to assure that our young people receive this know-<br />

Second,<br />

ledge.<br />

recommend improved instruction in dental hygiene within<br />

pu---blic<br />

We<br />

private schools, especially at the elementary<br />

and<br />

level,<br />

to help eliminate communications barriers between<br />

Third,<br />

care professionals and the poor,<br />

dental<br />

recommend that the Washington State Dental Association<br />

We<br />

cooperation with institutions of highereducation create<br />

i-<br />

programs fo__ralldenta ! professionals t__o<br />

informational<br />

greater cultural and social awareness. We further<br />

cultivate<br />

thatall dntal pr--essionals have an internship<br />

recommend<br />

racial or ethnic minority, area.<br />

in.a<br />

dentists certainly must be commended for taking the lead<br />

The<br />

Washington in advocating a method of alleviating dental<br />

in<br />

on a widespread, inexpensive basis, that is, fluori-<br />

problems<br />

of the water. This approach is the most practical<br />

dation<br />

economical step that can be taken in the dental health<br />

and<br />

Therefore,<br />

field.<br />

ii0.


ecommend legislation on a statewide basis providing fo__r<br />

We<br />

in Washington state's municipal domestic water<br />

fluoridation<br />

systems as a nutriment for bones and teeth.<br />

arguments for fluoridation are many, and all need not be<br />

The<br />

here. There are three points,.however, that should<br />

repeated<br />

be stressed. One, fluoridation is not expensive. If it<br />

now<br />

required on a statewide basis, the state could provide<br />

were<br />

necessary mechanisms for very little cost. Second, many<br />

the<br />

the communities in our state already have natural fluoride<br />

of<br />

their water systems. Third, the additional fluoride to<br />

in<br />

water reduces the number of cavities and other den-<br />

drinking<br />

problems by almost two-thirds for such a small invest-<br />

tal<br />

of funds.<br />

ment<br />

next essential step in dental care is to make it avail-<br />

The<br />

to everybody. Therefore,<br />

able<br />

recommend that the Department of Public Assistance provide<br />

W__e<br />

for more extensive an__d continuousdental car, and that<br />

funds<br />

practicing dentists b__e fully informed regarding the current<br />

al__l<br />

of remuneration.<br />

rate<br />

than just funds are necessary. The dentists must be able<br />

More<br />

relate to the people they are serving in these programs.<br />

to<br />

are also many families who are earning enough to stay<br />

There<br />

the welfare rolls, yet they cannot afford adequate dental<br />

off<br />

Health insurance programs often do not include dental<br />

care.<br />

Employment disability insurance usually does not<br />

provisions.<br />

any dental help either. The private and public sectors<br />

offer<br />

work together to solve this critical problem. There-<br />

should<br />

fore,<br />

recommend that the Washington State Dental Association<br />

We<br />

state agencies create provisions fo__r<br />

R_ppropriate<br />

families (not on public assistance) to obtain<br />

low-icome<br />

deltas care<br />

adequ<br />

was no discussion in the report of the Governor's<br />

There<br />

Council on Urban Affairs concerning the role of the Vocational<br />

Advisory<br />

agency in dental health. The funds of Vocational Rehab-<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

may be spent to improve the dental health of clients; Money<br />

ilitation<br />

be spent to examine and treat a client, including supplying dentures.<br />

may<br />

this service can be provided only those who meet all the<br />

Obviously<br />

eligibility requirements for services.<br />

iii


Programs<br />

The Aging<br />

a 1966 report of the Administration on Aging of the U. S.<br />

In<br />

of Health, Education, and Welfare, these facts about the<br />

Department<br />

population of older Americans appear:<br />

in every ii persons in the United States is aged 65<br />

One<br />

over a total of 18-1/2 million men and women. This<br />

or<br />

exceeds the total population of the 20 smallest<br />

number<br />

states.<br />

this century, the percentage of the United States<br />

In<br />

aged 65 and over more than doubled (from<br />

population<br />

in 1900 to 9.4% in 1965), while the number increased<br />

4.1%<br />

(from 3 million to more than 18 million.)<br />

six-fold<br />

outlive men. There are about 129 older women per<br />

Women<br />

older men. Life expectancy at birth is 73.7 years<br />

i00<br />

females and 66.9 for males. Life expectancy for<br />

for<br />

is still increasing faster than for men.<br />

women<br />

out of every i0 persons 65 or over live in the<br />

Three<br />

most populous states--New York, California, Penn-<br />

four<br />

and Illinois--each of which has more than one<br />

sylvania,<br />

million.<br />

the next 20 years, the older population of the<br />

During<br />

States is expected to increase almost 40 percent<br />

United<br />

to 25 million people.<br />

Washington State there are about 300,000 people aged 65<br />

In<br />

older, about i0 percent of the population. In 1975, it is expected<br />

and<br />

there will be more than 350,000 of these people, according to the<br />

that<br />

and Community Affairs Agency. The proportion of the State of<br />

Planning<br />

population which is age 65 and over is approximately what<br />

Washington's<br />

is in the United States as a whole.<br />

it<br />

of our rural counties are becoming retirement havens<br />

Many<br />

the elderly. With this group come special problems. Great numbers<br />

for<br />

the elderly are now in hospitals and nursing homes. Many wait out<br />

of<br />

remaining years inactive, lonely, impoverished, bitter. One<br />

their<br />

solution to the problems of some of these elderly people was<br />

possible<br />

in a column by Sylvia Porter which was published in the SEATTLE<br />

provided<br />

POST-INTELLIGENCER, August 21, 1968. It is quoted in full as follows:<br />

this era, Old Age is a Long Time. If you have enough<br />

In<br />

absorbing interests and goodhealth, the 20 to 30<br />

money,<br />

even 40 years of retirement--voluntary or involuntary--<br />

or<br />

be-pleasant and rewarding. But if you are poor, have<br />

can<br />

112


had the chance to develop interests and have under-<br />

never<br />

your health through decades of neglect, the older<br />

mined<br />

years can be unadulterated Hell.<br />

shouldn't there be a "Late Start" program designed to<br />

Why<br />

the older person live to the end in proper dignity--<br />

help<br />

as the successful "Head. Start" proect is designed to<br />

just<br />

the child of poverty get a proper beginning?<br />

help<br />

definitely should be, says Genevieve Blatt, Assistant<br />

There<br />

of the Office of Economic Opportunity in Washington,<br />

Director<br />

she argues "it could be set up easily in many communities<br />

and<br />

costing a great deal of money." It's a fascinating<br />

without<br />

which you could adapt right now in your own neigh-<br />

concept<br />

at a minimum cost--if you have the needed enthusiasm<br />

borhood<br />

and cooperation of your neighbors and community leaders.<br />

fundamental point is that our older poor are the most<br />

The<br />

of all groups in our society. They never<br />

"disadvantaged"<br />

the advantage of Head Start now available for poor<br />

had<br />

they never received the training now provided<br />

children;<br />

teen-agers throughNeighborhood Youth or Job Corps; they<br />

for<br />

had the chance for retraining now available for young<br />

never<br />

middle-aged workers through various programs.. So they<br />

and<br />

a long portion of their lives with the new burden of<br />

face<br />

age on top of the burden of poverty. If we can't give<br />

old<br />

a real start, saysMiss Blatt, we ought to be able to<br />

them<br />

give them a Late Start. Here is how it might work:<br />

limited number of men and women 25 or 30 who qualify<br />

A<br />

old and poor, would be. assembled in a neighborhood group.<br />

as<br />

definitions could be the qualifying age for Social<br />

The<br />

benefits (62 to 65) and the official income poverty<br />

Security<br />

($3,300 for a family of. four.) This would involve about<br />

line<br />

people.<br />

5,500,000<br />

coordinator, several instructors and aides would be neces-<br />

A<br />

Some or all might be volunteers (no cost); the meeting<br />

sary.<br />

could be any school room or hall (perhaps also<br />

facilities<br />

needed supplies and health facilities might be obtained<br />

free);<br />

through existing channels (free too.)<br />

group would be. given thorough physicals. Since most<br />

The<br />

be entitled to full Medicare benefits and the services<br />

would<br />

of neighborhood health centers, costs should be minimal.<br />

nutritious meal would be served each day. It could be<br />

A<br />

mainly from surplus foods by volunteers or a regular<br />

prepared<br />

school staff. The cost could be 40 Cents per day per person.<br />

courses might be given in morning, afternoon or<br />

Training<br />

sessions of three hours each, tailored to the local,<br />

evening<br />

113


ethnic and other characteristics of the partici-<br />

economic,<br />

pants.<br />

the types of training could be: instruction in saving<br />

Among<br />

on buying; making the most of a limited income, avoid-<br />

money<br />

gyps, overcharges; how to select, prepare and serve food<br />

ing<br />

in basic reading and.writing; caft refreshers which<br />

courses<br />

lead to employment. (For instance, training a one-<br />

could<br />

typist in use of the electric typewriter or an ex-math<br />

time<br />

in the "new math." Or any older person might be<br />

teacher<br />

in art and music appreciation, making ceramics,<br />

instructed<br />

woodwork, metal work, knitting, crocheting, etc.)<br />

costs would depend on the extent of volunteer and com-<br />

The<br />

contributions. Older persons themselves should be<br />

munity<br />

primarily in charge.<br />

is just an outline and it's understandably fuzzy--but<br />

This<br />

warrants a test on a national scale to see how it would<br />

it<br />

and at what cost. For the objective is not fuzzy at<br />

work<br />

to give our older poor at least a "Late Start" in<br />

all:<br />

decent, dignified living. Dare you downgrade that?<br />

important study of rehabilitation potential was done in<br />

An<br />

State in the early 1960s. This study was concerned with<br />

Washington<br />

elderly in nursing homes and in general hospitals and was reported<br />

the<br />

in PROJECT REPORT, REHABILITATION EDUCATION SERVICE "...HELPING<br />

upon<br />

TO HELP THEMSELVES," June 1962. It was co-sponsored by the<br />

PEOPLE<br />

Departments of Health and Public Assistance and the Division of<br />

State<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation. A summary of the project is quoted:<br />

Summary<br />

purpose of the Rehabilitation Education Service Project<br />

The<br />

to demonstrate the effectiveness of a multi-disciplinary<br />

was<br />

teaching service for nursing home personnel.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

demonstration wascarried out in licensed nursing homes<br />

The<br />

the State of Washington by an experienced staff who were<br />

in<br />

to teach rehabilitative techniques and procedures.<br />

qualified<br />

teaching program consisted of classroom instruction and<br />

This<br />

for nursing home personnel followed by teach-<br />

demonstration<br />

the staff how to put into practice what they had.been<br />

ing<br />

in class as they gave direct care to patients.<br />

taught<br />

Project was financed by grant funds from the Office of<br />

The<br />

Rehabilitation and appropriately matched by the<br />

Vocational<br />

sponsoring agencies, the Washington State Department<br />

three<br />

Health, the State Department of Public Assistance, and<br />

of<br />

State Board for Vocational Education Division of Voca-<br />

the<br />

Rehabilitation. This statewide Project was approved<br />

tional<br />

for a three-year period.<br />

114


program was carried out under the administration and<br />

The<br />

of a coordinator who was responsible for medical<br />

supervision<br />

to the chief of the Division of Adult Health of<br />

direction<br />

State Department of Health and generally responsible to<br />

the<br />

three sponsoring agencies. In addition to the coordin-<br />

the<br />

and secretary, the staff included three nurses, an<br />

ator<br />

therapist, a physical therapist, a social worker,<br />

occupational<br />

a vocational counselor. Serving as consultants to the<br />

and<br />

and the nursing home staff were physiatrists, psychia-.<br />

team<br />

nutritionists, speech therapists, a hearing aid consul<br />

trists,<br />

and other specialists as medically determined to be<br />

tant,<br />

in considering the total needs of a patient in the<br />

necessary<br />

for rehabilitation. Specialists on the staff of spon-<br />

plan<br />

agencies were available as needed and requested.<br />

soring<br />

nursing homes were selected for the demonstration,<br />

Twelve<br />

one chronic disease unit of a general hospital.<br />

including<br />

ranged in capacity from l0 to 270 beds, and included<br />

These<br />

non-profit and proprietary facilities. The team spent<br />

both<br />

to ten weeks in each home in order to conduct the<br />

eight<br />

and demonstration. Three educational programs,<br />

teaching<br />

formal classes and clinical instruction, were<br />

including<br />

on simultaneously; one for nursing home personnel,<br />

carried<br />

for the activity director and volunteers participating<br />

one<br />

the activity program, and a third for public health nurses<br />

in<br />

and other professional people.<br />

at class by nursing home staff was in general<br />

Attendance<br />

However, in the majority of the demonstration<br />

satisfactory.<br />

the administrator and charge nurse did not attend<br />

homes<br />

either becauseof pressure of work in the home or<br />

regularly<br />

they failed to grasp the full significance of their<br />

because<br />

in classes. The licensed practical nurses<br />

participation<br />

nurse aides were the principal recipients of the teaching<br />

and<br />

It was difficult for the nursing home staff to<br />

program.<br />

that all parts of the demonstration--nursing care,<br />

recognize<br />

and activity program are indivisible in a total<br />

exercises<br />

rehabilitative plan for the patient.<br />

of the significant phases of the Project was the active<br />

One<br />

and interest of the community, local health and<br />

participation<br />

assistance departments. Through their sponsorship<br />

public<br />

have given their support to the continuation of the<br />

they<br />

program and extension of its services to other facilities.<br />

effort was made by the nursing home personnel and<br />

Consistent<br />

to interest the local physicians in the Project and to<br />

team<br />

their participation. Their interest was generally<br />

encourage<br />

until they observed their patients actively partici-<br />

limited<br />

It was noted, however, that some physicians increased<br />

pating.<br />

referrals to demonstration homes and that such homes<br />

their<br />

began to develop waiting lists for admission.<br />

115


insure objectivity the formal evaluation of the Project<br />

To<br />

conducted by two trained researchers from the University<br />

was<br />

Washington. The Project was evaluated from as many differ-<br />

of<br />

directions as possible. The administrators, charge nurses<br />

ent<br />

activity directors of the demonstration homes were each<br />

and<br />

interviewed. Local public health nurses who worked<br />

personally<br />

the RESP in their own counties and'the public assistance<br />

with<br />

who served patients in the demonstration homes<br />

caseworkers<br />

surveyed by questionnaires. Patient records did not<br />

were<br />

sufficient information for reliable evaluation of<br />

provide<br />

changes. Some of the indirect effects of the rehabili-<br />

patient<br />

program on the social system of the nursing home were<br />

tation<br />

through job satisfaction tests given to all employees<br />

measured<br />

and after the demonstration in the last five homes.<br />

before<br />

with respect to geriatric nursing and rehabilita-<br />

Attitudes<br />

philosophy of all staff members also were measured<br />

tive<br />

before and fter the demonstration.<br />

an average age of approximately 80 in nursing homes it<br />

With<br />

difficult to measure or evaluate gains in physical restora-<br />

is<br />

but the case studies graphically describe the mental and<br />

tion<br />

improvement of some patients from a state of total<br />

physical<br />

to varying degrees of independence in daily living.<br />

dependency<br />

results gained in a relatively short time have not only<br />

Such<br />

public interest but have inspired the nursing home<br />

created<br />

to take initiative in rehabilitative programs for<br />

personnel<br />

patients. Rehabilitative nursing care is being recog-<br />

their<br />

as necessary in an increasing number of nursing homes.<br />

nized<br />

Rehabilitation Education Service Project has shown that<br />

The<br />

chronically ill and disabled persons can be restored to<br />

many<br />

degrees of independence under the care and supervision<br />

varying<br />

an understanding nursing home staff and the application<br />

of<br />

rehabilitative techniquesin the day-by-day care of the<br />

of<br />

The Washington State Department of Health, with<br />

patients.<br />

firm belief that this type of program is significant in<br />

the<br />

development of higher standards of nursing care and<br />

the<br />

by the Washington State Nursing Home Association,<br />

encouraged<br />

made provision for a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation<br />

has<br />

on the staff of the Chronic Disease Section. This ser-<br />

team<br />

will be an ongoing part of the State Department of<br />

vice<br />

program available to all nursing homes and hospitals<br />

Health<br />

for chronically ill and disabled persons.<br />

caring<br />

work with the aging will increase, partly as<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

result of the increasing numbers of elderly people, partly because<br />

a<br />

the growing realization on the part of society that better provis-<br />

of<br />

should be made for the elderly. The provision for self-care<br />

ions<br />

is part of the Vocational Rehabilitation law in Washington<br />

services<br />

More can be done to help elderly people with independent living.<br />

State.<br />

116


Correctional Rehabilitation<br />

number of states have begun to have vocational rehabilita-<br />

A<br />

programs for people detained in prisons, reformatories and jails.<br />

tion<br />

was one of the earlier states to begin this effort. Mr. Cecil<br />

Washington<br />

as a Vocational Rehabilitation counselor w.orking in Spokane,<br />

Price,<br />

began this program in a formal way sveral years ago. How-<br />

Washington,<br />

there was only a modest expansion of the program until 1967.<br />

ever,<br />

Price was promoted to State Supervisor of Correctional Services.<br />

Mr.<br />

description of the correctional program, prepared in October, 1968,<br />

His<br />

is quoted below:<br />

Chapter 134, Laws of 1967, established a Division of<br />

When<br />

and Parole within the State Department of Public<br />

Probation<br />

effective July 1967, a cooperative agreement<br />

Institutions,<br />

that Department and the Division of Vocational<br />

between<br />

(DVR) had already been drawn between the<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

agencies.<br />

two<br />

1966 Dr. Garrett Heyns, Superintendent, Department of<br />

In<br />

made a strong request for the assignment of<br />

Institutions,<br />

of VocationalRehabilitation personnel, to work<br />

Division<br />

inmates of correctional institutions. The coopera-<br />

with<br />

agreement referred to above was developed that year<br />

tive<br />

signed September 15, 1966, by representatives of the<br />

and<br />

agencies. Provision was thus made for the development<br />

two<br />

a cooperative rehabilitation program within adult and<br />

of<br />

youth correctional facilities and for specialized<br />

older<br />

in some communities of the state.<br />

caseloads<br />

first assignment of avocational rehabilitation officer<br />

The<br />

a correctional institution rehabilitation unit occurred<br />

to<br />

April 1967. Other assignments were made through May 1968,<br />

in<br />

the total Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

bringing<br />

specializing in work with public offenders to<br />

personnel<br />

Eight of these are now working principally within<br />

eleven.<br />

but they follow their paroled clients into<br />

institutions,<br />

community within commuting distance of their work stations<br />

the<br />

transfer other clients to Correctional Rehabilitation<br />

and<br />

staff wherever this appears practical.<br />

Services<br />

year the greatest need for additional community, special-<br />

This<br />

in this endeavor appears to be in Tacoma and Vancouver.<br />

ists<br />

vocational rehabilitation officers in the general<br />

Several<br />

program accepted rather large numbers of<br />

rehabilitation<br />

offender clients in these communities. Vacant posi-<br />

public<br />

exist in Seattle and Chehalis, the latter to. serve<br />

tions<br />

referrals made by Green Hill School and Maple Lane School.<br />

of the eligible and ineligible clients referred from<br />

Most<br />

institutions have been diagnosed as having<br />

correctional<br />

disorders which have their source in cultural,<br />

behavioral<br />

environmental, educational, vocational, and other<br />

social,<br />

117


and result in severe limitations on work and commun-<br />

factors,<br />

adjustment. For these persons major changes in attitudes<br />

ity<br />

behavior come slowly and with great effort if they come<br />

and<br />

all.<br />

at<br />

member of the Division of Vocatioqal Rehabilitation staff<br />

Each<br />

to Correctional Rehabilitation Services strives to<br />

assigned<br />

out realistic and effective rehabilitation plans with<br />

work<br />

clients. That the plan be the client's plan (not that<br />

his<br />

the vocational rehabilitation officer) is critical whether<br />

of<br />

is incarcerated, paroled, or on probation. Services must<br />

he<br />

be purchased by the Division of Vocational Rehabilita-<br />

often<br />

tion.<br />

greatest need now appears to be to provide adequate field<br />

The<br />

community vocational rehabilitation officers to accept<br />

or<br />

service transfers from institutional rehabilitation units<br />

and<br />

to work with many more probationers and parolees, and<br />

and<br />

the probation and parole officers who are supervising<br />

with<br />

them.<br />

of our service figures for the month beginning Septem-<br />

Some<br />

i, 1968, may be of interest.<br />

ber<br />

Corrections Center<br />

Washington<br />

A 5<br />

Counselor<br />

IndividualCaseloadsTotal Caseloads<br />

B. 58<br />

Counselor<br />

C 114 177<br />

Counselor<br />

State Penitentiary<br />

Washington<br />

D 107<br />

Counselor<br />

E<br />

145<br />

Counselor<br />

F 138<br />

Counselor<br />

State Reformatory<br />

Washington<br />

G 33<br />

Counselor<br />

Counselor H 68<br />

TOTAL INSTITUTIONS CASELOAD 668<br />

Services, Probation and Parole Referrals<br />

Community<br />

I Seattle Area: 129<br />

Counselor<br />

J Spokane " 106<br />

Counselor<br />

K Spokane " 41<br />

Counselor<br />

TOTAL COMMUNITY CASELOAD 276<br />

GRAND TOTAL 944<br />

118<br />

390<br />

i01<br />

Total<br />

Caseloads


of services to public offenders is done on a<br />

Financing<br />

Party" basis. Contributions of the Department of<br />

"Third<br />

to the cooperative rehabilitation effort (such<br />

Institutions<br />

staff salaries, office space, equipment) are used as<br />

as<br />

funds to earn matching federal funds for services<br />

state<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. No state<br />

of<br />

money is involved. The size of the cooperative<br />

appropriated<br />

is related to the degree of support by the Depart-<br />

program<br />

of Institutions and the availability of federal funds<br />

ment<br />

third party financing. (End of statement by Mr. Price)<br />

for<br />

of the limitations of this program is that even now,<br />

One<br />

rehabilitation counselors are housed in each of the state correc-<br />

after<br />

institutions for adults and most of those for juveniles, there<br />

tional<br />

very few prisoners who are being served, and still fewer who have<br />

are<br />

been rehabilitated.<br />

wrote:<br />

In his 1968 book, THE CRIME OF PUNISHMENT, Karl Menninger<br />

is the system. This is the way we do it. A handful<br />

This<br />

men, relatively, have been caught and convicted and<br />

of<br />

to prison, while most offenders remain at large.<br />

consigned<br />

can we change the public image of all this, from the<br />

How<br />

police through the clumsy trial procedure, to<br />

handicapped<br />

great lockup where wickedness is confined and penitent<br />

the<br />

are beating their breasts? The prisons, whether new,<br />

souls<br />

steel and concrete warehouses or old, gloomy, grimy<br />

shiny<br />

are full of people--not, for the most part, vicious,<br />

lockups<br />

men who have done dreadful things, nor yet penitent,<br />

violent<br />

breast-beating men who wish they had not<br />

hand-wringing,<br />

the bank. They are full of men labeled rmiZ<br />

robbed<br />

they got caught at something and convicted of some-<br />

because<br />

forbidden. But they are mostly poor, inadequate,<br />

thing<br />

frustrated misfits--young failures, or life-<br />

incompetent,<br />

failures, offenders who could not even make a success<br />

long<br />

of crime!<br />

while an armyof men across the country tries to serve<br />

And<br />

interests and safety by turning the wheels of this<br />

our<br />

machine for the grinding up of a minority of the<br />

infernal<br />

offenders and administering to them the futile<br />

easily-caught<br />

of punishment, a horde of known but immune predatory<br />

ritual<br />

criminals grows fat and famous in front of our<br />

professional<br />

eyes.<br />

will likely be significant improvements in this situa-<br />

There<br />

in the time to come. This was decided early in the life of the<br />

tion<br />

Commission when it was voted that "the State has a special<br />

Planning<br />

to try to rehabilitate those who are wholly or partly<br />

responsibility<br />

dependent on it and/or one of its political subdivisions."<br />

119


October 18, 1968 a document was signed which was designed<br />

On<br />

help those people in correctional and other institutions. This<br />

to<br />

was described in the Winter Issue, 1968, Vocational Rehabili-<br />

document<br />

OUTLOOK, Vol. 5, No. i, as follows:<br />

tation<br />

greater numbers of individuals in state institutions<br />

Far<br />

expected to be better equipped to met the challenges<br />

are<br />

the outside world when they return to their communities<br />

of<br />

a result of a recent agreement signed by two state<br />

as<br />

agencies.<br />

agreement made by the Department of Institutions and<br />

The<br />

State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation calls for<br />

the<br />

rehabilitation agency to begin a program of services<br />

the<br />

each major area of the Department. A full-grown program<br />

in<br />

is the goal of the agreement.<br />

William R. Conte, Institutions chief, and E. M. Oliver,<br />

Dr.<br />

Rehabilitation Director, pointed out that the new<br />

State<br />

was developed as a result of a close-working<br />

program<br />

between the two state agencies over the last<br />

relationship<br />

two years.<br />

new effort will require additional highly trained<br />

The<br />

Full development of the program is dependent<br />

counselors.<br />

the recruitment of new personnel, with recruiting<br />

on<br />

staff having a high priority.<br />

trained<br />

of trained personnel will be undertaken and<br />

Promotions<br />

training programs for counselors and other needed<br />

special<br />

is planned. The undertaking will utilize Federal<br />

staff<br />

available to the State of Washington to match certain<br />

funds<br />

funds being used .in the rehabilitation of persons<br />

State<br />

the institutions.<br />

leaving<br />

of the two agencies will be directed toward build-<br />

Efforts<br />

an effective bridge for those leaving Institutions,<br />

ing<br />

the bridge designed to give such individuals needed<br />

with<br />

and help so they won't have to return to institu-<br />

direction<br />

Part of the bridge represents not only the growing<br />

tions.<br />

to extend institutional and .rehabilitation services,<br />

need<br />

it also represents the need for vocational education<br />

but<br />

and other services.<br />

re-education<br />

Conte noted that his department has five divisions which<br />

Dr.<br />

32 institutions, in addition to handling many<br />

operate<br />

community services.<br />

average daily resident population exceeds 12,000 in<br />

"The<br />

institutions" Dr. Conte said, "And the vast majority<br />

those<br />

those persons are vocationally handicapp.ed and in need<br />

of<br />

rehabilitation services.<br />

of<br />

120


than 6,000 persons of working age between 16 and 60<br />

"More<br />

discharged from our institutions annually and virtually<br />

are<br />

meet the criteria of physical or mental disability estab-<br />

all<br />

by the state vocational rehabilitation agency."<br />

lished<br />

Oliver stated that, "Our rehabilitation agency welcomes<br />

Mr.<br />

opportunity to work withDr. Conte Snd his staff in<br />

the<br />

carrying out this new effort."<br />

only will it be necessary to have an enormous expansion<br />

Not<br />

services in the state prisons and state reformatories; to complete<br />

of<br />

rehabilitation job it will be necessary that rehabilitation ser-<br />

the<br />

be provided those on probation and parole and those in city and<br />

vices<br />

county jails.<br />

his first poignant scene in WINTERSET, Maxwell Anderson's<br />

In<br />

speak about prison:<br />

characters<br />

Now look, Trock, look, what would the warden say to<br />

SHADOW.<br />

like that?<br />

talk<br />

May they die as I die! By God, what life they've<br />

TROCK.<br />

me they shall keep me well! I'ii have that out of them-<br />

left<br />

these pismires that walk like men!<br />

Because, look, chief, it's all against science and<br />

SHADOW.<br />

for you to get out and begin to cuss that way<br />

penology<br />

your prison vittles are out of you. Hell, you're<br />

before<br />

to leave the pen full of high thought, kind of<br />

supposed<br />

loving toward all mankind, ready-to kiss their<br />

noble-like,<br />

whatever parts they stick out toward you. Look<br />

feet--or<br />

at me!<br />

I see you. And even you may not live as long as<br />

TROCK.<br />

think. You think too many things are funny. Well,<br />

you<br />

laugh. But it's not so funny.<br />

Come on, Trock, you know me. Anything you say goes,<br />

SHADOW.<br />

give me leave.to kid a little.<br />

but<br />

Then laugh at somebody else! It's a lot safer!<br />

TROCK.<br />

soaked me once too often in that vat of oisoned<br />

They've<br />

they keep upstate to soak men in, and I'm rotten in-<br />

hell<br />

I'm all one liquid puke inside where I had lungs<br />

side,<br />

like yourself! And now they want to get me and stir<br />

once,<br />

in again--and that'd kill me--and that's fine for them.<br />

me<br />

Division of Research and Demonstration Grants of the<br />

The<br />

and Rehabilitation Service, Department Of Health, Education,<br />

Social<br />

Welfare, in their RESEARCH BRIEF of January 1969, has stated as<br />

and<br />

follows:<br />

121


three million serious crimes came to police attention<br />

Almost<br />

1965. This figure, however, is by no means complete, for<br />

in<br />

a study of 1,700 persons, 91 percent admitted to one or<br />

in<br />

of 49 offenses for which they might, if detected, have<br />

more<br />

jail or prison sentences. While the imprisoned<br />

received<br />

emerges as a generally inadequate and disadvantaged<br />

offender<br />

this cannot explain the full rnge of crime, much<br />

person,<br />

which is unreported and unsolved.<br />

of<br />

people commit a disproportionate share of all crimes,<br />

Young<br />

their numbers are growing faster than the total popula-<br />

and<br />

The 15 to 17 age group comprises only 5.4% of the<br />

tion.<br />

but accounts for almost 13% of all arrests.<br />

population<br />

this group will become a larger portion of the<br />

Tomorrow,<br />

population, bringing a corresponding possibility of<br />

total<br />

more crime. This is deeply disturbing not only to<br />

even.<br />

interested in conserving human resources but also<br />

those<br />

those trying to cope with a rising volume of crime.<br />

to treat offenders individually and justly, and how to<br />

How<br />

those social conditions in which crime flourishes,<br />

transform<br />

the two main problems in correctional rehabilitation.<br />

are<br />

has easy solutions. In recent (1968) Harris<br />

Neither<br />

of public and professional attitudes toward crime<br />

Surveys<br />

corrections, both groups agreed that rehabilitation to<br />

and<br />

the offender a productive citizen should be our main<br />

make<br />

The public felt that offenders need more help after<br />

goal.<br />

that community acceptance is a major problem, but<br />

release,<br />

unwilling to pay higher taxes for better correctional<br />

were<br />

unreceptive to Halfway Houses for .released offen-<br />

programs,<br />

in their own neighborhoods, and unenthusiastic about<br />

ders<br />

in correctional work for their own children. Cor-<br />

careers<br />

workers felt there must be more community involve-<br />

rectional<br />

if programs are to be effective, but noted that lack<br />

ment<br />

community acceptance, trained personnel, and adequate<br />

-of<br />

funds are three major hurdles facing such programs.<br />

description of the present situation in prisons was dis-<br />

A<br />

in an article by Bruce Jackson in the NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE<br />

cussed<br />

September 2, 1968 entitled, "Our Prisons are Criminal 'Not one<br />

of<br />

them really does its job--and the worst of them practice old-<br />

of<br />

fashioned barbarity.'" Mr. Jackson stated that:<br />

has the longest prison sentences in the West, yet<br />

America<br />

only condition long sentencesdemonstrably cure is<br />

the<br />

heterosexuality.<br />

Further, he said:<br />

countries such as Denmark and Sweden have immensely<br />

Other<br />

prison education. Yet in the United States with<br />

improved<br />

122


its fancy schools and its splendid mass media, with all<br />

all<br />

technology and experts prison education barely makes<br />

its<br />

for the basic reading and writing skills the inmate never<br />

up<br />

on the outside. England s about to legalize conjugal<br />

got<br />

rights for married inmate men, because it realizes<br />

visiting<br />

there is much social value in keeping an inmate's<br />

that<br />

together. But in this country eople trying to make<br />

family<br />

prison experience more socally beneficial in almost any<br />

the<br />

way are accused of "coddling" criminals.<br />

nature of the myopia, though disheartening, is not hard<br />

The<br />

determine. With rare exceptions our approach to the<br />

to<br />

of crime and correction is an approach to the symptom<br />

problem<br />

than the cure.<br />

rather<br />

we should be honest with ourselves; if what we want<br />

Maybe<br />

vengeance, we've got pretty good models going in several<br />

is<br />

right now. If what we want is to make the streets<br />

places<br />

our property more secure, our nights more tranquil,<br />

safer,<br />

we want to help those people (and at the same time our-<br />

if<br />

we had best redefine what those places with their<br />

selves),<br />

their wires, their guns and their, bars are required<br />

walls,<br />

do.<br />

to<br />

following statement by Donald R. Johns, Ph.D., was pre-<br />

The<br />

for his employer, the Department of Institutions. Dr. Johns<br />

pared<br />

served as a task force chairman for the Planning Commission<br />

visits to prisoners have long been a topic, of consider-<br />

Marital<br />

interest in the United States, although frankly to date<br />

able<br />

is mostly talk. Moreover there seems to be more such<br />

it<br />

among persons who observe prisons than there is among<br />

talk<br />

those who operate them.<br />

Alternatives t__o Conjugal Visitin<br />

may as well prejudice the issue early in the discussion.<br />

One<br />

or not there Bhoud be conjugal visits it seems quite<br />

Whether<br />

that there w t be such visits in most American<br />

clear<br />

in the near future. There are several reasons, and<br />

prisons<br />

may be useful to present these as "objectively" as possible,<br />

it<br />

that some of these reasons are based more on opinions<br />

granting<br />

are strongly held. On what basis, then, are "conjugal<br />

which<br />

unlikely?<br />

programs"<br />

visits, realistically,.can serve only those pris-<br />

Such<br />

with intact marriages. This represents, of<br />

oners<br />

a very partial solution to the general problem<br />

course,<br />

sexuality in confinement. The effect on prison<br />

of<br />

specifically probably would be negligible,<br />

homosexuality<br />

because "well-married" prisoners are in the<br />

both<br />

123


and because they are comparatively unlikely<br />

minority<br />

be much involved in the prison's "serious" homo-<br />

to<br />

sexual activities.<br />

facilities for such visits are lacking<br />

Appropriate<br />

almost all prison settings. Constructing and staff-<br />

in<br />

these facilities would necessarily take its place<br />

ing<br />

the various needs Which compete for priority<br />

among<br />

It is not surprising that needed facilities<br />

attention.<br />

education, training, medical care, and so forth,<br />

for<br />

"win out" in this competition. In this<br />

consistently<br />

there are some values which may be more cherished<br />

sense,<br />

in the American scene than is motherhood!<br />

practical problems in administration are several.<br />

The<br />

concerns, common-law marriages, potential<br />

Security<br />

jealousies, and.possible coercive use by<br />

prisoner<br />

of the power to grant or deny such visits are<br />

staff<br />

That there are such problems, and that con-<br />

examples.<br />

staff time might become committed to their<br />

siderable<br />

militates against the program. An under-<br />

management<br />

if regretable, reaction would be "we have<br />

standable,<br />

enough problems on our hands already."<br />

support for marital visits is meager.<br />

Administrative<br />

survey* found less than i0 percent of the 73 prison<br />

One<br />

surveyed to be in favor of conjugal visits.<br />

wardens<br />

percent of those polled, and 56 percent of those<br />

Forty<br />

answered were opposed. More than half of those<br />

who<br />

were non-committal in one way or another (did not<br />

polled<br />

were undecided, non-committal, or would refer<br />

respond,<br />

question to "higher administration"). Successful<br />

the<br />

generally require consider.ably stronger admin-<br />

programs<br />

support than is implied by these figures.<br />

istrative<br />

undocumented, but obvious problem arises with respect<br />

An<br />

"climate." The frankly sexual visit, in this culture,<br />

to<br />

unmistakably degrading connotations. There would<br />

has<br />

to be serious question whether conjugal visits<br />

seem<br />

escape the imagery and feeling-tone implied. It<br />

could<br />

be expected, for example, that many wiveswould<br />

might<br />

intense conflict between the desire to be<br />

experience<br />

their husbands and a sense of cheapness or baseness<br />

with<br />

making such openly sexual visits. Since women are<br />

in<br />

infrequently concerned about whether their husbands<br />

not<br />

are interested in them only for sex, this "hang-up"<br />

Balogh, Joseph K. Conjugal Visitations i__n_nPrisons: A Sociological<br />

*<br />

In FEDERAL PROBATION, September 1964<br />

Perspective.<br />

124


sometimes exacerbate marital problems while<br />

might<br />

to relieve them. To the extent that this<br />

attempting<br />

a real problem, the conjugal visit presents the<br />

is<br />

with a bad choice. If there are ways of pro-<br />

couple<br />

for sexual needs within the context of a more<br />

viding<br />

atmosphere, then those alternatives should be<br />

natural<br />

given careful attention..<br />

The possibility of increasing the numbers of children<br />

6,<br />

to "inadequate families" and supported by public<br />

born<br />

is obvious, and presumably would militate<br />

welfare<br />

community support for such changes in public<br />

against<br />

It would simply be easier, for example, to<br />

policy.<br />

the issue than it would be to wrestle through<br />

neglect<br />

questions potentially involved (e.g., mandatory<br />

the<br />

as a pre-condition of such visits as one<br />

birth-control<br />

solution to the problem ofincreased public dependency).<br />

state the case of conjugal .visits more positively, it<br />

To<br />

be predicted that implementation of such "programs"<br />

might<br />

might be expected when:<br />

There are facilities available which could be converted<br />

io<br />

and not too expensively to such use;<br />

satisfactorily<br />

interest in such a program is reasonably<br />

Administrative<br />

high;<br />

to such programs is not strong or not actively<br />

Opposition<br />

organized;<br />

practical problems can be carefully recognized,<br />

The<br />

for, and managed.<br />

planned<br />

Variations on a Theme TheFamilyVisit<br />

usual image of conjugal visiting, at least in this coun-<br />

The<br />

is probably the little shack on the trustee-farms of<br />

try,<br />

Mississippi prison, with visits regulated by the local<br />

the<br />

A significant departure from this image has been<br />

guards.<br />

at the California State Prison at Tehachapi. Here<br />

developed<br />

previously occupied by staff, is set up for the<br />

housing<br />

to visit "eligible" inmates during the pre-release<br />

family<br />

of their sentence. This situation, for a two or three<br />

phase<br />

period, more closely replicates the full family setting.<br />

day<br />

for cooking and recreation are provided, and the<br />

Facilities<br />

are included. Initial experience with this arrange-<br />

children<br />

has been favorable, rportedly, and it would seem to<br />

ment<br />

many of the objections cited above. The remaining<br />

avoid<br />

are obvious: it serves only a minority; it is<br />

limitations<br />

only during a quite limited portion of the prison-<br />

available<br />

sentence; it is probably realistically feasible only<br />

er's<br />

125


fairly unique circumstances (e.g., vacated staff<br />

under<br />

and it does not serve as a vehicle for bringing<br />

housing);<br />

prisoner into the community in other important ways<br />

the<br />

for on-thespot job interviews). It is, in short,<br />

(e.g.,<br />

what it claims to be: one step toward smoothing, the<br />

only<br />

to community living.<br />

transitional<br />

Authorized Leave as a More Flexible Alternative<br />

visits, similar to the week-end pass used by military<br />

Home<br />

has been suggested as an obvious alternative.*<br />

installations,<br />

The potential advantages of such a system are several:<br />

Their use can be more flexible and serve more objectives<br />

io<br />

can conjugal visits at prison. Employment inter-<br />

than<br />

business matters, experimental "parole" (testing<br />

views,<br />

for brief periods whether a parole plan is adequate),<br />

out<br />

and funeral visits, planned family outings,<br />

hospital<br />

training assignments are some of the more obvious<br />

and<br />

that could be pursued under the structure<br />

activities<br />

such a program. A single administrative policy and<br />

of<br />

of procedures could be developed to cover all<br />

set<br />

under which a prisoner should be placed<br />

circumstances<br />

on authorized leave status, streamlining administration.<br />

facilities and resources could be utilized<br />

Existing<br />

fully in lieu of building, staffing, equipping,<br />

more<br />

supply of certain institutional programs. For<br />

and<br />

certain pre-release activities (e.g., mock<br />

example,<br />

"dry run" job interviews) could be replaced by<br />

or<br />

"real" experience. With respect to family<br />

direct<br />

the family's home or other existing accommo-<br />

visits,<br />

(e.g., apartments, motels) could be used rather<br />

dations<br />

than constructing special facilities for family visits.<br />

The fuller and more natural context of family week-end<br />

3,<br />

be provided for marital visits as such. Particu-<br />

would<br />

visits involving children would be more appro-<br />

larly,<br />

and more satisfying than occurs when children<br />

priate<br />

go to see their father at the prison. There are no<br />

It is difficult to know whom to credit for this idea, but<br />

*<br />

should be acknowledged clearly that this writer is far<br />

it<br />

the first to have thought of it. By 1958 there were<br />

from<br />

programs for selected categories of prisoners<br />

home-leave<br />

England, Wales, North Ireland, Scotland, Denmark,<br />

in<br />

Germany, Greece, and Sweden (see Cavan, R.S.,<br />

Switzerland,<br />

Zemans, E. S., Marital Relationships of Prisoners i__n<br />

and<br />

Countries. In JRNL OF CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINOLOGY<br />

2--8<br />

AND POLICE SCIENCE Vol. 49, No 2, p. 135, 1958.<br />

126


in prison for example in which fathers<br />

accommodations<br />

actually play with their children, much less take<br />

can<br />

on an outing or otherwise give to them. The child<br />

them<br />

only the adult situation where there is opportunity<br />

meets<br />

for talk. The medium of exchange between parents<br />

only<br />

young children, of course, is Rot talk, but is<br />

and<br />

activity, including play. Virtually no "father-<br />

shared<br />

is possible in the prison visit unless it is to<br />

ing"<br />

tell the restless child to sit still.<br />

of adjustment under reduced supervision would be<br />

Tests<br />

before the individual is fully released.<br />

practical<br />

areas of difficulty are identified (e.g., what to<br />

When<br />

on Saturday night) they can be worked with before<br />

do<br />

the individual leaves major supervision.<br />

programs would militate against the general trend<br />

Such<br />

from family consolidation.<br />

away<br />

administrative tasks would be easier than is<br />

Certain<br />

case when visitors go to the prison (particularly,<br />

the<br />

intimate visits than are allowable in the open<br />

more<br />

room). For example, it is less objectionable<br />

visiting<br />

"shake down" aprisoner returning to prison from<br />

to<br />

than it is to search thoroughly a member of his<br />

leave<br />

family who comes to visit.<br />

it be said that only the gains and none of the risks<br />

Lest<br />

discussed by those who advocate various programs, or<br />

are<br />

risks go unrecognized in planning, the potential hazards<br />

lest<br />

disadvantages of authorized leave should be identified.<br />

or<br />

are familiar, however, and are the same hazards which<br />

They<br />

faces at the time of release. They are also the<br />

society<br />

which society faces with itself--with its members<br />

hazards<br />

are not confined. These include:<br />

who<br />

Risk of legal offenses during the individual's period<br />

l.<br />

freedom from institutional surveillance. These<br />

of<br />

should be monitored by careful selection of<br />

risks<br />

and by structuring the situation to which<br />

candidates,<br />

is released (e.g., to be under family surveillance<br />

he<br />

all times).<br />

at<br />

of absconding from supervision. These risks, too,<br />

Risk<br />

the same risk on release to parole, should be<br />

like<br />

by selection and family-community (e.g.,<br />

monitored<br />

officer) surveillance.<br />

parole<br />

127


of inappropriate conduct short of a significant<br />

Risk<br />

offense. With careful screening, these comprise<br />

legal<br />

of the risks--that the individual may get drunk,<br />

most<br />

become involved in some other "nuisance offense"<br />

or<br />

is normally tolerated in the case of citizens who<br />

which<br />

not under institutional care. Although they are<br />

are<br />

visible, so their misconduct does not often<br />

highly<br />

public notice, indications are that selected<br />

escape<br />

"visitors" to the community ae less likely<br />

institution<br />

comprise a public nuisance than are many citizens<br />

to<br />

at-large.<br />

that additional children might be born to problem<br />

Risk<br />

With appropriate counseling (and probably<br />

families."<br />

most cases without it) pregnancies arising from<br />

in<br />

visits should be predicted as low. Most persons<br />

family<br />

for example that this. would be no time to<br />

recognize,<br />

to the family and would simply behave accordingly.<br />

add<br />

normal access to contraceptive methods, and with<br />

With<br />

if necessary, to family-planning counsel, no<br />

access,<br />

increase in such childrenneed be expected.<br />

substantial<br />

the same time, of course, conception remains a<br />

At<br />

of personal choice and personal responsibility<br />

question<br />

all citizens, subject only to advice and education.<br />

for<br />

government is prepared to intervene more strongly<br />

Unless<br />

"population control" generally, these same standards<br />

in<br />

apply to all citizens. To retain an individual<br />

should<br />

prison simply to prevent the birth of children is<br />

in<br />

clearly not the intent of constitutio.nal law.<br />

Place of Authorized Leave in the<br />

The<br />

CorrectionalProcess<br />

Overall<br />

is becoming increasingly clear that the nation's past<br />

It<br />

present system of criminal justice is not fulfilling its<br />

and<br />

mandate, particularly with respect to the long-<br />

appointed<br />

protection of citizens from fellow-citizens. The vast<br />

range<br />

of the crime problem is that of repeated "minor"<br />

majority<br />

(misdemeanors and lessor felonies) for which the rather<br />

crimes<br />

dictum "lock them up and throw away the key" is simply<br />

popular<br />

under any system of "penalties to fit the crime."<br />

unworkable<br />

predominant contemporary pattern is a life-history of<br />

The<br />

crimes and petty penalties, which seem in time to<br />

petty<br />

each other as night follows day. Extending the penal-<br />

follow<br />

introduces a measure of increased short-term safety, but<br />

ties<br />

least in many obvious cases at the cost of increased long-<br />

at<br />

danger. Like the snake-pit philosophy of mental hospitals<br />

term<br />

scant quarter-century ago, the prison all too often still<br />

a<br />

its own dark prophesy of hopelessness. Also like<br />

fulfills<br />

mental hospital, "salvation" must come, no doubt, from<br />

the<br />

source other than variations in custodial care. For<br />

some<br />

128


hospitals, the "breakthrough" was threefold: (i) new<br />

the<br />

(2) the "open door" policy, and (3) more and better<br />

drugs,<br />

(and facilities and materials) to work appropriately<br />

staff<br />

patients.<br />

with<br />

comparatively fewer prisoners than mental patients<br />

Since<br />

likely to benefit substantially fro the "new drugs,"<br />

seem<br />

more visable benefits on the horizon for corrections<br />

the<br />

come in the form of (i) the "open door" or some<br />

should<br />

and (2) increased-improved staff-treatment methods.<br />

variant(s),<br />

would be difficult to declare which of these is to be the<br />

It<br />

important. Certainly in the state hospital experience,<br />

more<br />

latter could not have accomplished its task without the<br />

the<br />

It is less clear whether the former might have been<br />

former.<br />

without much of the latter. That is, the open door<br />

enough<br />

critical; it is harder to determine the specific benefits<br />

was<br />

staff and treatment efforts beyond those rather directly<br />

of<br />

attributable to .drugs, although benefits there clearly were.<br />

"open door" has, in one sense, always been a part of<br />

The<br />

operations. Except in that minority of offenses which<br />

prison<br />

extremely long sentences, the "client" can look forward<br />

yield<br />

release. And it is this, prison administrators agree,<br />

to<br />

than anything else, that creates "motivation,,' conformity,<br />

more<br />

hope. The "open door" in the sense of in-and-out-in-and-<br />

and<br />

for week-ends, home visits, and partial hospitalization<br />

out,<br />

is still almost unknown in prison programs. And<br />

however,<br />

is quite clear that such programs could be extremely use-<br />

it<br />

in the rehabilitation of many persons who are sent to<br />

ful<br />

rather than to a mental hospital. Authorized leave<br />

prison<br />

provide the administrative machinery for accomplishing<br />

could<br />

these improvements in correctional programming.<br />

are probably two main deterrents to the development of<br />

There<br />

policies and practices. First, most penalties in current<br />

such<br />

are measured in confinement-time, and there is an<br />

practice<br />

that this confinement will be continuous until<br />

expectation<br />

Second, there is a general sense that all offenders<br />

parole.<br />

dangerous at the time of conviction, and (hopefully)<br />

are<br />

become safe-to-be-at-large as their sentence moves<br />

gradually<br />

expiration. There is a general confidence, for example,<br />

toward<br />

the "pre-release" period. We expect that, if the person<br />

in<br />

about to be released, he must have become safe.<br />

is<br />

fact is that some of the persons convicted (statistical<br />

The<br />

indicate about forty percent who can be identified)<br />

studies<br />

safe-to-be-at-large throughout their confinement, or<br />

are<br />

be released occasionally without undue risk. It is for<br />

could<br />

forty percent or more that authorized leave could serve<br />

this<br />

a rehabilitative tool throughout their confinement. With<br />

as<br />

nearly one hundred percent, authorized leavewould appear<br />

129


helpful during the pre-release phase. For those<br />

potentially<br />

who have intact marriages, the same policy and<br />

prisoners<br />

would serve as a superior alternative to conjugal<br />

procedures<br />

(End of Dr. John's statement)<br />

visits.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECONDS:<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation work with the<br />

That<br />

law enforcement and other community resources in the<br />

courts,<br />

of rehabilitation programs for offenders and<br />

development<br />

offenders, and that those in need of vocational re-<br />

potential<br />

habi litation service8 8hould be served.<br />

there should be an expansion of services to the persons<br />

That<br />

prisons and other correctional institutions so that by<br />

in<br />

all prisoners below the age of 60 would be referred<br />

1975<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation routinely, with later screen-<br />

to<br />

to exclude those net feasible for vocational rehabili-<br />

ing<br />

services.<br />

tation<br />

Economic Opportunity Programs<br />

of the fastest growing areas in government is in mann<br />

One<br />

programs. However, there has been a greater increase in legis<br />

power<br />

authorizing new programs than there has been an increase in<br />

lation<br />

to pay for the programs. The then President of the United<br />

funding<br />

Lyndon B. Johnson, in 1968 made an agreement with Congress<br />

States,<br />

reduce the federal budget for civilian programs by $6 billion.<br />

to<br />

devastating cut was made principally in the manpower programs.<br />

This<br />

rehabilitation, education, health, welfare, and other<br />

Vocational<br />

were also crippled. It is likely to be years before the<br />

programs<br />

made by this cut will have healed. Perhaps a manifestation<br />

wounds<br />

the cut was the rioting which tore through our cities in the recent<br />

of<br />

Disadvantaged people were promised greatly improved govern-<br />

summer.<br />

services. When Federal budgetary restrictions reduced the<br />

mental<br />

the demonstrations and attacks began. Young militant<br />

programs<br />

people fouled their own nests, burned their own neighbor-<br />

aggrieved<br />

found that the dead were so often their own brothers.<br />

hoods,<br />

Washington State energetic efforts by many governmental<br />

In<br />

at many levels have been directed to help relieve the poverty<br />

officials<br />

suffering of the disadvantaged. The state government, particularly,<br />

and<br />

been in the forefront in this respect, and activity has not been<br />

has<br />

only to agencies with special responsibilities in this area.<br />

limited<br />

would expect, for example, that the Board Against Discrimination<br />

We<br />

the Office of Economic Opportunity would work vigorously to help<br />

and<br />

races in the state. Most. other states, however have not<br />

minority<br />

comparable activity on the part of high government officials<br />

shown<br />

help the minorities, the disadvantaged, and the handicapped.<br />

to<br />

130


the efforts of these and other governmental officials, the<br />

Through<br />

of Washington is projecting an image of an aggressive, humane,<br />

State<br />

educated people striving for law and order with justice.<br />

THE COISSION RECOENDS:<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitatio in its involve-<br />

That<br />

in community action planning for services in poor neigh-<br />

ment<br />

arrange for poor people themselves to participate<br />

borhoods,<br />

the planning.<br />

in<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation work with<br />

That<br />

agencies to find means of delivering vocational<br />

other<br />

and educational services in the rural areas<br />

rehabilitation<br />

Washington.<br />

of<br />

WASHINGTON APATHY OR ACTION? a 1968 report of<br />

URBAN<br />

Governor's Advisory Council on Urban Affairs, A. Ludlow Kramer,<br />

the<br />

Secretary of State, Chairman, contains the following statement:<br />

a person makes a living is a vital determinant of his<br />

How<br />

and social well-being. Almost every .person<br />

individual<br />

the need to contribute to his own welfare through<br />

feels<br />

own efforts. A viable society must provide an oppor-<br />

his<br />

tunity for every person to fulfill this basic need.<br />

problems have drastic social impact. Much of<br />

Employment<br />

alienation of a minority person, for example, is<br />

the<br />

by the nature of his work. Those that are forced<br />

caused<br />

of employment or denied participation in progressive,<br />

out<br />

jobs feel a resentment toward society that has<br />

meaningful<br />

itself in racial violence.<br />

manifested<br />

male members ofa family who cannot adequately support<br />

Those<br />

families feel a sense of shame and inadequacy that<br />

.their<br />

some to leave their homes. Consequently, their<br />

causes<br />

grow up without fathers and, more often than not<br />

children<br />

into the.same cycle of unemployment, frustration<br />

graduate<br />

desertion.<br />

and<br />

not only provide security in the present to the indivi-<br />

Jobs<br />

they insure the future for society as well. Some of<br />

dual,<br />

most vital growth services--health care, education,<br />

the<br />

planning, and administration of all types--requir<br />

housing,<br />

increases in manpower. Not only do people need<br />

tremendous<br />

but the job market needs people. The greatest social<br />

jobs,<br />

benefit will result from bringing these two together.<br />

there have been measurable gains in the personal<br />

Although<br />

of many of our state's citizens, the conditions of<br />

income<br />

of our citizens--particularly many Blacks, Mexican-<br />

many<br />

and American Indians--is one of deprivation and<br />

Americans,<br />

hopelessness,<br />

131


z<br />

132<br />

..i.


eason for this cond.i..t.i.on lies in three a.reas that need<br />

The<br />

concentrated attackunemployment, underemployment, and<br />

a<br />

lack of entrepreneurial skills.<br />

is the most obvious of the three, and the<br />

Underemployment<br />

that the Federal government and private enterprise<br />

one<br />

the nation have begun to attack jointly. The<br />

throughout<br />

is not the lack of jobs. We have a rapidly<br />

problem<br />

economy in Washington and new jobs are opening<br />

expanding<br />

than employers can fill them.<br />

faster<br />

acute problem is that unemployment tends to be concen-<br />

An<br />

instead of spread throughout the community. In<br />

trated,<br />

unemployment concentrates in core city areas<br />

Washington,<br />

in isolated rural areas. The unemployed usually live<br />

and<br />

these areas, and their inability to pay for innovative<br />

in<br />

in their community schools, adequate housing and<br />

programs<br />

governmental services tends to perpetuate unem-<br />

sufficient<br />

ployment.<br />

concentration adds to the problem in several ways, For<br />

The<br />

those on relief in the Central Area of Seattle<br />

instance,<br />

find Jobs in the rapidly expanding job market in<br />

might<br />

but they can neither afford to move to Everett<br />

Everett,<br />

buy available housing if they could get there. These<br />

nor<br />

cannot support the special levies necessary for their<br />

areas<br />

to develop programs designed to resolve the unique<br />

schools<br />

of problems of the community's children, so<br />

configuration<br />

young grow up untrained and, consequently, unable to<br />

the<br />

a job. The inability to get to a health professional,<br />

hold<br />

fact that none live nearby, means that many people<br />

the<br />

physically hampered in their ability to work.<br />

become<br />

those places where.the unemployed can get jobs, artificial<br />

In<br />

and discrimination by employers can prevent these<br />

.standards<br />

from being employed. Lack of adequate education or<br />

people<br />

skills can pose a barrier. Legal problems, like<br />

vocational<br />

threat of garnishment and the inability to be eligible<br />

the<br />

bonding, also hinder the employment of the unemployed.<br />

for<br />

need for supervision for their children keeps many<br />

The<br />

now receiving welfare payments from working or<br />

mothers<br />

engaging in training programs.<br />

akin to the problem of unemployment, and almost<br />

Closely<br />

present in the same area, is the problem of underem-<br />

always<br />

Strictly defined, underemployment is a part-time<br />

ployment.<br />

or a full-time job that pays less than $3,000 a year.<br />

job<br />

major problem of underemployment is that it discourages<br />

One<br />

employment. Our system of taking a dollar of welfare<br />

full<br />

every dollar of income discourages people on welfare<br />

for<br />

taking any type of a part-time job. The fact that many<br />

from<br />

of the unemployed can only look forward to being underemployed<br />

133


the effort it takes to find a job. They said<br />

discourages<br />

us, "Why fight discrimination, lack of training, trans-<br />

to<br />

away from home, and the physical effort involved<br />

portation<br />

a mere $3,000 a year?"<br />

for<br />

a broader definition, underemployment becomes an even<br />

In<br />

critical problem. If we define underemployment as<br />

more<br />

at a job below one's apparent potential capability,<br />

working<br />

becomes a problem of all society, not just those of low<br />

it<br />

A free enterprise system demands a commitment to<br />

income.<br />

world of work, and if such a system is to flourish it<br />

the<br />

provide an opportunity for individuals to fulfill<br />

must<br />

by working within it. Thus, make-work programs,<br />

themselves<br />

in 1938 or 1968 are not the answer. Our society<br />

whether<br />

grave domestic problems involving population, unem-<br />

faces<br />

education, health, housing, and the physical en-<br />

ployment,<br />

The unemployed and the underemployed must share<br />

vironment.<br />

meeting those challenges, instead of being part of the<br />

in<br />

challenge.<br />

third area of the job problem, and one related both<br />

The<br />

unemployment and underemployment is the lack of entre-<br />

to<br />

skills among many of Washington's residents.<br />

preneurial<br />

many of the unemployed and underemployed--especially<br />

While<br />

minorities and ethnic minorities--can now obtain<br />

racial<br />

for the first time to open their own business, they<br />

capital<br />

not have managerial skills to operate a business with<br />

do<br />

assistance. It is not part of the family nor cultural<br />

expert<br />

of the disadvantaged to have learned capitalistic<br />

background<br />

i.e., experience in selling inexpensive items,<br />

skills;<br />

in business already, experience with budgeting<br />

relatives<br />

investing one's allowance, and enrollment in college<br />

and<br />

business school courses where entrepreneurship is taught<br />

and<br />

experts.<br />

by<br />

given.training in entrepreneurship, however, they could<br />

If<br />

become managers and entrepreneurs in the private<br />

possibly<br />

system. The unemployed could start hiring the<br />

enterprise<br />

around them and the underemployed could find new<br />

unemployed<br />

in being their own boss and having their future<br />

fulfillment<br />

only by their own talents. The lack of Black<br />

limited<br />

Indian capitalism, and Mexican-American capital-<br />

capitalism,<br />

is a shortcoming Washington must begin to overcome.<br />

ism<br />

any discussion of job training and opportunities, one<br />

In<br />

face squarely the related problems of unemployment and<br />

must<br />

underemployment.<br />

134


problem of a sufficient number of jobs in Washington is<br />

The<br />

One facet is-discrimination° The unemployment<br />

manyfold.<br />

among nonwhites is- twice that of whites. Practically<br />

rate<br />

the administrative jobs.are held by whites. Orientals<br />

all<br />

been fairly successful, but Indians, Mexican-Americans,<br />

have<br />

Negroes continue to face job discrimination in many areas<br />

and<br />

the state. The elimination of discrimination does not<br />

of<br />

sweeping changes in our economy or massive additions<br />

require<br />

our governmental agencies. 'It can be accomplished only<br />

to<br />

the will to do so can be generated. The leadership must<br />

if<br />

come from the employer community of Washington State.<br />

AND VIOLENCE IN WASHINGTON STATE, printed in 1969 by<br />

RACE<br />

Commission on the Causes and the Prevention of Civil Disorders,<br />

the<br />

A. Ludlow Kramer, Chairman, contains the following statement:<br />

underemployment and lack of entrepreneurial<br />

Unemployment,<br />

are major reasons for social frustration and hos-<br />

skills<br />

within the ghettos of Washington. Employment<br />

tilities<br />

interact with almost all the others we have<br />

problems<br />

health care, welfare transportation, education,<br />

mentioned:<br />

employment is essential to good housing, higher educa<br />

Good<br />

tion, and most important--to self-pride.<br />

is no lack of government and state concern about<br />

There<br />

for the disadvantaged. Indeed, we found a<br />

employment<br />

array of overlapping, competing and necessarily<br />

confusing<br />

programs. Therefore, we recommend that the State<br />

wasteful<br />

of Employment Security bring together represent.<br />

Department<br />

of the various employment services to establish<br />

tatives<br />

agreed upon procedures to help end the current<br />

jointly<br />

duplication of activities.<br />

wasteful<br />

necessity, governmental action to resolve employment<br />

By<br />

is financed largely at the federal level. Since<br />

problems<br />

the federal government has adequate funds for such a<br />

only<br />

social problem, we support this trend and its expan-<br />

major<br />

sion.<br />

Facilities and Workshops<br />

following chart shows that none of the rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

in Washington State go to special rehabilitation<br />

appropriations<br />

although 7.9 percent of the rehabilitation funds in the<br />

facilities<br />

go for that purpose, Figures are from State Vocational<br />

nation<br />

Agency Program Data, FiscalYear 1967, Rehabilitation<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Administration, Washington, D. C.<br />

Services<br />

135<br />

'


OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY<br />

PERCENT<br />

YEAR 1967<br />

FISCAL<br />

Administration<br />

and Placement<br />

Guidance<br />

Services<br />

Case<br />

Business Enterprises<br />

Small<br />

Workshops<br />

Facilities<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Percent Totals<br />

Washington U.S.<br />

4.7%<br />

7.5%<br />

26.2<br />

43.5<br />

59.5<br />

43.3<br />

0.5<br />

0.7<br />

1.2<br />

5.0<br />

7.9<br />

0<br />

should be made to reduce administrative cost. The state should<br />

Efforts<br />

rehabilitation facilities to assist the clients.<br />

have<br />

Planning Commission considered the need in this state<br />

The<br />

two such rehabilitation facilities. One that was considered was<br />

for<br />

Regional Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center. The other was an<br />

the<br />

Evaluation and Service Center. The Commissionrecommends<br />

Employment<br />

that Washington State have both. A description of each follows:<br />

Comprehensive RehabilitationCenter<br />

statement concerns the Comprehensive Rehabilitation<br />

This<br />

It has been proposed that the State of Washington have a<br />

Center.<br />

rehabilitation center within its borders. There is no<br />

comprehensive<br />

knowledge of such a center in Washington State or within 2,000<br />

present<br />

The best known centers of this kind are at Johnstown, Pennsyl-<br />

miles.<br />

Hot Springs, Arkansas; Fisherville, Virginia; and Warm Springs,<br />

vania;<br />

Georgia.<br />

a comprehensive rehabilitation center is a<br />

Essentially,<br />

where severely handicapped people may go for a variety of rehab-<br />

place<br />

services. Almost any service which is needed can be provided<br />

ilitation<br />

the site. It has training and evaluation, occupational therapy,<br />

on<br />

care, and the like. It has been said that much of the<br />

residential<br />

which the severely handicapped people get in a setting of<br />

learning<br />

nature comes from other clients outside the formal training pro<br />

this<br />

Clients are motivated by each other in the evenings, at meals,<br />

grams.<br />

the residence halls, to want to become whole and useful and self-<br />

in<br />

abundantly. The variety of formal programs of<br />

sustaining--to.live<br />

which go from occupational therapy, to literacy training, to<br />

training<br />

psychiatric therapy, to accounting procedures, to physiotherapy<br />

group<br />

all necessary for certain groups of these severely handicapped<br />

are<br />

people.<br />

a person has been badly hurt in an industrial accident,<br />

If<br />

partially paralyzed in an auto wreck, or felled by a stroke, can<br />

or<br />

services be provided which would make him become self-supporting,<br />

136<br />

9.1%


justifying the rather substantial costs of rehabilitation<br />

therefore<br />

Can success in rehabilitating the severely handicapped<br />

service?<br />

be used to motivate less severely, handicapped people so that<br />

people<br />

too would be motivated to prepare themselves for employment?<br />

they<br />

which tie work evaluation and training with physica<br />

Services<br />

for the severely physically disabled serve the state as<br />

restoration<br />

as the client. Such a comprehensive center is recommended by<br />

well<br />

Federal government which provides 90 percent of the total cost.<br />

the<br />

a center costs about i0 million dollars to construct and two<br />

Such<br />

dollars a year to operate.<br />

million<br />

Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation has<br />

The<br />

having a regional comprehensive rehabilitation center in<br />

considered<br />

State. There have been field trips made by members of<br />

Washington<br />

Commission, by staff members, and by consultants to outstanding<br />

the<br />

comprehensive rehabilitation centers in other states.<br />

Hot Springs Rehabilitation Center, Hot Springs, Arkansas,<br />

The<br />

visited by Mrs. Beryl Gridley and Mrs. Helen Powers, members of<br />

was<br />

Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation, Mrs. Jean<br />

the<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation, and staff members David C, Carson<br />

Mead,<br />

and Allan Wood have also visited this center.<br />

the Pennsylvania Rehabilitation Center, $ohnstown,<br />

Visiting<br />

the Institute for the Crippled and Disabled, and the<br />

Pennsylvania,<br />

of Rehabilitation Medicine, both in New York City, were<br />

Institute<br />

following: Dr. Alfred O. Adams, Messrs. Clarence T. Freeman,<br />

the<br />

P. Holden, John E. Keene, John Merrill, and Robert C, Ridder.<br />

Donald<br />

Donal R. Sparkman visited these.centers earlier. Project Director<br />

Dr.<br />

C. Carson; Pete Shepherd Central Budget Agency; and Peyson<br />

David<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation, toured the centers with members<br />

Jeynes,<br />

of the Planning Commission.<br />

Georgia Rehabilitation Center in Warm Springs, Georgia,<br />

The<br />

visited by Vice-Chairman Roger C. Larson, Project Director David<br />

was<br />

C. Carson and the. following:<br />

W. Burchill, Ass't Commissioner, Employment Security<br />

A.<br />

Department<br />

Kelleher, Ph.D., Ass't Supervisor, Division of<br />

Daniel<br />

Department of Institutions<br />

Planning,<br />

D. Lane, M.D., Chief Medical Consultant, Medical<br />

Jo<br />

Department of Labor and Industries<br />

Section,<br />

D. Pope, Ass't Director, Divisionof Social Services<br />

W.<br />

of Public Assistance<br />

Department<br />

H. Leahy, M. D., State Medical Consultant, Division of<br />

R.<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Vocational<br />

137


August 1968, Project Director David C. Carson and Voca-<br />

In<br />

Rehabilitation Planning Supervisor Irvin Bryan had a meeting<br />

tional<br />

Juneau Alask with Mr. Edward L. Chouinard, Regional Assistant<br />

in<br />

Rehabilitation Services Administration, San Francisco;<br />

Commissioner,<br />

Director Keith J. Anderson; and Director of the Office of<br />

Project<br />

Rehabilitation C. M. Craft, .to discuss-the role of the<br />

Vocational<br />

of Alaska in a comprehensive rehabilitation center in the State<br />

State<br />

Washington. In December 1968, Dan Schausten, Project Director in<br />

of<br />

of the Governor's Planning Committee on Vocational Rehabilita-<br />

Oregon<br />

reported his state's actions, with a request that Oregon citizens<br />

tion,<br />

be served in a center in Washington.<br />

is no comprehensive rehabilitation center in the<br />

There<br />

of Washington or contiguous states at this time to serve the<br />

State<br />

severely handicapped clients of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

state funds be appropriated for a regional Comprehensive<br />

That<br />

Center in the State of Washington.<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Employment Evaluation and Service Center in Washington State<br />

1968 amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act<br />

The<br />

became law July 7, 1968 when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed<br />

which<br />

authorized money to the states for a Vocational Evaluation and<br />

it,<br />

Adjustment Program. Funds for this purpose included $50,000,000<br />

Work<br />

fiscal year 1969; $75,000,000 for 1970; $i00,000,000 for 1971.<br />

for<br />

each succeeding fiscal year only such sums may be appropriated<br />

For<br />

the Congress may hereafter authorize by law. The Federal share<br />

as<br />

the costs of such Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Programs<br />

of<br />

is 90 percent. The state and/or local.share is only i0 percent.<br />

is proposed there be established in the State of Washing-<br />

It<br />

a Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Center in Seattle to<br />

ton<br />

operational in July, 1969. It is proposed further that a<br />

become<br />

such center be opene d in Spokane in January, 1970. The third<br />

second<br />

would be opened in Tacoma in July, 1971. Subsequently, other<br />

center<br />

would be established in other urban centers of the state.<br />

centers<br />

centers would be operated by the Vocational Rehabili-<br />

These<br />

Division but would be planned so that their principal service<br />

tation<br />

be to the disadvantaged and handicapped clients of several<br />

would<br />

It is assumed that the state has a special responsibility<br />

agencies.<br />

try to rehabilitate those who are wholly or partly dependent on it<br />

to<br />

one of its political subdivisions. The next eight pages are<br />

and/or<br />

of a statement of the Project Director tothe Planning Commission<br />

part<br />

December 7, 1969. Public Law 90-391, the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

on<br />

Amendments of 1968, states that "'Evaluation and work adjustment<br />

Act<br />

include, as appropriate in each case, such services as--<br />

services'<br />

138


a preliminary diagnostic study to determine that the individual is<br />

"(A)<br />

has an employment handicap, and that services are needed;<br />

disadvantaged,<br />

a thorough diagnostic study consisting of a comprehensive evalua-<br />

"(B)<br />

of pertinent medical, psychological, vocational, educational, cultural,<br />

tion<br />

and environmental factors which bear on the individual's handicap to<br />

social,<br />

and rehabilitation potential including, to the degree needed, an<br />

employment<br />

of the individual's personality, intelligene level, educational<br />

evaluation<br />

work experience, vocational aptitudes and interests, personal<br />

achievements,<br />

social adjustments, employment opportunities, and other pertinent data<br />

and<br />

in determining the nature and scope of services needed;<br />

helpful<br />

services to appraise the individual's patterns of work behavior and<br />

"(C)<br />

to acquire occupational skills, and to develop work attitudes, work<br />

ability<br />

work tolerance, and social and behavior patterns suitable for suc-<br />

habits,<br />

job performance, including the utilization of work, simulated or real,<br />

cessful<br />

assess and develop the individual's capacities to perform adequately in<br />

to<br />

work environment;<br />

a<br />

any other goods or services provided to a disadvantaged individual,<br />

"(D)<br />

(in accordance with regulations of the Secretary) to be necessary<br />

determined<br />

and which are provided for the purpose of, ascertaining the nature of the<br />

for,<br />

to employment and whether it may reasonably be expected the indivi-<br />

handicap<br />

can benefit from vocational rehabilitation services, or other services<br />

dual<br />

to disadvantaged individuals;<br />

available<br />

"(E) outreach, referral, and advocacy; and<br />

"(F) the administration of these evaluation and work adjustment services."<br />

the Act, disadvantaged individual is defined to mean (i) the mentally and<br />

In<br />

handicapped individuals traditionally served by Vocational Rehabili-<br />

physically<br />

(2) individuals disadvantaged by reason of their youth or advanced<br />

tation,<br />

low educational attainments, ethnic or cultural factors, prison or<br />

age,<br />

records, or other conditions which constitute a barrier to employ-<br />

delinquency<br />

and (3) other members of their families when the provision of vocational<br />

ment,<br />

to family members is necessary for the rehabilitation<br />

rehabilitationservices<br />

an individual described in clause (i) or (2).<br />

of<br />

prototype of a center such as mentioned in the Act is one .operated<br />

The<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the State of Georgia and<br />

by<br />

with funds from the U. S. Office of Economic Opportunity in 1966.<br />

initiated<br />

center is located near downtown Atlanta, Georgia. The Atlanta Employ-<br />

This<br />

Evaluation and Service Center is designed to be a complete community of<br />

ment<br />

and rehabilitation service agencies brought together under one roof with<br />

social<br />

single purpose--serving the client. In short, it is a shopping center which,<br />

a<br />

turn, is in the midst of a deprived area. A former bowling alley was re-<br />

in<br />

and converted to house social workers, rehabilitation counselors,<br />

novated<br />

service personnel, public school teachers, a workshop, sophisticated<br />

employment<br />

evaluation services, medical services, psychological services,a<br />

vocational<br />

and the auxiliary units to keep these service activities functioning<br />

cafeteria<br />

properly. This complex is designed to fill voids in community services and<br />

139


deliver services on a timely basis to many individuals who have not been<br />

to<br />

them. The evaluation component is unique and enables other services<br />

receiving<br />

function at the proper time. It also identifies what services should be<br />

to<br />

the client.<br />

provided<br />

center has been visited by Vice-Chairman Roger Larson of the Plan-<br />

This<br />

Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation, and by Project Director David<br />

ning<br />

Carson of the Planning Commission. In addition, the following individuals<br />

C.<br />

sent from Washington State to consider the services being provided in<br />

were<br />

Atlanta:<br />

W. Burchill, Ass't. Commissioner, Employment Security Department<br />

A.<br />

Kelleher, Ph.D., Ass't. Supervisor, Division of Planning,<br />

Daniel<br />

of Institutions<br />

Department<br />

D. Lane, M. D., Chief Medical Consultant, Medical Section,<br />

J.<br />

of Labor and Industries<br />

Department<br />

D. Pope, Ass't. Director, Division of Social Services,<br />

W.<br />

of Public Assistance<br />

Department<br />

H. Leahy, M. D., State Medical Consultant, Division of<br />

R.<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

is likely that we are in .agreement that the handicapped dis-<br />

It<br />

citizens of the State of Washington would be significantly helped<br />

advantaged<br />

a Employment Evaluation and Service Center. We are also in agreement, I<br />

by<br />

that such a center would need to be modified somewhat for the needs<br />

think,<br />

our citizens. We can use the experience developed in Atlanta in order to<br />

of<br />

a better program here.<br />

have<br />

the past decade or two, vocational rehabilitation agencies have<br />

During<br />

considerable knowledge and competence in the field of evaluating an<br />

developed<br />

potential skills and his ability to use these skills in the<br />

individual's<br />

place. These agencies have also developed an expertise in bringing<br />

market<br />

of service, in a proper combination with timeliness, to bear on<br />

avariety<br />

individual's problems. Their work, however, has been confined largely to<br />

an<br />

individuals with physical or mental impairments.<br />

in the field of vocational rehabilitation and vocational<br />

Activities<br />

have been on the increase in recent years, but the failure to<br />

evaluation<br />

full utilization of the potential skills of number of population<br />

achieve<br />

in our society has resulted in social and economic problems of great<br />

groups<br />

With the emphasis on full manpower utilization, the selection<br />

proportion.<br />

evaluation of trainee candidates assumes a role of major importance. There<br />

and<br />

a number of population groups in which the need for effective vocational<br />

are<br />

has been evidenced: the under-privileged, the technologically dis-<br />

selection<br />

and the elderly, as well as the physically or mentally handicapped<br />

placed,<br />

traditionally served by vocational rehabilitation agencies.<br />

persons<br />

observes that many of the definable groups have been lumped into a<br />

One<br />

category termed the "Culturally Deprived." The mentally ill, the<br />

larger<br />

mentally retarded, the public offenders on probation and parole, the American<br />

140


attempting to live off a reservation, the migrant without deep roots<br />

Indian<br />

this or any other stable culture, the recipient of Public Assistance--<br />

in<br />

all can be helped by a Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Center.<br />

is a great need for competence in the area of evaluation of po-<br />

There<br />

vocational skills and the ability to use these skills. There is a<br />

tential<br />

to develop a system that would meet the individuai needs of indigent<br />

need<br />

as well as to have characteristics that would meet the needs of many<br />

persons,<br />

agencies.<br />

problems of arranging client movement from appointment to ap-<br />

Chronic<br />

awaiting results and reports, and maintaining intra- and inter-<br />

pointment,<br />

lines of communication have been experienced by the counselors of the<br />

agency<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation, case workers of the Department of<br />

Division<br />

Assistance, special education teachers, probation and parole officers,<br />

Public<br />

workers in mental hospitals, and many others try to provide services<br />

social<br />

this target population. This lack of coordination of effort frequently<br />

to<br />

in case failure and a wastage of case service funds. These negative<br />

results<br />

show that Vocational Rehabilitation clients, and especially<br />

experiences<br />

seriously impaired, benefit most when services available to them have<br />

those<br />

direction and coordination. The project planners intended to demon-<br />

common<br />

that this direction and coordination could be achieved most effectively<br />

strate<br />

bringing together trained evaluative teams acting in concert with the<br />

by<br />

client.<br />

impaired<br />

too often people in the helping professions have experienced fail-<br />

All<br />

in dealing with the severely disabled client because of the lack of an<br />

ure<br />

comprehensive evaluation prior to an actual vocational plan being<br />

adequate<br />

This project is geared to provide intensive evaluation of the<br />

implemented.<br />

having serious vocational impairments, and extends far beyond the<br />

client<br />

of resources otherwise available.<br />

scope<br />

referral to the center would have to be made through recognized .agencies,<br />

A<br />

public and non-profit which wouid have a contractual .agreement with the<br />

both<br />

center and be providing one or more of the following services:<br />

Services<br />

Casework<br />

CounselingServices<br />

Counseling and Training<br />

Vocational<br />

Experience Program<br />

Work<br />

Employment Placement Program<br />

such as Seattle, Spokane and Tacoma will each have many dozens<br />

Cities<br />

such agencies.<br />

of<br />

of the disadvantaged and handicapped people who are unemployed will<br />

Many<br />

amenable to help only if they receive rewards that are tangible, and fre-<br />

be<br />

They should be given a free hot lunch daily as many will be inade-<br />

quent.<br />

nourished. They should also be given a snack both morning and after-<br />

quately<br />

noon. They should receive money enough for public transportation to and from<br />

141


center. Those who are heads of households which contain dependent<br />

the<br />

may also be given a modest amount daily for a child care allowance.<br />

children<br />

center such as this would need to have fulltime medical, prosthetic,<br />

A<br />

dental care for those who come to it. Most of the people who are described<br />

and<br />

have both medical and dental problems.. Although'an employment evalua-<br />

above<br />

center is not medically oriented, those people with dental and medical<br />

tion<br />

which can be treated should have them treated while undergoing<br />

limitations<br />

employment evaluation or the work adjustment.<br />

the<br />

of those who come to the center have serious problems with literacy.<br />

Many<br />

education is an important part of such a center. A brush-up course<br />

Special<br />

literacy and math would be particularly useful to some of these people.<br />

in<br />

would be made at the center for continuation of this schooling<br />

Arrangements<br />

later for those who leave the center.<br />

center such as this needs to have a staff of indigenous aides who<br />

A<br />

be helpful to the clients. These aides.should reflect the predominantly<br />

will<br />

and other characteristics of the clients being served. If the client<br />

racial<br />

come to the center as scheduled, or call in, the aide is routinely<br />

doesn't<br />

to the home of the client to see what is the matter.. If the client<br />

dispatched<br />

several days to the center for evaluation he is likely to continue com-<br />

comes<br />

There must be enough concern and reward and attention to the client<br />

ing.<br />

the first few days to assure that he will come. The client is probably<br />

for<br />

comfortable with the aide than he is with the professional staff member.<br />

more<br />

the aides can be selected on the basis that they have empathy, are warm<br />

If<br />

genuine helpful people, the client is most likely to be helped.<br />

client should always be taught that he is there for a vocational<br />

The<br />

rather than to be provided with a .dole. He is there temporarily for<br />

reason<br />

evaluation that may last only two weeks or a work adjustment training that<br />

an<br />

last a few months. He is there until he can be evaluated, trained and<br />

may<br />

placed on a job. The center is vocationally oriented.<br />

The objectives of the center are listed as follows:<br />

To establish harmonious cooperative relations with all<br />

i.<br />

private, and non-profit agencies whose purposes<br />

public,<br />

to assist individuals in need of comprehensive<br />

are<br />

services.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

To provide comprehensive vocational evaluation for the<br />

2.<br />

limited, emotionally disturbed, educable<br />

physically<br />

retarded, and the socially and culturally<br />

mentally<br />

deprived.<br />

To develop new and improved techniques for dealing<br />

3.<br />

the problems of the handicapped, and socially<br />

with<br />

culturally deprived by unity of efforts amid a<br />

and<br />

of resources.<br />

diversity<br />

142


To provide individual attention to the individual<br />

4.<br />

of the client.<br />

need<br />

way to summarize what has been stated to this point One<br />

be to show<br />

copies would<br />

the pages from a handbook given the clients of<br />

the Atlanta Employ-<br />

at<br />

Evaluation and Service Center. Perhaps the center in Seattle<br />

ment<br />

in other<br />

cities in the State of Washington or<br />

be somewhat different; however, we<br />

will<br />

can<br />

an idea from this handbook distributed in Atlanta. The Atlanta Center<br />

get<br />

the prototype for<br />

is<br />

legislation which appropriates monies for the<br />

centers<br />

throughout the United States. (End of statement to the Planning Commission)<br />

MY WHO'S WHO AT AEESC<br />

Referral Agent<br />

Coun sel or<br />

Caseworker<br />

TOWER Evaluator.<br />

Adjustment<br />

Work<br />

Coordinator<br />

Education<br />

Special<br />

Teacher<br />

handbook is your guide during your stay at<br />

This<br />

Atlanta Employment Evaluation and Service<br />

the<br />

In it are answers to many questions you<br />

Center.<br />

ask during the time you are here. Also<br />

might<br />

are facts to help you know more about<br />

included<br />

Center.<br />

the<br />

is YOUR handbook. Please keep it handy<br />

This<br />

ready reference while you are here.<br />

for<br />

143<br />

WHO RUNS THE CENTER?<br />

Atlanta Employment Evaluation and Service<br />

The<br />

is run by the Georgia State Department of<br />

Center<br />

Education, Office of Rehabilitation Services.<br />

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CENTER?<br />

purpose of this Center is to find The known<br />

your<br />

hidden skills and to help you get<br />

and job..<br />

a<br />

ABOUT THE PERSON WHO REFERRED<br />

HOW<br />

TO THE CENTER?<br />

ME<br />

REFERRAL AGENT felt that Your interests<br />

your<br />

be best served by sending would<br />

to our<br />

you<br />

The person who referred Center. remains<br />

you<br />

in you, and will get a report when interested<br />

you<br />

He will play a big part in helping to<br />

leave.<br />

a job for you when your Evaluation has<br />

find<br />

ended.<br />

can be sure that the person who referred<br />

You<br />

to us and the staff at our Center will be<br />

you<br />

working with you to help you get a job.<br />

WHAT CAN EXPECT FROM THE CENTER?<br />

CASEWORKER was your first contact with<br />

Your<br />

Center. She will remain assigned to<br />

the<br />

you<br />

will provide services to you during and<br />

your<br />

here. Your Caseworker will help arrange<br />

stay<br />

for you outside the Center as<br />

appointments<br />

and will answer your questions about<br />

needed<br />

aid, surplus food, family planning, clothing<br />

legal<br />

child care, public housing, etc.<br />

needs,


COUNSELOR will meet with you soon after<br />

Your<br />

come to the Center and often during your<br />

you<br />

here. He is interested in you as a person;<br />

stay<br />

on the job, within family, and in your<br />

your<br />

He will talk with you about different<br />

community.<br />

you are interested in, and tell you how you<br />

jobs<br />

doing with your tests here in our Center.<br />

are<br />

may talk over your personal problems with<br />

You<br />

your Counselor and talk about progress<br />

your<br />

getting a job.<br />

toward<br />

Counselor will arrange services that he feels<br />

Your<br />

be. helpfu to you. You will probably NOT be<br />

will<br />

into ALL of the service areas at the<br />

scheduled<br />

but will be scheduled for SEVERAl of<br />

Center,<br />

services, depending on your needs and yours<br />

these<br />

desires.<br />

CENTER PHYSICIAN will give you a physical<br />

The<br />

exam unless the agency who referred sent us<br />

you<br />

current medical information.<br />

PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT will give you<br />

The<br />

so tests that can we learn about interests,<br />

your<br />

level, and generally, how you figure things<br />

reading<br />

out.<br />

WORK POTENTIAL (TOWER) section will<br />

The<br />

you many give kinds of tasks do. Many will be<br />

to<br />

to you, familiar but others be ENTIRELY<br />

will<br />

to you. By watching you as you work on<br />

NEW<br />

tasks, your TOWER Evaluator will be able<br />

these<br />

tell what your true potentials and skills are.<br />

to<br />

144<br />

WORK ADJUSTMENT section will give you<br />

The<br />

chance to show how you work in an actual job<br />

a<br />

Your Coordinator will see how quick and<br />

setting.<br />

well you can complete tasks. Hewill how<br />

see<br />

you get along with fellow workers and with<br />

how<br />

and if you ask for other tasks when<br />

supervisors,<br />

you finish a job.<br />

EDUCATION is offered to all clients who<br />

SPECIAL<br />

not complete high school and who want a chance<br />

did<br />

brush up on reading and math. Over 100 clients<br />

to<br />

been able to get a High School Equivalency<br />

have<br />

because they worked hard in Special<br />

Certificate<br />

classes.<br />

Education<br />

EVALUA TOR<br />

Your<br />

the center. The<br />

at<br />

Aide's biggest<br />

Evaluator<br />

is to help you get<br />

job<br />

special appointments<br />

to<br />

the Center.<br />

outside<br />

Center is a<br />

This<br />

place. You<br />

big<br />

get "trned<br />

might<br />

during your<br />

around"<br />

days here. If<br />

first<br />

do get lost, or<br />

you<br />

know where to go<br />

don't<br />

ask your Evaluator<br />

next,<br />

Aide.<br />

AIDE can be a big help to you<br />

Lost?<br />

addition to the service areas already described,<br />

In<br />

services may be offered to you here at the<br />

other<br />

or through one of the many related agencies<br />

Center<br />

cooperate with our program.<br />

who


WHAT DOES THE CENTER EXPECT OF/VIE?<br />

DO YOUR BEST<br />

your first day here at our Center, your<br />

During<br />

will give you a schedule card and Counselor<br />

name<br />

a<br />

tag.<br />

sci'IEDgLE CARD will show Your where to go<br />

during you<br />

day. Keep it with you at all times and<br />

each<br />

it from time to time and make check that you are<br />

sure<br />

the correct section of the Center.<br />

in<br />

Schedule Crd<br />

145<br />

NAE TAG tellsothers who Your<br />

are, and shows<br />

which<br />

you<br />

team you are a part of. It will also help<br />

Center<br />

to learn the name of your fellow clients at the<br />

you<br />

Center.<br />

Time<br />

Clock<br />

TIME CARD is used<br />

The<br />

the same way that time<br />

in<br />

are used in regular<br />

cards<br />

You will be<br />

Businesses.<br />

how to use it<br />

shown<br />

during your first<br />

I:roperly<br />

here. Don't forget to<br />

day<br />

In" when you<br />

"Punch<br />

here each mornlng<br />

get<br />

to "Punch Out"<br />

and<br />

you leave every<br />

when<br />

This is our<br />

afternoon.<br />

way of seeing if<br />

main<br />

come to work every<br />

you.<br />

day and on time.


DEPENDABLE<br />

BEING<br />

for any reason you are unable to come to the<br />

If<br />

call your Counselor or Social Worker before<br />

Center,<br />

A.M. If you arrive AFTER 9:00 A.M., report<br />

9:00<br />

directly to your counselor.<br />

We want to see COOPERATION how act and<br />

you<br />

you do a job. Do you "pitch in" and do a good<br />

how<br />

Do you let others keep you from doing your<br />

job?<br />

What happens if you are asked to do a job you<br />

best?<br />

like? Do you don't take pride in doing your best?<br />

way you go about doing a job gives us the answers<br />

The<br />

to these questions and tells us what kind of<br />

answers<br />

you are.<br />

worker<br />

ELSE DO NEED TO KNOW?<br />

WHAT<br />

STUDENT LOUNGE is open during your Ireaks.<br />

The<br />

can sit down and talk with your:friends and<br />

You<br />

clients, buy cold drinks, and candy.<br />

fellow<br />

TELEPttONES are located in the Student<br />

PUBLIC<br />

for your use. Please be thoughtful of others<br />

Lounge<br />

by keeping calls brief.<br />

SPACES are located in front of the<br />

PARKING<br />

for your use if you drive your own car to<br />

building<br />

the Center.<br />

YOU ttAVE TO LEAVE the Center before 4:00 P.M.<br />

IF<br />

check out with your Counselor so that you can<br />

always<br />

be given credit for excused absences.<br />

YOU GET SICK you may<br />

IF<br />

'to our Medical<br />

go<br />

Section. feel bad?<br />

SMALL WEEKLY ALLOWANCE may A be given to you.<br />

includes a free hot lunch daily in our Cafeteria.<br />

'This<br />

$1.00 a day for transportation. If you are the head<br />

and<br />

a household and have dependent children, you may<br />

of<br />

be given $2.00 a day for child care allowance.<br />

also<br />

your Caseworker. for detail s.<br />

Ask<br />

AND RECORD PLAYERS should not be<br />

RADIOS<br />

to the Center.<br />

brought<br />

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LEAVE THE CENTER?<br />

the end of your stay at the Center you and your<br />

Toward<br />

your Counselor will be talking more and more about<br />

what can you do, what do you want to do? You<br />

jobs;<br />

find that you have .the chance to get into a<br />

might<br />

course. Your Counselor will tell you what<br />

training<br />

of training you might be qualified for and will<br />

kind<br />

help you find the best places to get this training.<br />

you need to go to work right away, your Counselor<br />

If<br />

tell you the kinds of jobs that are best for you.<br />

will<br />

person who referred you to us The will be given a<br />

of your Evaluation and will help you in<br />

report<br />

o job in any way possible. Your Center<br />

locating<br />

will tell you who will lead the effort to<br />

Counselor<br />

the proper job for you. IMPORTANT! A<br />

locate<br />

SHARE OF THIS RESPONSIBILITY IS<br />

LARGE<br />

YOURS!<br />

after you have gotten a job, we will still be<br />

Even<br />

in you. It is important that you send us<br />

interested<br />

if you change your address or change yourjob.<br />

word<br />

is also i.mportant that the Center hear from you if<br />

It<br />

you have trouble with job. This will allow us to<br />

your<br />

you solve the problem without losing your job<br />

help<br />

your income!).<br />

(or<br />

YOU AREIMPORTANT. We<br />

REMEMBER---<br />

JUST as interested in YOUR SUCCESS as<br />

are<br />

are YOURSELF!<br />

YOU<br />

7 8<br />

THE COISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />

an employment evaluation and service center be operated<br />

That<br />

the State of Washington by Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

in<br />

146


Facilities and Workshops continued<br />

Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

task forces throughout the state. Task Force II on Work-<br />

utilized<br />

Facilities and Resources functioned as regional advisory<br />

shops<br />

for the State of Washington workshop and facility planning<br />

committees<br />

by Payson H. Jeynes, Rehabilitation Facility Services, Olympia,<br />

headed<br />

The aim of the planning was to provide services for all<br />

Washington.<br />

individuals who need help from workshops, facilities, and<br />

those<br />

so that by 1975 everyone in the state needing these services<br />

resources<br />

will be able to receive them.<br />

Interim State Plan for Workshops and Facilities, pub<br />

The<br />

in 1968 by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, contains<br />

fished<br />

the following information in the words of Mr. Jeynes:<br />

StatewideTotals<br />

1968<br />

compilation of the statewide rehabilitation facilities<br />

A<br />

resources normally used by or available to the rehab-<br />

and<br />

ilitation counselor follows.<br />

State<br />

Number<br />

of Program of Programs Total<br />

Kind<br />

FACILITIES, PRIVATE<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

TAX SUPPORTED i01<br />

AND<br />

cRehabilitation Centers,<br />

i.<br />

entities providing a<br />

Autonomous<br />

range of rehabilitation services.<br />

Rehabilitation Center section of<br />

2.<br />

Hospitals, or University<br />

General<br />

.Special programs of<br />

Unit.<br />

Therapy, Physical<br />

Occupational<br />

and/or Social Work<br />

Therapy,<br />

etc.<br />

Service,<br />

3. Evaluation Centers.<br />

4. Workshops 46<br />

Regional Facilities that provide<br />

5,<br />

or unusual rehabilita-<br />

extensive<br />

services for clients with<br />

tion<br />

disabilities; i.e.,<br />

special<br />

Kidney Center, Speech<br />

Artificial<br />

Hearing Center.<br />

and<br />

147<br />

43


Ki__nd ofProgram<br />

RESOURCES<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

Private<br />

Group living Facilities and<br />

i.<br />

Halfway Houses.<br />

and<br />

Miscellaneous (Crisis Clinic,<br />

2.<br />

Therapy Program.)<br />

Elks'<br />

RESOURCES<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

Supported<br />

Tax<br />

School Programs<br />

i.<br />

programs for mentally<br />

Special<br />

disabled or problem<br />

retarded,<br />

not accommodated in<br />

students<br />

regular classes.<br />

County-City and District Health<br />

2.<br />

Programs<br />

Special clinics<br />

a.<br />

Public health nursing<br />

b.<br />

services<br />

Institutions<br />

3.<br />

In-Patient<br />

For<br />

a.<br />

Delinquent Minors<br />

Mentally retarded<br />

b.<br />

Mental-.emotional adults<br />

c.<br />

and children•<br />

Out-Patient<br />

For<br />

Health•'Faciliti es<br />

Mental<br />

U. S. Government<br />

4.<br />

employees, veterans,<br />

Government<br />

servicemen<br />

(In-Patient)<br />

Hospitals<br />

Dispensary (Out-Patient)<br />

Government Program<br />

Special<br />

training Seattle (Area<br />

Work<br />

Beaut if icat ion)<br />

Statewide•SitUations•and Considerations<br />

39<br />

i0<br />

114<br />

5¸1<br />

40<br />

State<br />

Total<br />

is imperative that the local vocational rehabilitation<br />

It<br />

have. a good relationship with local facilities and<br />

programs<br />

workshops. Facilities, workshops and rehabilitation agencies<br />

148<br />

266


interdependent, They deal with the same problem the<br />

are<br />

of the vocationally handicapped individual.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

good rehabilitation facilities and workshops will<br />

Build±ng<br />

in better vocat±onal rehabilitation programs.<br />

result<br />

Interim Plan for Workshops and Facllltles has as its<br />

This<br />

the orderly development of workshops and facilities<br />

objective<br />

as to provide needed serviQes for all Washington State<br />

so<br />

who need help, and particularly the clients of the<br />

persons<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

inventory indicates that we have 46 sheltered workshops<br />

Our<br />

one in Oregon and 55 rehabilitation facility<br />

including<br />

Their records indicate some type of service<br />

programs.<br />

to over 20,000 persons during the past year, There<br />

given<br />

266 other programs in Washington that are classified<br />

are<br />

rehabilitation resources because they do not meet the<br />

as<br />

definition of a facility or workshop at this time.<br />

present<br />

are, however, possible future facilities or workshops.<br />

They<br />

the persons in need of rehabilitation facilities<br />

Considering<br />

workshops) as a conservative one-half of one<br />

(excluding<br />

of the state population, at the present time the<br />

percent<br />

are serving only. 14 percent of the people who<br />

facilities<br />

the service. This is based on the fact that at the<br />

need<br />

of the survey of facilities there were 2,299 clients<br />

time<br />

receiving services out of a potential client load of 16,300,<br />

the same method with the information obtained in our<br />

Using<br />

of workshops, an estimated one-half of one percent<br />

survey<br />

the population could benefit from workshop programs, we<br />

of<br />

that on the day of the survey the workshops were<br />

find<br />

only 15 percent of the need. This is based on the<br />

meeting<br />

that 2,414 persons out of a potential of 16,300 were<br />

fact<br />

receiving service.<br />

both facilities and workshops we found many programs<br />

With<br />

the available operation was not being utilized fully.<br />

where<br />

is particularly true with the vocational rehabilita-<br />

This<br />

facilities. Many physical therapy departments in<br />

tion<br />

in both large and small communities could handle<br />

hospitals<br />

a few more patients. Many hospitals in relatively<br />

quite<br />

communities like Wenatchee have large physical therapy<br />

small<br />

handling a big load of out-patients. At certain<br />

departments<br />

of the year this service is.badly needed since<br />

times<br />

a fw physical therapists practice in the area.<br />

only<br />

large physical therapy departments although fully<br />

These<br />

during part of the year are not utilized completely<br />

utilized<br />

the rest of the time.<br />

149


Washington has large rehabilitation facilities that<br />

Western<br />

services for clients from the whole state; for ex-<br />

provide<br />

the University of Washington Hospital; the H. T.<br />

ample,<br />

Center of the Labor and Industries Department; the<br />

Buckner<br />

Center for the Blind; and such private operations<br />

Northwest<br />

the Virginia Mason Hospital and Clinc; the Children's<br />

as<br />

Hospital, all in Seattle; C.O,V,E. in Everett;<br />

Orthopedic<br />

Industries Rehabilitation Center in Tacoma; and<br />

Goodwill<br />

the Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center in Puyallup.<br />

artificial Kidney Center in Seattle and the Elks'<br />

The<br />

Therapy Program are other regional programs out of<br />

Mobile<br />

Seattle.<br />

the present time plans are in progress for a new com-<br />

At<br />

multi-disability center in Seattle to be located<br />

prehensive<br />

not far from Sick's Stadium.<br />

all the existing facilities in Seattle, present and<br />

Despite<br />

growth in King County as well as the temporary influx<br />

future<br />

the sick and disabled people that always occurs in a big<br />

of<br />

will continue to build need for rehabilitation facility<br />

city<br />

services.<br />

needs of the culturally deprived and disadvantaged for<br />

The<br />

facility.services especially in King County<br />

rehabilitation<br />

rapidly becoming evident and this need should be met by<br />

is<br />

establishment of new programs.<br />

the<br />

Spokane area shows an.unquestioned need for the ser-<br />

The<br />

of a comprehensive multi-disability center. A com-<br />

vices<br />

rehabilitation center in Spokane with a vocational<br />

plete<br />

program tied in with a hospital physical medi-<br />

evaluation<br />

program would provide services to a wide area and<br />

.cine<br />

clients from Oregon, Idaho, and Montana as well<br />

attract<br />

as<br />

Eastern Washington.<br />

information on sheltered workshops brings out the<br />

Statewide<br />

that most ofthem are small. Only a few provide ser-<br />

fact<br />

for more than 75 people. The largest workshop in the<br />

vice<br />

is Goodwill Industries in Seattle which has a total<br />

state<br />

of 400 people. Most of the workshops have tended<br />

caseload<br />

serve local people in their own area, but some of them<br />

to<br />

been enlarging and opening their doors to more distant<br />

have<br />

This naturally creates a need for supervised<br />

clients.<br />

housing for the people who come from outside the town.<br />

facilities and workshops have continued to grow in<br />

Both<br />

size and quality of service. Although we have no<br />

numbers,<br />

for the growth of facilities we do have some figures<br />

figures<br />

the U. S. Department of Labor which indicates the<br />

from<br />

150


of sheltered workshops in the state. In 1961 there<br />

growth<br />

18 workshops with !032 clients. In 1966 there were<br />

were<br />

workshops and 1,612 clients. We now have 46 workshops<br />

28<br />

2,414 clients on the date of our recent survey includ-<br />

with<br />

ing one workshop in Portland, Oregon.<br />

seems to be true that only a small proportion who could<br />

It<br />

from the services of a sheltered workshop now<br />

benefit<br />

participate in the programs. Many workshops<br />

actually<br />

not only as a place of work but also as a labora-<br />

function<br />

for the development of new methods and techniques for<br />

tory<br />

handicapped persons. The work activity itself is<br />

training<br />

to clients as it keeps them mentally and physi<br />

beneficial<br />

active and contributes to their recovery.<br />

cally<br />

is no reason why workshops cannot be utilized to assist<br />

There<br />

train the disadvantaged or culturally deprived persons.<br />

and<br />

workshops and sheltered work opportunities might<br />

Sheltered<br />

used to provide work experience and skill training for<br />

be<br />

long-term unemployed who do not have the education or<br />

the<br />

experience backgrounds necessary for them to compete<br />

work<br />

on an equal basis for jobs in our society.<br />

all areas of the state there.is a need for better utiliza-<br />

In<br />

of the workshops we have, and in most areas of the state<br />

tion<br />

is a need for more transitional and extended service<br />

there<br />

Some of these needs may be met by satellite<br />

workshops.<br />

operations of larger shops.<br />

service workshops are becoming more and more neces-<br />

Extended<br />

to serve growing numbers of people who will never be<br />

sary<br />

to work in a competitive setting. Since work itself<br />

able<br />

therapeutic, money spent in a government subsidy to a<br />

is<br />

is better than the same money spent to support a<br />

workshop<br />

on the Public Assistance rolls or in a state institu<br />

person<br />

tion.<br />

questionnaire completed by rehabilitation counselors in<br />

A<br />

state regarding relationships between the Division work-<br />

the<br />

and other facilities, revealed a need for improved<br />

shops<br />

among the various programs. Publication of<br />

communication<br />

WORKSHOPS by the State Office is an attempt<br />

WASHINGTON<br />

fill this need.<br />

to<br />

the development of a Workshop Manual, and improved<br />

With<br />

between the counselors and the workshops and<br />

communications<br />

people, many of these problems are being alle-<br />

facilities<br />

(End of statement by Mr. Jeynes)<br />

viated.<br />

151


WASHINGTON WO.PKSHOP a newsletter, was initi.ated in<br />

The<br />

1968 by the Divi.s$on of Octional Rehabilitation to<br />

Jul-August<br />

coordinate news and activit±es of sheltered workshops. Actively<br />

help<br />

the Division in this effort is. the Wshington Association<br />

assisting<br />

Rehabilitation Industries for the Handicapped. Elton Troth of the<br />

of<br />

staff, is the editor.<br />

Division<br />

State workshops are among the finest in the<br />

Washington<br />

States. They have been subsidized in different ways by Voca-<br />

United<br />

Rehabilitation. The workshops and the Division of Vocational<br />

tional<br />

have had a symbiotic effect on each other. An effort<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

be made to carry out the principles enunciated in a policy state-<br />

will<br />

by the National Rehabilitation Association, Board of Directors,<br />

ment<br />

October 2, .1968. A quotation from the statement follows:<br />

growing use of workshops as facilities for the rehabili-<br />

The<br />

and employment of handicapped people and the unique<br />

tation<br />

which must be solved in connection with the<br />

problems<br />

development, and proper use of such facil-<br />

establishment,<br />

resulted in the development by the National Rehabili-<br />

ities<br />

Association of this statement of public policy on<br />

tation<br />

important subject. It is the position of the National<br />

this<br />

Association that:<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

There are numerous severely handicapped individuals<br />

i.<br />

this country who are not able to compete in open<br />

in<br />

employment.<br />

As the result of a controlled work experience many<br />

2.<br />

these individuals will be able to move into open<br />

of<br />

Others cannot attain or maintain production<br />

employment,<br />

expected of workers, and, hence, cannot earn<br />

standards<br />

the wages ordinarily paid.<br />

It is sound public policy that handicapped individuals<br />

3.<br />

given the opportunity to work for pay to the extent<br />

be<br />

of their productive capacity.<br />

Workshops have been established to provide work oppor-<br />

4.<br />

and related services for handicapped individuals.<br />

tunities<br />

functions of the workshop are to provide evaluation<br />

The<br />

work potential, work adjustment, vocational training,<br />

of<br />

employment for limited or a combination of these.<br />

paid<br />

person sould be continued in a workshop program who<br />

No<br />

can be placed in suitable outside employment.<br />

A workshop performing more than one of the functions<br />

5.<br />

above should be able to identify clearly the<br />

listed<br />

portion of its total program devoted to each function.<br />

152


Clients in workshops should be paid on the basis of<br />

6.<br />

Wage rates should be based on local pre-<br />

productivity.<br />

wages for the same or similar work, and all clients<br />

vailing<br />

employees should be covered by social security.<br />

and<br />

principles will apply to handicapped persons<br />

These<br />

services under a program gponsored by a rehab-<br />

receiving<br />

agency. Workshops, whether private or public<br />

ilitation<br />

should adhere to applicable federal and state<br />

auspices,<br />

wage and hour regulations.<br />

It is the responsibility of the sponsors and the commun-<br />

7.<br />

to provide the initial costs of land, buildings,<br />

ity<br />

and the cost of auxiliary services needed in<br />

equipment,<br />

with providing work opportunities for handi<br />

connection<br />

persons. The cost of such facilities, equipment,<br />

capped<br />

services should not be considered as costs of pro-<br />

and<br />

duction to be paid before wages.<br />

Agencies using workshops for evaluation and training<br />

8.<br />

should pay the cost of these services. These<br />

purposes<br />

should also pay living allowances to handi-<br />

agencies<br />

people receiving training or evaluation when this<br />

capped<br />

is necessary to assure satisfactory living conditions.<br />

A workshop cannot be expected to pay wage rates higher<br />

9.<br />

prevailing community rates for the same or similar<br />

than<br />

If subsidies are needed to enable the handicapped<br />

work.<br />

to maintain a decent standard of living, then<br />

individual<br />

subsidies should be clearly identified and not paid<br />

such<br />

a part of wages and may appropriately come from the<br />

as<br />

federal government, the state or the community.<br />

In order to enable handicapped people to increase their<br />

i0.<br />

the workshop should overcome inadequacies and<br />

earnings,<br />

that limit productive capacity and its<br />

inefficiencies<br />

workers.<br />

A workshop should negotiate its contracts and set its<br />

ii.<br />

at a level which will assure fair competition.<br />

prices<br />

a workshop undercuts prices of private industry by<br />

If<br />

workers or by absorbing overhead costs, it<br />

underpaying<br />

guilty of unfair competition as well as unfair labor<br />

is<br />

Such practices may actually result in the<br />

practices.<br />

unfairly subsidizing an industry that gives<br />

community<br />

workshop a contract.<br />

the<br />

A workshop should have a grievance procedure for communi-<br />

12.<br />

with trainees and employees which facilitates<br />

cating<br />

and hearing complaints and discussing the<br />

receiving<br />

of general or specific nature.<br />

problems<br />

153


The Military Rejectee<br />

the early 1960s rehabilitation services for the military<br />

In<br />

were proposed. Almost all eighteen-year-old males in the<br />

rejectee<br />

States register under the Selective Service System. Many of<br />

United<br />

individuals either physically or intellectully are unable to<br />

these<br />

the minimum standards of the Armed Services, A number of these<br />

meet<br />

individuals have vocational potential. Many have correctable<br />

rejected<br />

defects. Those that are illiterate can be provided specialized<br />

physical<br />

to improve their academic skills. Efforts were made in the<br />

training<br />

to provide rehabilitation services to those rejected as unfit by<br />

1960s<br />

draft boards. However, many of those who were offered vocational<br />

the<br />

services refused those services, particularly if they<br />

rehabilitation<br />

the correction of any defect will make them eligible for the<br />

feel<br />

Services. Military service for many is so repugnant that draftees<br />

Armed<br />

the vocational rehabilitation service which would correct the<br />

refused<br />

The referral program was never vigorously pursued in Washing-<br />

defect.<br />

State and is now dormant.<br />

ton<br />

Pub lic Assistance<br />

THE COMMISSION REGOMMENDS:<br />

since the basic role of persons in some helping pro-<br />

That,<br />

is similar, part of the training programs for new<br />

fessions<br />

and in-service training programs for those in<br />

employees<br />

employment should be together. Those trained together<br />

state<br />

be rehabilitation counselors, employment security<br />

would<br />

public assistance caseworkers, probation and<br />

counselors,<br />

officers, public health nurses, and the like. This<br />

parole<br />

of the training could be done under the State Department<br />

part<br />

of Personnel.<br />

following statement about one aspect of his program is<br />

The<br />

by Mr. E. M. Oliver, long-time Director and Executive Officer of<br />

made<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Coordinating Council for<br />

the<br />

Education.<br />

Occupational<br />

its inception in 1933 the Division of Vocational<br />

Since<br />

has worked with disabled public assistance recipients.<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

1955, legislation was enacted which was to make the<br />

In<br />

State program unique in the nation through the initiation<br />

Washington<br />

a pilot program, supported entirely by state funds, for the rehabili-<br />

of<br />

of nondisabled public assistance recipients.<br />

tation<br />

1955 through the biennium which ended June 30, 1967,<br />

From<br />

program, supported by state funds, provided rehabilitation ser-<br />

this<br />

vices to selected public assistance recipients who were vocationally<br />

154


and unable to hold or get jobs because they lacked the<br />

handicapped,<br />

and training required in the labor market. These persons were<br />

skills<br />

to the Division by the local offices of the State Department<br />

referred<br />

Public Assistance. Through the years the combined services provided<br />

of<br />

rehabilitation counselors and social workers, working side by side,<br />

by<br />

so successful that the general philosophy claimed the attention<br />

proved<br />

recognition of the Federal Office of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

and<br />

years later, under the Amendments to the Federal Vocational<br />

Eleven<br />

Act, Federal funds became available to support within<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

the states the type of service pioneered in the State of Washington.<br />

all<br />

assessments of the Division's program for public<br />

Various<br />

recipients have been made. In the early 1950s, the State<br />

assistance<br />

for Vocational Education which had the administrative responsi-<br />

Board<br />

for the vocational rehabilitation program in Washington State<br />

bility<br />

with the University of Washington to do a study with regard<br />

contracted<br />

the effectiveness of the entire vocational rehabilitation program.<br />

to<br />

study, issued in 1954, was completed by Frank Ro Bruel,<br />

The<br />

that time an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Social<br />

at<br />

at the University of Washington. It was entitled, DO THEY STAY<br />

Work,<br />

The author in his conclusions stated in part that the<br />

REHABILITATED?<br />

of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation were remark-<br />

"services<br />

successful" and that "one could not ask for a higher percentage<br />

ably<br />

self-supporting individuals after a period of from 30 to 41 months<br />

of<br />

closure."<br />

following<br />

1960, the State Board for Vocational Education again<br />

In<br />

an outside agency, the Washington State Research Council, to<br />

sought<br />

and report on the degree of economic success or failure of both<br />

study<br />

regular program for the disabled and the growing program for the<br />

the<br />

of public assistance recipients. This report concluded<br />

rehabilitation<br />

"the employment, wage and public assistance record of 125 cases<br />

that<br />

receiving vocational rehabilitation services for the nondisabled<br />

after<br />

beyond any doubt the value of these services."<br />

demonstrates<br />

Washington program was the subject of a Federal study,<br />

The<br />

ANALYSIS OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR NONDISABLED<br />

AN<br />

PERSONS, prepared by the Division of Statistics and<br />

DISADVANTAGED<br />

of the Federal Rehabilitation Services Administration. Case-<br />

Studies<br />

data for the 1967 Fiscal Year were supplied to the Federal agency<br />

load<br />

the Division for this study. Authors of the study state: "...the<br />

by<br />

results, limited though they are, fortify our a pror<br />

Washington<br />

that the well-developed, patient, comprehensive, individ-<br />

assumptions<br />

vocational rehabilitation approach is an obvious way in which<br />

ualized<br />

help the nondisabled but disadvantaged person achieve a better<br />

to<br />

life for himself and his children."<br />

155


1967: its pioneer.ing period over, the program for the<br />

After<br />

ws incorporated into the general service program of the<br />

nondishled<br />

Te graph belo is from the DiVision's 1967 Annual Report.<br />

Division.<br />

show the number of persons rehaBiltated by the Nondisabled<br />

Figures<br />

Program and by the general agency.<br />

HANDICAPPED PERSONS REHABILITATED<br />

13.648<br />

10-YEAR PERIOD<br />

IN<br />

BIENNIUM THROUGH 1965/'67 BIENNIUM<br />

1957/59<br />

521<br />

3<br />

Nondisabled Program<br />

figure.:<br />

Combined<br />

Federal-State<br />

Services<br />

Extended<br />

Nondisabled<br />

2,399<br />

1,898<br />

i12!'.<br />

57/59 59/61<br />

686<br />

2,997<br />

61/153<br />

BIENNIUM<br />

2,833<br />

!.<br />

63/65<br />

759.<br />

65/67<br />

total of all rehabilitated cases for this 10-year period was<br />

The<br />

Of this number,"2,619 were served in the Nondisabled<br />

13,648.<br />

11,029 were rehabilitated as clients of Federal-State<br />

Program;<br />

Extended Services programs.<br />

an4.<br />

13,648 rehabilit'ants had 23,297 dependents, raising to a<br />

The<br />

total of 36,945 the number of persons who benefited<br />

grand<br />

whose lives were involved in. the rehabilitation process in<br />

and<br />

time.<br />

this<br />

public assistance recipients from both the<br />

Rehabilitated<br />

and general agency program have formed a creditable<br />

Nondisabled<br />

of the number rehabilitated Dy the Division as the following<br />

portion<br />

shows.<br />

table<br />

156


ASSISTANCE RECIPIENTS REHABILITATED<br />

PUBLIC<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation: 1964 1968<br />

Division<br />

TOTAL REHABILITATED<br />

of rehabilitated<br />

Number<br />

referred by public<br />

cases<br />

welfare agencies<br />

% of total rehabilitated<br />

1964 1965 1966 1967 1968<br />

1355 1478 1564 1957 1855<br />

475 420 502 625 423<br />

34.0% 28.5% 32.1% 31.9% 22.8%<br />

leadership in rehabilitating the largest per-<br />

Washingtons<br />

of public assistance cases of any state in the Union did not<br />

centage<br />

about by accident. Please See table on following page. The<br />

come<br />

which initiated the program resulted from the cooperative<br />

legislation<br />

of the director of Employment Security, the director of Public<br />

efforts<br />

and the director of Vocational Rehabilitation. Joint<br />

Assistance,<br />

of these three departments secured passage of the law which<br />

efforts<br />

three have actively supported throughout the years.<br />

all<br />

Division, again in cooperation with EmploymentSecurity<br />

The<br />

Public Assistance departments, has budgeted for the 1969-71<br />

and<br />

substantial new funds which are expected to double the<br />

biennium<br />

efforts in the rehabilitation of public assistance recip<br />

Division's<br />

ients.<br />

in 1968, joint planning and cooperative efforts by<br />

Further,<br />

Department of Public Assistance, the Division of Vocational<br />

the<br />

and the RegionalOffice of the Federal Rehabilitation<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Administration led to the securing of a Federal grant for a<br />

Services<br />

evaluate and inventory the rehabilitation potential of<br />

project"to<br />

selected sample of Public Assistance recipients."<br />

a<br />

a project director, a manual of procedures was. drafted,<br />

Under<br />

by March 1969, the project was ready to launch. Following study<br />

and<br />

and the hiring of necessary personnel the agencies involved<br />

sessions<br />

to initiate by July 1969 a program designed to evaluate the<br />

expect<br />

potential of public assistance recipients and to move<br />

rehabilitation<br />

toward preparing these individuals for self-support.<br />

constructively<br />

project is discussed in greater detail under 2bl WIfare,<br />

The<br />

182-184,<br />

page<br />

157


RANKING OF STATES IN ORDER OF THE PERCENT<br />

A<br />

REHABILITATED CASES RECEIVING PUBLIC ASSISTANCE<br />

OF<br />

WHEN ACCEPTED FOR REHABILITATION SERVICES 1966 and 19671<br />

TOP TEN STATES 1966<br />

S TA TE<br />

Number<br />

Rehabilitated<br />

of P.A.<br />

Number<br />

Acceptance<br />

at<br />

of Total Rehabilitated<br />

Percent<br />

PA at Acceptance<br />

Receiving<br />

1,330 312 23.5%<br />

Washington<br />

liforn ia 4,522 1,059 23.4<br />

Ca<br />

822 190 23.1<br />

Utah<br />

4,365 890 20.4<br />

Kentucky<br />

668 135 20.2<br />

Delaware<br />

255 50 19.6<br />

Vermont<br />

M ex ico 476 88 18.5<br />

New<br />

12,338 2,135 17.3<br />

Pennsylvania<br />

Virginia 4,029 699 17 ;3<br />

West<br />

82 14 17.1<br />

Alaska<br />

U. S. TOTALS 154,279 20,106 13.1<br />

TOP TEN STATES 1967<br />

1,689<br />

Washington<br />

968<br />

Utah<br />

6,375<br />

California<br />

4,810<br />

Kentucky<br />

Virginia 4,319<br />

West<br />

127<br />

Alaska<br />

4,439<br />

Missouri<br />

1,1.13<br />

Oregon<br />

3,300<br />

Oklahoma<br />

13,112<br />

Pennsylvania<br />

U. S. TOTALS 173,594<br />

25.9<br />

438<br />

22.0<br />

190<br />

18.5<br />

1,179<br />

17.7<br />

849<br />

16.8<br />

725<br />

16:5<br />

21<br />

16.4<br />

729<br />

16.2<br />

180<br />

15.7<br />

517<br />

15.4<br />

2,015<br />

21,451 12.4<br />

Figures compiled by Division of Statistics and Studies, Rehabilitation Services Administration,<br />

FROM:<br />

distributed at Policy Committee Meeting, Council of State Administrators for Vocational<br />

and<br />

Rehabilitation, February 6-8, 1968, Washington, D.C.<br />

this study the Federal agency combined the closed, case figures from the State-Federal program<br />

1/For<br />

from the state agency serving the blind. In Washington State these are separate programs, but in<br />

and<br />

states a single agency administers both. The 1966 figure for Washington includes 1,209<br />

many<br />

in the State-Federal program, plus 121 rehabilitated by the Services for the Blind. For<br />

rehabilitated<br />

1967, the figures are 1,551 for the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and 138 for the blind agency.<br />

158


a recent meeting of directors and staff of the State<br />

At<br />

of Public Assistance and the Division of Vocational<br />

Department<br />

the two agencies agreed that an important and vital<br />

Rehabilitation,<br />

facing them today is to assist public welfare applicants and<br />

task<br />

to become self-supporting. Both departments recognize<br />

recipients<br />

the challenge to rehabilitate impoverished and dependent citi-<br />

that<br />

zens has never been greater.<br />

Division has set a goal to move from some I000 public<br />

The<br />

recipients rehabilitated per biennium to approximately<br />

assistance<br />

Joining in this common effort with the Division will be the<br />

2000.<br />

Security Department and the State Department of Public<br />

Employment<br />

Assistance. (End of statement byMr. Oliver)<br />

of the State Department of Public Assistance<br />

Services<br />

considered in a book published by the Planning Commission,<br />

are<br />

IN WASHINGTON STATE: PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY STATE<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

These improvements in the services were recommended<br />

AGENCIES.<br />

the chapters written by one of the co-authors, John B. Welsh, Jr.,<br />

in<br />

is shown in the photograph with the Research Analyst, Mrs. Jean<br />

who<br />

who gathered the laws and interagency agreements having the<br />

Mead,<br />

of laws which were recorded in the book.<br />

effect<br />

159


Migrants<br />

State of Washington makes extensive use of migrant farm<br />

The<br />

to handle the apples, peaches, apricots and berries. Many of<br />

labor<br />

migrants are severely deprived people. A series of articles<br />

these<br />

Darrell Houston, a reporter for the SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER, was<br />

by<br />

in September, 1968 under the title, "Slums in the Orchards."<br />

published<br />

reports indicate that the plight,of the migrant farm laborer has<br />

These<br />

improved significantly in recent years. The abominable conditions<br />

not<br />

which these people live and work have been described at length.<br />

under<br />

Agee wrote about the rural poor in a penetrating work,<br />

James<br />

US NOW PRAISE FAMOUS MEN. In his introduction he outlined the<br />

LET<br />

as follows: "...to pry intimately into the lives of an undefended<br />

task<br />

appallingly damaged group of human beings, an ignorant and helpless<br />

and<br />

family, for the purpose of parading the nakedness, disadvantage<br />

rural<br />

humilitation of these lives before another group of human beings,<br />

and<br />

in the name of science, of 'honest journalism.'"<br />

GRAPES OF WRATH, written about the migrant workers of<br />

THE<br />

1930's, earned John Steinbeck a Nobel Prize for literature.<br />

the<br />

legislation,however, to help. these people has not been written.<br />

Social<br />

are fewer in number now each year, butthe conditions under which<br />

There<br />

they live and work are as bad as ever.<br />

Rehabilitation Amendments of 1965 provided grants<br />

Vocational<br />

a 90/10 ratio to stateswhich would serve these damaged people.<br />

on<br />

money, however,, for the program was not appropriated by Congress.<br />

The<br />

was another case where services were promised but not provided.<br />

This<br />

people in their dumb resignation continue to be abused continue<br />

These<br />

provide little to society as a whole.<br />

to<br />

Social Security and Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

comments which follow were prepared for this report by.<br />

The<br />

P. Holden, Supervisorin charge of Social Security and Disa-<br />

Donald<br />

bility Services.<br />

Social Security Act as amended in 1965, provides for<br />

The<br />

payments to disabled workers and to disabled children who.<br />

benefit<br />

have attained age eighteen.<br />

1966-67 Amendments to the Social Security Act extended<br />

The<br />

benefits to disabled widows, widowers, and surviving<br />

disability<br />

wives, based upon the Social Security wage records of a<br />

divorced<br />

spouse. The cost of rehabilitation services provided to<br />

deceased<br />

workers, disabled widows, widowers, and surviving divorced<br />

disabled<br />

chargeable to the Federal Disability Trust Fund or to the<br />

wives<br />

Federal OASI Trust Fund.<br />

160


intent of Congress in making Trust Fund monies avail-<br />

The<br />

to pay rehabilitation costs is to make it possible for more<br />

able<br />

to be rehabilitated into gainful employment. In so<br />

beneficiaries<br />

Congress intended that the monies be used in such a way that<br />

doing,<br />

savings in benefits that would otherwise be paid, plus the ad-<br />

the<br />

contributions to the Trust Fund paid on-earnings of bene-<br />

ditional<br />

who returned to jobs will exceed, or at least equal the<br />

ficiaries<br />

paid from the Trust Funds for rehabilitation costs. All ad-<br />

money<br />

and case costs for this program are supported one hun-<br />

ministrative<br />

percent by Federal Social Security Trust Funds.<br />

dred<br />

program in this state started in July 1966, and at<br />

The<br />

end of the first six months had 495 cases in the program. By<br />

the<br />

end of the fiscal year 1967, the caseload had increased to 705.<br />

the<br />

year later in June 1968, it had 825 cases. During the first fiscal<br />

A<br />

42 cases were closed.rehabilitated,and in the 1967-68 fiscal<br />

year<br />

the total rehabilitations were 105, an increase of one hundred<br />

year<br />

fifty percent.<br />

of the functions of the Trust Fund program is to screen<br />

One<br />

Social Security Disability claimant applicants for vocational<br />

all<br />

services. The number of cases reviewed is shown on<br />

rehabilitation<br />

table below:<br />

the<br />

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIMS: 1964-1968<br />

1964/65 1965/66 1967/68 TOTAL<br />

Cases Reviewed 4,250 6,123 10,824 21,197<br />

Screened Out 3.,848 4,819 8,304 16,971<br />

Accepted 402 1,304 2,520 4,226<br />

Rehabilitated 42 105 147<br />

has been a substantial increase in both the number of<br />

There<br />

being served under this program during the last three years, as<br />

cases<br />

well as the number of cases that are being rehabilitated.<br />

program is administered by a state supervisor (Social<br />

The<br />

Administration Disability Service), four vocational rehabili-<br />

Security<br />

officers working full-time on Trust Fund caseloads;.two in<br />

tation<br />

one in Tacoma and one in Spokane. In the smaller towns and<br />

Seattle,<br />

161


areas, these severely handicapped people were served by the<br />

rural<br />

vocational rehabilitation officer.<br />

regular<br />

all the vocational rehabilitation potential is realized<br />

If<br />

these Social Security Disability pension clients, it will be<br />

from<br />

that the staff helping these people be-doubled and the case<br />

necessary<br />

money be more than doubled. It is better to have experienced<br />

service<br />

assiRned to helping these difficult cases, the way it is<br />

counselors<br />

(End of statement by Mr. Holden)<br />

now.<br />

Disab led Youth<br />

THE CO4ISSION RECOENDS:<br />

state-supported nursery schools and home therapy services<br />

That<br />

established for the deaf, hard-of-hearing and language-<br />

be<br />

de layed child.<br />

every student who is in need of vocational rehab-<br />

That...<br />

services should be served.<br />

ilitation<br />

of the most significant programs in Vocational Rehab-<br />

One<br />

involves handicapped youth. This program provides the<br />

ilitation<br />

combination of habilitation and rehabilitation. It combines<br />

best<br />

and therapy. Those states which have provided signifi-<br />

prevention<br />

for disabled youth in special education classes have had<br />

cantly<br />

results. The greatest majority of the youngsters who have<br />

amazing<br />

through thiscooperative school program--more than 90 percent<br />

gone<br />

them--are employed afterwards. .Young people who go through a<br />

of<br />

education program which does not have vocational rehabili-<br />

special<br />

ties are apt to have one chance in two of being employed.<br />

tation<br />

cooperative school rehabilitation program in the State<br />

The<br />

Washington has not served enough people so far. In the last full<br />

of<br />

year--1968, there were only 58 clients closed rehabilitated.<br />

fiscal<br />

secondary level special education students have a disability and<br />

All<br />

likely to be feasible for rehabilitation services; all should<br />

are<br />

served. A further discussion of the school program appears under<br />

be<br />

Mental Retardation, page 196.<br />

COOPERATIVE SCHOOL/REHABILITATION PROGRAMS<br />

Donald Hamilton<br />

by<br />

Supervisor of Educational Services<br />

State<br />

decades public schools have faced the problem of drop-<br />

For<br />

These are slow learners with mental retardation, emotional<br />

outs.<br />

and other forms of disability which require a new educa-<br />

disturbances<br />

approach. Today the modern school system has responded to<br />

tional<br />

these needs by the gradual development, first, of elementary school<br />

162


adjusted to the needs of handicapped students and, more<br />

programs<br />

similar provisions for junior and senior high school stu-<br />

recently,<br />

as well. Curriculum modifications, special teaching methods,<br />

dents<br />

equipment, special health services, and special counseling<br />

adaptive<br />

have been developed with this group in mind. However, the stu-<br />

all<br />

still faces formidable barriers in moving from school to a<br />

dent<br />

adjustment in the community, including a suitable job.<br />

satisfactory<br />

his problems has lead to natural union of public school ser-<br />

Solving<br />

vices and vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

State of Washington, in building toward such a program<br />

The<br />

a caseload study in 1962 with 50 dropouts from the Tacoma Public<br />

did<br />

The results were so successful that a team from the Tacoma<br />

Schools.<br />

District and Vocational Rehabilitation was assigned to design<br />

School<br />

program. During 1963 visits were made to various places all over<br />

a<br />

United States and those ideas that impressed the team were en-<br />

the<br />

in the final draft. From the results of this study our<br />

compassed<br />

program started in the Tacoma Schools in 1964.<br />

first<br />

cooperative school/rehabilitation programs provide a<br />

The<br />

for the two agencies to organize, improve, and expand, their<br />

way<br />

and to focus them in the most meaningful way upon handi-<br />

services<br />

youth. These services encompass the broad spectrum of living<br />

capped<br />

and cultural development, personal adjustment, func-<br />

--intellectual<br />

training, personal social counseling, job training, and job<br />

tional<br />

They may include family casework services, special health<br />

placement.<br />

rehabilitative medical treatment, special recreation pro-<br />

programs,<br />

and the like. Essentially, the cooperative program commits<br />

grams,<br />

school to improve its services to the utmost with the realiza-<br />

the<br />

that these services will be fully articulated with vocational<br />

tion<br />

services, providing a continuum of assistance to the<br />

rehabilitation<br />

student while he is attending school, during the post-<br />

handicapped<br />

period, and to successful job adjustment.<br />

school<br />

rehabilitation has brought to the school setting<br />

Vocational<br />

especially adapted to handicapped students. The rehabili-<br />

services<br />

program continues to provide services after separation from<br />

tation<br />

as needed, to complete social and vocational rehabilitation.<br />

school,<br />

these services are joined effectively, the student is scarcely<br />

When<br />

of the point at which education ends and rehabilitation begins.<br />

aware<br />

end result is not only beneficial to the handicapped student but<br />

The<br />

of tremendous value to the community as well, striking directly<br />

is<br />

such serious problems as unemployment, dependency, delinquency,<br />

at<br />

human waste.<br />

and<br />

cooperative school programs are no longer experimental., they<br />

These<br />

mainline rehabilitation service here in the State of Washington<br />

are<br />

in most other states. At the present time. there are 14 school<br />

and<br />

with cooperative programs, three new ones planned for the<br />

districts<br />

of 1969, three for the fall of 1970 and 29 school districts on<br />

fall<br />

waiting list.<br />

the<br />

163


survey of eligibility indicates that approximately 50<br />

A<br />

are mentally retarded, 25.percent are behavioral problems,<br />

percent<br />

percent are emotional illness, and 13 percent various physical<br />

12<br />

handicaps.<br />

are 1,196 youngsters getting service from 15 voca"<br />

There<br />

rehabilitation officers and 63 prevocational mdvisors. The<br />

tional<br />

budget for the next biennium is 3-1/2 million dollars.<br />

contemplated<br />

of statement by Mr. Hamilton)<br />

(End<br />

Workmen's Compensation<br />

Planning Commission has taken note of task force re-<br />

The<br />

indicating dissatisfaction with the coordination of programs<br />

ports<br />

the Department of Labor and Industries and Vocational Rehab-<br />

between<br />

A number of injured workmen who are eligible for Voca-<br />

ilitation.<br />

Rehabilitation services have not been referred for those<br />

tional<br />

Most of them are not aware of their entitlement to Voca-<br />

services.<br />

Rehabilitation services. Those that are able to muddle<br />

tional<br />

even at substantial costs to themselves and their, families<br />

through<br />

so. Others following an industrial injury who would rebound with<br />

do<br />

rehabilitation services, do not get these services.and are<br />

proper<br />

handicapped. These are the ones who apply for aid to<br />

permanently<br />

totally and permanently disabled under Public Assistance, or<br />

the<br />

Security Disability grants, or in other ways become burdens<br />

Social<br />

society rather than self-supporting members of it.<br />

to<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

an illustrated brochure be prepared tailored toward<br />

That<br />

employer, physician, attorney, and insurance carrier<br />

the<br />

the services of vocational rehabilitation as<br />

describing<br />

relate to workmen s compensation.<br />

.they<br />

a reporting procedure be devised useful in the screen-<br />

That<br />

and evaluation of industrially .injured cases that could<br />

ing<br />

benefit by vocational rehabilitation services<br />

a result of thisrecommendation a committee composed<br />

As<br />

staff members from Vocational Rehabilitation and the Department<br />

of<br />

Labor and Industry has begun to meet to effect the recommended<br />

of<br />

changes.<br />

recommendation under consideration by the Planning<br />

Another<br />

is quoted as follows:<br />

Commission<br />

the Buckner Rehabilitation Center operated by the<br />

Transform<br />

of Labor and Industries in Seattle into a com-<br />

Department<br />

rehabilitation center to service injured workmen<br />

prehensive<br />

others.<br />

and<br />

Problems may delay the implementation of this recommendation.<br />

164


a meeting of the Planning Commission in December 1968,<br />

At<br />

Harold Petrie, Director of the Department of Labor and Industries,<br />

Mr.<br />

to the statement written by John B. Welsh, Jr., in Chapter<br />

objected<br />

p. 72, of REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE, PROGRAMS PROVIDED<br />

9,<br />

BY STATE AGENCIES:<br />

question then becomes whether the Department of Labor<br />

The<br />

Industries of the Division of Vocational Rehabili-<br />

and<br />

can provide the better service to the injured<br />

tation<br />

It is to be noted, however, that if such re-<br />

workman.<br />

and job placement services could be provided by<br />

ferral<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation the funds<br />

the<br />

for them would be tripled because of the<br />

available<br />

matching grant formula.<br />

federal<br />

Interagency Coordination of Service Prosrams<br />

agreements for cooperative action between<br />

Interagency<br />

Rehabilitation and several other state, agencies have<br />

Vocational<br />

since 1945. Copies of the agreements were not generally<br />

existed<br />

except from the agency files. One of the first major<br />

available<br />

of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

efforts<br />

to assemble descriptions of each of the major agencies pro-<br />

was<br />

rehabilitation services to handicapped, and disadvantaged<br />

viding<br />

Where cooperative agreements were in effect these were<br />

people.<br />

as part of the record of coordination. These and other<br />

secured<br />

were made available through the cooperation of the Di-<br />

documents<br />

vision of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

contract with the Washington State Legislative Council,<br />

A<br />

nonpartisan agency created to serve the State Legislature, assured<br />

a<br />

legal counsel for this study.<br />

material was published in June 1968, in a book by<br />

This<br />

C. Carson, E. M. Oliver, and John B. Welsh, Jr., entitled,<br />

David<br />

IN WASHINGTON STATE, PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY STATE<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

Copies were provided governmental agencies, members of<br />

AGENCIES.<br />

Legislature, accredited high schools, professional staff members<br />

the<br />

the several agencies involved, Federal officials, and the like.<br />

of<br />

in REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE is a de-<br />

Included<br />

of the Vocational Rehabilitation program, the Federal<br />

scription<br />

as amended through 1967, the State law concerning Vocational<br />

law<br />

the most current interagency agreements between<br />

Rehabilitation,<br />

Rehabilitation and other governmental agencies and,<br />

Vocational<br />

a description of six agencies providing vocational rehabili-<br />

lastly,<br />

tation services to handicapped individuals. These six agencies are:<br />

165


of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Division<br />

of Health<br />

Department<br />

of Institutions<br />

Department<br />

of Labor and Industries<br />

Department<br />

of Public Assistamce<br />

Department<br />

Security Department<br />

Employment<br />

Washington State the agency providing vocational rehabilitation<br />

In<br />

to the blind is part of the Department of Public Assistance.<br />

services<br />

cannot simply be achieved,<br />

Coordination<br />

principle, at the federal level. The efforts<br />

in<br />

really count, those that will pay the divi-<br />

that<br />

begin where the service is, where the<br />

dends,<br />

for it exists, and where a willingness to<br />

need<br />

to improve services is essential-- the<br />

organize<br />

Therefore would like to stress the<br />

community.<br />

of community-oriented efforts to bring<br />

importance<br />

service more efficiently and more practic-<br />

better<br />

to people. I believe that such efforts can<br />

ally<br />

place under almost any setting or any spon-<br />

take<br />

that one chooses.<br />

sorship<br />

E. Switzer, Administrator<br />

Mary<br />

and Rehabilitation Service, in an<br />

Social<br />

to the National Rehabilitation<br />

address<br />

New Orleans, La., October 1968<br />

Association,<br />

December 1968, a two-day meeting of the Planning Com-<br />

In<br />

was held in order to hear state directors discuss programs<br />

mission<br />

Health, Institutions, Labor & Industries, Public Assistance, and<br />

in<br />

Security. The description of these state programs aug-<br />

Employment<br />

the written description published earlier in the year in<br />

mented<br />

IN WASHINGTON STATE.<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

chairman's opening remarks at the meeting were appro-<br />

The<br />

as he reflected the feeling of Commission members in his<br />

priate<br />

that the work of the Commission had reached a point where<br />

statement<br />

was a need to talk directly to state agencies regarding voca-<br />

there<br />

rehabilitation goals for the future. This first-hand know-<br />

tional<br />

he said, will be used by the Commission in writing its final<br />

ledge,<br />

which will contain recommendations for. providing vocational<br />

report<br />

services to all handicapped citizens in Washington<br />

rehabilitation<br />

State by 1975.<br />

166


first speaker on the morning program was MR. WILLIAM POPE, Assistant<br />

The<br />

Division of Social Services, Department of Public Assistance. His<br />

Director,<br />

remarks and the discussion they prompted are summarized.<br />

POPE began by commenting that perhaps he could serve the Commission best<br />

MR.<br />

making himself available for questiens and that he would be glad to do this.<br />

by<br />

State Department of Public Assistance, he continued, has two basic responsi-<br />

The<br />

under both State and Federal law. The first of these, and the one for<br />

bilities<br />

the department is best known, is to provide direct'financial assistance to<br />

which<br />

in need. This aid may be in the form of direct payments to the individual;<br />

those<br />

it may be provided through the purchase by.the department of such services<br />

or,<br />

medical and nursing home care, child care, .etc..<br />

as<br />

second major responsibility is to provide services that help the individ-<br />

The<br />

These are broad and varied. MR. POPE listed protective services, primarily<br />

ual.<br />

children; referral services. such as job placement, job training job finding,<br />

for<br />

well as referral to other state and community agencies or resources; direct<br />

as<br />

or counseling services provided to children, in their own homes, to-<br />

casework<br />

parents, to families; indirect services which help an individual to estab-<br />

unmarried<br />

his right to her services such as benefits from the Veterans Administration,<br />

lish<br />

payments from a father, and others.<br />

support<br />

of the department services are habilitative as well as rehabilitative<br />

Many<br />

nature. They try to help the.individual to examine his own resources, to help<br />

in<br />

himself, and to move from dependency to self-sufficiency.<br />

of the services are given because they have been requested by the individ-<br />

Some<br />

who is in financial need and thus eligible for them. The service is given as<br />

ual<br />

as it is required or until the person ceases to be eligible for it. Other<br />

long<br />

such as protective services, adoptive services, referral services, are<br />

services,<br />

regardless of the financial need of the individual. These are available<br />

extended<br />

the high and low earner alike.<br />

to<br />

department policy in helping people, MR. POPE said, is to consider and<br />

The<br />

use of all appropriate resources.. To .this end individual resources are<br />

make<br />

The law is quite specific about financial resources. Depending upon<br />

examined.<br />

nature of the individual need, the program then asks whether another community<br />

the<br />

state agency might better provide the help needed. If vocational rehabilita-<br />

or<br />

help is needed, the individual is referred to the Division of Vocational<br />

tion<br />

If a community agency is equipped to serve this person with<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

services, the referral is made there. The services available through<br />

necessary<br />

Red Cross, the veterans' organizations, UGN, and other volunteer programs are<br />

the<br />

Public Assistance does not try to do the job alone, Mr. Pope added.<br />

explored.<br />

must be aware of and use whatever resources exist within the community.<br />

Caseworkers<br />

of services by other departments is avoided, to the maximum extent<br />

Duplication<br />

possible.<br />

POPE provided the following figures on the number of persons who were<br />

MR.<br />

assistance during the month of September, 1968:<br />

given<br />

Age Assistance (OAA) 24,500 persons<br />

Old<br />

to Families with<br />

Aid<br />

Depehdent Children (AFDC) 66,000 of which 47,000 were children<br />

167


to Blind (AB) 543<br />

Aid<br />

Assistance (DI) ii,000<br />

Disability<br />

Assistance (GA) 13,000<br />

General<br />

certified to Medical Care 138,335<br />

Total<br />

children helped through<br />

Total<br />

Welfare Services 13,795"<br />

Child<br />

in this figure" 5,000 children living with their own parents;<br />

*Included<br />

children in foster care; and 700 children in'children's institutions.<br />

6,000<br />

POPE described the Services for the Blind, a major vocational rehabili-<br />

MR.<br />

program for which the Department of Public Assistance is given specific<br />

tation<br />

under Washington State Law (RCW 74.16.181), as permitted by the<br />

responsibility<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation Act. The program operates under a state plan<br />

Federal<br />

is first reviewed at the state level and then submitted to the U. S. Depart-<br />

that<br />

of Health, Education, and Welfare for approval. Funding is presently 75<br />

ment<br />

Federal money, 25 percent State. Three principal components of this<br />

percent<br />

are: vocational rehabilitation, prevention of blindness, and home teach-<br />

program<br />

ing.<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation Services of the Services..for the Blind<br />

Services for the Blind is operated under the same Federal Regulations<br />

The<br />

govern the program of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Eligibility<br />

that<br />

criteria in the State law provide that a person is eligible who has:<br />

No vision or whose vision with glasses is so defective as<br />

a.<br />

prevent the performance of certain activities for which<br />

to<br />

is essential, or has an eye condition of a pro-<br />

eyesight<br />

nature which may lead to blindness;<br />

gressive<br />

The existence of a substantial handicap to employment<br />

b.<br />

by the limitation resulting from such disability;<br />

caused<br />

A reasonable expectation that vocational rehabilitation<br />

c.<br />

may render the individual fit to engage in a<br />

ervices<br />

remunerative occupation.<br />

list o services which may be provided is basically the same as those<br />

The<br />

from the Division. They include; diagnostic services, training and<br />

available<br />

materials, physical restoration services, transportation, maintenance,<br />

training<br />

tools, equipment, initial stocks and supplies and occupational license,<br />

placement,<br />

and interpreter services, other goods and services necessary to determine<br />

reader<br />

individual's rehabilitation potential or to render him fit to participate in<br />

the<br />

a gainful occupation.<br />

the Randolph Shepherd Act, a vending stand program is operated. Last<br />

Under<br />

36 stands were operated, earning an average income of $6,862 for blind<br />

year,<br />

operators.<br />

comprehensive rehabilitation training center for the blind is operated by<br />

A<br />

program in Seattle. Evaluation and adjustment services are provided here to<br />

the<br />

residents. Residents from other states in this region are accepted<br />

Washington<br />

a fee-for-service based upon the actual cost of providing rehabilitation services.<br />

on<br />

the fiscl year ending June 30, 1968, 158 persons were served in the center,<br />

For<br />

31 from neighboring states.<br />

including<br />

168


program operates with a staff of 45 full-time and three part-time<br />

The<br />

employees.<br />

Prevention of Blindness<br />

for the prevention of blindness have been authorized in the State<br />

Services<br />

1937 in a program that is focused on the provision ofmedical care for eye<br />

since<br />

in which sight is endangered or sight can be mproved. Eligibility<br />

conditions<br />

determined on the basis of need by SDPA county offices. Approximately one-<br />

is<br />

of the cost is provided by Federal funds and two-thirds by State money.<br />

third<br />

conittee of eight practicing ophthalmologists acts in an advisory capacity to<br />

A<br />

the Services for the Blind unit.<br />

Teacher-Counselor<br />

State Law (RCV 74,16,181) authorizes the Department to provide<br />

Washington<br />

service and the teaching of subjects which will assist visually<br />

teacher-counselor<br />

persons in the "ease and enjoyment of daily living." The program has<br />

handicapped<br />

its primary aim the development of self-reliance in the blind person to help<br />

as<br />

adjust to daily living requirements. Counseling is provided, and the only<br />

him<br />

requirement is a visual deficiency requiring the service. There are<br />

eligibility<br />

financial requirements and no fees are charged. The program is funded with<br />

no<br />

percent Federal money and 60 percent.in State funds.<br />

40<br />

is to be noted that Mr. Carson, in his statement of November 14, 1968, on<br />

It<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation services in State Government, recommended<br />

organization<br />

the Services to the Blind unit be moved to the Division of Vocational Rehabili-<br />

that<br />

Mr. Carson's statement is in Section 7 of the Agenda items.<br />

tation.<br />

Department of Public Assistance, MR POPE said in concluding his account<br />

The<br />

services, is the state agency designated by law to process disability claims<br />

of<br />

the Social Security Administration program. This is a unit of the Depart-<br />

under<br />

with 37 employees which is presently adjudicating an average o£ 250 cases<br />

ment<br />

per week.<br />

Disability Determination Unit of Social Security was also recommended<br />

This<br />

Mr. Carson to be in the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

by<br />

DISCUSSION:<br />

GRIDLEY asked whether severely retarded persons could qualify for foster<br />

MRS.<br />

under the present law. MR. POPE replied that foster home care, theoretically,<br />

care<br />

available, especially if the applicant for care is a child. Placement for the<br />

is<br />

adult, however, is more difficult. The foster home care program for<br />

retarded<br />

is just beginning. No satisfactory solution to the entire problem of<br />

adults<br />

living quarters for these people while they are in training has yet<br />

providing<br />

developed. The Services for the Blind has a similar problem finding places<br />

been<br />

their trainees.<br />

for<br />

RIDDER asked how peoplelearned about the services of the Department,<br />

SENATOR<br />

they camefor service. People generally seek aid from the Department, MR. POPE<br />

how<br />

because they know it is one of the agencies in the community which can give<br />

said,<br />

or can direct the applicant to another agency where service is available.<br />

service<br />

169


Department does little outreach except in the case of protective services<br />

The<br />

to a small degree, for Services for the Blind. Some schools of thought<br />

and,<br />

outreach as part of the program. The Federal agency, for example,<br />

recommend<br />

like to see this effort made. Many referrals from other agencies are made<br />

would<br />

directly to the Department.<br />

ADAMS commented that in some states financial eligibility for public<br />

DR.<br />

is being determined on a statement from the applicant. No investiga-<br />

assistance<br />

is made, it is said. The Federal Government is asking states to move in<br />

tion<br />

direction, MR. POPE said, using the relief applicant's statement of need<br />

this<br />

the primary source of information in the determination of his eligibility.<br />

as<br />

i0 percent of the accepted cases would have their statements checked under<br />

Only<br />

spot check system similar to that used by the Internal Revenue Service.<br />

a<br />

statements would result in a mandatory referral to the Prosecuting<br />

Fraudulent<br />

for court action. Frauldulant statements made in relation to the receipt<br />

Attorney<br />

public assistance are considered "gross misdemeanors."<br />

of<br />

FREEN requested information on the residence eligibility requirements<br />

MR.<br />

public assistance payments. Mr. POPE volunteered his personal opinion that<br />

for<br />

an eligibility requirement at the state level was not right, that an individ-<br />

such<br />

should have the freedom to move across state lines without losing his right<br />

ual<br />

to assistance.<br />

EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT<br />

bXINE DALY, Commissioner, Employment Security Department, was the<br />

MRS.<br />

speaker on the morning program. She expressed.her pleasure in appearing<br />

second<br />

the Commission and spoke of the excellent working relationship existing<br />

before<br />

the Department and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. For infor-<br />

between<br />

regarding the Department's program and objectives she referred Commission<br />

mation<br />

to the report, Rehabilitation in Washington State, which she said described<br />

members<br />

well the work of her department. Since th-¢ report was prepared, however, some<br />

very<br />

programs have been developed. One of these, mandated to the Department by<br />

new<br />

law, is the Work Incentive Program (WIN). Another is the Concentrated<br />

Federal<br />

.Program being carried on in the Seattle Central Area. She asked<br />

Employment<br />

MR. PAUL PEMBERTON to describe the WIN Program.<br />

WIN Program, MR. PEMBERTON said, we cannot claim a cuccess. We must<br />

The<br />

with him for 60 days of intensive follow-up if necessary to assure that he<br />

stay<br />

retain his job. Proposals have been made to expand these services to other<br />

will<br />

on the Public Assistance rolls who could benefit from the program.<br />

individuals<br />

Between 2000 and 2500 people have been referred to the program since September.<br />

DALY called WIN one of the most exciting programs within the Employment<br />

MRS.<br />

Department. It has been done on a highly cooperative basis, involving<br />

Security<br />

assistance, vocational rehabilitation, and has demonstrated how well<br />

public<br />

of government can work together. She then asked Mr. James W. Harris<br />

agencies<br />

to comment on program developments in the area of human resources.<br />

HARRIS noted that the service program started with the individual,<br />

.<br />

to answer the question, why is he unemployed? Sometimes there are no<br />

seeking<br />

in the community and the solution may lie in moving to where jobs are<br />

jobs<br />

He may need training, or he may have a handicap which keeps him<br />

available.<br />

from employment. Perhaps he cannot be employed because he is black, or becoming<br />

170


The program begins with an assessment of the individual and seeks to find<br />

old.<br />

his community the resources necessary to overcome barriers to employment.<br />

within<br />

plan for solving the. problem includes bringing in representatives of other<br />

The<br />

who can furnish needed resources on a coordinated and cooperative basis.<br />

agencies<br />

DISCUSSION:<br />

RIDDER asked what was considered satisfactQry placement for the<br />

SENATOR<br />

being helped. MR. HARRIS commented that most persons would strive for<br />

persons<br />

as far up the emplonent ladder as his intelligence and amibitfon will<br />

placement<br />

him. MR. PEMBERTON added that in the WIN/Program they may follow up on an<br />

take<br />

for as long as eight months. One of the assumptions in the past has<br />

individual<br />

that the individual aided by a service program will make it on his own.<br />

been<br />

is not always true. The WIN Program tries to stay with their clients until<br />

This<br />

is well on his way.<br />

he<br />

MR. FREEN's question regarding the provision of transportation for<br />

To<br />

on the WIN program . PEMBERTON replied that this was not customary,<br />

persons<br />

but that the service was available in some areas.<br />

DALY agreed that the problem of transportation was only one of many<br />

MRS.<br />

which the Department deals. The barriers to employment are many and varied<br />

with<br />

may involve the lack of day care centers, problems of salary garnishment,<br />

and<br />

to secure bonding, employment requirements, high school diploma require-<br />

inability<br />

to name a few. She also mentioned briefly an intensive outreach program<br />

ments,<br />

the number of employment offices located in population centers. The Washing-<br />

and<br />

ton Indian is a target of the outreach program, too.<br />

CARSON made the comment that the Denny Committee, the Governor's Task<br />

MR.<br />

on Executive Organization, has made a recommendation for a Department<br />

Force<br />

Manpower and Industry which would be composed of the present Employment<br />

of<br />

Department, the Department of Labor and Industries, and the Division<br />

Security<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation. He asked MRS. DALY if she thought this could be<br />

of<br />

practical organization. S. DALY replied that they had just received copies<br />

a<br />

the report, and that their staff had not discussed it, but that she thought<br />

of<br />

would be workable. MR. CARSON remarked that MRS. DALY had mentioned their<br />

it<br />

with the Department of Labor and Industries to which she responded<br />

relationship,<br />

it was very good.<br />

that<br />

HEALTH DEPARTMENT<br />

PEYTON introduced DR. JESS SPIELHOLZ, Deputy Director, State Depart-<br />

MR.<br />

of Health, and DR. RHESA PENN, former Acting Head of the Crippld Children's<br />

ment<br />

A summary of DR. PENN'S comments on the services of the Crippled<br />

Services.<br />

Services follows.<br />

Children's<br />

Service, DR, PENN said, originated underthe Social ecuri.ty Act of<br />

The<br />

The legal basis for the service in the state is contained in Washington<br />

196.<br />

law, Chapter 129, Laws of 1941. The purpose of the service is to help<br />

State<br />

that children of the state havethe best possible chance to become<br />

assure<br />

healthy contributing adults.<br />

Four general areas of service characterize the program. These are prevention,<br />

171


diagnostic services, and treatment. The preventive aspects of<br />

casefinding,<br />

program are concerned with the early identification of conditions that<br />

the<br />

lead to handicapping defects, and include treatment to break this train<br />

may<br />

events and services to reduce the degree of disability when primary or<br />

of<br />

secondary prevention is not possible.<br />

is concerned with the promotion of understanding leading to<br />

Casefinding<br />

of potentially handicapping conditions, and early identification.<br />

suspicion<br />

are encouraged from sources likely to have contact with children<br />

Referrals<br />

are handicapped or potentially handicapped The service also participates<br />

who<br />

promotes screening programs for early identification and supports referrals<br />

and<br />

diagnostic facilities where help may be provided through education and<br />

to<br />

counseling and assistance given in overcoming obstacles.<br />

services are part of the program to assist in assuring there<br />

Diagnostic<br />

appropriate evaluation of each child suspected of having an actual or<br />

is<br />

potential handicap.<br />

services look to the development of a plan that goes beyond<br />

Treatment<br />

immediate goal of correcting a defect, or decreasing its effect to provid-<br />

the<br />

assistance toward the achievement of a long term goal that of becoming<br />

ing<br />

healthy contributing adult.<br />

a<br />

in the service exist, DR. PENN said, primarily because of<br />

Limitations<br />

funds, leading to limited personnel. He noted two general restric-<br />

restricted<br />

tions, one in medical eligibility, a second in financial eligibility.<br />

eligibility limits the program generally to relatively severe<br />

Medical<br />

chronic conditions where there is a reasonable hope for improvement under<br />

and<br />

A list of these conditions would include the following: congenital<br />

treatment.<br />

of the cardiovascular systems, and, to a limitedextent, of the central<br />

defects<br />

system, the genito-urinary system, and gastrointestinal system, ortho-<br />

nervous<br />

defects (including amputation); conditions leading to loss of hearing;<br />

pedic<br />

requiring plastic reconstruction; cleft lip and palate; metabolic disor-<br />

defects<br />

possibly leading to mental retardation.<br />

ders<br />

eligibility does not apply to casefinding and some supportive<br />

Financial<br />

and diagnostic services. It does apply to specific treatment services.<br />

care<br />

general, a family of four with anincome of less than $4,000 is eligible,<br />

In<br />

consideration is given to other factors. In borderline cases the family<br />

but<br />

is encouraged to help with payments, or to reimburse the agency.<br />

PENN provided the following figures showing services provided for<br />

DR.<br />

period July i, 1967 through June 30, 1968.<br />

the<br />

Total number of children receiving physician services: 4,193<br />

total number of conditions tabulated for the 4,193 children who<br />

The<br />

services was 4,588..<br />

received<br />

172


Major categories of dagnosis"<br />

palsy 451<br />

Cerebral<br />

with hearing 1,219<br />

Associated<br />

conditions 969<br />

Musculoskeletal<br />

heart malformations 117<br />

Congenital<br />

Cleft lip and palate 424<br />

TOTAL CONDITIONS 4,588<br />

for future development will be directed toward improving the<br />

Efforts<br />

of home communities to provide care in each of the categories of<br />

capacity<br />

listed in the foreoin table. Other goals will include efforts to<br />

service<br />

that outside assistance is available to meet needs not provided for<br />

assure<br />

the commun±ty. Improvements in fnding will be sought to meet rising<br />

within<br />

to cover categories not presently covered (such as cystic fibrosis,<br />

costs,<br />

neurologic disorders) and to assure.complete, rather than partial<br />

epilepsy,<br />

of needs in implementing plans for treatment. Implied in the latter<br />

meeting<br />

is the development of broader and more specific agreements with resources<br />

goal<br />

than the Crippled Children's Services.<br />

other<br />

16,000 children have eligible defects as compared with the 4,000+<br />

Some<br />

in 1968, DR. PENN pointed out.<br />

served<br />

pattern we hope to develop in the future, DR. PENN concluded, is based<br />

The<br />

the belief that each individual should be under a life-long system of<br />

upon<br />

improvement which would help him understand himself as an individual,<br />

health<br />

and.why he functions as he does, and the value of this individuality both<br />

how<br />

himself and in others. He should know that health is an asset in achieving<br />

in<br />

individual potential and know what to do to promote it and also how to<br />

his<br />

and avoid health hazards. When unavoidable health problems occur he<br />

perceive<br />

meet.them in a way to diminish detrimental effects and he should be<br />

should<br />

aware of and practice specific preventive measures.<br />

development of such a system exceeds the capacity of traditional health<br />

The<br />

and health programs, public and private. Ideally, it must include<br />

professionals<br />

fields of education, social welfare, economics and others, and will require<br />

the<br />

use of a very broad spectrum of personnel whose educational level extends<br />

the<br />

from almost none to highly specialized professionals.<br />

such a broad system for health improvement, the need will exist<br />

Under<br />

dealing with potential or actual handicaps. The capabilities developed<br />

for<br />

the Crippled Children's Services, whether continued under that name or<br />

under<br />

will have an important contribution to make, DR. PENN stated.<br />

another,<br />

such a system, primary prevention would be the most important<br />

Under<br />

with individual needs the basic guiding factor, and a complete meet-<br />

service,<br />

ing of these needs the uitimate goal.<br />

SPIELHOLZ, following DR. PENN, conented that the Crippled Children's<br />

DR.<br />

is one of several units within a broader spectrum. It is not an<br />

Service<br />

173


service, but is integrated with other services provided by the Depart-<br />

isolated<br />

of Health. Over the years, he added, the Department has had a contract<br />

ment<br />

the Division of Vocational Reh.bilitation, providing for methods of referral<br />

with<br />

the two agencies and defining areas where there is mutual interest.<br />

between<br />

mutually satisfactory relationship between the Division and the<br />

Another<br />

has been in effect for many years, DR. SPIELHO&Z said. This is a<br />

Department<br />

arrangement at the community level where local health officers (who<br />

working<br />

physicians in the field of public health) provide medical consultation<br />

are<br />

local vocational rehabilitation officers. The 39 counties of the state are<br />

to<br />

into 25 health districts, each with a health officer. In a few of<br />

divided<br />

these a practicing physician serves as a part-time health officer.<br />

are still unique among the states, DR. SPIELHOLZ emphasized, in this<br />

We<br />

between health officers and vocational counselors, a relationship<br />

relationship<br />

was first developed on a voluntary basis and was then continued under a<br />

which<br />

agreement between the two agencies. The health officer is avail-<br />

cooperative<br />

to the counselor for reviewing cases, for helping with the solution of<br />

able<br />

problems, and sometimes serves by directing attention to community<br />

medical<br />

resources which might be useful in the rehabilitation process.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

SENATOR RIDDER'S question about the provision of medical services,<br />

To<br />

SPIELHOLZ explained that the role of the medical consultant was not to give<br />

DR.<br />

medical services, but to provide medical advice, to help the counselor<br />

direct<br />

the case, to point out resources in the community, and to insure<br />

understand<br />

the medical components of a case be integrated. In the day-to-day opera-<br />

that<br />

of the Crippled Children's Service, the program concern is primarily<br />

tion<br />

children with complicated conditions who need not only medical skills,<br />

with<br />

help in social and vocational adjustment. A staffing is part of the plan<br />

but<br />

each case and may involve school people, a vocational counselor,.a public<br />

for<br />

caseworker and others. The whole child and what happens to him is<br />

assistance<br />

important.<br />

GRIDLEY asked about services for the emotionally disturbed child and<br />

MRS.<br />

family.<br />

his<br />

SPIELHOLZ replied that the philosophy of the program is to give help<br />

DR.<br />

families to aid in the early identification of any deviation from normal<br />

to<br />

Psychiatric clinics throughout the state are able to refer any case<br />

behavior.<br />

the local health officer.<br />

to<br />

ADAMS described briefly the Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children<br />

DR.<br />

Spokane where facilities, money and staff are available to take care of any<br />

in<br />

child in the state who meets their requirements.<br />

reply to a question about an orthodontia program, DR. SPIELHOLZ agreed<br />

In<br />

services were important and frequently very necessary. Two factors,<br />

these<br />

slowed the program: excessive costs, and the scarcity of orthodon-<br />

however,<br />

The dental program, he said, was developing very slowly.<br />

tists.<br />

174


PIELHOLZ concluded by saying that the public health program feels<br />

DR.<br />

close to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, both in goals and<br />

very<br />

methods. Whatever structure develops, he expressed the hope that it would<br />

in<br />

the present relationship.<br />

strengthen<br />

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES<br />

PEYTON introduced . HAROLD PETRIE, Director, State Department of<br />

MR.<br />

and Industries, who began his remarks b X expressing concern over the<br />

Labor<br />

of planning bodies at work, naming the comprehensive health plan-<br />

multiplicity<br />

agency, the Planning Commission for Vocat'ionai Rehabilitation, and the<br />

ning<br />

Reorganization Committee. He suggested that perhaps a coordinator to<br />

Denny<br />

all planning activities might be in order.<br />

coordinate<br />

between the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the<br />

Relationships<br />

of Labor and Industries have been very amiable throughout the years,<br />

Department<br />

said, and hopefully will remain that way. The function of the Department<br />

he<br />

defined by law and its rehabilitation efforts are limited to physical restora-<br />

is<br />

services for injured workmen. The Department's goal is to return the<br />

tion<br />

worker to employment as soon as possible. The Division's goal, he<br />

injured<br />

thought, was somewhat broader in its scope and viewpoint.<br />

a survey of workers covered by the Department MR. PETRIE provided<br />

From<br />

following figures: Between 600,000 and 700,000 workers are under the<br />

the<br />

industrial insurance program; in any one annual period 123,000 to 125,000<br />

state<br />

be injured, and about 80 percent will require the one-time services of a<br />

will<br />

20,000 22,000 will be injured severely enough to keep them away<br />

physician;<br />

work for three days or more; 4,000 of the latter will end up with permanent<br />

from<br />

residuals, more than half of themback injuries.<br />

the 4,000, 135 will sustain fatalinjuries; between 130 and 150 will<br />

Of<br />

declared totally and permanently disabled. It is with this group, somewhere<br />

be<br />

iS0 and 4,000 that serious problems in rehabilitation occur for the<br />

between<br />

Department.<br />

PETRIE drew attention to statements in Rehabilitation in. Washingo n<br />

MR.<br />

referring to page 71where the sentences appear: "The Department of<br />

State,<br />

and Industries administers the Industrial Insurance (Title 51RCW) which<br />

Labor<br />

the necessary compensation, time-loss from job and medical aid<br />

provides<br />

for workers injured within the scope of extrahazardous employment.<br />

benefits<br />

degree of rehabilitation involved includes physical conditioning and job-<br />

The<br />

services which the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation could easily<br />

placement<br />

provide."<br />

the top of page 72, MR. PETRIE also read this statement: "It is<br />

From<br />

be noted, however, that if such referral and job placement services could<br />

to<br />

provided by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, the funds available<br />

be<br />

them would be tripled because of. the federal matching grant formula."<br />

for<br />

PETRIE said he hoped there was no correlation between these two<br />

MR.<br />

and that they did no.t suggest that the Division should assume the<br />

statements<br />

175


of job placement, either partially or exclusively, for Labor and Industry<br />

role<br />

The Division, he continued, should have no anxieties regarding the<br />

cases.<br />

center operated by the Department, since the Department does<br />

rehabilitation<br />

in any sense attempt to maintain a total rehabilitation center as the<br />

not<br />

term is understood by rehabilitation people.<br />

Department, V[R. PETRIE continued, has a responsibility to return<br />

The<br />

to gainful employment as soon as possible, an obligation which they<br />

workers<br />

to both employer and employee, and one which they attempt to meet and will<br />

owe<br />

to meet with whatever tools are available. To meet this responsi-<br />

continue<br />

he feels it is quite necessary to havenot only professionally trained<br />

bility<br />

available, but also people with a day-to-day knowledge of the<br />

counselors<br />

field. This is the reason for maintaining an active relationship<br />

employment<br />

the Division and with Employment Security a relationship which Labor<br />

with<br />

Industries has no intention of disturbing. The Department also calls upon<br />

and<br />

officials who are aware of employment possibilities within a given<br />

labor<br />

and upon maagement, too, for the quickest possible placement,<br />

community,<br />

job placement seems to be the answer for any given person.<br />

whenever<br />

PETRIE described as "gray areas" those situations where one group<br />

MR.<br />

look at an individual and say that DVR training is needed while another<br />

might<br />

group-might say that only job placement is needed.<br />

costs for the injuredworker who does not go back to work are<br />

Pension<br />

Thirty thousand dollars is needed to establish a monthly income for<br />

high.<br />

worker for the rest of his life. The actual charge assessed against the<br />

that<br />

is $19,750 an amount which is a great incentive for him to see that<br />

employer<br />

accidents do not happen.<br />

are helpful in effortsto return an Employers injured to a job,<br />

workman<br />

PETRIE said. Difficulties are encountered with the small employer who<br />

MR.<br />

not be able to restructure his.work e£fort to re-employ the injured worker.<br />

may<br />

larger employer is usually able to make room for his own injuredworker,<br />

The<br />

is unwilling to take on a worker injured while working for another employer.<br />

but<br />

this injured worker requires a great deal of emplo,ent "know how."<br />

Placing<br />

understanding of the industrial insurance law, and the Labor and Industries<br />

an<br />

program.<br />

LARSON asked how the second injury clause in the State Industrial<br />

MR.<br />

Act affected the rehiring of a worker.<br />

Insurance<br />

PETRIE described Washington's "Second Injury Fund" as being broad<br />

MR.<br />

the sense that all pre-existing disabilities are considered when disability<br />

in<br />

is made between the second injury and prior disabilities; but is<br />

apportionment<br />

or restrictive in the sense that it can only be applied when a workman<br />

narrow<br />

placed on the total and permanent disability rolls. In other words, there<br />

is<br />

be no cost apportionment when disability is temporary only.<br />

can<br />

such time as the Second Injury Fund is applied, a physician is asked<br />

At<br />

respond to the theoretical question, "What wouldthis workman's disability<br />

to<br />

been (resulting from.the industrial injury) if he did not in fact have<br />

have<br />

pre-existing disability?" The employer's cost experience is then assessed<br />

any<br />

only with the amount of such limited disability and not the cost of the<br />

176


esulting from the combined effects of the second injury and pre-<br />

disability<br />

disability.<br />

existing<br />

working with DVR, MR. PETRIE added, the Department feels that at no<br />

In<br />

can it abdicate any of its responsibility and say to DVR, "This is yours,<br />

time<br />

take over." Each claim calls for the most particular kind of cooperation<br />

you<br />

the two agencies. Statutory authority has been requested to give Labor<br />

between<br />

Industries the right to carry a workman on time los disability after he<br />

and<br />

reached maximum physical restoration. Many times the man's physician may<br />

has<br />

the workman is ready for re-employment, but the man himself is not ready<br />

say<br />

he does not have a job, and does not know how to apply for one. The<br />

because<br />

cannot close out this claim until the man is back at work. It<br />

Department<br />

to carry the workman in a temporary disability status, continuing his<br />

attempts<br />

until the time when a job is found for him and he is at work in that<br />

benefits<br />

This is done daily with the help of the Division of Vocational Rehabili-<br />

job.<br />

tation.<br />

commenting on the second injury clause DR. ADAMS remarked that because<br />

In<br />

the law there is an understandable reluctance on the part of the employer<br />

of<br />

hire people with a previous disability. He. thought some type of waiver<br />

to<br />

indicated. Later he asked why should a man who lost an arm in a hunting<br />

was<br />

transfer the cost of that injury on to his employer. Another meer<br />

accident<br />

that the employer would probably rather hire someone who didn't have<br />

commented<br />

a problem to start with.<br />

PINTO wondered what happened to the workman when the employer payment<br />

MRS.<br />

stopped.<br />

PETRIE replied that of the 23,000 injured workers, only a few end up<br />

MR.<br />

a permanent disability. The claim is closed when a man is ready to go<br />

with<br />

to work. Labor and Industries does not have funds to pay for training.<br />

back<br />

only thing the Department can do is make direct payments to the workman.<br />

The<br />

does not try to maintain any type of training facility or program. This<br />

It<br />

paid"for by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. The Department tries<br />

is<br />

find out as .soon as possible after an injury whether a potential problem<br />

to<br />

for the Workman. Most of the problems develop after the man stays off<br />

exists<br />

work for 60 days or more.<br />

question from MRS. GRIDLEY drew the response from MR. PETRIE that the<br />

A<br />

merger of departments recommended in the Denny report would not cause<br />

proposed<br />

the Department any problems.<br />

OLIVER commented as the discussion closed that the Division, in<br />

MR.<br />

to a request from k. PETRIE, intends to increase the number of DVR<br />

response<br />

assigned to Labor and Industry cases. He added that the 1945 work-<br />

counselors<br />

agreement between the two agencies had been very satisfactory.<br />

ing<br />

DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS<br />

CONTE began by saying he was very glad to have an opportunity to<br />

DR.<br />

on the very broad and exciting subject of rehabilitation where steps<br />

speak<br />

now being taken to accomplish an oft-stated goal to make vocational<br />

are<br />

services possible and available to all residents of the state.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

177


esidents in our state institutions, numbering 12,000, are part of<br />

The<br />

total residents of the state to whom services should be available, he said.<br />

the<br />

relationship between the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and<br />

The<br />

Department of Institutions is historical, he continued. Over the course<br />

the<br />

a ten-year tenure in Washington, he reported, he has had.the assistance<br />

of<br />

the DVR staff in the state hospitals and in the corrections program. One<br />

of<br />

the problems they have faced together is that they hve never had adequate<br />

of<br />

In the state hospitals, a population of 7,000 had the services of<br />

coverage.<br />

a Division counselor for one day a month. This, DR. CONTE noted, is frustrating.<br />

a relationship that has been plagued by manpower shortages, he felt<br />

For<br />

one between the two agencies had been very good. Every conceivable topic '-<br />

the<br />

employment, and rehabilitation has been discussed. The interest<br />

training<br />

been unlimited, but the frustration has been profound.<br />

has<br />

a new relationship is beginning, marked by new interest, because new<br />

Now<br />

have recently become available. The Department and the Division at the<br />

funds<br />

level have entered into a memorandum of understanding containing two<br />

state<br />

proposals: [i) to make vocational rehabilitation services available<br />

important<br />

individuals in institutions who may be eligible for such services under the<br />

to<br />

Plan and the Federal Rehabilitation Act;and (2) to overcome the manpower<br />

State<br />

by building a rehabilitation Staff through a training Program for<br />

shortage<br />

vocational rehabilitation officers. Everyone involved in this train-<br />

beginning<br />

effort is in a position to further vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

ing<br />

DR. CONTE continued, the Department wants to see the 12,000<br />

Specifically,<br />

of state institutions included in this total goal. This does not<br />

residents<br />

that all of the 12,000 are in need of rehabilitation services, but this<br />

mean<br />

must be given attention so that those in need may be singled out. The<br />

segment<br />

clientele is there among the mentally ill, the mentally retarded, the<br />

potential<br />

offender, the adult offender, the probationer and parolee, and in the<br />

juvenile<br />

homes operated by the Department. ¢nen we think of vocational rehabili-<br />

veterans'<br />

tation services, we must think of all of them, he stressed.<br />

the problems of these people could be reduced to a single common denom-<br />

If<br />

it would generally be found that the residents of our institutions are<br />

inator,<br />

some way or another insecure people. They have reached their present situa-<br />

in<br />

becuase they have had some faulty learning experiences, have not profited<br />

tion<br />

normal relationships, and for some reason have not been able to approach<br />

from<br />

in a mature fashion, in keeping with their age or situation in life. For<br />

life<br />

reason, these are people who do not know how to relate, or do not<br />

whatever<br />

effectively, and whose feelings of insecurity and inadequacy have kept<br />

relate<br />

from relating to society. In addition, multiple physical difficulties<br />

them<br />

contributed to their insecurity.<br />

have<br />

of the people in institutions require re___habilitation; another segment<br />

Some<br />

habilitation, DR. CONTE pointed out. This is a matter of conditioning<br />

needs<br />

for the first time to approach life and its responsibilities. These are<br />

them<br />

who are out of step, who have not been able to succeed. They need help<br />

people<br />

and support to reach a better adjustment to society.<br />

178


the schools for the mentally retarded there are about 4,000 individuals<br />

In<br />

intellectual capacity is not what it should be. They can be helped if<br />

whose<br />

difficulty can be clearly defined and they can be given proper supporting<br />

their<br />

Multiple physical defects are a part of their problem.<br />

tools.<br />

correctional institutions hold individuals who, in their lack of<br />

State<br />

Qould destroy the rights of others, and in a hostile way act out<br />

maturity<br />

resentment of others. Because of their actions, "society has decided<br />

their<br />

incarceration is the answer.<br />

that<br />

juvenile institutions within the state there are young people who have<br />

In<br />

out of school, who have carried hostility one step further to violate<br />

dropped<br />

rights of others. A pattern of failure is manifested here. Something<br />

the<br />

to be happening today that makes it more difficult for children to iden-<br />

seems<br />

with their own sexual roles. More and more children are turning to drugs<br />

tify<br />

an escape.<br />

as<br />

physical handicaps, epilepsy, disorders of the central nervous<br />

Other<br />

are among the disabilities which characterize the 12,000, DR. CONTE<br />

system,<br />

said. This is the clientele where clients for rehabilitation will be found.<br />

is it so important to worry about the work a man does and to train<br />

Why<br />

for a vocation? There are those who say, !'Don't worry about him in the<br />

him<br />

But it is never too soon to begin a vocational effort. The<br />

institutions."<br />

a man does contributesto hisown image. When an individual is helped<br />

work<br />

find a place in the world, this is meaningful to his total personality<br />

to<br />

We are trying to help people develop feelings of security. This<br />

structure.<br />

the overlying reason why vocational rehabilitation in institutions has a<br />

is<br />

approach to service. In any approach to vocational rehabilitation services<br />

new<br />

DR. CONTE suggested four areas for consideration:<br />

Evaluation ofthe candidate. This should go beyond the questions,<br />

(i)<br />

there a skill or, is there a job? The individual and his total<br />

is<br />

situation must be reviewed, The depth of the problem and<br />

life<br />

cepacity of the individual to improve his ability must be<br />

the<br />

assessed.<br />

A medical evaluation. Every medical problem must be thoroughly<br />

(2)<br />

Some minor medical problems can completely sabotage<br />

investigated.<br />

all the rehabilitation.services in the world.<br />

Social and psychological problems. These are part of the total<br />

(3)<br />

effort. It is important to know something about the<br />

counseling<br />

not only at the moment of discovery, but at the time he<br />

family,<br />

to the family. Much of his adjustment depends on his family<br />

returns<br />

their support. If it is ineffective, professional efforts go<br />

and<br />

the drain.<br />

down<br />

A specific training_ proggm.. This is a new effort for both the<br />

(4)<br />

of Institutions and the Division and is concerned with<br />

Department<br />

179


DISCUSSION:<br />

comprehensive vocational rehabilitation services to<br />

providing<br />

of institutions who are eligible for these services<br />

residents<br />

the terms of the State Plan. To meet anticipated manpower<br />

under<br />

a program has been devised to provide supervised<br />

shortages,<br />

for entry level vocational rehabilitation officers, thus<br />

training<br />

a pool of experienced personnel.<br />

creating<br />

ST. LAURENT asked how many of the 12,900 now in institutions would be<br />

MR.<br />

to receive and profit from rehabilitation services.<br />

able<br />

CONTE replied that no recent survey had been made, and that making one<br />

DR.<br />

a costly and time-consuming process which in the final figure would show<br />

was<br />

candidates for service than the program could reach. Hopefully, as the<br />

more<br />

becomes better staffed, some statistics for long-range planning will<br />

program<br />

be forthcoming.<br />

HOLDEN noted that at Western State Hospital the VRO stationed there<br />

MR.<br />

able to rehabilitate as many clients annually as a counselor in the regular<br />

was<br />

program.<br />

OLIVER and MR. NOREN confirmed that about 49 per cent of the clients<br />

MR.<br />

in an early adult corrections Program in Spokane were successfully<br />

accepted<br />

rehabilitated.<br />

to preventive programs, MRS. GRIDLEY expressed her interest in<br />

Referring<br />

rehabilitation programs being developed in schools and the success<br />

vocational<br />

in these programs. She also felt there was much to be said for programs<br />

achieved<br />

the community level which keep the child at home.<br />

at<br />

CONTE felt that most social and health programs are only scratching<br />

DR.<br />

surface where prevention is concerned.<br />

the<br />

ADAMS wondered if in some cases people might be kept out of institu-<br />

DR.<br />

for too long a time. There are some, he thought who ought to go in<br />

tions<br />

sooner than they do.<br />

the matter of community care versus institutionalization, DR. CONTE<br />

In<br />

that many communities have not developed the kind of services needed<br />

remarked<br />

these people. But the hope does exist that some day those who are mentally<br />

for<br />

mentally retarded, or who are public offenders may have services within<br />

ill,<br />

their communities that are as sophisticated as those now available in institutions.<br />

are<br />

ST. LAURENT asked about the work release Program and how candidates<br />

MR.<br />

selected.<br />

fifty men are presently in this program, DR. CONTE replied. The law<br />

About<br />

by the 1967 State Legislature) calls for the release of an individual<br />

(enacted<br />

180


a correctional institution for employment or training. An individual who<br />

from<br />

the institution under this program must return each evening to a super-<br />

leaves<br />

situation. Usually this is the county jail and for this reason many have<br />

vised<br />

the service. No set rules exist for the selection of candidates.<br />

refused<br />

is based upon a variety of factors, primari'ly upon the man's record<br />

Eligibility<br />

in the institution and the offense that put him there-. The need for<br />

while<br />

to take care of these cases is apparent, DR. CONTE agreed. Goodwill<br />

homes<br />

and the Kiwanis Club, in Spokane, Were mentioned by MRS. POWERS<br />

Industries<br />

and DR. ADAMS as providing a needed service in this area.<br />

POWERS asked about Birch Cottage. DR. CONTE described it as a well-<br />

MRS.<br />

example of a group type service for young people. Supervision in<br />

publicized<br />

all phases of the life there helps these young people to understand themselves.<br />

CARSON asked DR. CONTE whether he would like to see the vocational<br />

MR.<br />

officer and the parole officer working with the same client,<br />

rehabilitation<br />

under the same roof. And DR. PALMER wondered whether the VRO and<br />

perhaps<br />

correctional counselor might some day be the same person.<br />

the<br />

CONTE felt that people in state officesin Olympia could not'decide<br />

DR.<br />

people ought to collaborate with each other. A good idea in Olympia is not<br />

what<br />

a good idea for people in the field, he cautioned. He said he would<br />

always<br />

to sanction and encourage the above proposal, and hope that the people<br />

like<br />

in the field could try it out to see whether it would work.<br />

GRIDLEY mentioned programs where the social worker is the one who<br />

MRS.<br />

counseling and guidance and said shethought new and complex services<br />

gives<br />

were being developed to meet new needs.<br />

respect to people employed in a program DR. CONTE believes that the<br />

With<br />

barriers between disciplines are becoming blurred. He commented<br />

traditional<br />

on the assignment of people to do a job when they have the ability<br />

briefly<br />

do it, regardless of academic degrees. In dealing with the human element,<br />

to<br />

individual and how he sees himself in relation to others is important.<br />

the<br />

of tese people would not be easy. The professional social worker,<br />

Selection<br />

out of school, needs training to work with the mentally ill in hospitals.<br />

just<br />

are now changing their training programs. In the 40's and 50's,<br />

Universities<br />

recalled, training help was not available, but patients nevertheless were<br />

he<br />

to leave the mental hospitals.because some warm loving person there had<br />

able<br />

given them something they needed.-<br />

of excerpt from approved minutes of Commission<br />

(End<br />

December 6, 1968)<br />

meeting,<br />

181


coordination of the several programs was a particular<br />

The<br />

of the members of the Planning Commission. It was pointed<br />

concern<br />

that some of the interagency agreements between Vocational<br />

out<br />

and other service agencies were quite old. Atthe<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

1968 publication date of REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE,<br />

June<br />

most recent agreement of the Division of VocNtional Rehabili-<br />

the<br />

with the Department of Public Assistance was in 1954; with<br />

tation<br />

Department of Labor and Industries, 1945; with the Department<br />

the<br />

Institutions, 1966; with the Health Department, 1963; and with<br />

of<br />

Employment Security Department, 1967.<br />

the<br />

school agreements have been signed with more<br />

Cooperative<br />

a dozen different school districts. These are all of recent<br />

than<br />

date.<br />

October 18, 1968, another agreement between the State<br />

On<br />

of Institutions and Vocational Rehabilitation was signed.<br />

Department<br />

agreement calls for the rehabilitation agency to begin a pro-<br />

This<br />

of services in each major service area of the Department of<br />

gram<br />

A full-grown program is the goal of the agreement.<br />

Institutions.<br />

new counselors would need to be added. The efforts, of the two<br />

Many<br />

according to the agreement, would be directed toward build-<br />

agencies,<br />

an effective bridge forthose leaving institutions.<br />

ing<br />

agreement was signed in October. At the time of the<br />

This<br />

of this planning project, there had been no implementa-<br />

completion<br />

The federal cutback in funds during the middle of a fiscal<br />

tion.<br />

prevented the employment of the coordinator called for in the<br />

year<br />

agreement.<br />

State Employment Service<br />

1955 agreement between the Employment Security Depart-<br />

A<br />

and the Vocational Rehabilitation program, and still in effect<br />

ment<br />

1968, provided the framework for the working relationship between<br />

in<br />

two agencies.<br />

the<br />

MDTA Program<br />

Rehabilitation has been providing medical<br />

Vocational<br />

and minor medical services to referred Manpower<br />

examinations<br />

Training Act cases of the Employment Security Depart-<br />

Development<br />

It is assumed that this important service will be continued.<br />

ment.<br />

Pub l i c<br />

We l fare<br />

Public Assistance programs in the United States are<br />

The<br />

rapidly. A higher percentage of the clients of the Voca-<br />

growing<br />

Rehabilitation Division in the State of Washington are<br />

ational<br />

Assistance recipients than any other state, according to<br />

Public<br />

182


figures. It is anticipated that in the years to come Public<br />

recent<br />

clients will receive priority for vocational rehabili-<br />

Assistance<br />

services. The budget document prepared by the Division of<br />

tation<br />

Rehabilitation, outlining its plans for the biennium<br />

Vocational<br />

begins July 1969, has this to say about th 9 Department of<br />

which<br />

Assistance:<br />

Public<br />

Rehabilitationof PublicAssistance Recipients<br />

major emphasis toward vocational rehabilitation of Public<br />

A<br />

recipients must be maintained. The Work In-<br />

Assistance<br />

Program, which was authorized by the 1967 Amend-<br />

centive<br />

to the Social Security Act, will be administered in<br />

ments<br />

State of Washington by the Department of Employment<br />

the<br />

with referrals in selected categories by the<br />

Security<br />

of Public Assistance. It is now estimated that<br />

Department<br />

35 percent of the applicants to the Work In-<br />

approximately<br />

Program will be referred to the Division of Voca-<br />

centive<br />

Rehabilitation because of need for more extensive<br />

tional<br />

intensive services if they are to be removed from the<br />

and<br />

rolls and placed in productive employment. The<br />

welfare<br />

has participated in joint planning with the<br />

Division<br />

of Public Assistance and Employment. Security<br />

Departments<br />

will continue to operate in accordance with plans made<br />

and<br />

the Community Action Motivation Program in Washington.<br />

under<br />

Evaluation and Inventory Project (Public Assistance<br />

An<br />

grant has been made to the Division to evaluate<br />

Recipients)<br />

inventory the rehabilitation potential of a selected<br />

and<br />

of Public Assistance recipients. Historically, the<br />

sample<br />

of Washington has provided vocational rehabilitation<br />

State<br />

to disabled Public Assistance recipients in in-<br />

services<br />

and sizeable numbers. Notwithstanding these regu-<br />

creasing<br />

increases in the population served, the Division of<br />

lar<br />

Rehabilitation has been aware of the need to<br />

Vocational<br />

even more extensive services to disabled Public<br />

provide<br />

recipients. As a result of this concern within<br />

Assistance<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and a similar<br />

the<br />

in the Department of Public Assistance, there has,<br />

concern<br />

a number of years, been close cooperation between<br />

for<br />

two agencies in order to provide more adequate ser-<br />

these<br />

to Public Assistance recipients.<br />

vices<br />

The project has multiple goals which include the following:<br />

The project will provide the capacity to do in-depth<br />

A.<br />

of Public Assistance recipients. We expect<br />

screening<br />

by this screening we will be able to identify<br />

that<br />

potential in recipients we have not<br />

rehabilitation<br />

previously attempted to rehabilitate;<br />

183


The project will provide us with more accurate infor-<br />

B.<br />

about the number of Public Assistance recip-<br />

mation<br />

who have a potential for vocational rehabilita-<br />

ients<br />

tion;<br />

The project will provide us the opportunity to experi-<br />

C.<br />

test and demonstrate the concept of team evalua-<br />

ment,<br />

tion for vocational rehabilitation;<br />

Operationally, this project will significantly enhance<br />

D.<br />

quality and increase quantity of services provided<br />

the<br />

to Public Assistance recipients.<br />

for increased services of vocational rehabilita-<br />

.Planning<br />

in the biennium will be related to project findings<br />

tion<br />

based on continuing cooperation with the State Depart-<br />

and<br />

of Public Assistance.<br />

ment<br />

project, with a basic purpose to reduce the number of<br />

This<br />

on public assistance rolls, was initiated in the autumn of<br />

persons<br />

soon after the foregoing budget document was written. However,<br />

1968,<br />

several months, the project director resigned and the project<br />

after<br />

now dormant. It does seem as if the project were well. organized<br />

is<br />

the project director during his tenure. The procedures, including<br />

by<br />

evaluation, were carefully written. The public assistance pro-<br />

their<br />

is also discussed on page 154.<br />

gram<br />

Education<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

every student who is need of vocational rehabili-<br />

That...<br />

should be served.<br />

tation<br />

this time approximately one-tenth of the secondary<br />

At<br />

special education students eligible for vocational rehabilita-<br />

level<br />

services are being provided those services. It is hoped that<br />

tion<br />

secondary level special education students be provided services<br />

all<br />

a cooperative school agreement. The Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

under<br />

has many different school systems which have requested co-<br />

Division<br />

operative agreements.<br />

Voluntary Organizations<br />

to voluntary organizations have increased. The<br />

Services<br />

Artificial Kidney Center has a contract with the Division of<br />

Seattle<br />

Rehabilitation which involves service to a number of indi-<br />

Vocational<br />

who would probably die if they did not have .the dialysis pro-<br />

viduals<br />

gram.<br />

184


Cedar Hills Alcoholic Treatment Center has been set up<br />

The<br />

connection with the King County (Seattle) Sheriff's Department.<br />

in<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation Division is participating with this<br />

The<br />

to insure the provision of rehabilitation services as.part of<br />

center<br />

treatment center program. The center at this time has only one<br />

the<br />

counselor assigned to,work with $1coholics. The<br />

rehabilitation<br />

of alcoholics is many times that which could be served<br />

population<br />

one counselor.<br />

by<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation in the State of<br />

The<br />

has had a powerful influence on grants to state academic<br />

Washington<br />

It is hoped that these academic institutions will<br />

institutions.<br />

have a powerful influence on Vocational Rehabilitation as a<br />

soon<br />

agency. There is a marvelous potential to transform counsel-<br />

state<br />

to elevate the state agency through the utilization of counsel-<br />

ing,<br />

trained in the graduate program at the University of Washington.<br />

ors<br />

services to the severely physically handicapped can be influenced<br />

The<br />

the model treatment given at the Physical Medicine and Rehabili-<br />

by<br />

section at the University of Washington Medical School. The<br />

tation<br />

Research Institute in the School of Social Work at the<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

of Washington, is doing some pioneering work-in the utili-<br />

University<br />

of family members in rehabilitation. The Child Development<br />

zation<br />

at the University of Washington has the finest facilities any-<br />

Center<br />

to study the development of handicapped people, including at-<br />

where<br />

toward work. A complete list of the pending and approved<br />

titudes<br />

resulting in grants from the Rehabilitation Services Admin-<br />

projects<br />

follows:<br />

istration<br />

Research and Demonstration<br />

and approved projects resulting from grants by Rehabili-<br />

Pending<br />

Services Administration and extending into the biennium<br />

tation<br />

including the following:<br />

of Washington Department of Education Graduate<br />

University<br />

in rehabilitation counseling<br />

program<br />

of Washington School of Medicine Training in<br />

University<br />

therapy<br />

physical<br />

of Washington School of Medicine Clinical teach-<br />

University<br />

in occupational therapy<br />

ing<br />

of Washington Physical medicine and rehabilitation<br />

University<br />

of Washington School of Social Work Training for<br />

University<br />

workers<br />

social<br />

of Washington School of Social Work Training in<br />

University<br />

nursing<br />

rehabilitation<br />

of Washington Speech and Hearing Clinic.- Expand<br />

University<br />

to train therapists<br />

program<br />

of Washington School of Social Work Education of<br />

University<br />

workers interested in mental retardation and<br />

social<br />

handicapped<br />

socially<br />

185


of Washington Department of Psychology Investi-<br />

University<br />

influence of special modeling and identification<br />

gate<br />

on the behavior of adolescent delinquent boys<br />

opportunities<br />

of Washington Division of Child Health Determine<br />

University<br />

of rehabilitation of young male homosexuals<br />

feasibility<br />

of Washington Department of Psychology Program<br />

University<br />

graduate study dealing With psychological aspects of<br />

of<br />

and the rehabilitation process<br />

disability<br />

of Washington Department of Physical Medicine and<br />

University<br />

Comprehensive evaluation and treatment<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

of Washington Research Institute (School of Social<br />

University<br />

Work)<br />

Foundation Rehab Center for Individuals with attitudinal<br />

Delta<br />

handicaps<br />

Washington State College To prepare certified clini-<br />

Eastern<br />

at master's level to serve in public and private<br />

cians<br />

and facilities concerned with rehabilitating<br />

agencies<br />

with speech and/or hearing impairments.<br />

adults<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation Research program to<br />

Division<br />

effectiveness of rehabilitation process in appli-<br />

study<br />

to Federal offenders.<br />

cation<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation Inservice staff training<br />

Division<br />

of Puget Sound Traineeships in occupational therapy<br />

University<br />

of Puget Sound Post graduate workshop Course in<br />

University<br />

therapy<br />

occupational<br />

River Community College Prepare. certified occupational<br />

Green<br />

assistants<br />

therapy<br />

Community College Improved vocational and academic<br />

Seattle<br />

opportunities for deaf people<br />

training<br />

Hearing and Speech Center, Inc. Establish comprehen-<br />

Seattle<br />

rehabilitation program for persons with deafness or<br />

sive<br />

hearing loss<br />

severe<br />

of Institutions Division of Handicapped Children<br />

Department<br />

Provide experience and training to help high<br />

(Fircrest)<br />

and college students become aware of the need and<br />

school<br />

to workwith mentally retarded<br />

opportunity<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation To develop techniques<br />

Division<br />

provision of rehabilitation services to disabled<br />

for<br />

rehabilitmtion potential is difficult to assess and<br />

whose<br />

because of cultural and environmental factors<br />

achieve<br />

projects are reviewed and approved by the Division in<br />

These<br />

with the provisions of Section 3 and Section 4 (a)<br />

accordance<br />

of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act. In each instance<br />

(i)<br />

Division, by its approval, must indicate that the project<br />

the<br />

to provide direct service to handicapped individuals<br />

proposes<br />

will make a substantial contribution to the solution of<br />

and/or<br />

rehabilitation problems in the State of Washington.<br />

vocational<br />

direct case services to handicapped persons are provided<br />

When<br />

part of the project operation, these individuals are either<br />

as<br />

by the Division and/or become clients of the Division.<br />

referred<br />

186


Division provides direct consultation to the grantee(s) by<br />

The<br />

on advisory committees and boards of trainee selection.<br />

serving<br />

Manpower Policy<br />

the major lecture, "Manpower Rehabilitation as a Public<br />

In<br />

delivered at the 1968 annual meeting of the National Rehab-<br />

Market,"<br />

Association, Paul M. Ellwood,Jr., M.D. of Minneapolis,<br />

ilitation<br />

the following statements:<br />

made<br />

the goal of national employment programs is to assure<br />

"<br />

greatest possible opportunity for employment to the largest pos-<br />

the<br />

number of clients at the lowest sound cost. This is another<br />

sible<br />

of saying that national manpower programs are faced with the ne-<br />

way<br />

of applying the principles of cost-effectiveness, which are,<br />

cessity<br />

course, identified with the exacting, coldly analytical decision-<br />

of<br />

processes of the defense department. Will this style of de-<br />

making<br />

be accepted by the professions and public officials<br />

cision-making<br />

engaged in rehabilitation and employment services?<br />

of the unemployed, likeall other fields,<br />

"Rehabilitation<br />

assume a limited supply of resources as a constant factor to be<br />

must<br />

with as a basic condition of programming and planning. Cost-<br />

reckoned<br />

is, of course, a method of determining whether a dollar<br />

effectiveness<br />

here will go farther than a dollar spent elsewhere. Theoreti-<br />

spent<br />

our limited dollars for unemployment programs could be expected<br />

cally,<br />

produce greater benefits for more people if they were allocated in<br />

to<br />

way."<br />

this<br />

rehabilitation services in the nation are 48<br />

Vocational<br />

old and nearly 40 in our state. The training and use of the<br />

years<br />

human resources are not a new public concern; only in the<br />

nation's<br />

have federally supported manpower programs emerged as a major<br />

1960's<br />

economic and socialpol±cy. As a result, the last half dozen<br />

tool.of<br />

have been filled with feverish activity. Now is an opportune<br />

years<br />

time to take stock.<br />

policy s aimed at developing and using the capac-<br />

Manpower<br />

of human beings as actual or potential members of the labor<br />

ities<br />

Although its central operational field is the labor market,<br />

force.<br />

policy also has a bearing upon economic, education, and mill-<br />

manpower<br />

policies, not to mention programs in welfare, antipoverty, voca-<br />

tary<br />

rehabilitation, and urban development. In fact, there is a<br />

tional<br />

dimension of almost every aspect of economic, social, and<br />

manpower<br />

policy.<br />

political<br />

as poverty may be alleviated and diminished by<br />

Insofar<br />

jobs and educating, training, or upgrading the members of<br />

creating<br />

families, manpower policy is centrally implicated. It is also<br />

poor<br />

in programs to provide people on welfare incentives to seek<br />

involved<br />

and hold jobs.<br />

187


a position paper by the National Manpower Policy Task<br />

In<br />

dated January 1969, and entitled "The Nation's Manpower<br />

Force,<br />

Programs," is the following:<br />

present challenge is to develop a coherent manpower<br />

"The<br />

not just for the moment but for the 1970's and beyond. The<br />

policy,<br />

lesson is that at the local level, where people are located<br />

first<br />

must be served, available manpower services should be provided<br />

and<br />

the basis of need, not impeded by diverse eligibility require-<br />

on<br />

varying administrative practices, or competing agencies. The<br />

ments,<br />

programs must be fused into a single comprehensive manpower<br />

separate<br />

a variety of services in varying mixed depending<br />

program--providing<br />

upon national conditions and local need."<br />

federal government is providing minimum income stand-<br />

The<br />

for those unable to work because they are too old, ill, or<br />

ards<br />

with family responsibilities. But those who can work should<br />

burdened<br />

provided with remedial education, training, physical restoration,<br />

be<br />

or jobs depending upon individual needs and capabilities.<br />

has been a ten-fold increase in money for federal<br />

There<br />

programs just since 1961. In the State of Washington these<br />

manpower<br />

have aided greatly in the rehabilitation of disabled indi-<br />

programs<br />

viduals.<br />

are a humane nation and we are a nation of businessmen.<br />

We<br />

we violate the principles of humanity and business when<br />

Yet<br />

we Continue permit large numbers of Americans to languish<br />

to<br />

the shadow of a serious handicap which could be mastered.<br />

in<br />

the conscience and the purse suffer when men and women<br />

Both<br />

could be self-reliant and productive are consigned to<br />

who<br />

futility and dependengy.<br />

the National Citizens Advisory<br />

--from<br />

on Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />

Committee<br />

1968<br />

188


Coordination With Other State Planning<br />

Poverty<br />

number of studies have shown that the poor have more<br />

A<br />

and emotional disabilities and mental retardation than<br />

physical<br />

who are not poor. In addition,there is a disproportionate<br />

those<br />

of poor peoplewho have multiple handicaps. Too frequently,<br />

number<br />

poor have the least ability and know-how in seeking solutions<br />

the<br />

their problems in connection with these disabilities.<br />

for<br />

SOUL ON ICE, Eldridge Cleaver expressed some of the<br />

In<br />

of one section of the poor as follows:<br />

feeling<br />

Americans are too easily deceived by a few smiles<br />

Black<br />

friendly gestures, by the passing of a few liberal-<br />

and<br />

laws which are left on the books to rot un-<br />

sounding<br />

and by the mushy speechmaking of a President who<br />

enforced,<br />

a past master of talking out of the thousand sides of<br />

is<br />

mouth. Such poetry does not guarantee the safe future<br />

his<br />

the black people in America. The black people must<br />

of<br />

a guarantee, they must be certain,they must be sure<br />

have<br />

all doubt that the reign of terror is ended and<br />

beyond<br />

just suspended, and that the future of their people<br />

not<br />

is secure.<br />

the 1968 Amendments to the Federal Vocational Rehab-<br />

With<br />

Law, came important changes. One of these is the extension<br />

ilitation<br />

the Vocational Rehabilitation program to include: "individuals<br />

of<br />

by reason of their youth or advanced age, low educa-<br />

disadvantaged<br />

attainments, ethnic or cultural factors, prison or delin-<br />

tional<br />

records, or other conditions which constitute a barrier to<br />

quency<br />

and other members of their families when the provision<br />

employment,<br />

vocational rehabilitation services to family members is necessary<br />

of<br />

for the rehabilitation of an individual described above."<br />

State is no longer the sparsely populated, fresh-<br />

Washington<br />

refuge from the congested metropolitan areas of the United States.<br />

air<br />

1950, the state has.gained approximately one million new resi-<br />

Since<br />

almost all added in urban areas. By 1975 the population will<br />

dents,<br />

approximately four million. Urban growth brings many problems.<br />

be<br />

and miserable conditions are often found in urban core areas.<br />

Unhumane<br />

lead to a brutal breakdown of human civilization. The individ-<br />

These<br />

becomes lost in the mass. Those who hurt most are the crippled,<br />

ual<br />

the ill, and the socially disadvantaged.<br />

1966 Oscar Lewis published LA VIDA, a study ofa Puerto<br />

In<br />

family in the culture of poverty in San Juan and in New York.<br />

Rican<br />

them he wrote, "In spite of the presence of considerable pathology,<br />

About.<br />

am impressed by the strengths in this family. I am impressed by<br />

I<br />

their fortitude, vitality, resilience and ability to cope with problems<br />

189


would paralyze many middle-class individuals. It takes a great<br />

which<br />

of staying power to live in their harsh and brutalizing environ-<br />

deal<br />

They are tough people, but they have their own sense of dig-<br />

ment.<br />

and morality and they are capable of kindness, generosity and<br />

nity<br />

They share food and clothing, help each other in mis-<br />

compassion.<br />

take in the homeless and cure the ill. "Money and material<br />

fortune,<br />

although important, do not motivate their major de-<br />

possessions,<br />

Their deepest need is for love, and their life is a re-<br />

cisions.<br />

lentless search for it."<br />

last twenty years have seen a flow from rural areas<br />

The<br />

the cities and a cross-current of former city dwellers to the<br />

into<br />

This created depressed rural communities and decaying core<br />

suburbs.<br />

This dreadful cycle continues. If we build vigorous, thriv-<br />

cities.<br />

communities in our rural areas then we halt and maybe even reverse<br />

ing<br />

migration that has led to so many problems, so much misery.<br />

the<br />

THE COISSION RECONDS:<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation develop more<br />

That<br />

methods of delivering vocational rehabilitation<br />

effective<br />

to handicapped Indians. Indians should be recruited<br />

services<br />

staff members counselors, aides, clerical assistants--<br />

as<br />

work with the reservation Indians and other concentrations<br />

to<br />

Indians.<br />

of<br />

rural areas have their disadvantaged persons and<br />

The<br />

areas just as the urban centers do. The Negro and the core<br />

blighted<br />

ghetto are matched by the Indian and the reservation, and the<br />

city<br />

and the farm labor camp. It is a problem that usually is<br />

migrant<br />

less frequently noticed but equally difficult to solve.<br />

pessimism of these people is reflected in this quote<br />

The<br />

THE.AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MALCOLM X. He, o course, was assassinated<br />

from<br />

before Grove Press published his book in 1964.<br />

knew that the black man had all the strikes against<br />

They<br />

that the white man kept the black man down, under<br />

him,<br />

his heel, unable-to get anywhere, really.<br />

are certain objectives and principles common to all<br />

There<br />

in the rehabilitation of public assistance recipients. Among<br />

states<br />

them are the following:<br />

goal in all states will be to increase substantially<br />

The<br />

number of public assistance applicants and recipients<br />

the<br />

rehabilitation and social services so that they<br />

provided<br />

be gainfully employed.<br />

can<br />

190


the vocational rehabilitation agency and the welfare<br />

Both<br />

will need to commit staff and funds to carry out<br />

agency<br />

the integrated program plan.<br />

resources of other welfare programa, of manpower<br />

The<br />

and of various other programs such as model<br />

programs,<br />

and neighborhood service centers should be taken<br />

cities<br />

account and utilized in the cooperative program.<br />

into<br />

approaches, including such measures as re-<br />

Innovative<br />

of staff, joint housing of staff, simplified<br />

development<br />

and case and administrative forms used in<br />

procedures<br />

by both agencies, the team approach in case plan-<br />

common<br />

and management, a cooperatively developed plan for<br />

ning<br />

and rehabilitation services for each client served,<br />

social<br />

involvement, the development of new resources<br />

community<br />

facilities, and experimentation in the organization<br />

and<br />

and delivery of services will be essential.<br />

guidelines for the development of an integrated<br />

These<br />

program plan for the vocational rehabilitation of public<br />

action<br />

applicants and recipients were stated in Bulletin 13,<br />

assistance<br />

ii, of REHABILITATION INTERAGENCY FOCUS.<br />

Volume<br />

Kenneth Barnes, in his 1968 lecture, "Planning for<br />

R.<br />

Service Needs in Rehabilitation Facilities" made this<br />

Psychological<br />

"The rhetoric of the psychologist abounds in verbal manipula-<br />

point,<br />

and verbal interpretations. Admitting and accepting the success<br />

tion<br />

the psychological model for upper and middle class America, it is<br />

of<br />

that we cannot solve the awesome problems of many disabled<br />

submitted<br />

most disadvantaged unless we apply the more non-verbal work model<br />

and<br />

environmental manipulation model, not reluctantly, but enthusias-<br />

or<br />

tically, throughout the rehabilitation processes offered in facilities."<br />

also stated in this lecture to psychologists, "A perva-<br />

He<br />

problem that perplexed rehabilitation personnel in the last score<br />

sive<br />

years was the matter of eligibility for service. Once upon a time,<br />

of<br />

same rehabilitation counselor who would have declared eligible<br />

the<br />

service a John Kennedy for his 'bad back, also most likely would<br />

for<br />

rejected an Oswald for 'no diagnostically identifiable disability. have TM<br />

unimaginative administrative and perhaps legal, interpretations<br />

These<br />

resolved by the 1965 and 1967 Vocational Rehabilitation Act<br />

were<br />

which clarified the concept of disability to emphasize the<br />

amendments<br />

disorders and the disadvantaged."<br />

behavioral<br />

services to the urban poor might best be<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

in a new kind of center. On December.7, 1968, the Commis-<br />

provided<br />

endorsed the concept of an Employment Evaluation and Service<br />

sion<br />

operated by Vocational Rehabilitation in Washington State.<br />

Center<br />

It is described in some detail in this book beginning on page 138.<br />

191


Mental Health Planning<br />

provided by the State of Washington's Department<br />

Statistics<br />

Institutions indicate that at this time 3,400 individuals of work-<br />

of<br />

age are discharged annually from the states three mental hospitals.<br />

ing<br />

all of these people are vocationally handicapped at the time<br />

Almost<br />

their furlough or discharge. Many of them would go into the world<br />

of<br />

work if this option were open to them. They often have problems<br />

of<br />

are manifested on the job. Vocational rehabilitation services<br />

that<br />

indicated for these people.<br />

are<br />

vocational rehabilitation services are 8ften not<br />

However,<br />

to these people. The indications are that in the fiscal<br />

available<br />

1968, only 181 of these people were offered vocational rehab-<br />

year<br />

services at the time of discharge. This means that more<br />

ilitation<br />

3,200 of these recovered mentally ill people returning to the<br />

than<br />

were not offered any services.<br />

community<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

should be an expansion of serviees to the hospitalized<br />

There<br />

ill so that by 1975 all patients below the age of<br />

mentally<br />

would be referred to vocational rehabilitation routinely,<br />

60<br />

later screening to exclude those not feasible for<br />

with<br />

vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

entire concept of mental illness and mental retardation<br />

The<br />

being scrutinized. A number of people in the health professions<br />

is<br />

critical of the present situation. We have titles in our books<br />

are<br />

as: THE DISCONTENT EXPLOSION IN MENTAL HEALTH, THE REFORM OF<br />

such<br />

HOSPITALS, and THE CRIME OF COMMITMENT. Seymour Halleck, a<br />

MENTAL<br />

who is Chief of Psychiatric Services for the Wisconsin<br />

physician<br />

of Corrections, wrote.in the March 1969 issue of PSYCHOLOGY<br />

Division<br />

about "The Reform of Mental Hospitals." The article said in<br />

TODAY,<br />

part:<br />

system of committing mental patients to hospitals for<br />

Our<br />

against their will has many drawbacks. But I<br />

treatment<br />

not thereforeTthink the system should be abolished.<br />

do<br />

I think we should concentrate on radical reforms.<br />

Rather<br />

I am convinced these reforms are necessary. In-<br />

And<br />

commitments are unjustifiably frequent today<br />

voluntary<br />

of two false beliefs. Too many believe that the<br />

because<br />

disturbed are more dangerous than normal per-<br />

emotionally<br />

despite repeated statistical evidence to the con-<br />

sons,<br />

Thousands of patients in mental hospitals probably<br />

trary.<br />

could be released without harm to themselves or others.<br />

common misconception is that mental illness re-<br />

Another<br />

long-termhospitalization. This false belief<br />

quires<br />

allows us to tolerate many hospitals that provide primarily<br />

192


care. Thousands in our mental hospitals would<br />

custodial<br />

have to be there if they could receive adequate treat-<br />

not<br />

ment.<br />

society is faced with decision involving control<br />

Whenever<br />

the. insane offender, the mentally incompetent, the drug<br />

of<br />

the sex offender or the mentally ill, it must base<br />

addict,<br />

decision upon social principles or values. Unfortu-<br />

its<br />

our society has been tentative and inconsistent<br />

nately,<br />

defining its values. Punishment is often valued as<br />

in<br />

as rehabilitation. Protecting the status quo of our<br />

muck<br />

mental-hospital system often comes'before protec-<br />

present<br />

emotionally disturbed citizen. Reform would<br />

tingthe<br />

faster if we could consistently adhere to realistic<br />

come<br />

We must developlaws and practices that protect<br />

values.<br />

but at the same time. we must abandon our impulse<br />

society,<br />

punish or neglect the emotionally disturbed. We must<br />

to<br />

for treatment that will return them to society in<br />

search<br />

the shortest possible time.<br />

even more radical recommendation has come from Thomas<br />

An<br />

a professor of Psychiatry at the State University of New<br />

Szasz,<br />

Upstate Medical Center in Syracuse. Dr. Szasz, also writing<br />

York,<br />

PSYCHOLOGY TODAY, stated:<br />

in<br />

and laymen .alike generally believe persons<br />

Physicians<br />

involuntarily confined in mental hospitals because<br />

are<br />

are mentally ill, but don't know they are sick and<br />

they<br />

medical treatment. This view, to put it charitably,<br />

need<br />

nonsense. In my opinion, mental illness is a myth.<br />

is<br />

we label "mentally ill" are not sick, and invol-<br />

People<br />

mental hospitalization is not treatment. It is<br />

untary<br />

punishment.<br />

kinds of therapy once considered so effective in mental<br />

The<br />

are now questioned. It is believed by many professionals<br />

hospitals<br />

a long £erm of person,to-person psychotherapy is hurtful rather<br />

that<br />

helpful to the patient.<br />

than<br />

Hersch in AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, for July 1968,<br />

Charles<br />

DiscoNtent Explosion in Mental Health" wrote as follows:<br />

"The<br />

of the most important sources of discontent was in<br />

One<br />

failure of the mental health movement to deal effect-<br />

the<br />

with many of the problems about which society was<br />

ively<br />

concerned. This is not meant to single out the<br />

most<br />

health professions for special criticism. Their<br />

mental<br />

including those of omission, were shared by the<br />

failures,<br />

professions and organizations as well. But in the<br />

other<br />

of psychiatry, we promised ourselves and society too<br />

age<br />

and we are living now in the aftermath of that<br />

much,<br />

disappointment.<br />

193


the child guidance field, the sociopathic deviations<br />

In<br />

particularly resistant to professional attention.<br />

were<br />

there had been a long history of clinical and<br />

Although<br />

involvement with the problems of delinquency,<br />

research<br />

approaches remained ineffective, and even<br />

traditional<br />

projects, such as the Cambridge-Somerville<br />

large-scale<br />

(Powers & Witmer, 1951), could not produce satis-<br />

Study<br />

results. Efforts in.delinquency prevention and<br />

factory<br />

the treatment of the individual delinquent met with<br />

in<br />

frustration.<br />

repeated<br />

families represented another refractory<br />

Multiproblem<br />

Indeed, their very imperviousness to inter-<br />

group.<br />

came to be considered in some quarters as a<br />

vention<br />

criterion. Many psychiatric disorders were<br />

defining<br />

among their impairments, and the children tended<br />

included<br />

be sufficiently disabled, both emotionally and educa-<br />

to<br />

so as to perpetuate their multiproblem status<br />

tionally,<br />

the next generation. Typically these families were a<br />

in<br />

to the community as well as to themselves. How-<br />

burden<br />

persistent attempts to work with them in. an ortho-<br />

ever,<br />

dox framework found little success.<br />

a need for the treatment of the mentally ill is<br />

Probably<br />

focus on a public health model of operation where prevention is<br />

to<br />

important than therapy. Employment at suitable work is more<br />

more<br />

than most pills, or other traditional therapies. Brief<br />

important<br />

is better than long-term hospitalization. The<br />

hospitalization<br />

worker would be better off to record an employment history<br />

social<br />

than to record the pathology leading to the hospitalization.<br />

treatment method is best exemplified in the United<br />

This<br />

by the Fort Logan StateHospital in the suburbs of Denver,<br />

States<br />

Vocational rehabilitation plays one of the most important<br />

Colorado.<br />

in that hospital.<br />

roles<br />

the State of Washington has three state<br />

Fortunately,<br />

that are relativelY well financed, properly staffed, and<br />

hospitals<br />

operated, and an active research program exists. It would<br />

humanely<br />

particularly easy to work with the superintendents of the three<br />

be<br />

hospitals Eastern Washington State Hospital, Western Wash-<br />

state<br />

State Hospital, and Northern Washington State Hospital--- to<br />

ington<br />

rehabilitation services. Vocational rehabilitation services<br />

provide<br />

be provided in this setting through "third party" funds without<br />

can<br />

state or local expenditures. Money appropriated by the<br />

additional<br />

of Washington's Departmentof Institutions is matched by<br />

state<br />

funds at a ratio of five federal dollars for each state<br />

federal<br />

No additional state funds are required. It is assumed that<br />

dollar.<br />

1975 there will be an enormous expansion of vocational rehabili-<br />

by<br />

services i the three state hospitals. It is also assumed<br />

tation<br />

that different delivery systems of services to the mentally ill will<br />

194


utilized increasingly. Patients will be served in mental hygiene<br />

be<br />

so that the need for in-hospital services will be drastically<br />

clinics<br />

reduced.<br />

state funds are derived from appropriations.made specifically<br />

Most<br />

vocational rehabilitation. Thereare, however, other important<br />

for<br />

Public funds may be made available by transfer between<br />

sources.<br />

agencies or by accounting for indirect costs to the state<br />

state<br />

such as those for space, retirement, etc. A term often used<br />

program<br />

"Third-Party Funds," which means that the state share of the cost<br />

is<br />

serving handicapped individuals under the state plan is borne in<br />

of<br />

by a state or local public agency other than the designated<br />

part<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation agency. A "third-party" joins the<br />

State<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation agency and the Federal Government<br />

State<br />

the funding arrangement. The "third-party" agency actually obli-<br />

in<br />

and disburses the funds, but it does this under the supervision<br />

gates<br />

control of the State Vocational Rehabilitation agency. Third-<br />

and<br />

funding has become increasingly popular since it increases the<br />

party<br />

available for vocational rehabilitation and provides more flex-<br />

funds<br />

financing and fiscal administration. Of far greater importance<br />

ible<br />

the fact that such cooperative undertakings open up new program<br />

is<br />

for reaching disabled people, introduce new services, and<br />

avenues<br />

a continuum of services among programs administered by<br />

provide<br />

state agencies.<br />

separate<br />

Rehabilitation servicesin Washington State con-<br />

Vocational<br />

to be managed by the Coordinating Council for Occupational Edu-<br />

tinue<br />

It may have "third party" funds increased. There is always<br />

cation.<br />

question about what proportion of the rehabilitation dollar should<br />

a<br />

be tied up in "third party" funds<br />

source of state matching funds is expected to<br />

Another<br />

substantial in the next few years. This is local public<br />

become<br />

private money made available.to the state vocational rehabili-<br />

or<br />

agency by a political subdivision of a state to augment<br />

tation<br />

rehabilitation services in that area. Using this pro-<br />

vocational<br />

made possible by the 1965 amendments, 38 states have developed<br />

cedure,<br />

sorts of joint programs with public and private agencies as well<br />

all<br />

increased resources and services for the vocational rehabilitation<br />

as<br />

handicapped people. It is an excellent mechanism for use in<br />

of<br />

projects" and for other target groups such as the rural poor,<br />

"city<br />

juvenile delinquents, public assistance recipients, etc.<br />

alcoholics,<br />

may also be used for establishing facilities and workshops.<br />

It<br />

195


Mental Retardation Planning<br />

1964 the U. S. Public Health Service provided the State<br />

In<br />

Washington with a grant for $30,000 for a study of mental health.<br />

of<br />

grant was provided through the leadership of the Washington State<br />

This<br />

of Institutions. In October 1963 the then Governor Albert<br />

Department<br />

appointed twelve members to the Mental Health Planning<br />

Rosellini<br />

In February 1964, with the knowledge that Washington State<br />

Committee.<br />

have available planning money for mental retardation, the Committee<br />

would<br />

expanded to include three representatives who had a special interest<br />

was<br />

services for the mentally retarded. At that time the Committee was<br />

in<br />

the Governors Committee on Mental Health and Mental Retarda-<br />

renamed<br />

The planning effort was concluded at the end of 1965. The com-<br />

tion.<br />

report of findings was distributed during 1966, as a book<br />

prehensive<br />

EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN SUMMARY OF WASHINGTON'S COMPREHENSIVE<br />

entitled<br />

TO HELP THE MENTALLY RETARDED. The chairman of this Committee<br />

PLAN<br />

was Charles R. Strother, Ph.D., of the University of Washington.<br />

State of Washington has profited from the contributions<br />

The<br />

two of its citizens who are world famous for their work with<br />

from<br />

retardation. One of them is Dr. Strother and the other is the<br />

.mental<br />

Dr. Edgar A. Doll of Bellingham. In addition.there is in Seattle<br />

late<br />

part of the University of Washington a Child Development Center<br />

as<br />

does superlative work in the field of retardation and the prepara-<br />

which<br />

of individuals for careers in the field of Psychology, education,<br />

tion<br />

genetics, social work, and vocational rehabilitation. This<br />

pediatrics,<br />

institution has earned its great reputation.<br />

Commission, too, has benefited from the services of<br />

The<br />

Strother, Dr. Alice, Hayden, Dr. Norris Haring, and others of the<br />

Dr.<br />

of the Child Development Center. Many of the techniques devel-<br />

staff<br />

by Dr. Strother and his Committee were utilized by our task<br />

oped<br />

Relevant parts of EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN were provided the task<br />

forces.<br />

of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation to aid<br />

forces<br />

them in their deliberations.<br />

is interesting to look at the recommendations made in<br />

It<br />

by the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Planning Committee<br />

1965<br />

order to see how these recommendations have fared in the inter-<br />

in<br />

years. One of theirrecommendations is quoted below:<br />

vening<br />

supervised employment programs and sheltered workshops<br />

That<br />

the employment and training of the mentally retarded<br />

for<br />

be extended and expanded.<br />

This certainly is being done. Two other recommendations follow:<br />

a study be made of the organizational structure and<br />

That<br />

of operation of workshops based on the experi-<br />

standards<br />

ences of such operations within the state.<br />

196


guidelines for operations be developed and made avail-<br />

That<br />

to existing workshops and for all other groups of<br />

able<br />

within the various communities of the state<br />

individuals<br />

have an identified interest in the initiation of work<br />

who<br />

opportunity programs for the mentally retarded.<br />

were achieved in 1968 following major effort by thel staff of<br />

These<br />

Rehabilitation. Four professional people on the staff of<br />

Vocational<br />

Rehabilitation in the State of Washington are concerned<br />

Vocational<br />

with the workshop program. They made a major study of<br />

principally<br />

program in 1968 and developed guidelines for action. These guide-<br />

this<br />

and a workshop manual were approved by the Coordinating Council<br />

lines<br />

Occupational Education in 1968. There is every reason to believe<br />

for<br />

the professional consultation services provided by Vocational<br />

that<br />

to sheltered supervised work opportunity programs are<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

to those of any. other state.<br />

equal<br />

Another recommendation stated:<br />

a policy on employment be developed within state<br />

That<br />

which will allow-for and expedite the selective<br />

government<br />

of the mentally retarded in state jobs on a<br />

placement<br />

plan as that initiated by Federal Civil Service.<br />

similar<br />

recommendation has not been followed at this time. Legislation<br />

This<br />

needed to alter the State Civil Service System. It is likely that<br />

is<br />

such legislation will be introduced this year or the next.<br />

Two other recommendations are quoted in full:<br />

evaluation, social, and prevocational training begin<br />

That<br />

the school years with transition machinery developed so<br />

in<br />

before the retarded child "graduates" from school<br />

that<br />

education), the community is aware of his poten-<br />

(special<br />

and limitations and is actually preparing to help<br />

tial<br />

move along to the next steps in this transitional<br />

him<br />

period.<br />

the cooperative program between the Tacoma School<br />

That<br />

and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

District<br />

be extended to school districts throughout the<br />

should<br />

of Washington, and that provisions in budgets be<br />

State<br />

to take advantage of available federal funds to<br />

made<br />

cooperative programs.<br />

establish<br />

cooperative school program is described earlier in this<br />

The<br />

in a statement prepared by Donald Hamilton of the Division<br />

chapter<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation. This rapidly expanding program still<br />

of<br />

only about one-tenth of the students in special education<br />

encompasses<br />

in the secondary level of the public schools. Greater expan-<br />

programs<br />

is likely in the future even as special, education programs<br />

sion<br />

197


are being expanded throughout the state, The need remains<br />

themselves<br />

T1e services that are heing provided for the favored school<br />

great,<br />

have been widely acclaimed and the program is recognized<br />

districts<br />

a good one. Each student enrolled in a special education class is<br />

as<br />

Most of them are young people who, with proper training,<br />

handicapped.<br />

be made employable. The benefits of services-to these handicapped<br />

can<br />

are readily apparent. They face a life of dependency or<br />

youngsters<br />

face a life of self-sufficiency, self-support and productivity.<br />

they<br />

Another recommendation from EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN is quoted:<br />

field staff of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

to be increased to provide necessary services to the<br />

needs<br />

mentally retarded.<br />

is also being done at the present time. Approximately one-third<br />

This<br />

the counselors of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation were<br />

of<br />

employed in 1968. As the state budget for Vocational Rehabili-<br />

newly<br />

is to be increased by approximately 84 percent in the next<br />

tation<br />

it is likely that there will be continued major increases<br />

biennium<br />

the field staff. Presumably,.the staff will be able to work with<br />

in<br />

handicapped and disadvantaged individuals. It is likely there<br />

more<br />

that the number of mental retardated being provided services<br />

fore<br />

will increase at the same rate.<br />

October 1968 the Washington Association for Retarded<br />

In<br />

made a number of recommendations to the 1969 Legislature,<br />

Children<br />

officials and departments of government, and to citizens of the<br />

to<br />

of Washington. Some of these recommendations were identical<br />

State<br />

those in the 1965 report, EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN, quoted above. A<br />

to<br />

of new ones, however, reflect the improvement in services to<br />

number<br />

mentally retarded which has occurred at both the state and local<br />

the<br />

in the last four years. For example, their recommendation No. ii<br />

level<br />

county mental retardation boards. Such boards did not even<br />

mentions<br />

the time of the writing of EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN. This is an<br />

existat<br />

Therecommendation below appeared in the WARC Newsletter,<br />

improvement.<br />

FOR RETARDED CHILDREN, for October 1968:<br />

HOPE<br />

emphasis should be given to establishing closer<br />

More<br />

on rehabilitation services with County MR<br />

relationship<br />

i.e., acquainting the public concerning the<br />

Boards,<br />

of the retarded for employment in busi-<br />

qualifications<br />

industry, extended services, sheltered workshops,<br />

ness,<br />

etc.<br />

improvement is that involved with the services of<br />

Another<br />

Department of Institutions. This Department has both community-<br />

the<br />

programs and residential treatment facilities for the mentally<br />

based<br />

The programs have been funded at far higher levels than<br />

retarded.<br />

and the over-all programs are obviously superior to the ones<br />

before<br />

recently as four years ago. The 1969 Legislature is considering<br />

as<br />

198


ecommendations of the Central Budget Agency that the budget for<br />

the<br />

state schools for the retarded and the Epton Funds for county<br />

the<br />

mental retardation services be substantially increased.<br />

recommendation made by the WARC last fall, but not yet<br />

One<br />

is as follows:<br />

implemented<br />

departments and agencies,of local and state government<br />

That<br />

encouraged to adopt policies which will allow for and<br />

be<br />

the selective placement of the mentally retarded<br />

expedite<br />

jobs on a plan similar to that initiated and so success<br />

in<br />

fully carried out by Federal Civil Service.<br />

1968 Dr. Newton Buker, a specialist in special education<br />

In<br />

the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State<br />

in<br />

Washington prepared a survey. Partsof it are relevant to voca-<br />

of<br />

rehabilitation services for the handicapped. Sections of this<br />

tional<br />

report are reproduced as follows:<br />

PREFACE<br />

education of handicapped children does not start at age<br />

The<br />

and stop at the completion of the eighth grade. The<br />

six<br />

schools have accepted a major responsibility for<br />

public<br />

these young people of high school age with experi-<br />

providing<br />

mnd training which will prepare them to be capable,<br />

ences<br />

citizens.<br />

self-supporting<br />

bulletin investigates the present status of secondary<br />

This<br />

education--particularly as it exists for the student<br />

special<br />

who is academically limited-in the State of Washington.<br />

Bruno<br />

Louis<br />

Superintendent<br />

State<br />

of Public Instruction<br />

the fall, 1967, meeting of the Washington Association of<br />

At<br />

of Special Education, a committee of members<br />

Administrators<br />

appointed to establish guidelines for secondary special<br />

was<br />

programs. This committee agreed that one of the<br />

education<br />

tasks would be to determine present and proposed dis-<br />

first<br />

programs and needs. As a result, in January, 1968.<br />

trict<br />

survey of Washington's public schools was undertaken by<br />

a<br />

State Office of Public Instruction. All Ii0 districts<br />

the<br />

currently operate programs which for children<br />

handicapped<br />

returned the survey questionnaire, State<br />

completedand<br />

institutions were not included in this report.<br />

199


Junior Hish<br />

I. PRESENT STATUS<br />

summary of the returns is presented i Table I. As of<br />

A<br />

1968, 81% of the 85 districts with junior high<br />

January,<br />

(or schools with equivalent age-groupings) in<br />

schools<br />

were serving-areas for reimbursed special educa-<br />

Washington<br />

programs. Of the 129,878 junior high school students<br />

tion<br />

3,540 (2.7%) were reported as handicapped.<br />

reported,<br />

Hish<br />

Senior<br />

the 249 high school districts in the state in January,<br />

Of<br />

61 (or 24%) were serving districts for state reim-<br />

1968,<br />

special education programs. In these districts,<br />

bursed<br />

(1.7%) of the 131,728 high school students were<br />

2,275<br />

as handicapped.<br />

listed<br />

Programs<br />

purposes of analyzing program offerings, the schools<br />

For<br />

the present study were asked to report the approximate<br />

in<br />

number of students who were scheduled into various subjects.<br />

Work-Study Pr_0$r ams<br />

programs are those in which students are given<br />

Work-study<br />

job experiences during school hours. A common<br />

supervised<br />

which has evolved is for tenth grade handicapped<br />

pattern<br />

to be given about two hours of around school work<br />

students<br />

janitorial, library service, teacher assistant,<br />

(kitchen,<br />

garage, etc.), with the majority of his day spent in<br />

bus<br />

home room or contact classes. Eleventh graders may<br />

special<br />

in classes (special home room or contact) for half of<br />

be<br />

day, and then in varied, sample, community work experi-<br />

the<br />

supervised by special teachers. Senior students may<br />

ences<br />

one or two long-term community work experiences which<br />

have<br />

lead to full-time work placement following graduation.<br />

may<br />

on the subject notes that there are, of course,<br />

Literature<br />

variations of this procedure.<br />

many<br />

opportunities were provided to 37%. of the students<br />

Workstudy<br />

41 of the 61 districts who reported high. school special<br />

in<br />

education progr&ms,<br />

200


DVR Three-Party Agre_ements<br />

agreements are a means for cooperative action<br />

Three-party<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the<br />

between<br />

of Public Instruction to assist local school dis-<br />

Office<br />

in providing qualified handicapped high school<br />

tricts<br />

with rehabilitation services, including counseling,<br />

students<br />

and/or psychological attention, job experience and<br />

physical<br />

job placement, and extended vocational follow-up.<br />

this time, seven school districts in Washington are<br />

At<br />

with three-party agreements: five "large" (Tacoma,<br />

involved<br />

Vancouver, Edmonds, and Federal Way) and two<br />

Spokane,<br />

(Auburn and Yakima).<br />

"medium":<br />

548 students now receive DVR services in the seven<br />

Some<br />

who participate.<br />

districts<br />

of the main thrusts of these DVR services is in pro-<br />

One<br />

supervised work-experience opportunities and work<br />

viding<br />

for handicapped students. Fifty-twopercent<br />

placement<br />

all handicapped students now involved in a type of<br />

of<br />

are clients of DVR: seventy-two percent in<br />

work-study<br />

large districts and seventeen percent in the medium<br />

the<br />

At this time, none of the twenty-three "small"<br />

districts.<br />

who reported high school handicapped children is<br />

districts<br />

involved in DVR three-party services.<br />

Reporting Needs for More Understanding of,<br />

Schools<br />

Involvement with, Local Agencies<br />

and<br />

Asencies. Schools<br />

21<br />

Unions<br />

19<br />

VocationalRehabilitation<br />

12<br />

Labor/Industries<br />

Security 11<br />

Employment<br />

. 9<br />

Other<br />

8<br />

Welfare<br />

Health Office 7<br />

(End of excerpts from Dr. Buker's srvey report)<br />

Kemp describes formal education as viewed by the<br />

Barbara<br />

handicapped student in a 1966 work, THE YOUTH WE<br />

socioeconomically<br />

HAVEN'T SERVED A CHALLENGE TO VOCATIONAL EDUCATION, in these words:<br />

201


the way In of summary, then, how do the students view<br />

a<br />

and education? It is important to consider and<br />

school<br />

their attitudes before attempting to change<br />

understand<br />

Their educational experience, as they see and<br />

them.<br />

interpret it, is as follows:<br />

The school day is long and tedious.<br />

education they are receiving seems to lack<br />

The<br />

to their future life and needs.<br />

relevance<br />

school system often fails to recognize and<br />

The<br />

their culturally different backgrounds.<br />

respect<br />

teachers lack an understanding of their special<br />

Some<br />

and problems, or ignore them.<br />

needs<br />

or no special instruction and attention are<br />

Little<br />

which might help them fit into the regular<br />

provided<br />

school programs.<br />

much school time, in their view, is spent on<br />

Too<br />

staff members are occasionally involved<br />

discipline;<br />

physical conflict with the students. Such behavior<br />

in<br />

the part of adults is already too frequent a part<br />

on<br />

of these youngsters lives.<br />

think they are not given the type of counseling,<br />

They<br />

or other support they need to enter the<br />

encouragement,<br />

of work, and sothey leave school unprepared for<br />

world<br />

job. When they encounter discrimination or failure<br />

a<br />

job seeking because of their age, race, or poor<br />

in<br />

background, they do not believe that a<br />

educational<br />

return to school will improve their situation.<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation services can help these students.<br />

Th__e Regional Medical ,,Program<br />

Washington-Alaska Regional Medical Program is associated<br />

The<br />

the University of Washington in Seattle. The Director is Donal<br />

with<br />

Sparkman, M.D., a member of the Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

Ro<br />

and previously the medical director of the Division of<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Rehabilitation. Dr. Sparkman also serves on the Program<br />

Vocational<br />

Group for Comprehensive Health Services. This regional<br />

Management<br />

program has staff members and volunteers who are concerned with<br />

medical<br />

topics. One concerns the need for stroke rehabilitation beds.<br />

specific<br />

report was prepared by Justus F. Lehmann, M.D., Director of the<br />

A<br />

Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University of Washing-<br />

Physical<br />

ton Medical School, Seattle. This report dated July 30, 1968, follows:<br />

202


SEATTLE AREA STROKE PATIENT BED NEED<br />

order to assist the Regional Medical Program Stroke Sub-<br />

In<br />

in the planning of rehabilitation services and facilities<br />

committee<br />

stroke patients throughout the region, the following data have<br />

for<br />

compiled.<br />

been<br />

Prevalence of Stroke<br />

Seattle Area Chronic Care Patients (60% Survival)<br />

Minimum MaXimum BedsRequired<br />

Population 951 1584 48-80<br />

Current<br />

Population<br />

Projected<br />

1972 1081 1802 55-91<br />

breakdown by age group of persons who have been disabled by stroke<br />

A<br />

as follows:<br />

is<br />

Morbidity of Stroke<br />

Age Group Rate per i000 Stroke Patients<br />

.4<br />

45<br />

7.4<br />

45-65<br />

65+ 36.4<br />

activity limitations will exist for all ages. The per cent<br />

Some<br />

patients reporting CVA as a chronic condition and having that cQn-<br />

of<br />

dition cause activity limitations is as follows:<br />

Estimated Need for Beds<br />

67.1%<br />

45<br />

65.2%<br />

45-65<br />

Percent with Activity Limitation<br />

65+ 70.4%<br />

assess the need for stroke beds, one must take into consideration<br />

To<br />

total number of rehabilitation beds available, since these beds would<br />

the<br />

the stroke patients as well as the general population of the dis-<br />

serve<br />

It must also be recognized that only a portion of the stroke<br />

abled.<br />

will need inpatient rehabilitationand in turn the services<br />

patients<br />

in these facilities to an individual patient would rarely<br />

rendered<br />

beyond four weeks. (The average stay ofa selected group of<br />

extend<br />

patients with severe involvement was approximately 30 days.)<br />

stroke<br />

203


appears that the maximal allotment of one rehabilitation bed<br />

It<br />

2000 population under the Hill-Burton Hospital Construction program<br />

per<br />

too high if applied to rehabilitation beds in facilities which provide<br />

is<br />

rehabilitation. This is taken from a report prepared by<br />

comprehensive<br />

F. J. Kottke, M.D., Director of the Rehabilitation Research and<br />

Dr.<br />

Center at the University of Minnesota Medical. School, in a<br />

Training<br />

prepared for the Cleveland Health Goals Project. A realistic<br />

report<br />

of the number of rehabilitation beds needed in facilities<br />

estimate<br />

provide intensive and comprehensive rehabilitation services<br />

which<br />

be approximately one rehabilitation bed per 5000 population to<br />

would<br />

meet the demand for this type of care.<br />

this formula the present and projected need for rehabilitation<br />

Using<br />

for the Seattle area would be:<br />

beds<br />

Population Beds Needed<br />

1,056,000 211<br />

1968<br />

1,201,300 (Projective) 240<br />

1972<br />

following table gives the present and projected rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

for the Seattle area:<br />

beds<br />

of Beds<br />

Number<br />

1968<br />

Hoital<br />

25 31<br />

University<br />

20 34.<br />

Harborview<br />

Orthopedic 0 20<br />

Childrens'<br />

Administration 12 12<br />

Veterans<br />

Health Service 12 20<br />

Public<br />

12 up to57<br />

Providence<br />

Northwest<br />

Swedish<br />

TOTAL 81 174<br />

Number of Beds<br />

Projected<br />

1972<br />

University of Washington Hospital, Department of Physical<br />

Source:<br />

andRehabilitation Expansion Plan Records.<br />

Medicine<br />

Distribution of Facilities<br />

a study done by Basil J. F. Mott for the.publication Financing<br />

In<br />

OperatingRehabilitationCentersandFacilities, the patient load<br />

and<br />

related to the distance in miles that the patient resides from the<br />

is<br />

center. This obviously has major implications with<br />

rehabilitation<br />

to the planning of such facilities. The following table illus-<br />

regard<br />

this point.<br />

trates<br />

204


Distribution of Patients by<br />

Percent<br />

of Patients' Permanent Residences<br />

Distance<br />

From Center as of the Study Period<br />

All<br />

patients Cen- Inpatient Outpatient<br />

Miles<br />

from ters centers centers.<br />

residences<br />

center<br />

Per- Per- Range<br />

cent cent among cen-<br />

Percent<br />

Range<br />

cen-<br />

among<br />

(per- ters (per-<br />

ters<br />

.. ...cent). cent)<br />

...<br />

Total iO0• i00 i00<br />

15 miles<br />

Under<br />

to 24<br />

15<br />

to 49<br />

25<br />

to 99<br />

50<br />

to 250<br />

i00<br />

250<br />

Over<br />

68<br />

5<br />

5<br />

4<br />

9<br />

9<br />

38<br />

4<br />

7<br />

22<br />

21<br />

14-83<br />

10-19<br />

12-20<br />

2-23<br />

0-39<br />

0-41<br />

88<br />

6<br />

3<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

58-96<br />

•2-22<br />

1-8<br />

0-4<br />

6 0-<br />

2 0-<br />

United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare:<br />

Source:<br />

Planning of Facilities for Rehabilitation Services,<br />

Areawide<br />

Washington, D. C.., April, 1963.<br />

purposes, the Washington State Department of Health<br />

.Forplanning<br />

a service area for rehabilitation facility as being 40 miles or<br />

considers<br />

one hour's driving time.<br />

(End of statement prepared by Justus F. Lehmann, M.D.)<br />

205


Comprehensive Health Planning<br />

Federal Public Health Service Act was amended in 1966.<br />

The<br />

amendments are known as Public Law 89-749. One section provides<br />

These<br />

the extension and improvement of Comprehensive Health Planning<br />

for<br />

Public Health Services, to provide for a more'effective use of<br />

and<br />

funds for such planning and services, and for other purposes.<br />

available<br />

provides for the establishment of a State Health Planning Council<br />

It<br />

includes representatives of stateand local agencies and non-<br />

which<br />

organizations and a majority of consumer representation.<br />

governmental<br />

members of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Staff<br />

been involved with the comprehensive health planning from the time<br />

have<br />

Daniel J. Evans designated the Planning and Community Affairs<br />

Governor<br />

to accept federal funds for this project. The chairman and the<br />

Agency<br />

director of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilita-<br />

project<br />

have been from the beginning members of the Program Management<br />

tion<br />

of Comprehensive Health Planning. The vice-chairman of the<br />

Group<br />

Commission has served as a member of the State Health Planning<br />

Planning<br />

and was recently reappointed to this role. A fourth involve-<br />

Council<br />

is that of Donal R. Sparkman, M.D., who is both a member of the<br />

ment<br />

Management Group of the Comprehensive State Health Planning<br />

Program<br />

a member of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

and<br />

objective of this law is to encourage cooperative<br />

Another<br />

among governmental and non-governmental organizations and<br />

efforts<br />

agencies in education, welfare, and rehabilitation. A national<br />

similar<br />

announced by President Lyndon B. Johnson calls for "good health<br />

goal<br />

every citizen to the limits of our country's capacity to provide<br />

for<br />

it."<br />

are assuming that health is a human right. Two corollaries<br />

We<br />

this become self-evident: One, that every person should have ready<br />

of<br />

to high quality personal health services; two, that every person<br />

access<br />

live in an environment which is safe from preventable hazard<br />

should<br />

and conducive to healthful and productive living.<br />

Government Reorganization<br />

October 1965, a study by the Council for Reorganization<br />

In<br />

Washington State Government reported detailed evaluations of 37<br />

of<br />

departments, agencies, commissions, and boards of the executive<br />

major<br />

of government of the State of Washington. Vocational rehabili-<br />

branch<br />

services were not given much attention in the Council's printed<br />

tation<br />

report.<br />

November 1968, a second report by a task force on execu-<br />

In<br />

organization which had been appointed earlier in 1968 by Governor<br />

tive<br />

J. Evans, was published. The chairman for this study was<br />

Daniel<br />

C. Denny, Dean of the Graduate School of Public Affairs,<br />

Brewster<br />

206


of Washington. This bipartisan group invited a number of<br />

University<br />

officials to testify. This task force reported as follows:<br />

governmental<br />

government today faces a crisis. Every year, the<br />

State<br />

played by government in our lives becomes more impor-<br />

role<br />

Relations between the chief executive and those who<br />

tant.<br />

with him continually grow more complex. An expanding<br />

work<br />

bureaucracy increasingly impinges on areas once<br />

federal<br />

the primary responsibility of the state. Govern-<br />

thought<br />

machinery that functioned well enough in a simpler<br />

mental<br />

is no more adequate to cope with today's complex<br />

time<br />

problems than is an abacus in the age of the computer.<br />

Task Force has sought in its study of the structure of<br />

This<br />

government to identify specific problems impeding the<br />

state<br />

of the executive branch of state government to meet<br />

capacity<br />

expanding and changing responsibilities and to propose<br />

its<br />

solutions which can be promptly implemented.<br />

One of their recommendations was.to:<br />

the Department of Employment Security, the<br />

Consolidate<br />

of Labor and Industries and the Division of<br />

Department<br />

Rehabilitation of the Coordinating Council for<br />

Vocational<br />

Education into a Department of Manpower and<br />

Occupational<br />

Industry<br />

In another part of their report they wrote as follows:<br />

can be argued with some justification that the Vocational<br />

It<br />

should be placed within the Department of<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

and Health Services. Our rationale for including<br />

Social<br />

Rehabilitation inthe Department of Manpower and<br />

Vocational<br />

is that rehabilitation is a "manpower" function<br />

Industry.<br />

that its goal is to restore people to productive roles<br />

in<br />

society. Actually, Vocational Rehabilitation stands<br />

in<br />

in the center between a health-welfare and a man-<br />

somewhat<br />

service, ls treatment methods are closely allied<br />

power<br />

the health and social work fields, its end result with<br />

with<br />

Therefore, it could probably go with equal but<br />

employment.<br />

logic to either the Department of Social and Health<br />

different<br />

or to the Department of Manpower and Industry.<br />

Services<br />

approval willbe required for the consolidation being<br />

Federal<br />

here, but preliminary inquiry indicated that such<br />

proposed<br />

can be obtained.<br />

approval<br />

1969 State Legislature rejected bills which would have<br />

The<br />

reorganization recommended by the task force. The Voca-<br />

effectedthe<br />

Rehabilitation program, at least until another session of the<br />

tional<br />

remains under the Coordinating Council for Occupational<br />

Legislature,<br />

Education.<br />

207


Administrative Aspects<br />

Pub lic relations<br />

W. Gardner, in a statement written when he was Secretary<br />

John<br />

the U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and published<br />

of<br />

in NO EASY VICTORIES in 1968, discussed leadership in this way:<br />

have a significant role. in creating the state of<br />

Leaders<br />

that isthe society. They can serve as symbols of the<br />

mind<br />

unity of the society. They can express the values<br />

moral<br />

hold the society together. Most important, they can<br />

that<br />

and articulate goals that lift people out of their<br />

conceive<br />

preoccupations, carry them above the conflicts that<br />

petty<br />

a society apart, and unite them in the pursuit of<br />

tear<br />

worthy of their best efforts.<br />

objectives<br />

money available for rehabilitation services and the staff<br />

The<br />

to administer those services in this and every other state<br />

provided<br />

been inadequate to meet the tremendous demand of rehabilitating<br />

has<br />

individuals. When services were provided well, counselors<br />

handicapped<br />

more referrals than they could handle. Formal public rela-<br />

.received<br />

programs were not considered necessary. As. Vocational Rehabili-<br />

tions<br />

in the State of Washington has grown in size and stature, the<br />

tation<br />

on it have gone up far faster.<br />

demands<br />

the period of work of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />

In<br />

Rehabilitation there were very few stories in the newspapers<br />

tional<br />

the state about Vocational Rehabilitation. Almost all the stories<br />

of<br />

were the result of local effort rather than efforts of the<br />

printed<br />

Officer of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. If<br />

Information<br />

stories had been published praising the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

more<br />

and indicating that services were available to handicapped<br />

program<br />

then the result may have been greater disappointment to more<br />

people,<br />

applicants.<br />

attention could have been called during Fiscal<br />

Certainly<br />

1969 to the plight of the Vocational Rehabilitation agency.<br />

Year<br />

after only five months of services in the fiscal year,<br />

Essentially,<br />

budget reduction made at the Federal level devastated the agency.<br />

a<br />

additional client services could be authorized, with a few exceptions,<br />

No<br />

the remaining seven months of the fiscal year. This meant that<br />

for<br />

the period December I, 1968 through the end of June, 1969, clients<br />

from<br />

for Vocational Rehabilitation services were necessarily told<br />

referred<br />

services would be postponed. There was little money even for<br />

that<br />

care to help determine if a client might be eligible for<br />

diagnostic<br />

services.<br />

the consternation of the staff members, the effect<br />

Despite<br />

the cut on morale, and on the pipeline of referrals and services,<br />

of<br />

attention outside the agency was sought. Not a single press<br />

no<br />

was prepared explaining the facts to the public. The Legis-<br />

release<br />

was not even informed of the havoc caused by the Federal cutback<br />

lature<br />

the middle of a-fiscal year. A Pollyanna attitude was the only<br />

during<br />

one presented to the public.<br />

208


editorial by the State Director, E. M. Oliver, in the<br />

An<br />

issue, 1968, of the Vocational Rehabilitation OUTLOOK, is quoted<br />

winter<br />

in full, as follows:<br />

than $7.5 million will be added to earned personal<br />

More<br />

in Washington State in 1968 as result of handi-<br />

incomes<br />

individuals becoming self-supporting through the<br />

capped<br />

of the State Divisionof Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

programs<br />

than 4,500 persons, including dependents of the handi-<br />

More<br />

benefited directly from the Division's services.<br />

capped,<br />

attention is focused on the efficiency and productivity<br />

While<br />

handicapped employees, the public also should be aware<br />

of<br />

the significance of its investment in the rehabilitation<br />

of<br />

individuals with physical, mental, vocational and other<br />

of<br />

handicaps.<br />

of the rehabilitated in fiscal year 1968 increased<br />

Incomes<br />

average of nearly eight times after rehabilitation, with<br />

an<br />

earnings per individual averaging more than $83.<br />

weekly<br />

75 percent of the nearly 2,000 persons<br />

Approximately<br />

were unemployed before receiving state<br />

rehabilitated<br />

services. The remainder were individuals<br />

rehabilitation<br />

sheltered workshops and others in short-tenure jobs<br />

in<br />

hope of steady income.<br />

without<br />

experts point out that education and train-<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

for Jobs is of major significance to the handicapped<br />

ing<br />

it is to all segments of our growing population. The<br />

as<br />

is given in relation to the fact that 16 percent of<br />

comment<br />

rehabilitants had less than eighth grade education and<br />

the<br />

percent had completed the ninth, tenth or eleventh<br />

25<br />

grades. Only 44 percent had graduated from high school.<br />

fiscal 1968, the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

In<br />

nearly 22,000 clients or potential clients. This<br />

served<br />

an increase of 34 percent over the preceding fiscal year.<br />

was<br />

dependents, some rehabilitants had as many as i0,<br />

Concerning<br />

while others had none other than themselves.<br />

New Year will have real meaning for an increasing, number<br />

The<br />

individuals who will receive services, be rehabilitated<br />

of<br />

and earn higher incomes.<br />

report, to a degree, is unbalanced. It is a promotional job<br />

This<br />

than one showing both good and bad aspects of the rehabilitation<br />

rather<br />

The caseload statistics published by the Rehabilitation Ser-<br />

program.<br />

Administration for the state Vocational Rehabilitation agencies<br />

vices<br />

1968gives a less sanguine picture. For example, it shows that<br />

in<br />

the United States, as a whole, rehabilitated 20 perce.nt more in 1968<br />

while<br />

209


in 1967, Washington State rehabilitated only 4 percent,more in 1968<br />

than<br />

in 1967. Washington State ranked 49th among the states in number<br />

than<br />

of persons rehabilitated during Fiscal Year 1968.<br />

of persons rehabilitated per 100,000 population, by reEion end state; and rank<br />

Number<br />

state, 1964-1968<br />

by<br />

Rehabilitated per i00,000<br />

Region<br />

i/<br />

and<br />

State i968 1967 1966 195 1964<br />

U. S. Total 104 87 78 70 63<br />

Washington 57 57 44 42 36<br />

1968<br />

1967<br />

Renk<br />

1965 1964<br />

"i966<br />

44 46<br />

is roundsd nearest whole number, based the estimated total population of July I, for each fiscal<br />

Rats<br />

Bureau of the Census Series P-25.<br />

year.<br />

good and the bad aspects of the Vocational Rehabili-<br />

The<br />

program should be publicized. The weaknesses, the omissions,<br />

tation<br />

limitations--not just the success stories--should be reported.<br />

the<br />

has too much to offer to fear that a balanced presen-<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

will have a negative impact on the public. It is likely that<br />

tation<br />

a balanced presentation of rehabilitation, "warts and all," would<br />

such<br />

achieve even better public relations.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

information conferences and meetings be held for high<br />

That<br />

and college students to introduce them to training<br />

school<br />

career opportunities available in vocational rehabili-<br />

and<br />

tation.<br />

techniques could be suggested to improve public re-<br />

Several<br />

of th Vocational Rehabilitation agency.<br />

lations<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

vocational rehabilitation use personnel to contact<br />

That<br />

working with the handicapped to increase awareness<br />

people<br />

the vocational rehabilitation program in the state. The<br />

of<br />

of the agency to help handicapped and disadvantaged<br />

abilities<br />

people and its limitations should be described.<br />

210


Administrative and Operations Studies of Rehabilitation Agency<br />

standards are used for describing clients. They are<br />

Federal<br />

into categories which are designated by numbers and names. As<br />

put<br />

categories are used throughout the country, somewhat comparable<br />

these<br />

can be obtained about various state rehabilitation programs. The<br />

data<br />

data is not publicized much by Vocational Rehabilitation in<br />

following<br />

State of Washington.<br />

the<br />

EXPENDITURES IN DIAGNOSTICS (statuses 00 (Referral) and<br />

TOTAL<br />

(Applicant) FOR CASES CLOSED 08 (Closed from Referral) from<br />

02<br />

(Referral), 02 (Applicant), 04 (Six-monthEvaluation) and<br />

00<br />

(Eighteen-month Evaluation); NUMBER OF CASES AND AMOUNT IN<br />

06<br />

DOLLARS.<br />

Year 1968<br />

Fiscal<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

VOCATIONAL<br />

State of Washington<br />

ACTUAL VALUES<br />

STATUS: No..of Cases Total $<br />

CLOSURE<br />

from: Costs<br />

08<br />

00' 1606 $2,472<br />

Referral<br />

02 3365 62,361<br />

Applicant<br />

Evaluation 04 18 1,464<br />

6-Month<br />

Evaluation 06 55 5,945<br />

18-Month<br />

TOTAL 5044 $72,242<br />

means that in one year more than 5,000 people were con-<br />

This<br />

as potentially eligible for vocational rehabilitation services<br />

sidered<br />

examined further. More than $72,000 was spent on special examina-<br />

until<br />

to help determine eligibility.<br />

tions<br />

was an even greater cost for staff time. The largest<br />

There<br />

cost in.a vocational ehabilitation agency is the cost of a<br />

single<br />

counseling staff.<br />

the degree that counselors and other staff work with more<br />

To<br />

the per unit cost can be lowered. In Washington State<br />

individuals,<br />

counselors work successfully with fewer clients each year. In the<br />

the<br />

States last year 12 people were rehabilitated per man-year of<br />

United<br />

.211


in Washington State 8 persons were rehabilitated per employee<br />

staff;<br />

With the use of ancillary staff, interagency cooperation,<br />

man-year.<br />

an expectation that more clients will be served, the trend will<br />

and<br />

reversed. Than it would be seen that counselors would each year<br />

be<br />

larger numbers of successful rehabilitants. "The greatest good<br />

have<br />

the greatest number" may seem 19th century to us, but it does not<br />

for<br />

seem wrong.<br />

Harbridge House<br />

number of states have utilized Harbridge House, Inc. of<br />

A<br />

Massachusetts, a consulting firm for rehabilitation agencies,<br />

Boston,<br />

assess the functioning of selected parts of the Vocational Rehab-<br />

to<br />

agency. This management consulting firm has much expertise<br />

ilitation<br />

the field of vocational rehabilitation. It is sympathetic to the<br />

in<br />

program but can be objective about individuals and<br />

rehabilitation<br />

working in any particular state. The results of their studies<br />

agencies<br />

constructive ones. The cost of the studies is modest compared to<br />

are<br />

resulting increase in efficiency of the programs of rehabilita-<br />

the<br />

tion.<br />

Harbridge House studies are based in part upon theoretic<br />

The<br />

developed by the consultants, in part on the. numerous studies;<br />

models<br />

rehabilitation programs in other states, and in part on an inten-<br />

of<br />

brief study of the rehabilitation program they are examining.<br />

sive<br />

studies of the vocational rehabilitation agencies<br />

Typical<br />

Harbridge House, Inc. include the following: services to clients;<br />

by<br />

and expenditure patterns; state agency operations; personnel;<br />

funding<br />

communications; program review and control; planning and<br />

internal<br />

program development; and a cost/benefit analysis.<br />

has been no study by an outside consultant firm of<br />

There<br />

kind of the Vocational Rehabilitation program in the State of<br />

this<br />

Washington.<br />

recommend that such a study be undertaken by Harbridge<br />

We<br />

Inc. in 1969.<br />

House,<br />

the five years prior to the beginning of the Planning<br />

In<br />

an average.of $1.3 million of federal funds appropriated for<br />

Project,<br />

vocational rehabilitation of handicapped citizens of Washington<br />

the<br />

reverted unused. This much money could have been used to rehabili-<br />

was<br />

an additional 600 persons a year, or 3,000 more people. "Third<br />

tate<br />

funding" would have permitted the utilization of this federal<br />

party<br />

in our state without any additional state or local appropria-<br />

money<br />

tions.<br />

Interagency Coordination ThroughMulti-Service Centers<br />

of the limitations of the present organization is that<br />

One<br />

rehabilitation staff members counseling handicapped individuals<br />

the<br />

212


isolated geographically and emotionally from other state employees<br />

are<br />

in the helping professions. There is far too little coordina-<br />

involved<br />

with the other state agencies. The reports of ur task forces<br />

tion<br />

with interagency coordination have been specific about this<br />

concerned<br />

For example, a person in a prison is likely to be eligible<br />

matter.<br />

vocational rehabilitation services on the basis that he will have<br />

for<br />

vocational handicap at the time of his parole or discharge from the<br />

a<br />

In this state, he would be handled by the Department of Insti-<br />

prison.<br />

while in prison. As he leaves the prison, let's assume, he<br />

tutions<br />

be involved with a parole officer. If he begins to look for<br />

would<br />

he would be seen by the Employment Security Department.<br />

employment<br />

man is likely to feel very frustrated as he goes from agency to<br />

This<br />

in different parts of the town seeking help. If he receives<br />

agency<br />

the other agencies the same kind of initial rejection which he<br />

from<br />

likely to receive from the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation--<br />

is<br />

he is put on a waiting list and told that he would be contacted in<br />

if<br />

months or so--then he is not likely to have effective govern-<br />

three<br />

services which will rehabilitate him. It would seem that the<br />

mental<br />

government might well consider having these several agencies<br />

state<br />

under one umbrella agency to help insure the availability of<br />

combined<br />

to the handicapped person at the time he needs it. Rehabili-<br />

services<br />

services deferred are likely to be rehabilitation services<br />

tation<br />

denied.<br />

these several state agencies are not combined into one<br />

If<br />

paper, perhaps they can be housed in each community in such a way<br />

on<br />

they will function as one. The multi-purpose center concept is<br />

that<br />

one being described here.<br />

the<br />

Multi-Service Centers<br />

complex array of services designed to meet citizens needs<br />

The<br />

be applied more efficiently. This can best be accomplished through<br />

must<br />

systemof multi-service centers. In such centers the whole stress of<br />

a<br />

action will shift from rigidly separate departmental pro-<br />

government<br />

as employment, rehabilitation, financial assistance--to a<br />

grams--such<br />

attack on the problems of the individual or family.<br />

unified<br />

through such a coordinated program can we expect to<br />

Only<br />

their economic independence to remove them from welfare rolls<br />

establish<br />

and from prolonged dependence on government.<br />

multi-service center will bring together, at a centralized<br />

A<br />

within a poverty area, all state resources which can be mobil-<br />

location<br />

to meet the needs of all disadvantaged citizens. Development of<br />

ized<br />

centers will be coordinated with appropriate federal, county and<br />

such<br />

agencies and community action groups. Such pooling of services<br />

local<br />

make available to citizens a meaningful program to improve their<br />

will<br />

economic and social status. A multi-service center has<br />

vocational,<br />

in Seattle since 1967. Its success is the forerunner of a<br />

operated<br />

network of such centers planned for Washington State.<br />

213


concept of service seeks to remove some of the barriers<br />

This<br />

have kept government services from effectively penetrating the<br />

which<br />

Indian reservations, migrant labor camps--barriers such as<br />

ghettos,<br />

facilities, inadequate transportation for the poor, frag-<br />

scattered<br />

mentation of services, and endless referrals.<br />

scope of the multi-service center will vary with the<br />

The<br />

of the community, If such a center is already operating in<br />

needs<br />

community, an effort will be made to supplement or complement<br />

the<br />

already is being done. Services will be removed from the center<br />

which<br />

evaluation indicates the need has been eliminated. State services<br />

when<br />

the centers will be drawn in part from the following present ele-<br />

in<br />

ments of government:<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Division<br />

Qf Labor and Industries<br />

Department<br />

of Health<br />

Department<br />

of Public Assistance<br />

Department<br />

Security Department<br />

Employment<br />

of Economic Opportunity<br />

Office<br />

of Institutions<br />

Department<br />

Rehabilitation Council<br />

Veterans'<br />

agencies (including the Office of State<br />

Education<br />

of Public Instruction, State<br />

Superintendent<br />

for Community College Education,<br />

Board<br />

of higher learning)<br />

institutions<br />

centers are intended to reduce citizen depen-<br />

Multi-service<br />

on welfare through job training, placement and related programs.<br />

dence<br />

achieve this goal, it is necessary to strengthen both departmental<br />

To<br />

and commitment to the basic objective of government--meeting<br />

resources<br />

needs of citizens. Coordination of such services has been an ob-<br />

the<br />

long sought after but seldom achieved. Differences in sources<br />

jective<br />

authority, philosophy, techniques, interest groups and attitudes<br />

of<br />

departments of state government present the major obstacles to the<br />

of<br />

successful operation of multi-service centers.<br />

Ne__wCon__ts.with Multi-Service Centers<br />

of these differences has prompted introduction<br />

Recognition<br />

other states of important and novel concepts of state services,<br />

in<br />

namely:<br />

Establishment of a common intake unit serving<br />

i.<br />

but separate departmental units.<br />

allied<br />

Development of a systematic, coordinated approach<br />

2.<br />

provide a "prescription program" aimed at<br />

to<br />

assuring economic independence for individuals.<br />

214


Establishment of a field follow-up system<br />

3.<br />

evaluate progress and, where necessary,<br />

to<br />

alter the coordinated "prescription programs.<br />

the lack of coordination which frequently characterizes<br />

Thus<br />

autonomous service programs will be reduced. Under the new<br />

existing<br />

all departments sacrifice a certain amount of autonomy in the<br />

model<br />

of the greater objective of concerted unified service focused<br />

interest<br />

upon the citizen.<br />

Administrative Locations of the State Vocational Rehabilitation Agency<br />

administrative location of the State Rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

has been a matter of highest concern to the Planning Commission.<br />

Agency<br />

considerable time has been spent trying to develop a consensus. The<br />

A<br />

to this year has been concerned with this matter. Biennial<br />

Legislature<br />

estimates for the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation pre-<br />

budget<br />

in the summer of 1968, contain the following statement:<br />

pared<br />

service .techniques are more advanced than<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

the capacities of administration to secure funds and<br />

are<br />

to augment these service techniques. These problems<br />

staff<br />

organization and administration have serious conse-<br />

of<br />

in relation to the speed and effect£veess with<br />

quences<br />

services are delivered to needy individuals. There<br />

which<br />

recognition that all governmental service programs<br />

is<br />

from inadequate coordination. We tried to learn<br />

suffer<br />

such a commonly recognized problem is so persistently<br />

why<br />

us.<br />

with<br />

his inaugural address on January 15, 1969, Governor<br />

In<br />

J. Evans, in speaking toga joint, session of the Legislature<br />

Daniel<br />

andby radio to all the people, said in part:<br />

THE REORGANIZATION PRIORITY<br />

decisions of government are too important and the conse-<br />

The<br />

too grave to allow the executive branch to function<br />

quences<br />

an organization designed to serve the past, and with<br />

with<br />

which make it impossible to serve the future.<br />

restrictions<br />

is time to reconstruct the executive branch of govern-<br />

It<br />

so that we can begin to manage the business of the<br />

ment<br />

instead of just cope with it; so that we can bring<br />

people,<br />

services of government to bear quickly on emerging<br />

the<br />

of dividing our functions through dozens<br />

problems--instead<br />

functions in far too many separate departments and<br />

of<br />

agencies.<br />

215


cannot be run exactly like a business--but<br />

Government<br />

does it say that government must be run in ignor-<br />

nowhere<br />

of business principles. And nowhere can you find<br />

ance<br />

for the contention that size is a realistic<br />

justification<br />

substitute for efficiency.<br />

the next several days, this administration will<br />

Within<br />

a series of bills dealing with the reorganization<br />

introduce<br />

the executive branch of government. Six of these have<br />

of<br />

recommended by the Task Force on Executive Organiza-<br />

been<br />

a bipartisan group of citizens whom I believe, share<br />

tion,<br />

average citizen's concern that government should be<br />

the<br />

to meet the needs of the people, and not to serve<br />

designed<br />

pleasure of its tenants.<br />

the<br />

shall either reorganize or we shall suffocate in the<br />

We<br />

of an outdated and ineffective system of adminis-<br />

quicksand<br />

The details are debatable, but the principle is<br />

tration.<br />

we must forge a government structure which can plan<br />

clear:<br />

and a structure which can deliver whole<br />

comprehensively<br />

to whole problems. I believe.this Legislature<br />

solutions<br />

respond to the very real needs of executive reorganiza-<br />

will<br />

tion.<br />

PLANNING without action is futile;<br />

ACTION without pannng is fatal.<br />

216


Personnel Recruitment, Training, and Utilization<br />

a speech to the professional staff of Vocational Rehabili-<br />

In<br />

in February, 1966, Mr. H. @. Socolofsky, Assistant Director for<br />

tation<br />

Field Services, said:<br />

What New Programs and Which New Services?<br />

the beginning, let me say Sincerely that the Vocational<br />

In<br />

Officer is the key professional worker in<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Division, and therefore your opinions and suggestions<br />

the<br />

of prime importance in planning the future of the<br />

are<br />

Division.<br />

has made interesting breakthroughs in certain<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

areas and has arrived at solutions which, prudently and care-<br />

problem<br />

applied, can have a major impact on many of the social problems<br />

fully<br />

our times. What is rehabilitation'sgreatest challenge? It is<br />

of<br />

quality, adequacy, and multiplicity of the ability of the voca-<br />

the<br />

rehabilitation program to staff this effort. We are experi-<br />

tional<br />

fantastic growth and planning for even greater growth in the<br />

encing<br />

several years. How do you find the proper people to run vital<br />

next<br />

of overly-rapid expansion? In a very real way rehabilitation<br />

areas<br />

confronted with the same set of problems that confronts any dynamic<br />

is<br />

and governmental agency. It is necessary to gamble on exist-<br />

industry<br />

technology and knowledge to elevate people, into areas for which<br />

ing<br />

are not equipped, to find short cuts to equip these people as<br />

they<br />

as possible, to recruit, to retrain, and to upgrade. These<br />

well<br />

critical problems confront both rehabilitation and business.<br />

As John Gardner stated so well,<br />

plain fact is that all over this country today trouble<br />

The<br />

brewing and social evils accumulating while our patterns<br />

is<br />

social and professional organization keep able and gifted<br />

of<br />

leaders on the sidelines.<br />

potential<br />

laws, dollars and programs don't teach children nor<br />

Federal<br />

thesick. Teachers teach children and doctors heal<br />

heal<br />

sick--individual teachers and doctors in the schools and<br />

the<br />

of Atlanta and Seattle and Phoenix. In other words,<br />

clinics<br />

depends upon increased vitality out where the<br />

everything<br />

is.<br />

action<br />

the field of government, rehabilitation has retained a<br />

In<br />

quality of talent. The day-to-day work of rehabilitation re-<br />

select<br />

a unique degree of skill. But what is more important, most<br />

quires<br />

people sincerely and intensely believe that their work<br />

rehabilitation<br />

important and productive. It is different with some helping agencies--<br />

is<br />

recruit many talented workers, but the extreme frustration of<br />

they<br />

being unable to see tangible accomplishments in their daily efforts<br />

217


off the best talent. If a ten-year cycle of an average govern-<br />

drives<br />

agency were analyzed, the amount of talent flowing through<br />

mental<br />

appear impressive, but the amount retained would appear very<br />

would<br />

indeed. In much of the United States this has not been true<br />

modest<br />

rehabilitation, where talent is both obtained and retained. It is<br />

of<br />

however, always used wisely, and this is an rea of serious<br />

not,<br />

problems.<br />

ability of rehabilitation to recruit talent from the<br />

The<br />

centers shows a different problem than business has.<br />

university<br />

can give a counselor freedom to practice his unique<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

and that is what a talented, creative person wants. This<br />

expertise<br />

exists in some rehabilitation agencies, but not in all. It<br />

freedom<br />

not exist to the degree that is desirable and often seems to<br />

does<br />

despite rather than because of the efforts of key administrators<br />

exist<br />

It exists simply because the program has grown so rapidly<br />

involved.<br />

administrators have not been entirely able to control it and<br />

that<br />

talent has been able to advance faster into wider areas of author-<br />

new<br />

ity and discretio than they could normally expect.<br />

Needs in Rehabilitation ""UIS. Estimated Needs<br />

Personnel<br />

Annually<br />

Immediately<br />

Rehabilitation counselors<br />

i.<br />

Physiatrists<br />

2.<br />

Prosthetists-orthotists<br />

3.<br />

Speech pathologists-audiologists<br />

4.<br />

Occupational therapists<br />

5.<br />

Physical therapists<br />

6.<br />

Social workers in rehabilitation<br />

7.<br />

Rehabilitation nurses<br />

8.<br />

Psychologists<br />

9.<br />

Rehabilitation of the. deaf<br />

i0.<br />

Rehabilitation of the blind<br />

ii.<br />

Rehabilitation facilities administration<br />

12.<br />

3,000<br />

1,600<br />

500<br />

2,000<br />

180<br />

500<br />

1,500<br />

2,000<br />

4,000<br />

12,000<br />

4,000<br />

13,500<br />

3,000<br />

15,000<br />

i00<br />

i00<br />

250<br />

250<br />

50<br />

175<br />

50<br />

150<br />

i00<br />

i00<br />

STATE DATA BOOK, 1966. U.S.<br />

From:<br />

of Health, Education<br />

Department<br />

and Welfare.<br />

larger growth problem impinges upon the more specific<br />

The<br />

of staffing. Educational centers can produce only a certain<br />

problem<br />

of needed personnel, and these sometimes lack the needed level<br />

number<br />

sophistication, intensity and practical experience. The vocational<br />

of<br />

counselor expertise has been developed over years of<br />

rehabilitation<br />

but certain aspects of it have remained isolated in the<br />

experience,<br />

of a few people who have not found ways of communicating it to<br />

minds<br />

newer personnel entering the field.<br />

the<br />

218


leaflet prepared in September, 1967, by Professor J. R.<br />

A<br />

Ph.D., describes the Rehabilitation Counselor Education<br />

Forster,<br />

Program of the University of Washington as follows:<br />

The program was developed to provide educational<br />

Purpose:<br />

leading to a masters degree.for prospective and<br />

experiences<br />

practicing vocational rehabilitation counselors.<br />

Descriptive Information:<br />

program was initiated with partial funding by the<br />

The<br />

Rehabilitation Administration in 1966, after<br />

Vocational<br />

planning by the College and Education and the<br />

joint<br />

of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.<br />

Department<br />

program is a two-hear (six quarters) academic program<br />

The<br />

to a Master of Education degree in Rehabilitation<br />

leading<br />

Included in the program are courses taken in<br />

Counseling.<br />

College of Education, Physical Medicine and Rehabili-<br />

the<br />

Social Work, and Psychology. The students parti-<br />

tation,<br />

in internships at local rehabilitation agencies two<br />

cipate<br />

days a week during the entire second year of their program.<br />

full-time trainees and one part-time student<br />

Fourteen<br />

during the first academic year, 1966-67, and will<br />

attended<br />

into their second year in September, 1967. Ten<br />

continue<br />

thirteen new full-time trainees will begin their studies<br />

to<br />

the coming academic year, along with two to four<br />

during<br />

students.<br />

part-time<br />

the 1967-68 year, twenty-seven stipends of $1800 and<br />

For<br />

been authorized by VRA, along with support for<br />

$2000rhave<br />

two to four part-time.students.<br />

Long-Range Plans<br />

is expected that the regular student program will continue<br />

It<br />

the 1967-68 level with approximately 26 full-time trainees,<br />

at<br />

one-half of whom Will graduate each year.<br />

the confines of future financial resources, the pro-<br />

Within<br />

for part-time students will be developed to meet what-<br />

gram<br />

needs are expressed by the Washington Division of Voca-<br />

ever<br />

Rehabilitation and other rehabilitation agencies for<br />

tional<br />

training of their regular personnel. (There is evidence<br />

the<br />

a substantial proportion of the Washington Vocational<br />

that<br />

Officers are interested in further graduate<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

training if release time for such efforts is available.)<br />

level<br />

the curriculum and administrative program become more<br />

As<br />

settled, plans for expanded research in the field will<br />

firmly<br />

be developed.<br />

219


Rehabilitation has not as a rule studied how<br />

Vocational<br />

it uses skilled people. Every device possible should be<br />

effectively<br />

at the counselor's disposal to maximize the amount of time he<br />

put<br />

within his professional competence. We forget the amount of<br />

spends<br />

professional talent spent in clerical activi>y. Little real<br />

rare<br />

has been spent devising methodsof supporting skilled personnel<br />

effort<br />

lesser skilled help. Specialization of function of professional<br />

with<br />

members with ample clerical and stenographic support can enhance<br />

staff<br />

the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program.<br />

ratio of secretaries to counselors, which in the State<br />

The<br />

Washington has been less than one to one, should be changed so<br />

of<br />

more of the work is done by clerical personnel. Case aides also<br />

that<br />

be used in this way. It is important that the racial or ethnic<br />

can<br />

be considered in the selection of case aides. Indians, for<br />

factor<br />

should be selected to work as case aides with other Indians.<br />

example,<br />

Americans or Mexican Americans who have been in the migrant<br />

Spanish<br />

and speak the languate of the migrants should be selected to<br />

stream<br />

work with these people. Perhaps a fifth of all staff members<br />

help<br />

be case aides. If case aides are selected as people who can<br />

should<br />

well with others they are likely to be more effective as change<br />

work<br />

than the counselors who are now employed. They work for less.<br />

agents<br />

has been proposed that in the larger offices a video tape machine<br />

It<br />

provided to record these initial interviews of the clients. The<br />

be<br />

of these interviews, privately of course, can be used as<br />

screening<br />

teaching technique and can also be used to inform the counselor<br />

a<br />

about the initial needs of his potential clients.<br />

Planning Commission has been concerned with the staff<br />

The<br />

to handicapped persons. As a result,<br />

services<br />

THE CO4ISSION RECOMMENDS<br />

an intensive series of training programs be expanded<br />

That<br />

adequately financed for personnel at all levels within<br />

and<br />

vocational rehabilitation.<br />

training programs.for non-college bound youth be estab-<br />

That<br />

to prepare them for para-professional positions in<br />

lished<br />

rehabilitation.<br />

since the basic role of persons in some helping pro-<br />

That<br />

is similar, part of the training programs for new<br />

fessions<br />

and in-service training programs for those in<br />

employees<br />

employment should be together. Those trained together<br />

state<br />

be rehabilitation counselors, employment security<br />

would<br />

public assistance caseworkers, probation and<br />

counselors,<br />

officers, public health nurses, and the like. This<br />

parole<br />

of the training could be done under the State Depart-<br />

part<br />

ment of Personnel.<br />

220


a program of undergraduate college education in rehabili-<br />

That<br />

beinstituted.<br />

tation<br />

has been proposed that there be a different method for<br />

It<br />

rehabilitation counselors. At this time they are chosen<br />

selecting<br />

upon the basis of their academic background and profes-<br />

principally<br />

experience. People selected in this way are not necessarily<br />

sional<br />

with the personal, qualities of genuineness, empathy and warmth,<br />

those<br />

as the effective and desirable counseling traits in changing<br />

regarded<br />

behavior. Methods to select people with these characteristics<br />

client<br />

being developed.<br />

are<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

an orientation and training program be initiated and<br />

That<br />

for fieldrehabilitation counselors to inform them<br />

continued<br />

demonstration, seminars andvisits to facilities<br />

through<br />

the state of the problems faced by clients with heart<br />

within<br />

cancer, stroke and other severely disabling conditions.<br />

disease,<br />

efforts should be made to recruit staff members who<br />

Greater<br />

received formal training in rehabilitation counseling.<br />

have<br />

staff members should be offered such training on a<br />

Present<br />

part-time basis or by correspondence.<br />

has been further suggested that the time of the counselor<br />

It<br />

too valuable to be frittered away in_clerical tasks and adminis-<br />

is<br />

duties which can be done as well or better by others. The<br />

trative<br />

job can be done at less cost if counselors are utilized princi-<br />

total<br />

as change agents or counselors and not as high priced completers<br />

pally<br />

forms. The cost per client is rising at a rapid rate. This rate<br />

of<br />

be slowed or stopped if it were possible to free the counselor<br />

might<br />

his highest and best use, by utilizing case aides, secretaries,<br />

for<br />

and the like to do some of the work which until recently<br />

interviewers,<br />

been done by counselors.<br />

has<br />

interviewer could be assigned to see the client at the<br />

An<br />

he first comes to the office. A delay of not more than an hour<br />

time<br />

the most that should be imposed. At this time, clients in busy<br />

is<br />

are sometimes not seen for three months. This can have<br />

offices<br />

consequences for the client who needs immediate services.<br />

catastrophic<br />

interviewer can be a clerical staff member who is able to meet<br />

The<br />

the clients in a helpful way. The client would be helped.to<br />

with<br />

any necessary forms. The basic data gathering would be<br />

complete<br />

at that time. The general medical examination form could<br />

initiated<br />

completed and the authorization made for the examination. Records<br />

be<br />

other institutions and transcripts of academic work could be<br />

from<br />

If the interviewer were new on the job or were having<br />

obtained.<br />

making a decision about a particular client, then she<br />

difficulty<br />

ask for assistance from one of the counselors. Normally, before<br />

could<br />

examinations were authorized e.g., orthopedic examinations,<br />

specialty<br />

examinations, the counselor could be contacted.<br />

psychiatric<br />

221


is recommended that there be a new job title in large<br />

It<br />

People so employed would be compensated at<br />

offices--"interviewer."<br />

higher rate than other clerical staff members. The person so<br />

a<br />

would normally be employed from the clerical staff. They<br />

selected<br />

need to be able to do their usual clerical-stenographic duties<br />

would<br />

well as the basic interviewing.<br />

as<br />

THE COMMISSION RECO4ENDS:<br />

information conferences and meetings be held for high<br />

That<br />

and college students to introduce them to training<br />

school<br />

and career opportunities available in vocational rehabilitation.<br />

that the Federal and state laws have been amended to<br />

Now<br />

the socially disadvantaged eligible for vocational rehabilitatin<br />

make<br />

when other qualifications are met, it is all the more impor-<br />

services<br />

to have indigenous .case aides. These are people selected from<br />

tant<br />

the group of socially disadvantaged people who are to be served.<br />

Utilization of Completed Research<br />

THECOMMISSIONRECOMIENDS:<br />

increased efforts should also be made to computerize and<br />

That<br />

information retrieval processes.<br />

develop<br />

the 1960s rehabilitation did not have close ties with<br />

Until<br />

Research was a seldom-used tool until recently. There<br />

universities.<br />

now an acceleration of research.. The research information needs<br />

is<br />

be disseminated more widely among the people who have the oppor-<br />

to<br />

to utilize the information. A RESEARCH BRIEF describing efforts<br />

tunity<br />

bring research into effective focus follows:<br />

to<br />

222


esea rc<br />

ffective<br />

Vol. II, No. 8 February 3, 1969<br />

MANAGING THE INFORMATION EXPLOSION<br />

information explosion of recent years has<br />

The<br />

grave problems for all professional<br />

created<br />

who naturally wish to keep up with re-<br />

worlers,<br />

in their respective fields. Informative<br />

search<br />

of completed research on topics of in-<br />

abstracts<br />

can greatly help them to do this.<br />

terest<br />

an example of such a helpful enterprise, the<br />

As<br />

Rehabilitation Research Institute at the<br />

Regional<br />

of Florida prepared Management and<br />

University<br />

Abstracts, containing 1,000 abstracts<br />

Personnel<br />

management and personnel, indexed by key<br />

on<br />

The abstracts were selected from the<br />

words.<br />

issues of 51 journals in business, per-<br />

1964-67<br />

management, data processing, and re-<br />

sonnel,<br />

lated areas.<br />

following samples from the publication,<br />

The<br />

to highlight supervision as a management<br />

chosen<br />

illustrate the usefulness of such ab-<br />

function,<br />

Insofar as the utilization of effective<br />

stracts.<br />

results may, as one of its dividends,<br />

research<br />

management practices, such a collec-<br />

improve<br />

of abstracts also has great value for re-<br />

tion<br />

utilization. The capital letters in paren-<br />

search<br />

with the exception of "HMC," permit the<br />

thesis,<br />

to locate each abstract in the publication<br />

reader<br />

just as he would find a word in the dictionary.<br />

Recruitment<br />

While recruiters seek to attract and employ<br />

•<br />

candidates for jobs, the following "crimes,"<br />

top<br />

committed, are a sure guide to failure:<br />

often<br />

searching for a man before you know what<br />

begin<br />

really want or why; sidestep specific ques-<br />

you<br />

about agency objectives; avoid the need to<br />

tions<br />

between two or more good men byfalling<br />

decide<br />

contact them; delay decisions as long as pos-<br />

to<br />

pass the buck; never check references;<br />

sible;<br />

do not question applicant's competence.<br />

and<br />

(BAERJA RGS)<br />

The pitfalls of "oversell" in college recruit-<br />

•<br />

by business firms may have general manage-<br />

ing<br />

significance. "Oversell" conveys informa-<br />

ment<br />

directly or indirectly, which misrepresents<br />

tion,<br />

job or orga.nization in a favorable light.<br />

the<br />

deliberate, it usually results from over-<br />

Rarely<br />

or inaccurate information. It can<br />

enthusiasm<br />

impair an organization's reputation.<br />

gravely<br />

(ZWE RE. OMP)<br />

Ongoing Supervision<br />

For supervisors who are unsure of how to<br />

•<br />

their creative personnel, the following<br />

handle<br />

may help: the creative person is not<br />

guides<br />

by the same forces as run-of-the-mill<br />

motivated<br />

is harder to manage than others, often<br />

workers;<br />

a strong touch of egotism; should be<br />

having<br />

if possible by other creative persons;<br />

managed<br />

should be generously rewarded for good<br />

and<br />

work. (HMC, page 1}<br />

The evidence is that the unskilled worker<br />

•<br />

adjusts well to his routine job but gets<br />

usually<br />

real satisfaction from it. In view of this,<br />

little<br />

following motivators for unskilled workers<br />

the<br />

suggested: treat the man as if he were al-<br />

are<br />

what he could and should be; explain the<br />

ready<br />

emphasize its importance, and tell why it<br />

job,<br />

be done on time; recognize superior work<br />

must<br />

give credit when worker accomplishes some-<br />

and<br />

with the aid of others; allow reasonable<br />

thing<br />

symbols; make sure the employee has the<br />

status<br />

to participate in training programs; and<br />

chance<br />

train supervisors to<br />

recognize, understand, and<br />

with the attitudes of unskilled workers.<br />

deal<br />

MMU)<br />

(JANEHA<br />

Although the evidence is clear that managers<br />

•<br />

delegate authority, and managers know they<br />

must<br />

do all the work for which they are respon-<br />

cannot<br />

there are still many reasons why execu-<br />

sible,<br />

find it very hard to let subordinates help<br />

tives<br />

These include overestimation of the ex-<br />

them.<br />

to which they themselves can do the work<br />

tent<br />

and feelings of insecurity in their<br />

better,<br />

own jobs and in relationships with superiors.<br />

by the Research Utilization Branch, Division of Research and Demonstration Grants, Office of Research, Demonstrations, and<br />

*Prepared<br />

Social and Rehabilitation Service, Department of Health Education, and Welfare Washington., D.C. 2020.<br />

Training<br />

223


are given for improving delegation.<br />

Suggestions<br />

BBD)<br />

(GIBBCH<br />

The fine art of questioning can help to solve<br />

•<br />

interpersonal and organizational problems<br />

many<br />

from poor communication. The ques-<br />

arising<br />

when the goal is mutual understanding,<br />

tioner,<br />

create and maintain a good climate for<br />

should<br />

ask the right questions in the<br />

communication,<br />

way, and listen perceptively to all re-<br />

right<br />

Techniques for asking questions are<br />

sponses.<br />

discussed. (NATHER AAQ)<br />

Managers need to consider the degree of<br />

•<br />

in their work relations. Too often, strong<br />

honesty<br />

toward a person or group are denied or<br />

feelings<br />

Feelings, a real part of organizational<br />

ignored.<br />

are often disvalued, and their suppression<br />

life,<br />

the organization. Typically, the "avoid-<br />

harms<br />

pattern," based on the assumption that<br />

ance<br />

are either irrelevant or disruptive, is<br />

feelings<br />

It is better rouse "problem-orientedfeed-<br />

used.<br />

to individuals and groups, on the assump-<br />

back"<br />

that suppressed feelings cause organiza-<br />

tion<br />

and personal deterioration. (OSHRBA<br />

tional<br />

CAH)<br />

When management does not understand<br />

•<br />

needs, much conflict may result and the<br />

worker<br />

may flourish. Management can under-<br />

grapevine<br />

the grapevine by developing three basic<br />

cut<br />

skills: listen to what personnel<br />

communication<br />

what they do not say, and what they want<br />

say,<br />

say but do not. The grapevine can also be<br />

to<br />

by paying attention to five top factors<br />

weakened<br />

motivate employees: job security,<br />

which<br />

by peers and superiors, interesting<br />

recogn.,tion<br />

fringe benefits, and chance to advance.<br />

work,<br />

WDA)<br />

(MESCDRP.<br />

Since womenare in the working world to stay,<br />

•<br />

must learn how to utilize this grow-<br />

managers<br />

resource. Most women are not interested in<br />

ing<br />

rivals to man, but are motivated by<br />

being<br />

satisfactions from job and working<br />

intrinsic<br />

Make the work area congenial to them.<br />

place.<br />

for social contacts on the job. Bear in<br />

Allow<br />

their family obligations. Use their in-<br />

mind<br />

in people and welfare, their aptitude for<br />

terests<br />

effort, and their drive toward harmony.<br />

patient<br />

(LEVIH MWW)<br />

Evaluation<br />

Evaluation of personnel can provide top<br />

•<br />

with much information needed in<br />

management<br />

for the future, and give those being<br />

planning<br />

an idea of how well they are doing.<br />

appraised<br />

often, the second objective is not met, for<br />

Too<br />

is afraid to be critical. One way<br />

management<br />

avoid defensive attitudes in staff by includ-<br />

out:<br />

self-appraisal of performance and potential<br />

ing<br />

in evaluation interviews. (LANDM LHK)<br />

The employee appraisal interview must be<br />

•<br />

with an understanding of its sensitivity<br />

conducted<br />

both company and employee are to benefit. The<br />

if<br />

should reflect carefully beforehand<br />

supervisor<br />

the job, the man, and himself. Specifically,<br />

on<br />

should consider the framework into which the<br />

he<br />

job fits, criteria for acceptable per-<br />

man's<br />

on it, whether successful performance<br />

formance<br />

specific aptitudes, whether present job<br />

requires<br />

conducive to the person's growth in the<br />

is<br />

the person's past and present job<br />

organization,<br />

and how it may be explained, and<br />

performance<br />

the employee's attitude toward the inter-<br />

what<br />

may be. (NOLARC RBI)<br />

view<br />

Termination<br />

A well-conducted exit interview can produce<br />

•<br />

information for management. The in-<br />

valuable<br />

should be structured and unhurried,<br />

terview<br />

place in a private office, and be conducted<br />

take<br />

someone high enough in the organization to<br />

by<br />

and assess significant information and<br />

recognize<br />

remedial action when indicated. Despite its<br />

take<br />

validity, information so obtained can.<br />

limited<br />

much about employee attitudes, agency<br />

tell<br />

and a wide range of other matters<br />

procedures,<br />

which may need attention. (BAHNCH EUE)<br />

Research Brief is based on Management and Personnel Abstracts (edited by Dr. Neil S. Dumas), a product of RD-<br />

This<br />

of which Dr. John E. Muthardis Project Director. Copies of the publication are available from the grantee. Ad-<br />

1127-G,<br />

requests to KWIC Ii, Regional Rehabilitation Research Institute, J. Hillis Miller Health Center, University of<br />

dress<br />

Gainesville, Florida 32601.<br />

Florida,<br />

224


Planning Tppics<br />

Special<br />

Barriers<br />

Architectural<br />

fifth task force was concerned with barriers to employ-<br />

Our<br />

of the handicapped, including architectural barriers. Task force<br />

ment<br />

members were sent copies of the following listed documents:<br />

for All Americans: Report of Design he National<br />

on ArchitecturalBarriers to Rehabilitation<br />

Commission<br />

the Handicapped. U. S. Department of Health, Educa-<br />

of<br />

and Welfare, Rehabilitation Services Administration,<br />

tion,<br />

December 1967.<br />

Facilities Accessible to the Physically Handi-<br />

Making<br />

Performance Criteria, State University of New<br />

capped:<br />

York, Albany, New York, July 1967.<br />

Development and Effects of an Inexpensive Elevator<br />

The<br />

Eliminating Architectural Barriers in Public<br />

fo__r<br />

by Harold E. Yuker (and others). Hofstra<br />

Bu$1dings,<br />

Hempstead, New York, October 1966.<br />

University,<br />

the Doors, (folder) President"s Committee on<br />

He_Open<br />

of the Handicapped. Undated.<br />

Employment<br />

general, the reports of this task force indicate that<br />

In<br />

barriers are the major concern of those who have studied<br />

architectural<br />

situation. However, there seems to be a feeling of impotence on<br />

the<br />

part of the general informed public about action that might be<br />

the<br />

by them to reduce architectural barriers. The state law spon-<br />

taken<br />

by Representative Marjorie Lynch of Yakima in the 1967 Legis-<br />

sored<br />

making it mandatory that buildings constructed with state<br />

lature,<br />

be accessible to the handicapped was applauded. There seems to<br />

money<br />

the feeling that architects,, designers, and engineers should be<br />

be<br />

ones who should be knowledgeable about barriers, and that they<br />

the<br />

should be forced to eliminate barriers as much as they can.<br />

seemed to be general agreement that little can be<br />

There<br />

about buildings previously constructed. Efforts should be made<br />

done<br />

reduce the barriers in new construction and when there is major<br />

to<br />

Not only should all government owned and used build-<br />

reconstruction.<br />

such as schools, post offices, be accessible to the handicapped,<br />

ings<br />

transportation facilities, eating facilities, businesses, .and<br />

but<br />

like should be in buildings accessible to all major potential<br />

the<br />

users.<br />

an article entitled, "Escape From Confinement," January<br />

In<br />

Journal of Rehabilitation, Kurt Dreifuss said:<br />

1969<br />

225


years ago a group of physically handicapped persons<br />

Two<br />

Disabled Adults Residential Enterprises<br />

representing<br />

came to the Welfare Council of Metropolitan<br />

(DARE),<br />

to seek help in freeing severely handicapped<br />

Chicago<br />

from virtual imprisonment within their homes. They<br />

people<br />

for three things: architecturally barrier-free<br />

asked<br />

transportation to accommodate persons in wheel<br />

housing;<br />

on crutches, or otherwise using prosthetic aids to<br />

chairs,<br />

about; and greater opportunity for gainful employment,<br />

get<br />

recreation and participation in the normal life<br />

education,<br />

of .their community.<br />

an example of a task force report concerned with archi-<br />

As<br />

barriers, the following is presented. It was prepared under<br />

tectural<br />

direction of Mr. Bruce Johnson, Chairman of Task Force V, of<br />

the<br />

IV, which includes Olympia and Tacoma. Mrs. Sherman Pinto is<br />

Region<br />

General Chairman of this region. This task force recommended:<br />

the Commission urge the Governor to supplement<br />

That<br />

35, Laws of 1967, dealing with the elimination<br />

Chapter<br />

architectural barriers from public buildings by<br />

of<br />

the incorporation of appropriate legal stan-<br />

requiring<br />

dards into state and local building codes,-<br />

the Commission encourage local committees throughout<br />

That<br />

State of Washington. to learn what barriers to the<br />

the<br />

of the handicapped can beremoved at reasonable<br />

employment<br />

in the design and construction of new buildings and<br />

cost<br />

facilities, both private and public; to "watch dog"<br />

public<br />

enforcement of Chapter 35; to require the removal of<br />

the<br />

barriers wherever feasible in remodeling<br />

architectural<br />

public buildings.<br />

existing<br />

the Commission report urge every school giving a<br />

That<br />

in architecture and building design to include in<br />

course<br />

curriculum a chapter on elimination of barriers (i)<br />

the<br />

employment of the handicapped, and (2) to the use of<br />

to<br />

public buildings by the blind, aged, and disabled;<br />

all<br />

licensing examinations for architects include sections<br />

that<br />

requiring knowledge of this curriculum.<br />

the 1968 report of the National Commission on Archi-<br />

That<br />

Barriers to Rehabilitation of the Handicapped be<br />

tectural<br />

available to Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

made<br />

and that they cooperate in efforts to make build-<br />

employees<br />

and facilities accessible to all disabled persons;<br />

ings<br />

that Division of Vocational Rehabilitation make<br />

further,<br />

report available to appropriately interested agencies<br />

this<br />

persons.<br />

and<br />

226


Transportation<br />

Buell presented info rmation indicating the con¢ern of<br />

Mr.<br />

Indoor Sports Club loclly and nationally, in the<br />

the<br />

of barriers to free movement of wheel chair<br />

elimination<br />

persons. He mentioned particularly turnstiles in<br />

limited<br />

centers and basement and mezzanine restrooms in bus<br />

shopping<br />

railroad depots which are very difficult for wheel chair<br />

and<br />

His organizationhas been in touch with the<br />

travelers.<br />

Institute of Architecture and Park and Recreation<br />

American<br />

about making all facili.ties available to the handi-<br />

Boards<br />

capped.<br />

(End of excerpt from task force report)<br />

a result of the recommendations of a number of task<br />

As<br />

the Planning Commission on January 25, 1969 voted to have a<br />

forces,<br />

to Congress, concerning the transportation of handicapped<br />

Memorial<br />

in the United States. This Memorial, introduced by the Honor-<br />

people<br />

John Merrill in the House of Representatives, became House Joint<br />

able<br />

No. 9. The Memorial is quoted in full, as follows:<br />

Memorial<br />

Many physically handicapped Americans--two hundred<br />

WHEREAS,<br />

thousand in wheelchairs; two hundred thousand with<br />

fifty<br />

leg braces; one hundred forty thousand with artificial<br />

heavy<br />

and five million with heart conditions--are attempt-<br />

limbs;<br />

ing to maintain their self-respect through employment; and<br />

Many of them need to use public transportation<br />

WHEREAS,<br />

and<br />

facilities;<br />

These handicapped and others who are blind or aged<br />

WHEREAS,<br />

that flights of stairs, curbs, revolving doors, out-of-<br />

find<br />

drinking fountains and telephones, narrow doorways,<br />

reach<br />

restroom facilities, high steps on buses and<br />

inadequate<br />

and other similar restrictions, tend to deny them<br />

trains,<br />

access to transportation facilities and to buildings<br />

free<br />

which they might pursue valuable business, educational,<br />

in<br />

and recreational objectives; and<br />

social<br />

Architectural and transportation facilities.designed<br />

WHEREAS,<br />

serve the handicapped also serve the able-bodied; and<br />

to<br />

the Governor's Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

WHEREAS,<br />

of the State of Washington, following study<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

existing conditions, finds that unnecessary architectural<br />

of<br />

transportation barriers are impeding the handicapped in<br />

and<br />

their potential as creative and productive individ-<br />

realizing<br />

in our society;<br />

uals<br />

227


THEREOSE, your Memorialists respectfully pray that<br />

NOW,<br />

Congress enact legislation expanding assistance to<br />

the<br />

solve th transportation needs of handicapped people.<br />

IT RESOLVED, That copies of this memprial be immediately<br />

BE<br />

to the HonorableRichard M. Nixon, President<br />

transmitted<br />

the United States, the President of the United States<br />

of<br />

the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and<br />

Senate,<br />

each member of Congress from the State of Washington.<br />

Registry for the Blind<br />

has been proposed that the blind in Washington State be<br />

It<br />

so that they might know of governmental services to help<br />

registered,<br />

them.<br />

few people, even professional people, know the services<br />

So<br />

to them through state and private sources.<br />

available<br />

young married people have defectivechildren because<br />

Many<br />

mother has a viral disease in the first trimester of the pregnancy.<br />

the<br />

this happens some of them flee like wounded animals, and hide the<br />

When<br />

in some back room. Their anguish immobilizes them. They feel<br />

child<br />

ashamed. The handicapped child languishes.<br />

such parents, of course, facethe problem and seek<br />

Other<br />

and therapeutic assistance. Their children, even with a<br />

diagnostic<br />

have a chance to grow to be self-supporting, happy, self-<br />

defect,<br />

adults.<br />

respecting<br />

importance of S.B..472 is that the blind children and<br />

The<br />

who are catastrophically disabled will be identified. A coun-<br />

those<br />

skilled in working with the blind can offer help to the parents<br />

selor,<br />

these children. When the cause of the blindness is explained, the<br />

of<br />

will have their guilt feelings assuaged. Constructive activ-<br />

parents<br />

can be offered the parents. Optimism can come again,<br />

ities<br />

numbers involved under this bill are not large. Only<br />

The<br />

6,000 blind are in the state. Most of these about already known<br />

are<br />

the Services for the Blind of Public Assistance. Support for this<br />

to<br />

comes because it is probable that more blind infants and children<br />

bill<br />

be reported to rehabilitation services for the blind. If they<br />

will<br />

be helped early, in their first few years, they can become healthy,<br />

can<br />

responsible people.<br />

bill passed the Senate in 1969 but died in the House of<br />

The<br />

The bill as it passed the Senate is as follows;<br />

Representatives.<br />

228


1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 472<br />

of Washington By Senators Ridder, Holman,<br />

State<br />

Regular Session Grelve and Marquardt<br />

41st<br />

first time February'lT, 1969 and referred to Committee on MEDI-<br />

Read<br />

DENTISTRY, PUBLIC HEALTH, AIRANDJWATER POLLUTION.<br />

CINE,<br />

AN ACT Relating to blind persons; establishing a register of blind<br />

persons in the state of Washington to provide for the manda-<br />

tory reporting of information concerning such persons; and<br />

adding new sections to chapter 26, Laws of 1959 and to chap-<br />

ter 74.16 RCW.<br />

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:<br />

NEW SECTION. Section i. There is added to chapter 26, Laws<br />

of 1959 and to chapter 74.16 RCW a new section to read as follows:<br />

The director of the department of public assistance shall es-.<br />

tablish and maintain a register of blind persons residing in the<br />

state of Washington. Such register, shall, under regulations pre-<br />

scribed by the director of the department of public assistance, pro-<br />

vide information of such nature as will or may be of assistance in<br />

the planning of improved facillties and services fo{ blind persons<br />

and in the restoration and conservation of sight.<br />

NEW SECTION, Sec. 2. There is added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />

1959 and .to chapter 74.16 RCW a new section to read as follows:<br />

Each<br />

(i) health, educational, and social service agency or instltu-<br />

tion operating in the state of Washington and having in its care or<br />

custody, either full or part time, or rendering service to, any blind<br />

person;<br />

(2) physician or osteopath licensed or registered by the<br />

state of Washington who has in his rofessional care for diagnosisor<br />

treatment such a person; and<br />

optometrist licensed by the state of Washington who,'<br />

(3)<br />

course of his practice of optometry, ascertains that a person the i<br />

22-9<br />

ESB 472


7<br />

8<br />

10<br />

II<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

3O<br />

31<br />

32<br />

blind; shall report in writing to the director of the department of<br />

publlc assistance, the name, age, and residence o£ such person and.<br />

such addltionalinformation pertaining to blindness-as the .director<br />

may, by regulation, require for incorporation In the register re-<br />

ferred to in section 1 Of this act.<br />

NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. There is added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />

1%59 andto chapter 74.16 RCW a new section to read as follows:<br />

The register of blind persons and report submitted pursuant<br />

to section 2 of this act shall not be open to public inspection. The<br />

director may make available in the form ofstatlstlcal abstracts or<br />

information contained in such register and reports if the<br />

digests<br />

of persons referred to in such'register or report is not<br />

identity<br />

disclosed in such abstracts or digests.<br />

NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. There is• added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />

1959 and to chapter 4.16 RCW a new section to read as .follows:<br />

For the purposes of •this act the term "blind person" means,<br />

and the term "blind" refers to, a person who (a} is totally blind,<br />

(b} has impaired vision of not more than 20/200 visual acuity in the<br />

better eye and for whom vision cannot be improved to better than.<br />

20/200, or (c} who has loss of vision due wholly orin.part to im-<br />

palrment of fleld vision or to other factors which affect the useful-<br />

ness of vision to a llke degree.<br />

SECTION. Sec. 5. There is added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />

NW<br />

and to chapter 74.16 RCW a new sectlon to read•as follows:<br />

1959<br />

Any person who in good faith makes a report pursuant to this<br />

act or pursuant to any regulationpromulgated under the authority<br />

of this act,sha11 not, by reason thereof, be personally liable in<br />

damages.<br />

ESB 472<br />

230


National Re.ha.ilitation Asoiation<br />

Ntiona! Rehabilitation Association has a 43-year<br />

TNe<br />

of service to the handicapped and those who serve them. The<br />

history<br />

voluntary rehabilitation organization in the country, it has<br />

oldest<br />

a leader in the development of the concept of rehabilitation and<br />

been<br />

promoting voluntary and public programs to rehabilitate the handi-<br />

in<br />

The Journalof. Rehabilitation contains many helpful articles.<br />

capped.<br />

for this organization has been weak on the West<br />

Support<br />

and in mountain states. The state vocational rehabilitation<br />

Coast<br />

which are recognized as most productive are in the South and<br />

programs<br />

the East Coast. These states support the NRA best of all. The<br />

on<br />

Northwest is last in the nation in such support. Greater<br />

Pacific<br />

in the work of the National Rehabilitation Association<br />

participation<br />

the part of professional staff members of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

on<br />

have a mutually helpful effect.<br />

would<br />

Job Development and Placement<br />

Nation's Manpower Programs," a position paper by the<br />

"The<br />

Manpower Policy Task Force, dated January 7,1969, has been<br />

National<br />

by the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

considered<br />

position paper describes a number of the efforts of the United<br />

This<br />

Government in terms of their impact on manpower. It is assumed<br />

States<br />

vocational rehabilitation services have a strong manpower compo<br />

that<br />

nent.<br />

copy of the Donald Dabelstein Memorial Lecture presented<br />

A<br />

October 1968, at the National Rehabilitation Association meeting<br />

in<br />

NewOrleans by Paul M. Ellwood, Jr., M.D., entitled Manpower<br />

in<br />

as a Public Market was considered by the Planning<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

at a meeting in December 1968. This description of voca<br />

Commission<br />

services as being in the manpower field has<br />

tionalrehabilitation<br />

the stand taken by the Commission concerning the Executive<br />

influenced<br />

of the State Government.<br />

Reorganization<br />

has been proposed that the State of Washington have an<br />

It<br />

called the State Department of Manpower and Industry, composed<br />

agency<br />

the present Departments of Employment Security, Labor &nd Industry,<br />

of<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation. This suggestion was made by a non-<br />

and<br />

group considering all aspects of executive reorganization<br />

partisan<br />

state government. The committee was headed by Dean Brewster C.<br />

of<br />

of the Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Washing-<br />

Denny<br />

Seattle. The bill to create the Department of Manpower and Ind<br />

ton,<br />

was sent by executive request to the Legislature. At the<br />

Industry<br />

of this writing it has passed the House of.Representatives and<br />

time<br />

being considered by the Senate, with vocational rehabilitation<br />

is<br />

deleted from the bill and only the Employment Security Depart-<br />

services<br />

ment and Labor and Industry to be joined.<br />

231


following quotations from TASK FORCE ON EXECUTIVE<br />

The<br />

by Dean Brewster C. Denny, are presented:<br />

ORGANIZATION<br />

government today faces a crisis. Every year, the<br />

State<br />

played by government in our lives becomes more impor-<br />

role<br />

Relations between the. chief executive and those who<br />

tant.<br />

with him continually growmore complex. An expanding<br />

work<br />

bureaucracy increasingly impinges on areas once<br />

federal<br />

the primary responsibility of the state. Govern-<br />

thought<br />

machinery that functioned well enough in a simpler<br />

mental<br />

is no more adequate to cope with today's complex<br />

time<br />

problems than is an abacusin the age of the computer.<br />

Task Force has sought in its study of the structure<br />

This<br />

state government to identify specific problems impeding<br />

of<br />

capacity of the executive.branch of state government<br />

the<br />

meet its expanding and changing responsibilities and to<br />

to<br />

solutions which can be promptly implemented. At<br />

propose<br />

same time we have attempted to design a strategy by<br />

the<br />

the organizational structure of state government can<br />

which<br />

to be improved in order to keep our government<br />

continue<br />

to the changing needs of the people of the State<br />

responsive<br />

Washington.<br />

of<br />

have approached our task at a time when the role of<br />

We<br />

government is undergoing extensive change. At least<br />

state<br />

major factors are compelling that change. First,<br />

three<br />

state is experiencing an unparalleled explosion and<br />

the<br />

of its population accompanied by rapidly<br />

concentration<br />

service demands which often make today's plans<br />

increasing<br />

tomorrow. Second, a major change in the quality<br />

obsolete<br />

the character of service demands upon the state is<br />

and<br />

And third, a revolutionary and still changing<br />

occurring.<br />

in intergovernmental relations between federal, state<br />

role<br />

and local government is taking place.<br />

one at this time can predict with precision what role<br />

No<br />

will ultimately play in the complex, evolving<br />

government<br />

intergovernmental relations now developing.<br />

patternsPof<br />

it is evident that if state government is to<br />

Nevertheless,<br />

as a vital and significant force in society it can<br />

survive<br />

longer retain the rather static and fixed character<br />

no<br />

it has traditionally projected. Change has become<br />

that<br />

order of the day and state government must become an<br />

the<br />

for change flexible, innovative and capable<br />

instrument<br />

anticipating and responding to the needs and problems<br />

of<br />

of the people.<br />

state government has played a major and often<br />

Traditionally<br />

role in the delivery of a large variety of services<br />

dominant<br />

within its borders. Despite the expansion of federal programs<br />

232


the demands of local goyerrm.ent o.geter authority<br />

and<br />

ust be assued tt stake government will continue to<br />

$.t<br />

a major source of services-and a major factor in the<br />

Be<br />

and the coordination of such new-programs as may<br />

planning<br />

evolve so long as it is able to perform effectively.<br />

roadblocks to effective management of the state's<br />

The<br />

are many. At the heart of these is the simple<br />

business<br />

that the Governor is not the boss. While most of the<br />

fact<br />

of this state think of the Governor as chief<br />

residents<br />

of all the agencies of state government and hold<br />

executive<br />

responsible for their effective administration, in fact<br />

him<br />

is in no real sense the chief executive of approximately<br />

he<br />

of the executive functions of state government.<br />

one-half<br />

other areas, although he has some executive responsibili<br />

In<br />

he does not have the authority and administrative tools<br />

ties,<br />

associated with the chief executive of a major<br />

traditionally<br />

or the chief executive of the United States<br />

corporation<br />

whose office the office of Governor most closely<br />

Government,<br />

parallels,<br />

authority is divided among eight other independently<br />

Executive<br />

officials over whom the Governor has no control. The<br />

elected<br />

is effectively insulated from having anappropriate<br />

Governor<br />

voice in a number of vital areas of state government<br />

policy<br />

which transportationis one major.example. He has little<br />

of<br />

say about recruitment, development and assignment of the<br />

to<br />

executives of state government. He lacks effective<br />

key<br />

over the administrative operations of the state's<br />

influence<br />

functions. At the present time 28 major depart-<br />

personnel<br />

and agencies report either directly to the Governor<br />

ments<br />

through commissions. In addition, in excess of 60 other<br />

or<br />

and commissions function within state government.<br />

boards<br />

of these manage line operations and many of them have<br />

Some<br />

policy-making functions.. While the Governor<br />

significant<br />

many of these commissioners and board members and<br />

appoints,<br />

expect to have access to him when they want it, he often<br />

they<br />

relatively little influence over their actions.<br />

has<br />

these kinds of limitations, responsive and responsible<br />

With<br />

is made exceedingly difficult. With the rapid<br />

government<br />

of events and the ever accelerating rate of change within<br />

pace<br />

America, we no longer have the luxury of time<br />

contemporary<br />

once may have been the case. The need for coherent<br />

which<br />

efficient administration and a greatly improved<br />

planning,<br />

system for the delivery of services is clearly evident.<br />

Task Force has considered the goals of our organiza-<br />

This<br />

studies to be:<br />

tional<br />

233


i. To make state government more responsive to the people.<br />

To create the too].s whereby the state's business may<br />

2.<br />

managed and necessary services delivered economically,<br />

be<br />

efficiently and effectively.<br />

To allow the policies of the Governor and the legis-<br />

3.<br />

to be executed more directly and more expeditiously.<br />

lature<br />

To secure able leadership in key state offices and to<br />

4.<br />

competent performance at all levels of state<br />

encourage<br />

government.<br />

To maximize the capacity of state government to make a<br />

5.<br />

contribution to the beneficial development of<br />

creative<br />

citizens and to the preservation and improvement of<br />

its<br />

quality of their environment.<br />

the<br />

seeking to attain these broad goals we have focused on<br />

In<br />

issues as the authority of the Governor to appoint the<br />

such<br />

managers andpolicy makers within state govern<br />

principal<br />

the alignment of like functions within the same depart-<br />

ment,<br />

provision for adequate manpower ments, andthe of<br />

reduction<br />

number of persons reporting directly to the Governor.<br />

the<br />

adopted, our proposals would consolidate seven entities<br />

If<br />

the human resources sphere of state government into two;<br />

in<br />

in the transportation sphere into one; three having<br />

seven<br />

control functions into one; three agencies within<br />

pollution<br />

Governor's Office into one, plus a new line agency;<br />

the<br />

would merge two separate personnel structures.<br />

and<br />

recommend the consolidation of the functions of the Depart<br />

We<br />

of Employment Security,.the Department of Labor and<br />

ment<br />

and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of<br />

Industries<br />

Coordinating Council on Occupational Education into a<br />

the<br />

Department ofManpower and Industry.<br />

mission of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />

The<br />

also receives much of its funding from the federal<br />

which<br />

was originally oriented towards the rehabilitat-<br />

government<br />

of persons with physical handicaps. Over a period of<br />

ing<br />

the rehabilitation eligibility standards have been<br />

years<br />

so that now the rehabilitation program can be<br />

broadened<br />

as a highly flexible tool in the attack upon the pro-<br />

used<br />

of the hard core unemployed, law offenders and the<br />

blems<br />

physically or<br />

socially disabled.<br />

can be argued with some justification that the Vocational<br />

It<br />

program should be placed within the Depart-<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

of Social and Health Services. Our rationale for<br />

ment<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation in the Department of<br />

including<br />

234


and Industry is that rehabilitation is a "man-<br />

Manpower<br />

function in that its goal is to restore people to<br />

power"<br />

roles in society. Actually, Vocational Rehabili-<br />

productive<br />

stands somewhat in the center between a health<br />

tation<br />

and a manpower service. Its treatment methods are<br />

welfare<br />

allied with the health and social work fields, its<br />

closely<br />

result with employment. Therefore, it could probably<br />

end<br />

with equal but different logic to either the Department<br />

go<br />

Social and Health Services or to the Department of<br />

of<br />

and Industry. Federal approval will be required<br />

Manpower<br />

the consolidation being proposed here, but preliminary<br />

for<br />

indicates that suchapproval can be obtained.<br />

inquiry<br />

is apparent that a close working relationship will be<br />

It<br />

between the proposed Department of Social and Health<br />

required<br />

and the Department of Manpower and Industry. At<br />

Services<br />

community level integrated field service operations<br />

the<br />

the two departments should be encouraged. Often<br />

between<br />

will be essential. By reducing six agencies to two,<br />

this<br />

community-level coordination as well as communi.<br />

effective<br />

in Olympia between the departments and with the<br />

cations<br />

Governor should be significantly enhanced.<br />

should be emphasized that in recommending a Department<br />

It<br />

Manpower and Industry and a Department of Social and<br />

of<br />

Services, we havein mind changes far more signifi-<br />

Health<br />

than merelyshifting boxes into new diagrammatic<br />

cant<br />

These changes are only a means for creating<br />

relationships.<br />

greatly improved system for the delivery and deployment<br />

a<br />

state services that will maximize the development and<br />

of<br />

of our state's human resources. This, of course, will<br />

use<br />

time, but by promptly implementing our recommended<br />

take<br />

the conservation of the human resources in our<br />

changes,<br />

communities can be more effectively pursued now.<br />

235


CHAPTER Vl<br />

THE COMPOSITE WORKING PLAN<br />

FOR SERVICES TO THE HANDICAPPED AND DISADVANTAGED<br />

responsibility of the Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

A<br />

was to devise a plan to serve all the handicapped and<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

in Washington State with vocational rehabilitation ser-<br />

disadvantaged<br />

by 1975. It would seem easy enough to devise such a plan if<br />

vices<br />

money could be spent for enough staff members to do the job.<br />

enough<br />

plan to rehabilitate the handicapped and disadvantaged was to<br />

This<br />

that adequate appropriations would be made. Money was to be<br />

assume<br />

object. However, federal funding subsequent to the initiation f<br />

no<br />

planning project has increased only gradually. An evolutionary<br />

the<br />

in rehabilitation services becomes possible under this funding,<br />

growth<br />

it would seem a re___volutionary increase in services is needed.<br />

but<br />

needs to be a quantum jump in rehabilitation funding annually<br />

There<br />

1975 if a substantial number of the handicapped and disadvantaged<br />

to<br />

to be provided rehabilitation services. The nation's preoccu-<br />

are<br />

with an Asiatic war precludes attention to this worthy domestic<br />

pation<br />

issue.<br />

The Size of the Problem<br />

to the study was a determination of the number of<br />

Basic<br />

people living in the statewho might profitably receive<br />

handicapped<br />

rehabilitation services. Figures on the incidence and<br />

vocational<br />

ofhandicapping conditions are given in some detail in<br />

prevalence<br />

present report, REHABILITATION ADVANCE PLANNING TO SERVE THE<br />

the<br />

AND DISADVANTAGED. The planned distribution for the<br />

HANDICAPPED<br />

will place it in major libraries of the state where it will<br />

report<br />

as a reference source for those interested in the study.<br />

serve<br />

crucial figure, the number of new clients expected<br />

The<br />

be eligible, feasible and interested in vocational rehabilitation<br />

to<br />

each year, is 37,500. One third of these, or 12,500, are<br />

services,<br />

disabled people whose disability is a crippling condition,<br />

physically<br />

blindness, cerebral palsy, deafness, or amputation, or a disease<br />

or<br />

as heart condition, epilepsy, diabetes, or arthritis.<br />

such<br />

237


addition to physically disabled people it is expected<br />

In<br />

25,000 mentally ill, alcoholics,mental retardates, public<br />

that<br />

and socially disadvantaged individuals might be referred<br />

offenders<br />

for vocational rehabilJ.tation services.<br />

annually<br />

of the first tasks of the staff of the Planning Commission<br />

One<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation was to determine th number of handicapped<br />

for<br />

disadvantaged people in the State of Washington. One of the first<br />

and<br />

that was done was to contact state agencies in order to find the<br />

things<br />

of duplicated and unduplicated people served by the Division of<br />

number<br />

Rehabilitation and other state agencies.<br />

Vocational<br />

trying to determine precisely how many individuals known<br />

In<br />

Rehabilitation were also known to Public Assistance, Special Educa-<br />

to<br />

Department of Institutions, Employment Security Department, and<br />

tion,<br />

Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, the State Department of Health,<br />

the<br />

State Office of Economic Opportunity, the State Veterans Rehabili-<br />

the<br />

Council and the like, we were frustrated. This frustration was<br />

tation<br />

because of lack of cooperation, butbecause of the various ways<br />

not<br />

are kept for the several agencies. Some of these state agencies<br />

records<br />

record, and some do not record, the social security number, the date<br />

do<br />

birth, disability, if any, and the like. Some filing is done by<br />

of<br />

district, or county, or other region rather than for the state<br />

school<br />

a whole.<br />

as<br />

is evident that a new system of case identification is<br />

It<br />

by state agencies. This new system should be one that most<br />

needed<br />

agencies could use, would be inexpensive, would be one that would<br />

state<br />

confidentiality, and would be one that could be used at the<br />

preserve<br />

centers now. There continues to be discussions by state<br />

multi-service<br />

about data processing andconfidentiality.<br />

officials<br />

a data bank had information about handicapped people which<br />

If<br />

be derived from a number Of different sources, then services to<br />

would<br />

handicapped could be planned more skillfully. It is expected that<br />

the<br />

rehabilitation services can be provided at less cost if the<br />

better<br />

numbersof the handicapped weremore accurately known.<br />

THE COW,MISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

a single system of case identification be used by all the<br />

That<br />

helping agencies.<br />

state


Financin$<br />

37,500<br />

feasible and interested potential new clients<br />

Eligible,<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation in the year 1975<br />

12,500<br />

disabled<br />

Physically<br />

people<br />

of total clients<br />

1/3<br />

25,000<br />

ill, alcoholics, mental<br />

Mentally<br />

public offenders,<br />

retardates,<br />

disadvantaged<br />

socially<br />

2/3 of total clients<br />

the service number determined, the Commission's role<br />

With<br />

one of recommending changes that would improve and expand the<br />

became<br />

services and establish new ones. An immediately apparent<br />

existing<br />

is a substantial increase in funding to reach the very large num-<br />

need<br />

of persons in need but not presently served. Total appropriations,<br />

ber<br />

and state, in 1975, would have to be increased about nine times<br />

federal<br />

the money appropriated per year for the 1969-1971 biennium. Appro-<br />

over<br />

of the magnitude of $i00 million to $120 million per year<br />

priations<br />

be required if Vocational Rehabilitation serves the estimated<br />

will<br />

eligible, feasible and interested potential new clients of<br />

37,500<br />

Rehabilitation in Washington State in 1975. And even this<br />

Vocational<br />

might prove inadequate in supplying the large number of handi-<br />

figure<br />

in Washington State with the skilled services needed to make<br />

capped<br />

employable.<br />

them<br />

in dollars from the federal government to the State of<br />

Aid<br />

vocational rehabilitation program is assumed to be unlimited,<br />

Washington's<br />

insofar as the planning project specifications are concerned,<br />

years gone by the federal share of Section 2 funds seemed<br />

In<br />

as the State of Washington reverted an average of $1.3 million<br />

ample,<br />

for the five fiscal years ending in 1967, due to lack of state<br />

annually<br />

funds or third party matching contracts.<br />

appropriated<br />

present situation seems different. Federal funds assigned<br />

The<br />

vocational rehabilitation are far from adequate. The 1968 Voca-<br />

to<br />

Rehabilitation Act Amendments changed the matching formula for<br />

tional<br />

of these funds from 75 percent federal, 25 percent state and local,<br />

most<br />

80 percent federal, 20 percent state and local. It would seem that<br />

to<br />

greater amounts would be assigned for the handicapped and disad-.<br />

much<br />

in Washington State. However, the increase from 3/4 to 4/5<br />

vantaged<br />

share was not funded in President Johnson's budget for fiscal<br />

federal<br />

70.and President Nixon further reduced the national appropriation<br />

year<br />

for this period from $524 to $471 million.<br />

request<br />

"239


pays as well as costs. For the individual<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

is unemployed because of a disability the program may provide<br />

who<br />

which make him self-supporting. The state and local taxes<br />

services<br />

by the rehabilitated person are soon equivalent to the entire<br />

paid<br />

amount spent upon him.<br />

state has a special obligation to try to rehabilitate<br />

The<br />

who are dependent upon it and/or one of its political subdivisions.<br />

those<br />

individual receiving public assistance, or Social Security disabil-<br />

-The<br />

payments, or aid to the needy blind, or services from the Depart-<br />

ity<br />

of Institutions consumes many thousands of dollars of governmental<br />

ment<br />

over the course of several years. It makes good sense to provide<br />

money<br />

a one-time expenditure to rehabilitate such a person into self-support.<br />

services can remove disabled public assistance<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

from welfare rolls. Even if conservative estimates of costs<br />

clients<br />

benefits are made, this is still a sound social investment. Both<br />

and<br />

and welfare recipients would benefit from a greatly expanded<br />

taxpayers<br />

rehabilitation program for this group.<br />

clients need more and better evaluative services than<br />

Welfare<br />

have received in the past. In particular, more counselor inter-<br />

they<br />

with client, family, and employer are needed to "see" the client<br />

views<br />

his total environment; and more medical, psychological, and other<br />

in<br />

to assess his overall status. This may be the key to rehab-<br />

procedures<br />

greater numbers Of these clients, for accurate diagnosis is<br />

ilitating<br />

both in selecting those who can profit from services and in<br />

essential<br />

the services each client needs to become self-sustaining.<br />

choosing<br />

coordination of services and strong emphasis on pre-<br />

Proper<br />

as many clients as possible to become self-sustaining are very<br />

paring<br />

important.<br />

services for younger clients give a higher return than<br />

While<br />

older ones, all age groups up to 55-60 can be served with assurance<br />

for<br />

those rehabilitated will return social benefits at least several<br />

that<br />

the cost.<br />

times<br />

rather than supportive services give the greatest<br />

Corrective<br />

returns and should be emphasized, along with training<br />

cost-benefit<br />

designed to remedy deficiencies uncovered by evaluation.<br />

Planning Commission believes that for better planning,<br />

The<br />

information about the number of disabled persons in the state<br />

better<br />

is essential.<br />

THE COISSION RECOENDS:<br />

the Department of. Planning and Community Affairs. (or its<br />

That<br />

agency) in cooperation with the Division of Vocational<br />

successor<br />

240.


the Departments of Health, Institutions, Public<br />

Rehabilitation,<br />

and Employment Security, and the Regional Medical<br />

Assistance<br />

Program:<br />

expand studies to identify the handicapped in<br />

I.<br />

state;<br />

the<br />

study private and voluntary organizations as<br />

2.<br />

as state organizations which provide services<br />

well<br />

to these handicapped;<br />

determine the number of disabled who seek services<br />

3.<br />

are rejected for these services; and<br />

who<br />

reconend the allocation of staff to serve fully<br />

4.<br />

disabled people.<br />

all<br />

AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

expenditures, both federal and state, be increased so<br />

That<br />

rehabilitation services may take a .significant step<br />

that<br />

meeting the needs of increased numbers of disabled<br />

toward<br />

disadvantaged people.<br />

and<br />

has been hampered both by lack of funds and an<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

to spend all the federal and state funds appropriated to<br />

inability<br />

the handicapped in Washington State. An average of $1.3 million<br />

serve<br />

year reverted to the federal government unspent in the five years<br />

per<br />

ending in fiscal 1967.<br />

handicapped people are served in the state, per i00,000<br />

Fewer<br />

than in the rest of the United States. The chart below<br />

population<br />

Washington ranked as the 49th state last year in the number of<br />

shows<br />

rehabilitated per i00,000 population. An effort must be made<br />

persons<br />

increase the rehab±litants here. The f±scal year 1969 rehabilita-<br />

to<br />

figures for Washington State are fortunately much improved over<br />

tion<br />

recent years' figures.<br />

U, S, Tot&/<br />

of persons rehabilitated per 100,000 population, by reii0n and state; and rank<br />

Number<br />

state, 196h-1968<br />

by<br />

RehabtlitaCed per 100,000<br />

Reston<br />

pOl,Ulationl/<br />

and<br />

Scats 1968 1967 966 1965<br />

Washiuton 57 57 44 42<br />

year. Bureau of the Census Series P-25.<br />

241<br />

Rank<br />

36 49 41 48 44 46


States<br />

Rank<br />

by<br />

4.44<br />

Guam<br />

Arkansas 4.31<br />

2<br />

West Virginia 4.02<br />

3<br />

South Carolina 3.94<br />

4<br />

5 Georgia 3.66<br />

Alabama 3.60<br />

6<br />

Vermont 3.05<br />

7<br />

Wyoming 2.82<br />

8<br />

Oklahoma 2.80<br />

9<br />

i0 Wisconsin 2.54<br />

Colerado 2.52<br />

II<br />

Mississippi 2.50<br />

12<br />

Rhode Island 2.47<br />

13<br />

North Carolina 2.47<br />

14<br />

15 Utah 2.43<br />

Pennsylvania 2.38<br />

16<br />

Arizona 2.32<br />

17<br />

Florida 2.31<br />

18<br />

Louisiana 2.28<br />

19<br />

20 Minnesota 2.24<br />

2.07<br />

21,Virginia<br />

Maryland 2.07<br />

22<br />

Iowa 2.05<br />

23<br />

Hawaii 2.02<br />

24<br />

25 South Dakota 2.00<br />

Alaska 1.94<br />

26<br />

Tennessee 1.92<br />

27<br />

Virgin Islands 1.91<br />

28<br />

Missouri 1.91<br />

29<br />

30 Washington 1.80<br />

District of Columbia 1.77<br />

31<br />

Delaware 1.77<br />

32<br />

Oregon 1.75<br />

33<br />

Nebraska 1.75<br />

34<br />

35 Puerto Rico 1.72<br />

Texas 1.72<br />

36<br />

Montana 1.71<br />

37<br />

North Dakota 1.70<br />

38<br />

Kentucky 1.69<br />

39<br />

40 Illinois 1.53<br />

Nevada 1.53<br />

41<br />

California 1.50<br />

42<br />

Massachusetts 1.48<br />

43<br />

New York 1.42<br />

44<br />

45 Michigan 1.41<br />

New Jersey 1.36<br />

46<br />

Idaho 1.34<br />

47<br />

1.24<br />

48Maine<br />

Connecticut 1.19<br />

49<br />

50 New Mexico 1.16<br />

Ohio 1.02<br />

51<br />

New Hampshire .97<br />

52<br />

Kansas .94<br />

53<br />

Indiana .65<br />

54<br />

Capita Expenditures for Vocational Rehabilitation in 1968<br />

Per<br />

and State Funds)<br />

(Federal<br />

(Amount in Dollars)<br />

0 60 1.20 1.80 2.40 3.00 3.60 4.20 4;80<br />

1.88<br />

National<br />

Averag.e3<br />

S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Rehabilitation<br />

U.<br />

Administration. STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY<br />

Services<br />

DATA FISCAL YEAR 1968. p. 24.<br />

PROGRAM<br />

241(a)


cost per case in Washington State and in the national<br />

The<br />

rehabilitation program as a whole has been increasing<br />

vocational<br />

faster than the inflation. Vocational rehabilitation services,<br />

even<br />

costs, have been rising far faster in recent years than the<br />

hospital<br />

of most other items. It is not realistic to expect to reverse<br />

cost<br />

trend; it is practical to expect to slow it. Specialization is<br />

this<br />

way to decrease the cost per case. The use o case aides and<br />

one<br />

personnel in rehabilitation discussed in a previous section,<br />

clerical<br />

is another.<br />

WASHINGTON DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL RENABILITATION PROGRAM<br />

CASES CLOSED REHABILITATED: 1963 1968<br />

Year Appropriation Number / Average Cost Per Rehab 2/<br />

Fiscal<br />

Jne 30 Expended Rehab'd State U.S. Average<br />

Ending<br />

$ $<br />

$<br />

1,935,337 1503 1,287 996<br />

1963<br />

1964 2,082.984 1355 1,537 1,113<br />

1965 2,312,808 1478 1,565 1,143<br />

1966 3,164,136 1564 2.023 1,385<br />

1967 4,320,436 1957 2'208 1,750<br />

1968 5,630,353 1855 3,035 1,816<br />

for the number rehabilitated are from Annual Reports of the<br />

Figures<br />

They differ from figures in Federal reports because they<br />

Division.<br />

cases rehabilitated by state funds and therefore not reported<br />

include<br />

the Federal matching program.<br />

in<br />

Section 2 funds only.<br />

Personnel to do the Job<br />

clientele of Vocational Rehabilitation are the catastro.<br />

The<br />

physically disabled, the mentally and emotionally handicapped,<br />

phically<br />

the socioculturally deprived. Whatkind of staff member-is able<br />

and<br />

help these people to productive worthwhile lives? These agents of<br />

to<br />

who are most effective in their jobs are described as having<br />

change<br />

warmth, and genuineness. They are not necessarily those who<br />

empathy,<br />

advanced academic training, and who relate well to authority<br />

have<br />

Some changes in personnel practices may need revision.<br />

figures.<br />

242


expanding program will need additional staff. Will the<br />

An<br />

be able to meet the strong competition for qualified personnel?<br />

program<br />

Could present staff be used to better advantage?<br />

recruitment practices are needed. Staff development<br />

Vigorous<br />

for all levels of personnel, education lave, released time<br />

programs<br />

for professional growth help to hold employees after recruitment.<br />

Training Programs<br />

and information programs for present and potential<br />

Training<br />

of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation were the subject<br />

employees<br />

a number of recommendations by the Planning Commission. Also in-<br />

of<br />

was a recommendation that employees with related and similar<br />

cluded<br />

in other state departments be part of this training.<br />

responsibilities<br />

were made for the following training programs.<br />

Recommendations<br />

For presentemp!oyees. The Commission recommended<br />

(i)<br />

continuation of present orientation and in-<br />

the<br />

training programs and the initiation of new<br />

service<br />

for the Division's field rehabilitation coun-<br />

ones<br />

to keep them informed through demonstration<br />

selors<br />

and visits to facilities within the state<br />

seminars<br />

the problems faced by clients with heartdisease,<br />

of<br />

stroke and other severely disabling conditions.<br />

cancer,<br />

Commission also recommended that greater efforts<br />

The<br />

made to recruit staff members who have received<br />

be<br />

training in rehabilitation counseling. Present<br />

formal<br />

members, they proposed, should beoffered such<br />

staff<br />

training on a part-time basis or by correspondence.<br />

third recommendation in this category was that an<br />

A<br />

series of training programs be expanded and<br />

intensive<br />

financed for .personnel at all levels within<br />

adequately<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

the.<br />

For emplo ees in related service prosrams The Com-<br />

(2)<br />

recommended that joint training sessions, con-<br />

mission<br />

by the State Department of Personnel, be made<br />

ducted<br />

to state employees whose basic roles in the<br />

available<br />

professions are similar. Such trainingwould<br />

helping<br />

for, but not limited to, rehabilitation counselors,<br />

be<br />

security counselors, public assistance case-<br />

employment<br />

public health nurses, probation and parole<br />

workers,<br />

officers.<br />

For potentialemployees. The Commission recommended<br />

(3)<br />

information conferences and meetings be held for<br />

that<br />

high school and college students to introduce them to<br />

243


Sabbatical Leave<br />

and career opportunities available in voca-<br />

training<br />

rehabilitation,<br />

tional<br />

second recommendation was that undergraduate programs<br />

A<br />

vocational rehabilitation be instituted in our state<br />

in<br />

colleges and universities.<br />

third .recommendation in this field was that training<br />

A<br />

for non-college bound youth be established to<br />

programs<br />

them for para-professional positions in rehab-<br />

prepare<br />

ilitation.<br />

leaves are an accepted personnel practice in public<br />

Sabbatical<br />

private agencies and should be considered for the management per-<br />

and<br />

of the rehabilitation agency in Washington State. Those individ-<br />

sonnel<br />

who have been in the same job for six years should be offered an<br />

uals<br />

to trade positions temporarily for a three-month period<br />

opportunity<br />

longer with their colleagues in similar positions in other states.<br />

or<br />

staff members would, in effect, trade Jobs for a given period.<br />

These<br />

would both find the exchange renewing. On returning to their<br />

They<br />

posts, Washington Vocational Rehabilitation employees would<br />

regular<br />

back information about policies in other states which might be<br />

bring<br />

in this state. While away they would be able to offer infor-<br />

considered<br />

in the other state about commendable programs in this state.<br />

mation<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

sabbatical leaves for management personnel in vocational<br />

That<br />

be instituted.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

Manasement Stud<br />

consulting firm in Massachusetts has been employed to study<br />

A<br />

practices in rehabilitation agencies in many states. Such<br />

management<br />

study, never before done by an outside consulting firm, is timely<br />

a<br />

1969, since the State Director of Vocational Rehabilitation since<br />

in<br />

E. M. Oliver, has announced his retirement in the autumn of this<br />

1945,<br />

Harbridge House, Incorporated, of Boston, Massachusetts .is one<br />

year.<br />

such consulting firm. .<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

there be maintained a continuing evaluation of the manage-<br />

That<br />

practices of the vocational rehabilitation agency in<br />

ment<br />

State and that a nationally recognized consultig<br />

Washington<br />

be used for this purpose.<br />

firm<br />

244


Record Keeping<br />

in the record keeping practices for the Vocational<br />

Improvements<br />

program are needed. True, the rehabilitation agency<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

using computers a few years ago but much of the demographic<br />

started<br />

about client characteristics has not been available for study.<br />

data<br />

is recommended that factor analysis of client characteristics be<br />

It<br />

and that trends in client services be studied. The basic<br />

undertaken,<br />

from the R-300 reporting form on each client should be stored for<br />

data<br />

as needed in studies. Casework statistics are needed for<br />

retrieval<br />

program management. Present efforts of the agency to secure<br />

sound<br />

information for managerial purposes should be continued.<br />

statistical<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

increased efforts should also be made to computerize<br />

That<br />

data and develop informationretrieval processes.<br />

client<br />

Coordination and Cooperation Among Asencies Better Patterns of Service<br />

Government<br />

government, a first priority is the reorganization of<br />

In<br />

Rehabilitation services into the Department of Social and<br />

Vocational<br />

Services. Such reorganization it is believed would result in<br />

Health<br />

improved system of delivery of services to the disabled, one which<br />

an<br />

provide services at less cost than is possible under the present<br />

would<br />

structure.<br />

administrative<br />

secretary of the State Department of Social and Health<br />

The<br />

would be able to mandate to his subordinates that they coor-<br />

Services<br />

their efforts in a better way than has been possible heretofore.<br />

dinate<br />

example if a person in prison has family members receiving help<br />

For<br />

the Department of Public Assistance it is difficult for all pro-<br />

from<br />

workers touching the individual to be in communication with<br />

fessional<br />

other. The persons leaving prison may be assigned a parole officer<br />

each<br />

a vocational rehabilitation counselor. He is likely to find<br />

and<br />

to task force reports, that the interagency coordination<br />

according<br />

these departments leaves much to be desired. If the officer<br />

between<br />

the counselor were in the same agency their efforts in behalf of<br />

and<br />

parolee would certainly be more firmly joined.<br />

the<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation services be placed in the State<br />

That<br />

of Social and Health Services, or a similar agency<br />

Department<br />

which the Legislature would create.<br />

245


sharing of in-service training programs within the<br />

The<br />

department complex would achieve a goal which is the subject<br />

larger<br />

of the following recommendation,<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOENDS<br />

since the basic role of persons in some helping professions<br />

That<br />

similar, part of the training programs for new employees and<br />

is<br />

training programs for those in state employment should<br />

in-service<br />

together. Those training together would be rehabilitation<br />

be<br />

employment security counselors, public assistance<br />

counselors,<br />

probation and parole officers, public health nurses,<br />

caseworkers,<br />

the like. This part of the training could be done under the<br />

and<br />

Department of Personnel.<br />

State<br />

cooperation with the State Department of Institutions<br />

Close<br />

be required for the following recommendations adopted by the<br />

would<br />

Commission.<br />

THE COMMISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />

services to the hospitalized mentally ill should be so<br />

That<br />

that by 1975 all patients below the age of 60 would<br />

expanded<br />

referred to Vocational Rehabilitation routinely, with<br />

be<br />

screening to exclude those not feasible for vocational<br />

later<br />

rehabilitation services.<br />

Rehabilitation should also work with thosewho.<br />

Vocational<br />

the intellectually retarded seek self-support. Many retardates<br />

help<br />

state schools can be helped with the proper facilities. These<br />

in<br />

are small ones in population centers. Both supporting staff<br />

usually<br />

student body members are carefully selected from the larger popu-<br />

and<br />

lation.<br />

retarded.<br />

The 1969 State Legislature authorized group homes for the<br />

THECOMMISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />

Vocational Rhabilitation cooperate with the Departmen t of<br />

That<br />

in the establishment and support of group living<br />

Institutions<br />

homes for the mentally retarded.<br />

number of retarded in the state is estimated as more<br />

The<br />

30,000. Facilities, schools, and staff to meet their needshave<br />

than<br />

been inadequate. Responsibility for-services to. this severe%y<br />

always<br />

segment of our population is shared by a number Of st.-<br />

handicapped<br />

agencies.<br />

246


public offenders are often offended by society.<br />

So-called<br />

their punishment by fine or jail or .prison they usually return<br />

After<br />

society. Few prisoners are offered rehabilitation services now.<br />

to<br />

potential of juvenile offenders for a long life of crime is great,<br />

The<br />

yet few are known to rehabilitation.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

the Division of .Vocational Rehabilitation work with the<br />

That<br />

law enforcement and other co,unity resources in the<br />

courts,<br />

of rehabilitation programs for offenders and<br />

development<br />

offenders, and that those in need of vocational<br />

potential<br />

rehabilitation services, should be served.<br />

AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

there should be an expansion of services to the persons<br />

That<br />

prisons and other correctional institutions so that by<br />

in<br />

all prisoners below the age of 60 would be referred to<br />

1975<br />

Rehabilitation routinely, with later screening<br />

Vocational<br />

exclude those not feasible for vocational rehabilitation<br />

to<br />

services.<br />

mployment Evaluation and Service Centers for the Disadvantaged<br />

evaluation and service centers are recommended<br />

Employment<br />

the three principal cities of Washington State Seattle, Tacoma,<br />

for<br />

Spokane. Operated by Vocational Rehabilitation these centers<br />

and<br />

be so planned that their principal service would be to the dis-<br />

would<br />

advantaged and handicapped clients of several agencies.<br />

the centers a diagnostic study would determine whether<br />

At<br />

individual is disadvantaged,whether he has an employment handicap,<br />

an<br />

whether he needs rehabilitation services. The thorough diagnostic<br />

and<br />

would examine pertinent psychological, vocational, educational,<br />

study<br />

medical, social and environmental factors which bear on the<br />

cultural,<br />

to employment. The services provided would<br />

individual'shandicap<br />

the individual's pattern of work behavior and occupational<br />

appraise<br />

The center envisioned would have on its staff representative<br />

skills.<br />

from the several social and health services agencies, and<br />

members<br />

manpower agencies such as the Department of Labor and Industries,<br />

from<br />

the Employment Security Department. Working together in a team<br />

and<br />

backedby the resources of their individual agencies, these<br />

approach,<br />

members would be able to solve many of the vocational problems<br />

staff<br />

the severely disabled client.<br />

of<br />

THE GO9ISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

state funds be appropriated for employment and evaluation<br />

That<br />

centers, operated by the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

service<br />

of the State of Washington, to serve the disadvantaged<br />

agency<br />

and near Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma.<br />

in<br />

247


Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center<br />

of the most powerful combinations of services for the<br />

One<br />

physically disabled person is found in the comprehensive<br />

severely<br />

center. Such a center combines training, medical care,<br />

rehabilitation<br />

care, counseling and guidance in one etting. Although<br />

residential<br />

are several of these centers in the United States meeting the<br />

there<br />

definition forsuch a facility, none is west of Arkansas.<br />

federal<br />

of our crippled who now languish a£ home on welfare can be made<br />

Many<br />

through the services of such a comprehensive center,<br />

self-supporting<br />

neighboring States of Oregon and Alaska have asked that Washington<br />

Our<br />

a regional comprehensive rehabilitation center. Nine-tenths<br />

develop<br />

of the cost of such a center would be paid by the federal government.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

state funds be appropriated for a regional comprehensive<br />

That<br />

center in the State of Washington.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

Multi-Service Centers<br />

program recommended for Washington State also reflects<br />

Another<br />

Commission's concern that resources of the state be readily avail-<br />

the<br />

for the handicapped person seeking help. This is their recom-<br />

able<br />

below regarding multi-service centers. In such a center the<br />

mendation<br />

helping services of government are housed together. The<br />

principal<br />

is able to go easily from one agency to another. He realizes<br />

client<br />

that his several counselors are likely to be in communication.<br />

Seattle Multi-Service.Center, located at 2315 S. Jackson<br />

The<br />

houses a number of social service agencies. The Division of<br />

Street,<br />

Rehabilitation has been represented there since February,<br />

Vocational<br />

in an office manned at first by a single vocational rehabilitation<br />

1968,<br />

and secretary. Midway through the 1969 Fiscal Year a rehabili<br />

officer<br />

aide and a clerical worker were added, and in the spring of 1969<br />

tation<br />

a second vocational rehabilitation officer joined the crew.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

state, and other government and private agencies providing<br />

That<br />

for the handicapped be housed in multi-service centers<br />

services<br />

the state where it can be demonstrated that better<br />

throughout<br />

for the people can be provided. A city like Seattle<br />

services<br />

have several such centers, one in each major neighborhood.<br />

would<br />

plan would be developed so that such agencies now housed<br />

A<br />

would be brought together as soon as leases expire<br />

separately<br />

existing buildings. It would be helpful if health care<br />

on<br />

were contiguous to this center,<br />

facilities<br />

248


Th__e Dr. H. T. Buckner Rehabi li tation Gente_r _ In°red Woren Seattle<br />

Buckner Rehabilitation Center of the State Department<br />

The<br />

Labor and Industries, located in Seattle, serves injured workmen.<br />

of<br />

individuals are provided services in this facility if their<br />

These<br />

is such that they cannot be helped in settings closer to<br />

condition<br />

homes. Payment for services comes from a fund to which the<br />

their<br />

and his employer both contribute. It has been proposed that<br />

worker<br />

industrial accident victims be referred for rehabilitation ser-<br />

more<br />

vices.<br />

THE COW, MISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

an illustrated brochure be prepared tailored toward<br />

That<br />

employer, physician, attorney and insurance carrier<br />

the<br />

the services of vocational rehabilitation as<br />

describing<br />

relate to workmen's compensation.<br />

they<br />

AND FU,RTHER THE COMMISSION RECONDS:<br />

a reporting procedure be devised useful to the screening<br />

That<br />

evaluation of industrially injured cases that could benefit<br />

and<br />

by vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

Coordination with Education<br />

has had an intimate association with various<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

of education from the time it was initiated, In most states<br />

levels<br />

rehabilitation services started in State Departments of<br />

vocational<br />

Only in recent years has there been a strong trend to remove<br />

Education.<br />

rehabilitation program from the direct sponsorship of education.<br />

the<br />

rehabilitation has in the past, and must continue in the<br />

However,<br />

future, its close ties with education..<br />

educational institutions with which vocational rehabili-<br />

The<br />

has most often been connected in the past are the special educa-<br />

tation<br />

programs in the K-12 program, the community colleges, the private<br />

tion<br />

schools, the special education schools operated by the state<br />

vocational<br />

the blind, the deaf, the retarded, and the mentally ill. The<br />

for<br />

Development Center of the University .of Washington has much to<br />

Child<br />

offer vocational rehabilitation.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

vocational rehabilitation services be made available to<br />

That<br />

secondary level special education student.<br />

every<br />

we accept the view that every student enrolled in a<br />

If<br />

education class is handicapped, no effort while this child is<br />

special<br />

school seems too great if it will diminish his handicap and develop<br />

in<br />

potential for successful living. The Commission's recommendation<br />

his<br />

249


efers particularly to the special education student. In 1968<br />

above<br />

one-tenth of these students were involved in the Division's<br />

only<br />

Cooperative School Program.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

the area of overlap between the schools and Vocational<br />

That<br />

be.carefully studied in order to more clearly<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

roles and agree on responsibilities for services to<br />

define<br />

handicapped.<br />

the<br />

AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

each special education client served by the school and<br />

That<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation have a curriculum that is tailored<br />

by<br />

his needs with the best combination of academic instruction,<br />

to<br />

adjustment training and on-the-job experience.<br />

work<br />

AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation accept handicapped high school<br />

That<br />

as early as age 14 in order to provide prevocational<br />

students<br />

guidance and counseling as well as other appropriate services.<br />

Rehabilitation and Health<br />

physicians and health agencies rank second only<br />

Hospitals,<br />

welfare agencies in the number of referrals made to thevocational<br />

to<br />

program. The present working relationship between the<br />

rehabilitation<br />

and the medical professions is regarded as a close and satis-<br />

program<br />

one. Liaison is achieved by the medical director with the<br />

factory<br />

profession, and a unique working arrangement whereby public<br />

medical<br />

officers serve as local medical consultants for vocational<br />

health<br />

officers in their districts and help to carry informa-<br />

rehabilitatio.n<br />

tion about rehabilitation services into the profession.<br />

health planning will touch most aspects of<br />

Comprehensive<br />

delivering rehabilitation services. An exchange of informa-<br />

programs<br />

tion between the two programs should be maintained.<br />

need for more hospital beds has been stressed by Justus<br />

The<br />

Lehmann, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation<br />

F.<br />

of Washington, Seattle. The average hospital stay of a<br />

University<br />

group of stroke patients with severe involvement, he found,<br />

selected<br />

approximately 30 days. Based on this finding, he proposed that<br />

was<br />

should be at least one rehabilitation bed per 5,000 population.<br />

there<br />

Hill Burton Hospital construction program provides more generously<br />

The<br />

one bed per 2,000. Using Dr. Lehmann's figure as the more realis-<br />

for<br />

the number of rehabilitation beds in the Seattle area alone needs<br />

tic,<br />

be increased from the 1968 total of 81 to a projected 240 by 1972.<br />

to<br />

Medicine and ancillary staff need to be provided to serve the cardiac<br />

250


stroke and other patients in these beds.<br />

recommendation concerning rehabilitation counselors would<br />

A<br />

members of the professional staff to acquire greater competency<br />

help<br />

in health services.<br />

THE CO4ISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

an orientation and training program be initiated and<br />

That<br />

for rehabilitaton counselors to inform them through<br />

continued<br />

seminars and visits to facilities within the<br />

demonstration,<br />

of the problems faced by clients with heart disease,<br />

state<br />

cancer, stroke and other severely disabling conditions.<br />

AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

vocational rehabilitation use personnel to contact people<br />

That<br />

with the handicapped to increase awareness of the<br />

working<br />

rehabilitation programs in the state. The abilities<br />

vocational<br />

the agency to help handicapped and disadvantaged people and<br />

of<br />

its limitations should be described.<br />

AND FURTHER THE CO4ISSION RECONDS:<br />

in addition to the training of the handicapped there is<br />

That<br />

tremendous need to train ancillary personnel: physical<br />

a<br />

therapists, occupational therapists, speech and hearing special-<br />

vocational evaluators, psychologists, administrators,<br />

ists,<br />

to staff the workshops, rehabilitation houses, and other<br />

etc.,<br />

facilities now .in existence or projected for the<br />

rehabilitation<br />

future.<br />

Seattle Artificial Kidney Center<br />

care provided at the Kidney Center is essential to<br />

Medical<br />

life of the people served there. The Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

the<br />

has been supportive of this effort, and has placed clients<br />

program<br />

the center. The Commission sees the services of the Center as<br />

in<br />

medical care rather than vocational rehabilitation services.<br />

Blind<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

in the future state funds to support kidney patients should<br />

That<br />

through the State Department of Health rather than Voca-<br />

come<br />

tional Rehabilitation.<br />

rehabilitation services for the blind and visually handi-<br />

Special<br />

should be continued. Presently offered by the Services to the<br />

capped<br />

Blind under the Department of Public Assistance these services<br />

251


in nature, should be under the administration of Voca-<br />

rehabilitative<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

tional<br />

Deaf<br />

THE COMMISSIONRECO4ENDS:<br />

transfer should be made of the vocational rehabilitation<br />

That<br />

of Services to the Blind from the Department of Public<br />

aspects<br />

Assistance to Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

training is a requirement for professional coun-<br />

Special<br />

who work with the deaf. The low percentage of cases in the<br />

selors<br />

caseload of the rehabilitation program must be indicative<br />

present<br />

some failure of the program to meet these needs.<br />

of<br />

Counselors with communication skills are needed and<br />

More<br />

be brought into the program.<br />

should<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

state-supported nursery schools and home therapy services<br />

That<br />

established for the deaf, hard-of-hearing and language-<br />

be<br />

de layed child.<br />

people who are blind are granted an extra income tax<br />

The<br />

by the Internal Revenue Service. The deaf, who are equally<br />

exemption<br />

have no exemption. If the blind have an extra income<br />

handicapped,<br />

exemption, so should those who are deaf.<br />

tax<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

Congress explore income tax exemptions for various<br />

That<br />

of the handicapped,<br />

categories<br />

Migrant Workers<br />

farm workers are mong the most abused and<br />

Migrant<br />

segments of society. They are most apt to be ignorant,<br />

handicapped<br />

sick, non-productive. Services to them could improve the health<br />

poor,<br />

society as well as their own. As a group, migrant farm workers<br />

of<br />

most in need of literacy training, consumer protection, decent<br />

are<br />

health care, services to family members, and training in<br />

housing,<br />

proper spending of their earnings.<br />

THE COM#$ISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation efforts be<br />

That<br />

to serve migrant farm workers and that federal grants<br />

expanded<br />

should be sought to help support such enhanced services.<br />

252


Indians<br />

are the most disabled ethnic group in the State of<br />

Indians<br />

They are lowest of all in income, in education and in<br />

Washington.<br />

care. They are the most deprived socially of all in the state.<br />

health<br />

has been recommended that they be provided with a better chance for<br />

It<br />

vocational success.<br />

THE COM#$ISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation develop more<br />

That<br />

of delivering vocational rehabilitation<br />

effectivemethods<br />

to.handicapped Indians. Indians should be recruited<br />

services<br />

staff members counselors, aides, clerical assistants<br />

as<br />

work with the reservation Indians and other concentrations<br />

to<br />

Indians.<br />

of<br />

Labor Organizations<br />

citizens of our state are active members of labor<br />

Many<br />

These unions were early and strong supporters of rehabili-.<br />

unions.<br />

tation agencies.<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

relationships among unions, employers, and Vocational<br />

That<br />

be strengthened. Vocational rehabilitation<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

should have easy access to.potential rehabilitation<br />

counselors<br />

and to the supporting data, and should collaborate<br />

candidates<br />

union representatives, others associated with the union's<br />

with<br />

of services, and representatives of management, such<br />

network<br />

shop foremen. A team composed of representatives from the<br />

as<br />

center (if there isone), theunion, and Vocational<br />

health<br />

can function as a steering group for all rehab-<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

activity.<br />

ilitation<br />

AND aOMMZSSION R eO NDS:<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation develop procedures that will<br />

That<br />

employers and labor unions to make early referrals to<br />

enable<br />

Rehabilitation of employees who have drinking and<br />

Vocational<br />

problems that affect their performance or behavior on<br />

other<br />

the job.<br />

knowledge and use of the union power structure<br />

Systematic<br />

communication channels are necessary ifthis is to be accomplished.<br />

and<br />

the leadership publicizes and legitimizes rehabilitation services<br />

When<br />

its members, the membership will respond,<br />

among<br />

253


THE PUBLIC SERVED<br />

members of Vocational Rehabilitauion should be aware<br />

Staff<br />

social changes and their own role in these changes.<br />

of<br />

rehabilitation program started with .clients who were<br />

The<br />

orthopedically handicapped. These people wanted and were pro-<br />

most].y<br />

vocational training to help overcome their handicap. The men-<br />

vided<br />

ill, the mentally retarded, the public offender, the socially<br />

tally<br />

the alcoholic, and other major groups of disabled people<br />

disadvantaged,<br />

excluded from these services at first by law. Afterwards they<br />

were<br />

excluded by custom. Only recently, and reluctantly, has the pro-<br />

were<br />

worked with these groups of handicapped people.<br />

gram<br />

started out to be a program to provide services to<br />

What<br />

motivated individuals in need of training has changed substan-<br />

well<br />

It was implied in the beginning that clients had all the<br />

tially.<br />

Boy Scout virtues--trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly,<br />

traditional<br />

kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and rever-<br />

courteous,<br />

In contrast at this time we find that many of our clients are<br />

ent.<br />

and dirty, deceitful and irresponsible, without gratitude. They<br />

mean<br />

actively or passively thwart efforts to make themselves self-<br />

either<br />

supporting.<br />

is the clientele with which the rehabilitation counselor<br />

This<br />

The courageous and the cowardly, the deficient and the defeated<br />

deals.<br />

among the deserving disabled, disadvantaged, and deprived who<br />

are<br />

their way to his door. Many of them will meet eligibility require-<br />

make<br />

for service. For those accepted by the program, the rehabili-<br />

ments<br />

process can offer services designed to help them reach an optimum<br />

tation<br />

level of self-sufficiency, self-reliance and self-supporto<br />

respond differently to a handicap, probably be-<br />

Individuals<br />

of their interactionwith society. Some are strengthened by<br />

cause<br />

try harder than most, emphasize their assets, attempt to<br />

adversity,<br />

in life despite.the handicap. Others do the opposite. Society<br />

succeed<br />

is beginning to reward the better attributes of the handicapped.<br />

and others who have worked in rehabilitation<br />

Counselors<br />

that the services provided result in a number of secondary gains<br />

know<br />

the individual. Efforts to make the rehabilitation client employ-<br />

for<br />

result in a number of other gains. First of all, his own.con-<br />

able<br />

is usually restored. His worth in the eyes of his family and<br />

fidence<br />

is enhanced. He is looked upon favorably by potential employers.<br />

friends<br />

he becomes a self-respecting, self-supporting law-abiding citi-<br />

Soon<br />

of his community. The secondary gains often outweigh the primary<br />

zen<br />

just as the return to the government in taxes outweighs the<br />

ones,<br />

of rehabilitation services.<br />

costs<br />

rehabilitation staff member working with the handicapped<br />

The<br />

has many more resources than were available a few years ago.<br />

today<br />

He is liable to have even more resources by 1975. Not only are<br />

254


care resources improved; education has made great strides in<br />

medical<br />

years. The proliferation of community colleges which provide<br />

recent<br />

basic education beyond the high school is one example. Educa-<br />

good<br />

is nearly universal now. With programmed instruction and other<br />

tion<br />

teaching techniques it is rapidly getting much better.<br />

the best example of an improvement in rehabilitation<br />

Probably<br />

is the change.in governmental structure. The delivery system<br />

services<br />

rehabilitation services in the Stateof Washington differs from<br />

of<br />

of two years ago. Other important improvements are expected.<br />

that<br />

coordination will be made mandatory by reorganization in<br />

Interagency<br />

state and in the nation. Particularly in the cities and towns where<br />

the<br />

centers for the delivery of government services are being<br />

multi-service<br />

we should expect a reduction in the gaps in service to<br />

established,<br />

a reduction in the duplication of services, and a<br />

handicapped.people,<br />

more economical and more dependable delivery of services,<br />

quicker,<br />

need for vocational rehabilitation services is great.<br />

The<br />

program falls far short of reaching the 37,500 handicapped and<br />

The<br />

disabled who, it is estimated, could benefit annually from services.<br />

need for greater appropriations more services, and<br />

The<br />

staff has been stressed, The achievement of goals envisioned<br />

improved<br />

the Commission in its study requires the concerned involvement of<br />

by<br />

and of lay and professional organizations in our communities.<br />

citizens,<br />

these potential supporters of the program of their<br />

Informing<br />

in the helping services is the responsibility of the Vocational<br />

roles<br />

Rehabilitaton agency.<br />

THECOMMISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation in its involve-<br />

That<br />

in community action planning for services in poor neigh-<br />

ment<br />

arrange for poor people themselves to participate in<br />

borhoods<br />

planning.<br />

the<br />

AND FURTHER, THE COmmISSION RECOMMENDS<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation work with<br />

That<br />

agencies to find means of delivering vocational rehabili-<br />

other<br />

tation and educational services in the rural areas of Washington.<br />

force members were quick to note and report from all<br />

Task<br />

of the state that the services of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

sections<br />

not well known. Some of their recommendations were directed<br />

are<br />

correcting this situation. The following are quoted from task<br />

toward<br />

force reports.<br />

255


and<br />

the Division employ personnel to contact physicians<br />

"...that<br />

other professionals working with the handicapped to increase<br />

and<br />

awareness of the Vocational Rehabilitation program."<br />

the Division develop a more comprehensive public<br />

"...that<br />

program."<br />

information<br />

How Shall Services be Delivered?<br />

placement of the vocational rehabilitation agency in<br />

The<br />

government•is a factor which determines to a degree the efficacy<br />

state<br />

extensiveness of the services to be delivered. The State Planning<br />

and<br />

is on record as recommending that the agency be placed in<br />

Commission<br />

social service complex under one of the reorganization plans proposed<br />

a<br />

1968 by the Governor's Task Force on Executive Organization. First<br />

in<br />

of the Task Force was placement of the agency in a manpower<br />

choice<br />

which would consolidate the functions of the Employment Security<br />

complex<br />

the Department of Labor and Industry, and the Vocational<br />

Department,<br />

agency, a recommendation which was qualified by the<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

"it can be argued with some justification that the Voca-<br />

statement,<br />

Rehabilitation program should be placed within the Department<br />

tional<br />

of Social and Health Services."<br />

legislation introduced in the 1969 session of the<br />

Other<br />

Legislature proposed the creation of a Department of Vocational<br />

State<br />

Rehabilitation with a director appointed by the •Governor.<br />

1975, a safe prediction seems to be that•the Division<br />

By<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation, under the administration of the Coor-<br />

of<br />

dinating Council for Occupational Education will no longer exist.<br />

the larger social service complex the Commission could<br />

In<br />

see benefits to the•rehabilitation program, when operation<br />

accruing<br />

were mandated by the agency head to insure coordination<br />

procedures<br />

services and full working cooperation with other units of the<br />

of<br />

agency. Hopefully, this would result in a stronger affirma-<br />

larger<br />

of•the rehabilitation philosophy and could be accomplished with-<br />

tion<br />

damage to the unique and individual services which characterize<br />

out<br />

rehabilitation program.<br />

the<br />

the final months of the project the Commission was<br />

During<br />

up in a maze of legislative indecision and indifference. Pro-<br />

caught<br />

legislation which might have resulted in new administrative<br />

posed<br />

died in the Senate Rules Committee, after having passed the<br />

patterns<br />

House of Representatives nd one Senate Committee.<br />

256


A Needed Assessment of the Federal Program<br />

one sense the role of the Planning Commissions for Voca-<br />

In<br />

Rehabilitation in the several states was preempted by the publi-<br />

tional<br />

in January 1968, of a ll5-page REPORT OF TE NATIONAL CITIZENS<br />

cation<br />

COMMITTEE ON VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION. They said it all and<br />

ADVISORY<br />

well. Their assessment of vocational rehabilitation and their<br />

very<br />

are all that is needed at the federal level. The idealism<br />

remedies<br />

the practicality they have shown could lead vocational rehabilita-<br />

and<br />

for the decade of the 70's. Howard A. Rusk, M.D., the Director<br />

tion<br />

the Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York City, was the<br />

of<br />

No person from Washington State served as a member of this<br />

chairman.<br />

committee.<br />

Report contains criticisms of the Federal Vocational<br />

The<br />

establishment, criticisms difficult for a state rehabili-<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

agency to make. There seems to be little federal involvement<br />

tation<br />

control of--the State of Washington's Vocational Rehabilita-<br />

in--and<br />

program, although about 80 percent of all the funds come from<br />

tion<br />

sources.<br />

federal<br />

administrators of the Vocational Rehabilitation program<br />

The<br />

Washington State and in other states, have asked for simplified<br />

of<br />

programs and regulations with appropriations made far enough<br />

federal<br />

advance for orderly expenditures by state and local agencies.<br />

in<br />

cuts in vocational rehabilitation federal appropriations<br />

Substantial<br />

during a fiscal year for that fiscal year, can have a damaging<br />

made<br />

A number of state agencies including Washington State's,<br />

effect.<br />

damaged catastrophically by such a reduction in federal appro-<br />

were<br />

in 1968. Dependable amounts of appropriations should be<br />

priations<br />

at least six months prior to the beginning of a fiscal year<br />

announced<br />

the expenditures are to be made in a prodent and frugal way. It<br />

if<br />

too much to expect a state agency to be responsible fiscally if<br />

is<br />

thefederal appropriations are made too late for sound planning.<br />

W. Gardner was Secretary of Health, Education, and<br />

John<br />

at the time the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />

Welfare<br />

was authorized. In another context he recently said, "We are<br />

tation<br />

clever at avoiding self-examination." People legitimately<br />

enormously<br />

change which institutions often stubbornly resist, The rehab-<br />

demand<br />

agencies in the United States are in a context where .the<br />

ilitation<br />

rush of change brings a kind of instant antiquity.<br />

Reuben J. Margolin, Ed.D., in a January 1968 article said:<br />

is nothing wrong with admitting our inadequacies and<br />

There<br />

our professions could be enhanced greatly by remedying<br />

that<br />

deficiencies. The fact that we have them does not<br />

these<br />

the reality of the important contributions we are<br />

alter<br />

making to the rehabilitation of the disabled. When we<br />

257


complete satisfaction with our performance, our<br />

express<br />

potential and correspondingly our potential for<br />

learning<br />

clients becomes somewhat limited. Dissatisfaction<br />

assisting<br />

at the very heart of the professional growth process,<br />

is<br />

it we cannot maintain or increase our competence.<br />

Without<br />

contends that dissatisfaction with .existing conditions<br />

Miel<br />

seems to be a prerequisite for intentional change.<br />

growth of the rehabilitation programs in the several<br />

The<br />

and state agencies is related to the successes rehabilitation<br />

federal<br />

had and the expectation that more rehabilitation services will<br />

has<br />

our handicapped people with some solutions to their problems.<br />

provide<br />

Again, quoting from John Gardner, NO EASY VICTORIES:<br />

modern belief that man's institutions can accomplish<br />

The<br />

about anything he wants, when he wants it, leads to<br />

just<br />

certain characteristic contemporary phenomena.<br />

is the bitterness and anger toward our institutions<br />

One<br />

well up when high hopes turn sour. No observer of the<br />

that<br />

scene has failed to note the prevalent cynicism<br />

modern<br />

all leaders, all officials, all social institu-<br />

concerning<br />

That cynicism iscontinually fed and renewed by<br />

tions.<br />

rage of people who expected too much in the first place<br />

the<br />

and got too little in the end.<br />

Why the Emphasis on Vocational Rehabilitation?<br />

numerous ways we have learned that work isimportant.<br />

In<br />

is a statement in Spanish on the wall of the East Los Angeles,<br />

There<br />

Multi-Service Center, "Trabago honesto, justamente recom-<br />

California,<br />

This is translated as, "Honest work, justly rewarded."<br />

pensado."<br />

general assembly of theUnited Nations proclaimed The<br />

The<br />

Declaration o__fHuman Rights. Article 23 of this declara ---<br />

Universal<br />

tion is as follows:<br />

23. (i) Everyone has the right to work, to free<br />

Article<br />

of employment, to just and favourable conditions<br />

choice<br />

work and to protection against unemployment.<br />

of<br />

Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right<br />

(2)<br />

equal pay for equal work.<br />

to<br />

Everyone who works has the right to just and favour-<br />

(3)<br />

remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an<br />

able<br />

worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if<br />

existence<br />

by other means of social protection.<br />

necessary,<br />

Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions<br />

(4)<br />

by the protection of his interests.<br />

his Presidential Address to Division 22 (Psychological<br />

In<br />

of Disability) of the American Psychological Association<br />

Aspects<br />

delivered in San Francisco on September i, 1968, Walter S. Neff, of<br />

.258


New York University said:<br />

is quoted as rmnarking that the two most vital human<br />

Freud<br />

are the ability to love and the ability to work,<br />

functions<br />

of course he wrote many volumes on he former and<br />

but<br />

nothing on the latter. His example has been followed<br />

almost<br />

all major theorists of personality, whose chief pre-<br />

by<br />

has been with the demands of interpersonal<br />

occupation<br />

intimacy, rather than with the demands of work.<br />

the Second Bill of Rights of President Franklin D. Roose-<br />

In<br />

below, he begins with employment. It was important in our culture<br />

velt,<br />

then and it is now.<br />

have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights<br />

under which a new basis of security and prosperity can<br />

We<br />

established for all-regardless of station, race, or creed.<br />

be<br />

theseare:<br />

Among<br />

right to a useful and remunerative ob in the industries<br />

The<br />

ShOl or farms or mines of the Nation;<br />

or<br />

right to earn enough to provide adequate food and<br />

The<br />

and recreation;<br />

clothing<br />

right of every farmer to raise and sell his product at a<br />

The<br />

which will give him and his family a decent living;<br />

return<br />

right of every businessman, large and to trade in<br />

The<br />

atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and<br />

an<br />

by monopolies at home.or abroad;<br />

domination<br />

right of every family to a decent home;<br />

The<br />

right to adequate medical care and the oppommity to<br />

The<br />

and enoy good health;<br />

achieve<br />

right to adequate protection from the economic fears<br />

The<br />

old age siclmess, accident,, and unemployment;<br />

of<br />

The right to a good education.,99<br />

creates new problems. Working together with new<br />

Progress<br />

and new tools we seek better solutions.<br />

knowledge<br />

Will Disab.i.Lit y Rates Rise or Diminish?<br />

general protective laws are implemented, it is hoped<br />

As<br />

there will be less disability, therefore, less of a need to<br />

that<br />

259


disabled people. If a practical way could be devised<br />

rehabilitate<br />

encourage young people not to begin smoking tobacco, such as a<br />

to<br />

on advertising of tobacco products, there would be a great reduc-<br />

ban<br />

soon in emphysema, cancer, heart disease, and tuberculosis.<br />

tion<br />

we have general affluence and general education, there<br />

As<br />

be a reduction in mental retardation, as Rodger L. Hurley, stated,<br />

will<br />

in POVERTY AND MENTAL RETARDATION A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP:<br />

widespread prejudice and ignorance often cloud<br />

This<br />

clear fact that poverty in America is one of the<br />

the<br />

significant causes of mental retardation. It<br />

most<br />

to retardation far beyond the more publi-<br />

contributes<br />

damaged believed done by heredity or unontroZabl<br />

cized<br />

suffered by prominent, prosperous families.<br />

accidents<br />

poor endure the tragedy of mental retardation because<br />

The<br />

their poverty to a much greater degree than any other<br />

of<br />

class. The majority of the mentally retarded<br />

socio-economic<br />

the children of the more disadvantaged classes of our<br />

are<br />

society.<br />

way to reduce the need for vocational rehabilitation<br />

Another<br />

would be to reduce the job related accidents. In a Labor Day<br />

services<br />

article, in the New York Times entitled, Industrial Accidents,<br />

1968<br />

PERSONS ARE DISABLED ON JOB THAN IN MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISIONS,<br />

MORE<br />

Howard A. Rusk, M.D., stated:<br />

they bring death so dramatically, automobile<br />

Because<br />

make the headlines, but few of us realize<br />

accidents<br />

accidents on the job.cause more disabling injuries<br />

that<br />

motor vehicles.<br />

than<br />

1966, 2,200,000 persons suffered disabling injuries<br />

In<br />

work compared with 1,900,000 from motor vehicle<br />

at<br />

accidents.<br />

also comes as a surprise to most people that accidents<br />

It<br />

the job cause about i0 times as many working days away<br />

on<br />

from work as do strikes and other work stoppages.<br />

A Look at Washington Rehabilitants<br />

this time the clients of Vocational Rehabilitation in<br />

At<br />

State are similar to the clients of rehabilitation in the<br />

Washington<br />

nation as a whole.<br />

table which follows provides a description of Clients<br />

The<br />

disabling condition:<br />

by<br />

260


WASHINGTON DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM, 1968<br />

Me, or<br />

MAJOR DISABLING CONDITION IN REHABILITATED CASES<br />

Disablin$ Condition<br />

deformities and<br />

Orthopedic<br />

impairments<br />

retardation<br />

Mental<br />

character and<br />

Personality,<br />

disorders<br />

behavior<br />

illness<br />

Mental<br />

Amputation<br />

Cardiac<br />

impairment<br />

Hearing<br />

disabling conditions, visual<br />

Other<br />

speech impairments, drug<br />

and<br />

epilepsy, etc.<br />

addiction,<br />

Assistance clients with<br />

Public<br />

physical disability<br />

no<br />

by Vocational<br />

served<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Number Percent<br />

37.71<br />

610<br />

14.32<br />

232<br />

9.72<br />

157<br />

8.54<br />

139<br />

5.06<br />

82<br />

4.84<br />

78<br />

70 4.34<br />

251 15.47<br />

1,619 i00.00<br />

1,855<br />

costs for rehabilitation services in Washington State<br />

The<br />

significantly from the national norms. Nationwide, nearly eight<br />

vary<br />

of the expenditures for vocational rehabilitation services<br />

percent<br />

to specialized rehabilitation facilities. In Washington State,<br />

go<br />

there are no such facilities meeting the federal definition no<br />

where<br />

at all is spent in this way. In the case of severely handi-<br />

money<br />

clients, most of them are denied services because of the lack<br />

capped<br />

these specialized facilities. It is to be noted that Commission<br />

of<br />

have been made for special rehabilitation facilities<br />

recommendations<br />

Washington State.<br />

in<br />

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS<br />

state funds be appropriated for employment and evaluation<br />

That<br />

operated by the Vocational Rehabilitation agency of<br />

centers,<br />

.261


State of Washington. to serve the disadvantaged in and<br />

the<br />

Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma.<br />

near<br />

AND FURTHER THE COISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />

state funds be appropriated for a regional compre-<br />

That<br />

rehabilitation center in the State of Washington.<br />

hensive<br />

range of appropriations--federal, state, local--<br />

The<br />

for vocational rehabilitation in Washington State by the year<br />

needed<br />

is $i00 million to $120 million if the estimated 37,500 handi-<br />

1975<br />

and disadvantaged eligible and interested persons are served<br />

6apped<br />

annually.<br />

Region<br />

and<br />

Stae<br />

of Total Expendlturaa by Category (General Agencies)<br />

Percent<br />

Year 1967<br />

Fiscal<br />

Guidance<br />

Caae<br />

and<br />

F1aeesnt Services<br />

Sall<br />

Buslnass<br />

Enterprises<br />

Workshops<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Facilities<br />

9.5<br />

U. S. Total 4.7 0.5 1.2 7.9<br />

26.2<br />

43.3<br />

Washlnton 7,5 0.7 5,0 ,0<br />

43.5<br />

workshops in Washington State cost approximately five<br />

The<br />

of the total budget of Vocational Rehabilitation. In the<br />

percent<br />

as a whole, they receive only approximately one percent. The<br />

nation<br />

in this state have benefited from this expenditure.. They<br />

workshops<br />

been able to serve.quite well several kinds of rehabilitation<br />

have<br />

To a degree, they have taken up the slack caused by the<br />

clients.<br />

of comprehensive rehabilitation facilities again, as defined<br />

absence<br />

the Federal Rehabilitation Services Administration. The Physical<br />

by<br />

and Rehabilitation Unit of the University Hospital in Seattle,<br />

Medicine<br />

a deserved national reputation for excellence for the kinds of<br />

has<br />

services which they provide.<br />

the above chart also shows, the cost of administering the<br />

As<br />

program in Washington State is about fifty percent<br />

rehabilitation<br />

than for the nation as a whole. It may be possible to expand<br />

higher<br />

rehabilitation program in Washington State substantially without<br />

the<br />

enlargingthe present administrative staff significantly.<br />

possible way to reduce the cost of rehabilitation<br />

Another<br />

per client is to improve the delivery system of services.<br />

services<br />

262


is not easy, as Mary E. Switzer told the National Rehabilitation<br />

This<br />

meeting in New Orleans in 1968. Her statement is recorded<br />

Association<br />

an article in the Journal of Rehabilitation entitled, COORDINATION:<br />

in<br />

PROBLEM AND A PROMISE. She said:<br />

A<br />

achievement of coordination is essential in the very<br />

The<br />

and complex job of delivering services to people<br />

difficult<br />

we are tofulfill our mission and make federal, state,<br />

if<br />

local dollars--whether they be public or private--<br />

and<br />

really pay the dividends they are intended to pay.<br />

is not calculated planning and analysis alone which have<br />

It<br />

so short a time produced our present array of federal human resource<br />

in<br />

About 459 such programs are described in the annual catalog<br />

programs.<br />

federal systems programs, produced by the Office of Economic Oppor-<br />

of<br />

Coordination among them remains to be achieved. As Charles<br />

tunity.<br />

Odell, Director of the Uo S. Employment Service stated,<br />

E.<br />

number of manpower and anti-poverty programs have been<br />

A<br />

during the past eight years, which provide<br />

established<br />

to assist the disadvantaged. These include such<br />

tools<br />

as outreach, orientation and assessment, (includ-<br />

services<br />

work sample testing).coaching, counseling, basic<br />

ing<br />

occupational training, training allowances,<br />

education,<br />

assistance and relocation allowances, job develop-<br />

mobility<br />

and placement, supportive services, and follow-up and<br />

ment<br />

to assure acceptanceand adjustment on the<br />

follow-through<br />

ob.<br />

programs that provide.these services are funded from<br />

The<br />

wide variety of sources and are usually regarded as<br />

a<br />

structured programs, rather than<br />

separatevertically<br />

parts of oneover-all program. Furthermore,<br />

integral<br />

for the disadvantaged are being performed by a<br />

services<br />

different agencies, who are often competing with<br />

numberof<br />

other toassist the same client or to enlist the<br />

each<br />

of the same employer,<br />

cooperation<br />

describing the National Citizens Conference on Rehabili-<br />

In<br />

of the Disabled and Disadvantaged, to be held in the Mayflower<br />

tation<br />

in Washington, D. C. from June 24 to June 27, 1969, Secretary<br />

Hotel<br />

Health, Education, and Welfare Robert H. Finch said:<br />

of<br />

are aware that many of todayVs public and private pro-<br />

You<br />

do not meet people's needs as well as they should.<br />

grams<br />

the physically and mentally disabled, but.many<br />

Notonly<br />

Americans are handicapped in obtaining education,<br />

other<br />

training, jobs, or medical care.<br />

263


is our hope that the Conference, by bringing together<br />

It<br />

who provide services with the consumers who need<br />

those<br />

will eliminate some of the roadblocks that do exist<br />

them,<br />

stimulate action in States and communities throughout<br />

and<br />

the country.<br />

a recent article Joseph Hunt, Commissioner, Rehabilitation<br />

In<br />

Administration, described the decade of progress which ended<br />

Services<br />

the fiscal year 1968. He found much to approve of in that year.<br />

in<br />

saw the achievements of 1968 as being the result of a long period<br />

He<br />

of preparation, in his words:<br />

was accomplished in 1968 and what that accomplishment<br />

What<br />

for the future is the result of all the effort in<br />

means<br />

years. It is the result, for example of the 1943<br />

previous<br />

when the mentally disabled were made eligible for<br />

legislation<br />

it is the result of the 1954 law which gave us<br />

services;<br />

and training of personnel; it is the result of the<br />

research<br />

amendments which gave us increased federal financial<br />

1965<br />

and the new construction and improvement pro-<br />

participation<br />

grams for facilities, among other things.<br />

year 1968 was the formative year of the Rehabilitation<br />

Fiscal<br />

Administrationunder the newly organized Social and<br />

Services<br />

Service. The new agency has the purpose of<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

a unified approach to the problems of needy<br />

providing<br />

with special emphasis on the family and at the<br />

Americans,<br />

time to assure continued special emphasis upon serving<br />

same<br />

the aged, the handicapped, and children.<br />

stresses a rehabilitation philosophy within its several<br />

SRS<br />

units; .provides for better program coordina-<br />

organizational<br />

and makes a separation of payment and service functions.<br />

.tion;<br />

mission is directed at the best possible delivery of<br />

Its<br />

the community where the people who need the<br />

services.in<br />

live.<br />

help<br />

Lea__d Tim____e i__qn Staffin $<br />

potential success of the rehabilitation program in Wash-<br />

The<br />

State is also dependent upon preparation. The achievements of<br />

ington<br />

rehabilitation counselor training program at theUniversity of<br />

the<br />

are a case in point. Years of preparation are required<br />

Washington<br />

the first graduate begins helping clients in a rehabilitation<br />

before<br />

The recommendations made by the Planning Commission for<br />

agency.<br />

Rehabilitation in the field of training are likely to have<br />

Vocational<br />

but fewer immediate benefits. Staff training and<br />

longtermbenefits,<br />

retraining is time consuming and costly but is vital.<br />

264


Information GBe$ins Early<br />

the program which will take the longest of all to<br />

Perhaps<br />

its purpose would be an effort to put vocational rehabili-<br />

accomplish<br />

information in the textbooks utilized by the students studying<br />

tation<br />

in our schools. A survey of these textbooks used in the school<br />

health<br />

of the State of Washington was made by Mrs. Jean Mead, Research<br />

systems<br />

assigned to the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />

Analyst,<br />

This 1968 study of hers revealed that there is almost no<br />

tation.<br />

information about the vital rehabilitation program, even<br />

textbook<br />

in the United States the expenditure level in that year for<br />

though<br />

exceeded half a billion dollars. If rehabilitation<br />

rehabilitation<br />

can be known to junior high and high school age students,<br />

services<br />

of whom take required courses in health, then the fund of infor-<br />

many<br />

about this service would expand. The staff of the Planning<br />

mation<br />

in March 1968, asked the Rehabilitation Services Adminis-<br />

Commission,<br />

about the utilization of textbooks to inform the public about<br />

tration<br />

services. The letter ofinquiry follows:<br />

rehabilitation<br />

the statewide Planning Commission moves into communities<br />

As<br />

Washington State to study regional needs for voca-<br />

within<br />

rehabilitation through task forces, our members<br />

tional<br />

often find that very.little is known about the program,<br />

too<br />

services, purpose, general availability, etc, Dis-<br />

its<br />

on how to overcome this "knowledge gap" take off<br />

cussions<br />

many directions, lead to no specific answers, but do<br />

in<br />

a great many questions. Some of these we would<br />

generate<br />

like to field to the Federal Office.<br />

have wondered if a survey of textbooks used in secondary<br />

We<br />

and in teacher-training programs in our colleges<br />

schools<br />

universities would show information about the vocational<br />

and<br />

program in texts in the social sciences,<br />

rehabilitation<br />

physical education civics and government, and<br />

health,<br />

to name the more obvious subject fields. Do<br />

sociology,<br />

of disability, for example, refer to established<br />

discussions<br />

programs .where persons afflicted with a disability<br />

existing<br />

may find help?<br />

are wondering whether a survey of tis kind has ever been<br />

We<br />

by the Federal Office, possibly by contacting textbook<br />

made<br />

directly. Another question that comes tomind<br />

publishers<br />

whether any effort has been made t the Federal level to<br />

is<br />

information on the vocational rehabilitation program<br />

have<br />

into textbooks.<br />

put<br />

response of Ralph W. Susman, Chief, Program Planning and<br />

The<br />

Branch, was in part, as follows:<br />

Development<br />

has asked me to reply to your letter of<br />

Commissioner,Hunt<br />

27, 1968. To our knowledge the Federal Office has<br />

March<br />

265


directly communicated with textbook publishers concern-<br />

not<br />

the inclusion of any vocational rehabilitation material<br />

ing<br />

textbooks available to schools on any level. To our<br />

in<br />

no survey of the type you mentioned has ever been<br />

knowledge<br />

done.<br />

must be remembered that rehabilitation, and certainly<br />

It<br />

rehabilitation of the disabled, is a comparatively<br />

vocational<br />

field of study. As both academia and publishers become<br />

new<br />

aware of the medical, social, psychological and voca-<br />

more<br />

aspects of rehabilitation, we are sure they will wish<br />

tional<br />

include information about rehabilitation in books, maga-<br />

to<br />

and all other media used for public education. At<br />

zines,<br />

time however, inclusion of any material on rehabilita-<br />

this<br />

would be primarily dependent upon the authors of the<br />

tion<br />

textbooks and not on the publishers.<br />

various<br />

is our hope that through the Statewide planning projects<br />

It<br />

many citizens of the State on all levels, the<br />

involving<br />

of the total field and the needs within the field<br />

knowledge<br />

become more recognized, Many of the projects have a<br />

will<br />

committee studying and evaluating this "knowledge<br />

separate<br />

as you so aptly phrase it, and its relationship to the.<br />

gap"<br />

area of public relations--which in turn relates to<br />

larger<br />

acceptance or rejection of any programs by the public<br />

the<br />

sector.<br />

recommend that Rehabilitation Services Administration<br />

We<br />

members inform authors of textbooks in the social and health<br />

staff<br />

field, in psychology, social work,.political science, and<br />

services<br />

In order to have the textbooks contain information about<br />

medicine.<br />

services to rehabilitate the handicapped and disadvan-<br />

governmental<br />

a more subtle approach might also be utilized, and these books<br />

taged,<br />

written in such a way that they present the idea that a full life<br />

be<br />

economic self-sufficency are not necessarily denied the individual<br />

and<br />

a disabling physical, mental, or social condition. Efforts to<br />

with<br />

the positive .influence on the individual and on society which<br />

show<br />

rehabilitation can make to the handicapped should be pre<br />

vocational<br />

sented.<br />

Directory<br />

REHABILITATION RESOURCES DIRECTORY was published in 1964,<br />

The<br />

in 1967 as a cooperative venture of the State Department of<br />

revised<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the Office of<br />

Health,<br />

State Superintendent of Public Instruction. This kind of. publica-<br />

the<br />

tion is needed, but it is difficult to keep such a work current.<br />

order to improve the communications in the state about<br />

In<br />

governmental and non-governmental services to the handicapped,<br />

both<br />

266


should be a directory published in loose-leaf form which<br />

there<br />

these services, The services to be described should include<br />

describes<br />

provided by the major state agencies such as Institutions Public<br />

those<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation, Department of Health Employ-<br />

Assistance,<br />

Security, Labor and Industries the Judicial system, State Patrol,<br />

ment<br />

Also included would be county, city, and other local services.<br />

etc.<br />

might well be nonProfit organizations which provide services.<br />

Included<br />

would include such organizations as the Goodwill Industries,<br />

These<br />

Heart Association, United Good Neighbors, the Catholic Charities,<br />

the<br />

Vocational Services, and the like. The services offered the<br />

Jewish<br />

by the various educational institutions from the elementary<br />

public<br />

with its PTA through the multiple services of the great univer-<br />

school<br />

sities should be.included.<br />

directory should be published and kept current by the<br />

This<br />

Community Affairs and Development Agency. The book should be<br />

State<br />

to individuals likely to be called upon for advice about<br />

distributed<br />

These would include governmentworkers, counselors physicians,<br />

services.<br />

ministers, and the like, If such a directory of current<br />

teachers,<br />

were widely disseminated, people in need of services would<br />

information<br />

likely obtain those services. This.communication to the people<br />

more<br />

need, plus the recommended changes in the delivery system of govern-<br />

in<br />

services such as would be available at a multiservice center<br />

mental<br />

better assure that those needing services will be able to obtain<br />

will<br />

them.<br />

IN WASHINGTON STATE: PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

AGENCIES, was published in 1968 by the Planning Commission for<br />

STATE<br />

Rehabilitation. Also publishedin 1968 by the Planning<br />

Vocational<br />

was the DIRECTORY OF AGENCIES PROVIDING WORK TRAINING AND/OR<br />

Commission<br />

SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE.<br />

Rehabilitation Is now only one of many agencies<br />

Vocational<br />

thepopular term "rehabilitation" to describe program efforts.<br />

using<br />

other activities which.have the effect of rehabilitation upon<br />

These<br />

indiviuals served are a wholesome development. Such imitation<br />

the<br />

can be considered a compliment.<br />

almost all other agencies are subject to some<br />

However,<br />

not felt by Vocational Rehabilitation. The uniqueness<br />

limitations<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation among agencies serving disadvantaged<br />

about<br />

is described in a publication of the Council of State Admin-<br />

people<br />

of Vocational Rehabilitation, THE SATEFEDERAL VOCATIONAL<br />

istrators<br />

PROGRAM LOOKS TO THE FUTURE, in these words;<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

strength of the state vocational rehabilitation programs<br />

The<br />

a total program of services to handicapped people stems<br />

in<br />

a considerable extent from the unique qualities of the<br />

to<br />

Some of these are discussed briefly in the<br />

programs.<br />

following paragraphs:<br />

267


The vocational rehabilitation agencies are responsible<br />

i.<br />

providing vocational rehabilitation services to all<br />

for<br />

youth and adults with employment problems. In<br />

disabled<br />

a state vocational rehabilitation agency cannot ex-<br />

fact,<br />

any class of handicapped people and receive federal<br />

clude<br />

Most agencies with related programs have services<br />

funds.<br />

to a specific class of the handicapped, such as<br />

limited<br />

mentally ill, the mentally retarded, the alcoholic, the<br />

the<br />

offender, etc., or to certain age groups.<br />

Vocational rehabilitation agencies have authority to<br />

2.<br />

substantially all of the services that are needed<br />

provide<br />

evaluate the rehabilitation potential of the individual<br />

to<br />

prepare him for employment. Most agencies with related<br />

and<br />

are limited to the provision of specified services,<br />

programs<br />

as medical services, social, security benefits, voca-<br />

such<br />

training, placement, etc. The opportunity to provide<br />

tional<br />

of the services rather than a part of the services needed<br />

all<br />

help an individual achieve rehabilitation is an indispen-<br />

to<br />

element in the vocational rehabilitation process and<br />

sable<br />

contributed most substantially to the results that have<br />

has<br />

achieved. It has resulted in the development of a new<br />

been<br />

rehabilitation counseling, the skills of which<br />

profession,<br />

vocational evaluation and integration of all services<br />

include<br />

toward helping a handicapped person solve his pro-<br />

directed<br />

blems.<br />

The services of a state vocational rehabilitation agency<br />

3.<br />

available on equal terms to handicapped people in all<br />

are<br />

of. the state. Services are notdependent upon<br />

subdivisions<br />

action of localgovernmental bodies, although the coop-<br />

the<br />

of subdivisions of the state is sought; these sub-<br />

eration<br />

may contribute to the enrichment of programs for<br />

divisions<br />

own handicapped people,under conditions specified in<br />

their<br />

vocational rehabilitation plans.<br />

state<br />

Laws and regulations governing the administration of<br />

4.<br />

programs in the state are flexible, enabling<br />

rehabilitation<br />

state agency to work with related agencies in almost<br />

the<br />

waythat will expedite the rehabilitation of handicapped<br />

any<br />

Vocational rehabilitation agencies may either pro-<br />

people.<br />

services directly or purchase services from other state<br />

vide<br />

voluntary agencies or from private practitioners. For<br />

or<br />

a state agency may provide directly most counseling<br />

example,<br />

but purchase most of its medical services. This<br />

services<br />

has made it possible for these state vocational<br />

flexibility<br />

agencies to initiate cooperative agreements<br />

rehabilitation<br />

other agencies and to be innovators in developing joint<br />

with<br />

programs.<br />

268


The flexibility of funding of state vocational agency<br />

5.<br />

makes-it possible for state vocational rehabilita-<br />

programs<br />

agencies to be experimental and innovative in their<br />

tion<br />

to the provision of rehabilitation services. As<br />

approach<br />

result of this flexibility, vocational rehabilitation<br />

a<br />

have expanded rapidly in recent years, utilizing<br />

agencies<br />

methods and techniques in the provision of services,<br />

new<br />

initiating rehabilitation services to groups for whom<br />

and<br />

such services were not formerly available.<br />

first priority is to expand appropriations making voca<br />

The<br />

rehabilitation services available to all handicapped individ<br />

tional<br />

in the state by July 1975. Total appropriations, federal and<br />

uals<br />

in 1975 would have to be increased about nine times over the<br />

state,<br />

appropriated per year for the 1969-1971 biennium. Appropria<br />

money<br />

of the magnitude of i00 million to.120 million dollars per year<br />

tions<br />

be required if Vocational Rehabilitation serves the estimated<br />

will<br />

eligible, feasible and interested potential new clients of<br />

37,500<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation in Washington State in 1975.<br />

at the needs of the rehabilitation program we seem<br />

Looking<br />

see it through interlaced dollar signs. Money can add quality, and<br />

to<br />

to the service, employ the staff, expand the program. It can<br />

quantity<br />

the facilities, create new service centers, add beds to hospitals.<br />

build<br />

for brochures, for TV and radio spots it becomes the great com<br />

Spent<br />

It buys the talent for effective administration.<br />

municator.<br />

costs money, Just as seeds do. A gardener<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

for his seed with the knowledge that he will have. a return.<br />

pays<br />

view of the cost to the state of dependency the cost of<br />

In<br />

and maintaining an adequate vocational rehabilitation pro-<br />

developing<br />

would be an investment which should pay large dividends in future<br />

gram<br />

years.<br />

Planning Commission has attempted to describe as many<br />

The<br />

as possible which would improve the functioning of the rehab<br />

programs<br />

programs within the State of Washington and in the nation<br />

ilitation<br />

a whole. Modesty requires the admission that not all problems will<br />

as<br />

solved, even should our recommendations be adopted in full. In the<br />

be<br />

of Ernst Toiler, introducing a volume of his plays:<br />

words<br />

plays collected in this volume ae social dramas and<br />

The<br />

They bear witness to human suffering and to<br />

tragedies.<br />

yet vain struggles to vanquish this suffering. For<br />

fine<br />

unnecessary suffering can bevanquished the suffer-<br />

only<br />

which arises out of the unreason of humanity, out of<br />

ing<br />

inadequate social system. There must always remain a<br />

an<br />

of suffering, the lonely suffering imposed upon<br />

residue<br />

by life and death. And only this residue is<br />

mankind<br />

and inevitable, is the tragic element of life<br />

necessary<br />

of life's symbolizer, art.<br />

and<br />

269


are convinced that the good of the individual served, as<br />

We<br />

as the good of the state itself, will be benefited by attention<br />

well<br />

the recommendations of this Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

to<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

basic purpose of the Planning CommiSsion for Vocational<br />

The<br />

has been to recommend improvements in rehabilitation<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

so that more clients may be better served at a savings to society.<br />

it is that men who can organize themselves and their<br />

Why<br />

and resources to get to the moon apparently<br />

knowledge<br />

do a great many other things of equal worth and<br />

cannot<br />

urgency<br />

greater<br />

fact, the vision, skill, courage and intelligence that<br />

In<br />

gone into the space program ought to shame mankind--<br />

have<br />

Americans in particular. .Because if men can do what<br />

and<br />

astronauts and their earthbound colleagues--human<br />

the<br />

all--have done, why cannot we build the houses we<br />

beings<br />

Why must our cities be choked in traffic and the<br />

need?<br />

polluted air it produces?<br />

are our lakes and rivers so fouled by mankind that, as<br />

Why<br />

Kennedy once said, if you fall in you don't drown,<br />

Bob<br />

dissolve? Why is virtually every major city without<br />

you<br />

safe and comfortable public transportation? Why<br />

clean,<br />

our airways and airports overcrowded to the point of<br />

are<br />

Why does every effort to remove slums and rebuild<br />

scandal?<br />

cities bog down in red tape and red ink?<br />

a nation can train and organize the skilled manpower<br />

When<br />

to launch and recover Apollo, why can't it train<br />

needed<br />

employ the unskilled manpower standing hopeless and<br />

.and<br />

on the ghetto streets? Why are the transient<br />

embittered<br />

on both coasts, Indians in the West, blacks in the<br />

workers<br />

and unfortunates in every state going hungry in the<br />

South<br />

nation in the world? Is it not obscene for a nation<br />

richest<br />

conquered polio to permit pellagra and rockets?<br />

that<br />

Tom Wicker, THE NEW YORK TIMES, March 20 1969<br />

270


REFERENCES<br />

James and Walker, Evans. LET US NOW PRAISE FAMOUS MEN.<br />

Agee,<br />

Mifflin Company, c1939.<br />

Houghton<br />

Psychological Association. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 76th ANNUAL<br />

American<br />

1968. Volume 3. The Association, 1200 Seven-<br />

CONVENTION<br />

teenth N.W., Washington, D.C.<br />

Maxwell. WINTERSET. (In Representative American Plays,<br />

Anderson,<br />

H. Quinn, comp.) Appleton-Century-Crofts, c1953.<br />

A.<br />

of Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. SUPPORTIVE PERSONNEL<br />

Association<br />

REHABILITATION CENTERS. The Association in cooperation with<br />

IN<br />

Rehabilitation Research & Training Center, Pennsylvania<br />

Arkansas<br />

and Training Center. August 1967.<br />

Research<br />

AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MALCOLM X. Grove Press., c1964.<br />

Andrea, and Lurie, Jay. REPORT ON THE PREVALENCE OF DISABILITY<br />

Ayers,<br />

WASHINGTON STATE. Prepared under supervision of Jerald<br />

IN<br />

Director of Graduate Program for Vocational Rehabili-<br />

Forster,<br />

Counselors. University of Washington, Seattle. Septem-<br />

tation<br />

ber 1968.<br />

Jackson. OUR PRISONS ARE CRIMINAL. (In New York Times<br />

Bruce,<br />

September 22, 1968.)<br />

Maazine,<br />

Cairns, Fred I. PROGRESS IS UNORTHODOX. Boston, Beacon Press, c1950.<br />

Cleaver, Eldridge. SOUL ON ICE. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1968.<br />

of State Administrators Of Vocational Rehabilitation. THE<br />

Council<br />

VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM LOOKS TO THE<br />

STATE-FEDERAL<br />

A STATEMENT OF MISSION AND GOALS. The Council , 1522<br />

FUTURE:<br />

Street, N.W,, Washington, D.C.n.d.<br />

K<br />

Martin. THE INCIDENCE OF DISABILITY IN MARYLAND. Univer-<br />

Dishart,<br />

of Maryland, College of Education, August 1967.<br />

sity<br />

Robert. HANDICAPPED AMERICANS. (In Consressional Records,<br />

Dole,<br />

14, 1969)<br />

April<br />

Kurt. ESCAPE FROM CONFINEMENT. (In Journal of Rehabili-<br />

Dreifuss,<br />

Vol. 35, No. i, January-February 1969)<br />

tation,<br />

H. Wentworth. TAMING MEGALOPOLIS. Volume II. How to<br />

Eldredge,<br />

an Urbanized World. Anchor Books. 1967.<br />

Manage<br />

272


Paul M., Jr., M.D. THE REHABILITATION-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX:<br />

Ellwood,<br />

A NEW REHABILITATION MARKET. The Donald Dabelstein<br />

TOWARD<br />

Lecture. 1968 NRA Conference. (In Journal of Rehabili-<br />

Memorial<br />

Vol. 35, No. 2, March-April 1969)<br />

tation,<br />

Daniel J. INAUGURAL ADDRESS. Delivered to the Forty-first<br />

Evans,<br />

in joint session. Olympia, Washington, January 15,<br />

Legislature<br />

1969.<br />

Gardner, John W. NO EASY VICTORIES. Harper & Row, c1968.<br />

Seymour. THE REFORM OF MENTAL HOSPITALS. (In Psychology<br />

Halleck,<br />

Vol. 2, No. i0, March 1969.)<br />

Today,<br />

Donald W. COOPERATIVE SCHOOL/REHABILITATION PROGRAMS.<br />

Hamilton,<br />

Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, 1969.<br />

Typescript.<br />

Charles. THE DISCONTENT EXPLOSION IN MENTAL HEALTH. (In<br />

Hersch,<br />

Psy.cholo$ist, Vol. 23, No. 7, July 1968.)<br />

American<br />

Joseph. A DECADE OF PROGRESS. (In Journal of Rehab111tation,<br />

.Hunt,<br />

35, No. i, January-February 1969.)<br />

Vol.<br />

Donald R. ALTERNATIVES TO CONJUGAL VISITING. Typescript.<br />

Johns,<br />

Department of Institutions, Olympia, Washington, 1969.<br />

State<br />

County, Washington. Easter Seal Society. GUIDEBOOK TO SEATTLE<br />

King<br />

THE HANDICAPPED. Compiled and published by the Junior<br />

FOR<br />

of Seattle, Inc., in cooperation with the Society.<br />

League<br />

1966.<br />

Justus F. SEATTLE AREA STROKE PATIENT BED NEED. A<br />

Lehmann,<br />

medical program report. University of Washington 1968.<br />

Regional<br />

Oscar. LA VIDA: A PUER=]iT .I!ICAN FAMILY IN THE CULTURE OF<br />

Lewis,<br />

SAN JUAN AND NE Y(iIK. Random House, c1965.<br />

POVERTY<br />

Reuben J. COUNSELOR $ELF.-EXAMINATION AND CLIENT MOTIVA-<br />

Margolin,<br />

(In Professional Bulletin. Vol. VIII, January 1968.<br />

TION.<br />

National Rehabilitation Conseiing Association.)<br />

Walter S. WORK AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR. (In American Psychological<br />

Neff,<br />

Division 22 uiitin. Vol. 15, No. 3, November 1968.)<br />

Association<br />

Jersey. Department of !nstittions. POVERTY AND MENTAL RETAR-<br />

New<br />

A CAUSAL RELATIONSHiP By Rodger L. Hurley. Division<br />

DATION<br />

of Mental Retardation, !68<br />

Charles E. IMPROVING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH COORDINATION.<br />

Odell,<br />

Journal of Rehabilitatien Vol. 35, No. 2, March-April 1969.)<br />

(In<br />

273


Comprehensive Statewide Planning for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Ohio.<br />

REPORT OF THE GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON VOCATIONAL REHABILI-<br />

Services.<br />

Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation, Columbus, Ohio.<br />

TATION.<br />

1968.<br />

September<br />

Sylvia. "LATE START" PROGRAM COULD HELP ELDERLY. In Seattle<br />

Porter,<br />

August 21, 1968.)<br />

Post-Intelligencer,<br />

Commission for Observance of Human Rights Year (1968).<br />

President's<br />

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Article 23. The<br />

THE<br />

Commission, n.d.<br />

Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of<br />

President's<br />

THE CHALLENGE OF CRIME IN A FREE SOCIETY. The Commission,<br />

Justice.<br />

Washington, D.C. February 1967.<br />

THE NARCOTIC ADDICT. Report of Institute on New Devel-<br />

REHABILITATING<br />

in the Rehabilitation of the Narcotic Addict, Fort Worth,<br />

opments<br />

February 16-18, 1966. Sponsored jointly by the Division<br />

Texas,<br />

Hospitals of the U. S. Public Health, Service, Vocational<br />

of<br />

Rehabilitation Administration and Texas Christian University.<br />

Nan. DATA BANK: A THREAT TO YOUR PRIVACY? (In Sunday<br />

Robertson,<br />

York Times, January 7, 1968.)<br />

New<br />

Roosevelt, Franklin D. Second Bill of Rights. n.d.<br />

Howard A. INDUSTRIAL. ACCIDENTS. (InNewYorkTimes,.Septem-<br />

Rusk,<br />

i, 1968.)<br />

ber<br />

Edward E. A MODERN SISYPHUS GOES TO COLLEGE. Presented at<br />

Sampson,<br />

Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association,<br />

the<br />

San Francisco, California. September 1968.<br />

Clair (and others). RESEARCH METHODS IN SOCIAL RELATIONS.<br />

Selltiz,<br />

Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1959.<br />

Holt,<br />

William F. HIPPIE: BASTARD SON OF THE BEAT GENERATION, Joint<br />

Soskin,<br />

on Mental Health of Children, Inc., University of<br />

Commission<br />

California, Berkeley, December 1967.<br />

George R. NOT SO RICH AS YOU THINK. Boston, Houghton.Mifflin,<br />

Stewart,<br />

1968.<br />

Mary E. COORDINATION: A PROBLEM AND A PROMISE (In Journal<br />

Switzer,<br />

Rehabilitation, Vol. 35, No. 2, March-April 1969)<br />

of<br />

Thomas fHE CR!ME OF COMMITMENT, 6in PsychologyToday,<br />

$zasz,<br />

2, No. I0, March 1969.)<br />

Vol.<br />

274


Toiler, Ernst. SEVEN PLAYS. Liveright Publishing Corporation, c1934.<br />

S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Office of Education.<br />

U.<br />

YOUTH WE HAVEN'T SERVED A CHALLENGE TO VOCATIONAL EDUCATION.<br />

THE<br />

By Barbara Kemp. U. S. Government Printing Office, 1966.<br />

S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Social and<br />

U.<br />

Service.- Office of Research, Demonstrations,<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Training. RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATIONS BRIEFS: Vol. II,<br />

and<br />

6. Plastic surgery for public offenders, January 2, 1969;<br />

No.<br />

Vol. II, No. 8. Managing the information explosion,<br />

and<br />

3, 1969.<br />

February<br />

(State). Census Board. POPULATION FORECASTS: STATE OF<br />

Washington<br />

1965 to 1985. By Calvin F. Schmid (and others).<br />

WASHINGTON,<br />

Seattle, Washington, March 1965.<br />

(State). Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Civil<br />

Washington<br />

RACE AND VIOLENCE IN WASHINGTON STATE. Published by<br />

Disorder.<br />

Secretary of State, Olympia, Washington, 1969.<br />

(State). Department of Health. PROJECT REPORT: REHABILI-<br />

Washington<br />

EDUCATION SERVICE, January i, 1959 to December 31, 1961.<br />

TATION<br />

cooperative effort by the State Department of Health, Depart-<br />

A<br />

of Public Assistance, and the Division of Vocational Rehab-<br />

ment<br />

ilitation. Olympia, 1962.<br />

(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. 1,855<br />

Washington<br />

STORIES. An Annual Report. The Division, Olympia,<br />

SUCCESS<br />

Washington, 1968.<br />

(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. INTERIM<br />

Washington<br />

PLAN FOR WORKSHOPS AND FACILITIES, 1968. By Payson H.<br />

STATE<br />

Jeynes. The Division, September 1968.<br />

(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. SOCIAL<br />

Washington<br />

TRUST FUND PAYMENTS FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

SECURITY<br />

Prepared by Donald P. Holden. Typescript. The<br />

SERVICES.<br />

March 31, 1969.<br />

Division,<br />

(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Vocational<br />

Washington<br />

Outlook. Winter Issue, 1968.<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. WORKSHOP<br />

Washington<br />

OF PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. The Division, 1968.<br />

MANUAL<br />

(State). GovernorVs Advisory Council on Urban Affairs.<br />

Washington<br />

WASHINGTON: APATHY OR ACTION? A report. Urban Affairs<br />

URBAN<br />

c/o Secretary of State, Legislative Building, Olympia,<br />

Council,<br />

1968.<br />

275


(State). Governor's Mental Health and Mental Retardation<br />

Washington<br />

Committee. EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN. A summary of Washing-<br />

Planning<br />

Comprehensive Plan to Help the Mentally Retarded. The<br />

ton's<br />

Olympia, 1966.<br />

Committee,<br />

(State). Governor's Task Force on Executive Organization.<br />

Washington<br />

TO GOVERNOR DANIEL J. EVANS. Brewster C. Denny, Chairman.<br />

REPORT<br />

The Committee, Olympia, 1968.<br />

(State). Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.<br />

Washington<br />

SURVEY OF THE STATUS AND NEEDS OF SECONDARY SPECIAL EDUCATION.<br />

A<br />

G. Newton Buker. Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction,<br />

By<br />

Capitol Building, Olympia, 1968.<br />

Old<br />

(State). Planning and Community Affairs Agency. NONWHITE<br />

Washington<br />

STATE OF WASHINGTON. By Calvin F. Schmid (and others).<br />

RACES,<br />

The Agency, Olympia, 1968.<br />

(State). State Legislature, Forty-First Regular Session,<br />

Washington<br />

HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 9. By Representative John<br />

1969.<br />

"To the Honorable Richard M. Nixon, President of the<br />

Merrill.<br />

States, and to the Senate and House of Representatives<br />

United<br />

the United States of America, in Congress Assembled." This<br />

of<br />

a petition to Congress to enact legislation "expanding assis-<br />

is<br />

tance to solve the transportation needs of handicapped people."<br />

(State). Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

Washington<br />

DIRECTORY OF AGENCIES PROVIDING WORK TRAINING<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE. Developed<br />

AND/OR<br />

the University of Washington (Seattle) Rehabilitation<br />

under<br />

Education Program. Compiled by Charles Freeman,<br />

Counselor<br />

Fisher, Betty Marion, and Larry Paustian. Editorial<br />

Carolyn<br />

comments by Jerald R. Forster, Ph.D.<br />

.(State). Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

Washington<br />

REHABILITATION ADVANCE: PLANNING TO SERVE<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

HANDICAPPED AND DISADVANTAGED. ASummary. David C. Carson.<br />

THE<br />

Commission, 1969.<br />

The<br />

(State). Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational<br />

Washington<br />

REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE: PROGRAMS<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

BY STATE AGENCIES. David C. Carson, Eo M. Oliver and<br />

PROVIDED<br />

B. Welsh, Jr. The Commission, Olympia, 1968.<br />

John<br />

University. ROLE OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION IN COMMUN-<br />

Wisconsin.<br />

MENTAL HEALTH. Report of a conference, September 13-15<br />

ITY<br />

Madison, Wisconsin, under auspices of Wisconsin Psychia-<br />

1967,<br />

Institute University of Wisconsin and Rehabilitation<br />

tric<br />

Administration, Region V. Edited by Leigh M. Roberts.<br />

Services<br />

1968.<br />

The-University,<br />

276


Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. FINAL REPORT<br />

Wisconsin.<br />

STATEWIDE PLANNING FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

COMPREHENSIVE<br />

SERVICES. The Division, 1968.<br />

Publications of the Rehabilitation Services Administration<br />

S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Rehabilitation<br />

U.<br />

Administration. U. S. Government Printing Office,<br />

Services<br />

Washington, D.C.<br />

ANALYSIS OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR NONDISABLED<br />

AN<br />

PERSONS. Prepared by Division of Statistics and<br />

DISADVANTAGED<br />

the Administration, Washington, D.C. Reprinted by<br />

Studies<br />

Council for Occupational Education, Division of<br />

Coordinating<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation, Olympia, Washington, 1968.<br />

STATISTICS STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCIES:<br />

CASELOAD<br />

1968.<br />

INTRODUCTION TO THE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROCESS; A<br />

AN<br />

MANUAL. By John F. McGowan and Thomas L. Porter.<br />

TRAINING<br />

Revised July 1967.<br />

OF THE ALCOHOLIC: A REPORT FROM THE STUDY GROUP<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

REHABILITATION OF THE ALCOHOLIC AND PUBLIC OFFENDER. Sixth<br />

ON<br />

on Rehabilitation Services, May 20-22, 1968, University<br />

Institute<br />

Pennsylvania.<br />

Park,<br />

OF THE PUBLIC OFFENDER. Fifth Institute on<br />

REHABILITATION<br />

Services, May 22-25, 1967, Madison, Wisconsin.<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY PROGRAM DATA FISCAL<br />

STATE.<br />

1967.<br />

YEAR<br />

277


APPENDICES<br />

278


0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0<br />

280<br />

rO<br />

0<br />

APPENDIX A<br />

o


CHAIRMEN OF REGIONAL COMMITTEES<br />

Mr. Herb Altschull Region I Seattle<br />

.Mr. Rodney A. Boddington Region II Sultan<br />

William N. Paris<br />

Mr.<br />

D. Murray Mason<br />

Mr.<br />

III Longview<br />

Region<br />

III Longview<br />

Region<br />

Mrs. Sherman Pinto Region IV Tacoma<br />

The Honorable Robert D. McDougall Region V Wenatchee<br />

The Honorable Marjorie Lynch Region VI Yakima<br />

Helen Powers<br />

Mrs.<br />

Raymond Raschko<br />

Mr.<br />

Vll Spokane<br />

Region<br />

VII Spokane<br />

Region<br />

Mr. Roger C. Larson Region VIII Pullman<br />

282<br />

APPENDIX B


APPENDIX C<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Commission and staff are greatly indebted to these advisory<br />

The<br />

many of whose members met numerous times to study needs,<br />

committees,<br />

problems, consider proposals and work out pocedures. Their<br />

identify<br />

efforts are reflected at many points in this report.<br />

dedicated<br />

sincere appreciation is also expressed to those many con-<br />

Our<br />

citizens who attended the series of local hearings and study<br />

cerned<br />

throughout the state to express the needs of the disabled and<br />

sessions<br />

contribute their thinking toward solutions.<br />

to<br />

Forster, Ph.D.,<br />

Jerald<br />

Seattle<br />

Chairman,<br />

Grindrod, Seattle<br />

Edward<br />

R. Erickson, Seattle<br />

Dennis<br />

H. P. Hall, Seattle<br />

J.<br />

Martha MacFarlane, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

J. Goleeke,<br />

William<br />

Seattle<br />

Chairman,<br />

Helen Mickelsen,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Seattle<br />

Co-chairman,<br />

C. Betz, Co-chairman,<br />

Roger<br />

Seattle<br />

Settle, Seattle<br />

Kenneth<br />

D. Powell, Seattle<br />

Robert<br />

J. Rhodes, Ph.D.,<br />

Robert<br />

Seattle<br />

M. Hudson, Seattle<br />

Richard<br />

J. Whitmore, M.D.,<br />

Janet<br />

Seattle<br />

James Osborn, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Robert V. Schembs,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Issaquah<br />

ADVISORY COMMITTEES<br />

TASK FORCE I REGION I KING COUNTY<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

Constance Carter, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

S. Lane, Vashon<br />

William<br />

Helen A. Hanson, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

R. Sparkman, M.D., Seattle<br />

Donal<br />

Carl L. Marrs, Redmond<br />

TASK FORCE II REGION I KING COUNTY<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

283<br />

W. Carter, Seattle<br />

Randolph<br />

G. Russell, Seattle<br />

Douglas<br />

Beryl Gridley, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

W. Baker, Bremerton<br />

Robert<br />

H. Jeynes, Olympia<br />

Payson<br />

Holly T. Day, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Arwine, Seattle<br />

Russ<br />

Jacobson, Bellevue<br />

Albert<br />

A. E. Naess, Jr., Seattle<br />

J.<br />

A. Mehas, Seattle<br />

Arthur<br />

Blanche Wolman, Edmonds<br />

Ms.<br />

Nathanson, Kirkland<br />

Phil<br />

Kay Plumb, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

Walkama, Seattle<br />

William


E. Unti, Chairman,<br />

William<br />

Seattle<br />

TASK FORCE III REGION I KING COUNTY<br />

Lewellen, Seattle<br />

Dwayne<br />

Blanche Causey, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

Sweetser, Seattle<br />

Jack<br />

D. Stanley, Seattle<br />

Dayton<br />

Frances Taylor, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Rose Lee, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

S. Sampson, Seattle<br />

Miles<br />

W. Abbott, Seattle<br />

Chauncy<br />

L. Eastly, Seattle<br />

Leonard<br />

Elizabeth Benedict,<br />

Miss<br />

Seattle<br />

Dorothy Bostrom, Seattle<br />

Miss<br />

Harold Fish, Seattle<br />

Palmer, Ph.D.,<br />

Densley<br />

Seattle<br />

Chairman,<br />

Cecile Lindquist,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Seattle<br />

Co-chairman,<br />

Bette King, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

W. Taylor, Auburn<br />

Harold<br />

Holman, Auburn<br />

Hayes<br />

MacDonald, Seattle<br />

Carl<br />

J. Straka, Kent<br />

Thomas<br />

Anne Milner, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

John Milner, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Howard, Seattle<br />

Roy<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

Josephine Bates, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

Mineo Katagiri, Seattle<br />

Rev.<br />

Thibaudeau, Seattle<br />

Roger<br />

Gladys Kirk, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

Claypool, Seattle<br />

Paul<br />

H. Kennedy, Seattle<br />

Elmer<br />

Cobb, Seattle<br />

Mrs.Marguerite<br />

E. Cole, M.D., Seattle<br />

Robert<br />

Bigelow, Seattle<br />

John<br />

Johnson, Seattle<br />

Frank<br />

Adolph Gruhn, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Jan Twight, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

D. Ford, Bellevue<br />

Loren<br />

R. Cornell, Seattle<br />

Gary<br />

Percy B. Bell, Seattle<br />

TASK FORCE IV REGION I KING COUNTY<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

V. Low, Bellevue<br />

Cecil<br />

Aurora Temple, Seattle<br />

Ms.<br />

Mrs. Tusguo Ikeda, Seattle<br />

S. Leckenby, Seattle<br />

William<br />

O...Stewart, Seattle<br />

Louis<br />

John Bakke, Kirkland<br />

Mrs.<br />

DeBell, Bellevue<br />

George<br />

J. Schierberl, Seattle<br />

Edward<br />

Pattison, Seattle<br />

Warren<br />

Marian Hedgecock, Seattle<br />

Miss<br />

R. Dunham, Seattle<br />

Jerome<br />

T. Spencer, Seattle<br />

John<br />

G. Olsen, Seattle<br />

Jack<br />

Puckett, Seattle<br />

Gordon<br />

Wilson, Seattle<br />

Lloyd<br />

A. Allan, Ed.D., Midway<br />

M.<br />

L. C. Hoover, Edmonds<br />

Dr.<br />

Phillip Heggen, Seattle<br />

TASK FORCE V REGION I KING COUNTY<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

Johnson, Chairman,<br />

Charles<br />

Seattle<br />

Donald Brazier, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Carol DeVry, Seattle<br />

Miss<br />

Hayashi, Auburn<br />

Richard<br />

Myla Koch, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Raklios, Seattle<br />

John<br />

D. Smith, Federal Way<br />

Vincent<br />

284<br />

Steinberg, Seattle<br />

Herb<br />

Stricker, Bellevue<br />

Gus<br />

Taft, Seattle<br />

William<br />

Evans Wyckoff, Seattle<br />

Mrs.<br />

Stolov, M.D., Seattle<br />

Walter<br />

Pontius, Seattle<br />

Lester<br />

Silverman,M.D., Seattle<br />

Donald<br />

Arland Bratnold, Seattle<br />

Mrs.


TASK FORCE I REGION II<br />

ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />

CLALLAM,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

WHATCOM<br />

Patterson, Co-chairman,<br />

Mark<br />

Everett<br />

Gilmore, Ph.D.,<br />

Harold<br />

Everett<br />

Co-chairman,<br />

Hazel Venables, Everett<br />

Mrs.<br />

Beryl Manley, Everett<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wirt, Monroe<br />

Robert<br />

L. Miller, Bellingham<br />

Keith<br />

Kanarr, Port Townsend<br />

John<br />

Buse, Marysville<br />

August<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

Hugh Cantelon, Bellingham<br />

Rev.<br />

Verna Frees, Edmonds<br />

Mrs.<br />

Alice White, Chimacum<br />

Ms.<br />

Dignum, Port Townsend<br />

Daine<br />

Trudi Heffern, Mt. Vernon<br />

Ms.<br />

F. Rodenberga, Mukilteo<br />

Robert<br />

H. Merritt, Mt. Vernon<br />

Robert<br />

C. Studry, Mt. Vernon<br />

N.<br />

Mrs. Helen Pemberton, Port Angeles<br />

TASK FORCE II REGION II<br />

ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN' SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />

CLALLAM,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

WHATCOM<br />

Jacobsen, Co-chairman,<br />

Carl<br />

Everett<br />

Hatch, Co-chairman<br />

Michael<br />

Lynnwood<br />

Olson, Bellingham<br />

Charles<br />

F. Thompson, Ph.D.,<br />

E.<br />

Woolley<br />

Sedro<br />

Shirley Benke,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Terrace<br />

Mountlake<br />

Gladys Eckhart, Edmonds<br />

Ms.<br />

Ms. Reda E. Albright, Bellingham<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

K. Fort, Mt. Vernon<br />

Richard<br />

H. Holmes, Marysville<br />

C.<br />

Ruthruff, Port Angeles<br />

Harold<br />

G. Thorlakson, Mt. Vernon<br />

Richard<br />

E. Harris, Anacortes<br />

Roy<br />

Donat, Mt. Vernon<br />

Dan<br />

Frasier, Oak Harbor<br />

George<br />

L. White, Everett<br />

Allan<br />

E. Sharp, Mt. Vernon<br />

John<br />

Wrobel, Burlington<br />

Charles<br />

Strong, Burlington<br />

Adrian<br />

Eggert, Bellingham<br />

Marvin<br />

TASK FORCE III REGION II<br />

ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />

CLALLAM,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

WHATCOM<br />

D. White, Chairman,<br />

Charles<br />

Olympia<br />

H. Ostling, Co-chairman,<br />

Edward<br />

Everett<br />

J. Bourns, Bellingham<br />

B.<br />

A. Elmore, Monroe<br />

R.<br />

R. Truax, Mr. Vernon<br />

W.<br />

F. Feldmann, Bellingham<br />

Lester<br />

Earnest D. Byers, Everett<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

285<br />

W. Ford, Anacortes<br />

Jesse<br />

Bernice Duvall, Mt. Vernon<br />

Mrs.<br />

Vera Hays, Bellingham<br />

Mrs.<br />

Margaret DeBore, Alderwood Manor<br />

Mrs.<br />

J. Dodson, Snohomish<br />

Robert<br />

M. Quaranta, Everett<br />

Joe<br />

Clifford Anderson, Everett<br />

Dr.<br />

Thompson, Ph.D., Sedro Woolley<br />

Fred


TASK FORCE IV REGION II<br />

ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />

CLALLAM,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

WHATCOM<br />

Engman, Chairman,<br />

Kenneth<br />

Everett<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

Clement, Co-chairman,<br />

William<br />

Bellingham<br />

Pruiett, Mt. Vernon<br />

Ray<br />

Smith, Bellingham<br />

Ray<br />

Pierce, Mt. Vernon<br />

Vernon<br />

Leathers, Mt. Vernon<br />

Sam<br />

Langenhorst, Mt. Vernon<br />

Hubert<br />

Pittman, Mt. Vernon<br />

Robert<br />

Ernie Fox, Monroe<br />

TASK FORCE V REGION II<br />

Ludwick, Mukilteo<br />

Ernie<br />

Edith Wicker, Sedro Woolley<br />

Mrs.<br />

Libby Matthias, Everett<br />

Ms.<br />

Wilma Smith, Burlington<br />

Ms.<br />

Vera Fuhrman, Mountlake Terrace<br />

Ms.<br />

Bliss, Bellingham<br />

Ed<br />

Anna Cowles, Lake Stevens<br />

Mrs.<br />

Ednis Dunbar, Port Townsend<br />

Miss<br />

ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />

CLALLAM,<br />

COUNTIES.<br />

WHATCOM<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

Carle, Chairman,<br />

Harry<br />

Everett<br />

Farnham, Everett<br />

L.<br />

Holmes, Port Townsend<br />

John<br />

Lucille Jones,<br />

Ms.<br />

Woodinville<br />

TASK FORCE I REGION III<br />

E. Sternberg, Seattle<br />

Louis<br />

Evelyn M. Hylton, Olympia<br />

Ms.<br />

Mary Long, Lynnwood<br />

Mrs.<br />

Grace Hunter, Edmonds<br />

Ms.<br />

CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />

Foley, Longview<br />

Ray<br />

A. Johnson, Longview<br />

Joe<br />

Dean Gregorius, Longview<br />

J.<br />

Gennette, Kelso<br />

Tom<br />

Betty Jones, Chehalis<br />

Mrs.<br />

Marilyn Hoehne, Longview<br />

Mrs.<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

286<br />

Betty Steinke, Vancouver<br />

Mrs.<br />

Leone Sunderland, Longview<br />

Ms.<br />

Ruth Ford, Longview<br />

Ms.<br />

M. Woodworth, Vancouver<br />

Lionel<br />

Mr. Marshall Fernandez, Camas


TASK FORCE II REGION III<br />

CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />

& Mrs. James Gould,.<br />

Mr.<br />

Vancouver<br />

Co-chairmen,<br />

Thoreson, Centralia<br />

Jerry<br />

Joe Dixon, Vancouver<br />

Mrs.<br />

Duke, Vancouver<br />

Fred<br />

C. Smith, Vancouver<br />

Ray<br />

& Mrs. Edward E..Staley,<br />

Mr.<br />

Vancouver<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

White, Portland<br />

Floyd<br />

Jeynes, Olympia<br />

Payson<br />

& Mrs. Glen R. Hull,<br />

Mr.<br />

Chehalis<br />

Doris Johnston, Centralia<br />

Ms.<br />

Mary I. Robinson, Centralia<br />

Ms.<br />

Mary Lou Harris, Chehalis<br />

Mrs.<br />

Nadine Williams, Longview<br />

Ms.<br />

TASK FORCE III REGION III<br />

CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />

Tegarden, Chairman,<br />

Donald<br />

Kelso<br />

Tinker, Longview<br />

William<br />

H. Horne, Longview<br />

Harold<br />

Dusenbery, Vancouver<br />

Harris<br />

Bonnie Easley, Longview<br />

Ms.<br />

C. Hall, Longview<br />

Herb<br />

Peterson, Kelso<br />

Wesley<br />

E. Hoehne, Longview<br />

Mark<br />

Holloman, Chehalis<br />

David<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

Mary W. Silk, Vancouver<br />

Mrs.<br />

Linda Miller, Vancouver<br />

Miss<br />

Steffen, Vancouver<br />

Daryle<br />

Cooper, Toutle<br />

Bob<br />

Martin Lee, Castle Rock<br />

Rev.<br />

B. McFadden, Stevenson<br />

C.<br />

Howard Murphy, Wahkiakum County<br />

Mrs.<br />

Druschel, Skamania County<br />

Floyd<br />

Richard Adlard, Skamania County<br />

I.<br />

Esther Lines, Chehalis<br />

Miss<br />

TASK FORCE IV REGION III<br />

CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

Tucker, Chairman,<br />

William<br />

Edmonds<br />

Virgil W. Epperson,<br />

Dr.<br />

Vancouver<br />

R. Kelly, Vancouver<br />

Hobart<br />

Orpha Christianson,<br />

Ms.<br />

Longview<br />

M. Josephine Moore,<br />

Mr.<br />

Longview<br />

287<br />

R. Martinson, Chehalis<br />

Luddy<br />

R. Spagen, Chehalis<br />

David<br />

Virginia Champion, Camas<br />

Mrs.<br />

C. L. Bauer, Vancouver<br />

Mrs.<br />

Agar, Stevenson<br />

Dennis<br />

Toews, Longview<br />

Harry


TASK FORCE V REGION III<br />

CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />

Berhow, Chairman,<br />

Byron<br />

Vancouver<br />

Wever, Napavine<br />

Rick<br />

S. Allen, Centralia<br />

Hugh<br />

Mary Ellen Trostad,<br />

Ms.<br />

Longview<br />

Elizabeth Meharg,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Kelso<br />

Barbara M. Walker,<br />

Ms.<br />

Vancouver<br />

Dale P. Burr, Vancouver<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

TASK FORCE I REGION IV<br />

F. McDonnell, Vancouver<br />

J.<br />

Marie C. Lloyd, Vancouver<br />

Ms.<br />

H. Gorton M.D., Kelso<br />

S.<br />

D. Quant, Chehalis<br />

R.<br />

Betty Horne, Longview<br />

Mrs.<br />

W. Schafer, Chehalis<br />

Marvin<br />

J. C. Aitchison, Washougal<br />

GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THIDRSTON COUNTIES<br />

Johns, Ph.D.,<br />

Donald<br />

Olympia<br />

Chairman,<br />

Peach, Tacoma<br />

Tom<br />

Oliver, Tacoma<br />

Joe<br />

Sam Ebinger, Shelton<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

TASK FORCE II REGION IV<br />

N. Weaver, Olympia<br />

William<br />

Genevieve Bruggerman, Olympia<br />

Ms.<br />

Hindman, Aberdeen<br />

George<br />

Ross, Tacoma<br />

Lawrence<br />

Mrs. GeorgeGilman, Tacoma<br />

GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />

Shields, Chairman,<br />

Doyle<br />

Olympia<br />

C. Flowers, Olympia<br />

Clarence<br />

R. Nelson, Gig<br />

Dolaine<br />

Harbor<br />

Abbie Meach, Olympia<br />

Mrs.<br />

Florence Swope,<br />

Ms.<br />

Bremerton<br />

Flanagan, Lacey<br />

Warren<br />

Fred V. Russell,<br />

Captain<br />

Bremerton<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

288<br />

Acklin York, Silverdale<br />

Mrs.<br />

Jan Loutzenhiser, Olympia<br />

Mrs.<br />

Johnson, Olympia<br />

Norman<br />

Gibbs, Aberdeen<br />

Mrs.<br />

Weber, Ocean Shores<br />

Richard<br />

McElvain, Tumwater<br />

Lloyd<br />

G. Walker, Tacoma<br />

Herman<br />

Nelson, Olympia<br />

Atley<br />

Gentry, Tacoma<br />

James<br />

Jeynes, Olympia<br />

PaysonH.


TASK FORCE III REGION IV<br />

GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />

Meurer, Chairman,<br />

Jack<br />

Olympia<br />

Blanche Griswold,<br />

Ms.<br />

Bremerton<br />

Alice I. Helenius,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Olympia<br />

R. McDougall,<br />

Gordon<br />

Tacoma<br />

P. Holden, Olympia<br />

Donald<br />

Ruth R. Kane,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Steilacoom<br />

Lenore Simonsen,<br />

Ms.<br />

Bremerton<br />

Laukkanen, Aberdeen<br />

Ron<br />

Paul Ellis, Ph.D., Olympia<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

TASK FORCE IV REGION IV<br />

Eleanor Brown, Bremerton<br />

Ms.<br />

P. FQrd, Ed.D., Tacoma<br />

Thornton<br />

Mantz, Shelton<br />

Bud<br />

Adams, Tacoma<br />

Charles<br />

J. Larsen, Seattle<br />

Ervin<br />

Norton, Renton<br />

John<br />

Jean Gay, Aberdeen<br />

Ms.<br />

W. Mears, Bremerton<br />

Robert<br />

W. Mourray, Tumwater<br />

L.<br />

G. Lloyd, Olalla<br />

Robert<br />

Evelyn Wright, Bremerton<br />

Ms.<br />

Alice Sandvick, Bremerton<br />

Ms.<br />

Carol Hazelrigg, Tacoma<br />

Ms.<br />

Hazel A. Hestley, Bremerton<br />

Ms.<br />

Ms. Shirley Atwater, Bremerton<br />

GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

H. Thoemke, Chairman,<br />

Wallace<br />

Olympia<br />

L. Geyer, Tacoma<br />

Virgil<br />

Donna Baurickter,<br />

Ms.<br />

Puyallup<br />

Fred Miner, Lakewood<br />

Dr.<br />

Center<br />

D. Williams, Ed.D.,<br />

Robert<br />

Bremerton<br />

Irons, Bremerton<br />

Joe<br />

Murphy, Tacoma<br />

John<br />

Brennan, Tacoma<br />

Bruce<br />

M. Gramann, Spanaway<br />

Fred<br />

Carl Stegman, Tacoma<br />

W.<br />

Spilseth, Shelton<br />

Ray<br />

Margaret Howland,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Bremerton<br />

Nolt, Tacoma<br />

Roy<br />

Baird, Tacoma<br />

Ralph<br />

Eva Katzenberger,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Bremerton<br />

289<br />

Dorothy C. Asplund, Olympia<br />

Miss<br />

Jean Olds, Tacoma<br />

Miss<br />

L. Pederson, Aberdeen<br />

Fred<br />

L. Switzer, Tacoma<br />

R.<br />

B. Kluge, Tacoma<br />

Karl<br />

George Warren, Olympia<br />

F.<br />

O. Ireland, Buckley<br />

John<br />

Ellingson, Ph.D., Gig Harbor<br />

Floyd<br />

M. Goodpaster, Shelton<br />

J.<br />

J. Orlando, Tacoma<br />

Robert<br />

Helena G. Adamson, Olympia<br />

Mrs.<br />

Willmarth, Olympia<br />

John<br />

Solvang, Tacoma<br />

Paul<br />

S. Hooper, Bremerton<br />

E.<br />

J. Robinson, Bremerton<br />

M.<br />

L. S. Lewis, Tacoma<br />

Mrs.<br />

Gustafson, Tacoma<br />

Frank<br />

Hamlette, Olympia<br />

Clyde<br />

Catherine Dana, Olympia<br />

Miss<br />

Jacob, Olympia<br />

Sam<br />

Mrs. V. Ringe!, Tacoma


TASK FORCE V REGION IV<br />

GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

Johnson, Chairman,<br />

Bruce<br />

Olympia<br />

L. Lee, Tacoma<br />

Clarence<br />

A. Price, Olympia<br />

Cecil<br />

Jo Anderson, Ph.D.,<br />

Frederic<br />

Tacoma<br />

Leo E. Schmiege, Shelton<br />

TASK FORCE I REGION V<br />

Bernard Saibel, Olympia<br />

Dr.<br />

Auseth, Shelton<br />

Martin<br />

Beals, Tacoma<br />

Crowell<br />

R. Lazare, Tacoma<br />

Daniel<br />

William Buell, Tacoma<br />

CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />

John McCaw, Chairman,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

East<br />

Florence Holterhoff,<br />

Ms.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

H. Anderson, Coulee<br />

Elmer<br />

Dam<br />

L. Krens, 0kanogan<br />

Larry<br />

L. Prewitt,<br />

Robert<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Schafer, Wenatchee<br />

David<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

TASK FORCE II REGION V<br />

Harry D. Hunter, Wenatchee<br />

Dr.<br />

W. Woods, Wenatchee<br />

Robert<br />

Kloes, Wenatchee<br />

Harold<br />

C. Schoeneman, Wenatchee<br />

E.<br />

Maude Craven, East<br />

Ms.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

A. A. Morrison, Wenatchee<br />

CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />

Henry Struck, Chairman,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

East<br />

Andrist, Omak<br />

John<br />

Grubich, Wenatchee<br />

Nick<br />

Wagner, Coulee Dam<br />

Joseph<br />

Barbara Starkey,<br />

Ms.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

290<br />

Penfold, Wenatchee<br />

Jess<br />

R. Kingston, Wenatchee<br />

George<br />

Allen, Wenatchee<br />

Kenneth<br />

Craven, Wenatchee<br />

Lev<br />

Payson H. Jeynes, Olympia


Eleanor N. Snyder,<br />

Dr.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Chairman,<br />

Carolyn Warman,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Co-chairman,<br />

& Mrs. Win Baker,<br />

Mr.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

L. J. Schoentrup,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Co F. McNeal,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Carol K. Anderson,<br />

Miss<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Milne, Chairman,<br />

AI<br />

Cashmere<br />

TASK FORCE III REGION V<br />

CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

TASK FORCE IV REGION V<br />

Joan Erickson, Wenatchee<br />

Mrs.<br />

Meredith arris, Entiat<br />

Mrs.<br />

Hartley, Wenatchee<br />

Robert<br />

Larson, Wenatchee<br />

Howard<br />

Kuntz, Wenatchee<br />

Mrs.Frank<br />

Stanford, Wenatchee<br />

Glenn<br />

Hood, Cashmere<br />

Bill<br />

Bradford, Wenatchee<br />

Robert<br />

V. Ramsey, Wenatchee<br />

Clyde<br />

Dan McMonagle, Wenatchee<br />

Mrs.<br />

Mrs. Barbara Bonifaci, Wenatchee<br />

CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

A. Bauer, Co-chairman,<br />

Henry<br />

Wenatchee<br />

V. Breckenridge,<br />

L.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Wardle, Wenatchee<br />

Wayne<br />

Eva Anderson,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Frances B. Stanton,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Waterville<br />

TASK FORCE V REGION V<br />

Lee, Wenatchee<br />

Vance<br />

G. Campbell, Wenatchee<br />

Donald<br />

Shirley R. Bossen, Wenatchee<br />

Ms.<br />

AdelineConner, Wenatchee<br />

Mrs.<br />

Pauline Isaminger, Wenatchee<br />

Mrs.<br />

Clark, Omak<br />

Foster<br />

Schmidt, Omak<br />

Wayne<br />

Eller, Wenatchee<br />

Jay<br />

James E. Moran, Wenatchee<br />

CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

Hedeen, Chairman,<br />

Gerald<br />

Wenatchee<br />

East<br />

Richardson, Wenatchee<br />

Claude<br />

C. T. Cedergreen,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wenatchee<br />

Madland, Wenatchee<br />

Mike<br />

291<br />

Eugene E. Gnagy, Wenatchee<br />

Rev.<br />

C. Kuchenreuther, Wenatchee<br />

I.<br />

Curtis, East Wenatchee<br />

Bob<br />

W. Bryant, Wenatchee<br />

Harley<br />

George, Orondo<br />

Myrl<br />

Avery, Wenatchee<br />

Warren<br />

Kirby Billingsley, Wenatchee


F. Redmond, Ph.D.,<br />

John<br />

Yakima<br />

TASK FORCE I REGION VI<br />

KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />

Marchant, Grandview<br />

Lonnie<br />

Follett, Yakima<br />

Don<br />

H. Foster, Yakima<br />

Keith<br />

M. Hayden, Yakima<br />

Paul<br />

G. A. Dierdorff,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Sunnyside<br />

Jeannette S. Johnson,<br />

Ms.<br />

Richland<br />

A. Porter, Ellensburg<br />

Durward<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

TASK FORCE II REGION Vl<br />

Helen E. Peterson, Yakima<br />

Ms.<br />

Eleanor Heffernan, Yakima<br />

Ms.<br />

C. Smith, akima<br />

Don<br />

Stanley Coffin, Yakima<br />

Mrs.<br />

N. Dickinsen, Yakima<br />

Neil.<br />

Conrad, Yakima<br />

Les<br />

Cliff Onsgard, Grandview<br />

KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />

Cook, Chairman, Yakima<br />

Rene<br />

Coppers, Co-chairman,<br />

Bud<br />

Yakima<br />

C. Van Rooy, Yakima<br />

Donald<br />

H. Jeynes, Olympia<br />

Payson<br />

Seago, Yakima<br />

Carl<br />

Roy Brown, Yakima<br />

J.<br />

Dwarshuis, Yakima<br />

Fred<br />

Kathryn Safford, Selah<br />

Miss<br />

J. Rolstad, Yakima<br />

Donald<br />

Boley, Chairman,<br />

Jack<br />

Yakima<br />

Mary Wingate, Yakima<br />

Mrs.<br />

Smith, Yakima<br />

Horace<br />

Pat Erickson,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Ellensburg<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

TASK FORCE III " REGION Vl<br />

L. LaDue, Ellensburg<br />

Walter<br />

Nancy Mears, Mabton<br />

Mrs.<br />

Audrey Bontrager, Yakima<br />

Ms.<br />

Staley, Toppenish<br />

LeRoy<br />

Betty Brunner, Ellensburg<br />

Ms.<br />

Marie Cross, Yakima<br />

Ms.<br />

D. Bennett, Yakima<br />

Earle<br />

Leland S. Harris, Yakima<br />

Dr.<br />

S. Buckman, Yakima<br />

H.<br />

Ruth Adams, Yakima<br />

Ms.<br />

KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />

Catherine Brown, Selah<br />

Miss<br />

H. Hendricks, Yakima<br />

LaVar<br />

S. Barnard, Sunnyside<br />

W.<br />

C. Werner, Yakima<br />

Hubert<br />

Garret Horsley, Wapato<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

292<br />

Fram, Selah<br />

Joseph<br />

E. Baldwin, Toppenish<br />

Charles<br />

Ingalsbe, Yakima<br />

Bliss<br />

A. Clarke, Yakima<br />

RoBert<br />

J. Megivern, Toppenish<br />

Richard.<br />

L. Wilson, Ellensburg<br />

Kenneth<br />

Louise M. Murdock, Goldendale<br />

Ms.<br />

O. Field, Yakima<br />

Edward<br />

P. Smith, Yakima<br />

Stanley<br />

Swenson, Yakima<br />

Bill


Wilson, Chairman,<br />

John<br />

Yakima<br />

Knutsen, Grandview<br />

Earl<br />

A. 0'Reilly, Yakima<br />

H.<br />

TASK FORCE IV REGION VI<br />

KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

S. Henderson, Ellensburg<br />

Hyrum<br />

Effie Mae Lofgren,<br />

Ms.<br />

Goldendale<br />

Bunnell, Yakima<br />

Marion<br />

Driscoll, Yakima<br />

Lee<br />

Gannon, Wapato<br />

Harlan<br />

Blaine C. Hardy, Wapato<br />

TASK FORCE V REGION VI<br />

Cope, Yakima<br />

Wesley<br />

Jaquysh, Yakima<br />

William<br />

V. Lombardi, Union Gap<br />

George<br />

Mamie Morrison, Yakima<br />

Mrs.<br />

Friedline, Jr., Yakima<br />

Martin<br />

Frye, Ed.D., Ellensburg<br />

Ronald<br />

McDowell, Yakima<br />

Don<br />

Mould, Yakima<br />

Richard<br />

Zehr, Yakima<br />

Les<br />

Corless, Sunnyside<br />

Bob<br />

KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

W. Scott, Sr.,<br />

James<br />

Yakima<br />

Chairman,<br />

Knowles, Co-chairman,<br />

Clayton<br />

Yakima<br />

F. Naumann, Ph.D., Ellensburg<br />

T.<br />

Joy, Yakima<br />

Mel<br />

C. Griffith, Yakima<br />

Harold<br />

Kass, Yakima<br />

Ted<br />

Lindgren, Yakima<br />

Olaf<br />

Wilson, Yakima<br />

Mort<br />

Wehde, Yakima<br />

Fred<br />

Hoshauer, Yakima<br />

Dan<br />

Carter, Yakima<br />

Don<br />

Davis, Yakima<br />

Hugh<br />

James Nolan, Yakima<br />

TASK FORCE I REGION VII<br />

FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />

ADAMS,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

STEVENS<br />

Abey, Chairman, Spokane<br />

Les<br />

Priebe, Co-chairman,<br />

Melcher<br />

Spokane<br />

R. Francisco, Spokane<br />

Barney<br />

Dr. Donald C. Scott, Spokane<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

293<br />

Florence Hansen, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

Jeanne Gladder, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

Milan<br />

Charles-Jasper,<br />

B. Craig, M.D., Spokane<br />

Arthur


TASK FORCE II REGION Vll<br />

FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />

ADAMS,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

STEVENS<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

Maxene Freeman, Chairman,<br />

Miss<br />

Spokane<br />

Dunning, Co-chairman,-<br />

Arthur<br />

Spokane<br />

R. Slavens, Spokane<br />

Morris<br />

Messerschmidt, Ph.D.,<br />

Ramona<br />

Spokane<br />

R. Graybeal, Olympia<br />

Earl<br />

Robert Burdick, Spokane<br />

C.<br />

W. Harris, M.D., Spokane<br />

Milo<br />

Hester Hutsinpiller, Spokane<br />

Mary Ann Jhnson, Spokane<br />

Ms.<br />

Higgins, Spokane<br />

Charles<br />

Judge, Spokane<br />

Thomas<br />

W LaMunyon, Spokane<br />

W.<br />

W. Emerson, Spokane<br />

Van<br />

Runberg, Spokane<br />

Ted<br />

Max Taylor, Spokane<br />

TASK FORCE III REGION VII<br />

FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />

ADAMS,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

STEVENS<br />

Olmstead, Chairman,<br />

Vernon<br />

Spokane<br />

Goodwin, Co-chairman,<br />

Robert<br />

Spokane<br />

L. Gerla, Deer Park<br />

Benjamin<br />

Charneski, Spokane<br />

Larry<br />

Coyle, Spokane<br />

Dan<br />

Ruby Dubois, Colville<br />

Ms.<br />

H. L. Bunch, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

Eleanor Clifton, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

TASK FORCE IV REGION Vll<br />

Helen Stensgaard, Spokane<br />

Ms.<br />

Dorothy Matthews, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

Gertrude A. Ray, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

Robert Hanson, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

T. Freeman, Spokane<br />

Clarence<br />

Gerald Fallgren, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />

ADAMS,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

STEVENS<br />

Snider, Chairman,<br />

James<br />

Spokane<br />

McKenzie, Co-chairman,<br />

Alex<br />

Spokane<br />

C. J. Mueller, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

Flory, Spokane<br />

Jack<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

Hutsell, Spokane<br />

Robert<br />

Eleanor Peterson, Spokane<br />

Ms.<br />

L. Purdy, Spokane<br />

J.<br />

G. Minord, Spokane<br />

L.<br />

294<br />

O. Adams, M.D., Spokane<br />

Alfred<br />

H. Manzer, Deer Park<br />

Lewis<br />

Jessie L. Webb, Colville<br />

Mrs.<br />

L. Harris, Spokane<br />

Eugene<br />

Van Wey, Spokane<br />

Hank<br />

L. Hodin, Spokane<br />

Lillian<br />

Esther Zurbrugg, Spokane<br />

Ms.<br />

R. LaCasse, Spokane<br />

Mrs.


TASK FORCE V REGION Vll<br />

FERRY, GPT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />

ADAMS,<br />

COUNTIES<br />

STEVENS<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

McCarthy, Chairman,<br />

Charles<br />

Spokane<br />

Hammond, Spokane<br />

Paul<br />

Moyer, Spokane<br />

Michael<br />

McKie, Spokane<br />

Clair<br />

W. Brannon, Colville<br />

Ernest<br />

Virginia J. McCreight,<br />

Ms.<br />

Spokane<br />

J. Archie Morice, Spokane<br />

TASK FORCE I REGION VIII<br />

Crutcher,'Spokane<br />

Mack<br />

Naomi Sawins, Spokane<br />

Ms.<br />

L. C. Taylor, Spokane<br />

Mrs.<br />

Hazel I. Wynkoop, Spokane<br />

Ms.<br />

Marion Thomas, Spokane<br />

Miss<br />

Long, Spokane<br />

Leonard<br />

S. Casebolt, Spokane<br />

Victor<br />

C. Stebbins, Spokane<br />

Darrel<br />

BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />

ASOTIN,<br />

WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />

AND<br />

Robert Bennett, Chairman,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Richland<br />

Brock, Acting Chairman,<br />

George<br />

Pasco<br />

Omer Carey, Pullman<br />

Dr.<br />

C. A. Barnes, Clarkston-<br />

Rev.<br />

Donald R. McGee, Pomeroy<br />

(Prevalence of Disability)<br />

TASK FORCE II REGION VIII<br />

James Aylward, Walla Walla<br />

Mrs.<br />

Gislesen, Pasco<br />

Harold<br />

William H. Coston, Walla Walla<br />

Dr.<br />

E. Robinson, Walla Walla<br />

John<br />

James Cheatham, WallaWalla<br />

Dr.<br />

Catherine Rew, Walla Walla<br />

Mrs.<br />

Ms. Polly James, Clarkston<br />

BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />

ASOTIN,<br />

WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />

AND<br />

Byron Hunt, Chairman,<br />

Dr.<br />

Walla<br />

Walla<br />

(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />

Lester Mills, Co-chairman,<br />

Mrs.<br />

LaCrosse<br />

Clapp, Walla Walla<br />

Melvin<br />

Kegley, Walla Walla<br />

Vernon<br />

Mrs. Laura Stratton, Richland<br />

295<br />

Patricia E. McMahon, Kennewick<br />

Mrs.<br />

Jeynes, Olympia<br />

Payson<br />

Helen King, Walla Walla<br />

Mrs.<br />

Christianson, Walla Walla<br />

John<br />

Law Risken, Walla Walla


TASK FORCE III REGION Vlll<br />

BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />

ASOTIN,<br />

WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />

AND<br />

Harry Cobain, Chairman,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Walla<br />

Walla<br />

Rutledge, Co-chairman<br />

Dean<br />

Walla<br />

Walla<br />

Reynolds, Walla Walla<br />

Allen<br />

James Cheatham, Walla<br />

Mrs.<br />

Walla<br />

K. Glaze, Clarkston<br />

Gary<br />

G. Clifton, Colfax<br />

Carroll<br />

Harman, Pullman<br />

Eugene<br />

(Interagency Coordination)<br />

Cadman, Dayton<br />

Roy<br />

W. Bryant, Richland<br />

R.<br />

P. Brown, Prosser<br />

Wesley<br />

Helen Harris, Walla Walla<br />

Mrs.<br />

Julia Leva, Pasco<br />

Mrs.<br />

Frankie Day, Richland<br />

Mrs.<br />

Paysse, Pasco<br />

George<br />

Soper, Walla Walla<br />

Keith<br />

Marking, Ed.D., Pasco<br />

Kenneth<br />

Willis E. Sibley<br />

Mrs.<br />

TASK FORCE IV REGION VIII<br />

BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />

ASOTIN,<br />

WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />

AND<br />

(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />

Virginia Hunsaker,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Chairman, Walla Walla<br />

Acting<br />

M. Webb, Co-chairman,<br />

Everett<br />

Pullman<br />

McCloskey, Ph.D.,<br />

Gordon<br />

Pullman<br />

Bowers, Clarkston<br />

Curtis<br />

Dona Todd, Richland<br />

Mrs.<br />

Mary Gallwey, Pullman<br />

Mrs.<br />

Eickum, Connell<br />

John<br />

O' Bryan, Pullman<br />

Mick<br />

Ray, Richland<br />

Donald<br />

Blessinger, Walla Walla<br />

Douglas<br />

Frances Conway, Walla Walla<br />

Ms.<br />

296<br />

Jeanine Turner, Walla Walla<br />

Ms.<br />

Jordan, Walla Walla<br />

Dale<br />

Matthews, Walla Walla<br />

Thearn<br />

MacFarlan, Kennewick<br />

Robert<br />

Corinne K. Parsons, Richland<br />

Mrs.<br />

M. Robison, Richland<br />

Frank<br />

Jane A. Baker, Colfax<br />

Ms.<br />

Violet R. Lane, Walla. Walla<br />

Ms.<br />

Brownlee, Pasco<br />

Phil<br />

K. Shaber, Lewiston, Idaho (LCNS)<br />

G.<br />

Powell, Prosser<br />

Glenn<br />

Housel, Prosser<br />

Charles<br />

Jesse Bender, Pomeroy


TASK FORCE V REGION Vlll<br />

BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />

ASOTIN,<br />

WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />

AND<br />

(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />

Charles Malody, Chairman,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Pasco<br />

E. Baker, Co-chairman,<br />

Clarence<br />

Walla<br />

Walla<br />

Eunice E. Redshaw,<br />

Mrs.<br />

Clarkston<br />

Co-chairman,<br />

C. Adams, Walla Walla<br />

Jack<br />

Denniston, Kennewick<br />

Vernon<br />

Margaret Racy, Kennewick<br />

Mrs.<br />

A. Bates, Pasco<br />

Dale<br />

J. Locati, Walla Walla<br />

Joe<br />

A. Kramer, Richland<br />

Harry<br />

J. Baker, Walla Walla<br />

Carl<br />

A. Norris, Dayton<br />

Thomas<br />

297<br />

Barbara J. Kirschner, Pullman<br />

Mrs.<br />

P. Halbert, Pasco<br />

C.<br />

David Scott, Pullman<br />

Dr.<br />

Perrine, Clarkston<br />

Scott<br />

Ingram, Clarkston<br />

Robert<br />

& Mrs. Don Adams, Clarkston<br />

Mr.<br />

Feucht, Clarkston<br />

Carroll<br />

Anderson, Clarkston<br />

Fred<br />

Hayes, Clarkston<br />

Oliver<br />

Spring, Clarkston<br />

Norman<br />

Clarkston<br />

AntoneMauhar,<br />

Dunaway, Lewiston, Idaho<br />

Jack<br />

Jack Reed, Lewiston, Idaho


APPENDIX D<br />

document has been prepared as a proposal by Percy Bell,<br />

This<br />

Federal Offenders Program, with the help of Cecil A.<br />

Coordinator,<br />

State Supervisor of Correctional Services, both of the Division<br />

Price,<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation, to illustrate the complexity of providing<br />

of<br />

services to all the offenders in Washington State by<br />

rehabilitation<br />

1975.<br />

I. Purposeof Plan<br />

(PROPOSED)<br />

OF WASHINGTON<br />

STATE<br />

CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION PLAN<br />

COMPREHENSIVE<br />

FOR PUBLIC OFFENDERS<br />

plan is to be the framework upon which a comprehensive<br />

This<br />

for correctional rehabilitation can be built in the State of<br />

plan<br />

As time passes it is expected that changes will be<br />

Washington.<br />

It is hoped this plan will be flexible enough to allow<br />

made.<br />

changes without losing emphasis on and need for major ele-<br />

these<br />

This document will be in the. nature of policy statement.<br />

ments.<br />

will be followed by procedural manuals required to set policy<br />

This<br />

action.<br />

in<br />

implementation of the plan will take time. Funding,<br />

The<br />

of suitable personnel and the establishment of adequate<br />

training<br />

will all influence the speed withwhich implementation<br />

priorities<br />

take place.<br />

can<br />

evaluation and intuitive perceptions may all be used<br />

Research<br />

a basis for making changes in this plan or the procedural<br />

as<br />

manuals.<br />

II. Statement of Principles for Developing this Plan<br />

A. Assumptions<br />

Eventually a program will be in operation that will<br />

i.<br />

major needs of all the clients classified as<br />

meet<br />

public offenders.<br />

Meeting these needs will aid materially in developing<br />

2.<br />

responsible citizenry.<br />

more<br />

3. This will aid in reducing crime and delinquency.<br />

The sooner the counselor can contact the client the<br />

4.<br />

better.<br />

Providing rehabilitation services will enhance and<br />

5.<br />

resources.<br />

conservehuman<br />

298


There are not enough trained persons now to staff<br />

6.<br />

plan.<br />

thefull<br />

B. Other principles<br />

Motivational activities will have to be included in<br />

I.<br />

for services.<br />

planning<br />

Not all clien6s can be reached on an individual basis.<br />

2.<br />

group activity will have to be provided prior to<br />

Some<br />

referral and during .service.<br />

Disinterest in service cannot be used as an excuse<br />

3.<br />

discontinueefforts to provide service. Lack of<br />

to<br />

is part of the disability (deviant behavior)<br />

interest<br />

needs treatment as such.<br />

and<br />

Necessary emergent services need to be supplied during<br />

4.<br />

evaluation period prior to eligibility certification.<br />

the<br />

State rather than district supervision of correctional<br />

5.<br />

services will be continued.<br />

rehabilitation<br />

Most services will be provided by the district in which<br />

6.<br />

correctional facility is located.<br />

the<br />

Correctional rehabilitation counselors will be assigned<br />

7.<br />

caseloads.<br />

specialized<br />

Caseloads will be small enough to allow the counselor<br />

8.<br />

opportunity to provide expeditious service. (not<br />

an<br />

to exceed 50-65 initially)<br />

Nature of Problems Involved.in Developing a Correctional Rehabili-<br />

III.<br />

Plan<br />

tation<br />

Definition of a public offender: A public offender is any<br />

No<br />

or adult convicted or adjudicated by a court of<br />

juvenile<br />

jurisdiction, whether federal, state, or local,<br />

competent<br />

persons institutionalized, probated, paroled or<br />

including<br />

otherwise released.<br />

B. Magnitude of the problem.<br />

State rehabilitation district organization. It is anti-<br />

i.<br />

that housekeeping services, supplies, reports,<br />

cipated<br />

case services will be routinely handled through the<br />

and<br />

organization. Policy decisions, appointment of<br />

district<br />

and decisions regarding questionable case<br />

counselors,<br />

will be made through the State Supervisor of<br />

srvices<br />

Rehabilitation. In-service training will<br />

Correctional<br />

provided by the State Supervisor of Training in<br />

be<br />

299


with the State Supervisor of Correctional<br />

collaboration<br />

Rehabilitation.<br />

2. Crime rates<br />

3. Federal offenders<br />

a. Federal Courts, Probation and Parole officers<br />

Western District, Seattle and north<br />

(i)<br />

Western District, Tacoma and south<br />

(2)<br />

(3) Eastern District, Spokane<br />

b. U. S. Penitentiary, McNeil Island, Steilacoom<br />

c. U. S. Prison Camp, McNeil Island, Steilacoom<br />

d. Indian Tribal Courts<br />

4. State offenders<br />

a. Board of Prison Terms and Parole<br />

b. State Department of Institutions<br />

Division of Probation and Parole<br />

(i)<br />

Division of Adult Correction<br />

(2)<br />

Washington Corrections Center, Shelton<br />

(a<br />

Reception center<br />

i.<br />

Training center<br />

2.<br />

Washington Penitentiary, Walla Walla<br />

(b<br />

Washington State Reformatory, Monroe<br />

(c<br />

Honor Camps at Clearwater, Larch Mountain,<br />

(d<br />

Okan0gan,Washougal<br />

Honor Farms at Monroe and Walla Walla<br />

(e<br />

Women'sPrison, now at Walla Walla<br />

(f<br />

facility under construction at Purdy)<br />

(New<br />

Division of Juvenile Rehabilitation<br />

(3)<br />

Facilities and schools<br />

(a<br />

Cascadia Juvenile Reception and<br />

i.<br />

Center, Tacoma<br />

Diagnostic<br />

Fort Worden Treatment Center, POrt<br />

2.<br />

Townsend<br />

Greenhill School (male), Chehalis<br />

3.<br />

Maple Lane School (female), Grand Mound<br />

4.<br />

Echo Glen School, Preston<br />

5.<br />

Youth Camps<br />

(b<br />

Spruce Canyon, Colville<br />

I.<br />

Cedar Creek, Little Rock<br />

2.<br />

300


Youth Camps (continued)<br />

(b<br />

Mission.Creek, Belfair<br />

3.<br />

Naselle<br />

4.<br />

Indian Ridge (Older Boys), Arlington<br />

5.<br />

Group Homes<br />

(c<br />

Woodinville<br />

i.<br />

Riverside, Tacoma<br />

2.<br />

Ephrata (boys)<br />

3.<br />

Oak Ridge (girls),Lakewood<br />

4.<br />

Canyon View (boys), East Wenatchee<br />

5.<br />

(d Juvenile Parole Offices<br />

5. County-city youth facilities, detention homes<br />

6. County courts and adult jails<br />

Probation and Parole service<br />

a.<br />

Cedar Hills Alcoholism Program<br />

b.<br />

c. Jail services<br />

7. Municipal courts and adult jails<br />

a.<br />

Work release<br />

Probation and parole services<br />

b.<br />

Jail services<br />

c.<br />

8. Tribal Courts, Neah Bay, Taholah, Toppenish, Spokane<br />

School/Vocational Rehabilitation Cooperative Programs<br />

9.<br />

needs<br />

Seattle<br />

I0. Citizen Involvement<br />

a.<br />

Facilities<br />

Halfway houses<br />

(i)<br />

Work and study release facilities<br />

(2)<br />

M-2 Program job therapy<br />

(3)<br />

First Avenue Service Center<br />

(4)<br />

Pioneer Industries<br />

(5)<br />

Friends of Youth<br />

(6)<br />

Jewish Homes<br />

(7)<br />

Catholic Homes<br />

(8)<br />

Lutheran Homes<br />

(9)<br />

Atlantic Street Center<br />

(I0)<br />

Other programs including Model Cities<br />

(ii)<br />

IV. Eligibility Case Finding, Referral Sources<br />

Characteristics of the Public Offender: Most public offenders<br />

Ao<br />

meet the criteria for services as provided by the 1965<br />

can<br />

to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act. However,<br />

Amendments<br />

eligibility does have to be documented, using medical,<br />

this<br />

301


Bo<br />

Co<br />

DQ<br />

No<br />

or psychological reports. Most of these clients<br />

psychiatric<br />

exhibit a behavioral disorder, persisting over a period<br />

will<br />

time and manifesting itself in various settings, such as<br />

of<br />

on the job, before the courts and the family. In<br />

schools,<br />

instances it may be necessary to supplement psychiatric<br />

some<br />

psychological evaluations with reports from a variety<br />

and/or<br />

examiners and observers, such as teachers, employers,<br />

of<br />

officers, official service agencies or law enforce-<br />

probation<br />

agencies, It is anticipated that a report of the Insti-<br />

ment<br />

for Rehabilitation Services, being held in May 1969 at<br />

tute<br />

Nebraska, will form a solid basis for assisting in<br />

Lincoln,<br />

determination of eligibility in accordance with the 1968<br />

the<br />

Amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act.<br />

Finding: It is anticipated that procedures will be<br />

Case<br />

out in each district to facilitate the identification<br />

worked<br />

those persons, adult, juvenile, felon, or misdemeanant,<br />

of<br />

would profit by services of the rehabilitation counselor<br />

that<br />

with correctional rehabilitation responsibilities.<br />

charged<br />

lack of interest in selfimprovement is often character-<br />

Since<br />

of this clientele, motivational activities will be posi-<br />

istic<br />

pursued.<br />

tively<br />

Sources: Most active referrals will be correctional<br />

Referral<br />

courts at several levels and the probation and<br />

institutions,<br />

services in the adult and juvenile field. It is not<br />

parole<br />

that these be the only referral sources. Both<br />

intended<br />

and private agencies often are working with these<br />

public<br />

either specifica-ly about illegal activities or in<br />

clients,<br />

with some other problems. If it is appropriate,<br />

connection<br />

clients may be referred to the correctional rehabili-<br />

such<br />

counselors. There may be times when the general case-<br />

tation<br />

counselor would more appropriately receive referrals.<br />

load<br />

for Diagnostic Services: It is assumed that most<br />

Eligibility<br />

have eligibility for diagnostic servicesand the<br />

referrals<br />

needs for diagnosis should be identified immediately.<br />

specific<br />

services are identified as needed for diagnostic purposes.<br />

Many<br />

any of the needs as identified are prohibited by the state<br />

If<br />

the possibility of supplying these needs through<br />

manual,<br />

15 funds as discussed in paragraph V-F below or from<br />

Section<br />

agencies should be explored. Providing needed<br />

private<br />

services immediately is crucial with these clients.<br />

for services under rehabilitation plan: Since<br />

Eligibility<br />

basic eligibility for services needed in a rehabilitation<br />

the<br />

is a requirement for any extensive services, it is impera-<br />

plan<br />

that this determination be made at the earliest possible<br />

tive<br />

For those cases which are referred from the institution,<br />

date.<br />

often there will be up-to-date medical, psychiatric,<br />

quite<br />

psychological data which will support a finding of eligibility.<br />

302


Fo<br />

Go<br />

not, this information will be obtained prior to release<br />

If<br />

the institution. This then provides a basis for the<br />

from<br />

receiving the case in the community to provide<br />

counselor<br />

immediate services. Eligibility for those received<br />

almost<br />

the community will not usually be as easy to determine<br />

from<br />

there is more likelihood that the necessary reports<br />

because<br />

not be available for making the determination. Proce-<br />

will<br />

for obtaining a necessary documentation will be worked<br />

dures<br />

to expedite its determination. If extended evaluation<br />

out<br />

required, determination will be made early and documented<br />

is<br />

so that needed services may be provided for expeditiously.<br />

for rehabilitation services: Once basic eligi-<br />

Feasibility<br />

has been determined the next consideration is the<br />

bility<br />

of providing rehabilitation services. Since<br />

feasibility<br />

of interest or lack of follow-through on the part of the<br />

lack<br />

for services arranged is one of the characteristics<br />

client<br />

the disability and will be treated similarly to any other<br />

of<br />

This characteristic will not be used as the<br />

disability.<br />

basis for terminating services.<br />

sole<br />

for rehabilitation services: Need for rehabilitation<br />

Need<br />

will be determined as provided by the manual. The<br />

services<br />

in cooperation with the client will determine total<br />

counselor<br />

and then a decision and an agreement with the client<br />

needs<br />

be made as to what part of these needs will be furnished<br />

will<br />

the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and which will<br />

by<br />

furnished by the client himself, or other agency. The<br />

be<br />

of the whole family of the client will be taken into<br />

needs<br />

consideration in making these determinations.<br />

State of Washington<br />

Need<br />

Estimated<br />

for<br />

RehabilitationProfessional Personnel<br />

Correctional<br />

1975<br />

in<br />

following estimates of need for correctional rehabilitation<br />

The<br />

are based on the following assumptions:<br />

personnel<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation wants to have a comprehensive<br />

i)<br />

rehabilitation (CR) program in operation<br />

correctional<br />

by 1975.<br />

303


Counselors will not be required to accept unmanageable<br />

2)<br />

(Until further experience has been gained,<br />

caseloads.<br />

is believed a counselor should have no more than<br />

it<br />

[50] active cases at one time.)<br />

fifty<br />

A definite functional responsibility will be assigned to<br />

3)<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation district for the correc-<br />

each<br />

tional rehabilitation within the district.<br />

Specialized personnel will handle offender caseloads<br />

4)<br />

the district, usually with this being the major<br />

within<br />

responsibility of that personnel.<br />

Until firmly established, the CR program will be super-<br />

5)<br />

at the state level.<br />

vised<br />

Any program expanded on a comprehensive statewide basis<br />

6)<br />

have to be flexible in staff assignments and funding<br />

will<br />

support.<br />

Priorities will have to be set at the state level with<br />

7)<br />

of the Directorof the Department of Institu-<br />

concurrence<br />

tions and the Director of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation District I<br />

served: Grays Harbor, Mason, Thurston, Lewis, Wahkiakum,<br />

Counties<br />

Skamania, Klickitat, Clark<br />

Cowlitz,<br />

served: Federal,- state.and nuvenile probation and parole;<br />

Institutions<br />

Corrections Center; Maple Lane School, Green Hill<br />

Washington<br />

Staff Required:<br />

Larch Mountain and Washougal Honor Camps; District<br />

School;<br />

Juvenile Courts; Skokomish Indian Reservation; Shoal-<br />

Courts;<br />

water Indian Reservation<br />

Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional Rehabili-<br />

(i)<br />

tation<br />

Counselor for federal offenders (Vancouver)<br />

()<br />

Counselor for federal offenders (Olympia)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for juveniles and misdemeanants (Vancouver)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for juveniles and misdemeanants (Olympia)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for all offenders (Aberdeen)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselors for Washington Corrections Center (Shelton)<br />

(3)<br />

Counselor for Maple Lane and Green Hill Schools (Chehalis)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for •uvenile delinquency prevention (Olympia)<br />

(i)<br />

304


Vocational Rehabilitation Districtll<br />

Counties served: Jefferson, Clallam, Kitsap, Pierce<br />

served: Federal, state and juvenile probation andparole;<br />

Institutions<br />

S. Penitentiary and Prison Camp, McNeil Island; Cascadia<br />

U.<br />

Staff Required:<br />

Center; Fort Worden, Mission Creek Forest Camp;<br />

Diagnostic<br />

Canyon; oakridge (Lakewood); Pioneer (Tacoma); River-<br />

Spruce<br />

Women's Corrections Center (Purdy); Neah Bay Tribal<br />

side;<br />

Clearwater Tribal Court; Hoh Indian Reservation; Ozette<br />

Court;<br />

Reservation; Quillayute Indian Reservation; U. S.<br />

Indian<br />

District Courts.<br />

Court;<br />

Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />

(I)<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Counselor for federal offenders (Tacoma)<br />

(I)<br />

Counselors for McNeil Island Penitentiary and Prison<br />

(5)<br />

Camp<br />

Counselors for State probation and parole (Tacoma)<br />

(2)<br />

Counselor for juvenile probation and parole (Tacoma)<br />

(1)<br />

Counselors for district courts (misdemeanants) (Tacoma,<br />

(2)<br />

Bremerton)<br />

Counselor for Cascadia (Tacoma)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for Oakridge, Pioneer and Riverside (Tacoma)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for juvenile delinquency prevention (Tacoma)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for all offenders, including Neah Bay Tribal<br />

(i)<br />

(Port Angeles)<br />

Court<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation District III<br />

County served: King<br />

Served: Federal, state, juvenile and King County ro-<br />

Institutions<br />

and parole; King County Jail, Seattle City Jail;<br />

bation<br />

Staff Required:<br />

municipal, district and U. S. Courts; halfway<br />

juvenile,<br />

Central Area Vocational Rehabilitation Office;<br />

houses;<br />

Center; Model Cities; Woodinville Group Home;<br />

Miti-Service<br />

Glen Children's Center; Cedar Hills Alcoholism Treat-<br />

Echo<br />

ment Center.<br />

Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />

(i)<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Counselors for federal probation and parole (located<br />

(2)<br />

Chief U. S. @robation Officer)<br />

with<br />

Counselor for federal parolees (McNeil Island and<br />

(i)<br />

Seattle)<br />

305


Counselors for State probationers and parolees<br />

(3)<br />

Counselor for juvenile probation and parole<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for Juvenile court<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for Echo Glen<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for Cedar Hills<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for juvenile delinquency prevention<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for Central Area Vocational Rehabilitation and<br />

(i)<br />

Cities<br />

Model<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation District IV<br />

Counties served: Snohomish, Skagit, Island, San Juan, Whatcom<br />

served: Federal, state and juvenile probation and parole;<br />

Institutions<br />

State Reformatory; district and juvenile courts;<br />

Washington<br />

Staff required:<br />

Indian Reservation; Lummi Tribal Court; Indian Ridge<br />

Tulalip<br />

Camp (Arlington July 1969).<br />

Youth<br />

Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />

(i)<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Counselor for federal offenders (Everett)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselors for state.probation and parole, including<br />

(2)<br />

Indian Reservation (Everett and Bellingham)<br />

Tulalip<br />

Counselors for Washington State Reformatory (Monroe)<br />

(3)<br />

Counselors for juvenile probation and parole (Everett<br />

(2)<br />

Bellingham)<br />

and<br />

Counselor for juvenile delinquency prevention (Everett)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for all offenders (Skagit, Whatcom and San<br />

(i)<br />

Juan Counties) (Bellingham)<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation District V<br />

served: Chelan, Okanogan, Douglas, Ferry, Adams, Pend Oreille,<br />

Counties<br />

Spokane, Stevens Whitman Grant<br />

Lincoln,<br />

served: Okanogan Honor Camp; Federal, state and juvenile<br />

Institutions<br />

and parole; Canyon View (boys East Wenachee,<br />

probation<br />

Staff Required:<br />

Ephrata Group Home; U. S. Courts; District Courts;<br />

1969);<br />

Tribal Court; Colville Indian Reservation; Kalispel<br />

Spokane<br />

Indian Reservation<br />

Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional Rehabili-<br />

(i)<br />

tation<br />

Counselor for federal offenders<br />

(I)<br />

Counselorsfor state probation and parole (Spokane and<br />

(2)<br />

Wenatchee)<br />

306


Counselors for uvenile probation and parole (Spokane<br />

(2)<br />

Wenatchee)<br />

and<br />

Counselor for misdemeanants (Spokane)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for Indian courts and reservations (Spokane)<br />

(i)<br />

Counselor for all offenders (Grant, Adams and Whitman<br />

(i)<br />

(Pullman)<br />

Counties)<br />

Vocational RehabilitationDistrictVl<br />

served: Kittitas, Columbia, Yakima, Walla Walla, Benton,<br />

Counties<br />

Franklin, Asotin<br />

Garfield,<br />

Served: Federal, state and juvenile probation and parole;<br />

Institutions<br />

State Penitentiary (Walla Walla); District Courts,<br />

Washington<br />

Staff Required<br />

Juvenile Courts; Yakima Tribal Court<br />

Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />

(i)<br />

ion<br />

Rehabilitat<br />

Counselor for federal offenders, including Yakima<br />

(i)<br />

Court (Yakima)<br />

Tribal<br />

Counselors for Washington State Penitentiary (Walla Walla)<br />

(3)<br />

Counselors for juvenile probation and parole (Yakima<br />

(2)<br />

Tri-Cities)<br />

and<br />

Counselors for state probation and parole (Yakima and<br />

(2)<br />

Tri-Cities)<br />

STATE SUPERVISORY STAFF<br />

State Supervisor of Correctional Rehabilitation Services<br />

Consultant for Adult Correctional Programs<br />

i.<br />

Consultant for Juvenile Correctional Programs<br />

2.<br />

Consultant for Federal Correctional Programs,<br />

3.<br />

Tribal Courts<br />

including<br />

Supervisor of Vocational Rehabilitation Services (.Institutions)<br />

307


State of Washington<br />

CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES<br />

TOTAL ESTIMATEDPERSONNEL NEEDS IN 1975<br />

State Level Vocational Rehabilitation 4<br />

State Level Institutions<br />

District I counselors II<br />

District II counselors 16.<br />

District III counselors 13<br />

District IV counselors ii<br />

District V dounselors<br />

District VI 9<br />

TOTAL 74<br />

308


of Washington<br />

State<br />

STATEWIDE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />

GOVERNOR'S<br />

Olympia<br />

MEETING OF RESEARCH PERSONNEL<br />

A<br />

of Washington September 8, 1967<br />

University<br />

APPENDIX E<br />

of State agencies and departments of the Univer-<br />

Representatives<br />

of Washington had an opportunity to exchange information about research<br />

sity<br />

in progress, program needs and services in a meeting arranged by<br />

currently<br />

C. Carson, Project Director, and held at the University of Washington<br />

David<br />

on Friday, September 8.<br />

meeting was called by David W. Peyton, Administrative Assistant<br />

The<br />

Governor Evans, and Chairman of the Commission, and Mr. Carson, Commission<br />

to<br />

Project Director.<br />

a common concern and interest in areas of service related<br />

Sharing<br />

vocational rehabilitation were the following persons who attended the<br />

to<br />

meeting<br />

Attending from the University of Washington:<br />

Jerald Forster, University of Washington Rehabilitation Counseling Education<br />

Dr.<br />

Irwin G. Sarason, Project Director, University of Washington Department of Psychol.<br />

Dr.<br />

Manzer John Griswold, Research Director, Rehab. Research Institute, U. of W.<br />

Dr.<br />

John M. Palmer, Speech and Hearing Clinic<br />

Dr.<br />

Henry W. Maier, Professor, School of Social Work<br />

Dr.<br />

Jerome R. Miller, School of Social Work<br />

Dr.<br />

Elizabeth C. Giblin, Professor, School of Nursing<br />

Dr.<br />

Laurie M. Gunter, School of Nursing<br />

Dr.<br />

Harold L. Fish, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Seattle, and U. of W.<br />

Mr.<br />

Norris Go Haring, MRCD Center<br />

Dr.<br />

Dr. Thomas F. Lewis, School of SocialWork<br />

Attending from State Agencies Olympia<br />

Valerie Brakel, Supervisor, State Services for the Blind, Public Assistance<br />

Mrs.<br />

Wallace Lane, Deputy Director, Washington State Department of Health<br />

Dr.<br />

Tom Anderson,State Department of Health<br />

Dr.<br />

Alan W. Metcalf, Director of Research, Superintendent of Public Instruction's Off.<br />

Dr.<br />

Merlyn S. Matthews, Federal Offenders Rehabilitation Program<br />

Dr.<br />

Mack Knutsen, Supervisor, Division of Planning, Department of Institutions<br />

Dr.<br />

Irvin F. Bryan, upervisor of Planning, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Mr.<br />

John M. Willits, Supervisor, Youth Development & Conservation Corps, State Parks &<br />

Mr.<br />

Recreation<br />

Payson Jeynes, District Supervisor, Vocational Adjustment Services, Division of<br />

Mr.<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

Vocational<br />

John D. Lane, Chief Medical Consultant, Medical Section, Dept. of Labor & Industries<br />

Dr.<br />

Duane S. Stookey, Supervisor of Industrial Insurance, Dept. of Labor & Industries<br />

Mr.<br />

Robert H. Leahy, State Medical Director, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Dr.<br />

Robert A. Anderson, Manager, Business & Economic Research Div. Dept. of Commerce &<br />

Mr.<br />

Development<br />

Economic<br />

310


Attending om State Agencies Olympia (cont'd)<br />

Jean Mead, Research Analyst, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Mrs.<br />

Maurice Powers, Planning and Procedures, Department of Public Assistance<br />

Mr.<br />

Ernest Kramer, Director, Division of Vocational Education<br />

Mr.<br />

Edward E. Ryan, Department of Public Assistance<br />

Mr.<br />

Norman N. Gibson, Research Analyst, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Mr.<br />

Norman C. Richardson, Director, Community College Board<br />

Dr.<br />

Mr. L. P. Kirry, Acting Director, Planning and Community Affairs Agency<br />

Others:<br />

Sherman Pinto, Member, Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />

Mrs.<br />

W. Phillip Strawn, Washington State Research Council, Director<br />

Mr.<br />

Orego.n<br />

Mr. Cleveland Anschell, Consulting Services Corporation<br />

Mr. Dan W. Schausten, Project Director, Oregon Planning Committee for Voc. Rehab.<br />

Mr. Carson presided at the meeting.<br />

University, in its schools.and colleges, is developing or already<br />

The<br />

educational degrees at bachelor, master and doctoral levels to meet<br />

offering<br />

demand for training personnel in the fields of rehabilitation and allied<br />

the<br />

of service. Research projects of great range and variety are part of a<br />

areas<br />

continuing search for program innovations.<br />

agencies, i.e., the various departments of state government,<br />

Service<br />

to benefit from programs at the University. They employ the trained<br />

stand<br />

use the research findings, and seek technical assistance for their<br />

graduates,<br />

research undertakings. By a feedback of their own needs and staffing<br />

own<br />

they tend to influence program planning and curriculum at the Uni-<br />

problems<br />

in a mutually profitable exchange of service and information.<br />

versity<br />

discussions developed at the meeting centered around general<br />

The<br />

of existing or planned programs.<br />

descriptions<br />

-O-<br />

Department of Psychology at the University is currently developing<br />

The<br />

training program, according to Dr. Sarason, to which it hopes to admit students<br />

a<br />

doctoral degrees in 1968. The program which will prepare students to work<br />

for<br />

the areas of crime, delinquency, and physical handicaps is finding qualified<br />

in<br />

staff in very short supply. Another stumbling block is the lack of<br />

teaching<br />

personnel in workshops and rehabilitation facilities which would<br />

supervisory<br />

be used in the student training programs.<br />

Forster commented that the University can turn out graduates,<br />

Dr,<br />

if salaries in the state are not improved, Washington will continue to<br />

but<br />

people for California and other states. Graduates with M.A. Degrees<br />

train<br />

coming out of the counselor training program, but never in sufficient<br />

are<br />

numbers to fill the need in WashingtonState. He introduced the subject of<br />

311


people who have been used successfully in various programs<br />

subprofessional<br />

teacher aides, hospital helpers, and in community programs of the Office<br />

as<br />

Economic Opportunity. Surveys of professional people frequently show<br />

of<br />

using their time in activities that untrained people could do for them.<br />

them<br />

Jeynes said that the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation had<br />

Mr.<br />

training teacher aides in small numbers through courses set up in one<br />

been<br />

of the community colleges.<br />

Knutson, in reply to a question, said that the Department of<br />

Dr.<br />

has some 12,000 employees, most of them with high school di-<br />

Institutions<br />

plomas, but some with less.<br />

Sarason thought research in the employment of subprofessionals<br />

Dr.<br />

be helpful and cited examples from a research project at the Cascade<br />

would<br />

and Research Center where youthful offenders are being schooled<br />

Disagnostic<br />

socially acceptable behavior. Research might be helpful in defining the<br />

in<br />

kind of subprofessional most useful in a therapeutic situation, he suggested.<br />

Mathews described the vocational rehabilitation program dealing<br />

Mrs.<br />

federal offenders and some of the research methods being followed to see<br />

with<br />

the services of a vocational rehabilitation counselor will reduce re-<br />

whether<br />

among adult offenders. In at least two instances, subprofessionals<br />

cidivism<br />

are helping the trained counselors in this program.<br />

Kramer said that the vocational education program which trains<br />

Mr.<br />

people is aware that these subprofessionals are able to make<br />

subprofessional<br />

substantial contributions in the area of rehabilitation.<br />

Griswold is using graduate students with experience in voca-<br />

Dr.<br />

rehabilitation in a study and evaluation of the usefulness of family<br />

tional<br />

for vocational rehabilitation clients in state programs. Students<br />

counseling<br />

looking at family involvement, at the experiences of clients from different<br />

are<br />

of family life, and data from agency R-300 reporting forms to show<br />

cycloes<br />

has happened to the client during the last fiscal year. He feels that<br />

what<br />

study, is producing a great deal of useful information and that the results<br />

the<br />

the project should be helpful to agencies by helping them understand their<br />

of<br />

operations. Dr. Griswold said he is also interested in how agency con-<br />

own<br />

should be evaluated. Some graduate students are looking into this<br />

tributions<br />

one of the questions being explored is why a number of excellent demon-<br />

and<br />

have not "caught fire" and been put to use by agencies.<br />

strations<br />

Forster agreed that failure to use research findings was a<br />

Dr.<br />

He cited Tacoma Goodwill as an excellent example of applied research.<br />

problem.<br />

designed research abstracts, he thought, have a place in carrying useful<br />

Well<br />

to the executive level. Innovations often involve considerable<br />

information<br />

risk.<br />

Metcalf pointed to this as a key issue in programs supported<br />

Dr.<br />

public funds. The risk factor is closely related to research findings and<br />

by<br />

their use by agencies.<br />

Hating described the new mental retardation and child development<br />

Dr.<br />

where basic research will become applied research in settings very much<br />

center<br />

312


natural classrooms used from preschool through high school. Here inno-<br />

like<br />

from basic research laboratories will be refined, developed and applied<br />

vations<br />

a controlled experimental situation. Teachers, counselors and psychologists<br />

in<br />

work in the facility. Last year, in temporary quarters 200 college stu-<br />

will<br />

from undergraduate to doctoral levels, participated in the program.<br />

dents,<br />

observed. Others conducted research projects° They came from a variety<br />

Some<br />

disciplines pediatrics, psychology, medicine, special education, nursing<br />

of<br />

and others.<br />

education<br />

Lane asked how. research could be implemented, and hoped some<br />

Dr.<br />

would be forthcoming.<br />

answers<br />

Forster thought that locating research functions directly under<br />

Dr.<br />

head of the'state agency was a helpful step and mentioned that the division<br />

the<br />

research in the department of institutions reported to that agency's director,<br />

of<br />

Conte.<br />

Dr.<br />

Kirry described the functions of the new State Planning and<br />

Mr.<br />

Affairs Agency, created by the 1967 Legislature as a staff agency<br />

Community<br />

the office of the Governor. A prime function of the new agency will be<br />

in<br />

assist the Governor in pulling together the planning and programming<br />

to<br />

state government and to serve in a liaison and coordinating capacity<br />

within<br />

state and local government planning activities. A small staff will call<br />

for<br />

state boards and agencies for help in reducing and digesting specialized<br />

on<br />

for use by the Governor. Within the new agency a State Planning<br />

information<br />

will be concerned with plans and programs within state government;<br />

Division<br />

Community Affairs Division will look to interrelationships between state<br />

a<br />

local government; and a Research Division will take on the functions of<br />

and<br />

State Census Board.<br />

the<br />

Elizabeth Giblin spoke of research projects in the School of<br />

Dr.<br />

Of particular interest to rehabilitation workers is a program<br />

Nursing.<br />

prepares teachers, supervisors, andothers to work with the mentally<br />

which<br />

and another training program in rehabilitation nursing financed<br />

retarded,<br />

by a Federal grant, for teachers, administrators and consultants.<br />

Gunter added that putting research into practice is.a problem<br />

Dr.<br />

the School of Nursing as it is with other programs.<br />

in<br />

Richardson mentioned two-year RN training programs which are<br />

Dr.<br />

in the community colleges and said that almost all of the estab-<br />

available<br />

community,colleges have LPN courses. Students may also attend com-<br />

lished<br />

colleges for their first year of nurses' training and transfer to<br />

munity<br />

the University for the four-year course.<br />

Fish said that the Seattle Office of the Division of Voca-<br />

Mr.<br />

Rehabilitation worked very. closely with programs at the University,<br />

tional<br />

those of the School of Nursing and the Department of Physical<br />

especially<br />

and Rehabilitation.<br />

Medicine<br />

Division of the Blind, Mrs. Brakel said, is looking toward<br />

The<br />

closer relationship with Dr. Forster's program in the Fall.<br />

a<br />

313


Stookey of the Department of Labor and Industry described<br />

Mr.<br />

agency's concern with physical disability and the rehabilitation of the<br />

that<br />

workman. Physical restoration measures used at the Dr. Buckner Center<br />

injured<br />

largely successful. The interest of the Department in the vocational re-<br />

are<br />

habilitation program is assured, he said.<br />

Anderson saw a comprehensive health services center as a real<br />

Dr.<br />

in the rehabilitation process for Labor and Industries and others<br />

need<br />

a rehabilitation team would evaluate the extent of services needed to<br />

where<br />

disability and return clients to employment. Such a facility is in<br />

overcome<br />

planning stages now. When asked about job information for clients with<br />

the<br />

handicaps, Dr. Anderson said he thought this was available through<br />

specific<br />

the Employment Security Department.<br />

Carson called on Mr. Willits who described the State Parks<br />

Mr.<br />

which has as its primary concern the provision of opportunities for<br />

program<br />

recreation for the people of the State,. the handicapped among them.<br />

outdoor<br />

the beginning of the poverty program a statewide youth corps program<br />

Since<br />

been providing job opportunities to approximately 1500 young men and<br />

has<br />

many of them clients of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />

women,<br />

new MDTA program is to provide career training in recreation for disabled<br />

A<br />

people.<br />

Bryan referred back to the morning session of the meeting, saying<br />

Mr.<br />

what he heard there reminded him of something that used to be called<br />

that<br />

rehabilitation" and which involved the entire family. He saw a client<br />

"total<br />

service agency, such as the Division, experiencing difficulties in<br />

oriented<br />

the Federal program within the DVR state plan, state law, and<br />

accommodating<br />

State Constitution itself.<br />

the<br />

Metcalf expressed the belief that one of the Commission's<br />

Dr.<br />

is defining the scope of their study. Dr. Haring added the need<br />

problems<br />

determine the incidence of the handicapped. Dr. Forster asked what<br />

to<br />

of the handicapped was being used. Dr. Palmer called attention<br />

definition<br />

the published Rehabilitation Codes prepared by Maya Riviere under a<br />

to<br />

grant and which define impairments and disabilities.<br />

Federal<br />

Schausten reported on the work of the Oregon Statewide Planning<br />

Mr.<br />

and on the cooperative agreement which exists between Oregon and<br />

Commission<br />

Washington.<br />

in a second meeting of the group was expressed, possibly<br />

Interest<br />

specific areas of discussion defined in an agenda prepared and circu-<br />

with<br />

lated before the meeting.<br />

the close of the meeting, Mrs. Pinto, as the only representative<br />

At<br />

the Statewide Planning Commission present, said she hoped a second session<br />

of<br />

of the group would be attended by more Commission members.<br />

report of the meeting was prepared by Jean Mead from notes<br />

This<br />

by Mary Simila, Administrative Secretary of the Planning Commission.<br />

taken<br />

314

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!