Untitled - NCRTM
Untitled - NCRTM
Untitled - NCRTM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- ,: < VOCATIONAL" REHBILITATION DEF[N<br />
e!{ th}+ enes Of" SClCeS deglgned to make eloyab[ those who.h¢ a vation<br />
Va9<br />
Te:: of vOon rhno,bt e d!sabled, ty, d the tate<br />
gOtc<br />
: PgSdg2.-sdlsty mas+a tofssl . dos .ysicN or mentN #ltro, whch-.-<br />
qetl0n qeligN f23ndivluats wth pfihmN ,ggies mast..be based upon comt<br />
Th6<br />
6mo¢,except :i] an adeqo¢_ psytoge+ "evatl :may-b@ substed in: behavior<br />
yejc<br />
&sor@ 3sg4 " e'hara6ted hy.etans bNafdr or iair,, aty: t car out.<br />
ts¢ reta£tig must'Be based on aqatR-pso[ogteat eVUNisng standrdmed.=<br />
A<br />
tStL antigence. (eg . }fi With;respect/to e 0 sceNone the<br />
lndlvldy(m&ijed<br />
range 5::7071s oe of aer>,[-ehHlty+.r vocatmnal gehab!n, .TNo or three "ONe: in each<br />
!] g; vt,bN +rehaift,n -sces.was roa to-mde (1) khe. met, andpheXaa:dt¢ldffNs<br />
n<br />
soflbv VoctionN:Rehihtatmn () IMidNs s--<br />
trffdNofi)<br />
bn U los pr;gNie or:s seriom restriction :su fidds, nvstausf oes!ve<br />
to e.BiNd;.2a;:@.,e.at.e:gnt. of:bhe Assfan. of e StaSe.of-WasNom
FINAL REPORT<br />
STATEWIDE PLANNING FOR<br />
COMPREHENSIVE<br />
REHABILITATION SERVICES<br />
VOCATIONAL<br />
STATE OF WASHINGTON<br />
C. CARSON<br />
DAVID<br />
Director<br />
Project<br />
PLANNING COMMISSION<br />
STATEWIDE<br />
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
FOR<br />
Capitol Center Bldg.<br />
610<br />
Washington.<br />
Olympia,<br />
Period of Planning Project<br />
Inclusive<br />
23, 1967 May 22, 1969<br />
May<br />
plannlng program was supported by a grant, under Section 4(a).(2) (b),<br />
This<br />
the Rehabilitation Services Administration, Social and Rehabilitation<br />
from<br />
Service, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C.
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Chapter Page No.<br />
I SUMMARY<br />
II INTRODUCTION<br />
InformatiOn o__n Establishment o__f<br />
Backsround<br />
Planning Program<br />
Statewide<br />
Scope<br />
Objectives<br />
The Promise and Reality o__f Rehabilitation<br />
,Sym_P0sium<br />
Planning<br />
Agency<br />
Promise and Reality of Rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
Planning David C. Carson<br />
Agency<br />
for Psychological Service Needs in<br />
Planning<br />
Centers R. Kenneth Barnes..<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Relationship Between State and Local<br />
Potential<br />
Associations and Vocational<br />
Psychological<br />
Statewide Planning Salvatore G.<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
13<br />
DiMichael<br />
Aspects of Research in Personnel<br />
Relevant<br />
and Training- Jeffrey G. Shapiro..<br />
Selection<br />
Servicesand Community Action<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Guy A. Renzaglia<br />
Programs-<br />
III THE PLANNING ORGANIZATION<br />
Designated Or,ganization 37<br />
The Plannin$ Commission 37<br />
Statewide Advisory Committee 39<br />
Task Forces<br />
of responsibility<br />
Areas<br />
list of names see Appendix)<br />
(For<br />
16<br />
24<br />
39
Chapter Page No.<br />
IV<br />
Re$ional Committees<br />
of selection<br />
Method<br />
list of chairmen, see Appendix)<br />
(For<br />
Subcontractors<br />
Greenleigh Associates Inc.<br />
Legisi-ative Council<br />
Interasency L1alson<br />
and Facilities Planning Program,<br />
Workshop<br />
H. Jeynes<br />
Payson<br />
Cqmprehensive Health Planning<br />
Program Management Group<br />
at the universit of Washinston,<br />
Meeting<br />
1967 (For minutes, see Appendix)<br />
September,<br />
Services to the Deaf<br />
Agencies involved, purpose of council, etc..<br />
Trips to Rehabilitation Facilities<br />
The Staff<br />
Permanent<br />
and temporary<br />
Part-time<br />
Consulants<br />
Functions (Donated)<br />
Staff<br />
METHOD OF OPERATION<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
of Regions, selection of regional<br />
Determination<br />
selection of task forces, etc<br />
chairmen,<br />
Direction of task forces by Assistant Director..<br />
Description of task force responsibilities<br />
41<br />
41<br />
43<br />
43<br />
43<br />
44<br />
44<br />
44<br />
45<br />
45<br />
45<br />
45<br />
46<br />
47<br />
48<br />
50
Task Force Guidelines<br />
Task Force I The Prevalence of Disability...<br />
Force II Workshops-Facilities and<br />
Task<br />
Resources<br />
Task Force III- Interagency Coordination<br />
Force IV Vocational Training and<br />
Task<br />
Changes<br />
Technical<br />
Force V Barriers to Employment of the<br />
Task<br />
Handicapped<br />
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
of the Prevalence and Incidence of Handi-<br />
Estimates<br />
Persons<br />
capped<br />
Estimates of Vocational Rehabilitation Need<br />
The Physically Disabled<br />
Poverty<br />
Prevention of Disability<br />
State Institutions<br />
Adult Corrections<br />
State Hospitals<br />
Mental Retardation<br />
Juvenile Delinquency<br />
Sensory Handicapped<br />
Veterans' Facilities<br />
Implications<br />
Why the Need?<br />
Adequacy of Current Services<br />
Size of the Commitment<br />
Page No.<br />
51<br />
55<br />
61<br />
66<br />
72<br />
77<br />
80<br />
82<br />
92<br />
93<br />
94<br />
94<br />
¸95<br />
95<br />
96<br />
97<br />
98<br />
I00<br />
i00<br />
I00<br />
102
Rehabilitation?<br />
DVR Eligibility Requirements<br />
Disability<br />
Blind<br />
Deaf<br />
Dental Health<br />
Prosrams<br />
The Aging<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Correctional<br />
of Correctinl Pr.ogam<br />
Description<br />
A. Price<br />
Cecil<br />
to Conjugal'Visiting<br />
Alterna'tives<br />
Donald R. Johns, PhoD<br />
Economic Opportunity Programs<br />
and Workshops<br />
Facilities<br />
Rehabilitation Center<br />
Comprehensive<br />
Evaluation and Service Center<br />
Employment<br />
"Interim State Plan for_Workshops and<br />
From<br />
Facilities," by Payson H. Jeynes<br />
The Military Rejectee<br />
Assistance<br />
Public<br />
Statement E.M. Oliver<br />
by<br />
Migrants<br />
Security and Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Social<br />
by Donald Po Holden<br />
Statement<br />
Youth<br />
Disabled<br />
by Donald Hamilton<br />
Statement<br />
Workmen's Compensation<br />
Page No.<br />
102<br />
103<br />
107<br />
109<br />
109<br />
112<br />
117<br />
117<br />
i23<br />
130<br />
135<br />
136<br />
138<br />
147<br />
154<br />
154<br />
160<br />
160<br />
162<br />
164
nt.ergency Coordination of Service _rograms<br />
of Public Assistance, William Pope.<br />
Department<br />
for the Blind<br />
Services<br />
of Blindness<br />
Prevention<br />
Teacher-Counselor<br />
Employment Security Department, Mrs. Maxine Daly<br />
of Health<br />
Department<br />
Spielholz, M.D. and Rhesa Penn, M.D.<br />
Jess<br />
of Labor and Industries<br />
Department<br />
J. Petrie<br />
Harold<br />
of Institutions<br />
Department<br />
R. Conte, M.D.<br />
William<br />
State Employment Service<br />
MDTA Program<br />
Public Welfare<br />
Education ,...<br />
Voluntary Organizations<br />
Policy<br />
Manpower<br />
Rehabilitation as a Public Market<br />
Manpower<br />
Paul M. Ellwood, Jr., M.D<br />
Coordination with Other State Planning<br />
Poverty<br />
Mental Health Planning<br />
Retardation Planning<br />
Mental<br />
of Secondary Special Education<br />
Survey<br />
G. Newton Buker, Ph.D<br />
Regional Medical Program<br />
The<br />
Area Stroke Patient Bed Need<br />
Seattle<br />
Justus F. Lehmann, M.D<br />
Comprehensive Health Planning<br />
Government Reorganization<br />
.Administrative spect s<br />
Relations<br />
Public<br />
E. M. Oliver..<br />
Editorial,<br />
Pase No.<br />
167<br />
168<br />
169<br />
169<br />
170<br />
171<br />
175<br />
177<br />
182<br />
182<br />
182<br />
184<br />
184<br />
187<br />
187<br />
189<br />
192<br />
196<br />
199<br />
202<br />
203<br />
206<br />
206<br />
208<br />
-20g
and Operations Studies of<br />
Administrative<br />
Agency<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
House<br />
Harbridge<br />
Coordination Through Multi-<br />
Interagency<br />
Centers<br />
Service<br />
Centers<br />
Multi-Service<br />
New Concepts with Multi-Service Centers..<br />
Locations of the State<br />
Administrative<br />
Rehabilitation Agency<br />
Vocational<br />
Reorganization Priority" Inaugural<br />
"The<br />
Governor Daniel J. Evans<br />
Address,<br />
Recruitment, Training, and Utiliza-<br />
Personnel<br />
tion<br />
from "What New Programs and Which<br />
Excerpt<br />
Services?" H. J. Socolofsky<br />
New<br />
Needs in Rehabilitation, U. S.<br />
Personnel<br />
Education and Welfare<br />
Health<br />
Counselor Education Program<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
R. Forster, Ph.D<br />
Jerald<br />
of Completed Research<br />
Utilization<br />
the Information Explosion, Research<br />
Managing<br />
Brief, DHEW, 1969<br />
Special Plannin$ Topics<br />
Barriers<br />
Architectural<br />
Force V Report Bruce Johnson, Chairman<br />
Task<br />
Transportation<br />
to Congress<br />
Memorial.<br />
for the Blind<br />
Registry<br />
legislation<br />
Proposed<br />
National Rehabilitation Association<br />
Development and Placement<br />
Job<br />
from Report of Governor's Task Force<br />
Excerpts<br />
Executive Organization- Brewster C. Denny,<br />
on<br />
Chairman<br />
Vl THE COMPOSITE WORKING PLAN<br />
The Size of the Problem<br />
Pase N °<br />
Financing 239<br />
211<br />
212<br />
212<br />
213<br />
214<br />
215<br />
215<br />
217<br />
218<br />
219<br />
222<br />
223<br />
225<br />
226<br />
227<br />
227<br />
228<br />
229<br />
231<br />
.231<br />
232<br />
Z37<br />
237
Personnel to do the Job<br />
Training Programs<br />
Sabbatical Leave<br />
Manasement Study<br />
Record Keeping<br />
and Cooperation Amon$ Asencies<br />
Coordination<br />
Patterns of Service<br />
Better<br />
Government....<br />
Evaluation and Service Centers<br />
Employment<br />
the Disadvantaged<br />
for<br />
Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center<br />
Multi-Service Centers<br />
Dr. H. T. Buckner Rehabilitation Center<br />
The<br />
Injured Workmen, Seattle<br />
for<br />
Coordination with Education<br />
Rehabilitation and Health<br />
Seattle Artificial Kidney Center<br />
Blind<br />
Migrant Workers<br />
Indians<br />
Labor Orsanizations<br />
The Public Served<br />
How Shall Services be Delivered?<br />
A Needed Assessment of the Federal Prosram<br />
Why. the Emphasis on Vocational Rehabilitation?..<br />
Page No.<br />
242<br />
243<br />
244<br />
244<br />
245<br />
245<br />
245<br />
247<br />
248<br />
248<br />
249<br />
249<br />
250<br />
251<br />
251<br />
252<br />
252<br />
253<br />
253<br />
254<br />
256<br />
257<br />
258
REFERENCES<br />
APPENDICES<br />
Will Disability Rates Rise or Diminish?<br />
A Look at Washington Rehabilitants<br />
Lead Time in Staffin$<br />
Information GapBe$ins Early<br />
Directory<br />
APPENDIX A- Organizational Chart<br />
APPENDIX B Chairmen of Regional Committees..<br />
APPENDIX C Advisory Committees ..<br />
D Proposed Comprehensive Correctional<br />
APPENDIX<br />
Plan for Public Offenders<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Percy Bell and Gecil A. Price<br />
E A Meeting of Research Personnel<br />
APPENDIX<br />
of Washington, September 8, 1967.<br />
University<br />
Page No.<br />
259<br />
260<br />
264<br />
265<br />
266<br />
272<br />
278<br />
280<br />
282<br />
283<br />
298<br />
310
CHAPTER I<br />
SUMMARY<br />
particular chapter is printed separately. It contains<br />
This<br />
brief description of the project and all of the recommendations of<br />
a<br />
Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation for changes in<br />
the<br />
delivery of services to the handicapped and disadvantaged citizens<br />
the<br />
the state. Partially because of the timing at the end of the second<br />
of<br />
of thetwo-year project, it has been necessary that this longer<br />
year<br />
report, REHABILITATION ADVANCE, be bound without the summary chapter.<br />
distribution of the longer volume will be to libraries,<br />
The<br />
agencies both federal and state, offices of Vocational<br />
government<br />
and a few others. The summary volume which will be<br />
Rehabilitaton,<br />
in greater quantity will be distributed to all those receiving<br />
printed<br />
larger volume, plus many other people in the power structure of<br />
the<br />
state. Inquiries concerning these two volumes should be addressed<br />
the<br />
to Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, P. O. Box 528, Olympia ,98501<br />
are thus following the requirements in the Federal guide-<br />
We<br />
which state:<br />
lines,<br />
an essential means of achieving the objective of provid<br />
As<br />
rehabilitation services to all handicapped persons by<br />
ing<br />
i, 1975, or earlier, the State shall publish and<br />
July<br />
distribute the information contained in the final<br />
widely<br />
to the groups and organizations participating in<br />
report<br />
planning, to other interested groups and to the public<br />
the<br />
at<br />
large.
CHAPTER II<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
BackgroundInformation o__nEstablishment o__f Statewide PlanningProgram<br />
1965 Amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act,<br />
The<br />
Public Law 89-333, authorized a two-year program of grants<br />
Federal<br />
states to help plan the development of comprehensive vocational<br />
to<br />
services. The maximum annual grant to any one state<br />
rehabilitation<br />
$I00,000. Washington State received. S66,550 for its first year<br />
was<br />
operation, and $72,769 the second year, a total of $139,319 for<br />
of<br />
two years. The nationwide effort began in 1965, and in Washington<br />
the<br />
the planning project began May 23, 1967.<br />
State<br />
law and federal regulations specified that planning<br />
The<br />
be directed toward the orderly developmentof vocational<br />
should<br />
within each state, including services provided by<br />
rehabilitation<br />
nonprofit agencies, with an overall objective ineach state<br />
private,<br />
making vocational rehabilitation services available, by July i,<br />
of<br />
to all physically handicapped individuals needing services.<br />
1975,<br />
was made for grants to be given either to the<br />
Provision<br />
vocational rehabilitation agency or to a planning agency<br />
state<br />
by the Governor for this specific purpose. In the State<br />
established<br />
Washington @overnor Daniel J. Evans decided that the study would<br />
of<br />
developed by a commission which he appointed. With approval of<br />
be<br />
grant application by the federal agency and the release of funds,<br />
the<br />
Washington State got under way.<br />
Scope<br />
as<br />
follows:<br />
The scope of the study was outlined in the grant application<br />
statewide planning study shall include: (i) estimates<br />
The<br />
present and projected needs of the handicapped through<br />
of<br />
(2) assessments of the adequacy of present programs<br />
1975;<br />
resources in terms of present and projected needs;<br />
and<br />
(3) recommendations for the development of adequate<br />
and<br />
rehabilitation resources and programs vocational Within<br />
the state.<br />
goals of the Division in-terms of kind and quality<br />
Current<br />
services, as well as quantity, shall be studied and<br />
of
Obec tives<br />
made. The current rehabilitants of the<br />
recommendations<br />
will be evaluated to determine the need for any<br />
Division<br />
in present services. Attention will be given<br />
revisions<br />
planning for services to categories of disabled persons<br />
to<br />
which appear not to have been adequately served.<br />
adequacy of existing vocational rehabilitation facili-<br />
The<br />
will be determined. Considermtion will be given to<br />
ties<br />
services, vocational rehabilitation centers, psy-<br />
medical<br />
and psychiatric services, etc. which may be<br />
chological<br />
for the rehabilitation of the handicapped. Full<br />
required<br />
will be given to other studies being made,<br />
consideration<br />
those relating to sheltered workshops and facil-<br />
especially<br />
The study shall also concern itself with the ade-<br />
ities..<br />
of training opportunities and the availability of<br />
quacy<br />
personnel, with the adequacy of salaries for pro-<br />
trained<br />
staff, and other items felt to be important to<br />
fessional<br />
the needs of the handicapped.<br />
meeting<br />
project shall also study the size of various disability<br />
The<br />
their rates of growth, and services and re-<br />
populations,<br />
available to them. Disability categories to be<br />
sources<br />
will include, but not be limited to: blind, deaf,<br />
studied<br />
mentally ill, mentally retarded, older<br />
heart-cancer-stroke,<br />
public offenders, economically and culturally<br />
citizens,<br />
the military rejectee, the disabled of low<br />
disadvantaged,<br />
welfare recipient, rural disabled and urban dis-<br />
income,<br />
abled, and disabled youth.<br />
objectives of the study are also quoted in full from<br />
The<br />
grant application:<br />
the<br />
To identify by number and category through sample studies<br />
i.<br />
the handicapped population and by the use of current<br />
of<br />
past studies and reports those disabled within the<br />
and<br />
who are in need of vocational rehabilitation<br />
state<br />
services.<br />
To prepare a written plan which will identify, analyze<br />
2.<br />
evaluate program goals, and to present a planned<br />
and<br />
indicating staff and financial support needed<br />
program<br />
achieve a program which will provide full geographic<br />
to<br />
and include all programs offering vocational<br />
coverage<br />
services. Included will be planning for<br />
rehabilitation<br />
special facilities and workshops for the handicapped.
To determine the need for and utilization of special<br />
3.<br />
for the handicapped.<br />
facilities<br />
To identify the barriers that prevent or delay needed<br />
4.<br />
rehabilitation services for the handicapped.<br />
vocational<br />
To identify vocational rehabilitation resources required<br />
5.<br />
meet future needs, including necessary legislative<br />
to<br />
community support, costs and steps required to<br />
action,<br />
the achievement of statewide goals among the<br />
facilitate<br />
and voluntary programs at state and local<br />
governmental<br />
These will be expressed in both interim-and<br />
levels.<br />
long-term goals.<br />
To determine the ways in which governmental and voluntary<br />
6.<br />
may be coordinated and, if necessary, reorganized<br />
programs<br />
develop services to meet demonstrated needs more<br />
to<br />
effectively.<br />
State was one of the last of the states to apply<br />
Washington<br />
the grant. It was specified at first that the grant period would<br />
for<br />
March i, 1967. However, the Project Director was not selected<br />
begin<br />
much later. He began employment on June 20, 1967. As some of<br />
until<br />
costs of the Planning Commission had been spent on May 23, 1967,<br />
the<br />
became the formal date of beginning of the planning project.<br />
this<br />
After a year the grant was renewed for the second and final year.<br />
difficulty with the planning project as outlined is<br />
The<br />
inevitably it concentrates on one state. There is very little<br />
that<br />
from other states. This method of operation seems to insure<br />
input<br />
there will be 50 separate .plans for the 50 separate states, just<br />
that<br />
the present vocational rehabilitation programs in the 50 states<br />
as<br />
separate. There is a remarkable diversity of rehabilitation<br />
are<br />
in the 50 states. The planning projects help perpetuate this<br />
programs<br />
diversity.<br />
a number or regions of the United States, however, the<br />
In<br />
directors of the comprehensive statewide planning programs<br />
project<br />
brought together quarterly by the appropriate federal officials.<br />
were<br />
helped insure some regional direction. In the Federal Rehabili-<br />
This<br />
Services Administration Region IX, with headquarters in San<br />
tation<br />
no meetings of this kind wereheld. The Regional Assistant<br />
Francisco,<br />
Commissioner for Rehabilitation Services did not call such a meeting.<br />
grant application specified that there would be a coopera-<br />
The<br />
agreement between the States of Oregon and Washington for state-<br />
tive<br />
planning to meet the needs of the handicapped in the two states.<br />
wide<br />
of the use of established and proposed rehabilitation facili-<br />
Because<br />
ties, educational institutions, and private agencies which are not
dictated by geographical boundaries, and because the activities<br />
always<br />
the people and business flow across state boundaries, it was deemed<br />
of<br />
to disabled persons to have the bi-state agreement. Although<br />
important<br />
cooperative agreement was never signed by the appropriate officials<br />
the<br />
twoproject directors, Dan W. Schausten of Oregon and David C.<br />
the<br />
of Washington, advised each other of the program plans, methods<br />
Carson<br />
obtaining report materials, previous studies reviewed and analyzed,<br />
of<br />
proposed methods of implementation of program findings. The<br />
and<br />
of the two planning projects participated in public and private<br />
staffs<br />
in the two states. The Commission is particularly grateful<br />
meetings<br />
to Mr. Schausten and his staff for their fine cooperation.<br />
planning project was hampered by the difficulties<br />
The<br />
both in 1967 and 1968 by the Rehabilitation Services<br />
experienced<br />
and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation in the<br />
Administration<br />
of Washington. Federal budget reductions dealt catastrophic<br />
State<br />
to these two agencies, forcing them to concentrate on immediate<br />
blows<br />
rather than long-range planning. The mood of the agencies<br />
salvation<br />
depressed. Smooth functioning became jerky. Staff members forced<br />
was<br />
deny services to the handicapped were distressed. Vocational<br />
to<br />
in Washington State at least, has been shaken by the<br />
Rehabilitation,<br />
of fiscal year 1969. These wounds will be long in healing.<br />
events<br />
therapy from the Rehabilitation Services Administration was<br />
Possible.<br />
forthcoming.<br />
not<br />
In Addition<br />
Commission members, have been unusually conscientious<br />
The<br />
attendance at meetings and participation in other activities<br />
about<br />
the Planning Commission. They have worked to enact legislation<br />
of<br />
by the Commission. They hae been individually and<br />
recommended<br />
supportive of the staff. They have made fact-finding<br />
collectively<br />
to notable rehabilitation facilities within and without the<br />
trips<br />
They have chaired.regional committees and participated on<br />
state.<br />
forces. The staff was able to be together almost throughout<br />
task<br />
entire period. This continuity, both of secretarial and pro-<br />
the<br />
members, contributed substantially to the smooth function-<br />
fessional<br />
of the office. Temporary staff members were brought in to help<br />
ing<br />
peak periods.<br />
at<br />
this time the assistance of psychologists was solicited<br />
At<br />
the staff of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
by<br />
symposium was held at the American Psychological Associationmeet-<br />
A<br />
in San Francisco, California, on..September2,..1968... The..appro-<br />
ing<br />
title, of.this..symposium was THE PROMISE AND REALITY OF RER-<br />
priate<br />
AGENCY PLANNING. As this symposium was authorized by the<br />
ILITATION<br />
Commission, and because, the papers contain information<br />
Planning<br />
to the planning project, these papers are reprinted in full<br />
.relevant<br />
as<br />
follows:
Promise and Reality of<br />
The<br />
Agency Planning<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
for Psychological<br />
Planning<br />
Needs in Rehabilitation<br />
Service<br />
Centers<br />
Relationship Between<br />
Potential<br />
and Local Psychological<br />
State<br />
and Vocational<br />
Associations<br />
Statewide<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Planning<br />
Aspects of Research in<br />
Relevant<br />
Selection and<br />
Personnel<br />
Training<br />
Services and<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Action Programs<br />
Community<br />
SYMPOS IUM<br />
THE PROMISE AND REALITY OF REHABILITATION AGENCY PLANNING<br />
David C. Carson<br />
Chairman-<br />
Director<br />
Project<br />
Commission for Vocational<br />
Planning<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Olympia, Washington<br />
Kenneth Barnes<br />
R.<br />
Services Administration<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
and Rehabilitation Service<br />
Social<br />
of Health, Education,<br />
Department<br />
Welfare<br />
and<br />
D. C.<br />
Washington,<br />
G. DiMichael, Director<br />
Salvatore<br />
for the Crippled and<br />
Institute<br />
Disabled<br />
York City, N. Y.<br />
New<br />
G. Shapiro<br />
Jeffrey<br />
Health Services for the Deaf<br />
Mental<br />
Porter Neuropsychiatric<br />
Langley<br />
Institute<br />
San Francisco, California<br />
A. Renzaglia, Coordinator<br />
Guy<br />
Counseling<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Illinois University<br />
Southern<br />
Illinois<br />
Carbondale,<br />
symposium was presented at the 76th Annual Convention of the<br />
This<br />
Psychological Association on September 2, 1968 at the Mark<br />
American<br />
Hotel in San Francisco. It was co-sponsored by the Division<br />
Hopkins<br />
Psychological Aspects of Disability and the Division of Psychologists<br />
on<br />
in Public Service.
THE PROMISE AND REALITY OF REHABILITATION AGENCY PLANNING<br />
by<br />
C. Carson, Project Director<br />
David<br />
Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Planning<br />
Washington<br />
Olympia,<br />
rehabilitation, like many other services programs<br />
Vocational<br />
the United States Government, has expanded haphazardly. Although<br />
of<br />
than fifty years old, it has come to serve rather well the needs<br />
less<br />
one segment of the vocationally handicapped--the young, well-<br />
of<br />
orthopedic patient. Spotty success with the mentally ill,<br />
motivated<br />
retarded, and public offenders has been noted in some<br />
intellectually<br />
in the past decade. Rehabilitation techniques have not been<br />
states<br />
used on those most needy, i.e., the socially disadvantaged,<br />
widely<br />
the rural poor.<br />
most of the money for vocational rehabilitation<br />
Although<br />
from the Federal government, a large measure of state control<br />
comes<br />
exists, with varied levels of efficiency.<br />
training and standards for staff members have<br />
Professional<br />
slow in coming. Research has been a seldom-used tool. Depen-<br />
been<br />
for the handicapped has been induced or continued by lack of<br />
dency<br />
services.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
the 1965 Amendments to the Federal law, grants were<br />
In<br />
to the states for planning for rehabilitation programs so that<br />
made<br />
1975 all persons eligible for services would have them available.<br />
by<br />
to $i00,000 per year per state for two years was offered. Little<br />
Up<br />
control was imposed. Planning grants, although 100% Federal<br />
Federal<br />
were not even requested by some states. Some state agencies<br />
money,<br />
have been wary of the scrutiny they do permit.<br />
symposium members will discuss the benefits obtained<br />
The<br />
the rehabilitation planning projects, with emphasis on personnel<br />
from<br />
and the use of psychologists in rehabilitation programs,<br />
selection;<br />
rehabilitation centers, and community action programs.<br />
comprehensive<br />
rehabilitation receives $500,000,000 in Federal<br />
Vocational<br />
annually now. State and other matching funds are also provided<br />
funds<br />
rehabilitate handicapped adults. Those served include the physi-<br />
to<br />
disabled, the intellectually retarded, the mentally ill, the<br />
cally<br />
offenders, and the socially disadvantaged. There has been a<br />
public<br />
of agencies, both governmental and private, which serve<br />
proliferation<br />
the handicapped.
more persons of working age become disabled each<br />
However,<br />
than become rehabilitated. Nearly four million disabled people<br />
year<br />
in the backlog needing vocational rehabilitation services. The<br />
are<br />
in 1965 appropriated money to pay "...the cost of planning<br />
Congress<br />
the development of a comprehensive vocational rehabilitation<br />
for<br />
in each State, including the orderly development of services<br />
program<br />
resources (public and nonprofit private) so that by July I, 1975,<br />
and<br />
sooner, vocational rehabilitation services will be available to<br />
or<br />
handicapped individuals in the state. This planning shall include,<br />
all<br />
other things, estimates of present and projected vocational<br />
among<br />
needs through 1975; assessment of the adequacy of present<br />
rehabilitation<br />
and resources in terms of present and projected needs; and<br />
programs<br />
and description of the specific steps necessary for the<br />
delineation<br />
of adequate vocational rehabilitation resources and<br />
development<br />
programs within the state."<br />
planning has been partly successful in that in some<br />
This<br />
the rehabilitation agency has obtained realistic goals and<br />
states<br />
the best ever public support through planning.<br />
the past, part of the vocational rehabilitation program<br />
In<br />
have been characterized by this couplet of Alexander Pope:<br />
could<br />
Much was Believ?.d, but little understood,<br />
And to be dull was construed to be o_.<br />
four other participants in this symposium are each<br />
The<br />
leaders helping rehabilitation, an adolescent, become<br />
distinguished<br />
transformed. We are attempting to respond to this wisdom:<br />
without action is futile;<br />
Planning<br />
without planning is fatal.<br />
Action
FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICE NEEDS<br />
PLANNING<br />
REHABILITATION FACILITIES<br />
IN<br />
by<br />
Kenneth Barnes, Ed.D., Chief<br />
R.<br />
of Rehabilitation Facilities<br />
Division<br />
of Health, Education, and Welfare<br />
Department<br />
Washington, D. C.<br />
facilities in the United States are experi-<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
a number of changes which necessitate our planning for new<br />
encing<br />
of rehabilitation services, and for improved techniques of<br />
patterns<br />
rehabilitation services to the handicapped and disadvantaged.<br />
providing<br />
are 1105 rehabilitation workshops and 185 rehabilita-<br />
There<br />
centers--as well as countless rehabilitation clinics, halfway<br />
tion<br />
and one-stop multiservice centers--known to the U.S. Rehabili-<br />
houses,<br />
Services Administration's Division of Rehabilitation Facilities.<br />
tation<br />
facilities typically offer their client populations a variety of<br />
These<br />
services including evaluation, psychological counseling, per-<br />
formal<br />
adjustment training, medical management, and vocational training.<br />
sonal<br />
(1959) denotes that within this framework, there are several<br />
DiMichael<br />
for providing psychological services to clients. Potentially<br />
avenues<br />
services may be rendered by counselors, psychometrists, staff<br />
the<br />
and outside psychologists, each operating at his level<br />
psychologists,<br />
competence, and with clients whom he is qualified to serve by<br />
of<br />
training and experience.<br />
its very nature, the rehabilitation facility furnishes<br />
By<br />
setting, through a team approach, focusing on the changing needs<br />
the<br />
the disabled person, to accomplish what the counselor and the<br />
of<br />
agency cannot do as well on an individual basis.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
Presenting this paper, three points are made. First, the<br />
In<br />
facility is more than just another service that can be<br />
rehabilitation<br />
It offers, through a variety of psychological evaluations,<br />
purchased.<br />
evaluations, work sample testings, job-try-outs, and its<br />
vocational<br />
therapeutic milieu, a process the dominant value of which<br />
unique<br />
is the non-verbal aspect of work.<br />
largely<br />
as discussed in The Report of the National Citizens<br />
Secondly,<br />
Committee on Vocational Rehabilitation (1968), rehabilitation<br />
Advisory<br />
confronted by a new kind of specialized problem; namely, the tremen-<br />
is<br />
number of men, women, and children--in addition to the "frankly"<br />
dous<br />
and mentally disabled--whose handicaps are primarily social,<br />
physically<br />
educational, and economic. To cope with the problems and<br />
cultural,
of these disadvantaged is to visualize "need groupings" that<br />
needs<br />
and to implement progress to meet these particular types of<br />
exist<br />
need.<br />
thirdly, the rhetoric of the psychologist abounds in<br />
And,<br />
manipulation and verbal interpretations. Admitting and accept-<br />
verbal<br />
the success of the psychological model for upper and middle class<br />
ing<br />
it is submitted that we cannot solve the awesome problems of<br />
America,<br />
disabled and most disadvantaged unless we apply the more non-<br />
many<br />
work model or environmental manipulation model, not reluctantly,<br />
verbal<br />
enthusiastically, throughout the rehabilitation processes offered<br />
but<br />
facilities.<br />
in<br />
the above points in mind, the position stated here is<br />
With<br />
psychological services in rehabilitation facilities must be<br />
that<br />
to the total needs of the handicapped or disadvantaged client.<br />
oriented<br />
since the fully functioning, competent person in our modern<br />
Further,<br />
society is expected to be gainfully occupied, work itself<br />
industrial<br />
a special role to play in evaluating and supporting one's progress<br />
has<br />
toward being the "complete being."<br />
agencies will continue to serve the physically<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
target group of the 1940's and both the physically and<br />
handicapped<br />
handicapped of the 1950's. Beyond these diagnostically recog-<br />
mentally<br />
groups, however, the American public of the late 1960's is<br />
nizable<br />
that vocational rehabilitation make contributions to the<br />
demanding<br />
of the nation by serving the variety of groups identified by<br />
welfare<br />
or more sociological characteristics lately labeled the "culturally<br />
one<br />
The culturally disadvantaged is defined in Section 15<br />
disadvantaged."<br />
the 1968 Vocational Rehabilitation amendments as (a) handicapped<br />
of<br />
as defined in section Ii (b) of this Act, frankly physically<br />
individuals<br />
mentally disabled; individuals disadvantaged by reason of their<br />
and<br />
or advanced age, low educational attainments, ethnic or cultural<br />
youth<br />
prison or delinquency records, or other conditions which con-<br />
factors,<br />
a barrier to employment; and (c) other members of their families<br />
stitute<br />
the provision of vocational rehabilitation services to family<br />
when<br />
is necessary for the rehabilitation of an individual described<br />
members<br />
clause (a) or (b)." Therefore, in serving this vast group it is<br />
in<br />
to be aware that it now becomes incumbent on rehabilitation<br />
important<br />
and facilities to mount a program to serve the needs of not<br />
agencies<br />
the disabled who represent their primary mission, but also many<br />
only<br />
of disadvantaged who may need the services, setting and<br />
thousands<br />
upon self-help characteristic of the rehabilitation model,<br />
emphasis<br />
to assist them in their quest for personal dignity and well-being.<br />
pervasive problem that perplexed rehabilitation personnel<br />
A<br />
the last score of years was the matter of eligibility for service.<br />
in<br />
upon a time, the same rehabilitation counselor who would have<br />
Once<br />
eligible for service a John Kennedy for his "bad back," also<br />
declared<br />
most likely would have rejected an Oswald for "no diagnostically
disability." These unimaginative administrative and<br />
identifiable<br />
legal, interpretations were resolved by the 1965 and 1967<br />
perhaps<br />
Rehabilitation Act amendments which clarified the concept<br />
Vocational<br />
disability to emphasize the behavioral disorders and the disadvan-<br />
of<br />
taged.<br />
now to the "nuts and bolts" of the kinds of psychological<br />
And<br />
envisioned as meeting the needs of clients to be served in<br />
services<br />
rehabilitation facilities.<br />
evaluation based on professional understanding<br />
Psychological<br />
standardized testing in the assessment and prediction of individual<br />
of<br />
of aptitudes, abilities, and interests may well represent the<br />
patterns<br />
for the evaluation process. Such evaluation can and should<br />
backbone<br />
an integral part of the rehabilitation process for most rehabili-<br />
be<br />
clients. Psychometric testing is accomplished by both the<br />
tation<br />
and the rehabilitation counselor--each at his level of<br />
psychologist<br />
As discussed by Wright and Cull (1968), rehabilitation<br />
competence.<br />
are expected to function generally in the provision of<br />
counselors<br />
evaluation at Level B (as identified by the A.P.A.<br />
psychological<br />
of Representatives). It is important that the rehabilitation<br />
Council<br />
be well-grounded in psychology, since evaluation in rehabili-<br />
counselor<br />
is the basis for rehabilitation diagnosis and for vocational<br />
tation<br />
If not qualified to test the rehabilitation counselor<br />
planning.<br />
secure these services from a qualified psychologist--for it is<br />
should<br />
rehabilitation counselor's responsibility to see that all clients<br />
the<br />
those necessary services which will insure satisfactory voca-<br />
receive<br />
social, and economic adjustment.<br />
tional,<br />
the past several years we have seen the introduction and<br />
In<br />
use of another evaluation technique known as "vocational<br />
expanded<br />
Gregman (1968) commented that the field of rehabilitation<br />
evaluation."<br />
hailed this process as a panacea in overcoming the limitations of<br />
has<br />
psychological tests. On the other hand, psychologists<br />
standardized<br />
questioned its use because reliability and validity in the<br />
have<br />
and use of most work samples have not been proved. The<br />
construction<br />
has the attraction of face validity, of course. Three<br />
technique<br />
bases to vocational evaluation, job try-out, work sample<br />
historical<br />
and therapeutic milieu are an integral part of the process<br />
testing,<br />
being used today.<br />
Evaluation via simulated tasks also appears a<br />
Vocational<br />
tool to test the non-verbal client, the illiterate, the<br />
suitable<br />
damaged, and others for whom the limitations of many standard-<br />
brain<br />
psychological tests are obvious. In his paper on ized "Simulated<br />
Walker (1968) states that in using simulated tasks, a more or<br />
Tasks,"<br />
direct measure of learning ability is obtained by replicating<br />
less<br />
job or learning situation to which the client will have to go<br />
that<br />
leaving the rehabilitation facility.<br />
upon<br />
i0
technology of client evaluation, that of "work<br />
Another<br />
is built upon the findings of the vocational evaluation<br />
adjustment"<br />
the general principles of human behavior and its capability for<br />
and<br />
A good work adjustment program is designed to enhance those<br />
change.<br />
which relate to real life work criteria and which are identi-<br />
aspects<br />
by the vocational evaluation process as being correctable<br />
fied<br />
deficiency in the client's behavior affecting his employability.<br />
and Cohen (1966) report that over half of the<br />
Speiser<br />
facilities in the United States have vocational evalua-<br />
rehabilitation<br />
or work adjustment programs, the majority of them having been<br />
tion<br />
in the past two years. At this early stage in the develop-<br />
established<br />
of the relatively new vocational evaluation and work adjustment<br />
ment<br />
it is recognized that there is no clear-cut understanding<br />
technique,<br />
the precise results that can be expected fr6m them and how they<br />
of<br />
fit into the over-all pattern of rehabilitation facility services.<br />
will<br />
can be said, however, that they are non-verbal psychological tools<br />
It<br />
like the three-legged stool, may stand as equal partners in the<br />
which,<br />
development and assessment of evaluation services.<br />
summary, the ways of the past are no longer adequate to<br />
In<br />
needs of the present. In modern rehabilitation center planning,<br />
the<br />
no longer need, nor can we afford the luxury of fragmented or<br />
we<br />
tightly structured services. Rather, the Center must be<br />
traditional,<br />
in character, creative and flexible in outlook,<br />
multi-dimensional<br />
and highly oriented along functional lines. Only in this<br />
adaptable,<br />
can we reach the new and growing disabled and disadvantaged popula-<br />
way<br />
it is our challenge as well as our opportunity.<br />
tions;<br />
ii
Bregman, Morton,<br />
References<br />
"Vocational Evaluation; Use and Misuse,<br />
Evaluation and Work .Adjustment Bulletin,<br />
Vocational<br />
Wisconsin: I, 2, p.6, Spring 1968<br />
Menomonie,<br />
Salvatore G., Pscholo$ical Services in Vocational<br />
DiMichael,<br />
Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing<br />
Rehabilitation,<br />
Office, 1959<br />
S., and Cohen, M., "The Current Status of Vocational<br />
Speiser,<br />
and Pre-Vocational Evaluation Training Programs in the<br />
Evaluation<br />
States," Report of Trainin$ Institutes on Factors of Work<br />
United<br />
p.5, May 1966<br />
Evaluation,<br />
S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National<br />
U.<br />
Advisory Committee on Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />
Citizens<br />
of the National Citizens Advisory Committee on Vocational<br />
Report<br />
Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office,<br />
Rehabilitation,<br />
p.5, June 1968<br />
Keith, and Cull, John, "Psychological Testing in the<br />
Wright,<br />
Setting," Richmond, Virginia: (Unpublished paper),<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
1968<br />
12
of Statewide Rehabilitation Planning<br />
Relationship<br />
Psychological Associations<br />
With<br />
G. DiMichael, Ph.D., Director<br />
Salvatore<br />
for the Crippled and Disabled<br />
Institute<br />
New York City, New York<br />
primary aim of statewide rehabilitation planning is to<br />
The<br />
about social action in behalf of handicapped people, some of<br />
bring<br />
are being helped and many more who should be served. The major<br />
whom<br />
of statewide planning meshes nicely with the objectives of state-<br />
aim<br />
associations of psychologists and indeed also with the bylaws of<br />
wide<br />
American Psychological Association. In formal organizational<br />
the<br />
of psychologists there is clear expression of intent to<br />
statements<br />
the personal and social life of individuals and groups. In<br />
improve<br />
area of rehabilitation, we find no political controversy but<br />
the<br />
a fairly unanimous conviction on the values of giving special<br />
rather<br />
to groups of handicapped people. In view of the close over-<br />
services<br />
of interests on the part of statewide rehabilitation planning<br />
lapping<br />
state psychological associations, we would hope that joint efforts<br />
and<br />
be made that will benefit everyone involved, especially the handi-<br />
will<br />
capped.<br />
some states a continuing relationship between the rehabili-<br />
In<br />
agency and the state psychological association already exists.<br />
tation<br />
is no denying that the relationship can be stepped up and in-<br />
There<br />
There will be many common areas of concern, a number of<br />
tensified.<br />
we will mention in this paper. Where the states do not have such<br />
which<br />
we would hope that they would be set up.<br />
relationships,<br />
would heartily hope that state psychological associations<br />
We<br />
both the ready inclination and vigor in taking the initiative for<br />
show<br />
on rehabilitation planning as an occasion for more pro-<br />
capitalizing<br />
common effort. As a parallel illustration, we could mention<br />
ductive<br />
in the area of organized medicine, a nationwide effort has been<br />
that,<br />
to encourage states to set up a committee on rehabilitation.<br />
made<br />
state organizations have formal support and continuing encourage-<br />
The<br />
from the American Medical Association. We would hope that the<br />
ment<br />
psychological associations would set up a special committee on<br />
state<br />
on several fronts.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
area, for example, could deal with the referral of<br />
One<br />
who come to the attention of psychologists. There is no<br />
clients<br />
that psychologists can look to the rehabili-tation agencies to<br />
doubt<br />
some special services, not otherwise available to the clients<br />
provide<br />
on September 2, 1968, at the annual meeting of the<br />
Delivered<br />
Psychological Association.<br />
American<br />
13
they serve. In addition, there is decided advantage in having<br />
which<br />
help of psychologists to identify handicapped clients and provide<br />
the<br />
with opportunities for rehabilitation and for more productive<br />
them<br />
to society.<br />
contributions<br />
another front, we would look for leadership by the state<br />
On<br />
associations in encouraging training courses for psychol-<br />
psychological<br />
in universities within the boundaries of the state. We know<br />
ogists<br />
well that there is a dearth of psychologists trained in working<br />
too<br />
the handicapped. We would hope that state psychological associ-<br />
with<br />
would bring to the attention of prospective psychology trainees<br />
ations<br />
importance and value of working with handicapped people. We would<br />
the<br />
hope that the universities would work together, at least on a<br />
also<br />
level, to conserve the training resources and to see that over-<br />
state<br />
and duplication is brought to a minimum.<br />
lapping<br />
another front, we would expect that professional consult-<br />
On<br />
assistance to the state rehabilitation agency would be provided<br />
ative<br />
the psychological association. There is a need for developing<br />
by<br />
standards and guides for inclusion of handicapped groups, such<br />
better<br />
the mentally retarded, the behaviorally disordered, the emotionally<br />
as<br />
and the minimally brain damaged to mention but a few groups.<br />
disturbed<br />
behaviorally disordered are mentioned in legislation but guides<br />
The<br />
the identification and eligibility of such groups are not ex-<br />
for<br />
described in functional terms for most rehabilitation agencies.<br />
plicitly<br />
more can be done in helping the rehabilitation agencies<br />
Considerably<br />
refine criteria and guides for evaluation, treatment, service and<br />
to<br />
follow-up.<br />
area for common effort is that of helping to support<br />
Another<br />
for substantially increased appropriations that could be used<br />
requests<br />
by state agencies in behalf of handicapped people. At<br />
advantageously<br />
present time, this is a crucial area in view of the intense com-<br />
the<br />
between agencies and due to the many demands being made on<br />
petition<br />
income. It is our belief that the state psychological associ-<br />
state<br />
have not sufficiently devoted themselves to this practical<br />
ations<br />
crucial area. In view of the lack of controversy about the values<br />
and<br />
rehabilitation, we would think that the state psychological associ-<br />
of<br />
would have no fear of stirring up a problem in the political<br />
ation<br />
Indeed, there is a wholesome bipartisan climate behind the<br />
arena.<br />
effort at the present time.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
would also expect that the psychological associations<br />
We<br />
be continuously concerned with efforts for improvement in<br />
would<br />
and quantity of rehabilitation services. This is no easy<br />
quality<br />
at the present time because of necessarily limited resources<br />
matter<br />
manpower and appropriations. We have to see that the services of<br />
in<br />
are brought to as many people as possible, with high<br />
psychologists<br />
However, the notion that considerable time spent with clients<br />
quality.<br />
indicative of high quality is an attitude that must be scrutinized<br />
is<br />
14
great care. On the financial side, we must see that professional<br />
with<br />
are established which are fair to both the rehabilitation agency<br />
fees<br />
and to psychologists.<br />
in the larger state agencies there should be a<br />
Certainly<br />
consultant on staff. This position is found with con-<br />
psychological<br />
infrequency, and perhaps this is a partial index of the fact<br />
siderable<br />
state psychological associations should be more intensively con-<br />
that<br />
cerned with the problems of handicapped people.<br />
brief, there are many ways, only some have been mentioned<br />
In<br />
this paper, in which state psychological associations can foster<br />
in<br />
and better professional help to the handicapped. The occasion<br />
more<br />
statewide rehabilitation planning could serve to spearhead a mount-<br />
of<br />
and visible effort to enhance the services of psychology and psy-<br />
ing<br />
in behalf of the handicapped. State psychological associ-<br />
chologists<br />
gain their strength from the services of individual psycholo-<br />
ations<br />
as leaders of their peers. We would hope that a number of psy-<br />
gists<br />
would now assume leadership and serve as catalysts for<br />
chologists<br />
about concerted and well directed efforts to enhance the<br />
bringing<br />
of the state and local psychological associations with those of<br />
aims<br />
objectives of statewide rehabilitation planning.<br />
the<br />
15
TRAINING, AND MANPOWER RECRUITMENT<br />
SELECTION,<br />
REHABILITATION i.<br />
IN<br />
G. Shapiro, Ph.D.<br />
Jeffrey<br />
Health Services For The Deaf<br />
Mental<br />
Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute<br />
The<br />
Francisco, California<br />
San<br />
is little need to document the growing demand for<br />
There<br />
services, and the lack of traditionally-trained man-<br />
rehabilitation<br />
to meet this demand. Further, the inability of training insti-<br />
power<br />
to meet the training needs is also generally accepted. This<br />
tutions<br />
has often been responded to by hiring nonprofessional person-<br />
dilemma<br />
This is usually seen as a method of temporarily filling the gap<br />
nel.<br />
until professionals can be recruited, trained, and employed.<br />
may in many cases be the workers of choice,<br />
Nonprofessionals<br />
if they can be selected carefully. This paper will discuss<br />
however,<br />
new ideas in regard to recruitment and training of personnel,<br />
some<br />
then detail a source from which new nonprofessional workers could<br />
and<br />
be found.<br />
from theory articulated by Carl Rogers (1951)<br />
Developing<br />
Charles Truax (1963), a concept of help-giving can be constructed<br />
and<br />
is in only a very limited respect dependent on professional<br />
which<br />
as preparation (Shapiro, 1967). The important variables in<br />
training<br />
are similar to personality variables: they are inter-<br />
help-giving<br />
characteristics which are habitually used by an individual,<br />
personal<br />
than learned behaviors which one puts on and takes off in the<br />
rather<br />
counseling situation.<br />
specific<br />
has suggested that genuineness, empathy, and warmth<br />
Research<br />
effective counseling traits in changing client behavior and person-<br />
are<br />
(Truax and Carkhuff, 1967). From this research has come a pro-<br />
ality<br />
which is not particularly complicated, and which verifies the<br />
posal<br />
previous beliefs of many professionals. Very simply, there is now<br />
The original version of this paper, presented at the American<br />
i.<br />
Association Convention September 2, 1968, in San<br />
Psychological<br />
California, was supported in part through National<br />
Francisco,<br />
of Mental Health Grant No. 12306-02 and by a Research<br />
Institute<br />
Training Center Division Grant (RT-13) from the Social and<br />
and<br />
Service, Department of Health, Education, and<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Washington, D.C. Manuscript preparation was aided<br />
Welfare,<br />
Social and Rehabilitation Service Grant RD-2835-S-68.<br />
through<br />
16
evidence that some counselors are more effective than others, and<br />
good<br />
have more positive impact on their clients than do others.<br />
regularly<br />
that the characteristics of these more helpful counselors are<br />
And,<br />
obvious personality traits which are effective in changing be-<br />
fairly<br />
havior in a variety of settings.<br />
implications of this belief have led us (and many others)<br />
The<br />
experimentation. If the personal qualities of genuineness, empathy,<br />
to<br />
warmth predict those more effective counselors, perhaps the other<br />
and<br />
traditionally thought to be necessary for counseling<br />
characteristics<br />
less important. Training in an academic institution has been<br />
are<br />
a necessary prerequisite to be a counselor in most pro-<br />
considered<br />
agencies. A bachelor's or perhaps even a Master's degree<br />
fessional<br />
required for consideration for a position. If one believes that<br />
was<br />
characteristics are the important variables in effective<br />
personality<br />
however, one might wonder if nonprofessionals who were in-<br />
counseling,<br />
herently therapeutic might not make effective counselors.<br />
concept was investigated at a residential rehabilitation<br />
This<br />
of over 300 beds in Hot Springs, Arkansas. The cliente is a<br />
center<br />
one, and the principal mission of the center is to provide the<br />
mixed<br />
who are called students, with the counseling and vocational<br />
clients,<br />
necessary to control their own lives after two to nine months<br />
training<br />
training. In a series of studies directed by Charles Truax, and<br />
of<br />
outstanding support of the training team in Hot Springs, some<br />
with<br />
conclusions were reached.<br />
interesting<br />
taken from the staff at the Rehabilitation<br />
Secretaries<br />
were found to be effective counselors. With day-to-day super-<br />
Center<br />
by regular staff members, they proved to be successful. The<br />
vision<br />
counselors were given a full case load, and were asked to<br />
untrained<br />
coordinate the case and deal on a day-to-day basis with problems<br />
both<br />
might come up. The secretaries who counseled the students were<br />
which<br />
by referral sources from around the state to have been just<br />
perceived<br />
useful to their students as trained counselors. Furthermore, there<br />
as<br />
no major differences between those counseled by trained and those<br />
were<br />
by untrained staff in regard to students' progress through<br />
counseled<br />
the Rehabilitation Center (Truax, 1967).<br />
study, and several others which could be quoted, have<br />
This<br />
in our minds a thorough re-examination of the nature of help-<br />
raised<br />
Theoretical work by Albee (1968) and Berenson and Carkhuff<br />
giving.<br />
have also influenced our thinking.<br />
(1967)<br />
general theory which makes this work relevant to hiring<br />
The<br />
in rehabilitation is that the skills which must be learned<br />
practices<br />
those who will be hired as nonprofessionals are less important<br />
by<br />
their over-all therapeutic and motivational thrust. Rehabili-<br />
than<br />
after whatever physical restorations are necessary, is in<br />
tation,<br />
part an interpersonal process. The rehabilitation client must<br />
large<br />
choose a career objective, must be trained for that career, must find<br />
17
job, and must stay on the job. All of these steps are undertaken<br />
a<br />
the presence of a counselor, trainer or employer, as well as other<br />
in<br />
who are undergoing the same process. The interpersonal variables<br />
peers<br />
are effective in counseling and psychotherapy can be effective<br />
which<br />
other roles as well. As one example, teachers in normal classrooms<br />
in<br />
are rated as more therapeutic are able to help theirstudents earn<br />
who<br />
grades and assimilate more knowledge than those teachers who<br />
better<br />
rated as less therapeutic (Aspy, 1965). The same findings hold<br />
are<br />
although to a less striking degree, in 200 rehabilitation clients<br />
ture,<br />
the Hot Springs Center (Truax and Carkhuff, 1967). That is, those<br />
at<br />
instructors offering higher levels of genuineness, empathy,<br />
vocational<br />
warmth elicited from their students more cooperation in the courses,<br />
and<br />
more dependable behavior, and a better quality of work.<br />
this point, it may be useful to discuss the question of<br />
At<br />
Again, most basically, the therapeutic potential of the<br />
training.<br />
is often more important than the content of the training. Up<br />
trainer<br />
now many agencies have used as trainers individuals who were senior<br />
to<br />
the organization, were tired of seeing clients on their own, were<br />
in<br />
facile, or were advanced in research techniques. None of<br />
verbally<br />
kinds of people are necessarily better trainers. We should begin<br />
these<br />
choose as trainers those individuals who have showed themselves com-<br />
to<br />
in helping clients. They may not necessarily be able to verbal-<br />
petent<br />
what they are doing, but they can serve as role models for those<br />
ize<br />
will be soon acting in the same position that they (the trainers)<br />
who<br />
did, as well as providing the same therapeutic thrust for the<br />
once<br />
staff that they did for their clients.<br />
as counselors differentially affect their clients,<br />
Just<br />
many instructors differentially affect students, so trainers<br />
and<br />
affect counselors or instructors-to-be. All of us<br />
differentially<br />
attended training sessions which have had impact on us and on<br />
have<br />
rest of the audience, which have opened up to us the possibility<br />
the<br />
we could be serving our clients in a more helpful fashion. And<br />
that<br />
have also sat through programs which have deadened us, made us<br />
we<br />
away, and which we have forgotten as soon as we got over the<br />
turn<br />
headache they elicited.<br />
both in academic institutions where they are<br />
Trainers,<br />
teachers or professors, and in training sessions in our own<br />
called<br />
have the same dual effects. Some make possible a positive<br />
agencies,<br />
in those who will serve clients, and some do not. It should<br />
change<br />
possible to pick out those rehabilitation workers who have been<br />
be<br />
moving their clients and let others watch them work. The<br />
really<br />
workers should be given a preliminary set to attend to the<br />
other<br />
instructor's style, rather than his subject matter. The same<br />
model<br />
be done for counselors and for others in the rehabilitation team<br />
can<br />
provide service and who are expected to change their clients.<br />
who<br />
direct interaction between trainers and staff should have<br />
Further,<br />
impact upon staff, helping them in turn to be more thera-<br />
therapeutic<br />
peutic with their clients.<br />
18
these trainers may not be the individuals who will<br />
Again,<br />
become administrators, or who enjoy attending meetings, or who<br />
ever<br />
been with the agency for long periods of time. They are simply<br />
have<br />
effective than others. They should be encouraged to take part<br />
more<br />
in training, either in discussion groups or through example.<br />
A New Source of Rehabilitation Personnel<br />
it has been argued that the differences between<br />
Thus,<br />
and ineffective helpers, and effective and ineffective<br />
effective<br />
are relatively unrelated to professionalization. These<br />
trainers,<br />
are unimportant, however, if rehabilitation agencies are<br />
matters<br />
able to choose between prospective employees. And, at the<br />
not<br />
time, this is the case. In many agencies, especially at the<br />
present<br />
levels of employment, almost anyone with the degree require-<br />
higher<br />
is a good candidate for a job. Many agencies are not in the<br />
ments<br />
of trying to choose between a number of highly qualified<br />
difficulty<br />
Instead, they are busy recruiting, near and far, to try<br />
applicants.<br />
find someone who ht be interested in working for them. For<br />
to<br />
reason, much of the above is beside the point. Agencies are not<br />
this<br />
the position of choosing the most helpful, for the most part, but<br />
in<br />
finding someone.<br />
in<br />
discussing new personnel, we in rehabilitation must<br />
Before<br />
that our services are considered far less important than<br />
understand<br />
work of many other segments of American society. We must also<br />
the<br />
to understand why certain forces in our society are perfectly<br />
learn<br />
happy to keep us relatively unimportant.<br />
the present time there is a widespread lack of accep-<br />
At<br />
of the spending of tax dollars for welfare programs in this<br />
tance<br />
The ease with which the United States Congress passed the<br />
country.<br />
items for the military as compared with the difficulty<br />
big-budget<br />
which War on Poverty money is appropriated is an example of the<br />
with<br />
of those who are elected. We begin with only a small per-<br />
commitment<br />
of the funds to be appropriated, and we are cut still further<br />
centage<br />
there is trimming to be done. On the other hand, past, present,<br />
when<br />
future wars account for well over 50% of the national budget, and<br />
and<br />
expanded rapidly and with little controversy whenever the pro-<br />
are<br />
fessionals in command, the army, request such growth.<br />
correlate of the power of the military is our country's<br />
A<br />
to a period of military training for young men. This is<br />
commitment<br />
as a way for a boy to become a man, to stabilize hisself-concept<br />
seen<br />
his interests, and to develop a way of life which will be useful<br />
and<br />
him in the future. Older teen-agers who get into trouble with the<br />
to<br />
are often given a choice between a term in prison or joining one<br />
law<br />
the armed forces. Students in college who are unsure of their goals<br />
of<br />
who are earning failing grades, are often encouraged to "grow up"<br />
or<br />
taking a two-year hitch in the military. This belief in the military<br />
by<br />
a positive training experience goes beyond any expectation that the<br />
as<br />
19
man is "serving his country"; serve he may, but he is also<br />
military<br />
to be well served by the military. It is also not vitiated<br />
thought<br />
the strong anti-military, anti-draft stands of a sizable minority<br />
by<br />
college students and a probable majority of college students in<br />
of<br />
more prestigious schools. Although some students otally reject<br />
the<br />
kind of regimentation and philosophy forced upon those who are<br />
the<br />
for the military, more are rejecting the current adventure in<br />
trained<br />
and accept the military as a reasonable problem-solving device,<br />
Vietnam,<br />
so also presumably accept its training as a generally reasonable<br />
and<br />
structure.<br />
than fifty years ago William James (1910) suggested<br />
More<br />
nations ought to adopt a moral equivalent to war. By this he<br />
that<br />
a draft army of young men who would spend several years in some<br />
meant<br />
occupation, one which required the positive qualities then<br />
service<br />
to the military. Essentially, James was arguing that every<br />
attributed<br />
chooses for itself an area of strong commitment, and that one<br />
society<br />
to overcome the emphasis on the destructive forces of warfare was<br />
way<br />
direct society's energies in another direction.<br />
to<br />
we redefine America's goals so that a period of time<br />
Can<br />
in rehabilitative work will be considered the kind of service<br />
spent<br />
young men and women might wish to give to their society? Can<br />
which<br />
learn to believe that a two-year Peace Corps experience, a one-year<br />
we<br />
experience, a one-year rehabilitation experience will accomplish<br />
VISTA<br />
same ends we currently expect from the armed forces? I do not<br />
the<br />
to suggest that we should draft men and women for reconstructive<br />
mean<br />
with individuals or groups who could use rehabilitative services,<br />
work<br />
that this work be both available and recommended to the youth of<br />
but<br />
country.<br />
this<br />
service has already been pioneered by the Federal<br />
Voluntary<br />
with the Peace Corps, VISTA, and other programs. These<br />
Government<br />
however, select only the most able, and so large numbers of<br />
groups,<br />
men and women who might make some contribution are selected out.<br />
young<br />
Job Corps has a different bias, and though administered as a train-<br />
The<br />
and service agency selects out the unpoor and the able.<br />
ing<br />
and Riessman (1965) and others have discussed the use<br />
Pearl<br />
large groups of nonprofessionals in providing human service to others.<br />
of<br />
they have concentrated upon the poor, their concepts can be<br />
Though<br />
to a full-scale program of Voluntary Service for Youth. Several<br />
adapted<br />
groups (Latter Day Saints and Friends, among others) have had<br />
religious<br />
experience administering similar programs.<br />
extensive<br />
fully-developed service will have a measurable impact on<br />
A<br />
in young America, on the quality and extent of social<br />
unemployment<br />
offered to all Americans (and, other nations as well), and in<br />
services<br />
value structure of Americans. Grandiose? Certainly! But possible.<br />
the<br />
20
such a program will require that funds at least<br />
Establishing<br />
to those now paid to army recruits be available for those<br />
equivalent<br />
want to develop themselves through building men and societies.<br />
who<br />
program will not be as selective as the Peace Corps and VISTA now<br />
This<br />
in regard to skills, nor as restrictive as the Job Corps in terms<br />
are<br />
poverty-level background. Just as almost any male can expect to<br />
of<br />
accepted if he volunteers for the armed forces, almost any male or<br />
be<br />
should expect to be accepted for a job in some area of voluntary<br />
female<br />
service.<br />
this choice should be recommended to individuals<br />
Further,<br />
are searching for a way of finding their bearings. The opportunity<br />
who<br />
take part in developing an individual or small group of persons,<br />
to<br />
in that way to effect the course of the whole society, is a very<br />
and<br />
one. For those who wish it, voluntary service can provide the<br />
special<br />
opportunities for travel as does the armed forces at the present<br />
same<br />
time, as well as training in a skill which will later be marketable.<br />
anyone who presently sees the army as a growth experi-<br />
For<br />
this plan of voluntary service should be at least acceptable.<br />
ence<br />
many who do not accept the armed forces this plan should be a<br />
For<br />
one. It will expose young men and women to the exhilarating<br />
welcome<br />
that they can help others. This will presumably have a<br />
possibility<br />
more positive long-lasting effect on their lives than forced time<br />
far<br />
the armed forces. It will also help advance the society in general,<br />
in<br />
providing manpower for services which today are not provided.<br />
in<br />
people who volunteer for such a program should have<br />
Young<br />
major say in the area of their work. Some will prefer physical<br />
a<br />
others teaching, others desk positions with service agencies.<br />
labor,<br />
however, will undoubtedly choose to be involved in direct con-<br />
Some,<br />
tact with underprivileged or client populations.<br />
is at this.point that we in rehabilitation should become<br />
It<br />
As noted earlier, some individuals with what are now<br />
interested.<br />
minimal amounts of training have been shown to be effective<br />
considered<br />
counseling, and in other social service occupations. The plan out-<br />
in<br />
above will provide the manpower needed to service the programs<br />
lined<br />
we and our clients believe are needed. It will give us enough<br />
that<br />
to work with that the selection procedures which have been<br />
individuals<br />
can be used, and clients will be receiving the best services<br />
developed<br />
available for the taxpayers' dollar (Savino and Schlamp, 1968).<br />
program should also provide rehabilitation services<br />
This<br />
a base from which to develop further recruitment and training.<br />
with<br />
will be able to encourage those who are most effective to stay<br />
We<br />
us in regular staff positions after their voluntary service<br />
with<br />
is over, or to go to Universities or other training institutions<br />
period<br />
more advanced preparation. The program is dependant upon a re-<br />
for<br />
of the society to training individuals for service, rather<br />
commitment<br />
destruction. If America chooses growth and development within<br />
than<br />
21
outside our nation, vast amounts of money now spent on armaments<br />
and<br />
be reconverted. The large numbers of young men who are not doing<br />
must<br />
which provides goods will become more visible. Many of those<br />
work<br />
in the army, and many of those unemployed, will be engaged<br />
formerly<br />
service-type employment. In some areas they will be building roads<br />
in<br />
schools, and in others, tearing down roads and schools to lay out<br />
and<br />
More interesting to us in rehabilitation services, they will<br />
parks.<br />
the front-line of manpower to service those who need help.<br />
provide<br />
our country will allow for a period of voluntary service the money<br />
If<br />
be found to buy the services. The money is available, just as it<br />
can<br />
available for Vietnam. The real question is whether the people<br />
was<br />
America want it strongly enough. And it is the job of those of<br />
of<br />
in planning for further rehabilitation services to show that the<br />
us<br />
are great enough to call forth the willingness.<br />
needs<br />
22
References<br />
Albee, G.W. Models, myths, and manpower. Mental Hygiene, 1968, 52,<br />
i.<br />
168-180.<br />
Aspy, D. A study of three facilitative conditions and their<br />
2.<br />
to the achievement of third grade students.<br />
relationships<br />
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1965.<br />
Berenson, B.G. and Carkhuff, R.R. (Eds.) Sources of gain in coun-<br />
3.<br />
$ an__d psychoth_erapy. New York: Holt, 1967.<br />
selin<br />
James, W. The moral equivalent of war. Popular Science Monthl X,<br />
4.<br />
7--7, 400-412.<br />
1910,<br />
Pearl, A. and Riessman, F. Ne__w Creers for th__e o: the nonpro-<br />
5.<br />
in human service. New York: Free Press, 1965.<br />
fessional<br />
Rogers, C.R. Client-centered therapy. Boston: Hougton-Mifflin,<br />
6.<br />
1951.<br />
Savino, M.T. and Schlamp, F.T. The use of nonprofessional rehabili-<br />
7.<br />
aides in decreasing re-hospitalization. Journal of reha-<br />
tation<br />
bilitation, 1968, 3--4, 28-31.<br />
Shapiro, J.G. Therapeutic conditions beyond the psychotherapy<br />
8.<br />
Arkansas Rehabilitation Research and Training<br />
encounter.<br />
Center Discussion Papers, Vol. I, No. 8, 1967.<br />
Truax, C.B. Effective ingredients in psychotherapy: An approach<br />
9.<br />
unraveling the patient-therapist interaction. Journal of<br />
to<br />
Counselin$ .Psychology, 1963, IO, 256-263.<br />
Truax, C.B. The use of supportive personnel in rehabilitation<br />
i0.<br />
Process and outcome. In G.R. Leslie (Edo),<br />
counseling:<br />
personnel i__nrehabilitation centers. Washington, D.C.:<br />
Supportive<br />
of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1967.<br />
Department<br />
Truax, C.B., and Carkhuff, R.R. Toward effective counselin$ an__d<br />
ii.<br />
Chicago: Aldine, 1967.<br />
psychotherapy.<br />
23
PLANNING FOR REHABILITATION AND COMMUNITY ACTION<br />
A. Renzaglia, Ph.D.<br />
Guy<br />
and Director, Rehabilitation Institute<br />
Professor<br />
Illinois University<br />
Southern<br />
Illinois<br />
Carbondale,<br />
eloquence of our previous speakers in presenting the<br />
The<br />
and extent of comprehensive planning for psychological services<br />
need<br />
rehabilitation centers and by professional associations leaves me<br />
in<br />
bit uncertain (even apprehensive) about the significance of my topic--<br />
a<br />
observations on rehabilitation psychology and community programs.<br />
some<br />
are being written on the need and significance of state and<br />
Volumes<br />
planning for health and welfare service; directives and memos<br />
national<br />
out glowingly the importance of comprehensive health facilities<br />
spell<br />
multi-service centers; and committees of all kinds are being<br />
and/or<br />
to represent communities, districts, regions, states, and so<br />
formed<br />
Chances are that what I have to say is in most part a reply of<br />
on.<br />
many utterances, borrowed from here and there, and perhaps even<br />
these<br />
to many of you. Yet, planning for comprehensive statewide<br />
boring<br />
is a reality and it behooves us as rehabilitation psycholo-<br />
services<br />
and counselors to consider seriously our role and possible<br />
gists<br />
in this movement.<br />
impact<br />
An Aroused Psychology<br />
trust you have noticed with me the emphasis at this APA<br />
I<br />
on social service and social responsibility. At every<br />
Convention<br />
I attended so far, speakers have chided APA members for fail-<br />
session<br />
to become significant forces in social planning and in action<br />
ing<br />
Leaflets have been circularized in many meeting places<br />
programs.<br />
the membership to attend an informal discussion group, whose<br />
urging<br />
mind you, is to make "psychology more socially relevant."<br />
objective,<br />
a far cry from the conventions of former years. Then the voices<br />
What<br />
the socially and community oriented psychologists were a small din<br />
of<br />
a larger roar and only a few rallied to the cause. Now there is<br />
in<br />
obvious sense of urgency, an optimism or belief that psychologists<br />
an<br />
have something concretely to offer, and, more so, that we have a<br />
do<br />
of moral responsibility to take action. No longer can we pretend<br />
kind<br />
psychologists have no stake in what occurs in life's arenas, nor<br />
that<br />
we hide behind the notion that social planning is outside the pale<br />
can<br />
psychology, and that rightfully such is the responsibility of poli-<br />
of<br />
jurists, religionists, moralists and the like. The force<br />
ticians,<br />
this movement has generated in the recent past and now is to me<br />
that<br />
most encouraging.<br />
24
course, rehabilitation psychologists and counselors<br />
Of<br />
take a measure of pride in this recent emphasis, since they<br />
should<br />
long advocated socially relevant activities on the part of their<br />
have<br />
For some time now they, with other community psychologists,<br />
members.<br />
argued for a conitment to and involvement in community, state,<br />
have<br />
national socio-economic problems. This some have done through<br />
and<br />
training programs (witness the increasing number of courses in<br />
their<br />
psychology, community resources, and community development<br />
community<br />
in such programs), involvement in social planning, and assistance<br />
now<br />
the development of community-based programs of all kinds. It is<br />
in<br />
obvious that psychologists (as our previous speakers have pointed<br />
now<br />
must be involved in planning of comprehensive community services<br />
out)<br />
all levels of organization and locale. Certainly we have a lot to<br />
at<br />
about the prevention, management and control of social and human<br />
say<br />
and it is equally clear that psychologists through their<br />
difficulties,<br />
and organizations can help train or provide the manpower for<br />
influence<br />
these burgeoning services.<br />
spport Personnel<br />
corollary and even more recent concern has been (and is)<br />
A<br />
matter of support personnel in the helping profession. Our next<br />
the<br />
Dr. J. G. Shapiro, will present some clear evidence that<br />
speaker,<br />
aides can be trained successfully as agents of change, and there<br />
these<br />
ways to identify those most likely to succeed. In any event, it<br />
are<br />
gratifying to note the many programs at this convention at which<br />
is<br />
are exhorting psychologists to become a part of this enter-<br />
speakers<br />
Some universities are responding to this demand for personnel<br />
prise.<br />
welfare and rehabilitation agencies, others are playing a more<br />
from<br />
game of "wait and see," while the more traditional are<br />
cautious<br />
in their refusal to venture in training for new careers.<br />
adamant<br />
(1968) recently advanced some cogent arguments for university<br />
Adams<br />
and commitment to training undergraduates for the help-<br />
participation<br />
services: "Undergraduate education in the helping services, if<br />
ing<br />
and broadly conceived and planned, can be the finest study<br />
properly<br />
the humanities." And he goes on to say that "such an education<br />
of<br />
not take away from the liberal arts curriculum but makes a sub-<br />
does<br />
addition." He sees such training as "exciting," "vital,"<br />
stantial<br />
and "innovating" a challenge to higher education<br />
"creative,"<br />
I share his enthusiasm.<br />
and<br />
here are some encouraging signs that there is an awaken-<br />
So<br />
a powerful urge to embroil psychology and its resources in the<br />
ing,<br />
of rehabilitation, welfare, corrections, and other social<br />
arenas<br />
It is now encumbent on us to reflect on the multifarious<br />
services.<br />
that psychologists can make an impact on social problems and<br />
ways<br />
make our voices heard in statewide planning units. The<br />
vigorously<br />
given to every state to develop a comprehensive plan of voca-<br />
charge<br />
rehabilitation, for instance, whereby all handicapped people<br />
tional<br />
be serviced by July of 1975, is both an awesome prospect and<br />
will<br />
It is in this respect that my remarks will be limited<br />
exciting.<br />
25
viable and powerful force behind (and integral to) compre-<br />
today--a<br />
rehabilitation in its mission to activate and service commun-<br />
hensive<br />
ities.<br />
Need for Planning and Action<br />
from the clear recognition by all responsible profes-<br />
Aside<br />
and agencies that the number of individuals who become handi-<br />
sionals<br />
yearly outstrip the number being rehabilitated, and the fact<br />
capped<br />
there is now quite a backlog of handicapped people needing rehab-<br />
that<br />
services, a number of other imminent factors dictate immed-<br />
ilitation<br />
planning (as it does the reshuffling of resources) if the dream<br />
iate<br />
rehabilitation (and comprehensive community services) is to become<br />
for<br />
reality. Some of these are:<br />
a<br />
an alarming proliferation of agencies now involved in<br />
i.<br />
vocational rehabilitation services to the<br />
providing<br />
handicapped;<br />
the inclusion of socially-culturally disadvantaged<br />
2.<br />
disenchanted) as appropriate clientele for<br />
(and<br />
vocational rehabilitation agencies;<br />
recent ammendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
3.<br />
which broadens the responsibilities of divisions<br />
Act<br />
of vocational rehabilitation; namely,<br />
assessment and evaluation of poverty groups<br />
a.<br />
service;<br />
for<br />
early identification of handicapped conditions<br />
b.<br />
more extensive service to the teenaged<br />
and<br />
and<br />
handicapped;<br />
the obvious trend toward providing services to<br />
c.<br />
of the handicapped and even to living<br />
families<br />
in which handicapping conditions prevail;<br />
units<br />
the corollary movement of planning statewide health and<br />
4.<br />
services in such departments as public health<br />
restoration<br />
and mental health.<br />
a member of the State Board of Vocational Education and<br />
As<br />
in Illinois, I have become acutely aware of the number<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
private and governmental agencies that are now engaged in providing<br />
of<br />
rehabilitation services to the handicapped, more so than<br />
vocational<br />
visible to many of us even where the action is. Excluding private<br />
is<br />
at least eight governmental agencies in Illinois provide<br />
agencies,<br />
to the handicapped, all of which were traditionally subsumed<br />
services<br />
DVR agencies, or at least these functions were assigned by execu-<br />
in<br />
order as their responsibility. An array of fragmented services<br />
tive<br />
being provided by such agencies as the Department of Labor, Public<br />
are<br />
Assistance, Public Instruction, Children and Family Services, Mental<br />
26
Office of Economic Opportunity Action Programs, Housing and<br />
llealth,<br />
Development, and now the Model Cities Programs. Some of these<br />
Urban<br />
are developing rather comprehensive services and acquiring<br />
agencies<br />
with the expertise to do so; others have only ventured into<br />
personnel<br />
areas of rehabilitation, but zealously and with powerful<br />
certain<br />
at their command. While this proliferation speaks positively<br />
resources<br />
the increased awareness of the need for and acceptance of the rehab-<br />
of<br />
process, coordination has been lacking and overlap and ill-<br />
ilitation<br />
responsibilities prevail. Many have lamented this topsy-<br />
defined<br />
development of rehabilitation in the states and voices have been<br />
turvy<br />
urging a more coordinated and concerted effort. Byproducts of<br />
raised<br />
fragmentation seem to be duplication of services, unclear bound-<br />
this<br />
of responsibilities, concentration in certain areas and neglect<br />
aries<br />
others, vying for clients, shunting of clients from one agency to<br />
of<br />
andeven inefficiency in operations. Obviously, the answer<br />
another,<br />
lie in augmenting nor perpetuating the present situation, and<br />
doesn't<br />
as a member of the rehabilitation team, should also<br />
psychologists,<br />
their voices to push for coordination of some sort.<br />
raise<br />
Some Positive Si$.ns<br />
the above commentaries on the frationated nature of<br />
While<br />
in most stages is rather pessimistic, I do want to<br />
rehabilitation<br />
also the many concerted movements now in force that may well<br />
recognize<br />
precursors to an over-all coordinated scheme.<br />
be<br />
The Rehabilitation Services Administration (previously<br />
i.<br />
Rehabilitation Administration) and their state<br />
Vocational<br />
have long advocated cooperative efforts<br />
counterparts<br />
state agencies. Witness the excellent work now<br />
between<br />
done in cooperative programs between the Division<br />
being<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation and public schools, correctional<br />
of<br />
and units, mental hospitals, community action<br />
facilities<br />
special schools, workshops and similar. Amazing<br />
programs,<br />
in rehabilitating hitherto difficult populations<br />
studies<br />
handicapped people have been reported.<br />
of<br />
The recent reorganization in the Department of Health,<br />
2.<br />
and Welfare leading to the creation of the<br />
Education<br />
and Rehabilitation Service also attests to the<br />
Social<br />
conclusion that more efficient and effective<br />
inescapable<br />
for the handicapped is likely to be achieved<br />
service<br />
coordination of social and rehabilitation services.<br />
through<br />
too numerous to mention and somewhat isolated attempts<br />
These<br />
cooperation between service agencies are visible signs of an even<br />
at<br />
movement--a concerted drive to comprehensive and coordinated<br />
greater<br />
for the handicapped citizen.<br />
services<br />
27
acceptance of many socially and cultural handicapped by<br />
The<br />
for service is certainly one of the most forward steps taken in<br />
DVRs<br />
war on poverty; yet it is a tremendouly ambitious obligation to<br />
the<br />
Apparently, vocational rehabilitation agencies were given<br />
assume.<br />
awesome task in recognition of the manner and effectiveness with<br />
this<br />
they dispatched their services to the physically,mentally, and<br />
which<br />
handicapped. And they have indeed demonstrated over the<br />
emotionally<br />
the soundness of their process for rehabilitating the handicapped;<br />
years<br />
also had a cadre of personnel to match. Since the mission before<br />
they<br />
is staggering, they need whatever support and leadership psycholo-<br />
them<br />
can give, but active participation is necessary. Immediately,<br />
gists<br />
agencies need help in defining the population to receive service, and<br />
VR<br />
extent of their services; in recruiting sufficient subprofessionals<br />
the<br />
man their units; a source of consultants, determining methods of<br />
to<br />
this population; establishment of community-based units,<br />
reaching<br />
approaches; and on sundry other issues. It saddens me,<br />
motivational<br />
one, to hear VR administrators wail, "How can we possibly serve<br />
for<br />
those people?"<br />
all<br />
added function of DVRs and a timely one, is that of<br />
Another<br />
and evaluating for service and referral the unemployed-<br />
processing<br />
populations. Once again VR agencies have been singled<br />
underemployed<br />
as th__e units most prepared and knowledgeable to take on this basic,<br />
out<br />
service. Let yourself conceive for a moment<br />
first-step-in-the-process<br />
implications and extensiveness of this charge, and I suspect you,<br />
the<br />
DVR personnel, will also cringe with the enormity of it. Need-<br />
like<br />
to say, DVRs need encouragement and help of all kinds, perhaps<br />
less<br />
in obtaining trained assessors and evaluators, and psychology must<br />
most<br />
to their needs. This is another sign of the times making it<br />
respond<br />
that departments of psychology and professional psychologists<br />
imperative<br />
aside their pretentious notions and arguments over the merits of<br />
put<br />
versus applied, professionals and/or subprofessionals,<br />
experimental<br />
then truly turn over their resources to training well-qualified<br />
and<br />
assessors and support personnel.<br />
the 1967 National Rehabilitation Association Conference,<br />
In<br />
then Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, John W. Gardner,<br />
the<br />
some of the promises for rehabilitation that were likely to<br />
described<br />
from the reorganization of the Department. Foremost among<br />
accrue<br />
welcome, yet seemingly beyond the scope of present resources,<br />
these<br />
the following possibilities:<br />
are<br />
i. Special services for children and youth;<br />
Provisions for the early identification of handicapping<br />
2.<br />
and<br />
conditions;<br />
3. More and better services for the teenage handicapped.<br />
28
he proposed that the rehabilitation community<br />
Further,<br />
more of its thinking to the family. He said,<br />
direct<br />
we were to improve the conditions in which a handi-<br />
If<br />
person lives, we should be addressing ourselves<br />
capped<br />
his entire family unit, and even to environmental<br />
to<br />
that extend beyond the family. Those of<br />
circumstances<br />
who have been working with juvenile delinquents<br />
you<br />
how important those circumstances can be. The<br />
know<br />
environment represents stability and inspiration<br />
home<br />
some, a place of conflict and frustration for<br />
for<br />
and for some, of course, home or family life<br />
others,<br />
non-existent.<br />
are<br />
this proposal, we can visualize different activities<br />
From<br />
the field or district worker. Somehow he must become less<br />
for<br />
Somehow he will come to give heavy attention to the<br />
office-bound.<br />
that sustain the disability and that mitigate against<br />
conditions<br />
change for the client. Another brief quote from<br />
effective<br />
Gardner's speech:<br />
Mr.<br />
our approach is family centered, and if it takes<br />
If<br />
account the environment in which rehabilitation<br />
into<br />
occur, we may be more successful in rehabili-<br />
must<br />
th handicapped person himself; we may help<br />
tating<br />
disorganized and distraught families into<br />
transform<br />
of strength and purpose; and we may succeed in<br />
units<br />
the foundation for a stronger and sounder<br />
building<br />
order.<br />
social<br />
here we have a global perspective of service for the<br />
So<br />
from prevention to fulfillment, and a promise of such<br />
handicapped,<br />
available to those virtually out of the cradle and before the<br />
being<br />
What more can the behavioral scientist and practitioner ask<br />
grave.<br />
For who among us has not speculated on what could be done in<br />
for?<br />
society with a comprehensive charge and plan of service, massive<br />
our<br />
in the social milieu, to head off deprivation, misery,<br />
intervention<br />
human waste. Urgently needed is an over-all approach for each<br />
and<br />
framed by social and behavioral scientists, community repre-<br />
state<br />
legislators, and the many other involved parties, as<br />
sentatives,<br />
well as the financial and personnel resources to launch it.<br />
Who's Plannin$<br />
planning for comprehensive health and welfare is<br />
Statewide<br />
a concern of other than the state vocational rehabilitation<br />
also<br />
In Illinois, for instance, the Department of Mental<br />
departments.<br />
supported by a planning grant, embarked on such a plan,<br />
Health<br />
prodded by the comprehensive Mental Health Centers Act<br />
undoubtedly<br />
1963 and its amendments. To complicate matters even further, the<br />
of<br />
Department of Public Health has recently been designated by<br />
Illinois<br />
Governor, at the request of the Department of Health, Education,<br />
the<br />
Welfare, as the agency responsible for over-all health planning<br />
and<br />
the state. Purportedly, the latter would subsume in its plan<br />
in<br />
29
more restricted plans of other health management and treatment<br />
the<br />
Mental Health, Vocational Rehabilitation, Children<br />
agencies--i.e.,<br />
Family Services, Division of Alcoholism Commission, Narcotics<br />
and<br />
Addictive Drugs, and similar agencies. All efforts are now in<br />
and<br />
initial stages (formulation of numerous committees, assessment<br />
the<br />
present status and services, and formulating a pla of attack),<br />
of<br />
one must pause to consider the many difficulties, complications<br />
but<br />
responsibilities thrust on the backs of these planners. Should<br />
and<br />
agency develop their own plan? It makes a good deal of sense.<br />
each<br />
will each be integrated into an over-all plan without slighting<br />
How<br />
or the other Who will be responsible for eventually coordinat-<br />
one<br />
such an all-embracing proposal? Will psychologists make them-<br />
ing<br />
heard? Quite clearly they have a tremendous stake in the final<br />
selves<br />
to the future of health management, treatment and<br />
product--guidelines<br />
enhancement.<br />
A Be$innin $<br />
have managed to touch only briefly on a number of crucial<br />
I<br />
that confront rehabilitation generally and of course psycholo-<br />
issues<br />
in rehabilitation, in particular, since they are directly<br />
gists<br />
So far I have pointed out that the issues of our times and<br />
involved.<br />
movements being launched by state and federal agencies make it<br />
the<br />
that rehabilitation psychologists and counselors take an<br />
imperative<br />
role in rehabilitation planning and action programs; that full<br />
active<br />
of psychology's potential and future course is now at<br />
realization<br />
stake; and that we are welcomed and needed as partners in planning.<br />
then is a partial solution, a first step, to resolve<br />
What<br />
lack of concerted effort or, positively, to weld the rehabilita-<br />
the<br />
movement into a comprehensive community force? In this respect,<br />
tion<br />
National Citizens Advisory Committee on Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
the<br />
has submitted a list of recommendations to the Secretary of<br />
(1968)<br />
Education, and Welfare that are quite far-reaching in scope,<br />
Health,<br />
as a group they certainly underscore (if not outrightly so, then<br />
and<br />
design) the need for careful planning and coordination of all<br />
by<br />
Like the Advisory Committee, I am deeply convinced and<br />
resources.<br />
on the merits of "decentralization and dispersal" of rehabilita-<br />
sold<br />
offices "in major population centers to provide services in<br />
tion<br />
wNere disabled people live." The practice of locating<br />
neighborhoods<br />
in downtown and plush areas of the community, estranged from<br />
offices<br />
target areas in which handicapping conditions are prevalent,<br />
the<br />
should be relegated to the past only.<br />
recommendations that particularly stood out for me and<br />
The<br />
to which I want to react are contained in the following quote:<br />
and<br />
by vocational rehabilitation agencies of<br />
Establishment<br />
multiservice centers in ghettos and other<br />
one-stop,<br />
areas where the incidence of disability is high."<br />
30
suspect this has become a deeply assimilated and etched dream of<br />
I<br />
which I cherish for rehabilitation, for as a member of the Youth<br />
mine<br />
Center Study Group some five years ago I became indelibly<br />
Opportunity<br />
with the notion and merits of comprehensive, neighborhood<br />
impressed<br />
It was clear then, as it is now, that total services had to<br />
centers.<br />
brought to the neighborhoods where the "action is," and that some<br />
be<br />
indigenous to these areas could be trained and employed to<br />
leaders<br />
man these centers.<br />
help<br />
Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center.s<br />
We Are Over the past five years, experiences with multi-<br />
Where<br />
centers such as Youth Opportunity Centers, Gateway Centers,<br />
purpose<br />
Centers, Concentrated Employment Centers, Comprehensive<br />
Neighborhood<br />
Health Centers and the like have contributed much to our under-<br />
Mental<br />
of the do's and don'ts of community-based services. In many<br />
standing<br />
these experiences have heightened the issues and controversies,<br />
ways<br />
even more to the confusion. There is still no agreement on how<br />
adding<br />
the centers should be nor how they should be organized,<br />
comprehensive<br />
and services dispensed. Should we push for what is a prevalent<br />
manned,<br />
valued concept today, the idea of "community-based service"? Some<br />
and<br />
to argue that the community must be permitted to take over<br />
continue<br />
operate such centers, particularly in ghetto areas, but who is to<br />
and<br />
organize, train and finance these community forces? Most, of<br />
arouse,<br />
cherish this dream of "a community activated and organized to<br />
course,<br />
its own problems" concept, rightfully assuming that such a<br />
handle<br />
would thereby be psychologically prepared and resourcefully<br />
community<br />
mobilized to prevent, treat and rehabilitate its human casualties.<br />
are less optimistic that communities will ever become<br />
Others<br />
involved, and they are accepting a modified plan of community parti-<br />
so<br />
The latter group shares the rationale for community involve-<br />
cipation.<br />
and participation but in cooperation with and under the leadership<br />
ment<br />
an established and on-going agency or agencies. Even when the<br />
of<br />
plan and organize their own services, they argue, the<br />
communities<br />
(clients) will soon perceive them in a manner similar to<br />
consumers<br />
services the establishment, or as an "agency umbrella."<br />
agency<br />
so they feel that community operated and sponsored services of<br />
More<br />
kind are subject more to petty jealousies and interest groups<br />
this<br />
are the"freer" state agencies. Too many have witnessed the<br />
than<br />
among factions in the community for power in these community<br />
struggle<br />
programs, and the unfortunate consequences; some have also been<br />
action<br />
over noting the ease with which the executive directors have<br />
soured<br />
these centers in their own limited images often at the<br />
perpetuated<br />
of the community.<br />
expense<br />
have experiences with state-federally (agency) sponsored<br />
Nor<br />
been too refreshing or innovating. The hopes and dreams of<br />
centers<br />
Opportunity Centers, as a comprehensive and innovating service<br />
Youth<br />
unemployed and under-employed youth, were never realized in many<br />
for<br />
communities. Admittedly, they did bring somewhat together an array<br />
31
specialized services for youth, but in the main they were fashioned<br />
of<br />
existing state employment services. Some attribute this to the<br />
after<br />
that the personnel and leadership manning these centers were<br />
fact<br />
primarily from existing emplo[ent centers, and because of<br />
recruited<br />
experience, they tended to fashion youth opportunity centers in<br />
their<br />
with these experiences. It must be recognized, of course,<br />
accordance<br />
was and is a shortage ¢ competent personnel, an it may well be<br />
there<br />
youth opportunity cente. ,ere prematurely opened. Perhaps it<br />
that<br />
have been sounder to dela the opening of such centers until a<br />
may<br />
of personnel were recruited and trained to implement the intent<br />
pool<br />
the movement. To add to that, if the cooperation of universities,<br />
of<br />
psychologists in particular, had been sought or volunteered to<br />
and<br />
prepare these personnel, perhaps the results would have been different.<br />
Illinois, the Department of Mental Health has taken the<br />
In<br />
in establishing community=based centers .hrough their zone<br />
leadership<br />
Some centers are raher comprehensive, embracing many<br />
programs.<br />
ordinarily the responsibility of oher agencies (such as<br />
services<br />
rehabilitation, employment services, etc.), and some are<br />
vocational<br />
limited. Many are at a disadvantage because they have not<br />
rather<br />
involved the community, and others have trouble getting<br />
adequately<br />
and service from other state agencies. Patients are still<br />
cooperation<br />
around from center to agency for services, but at least services<br />
shunted<br />
been brought to the community itself--not isolated from it. New<br />
have<br />
and many other states have done likewise. Missouri, on the other<br />
York<br />
has concentrated on community action programs (human development<br />
hand,<br />
gateway projects) and programs sponsored by the labor department<br />
and<br />
employment programs). Here in California a number of<br />
(concentrated<br />
rehabilitation or service centers have been formed, I<br />
comprehensive<br />
Some are still flourishing, while others have dissolved<br />
understand.<br />
for want of coordination and support.<br />
to me in all of these experiences with community<br />
Distressing<br />
centers was and is the obvious lack of interest and involvement<br />
service<br />
psychologists as a whole whether in universities or in the field.<br />
by<br />
all the behavioral scientists, the psychologists should be deeply<br />
Of<br />
and most willing to invest their resources in the future of<br />
supportive<br />
movement. Another disquieting feature of these efforts has been<br />
this<br />
extent to which vocational rehabilitation agencies are letting<br />
the<br />
be pre-empted by other agencies. VR agencies are seemingly<br />
themselves<br />
their responsibilities for services and by default, others<br />
abdicating<br />
taking over. In any event, it is quite clear even from this<br />
are<br />
and fragmented review that planning is essential to success,<br />
sketchy<br />
unless all are involved and soon, we may witness even more confu-<br />
and<br />
sion as time goes on.<br />
Considerations While I am still deeply committed to the<br />
Some<br />
of Community Rehabilitation Centers, in which multiple<br />
establishment<br />
(now provided in many areas by various agencies) be made<br />
services<br />
to clients as soon after initial contact as possible, I am<br />
available<br />
at all certain just how to proceed. Experiences as previously<br />
not<br />
out, have not clearly marked the path to follow what worked<br />
pointed<br />
32
one locale, didn't in another; programs for the black ghetto areas<br />
in<br />
to call for a different pattern of organization and control of<br />
seem<br />
than for white target areas; and centers for urban areas<br />
programs<br />
may be quite different from those established for less popu-<br />
generally<br />
areas. Perhaps all that can be done now is to continue raising<br />
lated<br />
issues and once considered, proceed in a tentative and experi-<br />
relevant<br />
fashion, always prepared to modify practices as experiences<br />
ential<br />
Some considerations follow:<br />
dictate.<br />
An experienced colleague of mine reiterates strongly<br />
i.<br />
position of considering this whole movement experi-<br />
the<br />
approach it openly, free of stron involvement;<br />
mentally;<br />
it out for six months or a year; evaluate the proce-<br />
try<br />
reaction and results; alter as necessary and<br />
dures,<br />
redesigning per subsequent conclusions. I trust<br />
continue<br />
it is possible to initiate these programs in a spirit<br />
that<br />
openness, no strong a priori biases, clearly from a<br />
of<br />
assuming that answers (especially general ones)<br />
position<br />
still unknown, and that we must be flexible enough<br />
are<br />
discover what works in each locale. You may, of<br />
to<br />
recognize that this approach is neither new nor<br />
course,<br />
does it insure success.<br />
Careful consideration should be given to the organiza-<br />
2.<br />
and control patterns of these comprehensive<br />
tional<br />
centers. In one part of the Advisory<br />
rehabilitation<br />
report they advocate that VR agencies<br />
Committee's<br />
such centers, while in another they recom-<br />
"establish"<br />
that VR agencies "take the initiative to establish"<br />
mend<br />
in appropriate areas. Implicit in the latter<br />
these<br />
are patterns of organization and control<br />
recommendations<br />
different from that implied in the former. Yet, if<br />
quite<br />
of comprehensive services to areas is to<br />
coordination<br />
a reality, somehow the resources and services of<br />
become<br />
health, welfare and education agencies should<br />
pertinent<br />
combined with those in the community and be made<br />
be<br />
available at the center to area residents. How<br />
directly<br />
may become a reality is still uncertain. Some VR<br />
this<br />
have proposed an informal arrangement (Allied<br />
agencies<br />
Council) in consort with many other state agencies;<br />
Agency<br />
have or are preparing and establishing such centers<br />
others<br />
their own and then inviting other services to join<br />
on<br />
Recently, following along with the intent of the<br />
them.<br />
in HEW, some states are considering legislation<br />
.changes<br />
a means of effecting coordination. Certain legislative<br />
as<br />
in Illinois, for instance, are pushing for a "super"<br />
leaders<br />
and welfare agency, under which such centers would<br />
health<br />
coordinated. It may well be that some mandate is neces-<br />
be<br />
to bring about this end. Other factors to consider<br />
sary<br />
in the organizational and control pattern are:<br />
33
Leadership in initiating the above may well be the<br />
a.<br />
of VR agencies;<br />
responsibility<br />
How to involve the community throughout the planning,<br />
b.<br />
and control phases;<br />
formulation<br />
Whether these centers should attempt to service large<br />
c.<br />
areas or whether small neighborhood centers should<br />
urban<br />
My personal predilection is for a large,<br />
prevail.<br />
facility in the heart of a needful urban area<br />
central<br />
responsibility is to coordinate and provide both<br />
whose<br />
and backup support to smaller neighborhood<br />
services<br />
Funding of these centers should be independ-<br />
centers.<br />
of the whims or peculiar status of any one agency.<br />
ent<br />
this respect, while I suspect my point of view isn't<br />
In<br />
popular, I would like to see developed a thoughtful<br />
too<br />
whereby sufficient funds are allocated for each<br />
plan<br />
area sucnt to provide thorough and compre-<br />
major<br />
rehabilitation services to its handicapped. It<br />
hensive<br />
be the responsibility of the central, coordinating<br />
would<br />
then to allocate funds for neighborhood projects<br />
facility<br />
centers based on immediate needs.<br />
and<br />
I suspect that little objection would be voiced if these<br />
d.<br />
(central) rehabilitation centers were<br />
comprehensive<br />
agency control as long as community involvement<br />
under<br />
more pronounced in the neighborhood centers. In<br />
was<br />
one of the functions of these central facilities<br />
fact,<br />
be to encourage urban tracts or neighborhoods to<br />
could<br />
action and establish programs designed to meet<br />
take<br />
specific needs and under their direction. These<br />
their<br />
centers could provide direction, consultation,<br />
central<br />
necessary funding to implement and sustain action<br />
the<br />
in the neighborhoods.<br />
A network of comprehensive service to a large urban<br />
e.<br />
includes then a large central facility under state<br />
area<br />
and smaller neighborhood centers coordinated<br />
control<br />
the center but under local control. As the<br />
through<br />
needs consultative, perhaps mobile, coordinating<br />
center<br />
so too should the local units provide outposted<br />
teams,<br />
to work right in the heart of neighborhoods.<br />
personnel<br />
the dream of making a significant impact on conditions<br />
If<br />
to and maintaining disability, deprivation and<br />
leading<br />
is to materialize, then provisions must be<br />
alienation<br />
to intervene where it counts in the home and<br />
made<br />
and in the community in which these conditions<br />
family<br />
Needed are community workers and planners,<br />
thrive.<br />
aides, neighborhood social workers and<br />
rehabilitation<br />
who not only work with (and refer) the handi-<br />
similar<br />
individuals, but who help mobilize and organize<br />
capped<br />
34
Who is to administer and supervise these larger centers as<br />
4.<br />
as coordinate the efforts of neighborhood and urban<br />
well<br />
Should it be an existing agency or one newly<br />
tracts?<br />
for that purpose? It must be pointed out that even<br />
created<br />
the advent of a super or general welfare agency in<br />
with<br />
the experiences and successes of VR agencies perforce<br />
states,<br />
consideration. Why not propose that VR agencies<br />
deserves<br />
the leadership and organize it along the lines that<br />
assume<br />
proven to be successful? Here is an agency that has<br />
have<br />
over the years a sound working philosophy, an<br />
demonstrated<br />
network of field work activities, a valid method<br />
established<br />
case management, and most of all, they now possess a<br />
of<br />
of professionals for supervisory and consultative<br />
supply<br />
Since the focal point of these centers is rehabili-<br />
purposes.<br />
the agency responsible for vocational rehabilitation<br />
tation,<br />
the logical choice. Any other choice would be at variance<br />
is<br />
existing practice and the intended purposes of the<br />
with<br />
of "comprehensive rehabilitation."<br />
concept<br />
of Universities Universities have an obvious and impor-<br />
Role<br />
part to play in this movement and it is imperative that they<br />
tant<br />
the bold steps consonant with this social action philosophy. The<br />
take<br />
of the battles in the academic family should be borne immediately<br />
brunt<br />
those involved in rehabilitation psychology and in rehabilitation<br />
by<br />
and perhaps by example, we may attract other social and<br />
counseling<br />
scientists into the action arena. What then are some courses<br />
behavioral<br />
action?<br />
of<br />
It is time we accepted more often (yes, even ferret out)<br />
i.<br />
to become members of planning and implementa-<br />
invitations<br />
groups. We should welcome and participate vigorously<br />
tion<br />
groups planning for comprehensive rehabilitation and<br />
in<br />
action, dare to speak out in support of progres-<br />
community<br />
movements and less and less be content with sitting<br />
sive<br />
in some kind of pompous judgment of those who confront<br />
back<br />
issues.<br />
reality<br />
I would even encourage that we move to cross-appoint staff<br />
2,<br />
action programs of various kinds shared staff.<br />
with<br />
close ties and channels for mutual feedback would<br />
The<br />
in many ways our training and research potential.<br />
enhance<br />
There should be no longer any qualms about training support<br />
3.<br />
in rehabilitation, and with the tie-in mentioned<br />
personnel<br />
most could be trained realistically in the field.<br />
above,<br />
supporting staff as rehabilitationaides, community<br />
Such<br />
evaluation aides, therapy aides, administrative<br />
workers,<br />
behavioral technicians, and others like them are<br />
aides,<br />
much sought personnel today.<br />
35
Professional programs for psychologists, counselors,<br />
4.<br />
etc. should be reassessed and revised to<br />
evaluators,<br />
reflect the changing emphases in the helping professions.<br />
New degree programs should be inaugurated in the Associate<br />
5.<br />
Arts degree (such as aides and technicians), Bachelor's<br />
of<br />
administrators, workshop supervisors, pro-<br />
(institutional<br />
etc.) and in graduate programs to meet new career<br />
grammers,<br />
demands.<br />
Active participation in continuous training programs for<br />
6.<br />
staff is another way in which universities can<br />
agency<br />
their resources and knowledge felt. Along this same<br />
make<br />
I am a firm believer that we educators and trainers<br />
line,<br />
the helping professions should be continuously involved<br />
in<br />
some measure of service, whether in a campus unit or in<br />
in<br />
outside agency, to keep current with existing practices<br />
an<br />
reality.<br />
and<br />
7. Then, of course, we<br />
shouldn't forget evaluation and research;<br />
is in this domain that our special forte lies, and it<br />
it<br />
be unfortunate if we ever defaulted in this responsi-<br />
would<br />
As suggested, these comprehensive centers need to<br />
bility.<br />
established on an experimental base and data has to be<br />
be<br />
and interpreted into new procedures. This is<br />
accumulated<br />
university personnel can be of real service. More-<br />
where<br />
these centers will most likely provide an excellent<br />
over,<br />
for field research of all kinds opportunities<br />
laboratory<br />
for graduate trainees and staff members alike.<br />
retrospect, I seem to have wandered considerably, factual<br />
In<br />
some sections, exhortive in others. Yet, perhaps to the reader it<br />
in<br />
quite obvious that I am indeed a biased presenter, for I am and<br />
is<br />
long advocated that if psychology (and counseling) is to reach<br />
have<br />
mature and valid base for existence, it must become a vital force<br />
a<br />
social planning and action. While not all my colleagues would so<br />
in<br />
I am heartened by the signs in the profession as a whole. So<br />
agree,<br />
am I an adherent of functional training programs in universities,<br />
too<br />
designed.to meet the demands of socio-economic living-working<br />
programs<br />
and test of the worth of higher education may well be the<br />
units,<br />
facility with which they can tool up to society's demands.<br />
in rehabilitation work should not be afraid to speak out,<br />
We<br />
with reservation and caution. While it may be not only bold<br />
albeit<br />
presumptious of me to speak out on a main social issue that con-<br />
but<br />
us now (the concept of comprehensive rehabilitation centers),<br />
fronts<br />
did stick my neck out. I'm not sure anything was resolved, but I<br />
I<br />
there was some germane issue to consider in planning this venture.<br />
trust<br />
may all boil down to nothing more than "nothing is certain now,<br />
It<br />
let's get about it."<br />
but<br />
36
Desisnated Organization<br />
CHAPTER III<br />
THE PLANNING ORGANIZATION<br />
designated organization for the planning project was<br />
The<br />
Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
the<br />
of 15 members. The grant application provided for their<br />
comprised<br />
as follows:<br />
appointment<br />
One member from the office of the Governor;<br />
member of the House of Representatives selected by<br />
One<br />
Speaker of the House of Representatives;<br />
the<br />
member of the House of Representatives selected by<br />
One<br />
Minority Leader of the House of Representatives;<br />
the<br />
member of the Senate selected by the MajoritY Leader<br />
One<br />
the Senate;<br />
of<br />
member of the Senate selected by the Minority Leader<br />
One<br />
the Senate:<br />
of<br />
members selected by the Governor representing a broad<br />
Ten<br />
area of concern in the field of vocational re-<br />
statewide<br />
In addition to members representing the<br />
habilitation.<br />
members should be selected from the following<br />
public,<br />
labor., commerce and industry, education, vocational<br />
fields:<br />
medicine, services for the blind, private<br />
rehabilitation,<br />
aiding the disabled, Governor's Employ the Handi-<br />
agencies<br />
Committee.<br />
capped<br />
The Planning Commission<br />
Planning Commission functioned as the policy board for the<br />
The<br />
providing overall leadership and administrative guidance<br />
project,<br />
the Statewide Planning Project. The Commission has met regularly,<br />
for<br />
least every second month, for sessions-that lasted either one or<br />
at<br />
days. The membership, as appointed by Governor Daniel J. Evans<br />
two<br />
in 1967, continued intact without change. The officials selected<br />
early<br />
the first meeting served throughout the two,year period. Their<br />
at<br />
and affiliations follow: David W. Peyton, Chairman, Program<br />
names<br />
and Planning Assistant, Office of the Governor; Roger C. Larson,<br />
37
of the members of the Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
Some<br />
in Washington State meet in Olympia in 1967. They<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
left to right: The Hon. John Merrill, State House of Represen-<br />
are,<br />
Senator Robert C. Ridder; Austin St. Laurent; Mrs. Helen<br />
tatives;<br />
Roger C. Larson; The Hon. Alfred O. Adams, M.D.; Donal R.<br />
Powers;<br />
M. o; oLo rd G. Marquardt; Mrs. Beryl Gridley;<br />
Sparkman,<br />
David C. Carson; Clarence T. Freeman.<br />
38
Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education<br />
Vice-Chairman,<br />
Men, Washington State University; and Donald Po Holden, Secretary,<br />
for<br />
State Supervisor, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
S tat ewid e Advisory Commit tee<br />
Statewide Advisory Committee was composed of the members<br />
The<br />
the task forces, individuals selected initially by job title and<br />
of<br />
previous services to vocational rehabilitation.<br />
following:<br />
For example, thetask forces sought their members from the<br />
of cities County commissioners<br />
Mayors<br />
superintendents County extension agents<br />
School<br />
officials Representatives of disability groups<br />
Labor<br />
education directors Legislators<br />
Special<br />
Leaders Members of Coordinating Council<br />
Civic<br />
and other medical News, Media<br />
Physicians<br />
State personnel<br />
personnel<br />
Rehabilitation County Health officers<br />
Vocational<br />
staff members<br />
letters of invitation were sent to these people to attend<br />
Individual<br />
meetings held in each of the eight geographic regions into<br />
regional<br />
the state was divided for the project. The.meetings were held<br />
which<br />
the daytime in public places. Accompanying the invitations<br />
during<br />
small packets of materials describing the Planning Commission,<br />
were<br />
objectives, and scope. At themeeting they were invited to par-<br />
its<br />
further in the work of the Planning Commission. Those that<br />
ticipate<br />
to do so became members of the task forces. Much of the<br />
elected<br />
of the task forces was done during 1968. The names of the in-<br />
work<br />
who served on the. task forces are listed in the Appendix.<br />
dividuals<br />
Task Forces<br />
operational plan provided for the creation of six task<br />
The<br />
in any one of the eight regions. None of the regional groups<br />
forces<br />
to have more than five task forces. The task force titles<br />
elected<br />
listed as follows:<br />
are<br />
Force I Prevalence of the Disabled<br />
Task<br />
Force II Facilities Sheltered Workshops Rehabili-<br />
Task<br />
Resources<br />
tation<br />
Force III- Interagency Coordination<br />
Task<br />
Force IV Vocational Training and Technical Changes<br />
Task<br />
Force V Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped<br />
Task<br />
Task Force VI Selected Locally<br />
39
c<br />
o o<br />
:r<br />
m o<br />
I." 1 0<br />
f 0 h<br />
0<br />
m 0
Assistant Project Director, Allan Go Wood, functioned<br />
The<br />
the staff coordinator of the task forces. He attended many of<br />
as<br />
meetings, furnished copies of relevant documents to the task<br />
the<br />
and conferred regularly with the leaders of each task force<br />
forces,<br />
assure that they would continue to progress with their study.<br />
to<br />
task forces themselves,-however, were given considerable latitude<br />
The<br />
their methods of operation and in their reports. This diversity<br />
in<br />
attested to by the conflicting reports prepared by some of them.<br />
is<br />
This diversity was welcomed.<br />
Regional Committees<br />
task forces were organized in regions. Eight regions<br />
The<br />
the state were designated on the basis ofdemographic data supplied<br />
of<br />
the State of Washington's Planning and Community Affairs Agency.<br />
by<br />
regional committee was headed by a chairman or by a co-chairman<br />
Each<br />
by the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
selected<br />
of these chairmen were themselves members of the Commission,<br />
Several<br />
of the leaders were Legislators. All the committees operated in<br />
Two<br />
politically nonpartisan way. Efforts were made to include the<br />
a<br />
of both labor and industry, .all major disability groups, and<br />
views<br />
like. Partisans of particular viewpoints were welcomed, but did<br />
the<br />
not dominate the regional committees.<br />
Subcontractors<br />
Greenleigh Assoeiates, Inc.<br />
in the planning project Greenleigh Associates, Inc.,<br />
Early<br />
management consulting firm in New York City, was asked to do a<br />
a<br />
This study was to provide the Commission with information<br />
study.<br />
where in government vocational rehabilitation serviceS should<br />
about<br />
After the contract was signed, but before any work was done on<br />
be.<br />
information about the contract was provided the leaders of a<br />
it,<br />
of state agencies. These leaders of other state agencies<br />
number<br />
to object to this study and it was cancelled.<br />
tended<br />
of the reasons for the objection was that Governor Daniel<br />
One<br />
Evans had appointed a task force of eminent citizens of thestate<br />
J.<br />
make recommendations about where all of the executive agencies of<br />
to<br />
government should be placed. The leaders of these many agencies<br />
the<br />
consulted as to their own recommendations for their agencies and<br />
were<br />
It was felt that the Greenleigh Associates, Inc. study, being<br />
others.<br />
as it was on one agency alone, would be unable to have the<br />
focused<br />
and the vision of those involved in the Governor's task force<br />
breadth<br />
on<br />
executive reorganization.<br />
41
authors of REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE PROGRAMS PROVIDED<br />
The<br />
STATE AGENCIES are photographed together with the book. Left to<br />
BY<br />
David C. Carson, Project Director, Planning Commission for<br />
right:<br />
Rehabilitation; John B. Welsh, Jr., Attorney for the Wash-<br />
Vocational<br />
State Legislative Council; E. M. Oliver, Director, Division of<br />
ington<br />
RehablJtationo Since 1945 Mro Oliver has been the chief<br />
Vocational<br />
officer for Vocational Rehabilitation in Washington<br />
administrative<br />
State.<br />
42
Legislative Council<br />
Legislative Council of the State of Washington has par-<br />
The<br />
importantly in the work of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />
ticipated<br />
Rehabilitation. The Legislative Council is an official non-<br />
tional<br />
body created by the State Legislature td provide legal and<br />
partisan<br />
services to the Legislature. Members of the State House of<br />
other<br />
and the State Senate from both parties participate<br />
Representatives<br />
the work of the Legislative Council. Mr. Don Sampson is the<br />
in<br />
secretary. One of their attorneys, John B. Welsh, Jr., was<br />
executive<br />
by the Legislative Council to work part-time for the<br />
assigned<br />
Commission.<br />
Planning<br />
principal services were provided by the Legislative<br />
Two<br />
One of these was a compilation of laws relating to Voca-<br />
Council.<br />
Rehabilitation, a review of rehabilitation services of six<br />
tional<br />
state agencies and the interagency agreements which have<br />
different<br />
the effect of laws concerning vocational rehabilitation.<br />
second function was the drafting of laws recommended<br />
The<br />
the Planning Commission. The staff of the Legislative Council<br />
by<br />
done and is doing this task. The printed report of these find-<br />
has<br />
REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE--PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY STATE<br />
ings,<br />
was the result of this study authorized by the Planning<br />
AGENCIES,<br />
through a contract signed with the Washington State Legis-<br />
Commission<br />
lative Council in November 1967.<br />
Interagency Liaison<br />
the State of Washington a Workshop and Facilities<br />
Within<br />
Program financed by federal funds has been the responsibility<br />
Planning<br />
Payson H. Jeynes of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, in<br />
of<br />
The Planning Commission has worked with Mr. Jeynes and others<br />
Olympia.<br />
assist in his planning. Our Task Force II on Workshops Facilities,<br />
to<br />
Resources served as the regional advisory committee for this re-<br />
and<br />
facilities service. The aim of the Planning Commission<br />
habilitation<br />
to provide services for all those individuals who need help from<br />
is<br />
facilities, and resources so that by 1975 everyone in the<br />
workshops,<br />
needing these services will be able to receive them.<br />
state<br />
Comprehensive Health Planni$.<br />
the time Comprehensive Health Planning was authorized<br />
At<br />
1967, Governor Daniel J. Evans specified that it would be handled<br />
in<br />
the Planning and Community Affairs Agency of the State of<br />
through<br />
Prior to the staffing of the program with full-time<br />
Washington.<br />
a program management group made up of planners from other<br />
people,<br />
in the Health, Welfare, Manpower, Budget, and management<br />
agencies<br />
services was set up. The project director of the Planning Commission<br />
43
Vocational Rehabilitation was appointed to this Program Manage-<br />
for<br />
Group and served regularly on it. This helped to insure that<br />
ment<br />
Comprehensive Health Planning would have some flavor of vocational<br />
the<br />
It also insured that the major coordination of activ-<br />
rehabilitation.<br />
provided by the Program Management Group would influence the<br />
ities<br />
Commission.<br />
Planning<br />
Meeting of Planners University of WaShington<br />
meeting called by the staff of the Planning Commission<br />
A<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation was held in September 1967, at the<br />
for<br />
University of Washington.<br />
number of state agencies and university departments were<br />
A<br />
This is reported in further detail in Chapter V.<br />
represented.<br />
(See. Appendix for Minutes).<br />
Services to the Deaf<br />
series of meetings concerning services to the deaf were<br />
A<br />
by the project director of'the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />
called<br />
Rehabilitation. Invited to the meetings were representatives<br />
tional<br />
professional organizations providing services for the deaf: public<br />
of<br />
State School for the Deaf, specil education section of the<br />
schools,<br />
Superintendent of Public Instruction, State Health Department,<br />
State<br />
Department of Institutions, private non-profit groups providing<br />
the<br />
for the deaf, university departments providing special<br />
services<br />
and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Some deaf<br />
therapy,<br />
were also invited in each instance.<br />
leaders<br />
series of meetings resulted in a permanent council of<br />
The<br />
the deaf. The purpose of the council is to coordinate<br />
agenciesserving<br />
agency services and to assist in legislative and other endeavors.<br />
Trips t__o Rehabilitation Facilities<br />
Commission assumed that the cooperation of other agencies<br />
The<br />
be required if the State of Washington would have a Comprehensive<br />
would<br />
Center and a Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Accordingly, staff members of several other state agencies<br />
Center.<br />
Washington State were invited to accompany Planning Commission<br />
in<br />
and staff on fact-finding tours of similar facilities in other<br />
members<br />
Included were representatives of Central Budget Agency, Depart-<br />
states.<br />
of Institutions, Department of Labor and Industries, Department<br />
ment<br />
Public Assistance, Employment Security Department, and the Division<br />
of<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation. The reports of these activities are<br />
of<br />
described further in Chapter V.<br />
44
The Staff<br />
staff of the Planning Commission has been composed of<br />
The<br />
following individuals:<br />
the<br />
were:<br />
Consultants<br />
C. Carson, M.A., Project Director<br />
David<br />
G. Wood, B.A., Assistant Project Director<br />
Allan<br />
J. Simila, Administrative Secretary<br />
Mary<br />
C. Benedict, Secretary<br />
Mary<br />
The following part-time and temporary clerical employees<br />
Mead<br />
Marjorie<br />
Johns<br />
Joyce<br />
Alix Trager<br />
Engle<br />
Darlene<br />
Howard<br />
Maryrose<br />
Consultants have included the following listed individuals:<br />
William Wolfe, Director of Department of Special<br />
Dr.<br />
University of Texas<br />
Education,<br />
Hoyt Ponder, University of Washington<br />
Dr.<br />
Jeffrey G. Shapiro, Arkansas Rehabilitation<br />
Dr.<br />
and Training Center<br />
Research<br />
Albin, Computer Programmer, University of<br />
Wayne<br />
Washington<br />
Ayers, graduate student in the Vocational<br />
Andrea<br />
Counselor Training Program, University<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Washington<br />
of<br />
Lurie, graduate student in the Vocational<br />
Joseph<br />
Counselor Training Program, University<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
of Washington<br />
Staff Functions "Donated"<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation graciously offered<br />
The<br />
provide staff assistance and other services to the Planning Com-<br />
to<br />
for Vocational Rehabilitation. They specifically authorized<br />
mission<br />
services for two research analysts and one public relations<br />
half-time<br />
In addition, all the bookkeeping and accounting services were<br />
man.<br />
by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. For payroll<br />
provided<br />
the staff of the Planning Commissionwas served by the<br />
services<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation. Thetime actually served by<br />
Division<br />
the three half-time staff members was minimal. They are:<br />
45
Gibson, Research Analyst<br />
Norman<br />
Mead, Research Analyst<br />
Jean<br />
Elton Troth, Information Officer<br />
M. Oliver, Director of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />
E.<br />
as Consultant to the Planning Commission.<br />
served<br />
functioning of the office of the Planning Commission<br />
The<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation, like the functioning of many other<br />
for<br />
offices, was largely influenced by the clerical staff. The<br />
similar<br />
operation is attributable in great part to the administrative<br />
smooth<br />
Mary Simila. She assisted admirably the other staff<br />
secretary,<br />
and was able to help get them to push the project toward<br />
members<br />
The other permanent secretary, Mary Benedict, worked<br />
completion.<br />
the task forces. She was largely responsible for the cler-<br />
with<br />
services to the task forces. She was able to complete this<br />
ical<br />
work with a minimum of supervision.<br />
important<br />
Jean Mead has been a valued and loyal member of the<br />
Mrs.<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation for. several years. As research<br />
staff<br />
with overall supervision of the library of Vocational<br />
analyst<br />
she has learned which resources are available in<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
She not only helped provide these sources to the Planning<br />
print.<br />
she worked to help improve the style of the writings of<br />
Commission;<br />
Commission. Much of her work has had to be done after her reg-<br />
the<br />
employment was completed. Graceful touches in this and other<br />
ular<br />
materials of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />
written<br />
are often the product of Jean Mead. The Commission is par-<br />
tation<br />
grateful to Mrs. Simila, Mrs. Benedict, and Mrs. Mead for<br />
ticularly<br />
yeoman service.<br />
their<br />
M. Oliver has been State Director of Vocational Rehab-<br />
E.<br />
in Washington State since 1945. His national reputation<br />
ilitation<br />
vocational rehabilitation is deserved. The assistance.given<br />
in<br />
Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation and its staff<br />
the<br />
Mr. Oliver and the other staff members of Vocational Rehabili-<br />
by<br />
is hereby gratefully acknowledged. Mr. Oliver, on behalf<br />
tation<br />
the agency, applied for the grant which funded this two-year<br />
of<br />
proect. He served conscientiously the Planning Commission<br />
long<br />
as its Consultant.<br />
Planning Commission hereby acknowledges with gratitude<br />
The<br />
assistance given it by the Office of the Governor and by officials<br />
the<br />
other governmental agencies. The contribution of the private sector<br />
of<br />
rehabilitation has been an important one. Some 700 of these indi-<br />
in<br />
who worked on the task forces and in other ways have been given<br />
viduals<br />
of appreciation signed by Daniel J. Evans, Governor of the<br />
certificates<br />
of Washington, in appreciation for their "valued contribution and<br />
State<br />
dedication in planning services for the handicapped and dis-<br />
continued<br />
advantaged to enable them to become employable."<br />
46
CHAPTER IV<br />
METHOD OF OPERATION<br />
November 1967, the organization of the state into regions<br />
In<br />
task forces began. The Assistant Project Director was assigned<br />
and<br />
this responsibility.<br />
one person would be supervising the fact-gathering<br />
Since<br />
of the study, the size of the regions, both in terms of popula-<br />
phase<br />
as well as geography, was considered to be important. Existing<br />
tion<br />
divisions were considered. The six districts of the Division<br />
state<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation were rejected as being too large, making<br />
of<br />
difficult to bring representative people together for meetings.<br />
it<br />
13 divisions of the state used by the State Planning and Community<br />
The<br />
Agency were studied. These were also rejected as the time<br />
Affairs<br />
would not allow for the organizing and completion of the<br />
schedule<br />
in so many regions.<br />
survey<br />
the state was divided into eight convenient<br />
Ultimately,<br />
determined by concentration of population and accessibility<br />
regions<br />
to a suitable meeting place. (See map on preceding page.)<br />
each of the eight regions a general chairman was selected.<br />
For<br />
two regions two persons served as co-chairmen. Appropriately<br />
In<br />
scheduled organizational meetings were arranged in each region.<br />
sufficient time to allow for a response, letters of<br />
In<br />
were sent to county health officers, county commissioners,<br />
invitation<br />
school superintendents, heads of state agencies, labor union<br />
county<br />
mayors of.cities, heads of hospitals and institutions, presi-<br />
leaders,<br />
of chapters of the Washington Association for Retarded Children,<br />
dents<br />
of Economic Opportunity staff members, members of health coun-<br />
Office<br />
members of the Coordinating Council for Occupational Education,<br />
cils,<br />
of the Community College Board, county extension agents, and<br />
members<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation staff members, as well as<br />
Division<br />
Enclosed with these invitations were information sheets<br />
legislators.<br />
the scope and purpose of the planning project. The letter<br />
explaining<br />
invitation asked the person if he would come to work. Approximately<br />
of<br />
one hundred people attended each o2 the eight regional meetings.<br />
was planned that the task forces.would meet monthly for<br />
It<br />
six months. Most of the meetings were held in 1968,<br />
approximately<br />
the reports of the task forces being received by regional chair-<br />
with<br />
in the autumn.<br />
men<br />
47
47( )
attempt was made to assist the task forces, particu-<br />
An<br />
in routine ways. For example, a task force secretary could<br />
larly<br />
one copy of the minutes of a meeting to the project office,<br />
send<br />
the project office staff would make appropriate copies and<br />
where<br />
them to the task force members. Copies of relevant<br />
distribute<br />
were provided task force members. Final reports of one<br />
documents<br />
force were sent to similar task forces throughout the state.<br />
task<br />
Assistant Project Director contacted the chairman of each task<br />
The<br />
on a regular basis, attended a number of the meetings, and<br />
force<br />
the task forces to gather information helpful to them-<br />
encouraged<br />
and to the Planning Commission. Guidelines for the final<br />
selves<br />
were distributed.<br />
reports<br />
Force I, on the Prevalence of Disability, had<br />
Task<br />
assistance from the staff and from graduate students employed<br />
special<br />
to gather data.<br />
Force II, Workshops, Facilities, and Resources, had<br />
Task<br />
its objective a comprehensive study of workshops and facilities.<br />
for<br />
the eight study groups was Payson Jeynes, State Supervisor<br />
Assisting<br />
Facility Services for the Division of Vocational<br />
forRehabilitation<br />
Mr. Jeynes served a dual purpose in his consulting<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
He served the Planning Commission as he gathered information<br />
role.<br />
be incorporated into his Interim State Plan for Workshops and<br />
to<br />
Facilities.<br />
proved to be a satisfactory arrangement and Mr. Jeynes<br />
This<br />
helpful in providing expert direction to the task forces as they<br />
was<br />
to assess the kinds and quality of workshops and facilities<br />
sought<br />
available to certain handicapped people in this state.<br />
now<br />
helpful to this.phase of the study was a comprehensive<br />
Also<br />
detailed directory by Betty Marion, Charles Freeman, Carolyn<br />
and<br />
and Larry Paustian, graduate students in Vocational Counsel-<br />
Fisher,<br />
at the University of Washington. Dr. Jerald Forster provided<br />
ing<br />
direction and editorial comments. It was published in the<br />
general<br />
of 1968 by the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />
summer<br />
tation.<br />
members of the five task forces in each region met as<br />
The<br />
Almost without exception they worked conscientiously to<br />
scheduled.<br />
their tasks. In so doing they learned about the present<br />
complete<br />
to rehabilitate the handicapped and disadvantaged, heard<br />
program<br />
reports of its limitations, and suggested improvements.<br />
candid discussions about vocational rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
the task force meetings and the resulting frank reports taught<br />
in<br />
participants how marvelous this program of vocational rehabili-<br />
the<br />
can be and how inadequately it is now serving the people of<br />
tation<br />
State of Washington. More community leaders have seriously<br />
the<br />
the rehabilitation program than ever before. Their<br />
considered<br />
48
are sensible, practical, reflect their concern for<br />
recommendations<br />
in the delivery of services.<br />
improvements<br />
------A PROBLEM FOR TASK FORCES, TOO<br />
in the social sciences is inherently difficult;<br />
Research<br />
can one construct a project that meets all the<br />
rarely<br />
for scientific precision and o.rderliness that<br />
criteria<br />
some of the elegant research designs One<br />
characterizes<br />
in the physical sciences. For obvious reasons,<br />
finds<br />
research is even more difficult.<br />
evaluative<br />
Guidelines for Task Forces<br />
E. Carroll, Director<br />
Terence<br />
Institutes on Rehabili-<br />
Nat'l<br />
tation and Health Services<br />
the following page is a brief description of the several<br />
On<br />
forces. Each person invited to a regional meeting was handed<br />
task<br />
a sheet to help him decide on which of the task forces he would<br />
such<br />
It was felt that self-selection was the best technique.<br />
serve.<br />
guidelines prepared by the staff for each of the task<br />
The<br />
were handed the members after they had selected a particular<br />
forces<br />
force. These guidelines were modeled after those of the State-<br />
task<br />
Rehabilitation Planning Project of the State of Texas. The<br />
wide<br />
guidelines were designed by John Fenoglio and the other assist-<br />
Texas<br />
project director there, before he became Project Director in the<br />
ant<br />
State of Washington. Copies of the guidelines follow.<br />
49
WASHINGTON STATE PLNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
Task Force I The Disabled<br />
TASK FORCES<br />
purpose of this group is to determine the prevalence of disability in the<br />
The<br />
The categories of disability are broad ones which include physical limita-<br />
region.<br />
emotional problems, intellectual retardation, and cultural deprivation.<br />
tions,<br />
who are in prisons, reformatories, jails, mental hospitals, schools for the<br />
Those<br />
and special education classes have handicaps. Most of the 80,000 adults<br />
retarded,<br />
Washington State who cannot read at the sixth grade level are handicapped<br />
in<br />
Those receiving public assistance generally are handicapped. The<br />
vocationally.<br />
person and the migrant farm worker often is handicapped. Handicapping<br />
displaced<br />
tend to increase with age and with poverty. Determine who has what dis-<br />
conditions<br />
how many have multiple handicaps.<br />
ability,<br />
Force II Rehabilitation Facilities Sheltered Wrkshops Rehabilitation<br />
Task<br />
Resources<br />
purpose of this task force is to study the kinds of agencies listed above.<br />
The<br />
presently available in your region should be studied to determine the need<br />
Those<br />
them, the need for changes in them, the need for new ones. What disability<br />
for<br />
are served by them? How effective are the staff members? How does the<br />
groups<br />
unit cost compare with other such institutions? How well do they diagnose,•<br />
per<br />
and/or train the vocationally handicapped? Are adequate services available<br />
treat,<br />
or not in your region?<br />
Task Force III- Interagency Coordination<br />
problems are multiple and interrelated and do not fit into a single<br />
People's<br />
for service by any one agency. There has been a proliferation of agencies,<br />
category<br />
public and private. Poor organization, duplication, gaps in services, cross-<br />
both<br />
and confusion are hurtful to the handicapped and induce or continue de-<br />
purposes<br />
Services should be provided in a frugal way. The purpose of this task<br />
pendency.<br />
is to study interagency coordination and to recommend improvements in the<br />
force<br />
delivery system of services to the handicapped.<br />
Task Force IV Vocational Training and Technical Changes<br />
This task force has four primary objectives:<br />
To identify present training facilities<br />
i.<br />
To consider needs for new, improved, or expanded<br />
2.<br />
acilities<br />
training<br />
TO determine what gaps exist in present vocational<br />
3.<br />
training<br />
To enumerate technical changes which presently<br />
4.<br />
require job training or retraining<br />
Task Force V Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped<br />
purpose of this task force is to consider those regulatory, architectural,<br />
The<br />
informational, legislative, educational, and other barriers to the<br />
financial,<br />
of the handicapped. The elimination or the reduction of these barriers<br />
employment<br />
the goal.<br />
is<br />
Task Force VI Selected Locally<br />
Chairmen are encouraged to organize additional task force(s) to meet<br />
Regional<br />
needs.<br />
local<br />
50<br />
DGG 2/23/68
1-30-68<br />
WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
TASK FORCE I THE DISABLED<br />
Guidelines<br />
order to really know the correlation between the disabled and the services<br />
In<br />
to them it is important to determine the number of disabled residing<br />
available<br />
in this region. Useful data might be obtained by:<br />
A comprehensive survey of categories of disabled persons within<br />
Ao<br />
region at present through:<br />
our<br />
Local office of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
i.<br />
State Department of Public Assistance<br />
2.<br />
Services to the Blind<br />
3.<br />
Social Security Administration, Disability Determination<br />
4.<br />
Schools Local and State offices<br />
5.<br />
Community agencies, i.e., Red Cross, Heart, Cancer,<br />
6.<br />
Associations, etc.<br />
Tuberculosis<br />
Other sources which you may develop, both private and public<br />
7.<br />
B. Recommendations should<br />
Be based on providing comprehensive vocatlonal.rehabilltatlon<br />
i.<br />
to all the disabled who need, desire and would most<br />
services<br />
likely be eligible for such services by 1975.<br />
Be put on a priority basis in order to meetimmediate needs<br />
2.<br />
to plan for long range needs<br />
and<br />
kinds of information helpful to members of this task force will be<br />
Certain<br />
by the staff. Present and projected population figures, the numbers<br />
provided<br />
kinds of medical, dental, psychological, and other staff members, and the<br />
and<br />
will be provided where possible.<br />
like<br />
¸51
TASK FORCE I qUE, STIONNAIP.<br />
Services available to the disabled include: I. Diagnostic;<br />
Io<br />
Treatment; and 3. Evaluation and training. In your research did<br />
2.<br />
find the disabled appropriating these available services; if so,<br />
you<br />
what degree? If not, why not? In what wys might they be improved?<br />
to<br />
Note your impressions by the following categories:<br />
A. Physical disabilities<br />
Psycho social disabilities<br />
C. Mentally Iii<br />
D. Mentally Retarded<br />
E. Blind and Visually disabled<br />
F. Deaf<br />
G. Aged<br />
H. Migrant Workers<br />
I. Others<br />
52
What recommendations do you suggest, from the viewpoint of the<br />
II.<br />
you have contacted for new, mproved or expanded services,<br />
handicapped<br />
order that comprehensive vocational rehabilitation services might<br />
in<br />
provided for your reglon/county?<br />
be<br />
53
Disability Categories<br />
(Applicable to Agencies for the Blind)<br />
Blind<br />
Visual Impairments<br />
Other<br />
Impairments<br />
Hearing<br />
Deaf<br />
Totally<br />
Orthopedic deformity or impairments except<br />
Other<br />
(make maximum breakdowns<br />
amputations<br />
as paraplegia)<br />
such<br />
or Amputation of Members<br />
Absence<br />
Personality Disorders<br />
Mentaland<br />
Disorders<br />
Psychotic<br />
Disorders<br />
Neurotic<br />
Alcoholism<br />
Addiction<br />
Drug<br />
character, personality, and<br />
Other<br />
disorders<br />
behavior<br />
Conditions<br />
Cardiac<br />
Circulatory Conditions<br />
Other<br />
Diseases<br />
Respiratory<br />
System Disorders<br />
Digestive<br />
Retardation<br />
Mental<br />
if possible; mild, moderate,<br />
(breakdown,<br />
severe)<br />
and<br />
Cancer<br />
Stroke<br />
Impairments<br />
Speech,<br />
if possible; such as Functional,<br />
(breakdown,<br />
Palate, laryngectomies, Aphasia)<br />
Cleft<br />
Others<br />
All<br />
maximum breakdowns feasible; such as<br />
(make<br />
Palsy, Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis,<br />
Cerebral<br />
Dystrophy, Parkinson's Disease,<br />
uscular<br />
Diabetes, Haemophilia, etc.)<br />
Colostomies,<br />
54
WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
TASK FORCE II WORKSHOPS FACILITIES AND RESOURCES<br />
set of Definitions and Guidelines is furnished to provide direction for<br />
This<br />
research. The definitions are established by statute.<br />
the<br />
DEFINITIONS:<br />
Rehabilitation Facility<br />
facility operated for the primary purpose of assisting in the rehabili-<br />
A<br />
of handicapped persons:<br />
tation<br />
1. Providing one of the following types of services:<br />
Or<br />
Provided:<br />
Testing, fitting or training in the use of prostheses.<br />
(a)<br />
Pre-vocational or conditioning therapy.<br />
(b)<br />
Physical therapy or occupational therapy.<br />
(c)<br />
Adjustment training.<br />
(d)<br />
(e) Evaluation, treatment, or control of special disabilities.<br />
Where there is provided an integrated program of medical,<br />
2.<br />
psychological, social and vocational evaluation<br />
vocational,<br />
and services under competent professional supervision.<br />
The major portion of such evaluation and services is furnished<br />
i.<br />
the facility.<br />
within<br />
All medical and health services are prescribed and/or super-<br />
2.<br />
by a physician.<br />
vised<br />
Sheltered Workshop<br />
place where any manufacture or handiwork is carried on and which is<br />
A<br />
primarily to provide gainful employment for severely handicapped<br />
operated<br />
persons:<br />
As an interim step in the rehabilitation process toward<br />
i.<br />
employment in the competitive labor market; or<br />
permanent<br />
While employment opportunities for them do not.exist in the<br />
2.<br />
labor market.<br />
competitive<br />
55
Rehabilitation Resource<br />
comprehensive rehabilitation planning, a program of activities is<br />
For<br />
rehabilitation "resource" when<br />
a<br />
The program meets neither the Federal definitions of<br />
i.<br />
facility" nor "sheltered workshop", and<br />
"rehabilitation<br />
The program treats chronic, non-self-terminating physical,<br />
2.<br />
or emotional handicapping conditions, and<br />
mental,<br />
The services of the program contribute significantly to a<br />
3.<br />
plan with a vocational objective, and<br />
rehabilitation<br />
The program accepts direct referrals from DVR, with or<br />
4.<br />
payment of fees, costs, etc. by DVR.<br />
without<br />
in this task force will function as the regional advisory committee for<br />
Those<br />
State of Washington Workshop and Facility.Planning headed by Payson H.<br />
the<br />
Rehabilitation Facility Services, P. O. Box 528, Olympia, Washington<br />
Jeynes,<br />
The aim of the planning is to provide services for all those individ-<br />
98501.<br />
who need help from workshops, facilities, and resou=ces so that by the<br />
uals<br />
1975 everyone in the state needing these services will be able to receive<br />
year<br />
them.<br />
5.6
GUIDELINES<br />
Guidelines may be modified to serve as workable instruments suited to<br />
These<br />
area being studied.<br />
the<br />
vocational rehabilitation process is cnplex, and in effect, represents a<br />
The<br />
of the services of numerous facilities and disciplines on the problems<br />
focusing<br />
the disabled person. One counselor working alone woid rehabilitate very<br />
of<br />
people, but with a comprehensive range of services available to draw upon<br />
few<br />
can do an effective job for his clients. For this reason workshops, facili-<br />
he<br />
and other resources are essential factorsin providing for comprehensive<br />
ties<br />
vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
The following points are suggested as guidelines for task forces:<br />
i. Analysis of regional workshops.<br />
General sheltered workshops<br />
A.<br />
Number of Handicapped served.<br />
I.<br />
2. Range of skills required to do the variety of jobs offered.<br />
Specialized workshops<br />
B.<br />
By type of disability.<br />
i.<br />
Blind or visually disabled.<br />
a.<br />
Mentally retarded.<br />
b.<br />
Mentally ill.<br />
c.<br />
Orthopedic impairments.<br />
d.<br />
e.<br />
Cerebral palsied.<br />
Epileptic.<br />
f.<br />
Aged.<br />
g.<br />
By rehabilitation goals or type of operation. What produced.<br />
2.<br />
Evaluation.<br />
a.<br />
Personal habits.<br />
(i)<br />
Work adjustment.<br />
(2)<br />
Employment potential.<br />
(3)<br />
Terminal.<br />
b.<br />
For those considered unable to ever work<br />
(i)<br />
the competitive job market.<br />
in<br />
Severely disabled.<br />
(2)<br />
Aged.<br />
(3)<br />
Staffing<br />
C.<br />
Is staffing adequate?<br />
i.<br />
Does staff meet professional standards?<br />
2.<br />
Are volunteers being effectively utilized?<br />
3.<br />
Utilization of present workshops, facilities, and resources<br />
D.<br />
Are services available to all the disabled in ourregion<br />
i.<br />
need or request them?<br />
who<br />
Are there overlaps in services offered by various workshops,<br />
2.<br />
facilities, and resources?<br />
Projection of needfor additional workshops, facilities, and resources<br />
E.<br />
How many more disabled can be expected to need services in<br />
i.<br />
region by 1975? (Correlate with findings of Task Force I)<br />
.this<br />
How must workshops, facilities, and resources be modified or<br />
2.<br />
to accommodate these needs?<br />
expanded<br />
57
TASK FORCE II .QUES.TIONNAIRE<br />
What workshops, facilities, and resources in the region or county are now pro-<br />
I.<br />
the following types of personal treatment services to the disabled?<br />
viding<br />
A. Diagnosis(Name)<br />
Is there, in the region or the county, a comprehensive workshop,<br />
i.<br />
or resource for disability diagnosis?<br />
facility,<br />
a. If yes, describe it<br />
all present workshops, facilities, and resources being utilized<br />
Are<br />
the disabled?<br />
for<br />
a. If yes, how?<br />
b. If no, why not?<br />
What are the present capacities of diagnostic workshops, facilities,<br />
3.<br />
resources serving the disabled?<br />
and<br />
What additional diagnostic workshops, facilities, and resources are<br />
4.<br />
needed?<br />
58
B. Treatment (List by types of service offered)<br />
Are all workshops, treatment facilities, and resources being utilized<br />
I.<br />
the purpose of providing vocational rehabilitation services to<br />
for<br />
disabled?<br />
the<br />
If yes., how?<br />
a.<br />
b. If no, why not?<br />
What are the individual and combined capacities of workshops, treatment<br />
2.<br />
and resources in terms of the number of disabled they can<br />
facilities,<br />
serve at one time?<br />
Wha additional workshops, treatment facillt±es, and resources in<br />
3.<br />
opinion, would best accomplish the goal of this study?<br />
your<br />
C. Evaluation and Training (List sope of each)<br />
59
How are present evaluation and training workshops, facilities,<br />
i.<br />
resources being utilized in the vocational rehabilitation of<br />
and<br />
the disabled?<br />
How many disabled individuals can be served currently by these<br />
2.<br />
facilities, and resources?<br />
workshops,<br />
Write your own analysis of the workshops, facilities, and resources in<br />
II.<br />
region or county, based on what you have observed during the course<br />
your<br />
this study. Please make recommendations for new, expanded or modi-<br />
of<br />
workshops, facilities, and resources on a priority basis.<br />
fied<br />
60
WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
TASK FORCE III INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION<br />
Guidelines<br />
11/21/67<br />
problems are multiple and interrelated and do not fit into a single<br />
People's<br />
for service by any one agency; therefore, to m6et clients' needs,<br />
category<br />
must have access to many types of specialized services. Consequently,<br />
agencies<br />
are dependent upon one another if they are to provide adequately for<br />
agencies<br />
their clients.<br />
might assume that these agencies would be fully aware of each other's<br />
One<br />
and would constantly refer cass to each other. Unfortunately, this<br />
services<br />
not generally the case. It has been found that agencies in general do not<br />
is<br />
what other agencies are doing or planning, even if they both are concerned<br />
know<br />
the same category of disability. Much of this problem is owing to lack of<br />
with<br />
media through which thinking and information could be exchanged.<br />
communication<br />
To study these problems this task force is to:<br />
and analyze current inter-agency coordination.<br />
Study<br />
together members of thevarious local agencies that provide<br />
Bring<br />
services to the handicapped and exchange information.<br />
Survey the agencies serving the region.<br />
ways by which closer coordination can be accomplished<br />
Recommend<br />
all community agencies both private and public to<br />
between<br />
in greater benefits for all the handicapped population in the<br />
result<br />
region.<br />
Suggested means for achieving these goals:<br />
Ascertain existing agencies functioning in the region.<br />
1.<br />
Determine its authority (federal, state, local, public, private,<br />
a.<br />
etc.)<br />
Determine its purpose {type of service provided or which<br />
b.<br />
category)<br />
handicap<br />
Coordinated with which community services or agencies.<br />
c.<br />
Procedures for Inter-Agency Exchange<br />
2.<br />
Determine referral procedures<br />
a.<br />
criterion<br />
(1)<br />
data required<br />
(2)<br />
standard fees<br />
(5)<br />
inter-agency staffing<br />
(4)<br />
Joint programs<br />
b.<br />
to sponsor activities of mutual,benefit<br />
(1)<br />
leadership training<br />
(a)<br />
operate common facility<br />
(b)<br />
Consider adequacy of present and projected inter-agency coo.rdination and<br />
5.<br />
ways in which closer cooperation between agencies providing<br />
recommend<br />
can be developed to provide adequate vocational rehabilitation<br />
services<br />
to fulfill the need of the handicapped individuals.<br />
services<br />
.61
TASK FORCE III UESTIO,NNAIRE<br />
questionnaire is provided for optional use in cgnJunction with the<br />
This<br />
Force III Guidelines. It is not intended to be comprehensive or<br />
Task<br />
but merely a beginning for the task force members to pur-<br />
all-inclusive<br />
and study in depth those areas of interest to the local community.<br />
sue<br />
I. What local agencies are providing services to the handicapped<br />
A. Whattypes of srvices are provided?<br />
B. Cost of service?<br />
C. Restrictions--age, sex, type of disability, etc.<br />
II. Referral Policy<br />
A. What method is used?<br />
B. What are the sources of agency referrals?<br />
62
C. Is there a system for reporting back on referred clients?<br />
IIl. Coordination:<br />
Is the present interagency Coordination satisfactory? If<br />
A.<br />
what do you recommend?<br />
not,<br />
B. Do agencies exchange information and confidential records?<br />
C. Are there any interagency agreements?<br />
D. Are there any anticipated future interagency problems?<br />
If so, what do you recommend?<br />
Request any other recommendations, comments, gripes, etc.,<br />
IV.<br />
may be beneficial in providing better vocational re-<br />
which<br />
services to the handicapped individuals in your<br />
habilitation<br />
region/county.<br />
hatarrangements have been made for regional planning, on a<br />
V.<br />
basis, for services to disabled persons?<br />
continual
Name of Aency:<br />
2. Address of Agency:<br />
TASK FORCE ,II,I<br />
SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET<br />
SRVEY OF AGEN$IES AND ORq,ANIZATIO<br />
3. Structure of Agency (if percentage, indicate)<br />
Federal<br />
Mu{cip State<br />
lity<br />
a<br />
Local<br />
County<br />
Non-Profit<br />
Private<br />
4. Source of Referral:<br />
Physician<br />
Service<br />
Employment<br />
Welfare<br />
Institution<br />
Educational<br />
Association<br />
Health<br />
Individual<br />
Other<br />
5. Type of Service Provided:<br />
Service<br />
Medical<br />
Counseling<br />
As'itance<br />
Ffnancial<br />
Shelter<br />
Service<br />
Psychiatric<br />
Placement<br />
Research<br />
Other<br />
6. Cost to Client:<br />
None<br />
Ability to pay<br />
On<br />
fee<br />
Regular<br />
(explain<br />
Other<br />
64
7. Services Restricted<br />
Type of Disability<br />
Sex<br />
*If checked, please describe restrictions: i.e., Ages 10-16 only, etc.
TASK FORCE IV GUIDELINES<br />
VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND TECHNICAL CHANGES<br />
1-30-68<br />
the disabled individual frequently is at the fFinge of the job market<br />
Since<br />
terms of vocational skills and training, too many times he is among those<br />
in<br />
hired and first fired." The task force on vocational training and<br />
"last<br />
change has four primary objectives:<br />
technical<br />
To identify present training facilities<br />
i.<br />
To consider needs for new, improved, or expanded<br />
2.<br />
facilities<br />
training<br />
To determine what gaps exist in present vocational<br />
3.<br />
training<br />
To enumerate technical changes, which presently<br />
4.<br />
require job training or retraining.<br />
general, vocational training for the handicapped in industry is handled by<br />
In<br />
training, or formal apprenticeships for the skilled trades.<br />
on-the-job<br />
education programs are administered through the public school system,<br />
Special<br />
education for a variety of disabilities which include the blind,<br />
providing<br />
sighted, physically handicapped, neurologically impaired, deaf,<br />
partially<br />
retarded, those requiring speech and hearing therapy, and the emotionally<br />
mentally<br />
Work habits rather than job skills are stressed in secondary school<br />
disturbed.<br />
education programs.<br />
special<br />
the program for the education of the migrant worker is relatively new<br />
Although<br />
the curriculum of the publicschools, it is now receiving greatly increased<br />
in<br />
Is it recognized as one aspect of education in your local school<br />
attention.<br />
district?<br />
to rehabilitation and available to the handicapped in our area are<br />
Related<br />
programs for adults and out-of-school youth who attend classes on<br />
educational<br />
part-time basis. Special needs for full-time continuing education are met<br />
a<br />
public schools, vocational-technical schools, community colleges, business<br />
in<br />
and other colleges and universities. The Federal Manpower Development<br />
colleges<br />
Training Act offers retraining for those who are unemployed and for those<br />
and<br />
need upgrading and are capable of handling more than they are at the present<br />
who<br />
Training in basic education skills is also offered through MDTA. More<br />
time.<br />
40 different separate training programs are being provided directly through<br />
than<br />
funds. Studies of these services may indicate some areas where over-<br />
Federal<br />
lapping can be avoided.<br />
1965 literacy is being promoted through the Adult Basic Education program,<br />
Since<br />
adults are encouraged to complete high school through the Adult High School<br />
and<br />
Diploma program and the program for the Certificate of Educational Competence.<br />
66
TASK FORCE IV UESTIONNAIRE<br />
VOCATIONAL TRAINING AD TECICAL CHANCE<br />
order to accomplish the purposes of this study, it may be<br />
In<br />
to survey your community as to the numb#r and types of train-<br />
propriate<br />
ing. facilities available to the disabled.<br />
the facilities in your community presently providing vo-<br />
List<br />
training to the disabled and briefly describe the type<br />
cational<br />
of raining offered:<br />
What other present training facilities might be utilized for<br />
2.<br />
disabled?<br />
the
Which educational programs are being utilized? (check where<br />
3.<br />
appropriate)<br />
Adult Migrant Education SpeCial Education<br />
What disabling categories? (list)<br />
Are local labor unions participating in on-the-job training or<br />
4.<br />
for the disabled?<br />
apprenticeships<br />
If yes, which one, and in what ways?
What industries or businesses are presently providing on-the-<br />
job training to disabled persons?<br />
What others could be utilized?<br />
69
6. What technical changes will require'new training facilities?<br />
7. nat new training facilities will be needed?<br />
In what ways are the present training needs of your region be-<br />
8.<br />
met, and in what ways might they be improved?<br />
ing<br />
7O
9. rite your reeomendations for future training needs<br />
71
11/21/67<br />
WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
TASK FORCE V BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT OF THE HANDICAPPED<br />
Guidelines<br />
guidelines for surveying the barriers confronting the handicapped<br />
Suggested<br />
in his pursuit for developing his maximum potential.<br />
individual<br />
regulatory, architectural, financial, manpower, social, cultural, age,<br />
Consider<br />
awareness, barriers, and other deterrents that are prevelant in your<br />
public<br />
community.<br />
I. Regul.atory Barriers<br />
Restricted Services<br />
A.<br />
Age groups-<br />
i.<br />
Locality requirements<br />
2.<br />
Specific disabling categories<br />
5.<br />
Unrealistic physical standards<br />
4.<br />
Undue emphasis on immediate vocational objectives<br />
5.<br />
Appropriations effects on<br />
B.<br />
Manpower and recruiting<br />
1.<br />
Facilities and services<br />
2.<br />
Percent of handicapped population served<br />
S.<br />
Backlog awaiting service<br />
a.<br />
individuals unaware of vocational rehabilitation<br />
b.<br />
possibilities<br />
Recommend actions necessary to overcome, both present and<br />
C.<br />
II. Financial Barriers<br />
barriers that effect the rehabilitation processes<br />
future,<br />
your community<br />
in<br />
Sources of program support<br />
A.<br />
Private support<br />
1.<br />
a.<br />
endoents<br />
civic organizations<br />
b:<br />
contributed services<br />
c.<br />
Local<br />
2.<br />
city<br />
a.<br />
county<br />
b.<br />
State and federal<br />
S.<br />
adequacy of support<br />
a.<br />
special education in public schools<br />
b.<br />
Anticipated future fund requirements<br />
B.<br />
Sources<br />
1.<br />
Aount<br />
2.<br />
Procedures for procuring funds<br />
S.<br />
4. Support in poverty areas<br />
72
III. Public Awareness<br />
is generally recognized that the ±nterests of the local population<br />
It<br />
best served where there is sustained local interest and participa-<br />
are<br />
This is especially true of this statewide planning for compre-<br />
tion.<br />
vocational rehabilitation services for a11 handicapped Washing-<br />
hensive<br />
tonians.<br />
Public awareness programs should set A. orth"<br />
Size and nature of the disabled population<br />
1.<br />
Needs of the handicapped<br />
2.<br />
Contribution to local, state and national economy<br />
3.<br />
Numbers presently utilizing vocational rehabilitation services<br />
4.<br />
Emphasize responsibility community has for care of its own<br />
5.<br />
Commission's Public Information Program should:<br />
B.<br />
Incorporate the use of all news media for creating a public<br />
i.<br />
of the Statewide Planning Project and its purpose.<br />
awareness<br />
Publicize the task forcefunctions and areas of responsi-<br />
2.<br />
bility.<br />
Enlist the aid of all professional organizations in defining the<br />
C.<br />
Project and its purpose to professionals in all allied fields.<br />
Study and recommend a system of public information and public<br />
D.<br />
programs to inform the general public on:<br />
relations<br />
Basic knowledge of the handicapped and disabled<br />
1.<br />
Referral information<br />
2.<br />
Available vocational rehabilitation facilities and services<br />
3.<br />
Needed vocational rehabilitation facilities and services<br />
4.<br />
IV. Architectural and Design Barriers<br />
Identify present physical barriers of the handicapped individual.<br />
A.<br />
should include his entire environment; home, training area,<br />
This<br />
place of employment, transportation, transient facilities,<br />
.workshop,<br />
area, etc.<br />
recreational<br />
Recommend procedures and methods to mitigate or eliminate all<br />
B.<br />
barriers<br />
existing<br />
Recommend specific design characteristics and features to be<br />
C.<br />
in future facilities and equipment which will be or<br />
considered<br />
may be utilized by the handicapped.<br />
73
questionnaire is provided for optional use in conjunction with<br />
This<br />
Task Force V Guidelines. It. is not intended to be comprehensive or<br />
the<br />
but merely a beginning for the task force members to pur-<br />
all-inclusive<br />
and study in depth those areas of interest to the local community.<br />
sue<br />
Financial and Legislative<br />
methods of financing services for vocational rehabilita-<br />
What<br />
programs are currently in use in your community?<br />
tion<br />
a.. 1r state government<br />
b. by city and county government<br />
c. by non-profit agencies<br />
d. by private agencies<br />
e. y federal government<br />
f. by others
What anunts of money have been spent for operation of vocational<br />
2.<br />
services and facilities in your area?<br />
rehabilitation<br />
a. this year<br />
b. last year<br />
c. ten years ago<br />
What has been done; what is being' done now; and what should be<br />
3.<br />
about applying for federal grants-in-aid to help provide<br />
done<br />
rehabilitation services for the handicapped in your<br />
vocational<br />
region?<br />
4. Recommendations<br />
Public Awareness<br />
to change, expand, or rescind current legislation to im-<br />
a.<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation srvices to the handi-<br />
prove<br />
capped<br />
to initiate new legislation for correcting current defici-<br />
b.<br />
and providing adequate services in anticipation of<br />
encies<br />
future needs<br />
What are the key local organizations and agencies which have<br />
I.<br />
most interested, and helpful, in VR programs?<br />
been
ho are the key individuals in the community who can or should<br />
2.<br />
expected to take the lead in securing local action on be-<br />
be<br />
half of Vocational Rehabilitation?<br />
nat officers and administrative units of city and oo'ty gov-<br />
3.<br />
can be counted on for help in sscuring local support?<br />
e.ent<br />
hat is being done in your region/countyto increase public<br />
4.<br />
and information about VR services to secure public<br />
awareness<br />
for improving services and facilities; and to encour-<br />
support<br />
individual use of these services and facilities when<br />
age<br />
needed and available?<br />
hat are the best methods to .use in carrying out the public<br />
5.<br />
objective in your region? County? Community?<br />
awareness<br />
a.<br />
public meetings<br />
open houses at VR facilities<br />
b.<br />
speeches to local clubs, or groups<br />
c.<br />
printed leaflets<br />
d.<br />
newspapers<br />
e.<br />
radio and T spots or programs<br />
f.<br />
other<br />
g.<br />
76
CHAPTER V<br />
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
Estimates of the Prevalence and lnc±dence of HandieappedPersons<br />
principal concern of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />
One<br />
Rehabilitation was the determination of the number and kind<br />
tional<br />
disabled persons in the State of Washington. The determination<br />
of<br />
incidence of vocational disability was necessary in order to<br />
of<br />
the correlation between the disabled and the services<br />
establish<br />
to them and to plan for adequate future services.<br />
available<br />
THE COISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />
the Department of Planning and Community Affairs (or<br />
That<br />
successor agency) in cooperation with the Division of<br />
its<br />
Rehabilitation, the Departments of Health,<br />
Vocational<br />
Public Assistance and Employment Security,<br />
Institutions,<br />
and the Regional Medical Program:<br />
expand studies to identify thehandicapped in<br />
1.<br />
state;<br />
the<br />
study private and voluntary organizations as<br />
2.<br />
as state organizations which provide<br />
well<br />
services to these handicapped;<br />
determine the number of disabled who seek<br />
3.<br />
who are rejected for these services;<br />
services<br />
and<br />
recommend the allocation of staff to serve fully<br />
4.<br />
disabled people.<br />
all<br />
is defined as the total number of handicapped<br />
Prevalence<br />
in the State of Washington at a given point in time. Inci-<br />
people<br />
is defined as the number who become handicapped during a one<br />
dence<br />
period.<br />
year<br />
methods involved included the assignment of a.task<br />
The<br />
in each regional committee of the state. .Of all the task<br />
force<br />
these encountered the greatest problems. In the summer<br />
forces,<br />
1968 a conference of task force leaders was held, plus staff<br />
of<br />
of the State Planning and Community Affairs Agency, the<br />
members<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation, university staff members<br />
Division<br />
77
staff members of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehab-<br />
and<br />
Two graduate students at the University of Washington in<br />
ilitation.<br />
Counseling were employed for two months each in 1968<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
do esearch in this field.<br />
to<br />
studies were considered. Two'reports were parti-<br />
National<br />
helpful. The two most influential were CHRONIC CONDITIONS<br />
cularly<br />
ACTIVITY LIMITATION, UNITED STATES,. July 1961-June 1963, National<br />
AND<br />
for Health Statistics, Series I0, No. 17, U. S. Department of<br />
Center<br />
Education and Welfare, Public Health Services, May 1965,<br />
Health,<br />
D.C.; and DISABILITY WORK AND INCOME MAINTENANCE: PRE-<br />
Washington,<br />
OF DISABILITY, 1966, Lawrence W. Haber, Social Scurity<br />
VALENCE<br />
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social<br />
Bulletin,<br />
Security Administration, May 1968.<br />
addition, the final reports of the statewide planning<br />
In<br />
from many of the other states were studied to gather relevant<br />
studies<br />
The Commission would like to acknowledge particularly the help.<br />
data.<br />
has come from the Final Report of the State of Wisconsin,<br />
that<br />
Sather, Ph.D., Project Administrator, and the Final Report,<br />
William<br />
Planning for Vocational Rehabilitation Services,<br />
ComprehensiveStatewide<br />
of Ohio, David Tait, Ed.D., Research Director. The major help<br />
State<br />
Jerald Forster, Ph.D., Professor of Rehabilitation Counseling,<br />
of<br />
of Washington, who served as Task Force I Chairman in the<br />
University<br />
area; and Donald R. Johns, Ph.D., Assistant Supervisor of<br />
Seattle<br />
State of Washington, Department of Institutions, who was<br />
Planning,<br />
of Task Force I in the South Puget Sound Region, is acknowl-<br />
Chairman<br />
Dr. Johns discussed the study on the prevalence of disability<br />
edged.<br />
several occasions. Dr. Forster was the supervisor of two graduate<br />
on<br />
at the University of Washington, Miss Andrea Ayers and Mr.<br />
students<br />
Lurie, who gathered data on the prevalence of disability. Mr.<br />
Joseph<br />
W. Walker, Supervisor of the Population and Research Division<br />
John<br />
the Planning and Community AffairsAgency, State of Washington,<br />
of<br />
the documents of his agency on population and also partici-<br />
shared<br />
in the conference held in 1968 on the prevalence of disability.<br />
pated<br />
summary, it is estimated that the incidence of potential<br />
In<br />
to Vocational Rehabilitation in the year 1975 is 37,500.<br />
referrals<br />
number of people, 37,500, would be expected to request Vocational<br />
This<br />
services in 1975 and be both eligible and feasible<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
these services. This many people should be rehabilitated, in 1975.<br />
for<br />
is expected that this would involve at least a ten-fold increase<br />
It<br />
staff and case service monies. The combination of service agencies<br />
in<br />
have a synergistic effect, providing better services at lower<br />
should<br />
However, the increasing costs to the more severely disabled<br />
costs.<br />
have the effect of increasing costs.<br />
will<br />
78
37,500<br />
feasible and interested potential new<br />
Eligible,<br />
clients of Vocational Rehabilitation in the year 1975<br />
12,500<br />
disabled<br />
Physically<br />
people<br />
of total clients<br />
1/3<br />
25,000<br />
ill, alcoholics, mental<br />
Mentally<br />
public offenders,<br />
retardates,<br />
disadvantaged<br />
socially<br />
2/3 of total clients<br />
have, however, taken the position that rehabilitation<br />
We<br />
the long run pays rather than costs. To the degree that the<br />
in<br />
people can be made self-supporting, society is benefited.<br />
handicapped<br />
benefit to society is both short-range and long-range.<br />
This<br />
are many complicating factors in trying to anticipate<br />
There<br />
number of handicapped individuals in Washington State in the year<br />
the<br />
Our government is even now deploying weapons for atomic war-<br />
1975.<br />
If we have this kind of war, how many handicapped people will<br />
fare.<br />
be left in the United States: one million, fifty million, or none?<br />
State has an exceptionally high level of income.<br />
Washington<br />
in recent years according to figures of the Employment Secu-<br />
However,<br />
Department of Washington State, this state has had approximately<br />
rity<br />
percent more unemployed people than has the nation as a whole.<br />
one<br />
marginal person who is unemployed in another state tends to be<br />
The<br />
to areas with high employment and high wages, irrespective of<br />
drawn<br />
the actual employment which might be offered him.<br />
1968 amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act<br />
The<br />
Considerably the eligibility criteria for vocational rehab-<br />
widened<br />
services. Not only are family members of handicapped persons<br />
ilitation<br />
eligible for services, but the socially disadvantaged also were<br />
now<br />
eligible. The poor have more handicaps than those who have<br />
made<br />
Public Assistance cases have more disabilities than the rest<br />
money.<br />
the population. The Public Assistance roll has been kept down in<br />
of<br />
because of the residence requirement. It is postulated that if<br />
part<br />
requirement were eliminated, there would be an influx of recip-<br />
this<br />
from other states, people drawn to the high Public Assistance<br />
ients<br />
in this state. This is already happening in some states. In<br />
grants<br />
week 50,000 new Public Assistance recipients were added to the<br />
one<br />
in New York City, alone. Washington State, too, might see an<br />
roll<br />
of recipients from less generous Western states since the test<br />
influx<br />
court case knocks out the residence requirement for Public Assistance.<br />
solutions have been advanced to meet this problem.<br />
Several<br />
is the suggestion of Governor Nelson Rockefeller of New York that<br />
One<br />
Public Assistance be made a nationwide, Federally supported effort.<br />
79.
second suggestion is that of the economic advisor to U.S. Senator<br />
A<br />
Goldwater, Milton Friedman, a professor of Economics at the<br />
Barry<br />
of Chicago, that there be a negative income tax. What-<br />
University<br />
the solution, it is assumed that the existing Public Assistance<br />
ever<br />
will get worse before it gets better. There is a crisis<br />
situation<br />
welfare services in the United States, and in'Washington State.<br />
in<br />
reasoned estimate of services for this population seems to<br />
Every<br />
low.<br />
prove<br />
of the following material is adapted from the Final<br />
Much<br />
Comprehensive Statewide Planning for Vocational Rehabili-<br />
Report<br />
Services Wisconsin, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />
tation<br />
Sather, Ph.D., Project Administrator, 1968.<br />
William<br />
Estimates of Vocational Rehabilitation Need<br />
this section information from various sources will be<br />
In<br />
in order to estimate the total number of handicapped in-<br />
analyzed<br />
in Washington who should receive Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
dividuals<br />
during the 1975 fiscal.year. The year 1975 is the one in<br />
services<br />
the expansion of Vocational Rehabilitation programs and ser-<br />
which<br />
should reach a point of saturation so that all handicapped<br />
vices<br />
persons in need will be served.<br />
need for vocational rehabilitation services may be<br />
The<br />
by professional judgment, but the various levels of<br />
determined<br />
for service are directly related to the motivation of handi-<br />
demand<br />
persons. A basic goal for Vocational Rehabilitation, in<br />
capped<br />
with other agencies, is not only to reach all eligible<br />
cooperation<br />
persons to inform them of vocational rehabilitation ser-<br />
handicapped<br />
available, but to motivate them to accept needed services.<br />
vices<br />
point of saturation is reached when the backlog of clients has<br />
The<br />
served and the lowest practical level of demand for services<br />
been<br />
been filled. In order to reach this lowest practical level it<br />
has<br />
be necessary to contact large numbers of handicapped persons,<br />
will<br />
of whom will prove to be infeasible for service because they<br />
many<br />
too poorly motivated. On the other hand, procedures should be<br />
are<br />
to continuously increase the proportion of clients con-<br />
developed<br />
who can be successfully motivated. Public information on<br />
tacted<br />
rehabilitation is a recognized need. Widespread publicity,<br />
vocational<br />
for a program unable to meet the demands made upon it, does<br />
however,<br />
to improve the program image. (See Administrative Aspects,<br />
little<br />
Public Relations, page 208.)<br />
technical definition of clients served by Vocational<br />
A<br />
is the total number who appear on the agency caseload<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
a given year regardless of whether they were carried over<br />
during<br />
the previous year, referred and/or accepted for service during<br />
from<br />
year, closed rehabilitated or not rehabilitated .during the year<br />
the<br />
carried over to the next year.<br />
or<br />
80
of numbers of clients who should be served in<br />
Estimates<br />
are made for the following target populations: Persons who<br />
1975<br />
a disability which is a vocational handicap, including the so-<br />
have<br />
disadvantaged, mentally ill, alcoholics, mental retardates<br />
cially<br />
public offenders. The basic methodology employed in arriving<br />
and<br />
estimates for the group follows:<br />
at<br />
of an estimate of the revlence of persons<br />
Establishment<br />
employable ase (or some more appropriate ase range)_ who should at<br />
of<br />
time be referred for vocational rehabilitation services. Preva-<br />
some<br />
is defined as the total number of handicapped persons in a tar-<br />
lence<br />
group in the State of Washington at a given point in time, e.g.,<br />
get<br />
1975.<br />
of an estimate of number of persons of employ-<br />
Derivation<br />
age who should be referred for vocational rehabilitation during<br />
able<br />
one-Yea p.e.riod (i.e., 1975.) This is related to the incidence of<br />
a<br />
handicapped persons, i.e., the number who become handi-<br />
vocationally<br />
capped during a one-year period.<br />
of the Vocational Rehabilitation caseload indicates<br />
Analysis<br />
there is a significant proportion of clients in each target group<br />
that<br />
in a given year who had been served by Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
served<br />
or more times previously. This is because some clients who have<br />
one<br />
rehabilitated are found to be in need of services again. These<br />
been<br />
are reopened so that additional services can be provided. Some<br />
cases<br />
groups such as alcoholics and the mentally ill may be less<br />
target<br />
resulting in greater proportions requiring services more than<br />
stable,<br />
once.<br />
in future years more emphasis will be placed<br />
Furthermore,<br />
selective follow-up of closed cases so that the proportion of closed<br />
on<br />
that are reopened will increase. The estimates of the numbers<br />
cases<br />
to be served in each target group in 1975 will be conserva-<br />
of.clients<br />
if the clients who are.to be served more than once are not taken<br />
tive<br />
account. Therefore, an allowance of about 20 to 25 percent should<br />
into<br />
be added to the estimate of the number to be served.<br />
these figures would be exaggerated if consideration were<br />
Yet<br />
given to duplication of count. The estimates of the numbers of<br />
not<br />
to be served in each target group have been arrived at inde-<br />
persons<br />
without taking into account the number of potentialclients<br />
pendently<br />
can be assigned to two or more target groups. For example, there<br />
who<br />
some mentally ill individuals who are also mentally retarded.<br />
are<br />
extent to which the estimates of numbers to be served in each<br />
The<br />
group are inflated because of this resulting duplication of<br />
target<br />
cannot be determined with accuracy until more research is done.<br />
count<br />
this time, it is therefore assumed that the inflating and deflating<br />
At<br />
factors described above offset each other.<br />
81
indicated, the point of saturation in program develop-<br />
As<br />
will be reached when the entire backlog of handicapped persons<br />
ment<br />
need has been served. As vocational rehabilitation programs ex-<br />
in<br />
a part of this backlog will be served each year through 1975.<br />
pand,<br />
order to maintain this level of saturation each year beyond 1975,<br />
In<br />
number of clients who are brought into the caseload each year<br />
the<br />
be about equal to the number who are closed either rehabili-<br />
should<br />
or not rehabilitated. The flow chart of service statistics<br />
tated<br />
the five-year period 1964-1968 shows this has not been the case<br />
for<br />
the Washington Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
for<br />
are factors which may result in continuing program<br />
There<br />
beyond 1975 such as:<br />
expansion<br />
increase in the general population resulting<br />
continued<br />
proportionate increase in the handicapped popula-<br />
in<br />
tion;<br />
eligibility criteria so that greater pro-<br />
broadened<br />
of the handicapped population may legally<br />
portions<br />
be served;<br />
vocational rehabilitation techniques resulting<br />
improved<br />
the extension of services to many who previously<br />
in<br />
would not have been served.<br />
procedures for estimating vocational rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
and the estimates themselves, are presented below.<br />
need<br />
The Physically Disabled<br />
National Center for Health Statistics published a re-<br />
The<br />
(1965) port 1 presented characteristics of persons with limita-<br />
which<br />
of activity due to chronic disease or impairment. These degrees<br />
tion<br />
limitation wer.e:<br />
of<br />
to carry on major activity (housework,<br />
unable<br />
employment)<br />
school,<br />
in amountor kind of major activity<br />
limited<br />
limited in major activity<br />
not<br />
Chronic Conditions and Activity Limitation, United States, July<br />
i.<br />
1963. National Center for Health Stat%stics-Series i0<br />
1961-June<br />
17, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public<br />
No.<br />
Services, May 1965, Washington, D. C.<br />
Health<br />
82
1964<br />
_FY<br />
INTAKE<br />
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, STATE OF WASHINGTON<br />
GROSS CASELOADS, SHOWING INPUT, OUTPUT, AND CARRYOVER<br />
Five Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 1968<br />
GROSS '<br />
LOAD<br />
L6,5.27- .I 12,816<br />
1965.<br />
__FY<br />
INTAKE<br />
1966<br />
FY<br />
NAKE<br />
6,687<br />
FY_1967<br />
INTAKE<br />
7,528<br />
1968<br />
_F.<br />
INTAKE<br />
11,428<br />
15,330 NON-REHAB<br />
CARRYOVER"<br />
6,289<br />
CARRYOVER<br />
7,707<br />
CARRYOVER<br />
8,643<br />
CLO En<br />
REHAB<br />
1,355<br />
./<br />
3,754<br />
REHAB<br />
/ 1,478<br />
CLOSED t,<br />
-<br />
REHAB<br />
/ 1,564<br />
CLOSED<br />
LOAD<br />
GROSS<br />
20,045<br />
8,114<br />
CARRYOVER<br />
8,617<br />
CARRYOVER<br />
12,093<br />
to FY 69<br />
[ 2,000 cases 83<br />
'1<br />
CLOSED<br />
7,025<br />
5,652<br />
REHAB<br />
/1,957<br />
5,068<br />
NON-REHAB<br />
REHAB<br />
1,855<br />
NON-REHAB<br />
6,097<br />
gross load is the sum<br />
*The<br />
closures and carryover<br />
of<br />
the year; it is alsothe<br />
for<br />
of intake for the year<br />
sum<br />
plus carryover from prior year.
with mental or nervous conditions accounted for 7.7 percent<br />
Persons<br />
the number in the survey sample. The sample included very few<br />
of<br />
retarded or alcoholics. It included only those who were<br />
mentally<br />
institutionalized and whose ages ranged from 17 through 64.<br />
not<br />
was estimated from the survey findings that 8,633,000 persons<br />
It<br />
the United States had one or more chronic conditions with limi-<br />
in<br />
in the amount or kind of major activity that could be per-<br />
tation<br />
or inability to carry on major activity. This total less<br />
formed<br />
percent amounts to 7,968,259. Percent distribution by dis-<br />
7.7<br />
age and race is presented in the adjoining table.<br />
ability,<br />
more recent survey of the prevalence of disability and<br />
A<br />
economic impact was undertaken by the Social Security Adminis-<br />
its<br />
in 1966 and a summary of the survey findings was reported<br />
tration<br />
Haber (1968) 1.<br />
by<br />
survey work was carried out for the Social Security<br />
The<br />
by the Bureau of the Census. The nationwide survey<br />
Administration<br />
a sample of all non-institutionalized persons aged 18<br />
included<br />
64. The data were based on self-evaluation of work limita-<br />
through<br />
tions as in the National HealthSurvey previously.cited..<br />
in the Social Security Survey was defined as a<br />
Disability<br />
in thekind or amount of work (or housework)that could be<br />
limitation<br />
which resulted from a chronic condition or impairment last-<br />
performed<br />
three months or longer. The extent of incapacity ranged from<br />
ing<br />
to perform any kind of.Work to secondary limitations in<br />
inability<br />
amount or kind of work performed. Data on employment and func-<br />
the<br />
capacities were collected to further evaluate the nature and<br />
tional<br />
of disability.<br />
severity<br />
to this survey, 17.8 million non-institutional-<br />
According<br />
adults aged 18-64 were limited in ability to work because of<br />
ized<br />
chronic condition for a period of six months or longer. In<br />
some<br />
to reduce the uncertainty of prognosisduring the early stages<br />
order<br />
the disability, the data were presented only for persons disabled<br />
of<br />
than six months (an additional 400,000 had been disabled three<br />
more<br />
months or more).<br />
estimated prevalence of disability reported was twice<br />
The<br />
high as that reported by the National Center for Health Statistics<br />
as<br />
(17.8 million versus 8,633,000).<br />
Disability<br />
io<br />
and Income Maintenance: Prevalence Disabilit_ff.<br />
Work<br />
Lawrence W. Haber, Social Security Bulletin U. S. Department<br />
1966.<br />
Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration,<br />
of<br />
1968.<br />
May,<br />
84
number and percent distribution of persons with limitation of activity, by selected chronic conditions<br />
Average<br />
limitation according to degree of limitation: United States, July 1963-June 1965<br />
causing<br />
based household interviews of the civili,,n, noninstitutiona! population. The survey design, general qualifications, and information the reliability ofte estimates<br />
[Dta<br />
in ppendix 1. Definitions of terms given in Appendix Ill<br />
given<br />
chronic<br />
Selected<br />
conditions<br />
limited in<br />
Persons<br />
activity<br />
All<br />
With<br />
limitation,<br />
degrees<br />
ac- but<br />
of<br />
in<br />
tlvlty<br />
not<br />
limitation<br />
Average<br />
major<br />
actlvltyl<br />
22,583 6,114<br />
all forms--- 148 31<br />
tuberculosis,<br />
neoplasms 260 35<br />
alignant<br />
and unspecified<br />
Benign<br />
227 60<br />
neoplasms<br />
fever 1,152 415<br />
ksthma-hay<br />
571 122<br />
Diabetes<br />
and<br />
ental<br />
1,767 429<br />
conditions<br />
conditions 3,619 652<br />
Heart<br />
without heart<br />
Hypertension<br />
1,369 314<br />
involvement<br />
veins 535 161<br />
aricose<br />
243 54<br />
Hemorrhoids<br />
conditions of<br />
Dther<br />
system 758 176<br />
circulatory<br />
sinusitis and<br />
3hronic<br />
621 204<br />
bronchitis<br />
conditions of<br />
Dther<br />
system 501 87<br />
respiratory<br />
ulcer 550 123<br />
Peptic<br />
556 91<br />
Hernia<br />
conditions Of<br />
)ther<br />
system 958 206<br />
digestive<br />
of genito-<br />
3onditlons<br />
system 1,071 304<br />
urinary<br />
and rheumatism-- 3,481 725<br />
Erthritis<br />
diseases of muscles,<br />
3ther<br />
and jointsm 785 234<br />
bones,<br />
impairments 1,285 184<br />
Fisual<br />
impairments 461 97<br />
earing<br />
complete<br />
Paralysis,<br />
923 .118<br />
partial<br />
(except<br />
Impairments<br />
of back<br />
paralysis)<br />
1,769 469<br />
spine<br />
(except pa-<br />
Impairments<br />
and absence) of<br />
ralysis<br />
extremities and<br />
upper<br />
401 92<br />
shoulders<br />
(except pa-<br />
Impairments<br />
and absence) of<br />
ralysis<br />
extremities and<br />
lower<br />
1,325 384<br />
hips<br />
With<br />
limitation<br />
amount<br />
in<br />
kind<br />
or<br />
major<br />
of<br />
activity<br />
to<br />
.Unable<br />
carry<br />
actlvity<br />
number of persons in thousands<br />
12,347<br />
74<br />
iii<br />
127<br />
543<br />
291<br />
923<br />
1,941<br />
836<br />
313<br />
148<br />
371<br />
304<br />
233<br />
313<br />
363<br />
534<br />
562<br />
2,076<br />
466<br />
618<br />
219<br />
361<br />
1,139<br />
258<br />
704<br />
4,122<br />
All<br />
degrees<br />
ac- of<br />
tivity<br />
limitation<br />
i00,0<br />
With<br />
li[tation,<br />
not in<br />
but<br />
or maJ<br />
activity<br />
With<br />
limitation<br />
amount<br />
in<br />
kind<br />
or<br />
major<br />
of<br />
activity<br />
Percent distribution<br />
i00.0<br />
0.7 0,5<br />
44<br />
I. 2 O. 6<br />
114<br />
1.0 1.0<br />
40<br />
5.1 6,8<br />
194<br />
158 2.5 2.0<br />
7.8 7.0<br />
415<br />
16.0 10.7<br />
1,026<br />
6.1 '5.1<br />
219<br />
2,4 2.6<br />
61<br />
41 i,i 0.9<br />
212 3.4 2.9<br />
112 2.7 3.3<br />
2.2 1.4<br />
181<br />
2.4 2.0<br />
114<br />
102 2.5 1.5<br />
218 4.2 3.4<br />
4.7 5.0<br />
205<br />
15.4 11.9<br />
680<br />
3.5 3.8<br />
86<br />
5.7 3.0<br />
483<br />
145 2.0 1.6<br />
444 4.1 1.9<br />
160 7.8 7.7<br />
51 1,8 1.5<br />
237 5.9 6.3<br />
activity refers to ability to work, keep house, or engage in school preschool activities.<br />
iMajor<br />
Of conditions causing limitation may be greater than the number of persons limited because person<br />
Summations<br />
i00.0<br />
0.6<br />
0.9<br />
1.0<br />
4,4<br />
2.4<br />
7.5<br />
15.7<br />
6.8<br />
2,5<br />
1.2<br />
3.0<br />
2.5<br />
1.9<br />
2.5<br />
2.9<br />
4.3<br />
4.6<br />
16.8<br />
3.8<br />
5,0<br />
1.8<br />
2.9<br />
9.2<br />
2.1<br />
5.7<br />
tc<br />
Unable<br />
carry<br />
major<br />
actlvity<br />
than one condition cause of his limitation; the other hand, they may be less because only selected<br />
report<br />
are shown.<br />
conditions<br />
may add to more than I00 because person can report more than condition cause of his limita-<br />
SPercentages<br />
the other hand, they may add to less than i00 because only selected conditions shown.<br />
tion;<br />
Conditions 9g Activity Limitation--Un___it__e_d States, uly 1963<br />
Chronic<br />
1965. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and elfare, Public<br />
une<br />
Health Service, 1969.<br />
85<br />
IO0.C<br />
i.I<br />
2.8<br />
1.0<br />
4,7<br />
3.8<br />
i0.i<br />
24.9<br />
5.3<br />
1,5<br />
1.0<br />
5.1<br />
2,7<br />
4.4<br />
2.8<br />
2.5<br />
5.3<br />
5.0<br />
16.5<br />
2.1<br />
11.7<br />
3.5<br />
10.8<br />
3.9<br />
1.2<br />
5.7
difference is attributed largely to differences in<br />
The<br />
for indentification rather than criteria for defining dis-<br />
procedures<br />
The disability criteria in the 1966 study differ only in<br />
ability.<br />
to women. The 1966 survey included housework as well as<br />
reference<br />
limitations regardless of present activity or status since it<br />
work<br />
plausible that many disabled women were prevented from entering<br />
was<br />
labor force due to limitation of activity. The National Health<br />
the<br />
(conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics) did<br />
Survey<br />
not take this into account.<br />
the National Health Survey, only those who reported a<br />
In<br />
condition of impairment were asked the questions relating<br />
chronic<br />
disability. Many individuals will report symptoms of disability<br />
to<br />
actually reporting at the outset that they have a disability.<br />
without<br />
in the Social Security Survey was such as to take this<br />
Methodology<br />
into account.<br />
factor<br />
1966 survey was conducted with other changes in meth-<br />
The<br />
The most significant was the use of simple questionnaires<br />
odology.<br />
through the mail to initially identify disabled persons as op-<br />
sent<br />
to the more complicated multiple choice interview schedules<br />
posed<br />
in the National Health Survey, The mail questionnaires were<br />
used<br />
to screen a large sample. The nature, severity and extent of<br />
used<br />
were later verified and refined during an extensive per-<br />
disability<br />
interview with the disabled adult.<br />
sonal<br />
Social Security Survey findings are presented in the<br />
Major<br />
adjoining.<br />
table<br />
Social Security Survey report did not include any break-<br />
The<br />
by disabling condition. However, it is inferred that very few<br />
down<br />
and mentally retarded were included in this survey either<br />
alcoholics<br />
the definition of disability in both surveys was essentially<br />
since<br />
the same.<br />
the National Health Survey as indicated, 7.7 percent of<br />
In<br />
respondents reported nervous or mental condit.ions. The method-<br />
the<br />
utilized in the Social Security Survey probably resulted in<br />
ology<br />
identification of a greater proportion of persons with mental or<br />
the<br />
conditions. In this survey, ii percent of the respondents<br />
nervous<br />
a nervous or mental condition. If Ii percent is subtracted<br />
reported<br />
the Social Security Survey estimate, then this nationwide esti-<br />
from<br />
of physically disabled persons becomes 15,842,000.<br />
mate<br />
is little difference between men and women in the<br />
There<br />
of disability, but among older persons more women than<br />
prevalence<br />
believed that their health prevented them from working. The<br />
men<br />
of occupations is more limited for women and they have less<br />
range<br />
experience and are, therefore, less likely to secure employment.<br />
work<br />
because of family responsibilities and social expectations, are<br />
Men,<br />
more motivated to return to work and make a vocational adjustment.
force and work status by severity of disability and sex: Percentage distribution of<br />
Labor<br />
population aged 18-64 by labor force status, spring 1966<br />
noninstitutlonal<br />
force and<br />
Labor<br />
status<br />
work<br />
TOTAL<br />
(in thou-<br />
Number<br />
sands)<br />
Total percent 4--/.<br />
in labor force<br />
Not<br />
labor force 4.!<br />
In<br />
Employed<br />
time<br />
Full<br />
time<br />
Part<br />
Unemloyed<br />
MEN<br />
(in thou-<br />
Number<br />
sands)<br />
Total percent 4../<br />
in labor force<br />
Not<br />
labor force /<br />
In<br />
Employed.<br />
time<br />
Full<br />
time<br />
Part<br />
Unemployed.<br />
WOMEN<br />
(in thou-<br />
Number<br />
sands)<br />
Total percent 4--/<br />
in labor force<br />
Not<br />
labor force /<br />
In<br />
Employed<br />
time<br />
Full<br />
time<br />
Part<br />
Unemployed<br />
popu-<br />
U.S.<br />
/<br />
lation<br />
(in<br />
thousands)<br />
103,085<br />
I00.0<br />
33.2<br />
66.8<br />
64.4<br />
(51)<br />
(3?)<br />
2.5<br />
48,982<br />
I00,0<br />
9.5<br />
90.5<br />
87.4<br />
(2/)<br />
(S_l)<br />
54,103<br />
I00.0<br />
54.6<br />
45.4<br />
43.5<br />
(21)<br />
(2/)<br />
1.9<br />
Nondls-<br />
/ abled<br />
85,332<br />
I00.0<br />
30.2<br />
69.9<br />
67.8<br />
(51)<br />
(2/)<br />
2.2<br />
40,552<br />
I00.0<br />
6.1<br />
94.0<br />
91.4<br />
(21)<br />
(5/)<br />
2.7<br />
44'779<br />
I00.0<br />
52.0<br />
48.1<br />
46.4<br />
(51)<br />
1.7<br />
Severity of disability 3/<br />
Occupao<br />
Total<br />
Severetlonal<br />
disabled<br />
17,753<br />
I00.0<br />
47.4<br />
52.1<br />
48.0<br />
36.2<br />
11.7<br />
3.9<br />
8,430<br />
I00.0<br />
25.8<br />
73.7<br />
68.3<br />
57.7<br />
10.6<br />
5.2<br />
9,324<br />
I00.0<br />
66.9<br />
32.6<br />
29.6<br />
16.8<br />
12.8<br />
2.9<br />
6,100<br />
I00.0<br />
80.0<br />
19.2<br />
16.3<br />
1.7<br />
14.5<br />
2.9<br />
2,300<br />
I00.0<br />
72.3<br />
26.7<br />
.7 21<br />
4.1<br />
17.6<br />
5.0<br />
3,800<br />
I00.0<br />
84.7<br />
14.7<br />
13.0<br />
.3<br />
12.6<br />
1.6<br />
5,014<br />
I00.0<br />
34.9<br />
65.1<br />
59.4<br />
43.2<br />
16.2<br />
5.3<br />
2,420<br />
I00.0<br />
4.9<br />
! 95.<br />
87.7<br />
72.3<br />
15.4<br />
6.7<br />
2,594<br />
I00.0<br />
62.8<br />
37.2<br />
33.0<br />
16.0<br />
17.0<br />
3.9<br />
Secondary<br />
work<br />
limits<br />
lion<br />
Data from speclal tabulation of Current Population Survey March 1966, U.S. Bureau of the Census.<br />
I/<br />
Includes adults disabled 6 months or less, obtained by subtracting total disabled lonser than 6<br />
/<br />
from the civilian nonlnstitutlonal population aged 18-64.<br />
months<br />
Disabled longer than 6 months.<br />
3/<br />
Includes less than I percent of the dlsabled adults not reporting labor force or work status.<br />
4/<br />
Data for ages 18-64 not available.<br />
5/<br />
Security pr_v_.@y o_f the Disabled: 196_.__6. U.S. Department of Health,<br />
Soci_____a<br />
and Welfarel Social Security Administration, n.d.<br />
Education,<br />
87<br />
6,639<br />
I00.0<br />
26.9<br />
72.6<br />
68.5<br />
62.7<br />
5.8<br />
3,9<br />
3,710<br />
I00.0<br />
10.6<br />
88.9<br />
84.6<br />
81.5<br />
3.1<br />
4.2<br />
2,930<br />
I00.0<br />
47.6<br />
51.9<br />
48.1<br />
38.9<br />
9.3<br />
3.5
of the severity of disability,the disabled had<br />
Regardless<br />
rates of unemployment than the non-disabled.<br />
higher<br />
unemployment rate of disabled men was twice that of<br />
The<br />
men. More than one-fourth of the severely disabled men<br />
non-disabled<br />
in the labor force, but only four percent were employed full-<br />
were<br />
About nine-tenths of the partially disablSd men were in the<br />
time.<br />
force. Disabled women had lower rates of labor force involve-<br />
labor<br />
ment.<br />
table presents an estimate of prevalence for each of<br />
The<br />
sub-groups of the entire population of handicapped individuals.<br />
three<br />
may be argued that all individuals in each group are potential<br />
It<br />
for vocational rehabilitation services regardless of<br />
referrals<br />
of handicap or employment status. Yet, based on Vocational<br />
severity<br />
program experience, it is evident that some handicapped<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
should be screened and not considered for referral because<br />
persons<br />
handicaps are either too severe or too slight for them to bene-<br />
their<br />
fit from services.<br />
information is available at this time which can be used<br />
No<br />
making precise statements ofthe proportions of handicapped persons<br />
in<br />
should at some time be referred for vocational rehabilitation ser-<br />
who<br />
In the absence of such information, it is useful to make tenta-<br />
vices.<br />
but conservative, estimates of these proportions based on state-<br />
tive,<br />
of rationale.<br />
ments<br />
severely disabled population in the Social Security<br />
The<br />
included some who were obviously inappropriate for referral<br />
Survey<br />
any time, because they were too severely handicapped. Yet this<br />
al<br />
is probably small sinceVocational Rheabilitation has,<br />
proportion<br />
fact, been accepting many severelyhandicapped persons for service<br />
in<br />
has been successful in placing them in employment. Furthermore,<br />
and<br />
who were too severely handicapped would at some later time be<br />
some<br />
for referral for various reasons including diminution in<br />
appropriate<br />
of handicap over time and application of improved techniques<br />
severity<br />
rehabilitation. Since the proportion of potential referrals is<br />
of<br />
than i00 percent, but obviously much greater than 50 percent it<br />
less<br />
therefore, conservatively estimated that 75 percent of this popu-<br />
is,<br />
lation can be referred at some time.<br />
occupationally disabled included only those who.were<br />
The<br />
handicapped. There is no reason why all who were in this<br />
moderately<br />
group should not be referred at some time.<br />
with secondary work limitations included some Who<br />
Those<br />
and always will be able to function very well without the benefit<br />
were<br />
vocational rehabilitation services. Yet, there are many who would<br />
of<br />
appropriate for immediate referral because of vocational handicaps<br />
be<br />
a large number who were currently employed at the time of<br />
including<br />
survey. Early referral of handicapped individuals is encouraged<br />
the<br />
88
it has been demonstrated that early intervention with voca-<br />
since<br />
rehabilitation services is relatively more effective. Some<br />
tional<br />
in this group have handicaps that are growing progres-<br />
individuals<br />
worse and they will, therefore, at some future time, be<br />
sively<br />
for referral. These considerations lead to the con-<br />
appropriate<br />
that nationally at least 75 percent of these handicapped<br />
clusion<br />
individuals are potential referrals.<br />
Severely Disabled 6,100,000 x 75% 4,575,000<br />
Occupational Disability 5,014,000 x100% 5,014,000<br />
Secondary Work Limitation 6,639,000 x 75% 4,979,250<br />
ii percent is subtracted from this figure to eliminate<br />
If<br />
with mental or nervous conditions, the estimate is reduced to<br />
those<br />
12,965,742.<br />
national health surveys were not designed for use<br />
These<br />
estimating prevalence of disability in individual states because<br />
in<br />
differences in characteristics of the populations of the various<br />
of<br />
compared with the nation as a whole.<br />
states<br />
some wrk has been done on the development of<br />
However,<br />
state estimates so that National Health Survey data can<br />
synthetic<br />
applied to individual states with some measure of confidence.<br />
be<br />
procedure involves analyses of the characteristics of the popu-<br />
The<br />
of each state so that they may be taken into account in<br />
lation<br />
state estimates of prevalence of disability from National<br />
making<br />
Survey data. It so happens that the characteristics of the<br />
Health<br />
of Washington are not appreciably different from the<br />
population<br />
of the population of the nation ms a whole. Con-<br />
characteristics<br />
it was reported that the percentage of the handicapped<br />
sequently,<br />
population in Washington is the same as for the nation.<br />
is no serious problem presented in making pro-<br />
There<br />
of prevalence in future years since the experience of the<br />
jections<br />
Center for Health Statistics indicates that the rising<br />
National<br />
of some chronic conditions is offset by the declining in-<br />
incidence<br />
of others and the prevalence of all chronic conditions taken<br />
cidence<br />
proves to be a very stable statistic over a period of time.<br />
together<br />
view of the foregoing, it is possible to make a tenta-<br />
In<br />
estimate of the number of physically disabled persons in Wash-<br />
tive<br />
ington in 1975 who should, at some time, be referred for vocational<br />
Disability, Nerived from theNational<br />
Synthetic.StateEstimatesof<br />
U. S. Dept. of Health, Education, andWeifare,<br />
Hal'hhSurvey<br />
Publ Heih Service.<br />
89
services. This estimate is derived from the follow-<br />
rehabilitation<br />
calculations:<br />
ing<br />
number of vocationally handicapped, age 18-64<br />
12,965,742<br />
the United States<br />
in<br />
120,000,000 total number of persons, ages 18-64<br />
10.8%<br />
12,965,742<br />
120,000,000<br />
is the proportion of the population of employable age who are<br />
This<br />
handicapped and potential referrals for vocational rehab-<br />
physically<br />
ilitation services.<br />
is estimated by the Planning and Community Affairs Agency<br />
It<br />
the State of Washington that there will be 2,300,000 persons of<br />
of<br />
employable age (15 through 64) in Washington in 1975.<br />
2,300,000 x 10.8% 248,400 or rounded, 250,000<br />
is the estimate of the total number of physically disabled<br />
This<br />
in Washington who can be considered potential referrals for<br />
persons<br />
vocational rehabilitation services as of 1975.<br />
is evidence that. twice as many individuals not phys-<br />
There<br />
disabled can be considered potential referrals for vocational<br />
ically<br />
services as of 1975. Thus, 750,000 people are potential<br />
rehabilitation<br />
for VocationalRehabilitation services in Washington State<br />
referrals<br />
1975. This many people are likely to be able to meet the eligi-<br />
in<br />
requirements presently inthe law.<br />
bility<br />
is very little, information in the literature on the<br />
There<br />
of disability. As indicated, some chronic conditions have<br />
incidence<br />
incidence and for others the incidence is declining. The<br />
arising<br />
for purposes of estimating.vocational rehabilitation need<br />
objective<br />
to estimate the incidence in relationship to the prevalence of<br />
is<br />
physical disability among those of employable age in Washing-<br />
chronic<br />
ton who are potential referrals for vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation caseload statistics<br />
Analysisof<br />
that a majority of physically disabled clients served fall<br />
suggests<br />
a 20 year age range at the time of referral. Furthermore,<br />
within<br />
incidence of physical disability as a proportion of prevalence<br />
the<br />
with age and a large number of clients served by Vocational<br />
increases<br />
fall in the older age range. Therefore, it is estimated<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
the incidence of potential referrals to Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
that<br />
a one-year period is at least 1/20th or five percent of the<br />
during<br />
prevalence.<br />
90
x 5% 12,500 The estimate of the number of non-institu-<br />
250,000<br />
physically disabled persons<br />
tionalized<br />
Washington who should be referred for<br />
in<br />
services during the year 1975<br />
vocational<br />
x 5% 25,000 The estimate of the number of other dis-<br />
500,000<br />
persons in WaShington who should<br />
abled<br />
referred forvocational rehabilitation<br />
be<br />
during the year 1975<br />
services<br />
is, in addition, a substantial number of institutionalized<br />
There<br />
hospitalized) physically disabled persons who should also be re-<br />
(or<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation has been receiving some referrals<br />
ferred.<br />
general hospitals, VA hospitals and TB hospitals. It is expected<br />
from<br />
the number of referrals from hospitals will sharply increase be-<br />
that<br />
1969and 1975.<br />
tween<br />
rate of caseload turnover is expected to continue. The<br />
This<br />
to be referred in 1975 will be about equal to the number to be<br />
number<br />
(assuming the point of saturation is reached). Therefore, those<br />
closed<br />
enter the caseload (i.e., are referred for VR services) will com-<br />
who<br />
about fifty percent of the total number served. The number to<br />
prise<br />
referred is half of the number to be served and this figure (esti-<br />
be<br />
number of referrals) must be doubled in order to establish an<br />
mated<br />
of the nUmber of physically disabled persons to be served.<br />
estimate<br />
The estimated number of potential referrals is 37,500.<br />
x 2 25,000 The estimate of the number of physically<br />
12,500<br />
persons in Washington who should<br />
disabled<br />
receive VR services during, the year 1975<br />
x 2 50,000 The estimate of the number of other dis-<br />
25,000<br />
persons in Washington who should<br />
abled,<br />
receive VR .services during the year 1975.<br />
potential clients of Vocational Rehabilitation are<br />
The<br />
as prevalent in groups other than these physically disabled<br />
twice<br />
It has been stated that the mentally ill comprise a large<br />
persons.<br />
of our total population, perhaps i0 percent. Alcoholics are<br />
segment<br />
by some authors to have a genetic, metabolic illness, and<br />
considered<br />
some other authors to have a mental illness. Either way, no matter<br />
by<br />
the ideology of the ailment, our state has a great problem with<br />
what<br />
There is general agreement that Washington State has at<br />
alcoholics.<br />
i00,000 adults who are incapacitated because of alcoholism.<br />
least<br />
part of the population of the mentally ill and the alcoholics<br />
Only<br />
be helped by rehabilitation services now available. It is so<br />
can<br />
to society to rehabilitate those who can be helped that great<br />
useful<br />
should be made in this direction. The mentallyretarded, the<br />
effort<br />
offenders, the socially disadvantaged,are now fruitfully<br />
public<br />
being served by Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
91
potential clients in these groups of people who are<br />
The<br />
physically handicapped--the mentally ill, the alcoholics, mental<br />
not<br />
public offenders, the socially disadvantaged--are about<br />
retardates,<br />
that of those who are physically disabled. This relationship<br />
twice<br />
documented carefully in the Final Report, Comprehensive Statewide<br />
is<br />
for Vocational Rehabilitation Services,'Wisconsin, June 30,<br />
Planning<br />
1968, William Sather, Ph.D., Project Administrator.<br />
Poverty<br />
President Johnson in the ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE<br />
Former<br />
(1964)stated that, "The poor, and the children of the<br />
PRESIDENT<br />
are handicapped by illness and disability that could be<br />
poor,<br />
Largely as a result of the ill health that grows out of<br />
avoided.<br />
we rank below many other countries in the conquest of the<br />
poverty,<br />
and maternal mortality, in average life expectancy and nutri-<br />
infant<br />
We must speed and intensify our.efforts to make good health<br />
tion.<br />
accessible to the poor." In that report it is pointed out that<br />
more<br />
percent of Nonwhite families are poor. The President called for<br />
44<br />
direct action in order to.eradicate the menace of poverty.<br />
quick<br />
commonly occurring phrase in his report is "illness. and disability<br />
A<br />
could be avoided." Former President Johnson called for pre-<br />
that<br />
measures,-as well as curative measures. President Nixon's<br />
ventive<br />
statements and those of his Secretary of Health, Education,<br />
public<br />
and Welfare repeat this concern and specify recommended activity.<br />
rehabilitation agencies, under the coordination<br />
Vocational<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation, must assume responsibility in the area<br />
of<br />
prevention as well as the area of treatment. Martin Dishart,<br />
of<br />
the study of the prevalence of disability of Maryland recommended<br />
in<br />
"factors of economic need be considered for statewide program<br />
that<br />
as well as how the very poor.might be better protected from<br />
planning<br />
which seem to hit them the hardest." All persons deserve<br />
disabilities<br />
protection from ill-health. The effort must be greater for<br />
equal<br />
and/or racial minorities since their exposure to poor health<br />
poor<br />
is much greater.<br />
conditions<br />
persons, who are emotionally or psychologically dis-<br />
Poor<br />
are in great need of vocational rehabilitation services, as<br />
abled<br />
those who are physically disabled. Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
are<br />
best help all poor personswho have become psychologically handi-<br />
can<br />
as well as physically handicapped, by training them for mean-<br />
capped,<br />
remunerative employment, by financing the education that they<br />
ingful,<br />
for these are the inroads to success in our society; the inroads<br />
need,<br />
which these people have been deprived. It might be argued that<br />
of<br />
of these people do not qualify for vocational rehabilitation<br />
many<br />
because they have become chronically unemployable. If<br />
services,<br />
disability is to be preyented and if the problem of wasted<br />
future<br />
resources is to be overcome, the culturally disadvantaged<br />
human<br />
must be served well by vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
92
the problem of poverty is .not met head on, the rate of psycho-<br />
If<br />
as well as physical, disability will continue to increase.<br />
logical,<br />
child from a poor family is more likely to live in poverty as an<br />
A<br />
and is consequently more likely to be disabled. Disability<br />
adult<br />
the next adult generation can and must be avoided. If we can<br />
in<br />
all people with adequate education, vocational training,<br />
provide<br />
and sufficient income, the figures of disability pre-<br />
employment<br />
in this report can be greatly reduced.<br />
sented<br />
Prevention of Disability<br />
humanitarian and practical reasons, prevention needs to<br />
For<br />
an integral part of the ongoing vocational rehabilitation pro-<br />
become<br />
Great effort must be directed toward preventing unborn chil-<br />
gram.<br />
as well as young children, from being exposed to the environ-<br />
dren,<br />
conditions that lead to disability. The elimination of un-<br />
mental<br />
and under-employment, as well as adequate educational<br />
employment<br />
for the poor, is a most *ital preventive measure. If<br />
experiences<br />
disabled population continues to increase, vocational rehabili-<br />
the<br />
services cannot keep the. pace. The disabled population must<br />
tation<br />
not increase. Provide rehabilitation services to poor<br />
decrease,<br />
today, and the number of disabled persons, as well as the<br />
people<br />
of people-living below the poverty level, will be less to-<br />
number<br />
morrow.<br />
in Seattle, the Division of Vocational Rehab-.<br />
Fortunately,<br />
has established a Central Area office, and an office in<br />
ilitation<br />
Multipurpose State Office, which service almost exclusively res-<br />
the<br />
of the inner-city area. Most of their clients are not phys-<br />
idents<br />
handicapped but handicapped by the effects of being a racial<br />
ically<br />
poor, and unemployed or under-employed. This office is<br />
monority,<br />
a vital and refreshing role in confronting the problems that<br />
playing<br />
been presented above. There is a need for more such offices<br />
have<br />
Seattle, other metropolitan centers and rural areas in<br />
throughout<br />
State of Washington. This need is reflected in the budget re-<br />
the<br />
to the 41stState Legislature by the Governor and the Central<br />
quest<br />
Agency.<br />
Budget<br />
state has a special responsibility to try to rehabili-<br />
The<br />
those who are wholly or partly dependent on it and/or one of<br />
tate<br />
political subdivisions. We thus intend to have greatly expanded<br />
its<br />
for potential clients of vocational rehabilitation who are<br />
services<br />
by the state institutions. The following discussion of voca-<br />
served<br />
rehabilitation in the state institutions was prepared in part<br />
tional<br />
Andrea Ayers and Joseph Lurie, consultants to the Planning Com-<br />
by<br />
for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
mission<br />
93
State Institutions<br />
Department of Institutions of the State of Washington<br />
The<br />
the responsibility to provide institutional care and<br />
has<br />
for the blind, the deaf, the mentally retarded,<br />
treatment<br />
mentally ill, juvenile delinquents,'adult offenders<br />
the<br />
disabled veterans. To carry out this program there<br />
and<br />
two training schools for the blind and the deaf, three<br />
are<br />
hospitals, four schools for the mentally retarded,<br />
mental<br />
institutions for the juvenile delinquents, seven insti-<br />
ii<br />
for adult offenders and two homes for disabled<br />
tutions<br />
In addition to these institutions, the Depart-<br />
veterans.<br />
alsoprovides assistance for persons at 22 child<br />
ment<br />
centers, supervises juveniles on parole and ex-<br />
guidance<br />
consultation services for delinquency prevention.<br />
tends<br />
financial assistance and consultation are provided<br />
Also,<br />
12 day care centers for the mentally retarded. In the<br />
for<br />
fiscal year, the averagedaily institutional and<br />
1966<br />
parole population receiving services was 14,893.<br />
all institutions the goal is to train.or rehabilitate<br />
In<br />
patients or inmates to such an extent that they can<br />
the<br />
satisfactory adjustment which will permit them to<br />
make<br />
to the community. Obviously, there are many dis-<br />
return<br />
persons who have been in the institutions for a<br />
abled<br />
period of time and will probably never be able to<br />
long<br />
but most of the admissions can be released after<br />
leave,<br />
treatment if adequate staff and facilities are<br />
receiving<br />
A great deal of progress has been made in recent<br />
provided.<br />
in the development of effective treatment programs,<br />
years<br />
but much remains to be done.<br />
concerning institutions which is included in<br />
Information<br />
report has been taken from the December, 1966 State of Washington<br />
this.<br />
of Institutions Factual Analysis Concerning:. Progrs Per-<br />
Department<br />
Expenditures, Population Trends Length of Stay and Recidivism.<br />
sonnel<br />
above two paragraphs were taken from the preface of the Department<br />
The<br />
Institutions publication.<br />
of<br />
Adult Corrections<br />
crime rate in Washington, measured by the F.B.I. Crime<br />
The<br />
has increased thirty percent compared with a nine precent popu-<br />
Index,<br />
lation increase during the past five years.<br />
daily population within adult correctional institu-<br />
Average<br />
has increased 35.3 percent during the past three years and is<br />
tions<br />
expected to continue to rise.<br />
94
the inmate is 18-30 years old and of average in-<br />
Typically<br />
but lacks in academic achievement and work skills. The<br />
telligence,<br />
do not meet American Correctional Association's stand-<br />
institutions<br />
concerning availability of clinical services. The penitentiary<br />
ards<br />
caseloads are twice the minimum working standard recom-<br />
counselor<br />
Wonderful new facilities have been built at great costs to<br />
mended.<br />
able to have humane treatment of prisoners. This is a goal man-<br />
be<br />
by the Governor, the State Legislature, and the Department of<br />
dated<br />
Institutions.<br />
State Hospitals<br />
admissions have increased 57 percent during the<br />
Although<br />
decade, there has been a marked reduction in the rate of growth<br />
past<br />
the number of admissions to the state hospitals since 1964. As<br />
in<br />
population for the state is increasing rapidly, the slow rate<br />
the<br />
growth in the number of annual admissions in recent years is<br />
of<br />
as a temporary phenomenon, or the result of increased use of<br />
viewed<br />
community mental health clinics.<br />
1958, the resident population of the state mental<br />
Since<br />
has been reduced by one-half, even though the number of<br />
hospitals<br />
admissions has nearly doubled. Yet, there has also been an<br />
annual<br />
readmission rate, reflecting the lack of community facil-<br />
increased<br />
available which provide assistance to the former mental pa-<br />
ities<br />
In 1964, Washington had the lowest per capita expenditure<br />
tient.<br />
community treatment resources for the mentally ill of any state.<br />
for<br />
situation is better now.<br />
The<br />
percent of the admissions to state mental hospitals<br />
Forty<br />
in the 20-39 age bracket. Less than half of all persons had<br />
were<br />
high school, only one-fifth had some type of vocational<br />
completed<br />
and 70 percent of admissions in 1965 had incomes of $4000<br />
training,<br />
Thirty-one percent were housewife or housekeeper for their<br />
orless.<br />
family.<br />
own<br />
Menta I Retarda ton<br />
fiscal year 1966 the four state institutions for the<br />
In<br />
retarded served an average daily resident population.of<br />
mentally<br />
persons. Yet, the four state schools for the mentally retarded<br />
4,110<br />
only a small proportion of all potentially retarded persons<br />
service<br />
in the general population of the state.<br />
have usually assumed, though sometimes with<br />
Authorities<br />
that about three percent of the generalpopulatlon in<br />
reservations,<br />
the United States is mentally retarded to some degree.<br />
95
on statewide population estimates, the total number<br />
Based<br />
mentally retarded persons in Washington will increase from 93,200<br />
of<br />
1965 to 101,700 in 1970 and to 111,600 in 1975. In King County<br />
in<br />
for 1965, there were an estimated 30,722 mentally retarded<br />
alone,<br />
individuals.<br />
40 percent of the residents in institutions for the<br />
About<br />
retarded were under 20 years of age in 1965. Both institu-<br />
mentally<br />
and community programs are largely designed for younger per-<br />
tional<br />
who may potentially achieve greater success in treatment, train-<br />
sons<br />
and other rehabilitative programs than retardates in older age<br />
ing,<br />
groups.<br />
Juvenile De linquency<br />
available statistics indicate that the level of<br />
Latest<br />
referrals for delinquency remained at a higher level than that<br />
court<br />
the nation as a whole since 1957. In 1964, there were 344 re-<br />
for<br />
for delinquency per i0,000 juveniles aged i0 through 17 in<br />
ferrals<br />
while for the United States there were 236 referrals per<br />
Washington,<br />
juveniles among the same age group.<br />
I0,000<br />
average daily population of Washington's juvenile re-<br />
The<br />
facilities has risen every year since fiscal 1956. It<br />
habilitation<br />
increased from 344 in fiscal 1955 to 1,006 in fiscal 1966, a<br />
has<br />
gain of 192 percent. During the entire period sinne fiscal<br />
total<br />
the institutional population has exceeded the total capacity<br />
1956,<br />
the institutions. The institutions have been almost continually<br />
of<br />
despite repeated additions to capacity and severe<br />
overpopulated,<br />
in the average length of stay since fiscal 1963. As the<br />
reductions<br />
length of stay decreases, the .assistance that can be pro-<br />
average<br />
for the individual also decreases. Few of these people have<br />
vided<br />
referred to Vocational Rehabilitation in the past. They must<br />
been<br />
referred for help in the future.<br />
be<br />
caseload has increased from 1462 in fiscal year<br />
Average<br />
to 2,350 in fiscal 1966, for an average annual increase of<br />
1960<br />
i0.i percent. It is estimated that the average daily caseload<br />
about<br />
rise from the 2,350 seen in .fiscal year 1966 to 2,850 in fiscal<br />
will<br />
It is hoped these improved methods of treatment for those<br />
1969.<br />
young people will change this gloomy picture.<br />
disabled<br />
may be significant that the period when average length<br />
It<br />
stay was rising (or stabliized at about ii months) overlaps the<br />
of<br />
when the recidivism rate dropped from 30.3 percent (for<br />
period<br />
year 1959) to 23.5 percent (for fiscalyear 1962). Since<br />
fiscal<br />
fiscal 1962, recidivism has shown a tendency to rise.<br />
96
atio of males to females has remained close to three<br />
The<br />
one. With the exception of 1964, the median age of committed<br />
to<br />
has varied little from 15.5 years fo both males and fe-<br />
juveniles<br />
males.<br />
Sensory Handicapped<br />
State of Washington is served by a school for the blind<br />
The<br />
one for the deaf. Their principal purpose is to educate appro-<br />
and<br />
handicapped students, both academically and vocationally,<br />
priately<br />
a specialized residential program so they may return to the<br />
through<br />
community as independent, useful and productive citizens.<br />
school for the blind is operatingat full capacity.<br />
The<br />
average daily population for 1966 wasf28, changing little from<br />
The<br />
years. Of the present enrollment at the school, 52.2 per-<br />
previous<br />
of the students were male, while 47..8 percent were female.<br />
cent<br />
length of attendance for the students enrolled at the end of<br />
Median<br />
current school term was 2-1/2 years. More than half of the stu-<br />
.the<br />
dents leaving the school complete, the course of training.<br />
average population for the school for the deaf stood<br />
The<br />
307 for fiscal 1966. At the close of the 1966 year, there were 197<br />
at<br />
and 112 females. Students range in age from four to 21 with<br />
males<br />
percent in the five to nine year old group. The median length<br />
48.9<br />
attendance at the school is three years, two months, and the major-<br />
of<br />
of the students discharged at the end of the school term complete<br />
ity<br />
their courses of training.<br />
blind and deaf children are now being served in public<br />
Both<br />
in this state. The services offered them in their home<br />
schools<br />
communities' private non-profit agencies are the best in the country.<br />
Washington State Child Guidance Centers are established<br />
"The<br />
community outpatient clinics to provide treatment for the emotional<br />
as<br />
behavioral problems of children and their families. The basic<br />
and<br />
principle is that professional assistance provided for<br />
underlying<br />
when problems first arise will prevent and correct situa-<br />
families<br />
which could result in more serious problems, improving the<br />
tions<br />
potential for achieving satisfactory social and emotional<br />
child's<br />
maturity."<br />
offered by the Child Guidance Centers have been<br />
Services<br />
yet still are not entirely sufficient to satisfy increas-<br />
expanded,<br />
public demand. In spite of increases in caseloads of the social<br />
ing<br />
it has been necessary to establish a waiting list for those<br />
workers,<br />
desiring services during those periods when the Guidance<br />
persons<br />
operating at capacity.<br />
Centers.are<br />
97
fiscal year 1958 through 1966, 8,495 cases have been<br />
From<br />
The number of cases served rose from 765 in fiscal year<br />
served.<br />
to 1,677 in 1966; while the number of cases closed rose from<br />
1968<br />
to 1,219.<br />
450<br />
fiscal year 1966, the mean number of cases on the<br />
During<br />
list was 382 each month, or approximately equivalent to two-<br />
waiting<br />
thirds of an additional social worker caseload per center.<br />
education classes in the public schools are help-<br />
Special<br />
many more of these disturbed children than in the past.<br />
ing<br />
Veterans Facilities<br />
has two State Veterans' Institutions and one<br />
Washington<br />
Colony which provide domicilliary and/or nursing care for in-<br />
Home<br />
digent, honorably discharged veterans..<br />
average population of these three residencies has re-<br />
The<br />
steady for the past five years, and it can be expected to<br />
mained<br />
fairly constant. For fiscal year 1966 the average was 676.<br />
remain<br />
median age for all residents is presently 72.2 years, although<br />
The<br />
new members entering the homes are likely to be somewhat older.<br />
has been included on institutions in this re-<br />
Information<br />
because they serve a rehabilitative function, and because there<br />
port<br />
at present a need for increased personnel in many of the state's<br />
is<br />
On the following page is material concerning people<br />
institutions.<br />
working age (16-60) discharged annually from Washington State<br />
of<br />
Many of these people will be considered vocationally<br />
Institutions.<br />
and will require further services to encourage their suc-<br />
disabled,<br />
rehabilitation.<br />
cessful<br />
material on the next page was provided by Audrey<br />
The<br />
Ph.D., Research Administrator, Department of Institutions,<br />
Holiday,<br />
July 12, 1968.<br />
98
OF WORKING AGE (16-60) DISCHARGED<br />
PEOPLE<br />
FROM WASHINGTON STATE INSTITUTIONS<br />
ANNUALLY<br />
* Adult Corrections<br />
** Juvenile Rehabilitation<br />
*** Mental Hospitals<br />
**** Mental Retardation<br />
All Institutions<br />
1965 1966 1967<br />
1,104 1,251 1,552<br />
811 839 891<br />
3,606 3,489 3,413<br />
160(Est) 165(Est) 200(Est)<br />
5,681 5,744 6,056<br />
A release in Adult Corrections refers to inmates released<br />
*<br />
parole and discharged.<br />
to<br />
A release in Juvenile Rehabilitation refers to persons<br />
**<br />
to parole and direct discharge.<br />
released<br />
A release in Mental Health refers to discharges or moves<br />
***<br />
terminal leave.<br />
to<br />
Arelease in Mental Retardation includes those discharged<br />
****<br />
put on placement.<br />
or<br />
99
Imp l i ca ti ons<br />
seek to determine how many handicapped persons there<br />
Why<br />
in Washington? If we are to provide all handicapped persons<br />
are<br />
rehabilitation services by 1975, we must have the facilities<br />
with<br />
the personnel to do the job. In order to do'what is necessary,<br />
and<br />
the need must be clearly demonstrated.<br />
Why the Need?<br />
results which have been presented in this report indicate<br />
The<br />
Washington is currently not meeting the needs of its handicapped<br />
that<br />
Washington is a growing state. The rapid influx of persons<br />
citizens.<br />
all over the United States, especially into the Puget Sound metro-<br />
from<br />
area, is accelerating the overall population growth of the<br />
politan<br />
Similarly, the number of disabled persons in the state is<br />
state.<br />
to increase. If the goal of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />
likely<br />
Rehabilitation, the provision of rehabilitation services to<br />
tional<br />
disabled persons by 1975, is to be realized, the state's rehabili-<br />
all<br />
services will also have to increase.<br />
tation<br />
of persons rahabilicaCed per 100,000 population, by as£on and scare; and rank<br />
Number<br />
stae, 1964-1968<br />
by<br />
Rehabilitated per i00,000 H<br />
Region<br />
[l- popular:ion 1/ -- R,ank<br />
and<br />
is rounded nearest whole number, based the astimaed total popula£on of Juy i, for each fiscal<br />
Race<br />
Bureau of the Census: Seriea P-25.<br />
year.<br />
Adequacy of Current Services<br />
important question which must be answered before attempt-<br />
An<br />
to plan for the expansion of rehabilitation services to the year<br />
ing<br />
is to what degree are the needs of the present handicapped popu-<br />
1975<br />
being met? If we are currently providing all needy.handicapped<br />
lation<br />
with an adequate rehabilitation program, then it is a fairly<br />
citizens<br />
task to compute what will be needed by 1975. However, the<br />
simple<br />
complicated by the fact that only 8 percent of the disabled<br />
taskis<br />
has ever been to an office of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
population<br />
while 45 percent of that population has not even heard of Vocational<br />
i00
(DVR) which is now the state coordinating agency<br />
rehabilitation<br />
vocational rehabilitation services. The majority of handi-<br />
for<br />
persons in every state have never received vocational rehab-<br />
capped<br />
from the Vocational Rehabilitation state agency.<br />
ilitation<br />
barest minimum estimate of the number of disabled<br />
The<br />
eligible for vocational rehabilitation services in the<br />
persons<br />
of Washington is90,000. Comparing these figures with statis-<br />
state<br />
in the CASELOAD STATISTICS, STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
tics<br />
1968, of the U. S. Department of Health, Education, and<br />
AGENCIES,<br />
we find that in 1968, 1,619 disabled persons were reported<br />
Welfare,<br />
having been rehabilitated, Washington ranks 49th among the 50<br />
as<br />
in numbers rehabilitated per i00,000 population. (Depart-<br />
states<br />
of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1968) The difference be-<br />
ment<br />
the minimum estimate of disabled persons in the state, who<br />
tween<br />
in need of vocational rehabilitation services, and the number<br />
are<br />
by the State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />
rehabilitated<br />
the gap between what is needed and what is offered.<br />
illustrates<br />
of Washington's citizens in need of vocational rehabili-<br />
Thousands<br />
tation cannot be served.<br />
of the 45 percent of the disabled persons who have<br />
What<br />
heard of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation? Only 41<br />
not<br />
of the disabled in one study said they had been helped.<br />
percent<br />
minimum estimate of the number of disabled persons eligible for<br />
The<br />
in need of vocational rehabilitation in Washington is 90,000.<br />
and<br />
the Washington State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Could<br />
the rehabilitation plans of an additional 90,000 dis-<br />
coordinate<br />
persons? It is very unlikely in light of the fact that more<br />
abled<br />
12,093 persons who were referred by June 1968, werelwaiting<br />
than<br />
be helped at the end of the fiscal year.- A vast expansion of<br />
to<br />
rehabilitation services is an immediate need, or the<br />
vocational<br />
of unhelped people will continue to multiply. The problem<br />
backlog<br />
continue to grow and human resources will continue to be<br />
will<br />
As the problem increases, it will become more difficult<br />
wasted.<br />
handle. This is true in the case of the overall number of dis-<br />
to<br />
persons in the state, as well as with the individual disabled<br />
abled<br />
person.<br />
..<br />
ReSion<br />
and<br />
$., tot@l<br />
U.<br />
totl<br />
General,<br />
Blind, total<br />
Washineton<br />
Blind<br />
Washington<br />
1968<br />
Rehabill<br />
tated Sarvsd<br />
680,415<br />
207,918<br />
654138<br />
200.246<br />
26.277<br />
7,672<br />
6827<br />
1,619<br />
536<br />
143<br />
g67<br />
!lhab1- Rehabli£-<br />
tared Sjrved<br />
2O +<br />
2O +<br />
19 +<br />
20 +<br />
+ 34<br />
+<br />
+7<br />
$<br />
I01<br />
6<br />
964<br />
tared Served<br />
74 + 70<br />
+<br />
74 + + 7i<br />
63 + 47<br />
+ 70<br />
35<br />
78<br />
+165<br />
Rehabl£-<br />
Served<br />
tsted<br />
+4<br />
+8<br />
+146<br />
+160<br />
• i0 + 84<br />
69 + 66<br />
I$'6<br />
+<br />
+173
has shown that the longer people remain unpro-<br />
Research<br />
the longer and more difficult it is to restore them to<br />
ductive,<br />
that is why, for example, the trend is to accelerate<br />
productivity;<br />
rehabilitation process for cardiac patients. It is known that<br />
the<br />
individuals who have suffered heart attacks ever return to<br />
few<br />
if they have not done so within a year afte the onset of their<br />
work<br />
Speedy rehabilitation is a preventive measure. Those dis-<br />
attack.<br />
individuals who have to wait for services are not being helped<br />
abled<br />
impeded. Delay in the rehabilitation process, in many instances,<br />
but<br />
the effects of the disability and diminishes the likeli-<br />
intensifies<br />
of success. Approximately 750,000 disabled persons in need of<br />
hood<br />
today are not receiving that help. The task of providing<br />
services<br />
disabled persons in Washington with adequate rehabilitation<br />
all<br />
by 1975 is an immense one.<br />
services<br />
Size of the Conitment<br />
of the goals of the Washington State Vocational<br />
Attainment<br />
Commission requires a total state and federal commitment to<br />
Planning<br />
goals. A special grant will not solve the problem. An experi-<br />
these<br />
or a demonstration program will not solve the problem. What<br />
mental<br />
needed is a vast ongoing human and monetary commitment. The com-<br />
is<br />
must be great, for the problem is an immense one. The pro-<br />
mitment<br />
is one of wasted human resources accompanied by the loss of<br />
blem<br />
dignity and feelings of self-worth. In our society, meaning-<br />
human<br />
employment represents the major path to the attainment of dignity<br />
ful<br />
self-worth. Those who are deprived of that path are deprived of<br />
and<br />
a meaningful, productive life. The solution of this major<br />
leading<br />
will, in 1975, depend upon the depth of our commitment today.<br />
problem<br />
Rehabi li tation ?<br />
undoubtedly, often do not receive the personal<br />
Clients,<br />
that they need, either before or after job placement<br />
attention<br />
Rehabilitation is.generally considered to be reached when<br />
occurs.<br />
client is placed into gainful employment. It is a mistake to view<br />
a<br />
placement as the end of the rehabilitation process. It is re-<br />
job<br />
that an extended follow-up program for some clients be in-<br />
commended<br />
into the ongoing rehabilitation process. Continued coun-<br />
corporated<br />
should be offered to most clients after they have beenplaced<br />
seling<br />
the job, for adjustment to the world of work is often no easy<br />
on<br />
Employment, for many, creates new problems which must be worked<br />
task.<br />
Gainful employment is an important stage in the rehabili-<br />
through.<br />
process, but it does not constitute rehabilitation. Job place-<br />
tation<br />
does not automatically guarantee mental health or the experi-<br />
ment<br />
of feelings of self-worth. Are the 1,619 individuals who were<br />
encing<br />
by the State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
rehabilitated<br />
healthy and self-satisfied, or are they just working? In<br />
mentally<br />
fact, are they still working? A follow-up program designed to answer<br />
102
questions must be an integral part of the rehabilitation pro-<br />
these<br />
for without such a follow-up, it cannot be said that rehabili-<br />
cess,<br />
tation has occurred.<br />
DVR Eligibility Requirements<br />
far, an attempt has been made to illustrate how far<br />
Thus<br />
present program fails to meet the needs of the disabled persons<br />
the<br />
Washington. Now, consider the eligibility requirements of the<br />
in<br />
The recently broadened requirements reflect a national com-<br />
DVR.<br />
toward solving this major problem of wasted human resources.<br />
mitment<br />
the commitment were a strong one, the eligibility requirements<br />
If<br />
be broad, not narrow. One major eligibility requirement is<br />
would<br />
clients must show potential for returning to or entering into<br />
that<br />
employment. If the commitment were strong, rehabilitation<br />
gainful<br />
would aim at uncovering that potential where it is not<br />
services<br />
To reject a person as unqualified for rehabilitation ser-<br />
evident.<br />
is to mark him as unqualified for a productive life. The<br />
vices<br />
cases, the ones who need help the most, too often, are<br />
difficult<br />
away. Those individualswho appear hopeless are labeled<br />
turned<br />
and are rejected as ineligible for rehabilitation services.<br />
"risks"<br />
need to expect more from people for, if we expect less, we will<br />
We<br />
less. Likewise, it must be expected that more services will be<br />
get<br />
to more people if the goal of rehabilitating the State's<br />
extended<br />
disabled population is to be realized.<br />
1969 definition of disability, recognized by the Di-<br />
The<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation, is the kind of commitment that<br />
vision<br />
needed to solve the problem. Presently, those persons who are<br />
is<br />
likely candidateS for vocational rehabilitation services are<br />
most<br />
by some physical or. intellectual deficiency. People who<br />
handicapped<br />
unemployed for other reasons used to be rejected. The services<br />
are<br />
by the "non-disabled" program of the Division of Vocational<br />
provided<br />
represent a step in the direction of helping persons<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
are unemployed for other reasons, such as cultural deprivation.<br />
who<br />
program was a token effort. The psychological and experiential<br />
This<br />
that poverty has on the individual creates a vocational dis-<br />
effects<br />
Chronic unemployment is a vocational disability. Inadequate<br />
ability.<br />
inferior education leads to a vocational disability. Hatred for<br />
and<br />
and race constitutes a devastating vocational handicap.<br />
self<br />
persons are more likely to be physically, as well as<br />
Poor<br />
disabled than are middle class persons. The Divi-<br />
psychologically,<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation could and should provide a greatly<br />
sion<br />
service to persons handicapped by these disabilities. The<br />
needed<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation is struggling to meet the needs<br />
Division<br />
those who qualify (and apply) for services under past standards.<br />
of<br />
broaden the eligibility requirements, as was done in 1968, with<br />
To<br />
current facilities and personnel, will mean adding thousands of<br />
the<br />
more names to the waiting list. This clearly illustrates the scope<br />
103
WHITE<br />
Races, State of Washington.<br />
Nonwhite<br />
State Planning and Community Affairs Agency, 1968<br />
Washington<br />
INCOME,NONWHITE RACIAL GROUPS<br />
MEDIAN<br />
1950 AND 1960<br />
WASHINGTON.<br />
BY SEX: 1960<br />
INCOML:,<br />
INCOME IN DOLLARS<br />
MEDIAN<br />
0 1,000 2,000 3 000 4 000 5 000<br />
4, 82<br />
//////////////////A<br />
1,382<br />
2,839<br />
JAPANESE 4.168<br />
CHINESE<br />
FILIPINO<br />
NEGRO<br />
INDIAN<br />
WHITE<br />
JAPANESE<br />
CHINESE<br />
FILIPINO<br />
NEGRO<br />
INDIAN<br />
m..<br />
1,552<br />
1,526<br />
m 1,402<br />
2,000<br />
2.305<br />
m 2,682<br />
TOTAl POPUlATiON: 1950 AND 1960<br />
NCOMI:,<br />
INCOME IN DOLLARS<br />
MEDIAN<br />
0 l,O00 2.000 3.000<br />
909<br />
1,402<br />
1,826<br />
m 2,305<br />
104<br />
2.839<br />
2,733<br />
2,682<br />
3,008<br />
3,237<br />
TOTAL<br />
1960<br />
F////// 19 s o
the changes and expansion which must be implemented if the goal<br />
of<br />
providing adequate rehabilitation services to all of Washington's<br />
of<br />
disabled persons by 1975 is to be achieved.<br />
most disadvantaged single monority group in Washington<br />
The<br />
is the American Indian. The income of the egro is approxi-<br />
State<br />
3/5 that of the white group in Washington State. The income<br />
mately<br />
the Indian is only approximately 2/5 of the income of the white<br />
of<br />
group. (See. preceding page.)<br />
foregoing presentation documents the thesis that non-<br />
The<br />
races in the State of Washington differ significantly, as well<br />
white<br />
consistently, from one another in terms of the three dimensional<br />
as<br />
of education, occupation, and income. In order to sum-<br />
hierarchies<br />
thelarge volume of detailed data for each of the three di-<br />
marize<br />
into a single numerical index, weighted averages were com-<br />
mensions<br />
on the basis of standardized scores developed by Charles B.<br />
pute<br />
Nam.<br />
of Socioeconomic Status 1960. In order to derive<br />
Profiles<br />
series of comparable, generalized profiles for the various ethnic<br />
a<br />
the raw scores were transformed into percentages. The result-<br />
groups,<br />
data are portrayed graphically in the following table.. There is<br />
ant<br />
distinct separation in the hierarchical position on all three dimen-<br />
a<br />
occupation, and income--between Japanese, Caucasions,<br />
sions--education,<br />
Chinese, on one hand, and Negroes, Filipinos, and Indians, on the<br />
and<br />
The Japanese, with a raw score of 60.3, or a transformed<br />
other.<br />
of 23.2 percent, are far above any other group in educational<br />
score<br />
The corresponding scores for Caucasians are 49.9 and 19.2<br />
status.<br />
for Chinese, 44.0 and 17.Opercent; for Negroes, 39.6 and<br />
percent;<br />
percent; for Filipinos, 33.5 and 12.9 percent; and for Indians,<br />
15.3<br />
and 12.4 percent. Chinese and Japanese, with almost identical<br />
32.1<br />
rank first and second, respectively, in occupational status,<br />
scores,<br />
Caucasians are in third place. The three remaining groups--<br />
and<br />
Filipinos, and Indians--conform to a remarkably consistent<br />
Negroes,<br />
toward the lower end of the scale on all three dimensions.<br />
pattern<br />
indicated previously, Caucasians rank highe@t on income, followed<br />
As<br />
in order by Japanese and Chinese.<br />
I.<br />
B. Nam, M_hod01Ogy and Scores of SOcioeconomic Status,<br />
Charles<br />
Paper No. 15 of the Census, 1963). The computational<br />
(Working<br />
used in deriving the Various scores discussed in this<br />
procedures<br />
are an adaptation of Nam's techniques and weighting sys-<br />
section<br />
to grouped data. The Nam scores for major occupational<br />
tem<br />
educational status, and income were applied to the appro-<br />
groups,<br />
categories of the several minority races. The resultant<br />
priate<br />
represent weighted averages for each dimension of each<br />
scores<br />
The transformed scores for each race are precentages<br />
race.<br />
from the sum of the original scores of each dimension.<br />
derived<br />
105
Races, State of Washington<br />
Nonwhite<br />
State Planning and Community Affairs Agency, 1968<br />
Washington<br />
20<br />
n.<br />
1,5<br />
I-<br />
NONWHITE<br />
PROFILES :<br />
SOCIOECONOMIC<br />
GROUPS,WASHINGTON" 1960<br />
RACIAL<br />
/NEGRO<br />
PERTAIN TO MALE<br />
:DAIA<br />
POPULATION<br />
EDUCATION OCCUPATION INCOME<br />
106
Disabili.t.y<br />
Blind<br />
Rehabilitation services were started in the early<br />
Vocational<br />
They were started in a modest way and in the education agencies<br />
1920s.<br />
state government. Services to the blind were honsidered so special<br />
of<br />
many states that they were provided by separate agencies often in<br />
in<br />
public welfare agency. There has been a trend nationwide to incor-<br />
the<br />
blind rehabilitation services into the agency providing voca-<br />
porate<br />
tional rehabilitation services for all other disability groups.<br />
THE COISSION RECOIENDS:<br />
transfer should be made of vocational rehabilitation<br />
That<br />
of Services to the Blind from the Department of<br />
aspects<br />
Public Assistance to Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
people were once thought of as being unable to be self-<br />
Blind<br />
Even today a blind person is given an extra exemption on<br />
supporting.<br />
income tax. The economic success of many blind people would seem<br />
his<br />
belie this notion of extra handicap. Blind people compete success-<br />
to<br />
in.most economic endeavors today. In fact, the blind people as<br />
fully<br />
group are rehabilitated so successfully that attention has shifted<br />
a<br />
those whose only handicap is blindness. Joseph Hunt, Commissioner,<br />
from<br />
Services Administration of the United States Department<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Health, Education, and Welfare, in an address delivered in July 1968,<br />
of<br />
this to say:<br />
had<br />
are some who have expressed the opinion that serving<br />
There<br />
multi-handicapped blind is idealistic and highly unecon-<br />
the<br />
We do not agree with this pessimistic philosophy.<br />
omical.<br />
are too many examples of individuals who have made it<br />
There<br />
or without our support and encouragement, After all,<br />
with<br />
need only go back 25 years in history to find the same<br />
we<br />
defeatist attitude expressed about the handicap<br />
dogmatic,<br />
blindness alone.<br />
of<br />
statement concerning services to the blind in Washington<br />
A<br />
was provided by the veteran State Supervisor, Services for the<br />
State<br />
Mrs. Valerie Brakel, prior to her retirement in 1968. Her state-<br />
Blind,<br />
follows:<br />
ment<br />
for the Blind is a Unit in the State Department of<br />
Services<br />
Assistance. Two major programs are provided by our<br />
Public<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation and Prevention of Blind-<br />
Agency<br />
We confine our efforts to the visually handicapped.<br />
ness.<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation Program operates under the<br />
The<br />
rules, regulations, and laws as those of the Division<br />
same<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation. Services are. provided on a<br />
of<br />
basis.<br />
statewide<br />
107
estoration services include medical and surgical<br />
Physical<br />
hospitalization; nursing services; convalescent,<br />
treatment;<br />
or rest home care; drugs and supplies; prosthetic<br />
nursing,<br />
dentistry; physical therapy, occupational therapy;<br />
devices;<br />
directed speech or hearing therapy; and psychiatric<br />
medically<br />
treatment.<br />
is provided in accordance with the physical limita-<br />
Training<br />
and vocational aptitudes, interests, and individual<br />
tions<br />
needs.<br />
The Agency provides transportation costs<br />
Transportation.<br />
diagnostic services as well as vocational rehabilitation<br />
for<br />
services.<br />
is provided during the training period and also<br />
Maintenance<br />
placement until the client actually receives<br />
following<br />
remuneration for his employment for a full pay period.<br />
goods and services. The Agency provides guidance,<br />
Other<br />
placement, tools, equipment, initial stock and<br />
counseling,<br />
and occupational licenses to assist the client to<br />
supplies,<br />
in a gainful occupation.<br />
participate<br />
Center. Services for the Blind operates a<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Rehabilitation Center. Approximately 50% of our<br />
Regional<br />
is referred to the Center for diagnostic and<br />
clientele<br />
services.<br />
evaluation<br />
of Blindness involves restoration and conservation<br />
Prevention<br />
vision. One hundred and fifty ophthalmologists participate<br />
of<br />
in the program.<br />
Committees..The Agency has two advisory committees.<br />
Advis.ory<br />
A State AdvisoryCommittee consists of three members<br />
(a)<br />
by the Director of the State Department of Public<br />
appointed<br />
for a three-year period. Its function is to<br />
Assistance<br />
State Services for the Blind and other agencies<br />
coordinate<br />
services to blind individuals. (b) Eye Physicians<br />
providing<br />
Committee. This committee is composed of eight<br />
Advisory<br />
selected on a statewide basis. They serve for a<br />
members<br />
of four years. Each member must be a participating<br />
term<br />
in the Services for the Blind Program. The<br />
ophthalmologist<br />
of this committee is to set standards in the formu-<br />
function<br />
of policies in relation to eye care. The committee<br />
lation<br />
in educational programs, staff development, and the<br />
assists<br />
of information to the public in the field of<br />
dissemination<br />
Prevention of Blindness.<br />
108
Deaf<br />
is now recognized that deafness is a catastrophically<br />
It<br />
condition, particularly for those whose deafness exists from<br />
disabling<br />
Those deaf people who are successful vocationally are most apt<br />
birth.<br />
be in the manual occupations rather than in the professions. Almost<br />
to<br />
deaf students in college are in a college exclusively for the deaf<br />
all<br />
in Washington, D.C. The people who are blind, in contrast to<br />
located<br />
deaf, can usually manage satisfactorily to have college training<br />
the<br />
students without disabilities.<br />
with<br />
has been recommended that federal law be changed so that an<br />
It<br />
who is deaf would have an additional exemption on his income<br />
individual<br />
tax.<br />
Dental Health<br />
many of the applicants for vocational rehabilitation<br />
Very<br />
have a disability plus defective teeth. Routinely, clients<br />
services<br />
vocational rehabilitation services are examined by a physician.<br />
for<br />
is more rare for them to be sent for a dental examination. Poor<br />
It<br />
health is one of the most, common ailments of those in need of<br />
dental<br />
rehabilitation services.<br />
vocational<br />
studies of the incidence of dental caries in<br />
Comprehensive<br />
and youth have been made in every section of the United States.<br />
children<br />
A composite picture of these studies provides some startling facts:<br />
percent of all two-year-old children have one or more<br />
Fifty<br />
teeth;<br />
carious<br />
the time children reach school age they have three or more<br />
By<br />
primary teeth;<br />
decayed<br />
age 16, the average youth has seven decayed, missing or<br />
By<br />
teeth involving 14 tooth surfaces;<br />
filled<br />
than four percent of high school pupils are free of<br />
Less<br />
decay.<br />
dental<br />
addition to these devastating, facts, we know that the six-<br />
In<br />
molar is the most frequent decay casualty the oldest and perhaps<br />
year<br />
important tooth in the mouth. Also, some studies indicate that<br />
most<br />
at age six, the permanent teeth are attacked at an average<br />
beginning<br />
of approximately one tooth.. erson per e. So at age 20,<br />
rate<br />
averageperson has 14 decayed, missing or filled permanent teeth.<br />
the<br />
let us consider some economics. Unfortunately for the<br />
Now<br />
book, it may be reasonable to estimatethat the cost of treat-<br />
pocket<br />
for dental caries in the United States exceeds the cost of treat-<br />
ment<br />
for any other single disease. It is certain that the high cost<br />
ment<br />
dental neglect can be counted among our of nation's pressing<br />
most<br />
problems.<br />
health<br />
109
are other dental health problems which must also receive<br />
There<br />
Research indicates that roughly half of our school children<br />
attention.<br />
evidence of malocclusion. In one survey of 119,000 school child-<br />
have<br />
50 percent had some form of dento-facial abnormalities of which<br />
ren,<br />
80 percent might have been prevented. In other words, one, third<br />
over<br />
the child population was found to suffer from preventable abnormal-<br />
of<br />
ities of the teeth and jaws.<br />
third problem which certainly deserves the attention of<br />
A<br />
and research is that of periodontal diseases. This group of<br />
education<br />
disorders may occur in children when the primary teeth are being<br />
dental<br />
and the permanent teeth are erupting. However, periodontal dis-<br />
shed<br />
are usually associated with adults and they have the unenviable<br />
eases<br />
of being cited as the most common cause of tooth loss in adult<br />
position<br />
life.<br />
recommendations were made concerning dental problems<br />
Several<br />
URBAN WASHINGTON APATHY OR ACTION:<br />
in<br />
to insure that dental hygiene knowledge overcomes all<br />
First,<br />
and language barriers,<br />
cultural<br />
recommend that all local health dep.artments employ<br />
in_-'-disenous<br />
We<br />
to work within minority, and deprived<br />
person_s<br />
communit ies.<br />
to assure that our young people receive this know-<br />
Second,<br />
ledge.<br />
recommend improved instruction in dental hygiene within<br />
pu---blic<br />
We<br />
private schools, especially at the elementary<br />
and<br />
level,<br />
to help eliminate communications barriers between<br />
Third,<br />
care professionals and the poor,<br />
dental<br />
recommend that the Washington State Dental Association<br />
We<br />
cooperation with institutions of highereducation create<br />
i-<br />
programs fo__ralldenta ! professionals t__o<br />
informational<br />
greater cultural and social awareness. We further<br />
cultivate<br />
thatall dntal pr--essionals have an internship<br />
recommend<br />
racial or ethnic minority, area.<br />
in.a<br />
dentists certainly must be commended for taking the lead<br />
The<br />
Washington in advocating a method of alleviating dental<br />
in<br />
on a widespread, inexpensive basis, that is, fluori-<br />
problems<br />
of the water. This approach is the most practical<br />
dation<br />
economical step that can be taken in the dental health<br />
and<br />
Therefore,<br />
field.<br />
ii0.
ecommend legislation on a statewide basis providing fo__r<br />
We<br />
in Washington state's municipal domestic water<br />
fluoridation<br />
systems as a nutriment for bones and teeth.<br />
arguments for fluoridation are many, and all need not be<br />
The<br />
here. There are three points,.however, that should<br />
repeated<br />
be stressed. One, fluoridation is not expensive. If it<br />
now<br />
required on a statewide basis, the state could provide<br />
were<br />
necessary mechanisms for very little cost. Second, many<br />
the<br />
the communities in our state already have natural fluoride<br />
of<br />
their water systems. Third, the additional fluoride to<br />
in<br />
water reduces the number of cavities and other den-<br />
drinking<br />
problems by almost two-thirds for such a small invest-<br />
tal<br />
of funds.<br />
ment<br />
next essential step in dental care is to make it avail-<br />
The<br />
to everybody. Therefore,<br />
able<br />
recommend that the Department of Public Assistance provide<br />
W__e<br />
for more extensive an__d continuousdental car, and that<br />
funds<br />
practicing dentists b__e fully informed regarding the current<br />
al__l<br />
of remuneration.<br />
rate<br />
than just funds are necessary. The dentists must be able<br />
More<br />
relate to the people they are serving in these programs.<br />
to<br />
are also many families who are earning enough to stay<br />
There<br />
the welfare rolls, yet they cannot afford adequate dental<br />
off<br />
Health insurance programs often do not include dental<br />
care.<br />
Employment disability insurance usually does not<br />
provisions.<br />
any dental help either. The private and public sectors<br />
offer<br />
work together to solve this critical problem. There-<br />
should<br />
fore,<br />
recommend that the Washington State Dental Association<br />
We<br />
state agencies create provisions fo__r<br />
R_ppropriate<br />
families (not on public assistance) to obtain<br />
low-icome<br />
deltas care<br />
adequ<br />
was no discussion in the report of the Governor's<br />
There<br />
Council on Urban Affairs concerning the role of the Vocational<br />
Advisory<br />
agency in dental health. The funds of Vocational Rehab-<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
may be spent to improve the dental health of clients; Money<br />
ilitation<br />
be spent to examine and treat a client, including supplying dentures.<br />
may<br />
this service can be provided only those who meet all the<br />
Obviously<br />
eligibility requirements for services.<br />
iii
Programs<br />
The Aging<br />
a 1966 report of the Administration on Aging of the U. S.<br />
In<br />
of Health, Education, and Welfare, these facts about the<br />
Department<br />
population of older Americans appear:<br />
in every ii persons in the United States is aged 65<br />
One<br />
over a total of 18-1/2 million men and women. This<br />
or<br />
exceeds the total population of the 20 smallest<br />
number<br />
states.<br />
this century, the percentage of the United States<br />
In<br />
aged 65 and over more than doubled (from<br />
population<br />
in 1900 to 9.4% in 1965), while the number increased<br />
4.1%<br />
(from 3 million to more than 18 million.)<br />
six-fold<br />
outlive men. There are about 129 older women per<br />
Women<br />
older men. Life expectancy at birth is 73.7 years<br />
i00<br />
females and 66.9 for males. Life expectancy for<br />
for<br />
is still increasing faster than for men.<br />
women<br />
out of every i0 persons 65 or over live in the<br />
Three<br />
most populous states--New York, California, Penn-<br />
four<br />
and Illinois--each of which has more than one<br />
sylvania,<br />
million.<br />
the next 20 years, the older population of the<br />
During<br />
States is expected to increase almost 40 percent<br />
United<br />
to 25 million people.<br />
Washington State there are about 300,000 people aged 65<br />
In<br />
older, about i0 percent of the population. In 1975, it is expected<br />
and<br />
there will be more than 350,000 of these people, according to the<br />
that<br />
and Community Affairs Agency. The proportion of the State of<br />
Planning<br />
population which is age 65 and over is approximately what<br />
Washington's<br />
is in the United States as a whole.<br />
it<br />
of our rural counties are becoming retirement havens<br />
Many<br />
the elderly. With this group come special problems. Great numbers<br />
for<br />
the elderly are now in hospitals and nursing homes. Many wait out<br />
of<br />
remaining years inactive, lonely, impoverished, bitter. One<br />
their<br />
solution to the problems of some of these elderly people was<br />
possible<br />
in a column by Sylvia Porter which was published in the SEATTLE<br />
provided<br />
POST-INTELLIGENCER, August 21, 1968. It is quoted in full as follows:<br />
this era, Old Age is a Long Time. If you have enough<br />
In<br />
absorbing interests and goodhealth, the 20 to 30<br />
money,<br />
even 40 years of retirement--voluntary or involuntary--<br />
or<br />
be-pleasant and rewarding. But if you are poor, have<br />
can<br />
112
had the chance to develop interests and have under-<br />
never<br />
your health through decades of neglect, the older<br />
mined<br />
years can be unadulterated Hell.<br />
shouldn't there be a "Late Start" program designed to<br />
Why<br />
the older person live to the end in proper dignity--<br />
help<br />
as the successful "Head. Start" proect is designed to<br />
just<br />
the child of poverty get a proper beginning?<br />
help<br />
definitely should be, says Genevieve Blatt, Assistant<br />
There<br />
of the Office of Economic Opportunity in Washington,<br />
Director<br />
she argues "it could be set up easily in many communities<br />
and<br />
costing a great deal of money." It's a fascinating<br />
without<br />
which you could adapt right now in your own neigh-<br />
concept<br />
at a minimum cost--if you have the needed enthusiasm<br />
borhood<br />
and cooperation of your neighbors and community leaders.<br />
fundamental point is that our older poor are the most<br />
The<br />
of all groups in our society. They never<br />
"disadvantaged"<br />
the advantage of Head Start now available for poor<br />
had<br />
they never received the training now provided<br />
children;<br />
teen-agers throughNeighborhood Youth or Job Corps; they<br />
for<br />
had the chance for retraining now available for young<br />
never<br />
middle-aged workers through various programs.. So they<br />
and<br />
a long portion of their lives with the new burden of<br />
face<br />
age on top of the burden of poverty. If we can't give<br />
old<br />
a real start, saysMiss Blatt, we ought to be able to<br />
them<br />
give them a Late Start. Here is how it might work:<br />
limited number of men and women 25 or 30 who qualify<br />
A<br />
old and poor, would be. assembled in a neighborhood group.<br />
as<br />
definitions could be the qualifying age for Social<br />
The<br />
benefits (62 to 65) and the official income poverty<br />
Security<br />
($3,300 for a family of. four.) This would involve about<br />
line<br />
people.<br />
5,500,000<br />
coordinator, several instructors and aides would be neces-<br />
A<br />
Some or all might be volunteers (no cost); the meeting<br />
sary.<br />
could be any school room or hall (perhaps also<br />
facilities<br />
needed supplies and health facilities might be obtained<br />
free);<br />
through existing channels (free too.)<br />
group would be. given thorough physicals. Since most<br />
The<br />
be entitled to full Medicare benefits and the services<br />
would<br />
of neighborhood health centers, costs should be minimal.<br />
nutritious meal would be served each day. It could be<br />
A<br />
mainly from surplus foods by volunteers or a regular<br />
prepared<br />
school staff. The cost could be 40 Cents per day per person.<br />
courses might be given in morning, afternoon or<br />
Training<br />
sessions of three hours each, tailored to the local,<br />
evening<br />
113
ethnic and other characteristics of the partici-<br />
economic,<br />
pants.<br />
the types of training could be: instruction in saving<br />
Among<br />
on buying; making the most of a limited income, avoid-<br />
money<br />
gyps, overcharges; how to select, prepare and serve food<br />
ing<br />
in basic reading and.writing; caft refreshers which<br />
courses<br />
lead to employment. (For instance, training a one-<br />
could<br />
typist in use of the electric typewriter or an ex-math<br />
time<br />
in the "new math." Or any older person might be<br />
teacher<br />
in art and music appreciation, making ceramics,<br />
instructed<br />
woodwork, metal work, knitting, crocheting, etc.)<br />
costs would depend on the extent of volunteer and com-<br />
The<br />
contributions. Older persons themselves should be<br />
munity<br />
primarily in charge.<br />
is just an outline and it's understandably fuzzy--but<br />
This<br />
warrants a test on a national scale to see how it would<br />
it<br />
and at what cost. For the objective is not fuzzy at<br />
work<br />
to give our older poor at least a "Late Start" in<br />
all:<br />
decent, dignified living. Dare you downgrade that?<br />
important study of rehabilitation potential was done in<br />
An<br />
State in the early 1960s. This study was concerned with<br />
Washington<br />
elderly in nursing homes and in general hospitals and was reported<br />
the<br />
in PROJECT REPORT, REHABILITATION EDUCATION SERVICE "...HELPING<br />
upon<br />
TO HELP THEMSELVES," June 1962. It was co-sponsored by the<br />
PEOPLE<br />
Departments of Health and Public Assistance and the Division of<br />
State<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation. A summary of the project is quoted:<br />
Summary<br />
purpose of the Rehabilitation Education Service Project<br />
The<br />
to demonstrate the effectiveness of a multi-disciplinary<br />
was<br />
teaching service for nursing home personnel.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
demonstration wascarried out in licensed nursing homes<br />
The<br />
the State of Washington by an experienced staff who were<br />
in<br />
to teach rehabilitative techniques and procedures.<br />
qualified<br />
teaching program consisted of classroom instruction and<br />
This<br />
for nursing home personnel followed by teach-<br />
demonstration<br />
the staff how to put into practice what they had.been<br />
ing<br />
in class as they gave direct care to patients.<br />
taught<br />
Project was financed by grant funds from the Office of<br />
The<br />
Rehabilitation and appropriately matched by the<br />
Vocational<br />
sponsoring agencies, the Washington State Department<br />
three<br />
Health, the State Department of Public Assistance, and<br />
of<br />
State Board for Vocational Education Division of Voca-<br />
the<br />
Rehabilitation. This statewide Project was approved<br />
tional<br />
for a three-year period.<br />
114
program was carried out under the administration and<br />
The<br />
of a coordinator who was responsible for medical<br />
supervision<br />
to the chief of the Division of Adult Health of<br />
direction<br />
State Department of Health and generally responsible to<br />
the<br />
three sponsoring agencies. In addition to the coordin-<br />
the<br />
and secretary, the staff included three nurses, an<br />
ator<br />
therapist, a physical therapist, a social worker,<br />
occupational<br />
a vocational counselor. Serving as consultants to the<br />
and<br />
and the nursing home staff were physiatrists, psychia-.<br />
team<br />
nutritionists, speech therapists, a hearing aid consul<br />
trists,<br />
and other specialists as medically determined to be<br />
tant,<br />
in considering the total needs of a patient in the<br />
necessary<br />
for rehabilitation. Specialists on the staff of spon-<br />
plan<br />
agencies were available as needed and requested.<br />
soring<br />
nursing homes were selected for the demonstration,<br />
Twelve<br />
one chronic disease unit of a general hospital.<br />
including<br />
ranged in capacity from l0 to 270 beds, and included<br />
These<br />
non-profit and proprietary facilities. The team spent<br />
both<br />
to ten weeks in each home in order to conduct the<br />
eight<br />
and demonstration. Three educational programs,<br />
teaching<br />
formal classes and clinical instruction, were<br />
including<br />
on simultaneously; one for nursing home personnel,<br />
carried<br />
for the activity director and volunteers participating<br />
one<br />
the activity program, and a third for public health nurses<br />
in<br />
and other professional people.<br />
at class by nursing home staff was in general<br />
Attendance<br />
However, in the majority of the demonstration<br />
satisfactory.<br />
the administrator and charge nurse did not attend<br />
homes<br />
either becauseof pressure of work in the home or<br />
regularly<br />
they failed to grasp the full significance of their<br />
because<br />
in classes. The licensed practical nurses<br />
participation<br />
nurse aides were the principal recipients of the teaching<br />
and<br />
It was difficult for the nursing home staff to<br />
program.<br />
that all parts of the demonstration--nursing care,<br />
recognize<br />
and activity program are indivisible in a total<br />
exercises<br />
rehabilitative plan for the patient.<br />
of the significant phases of the Project was the active<br />
One<br />
and interest of the community, local health and<br />
participation<br />
assistance departments. Through their sponsorship<br />
public<br />
have given their support to the continuation of the<br />
they<br />
program and extension of its services to other facilities.<br />
effort was made by the nursing home personnel and<br />
Consistent<br />
to interest the local physicians in the Project and to<br />
team<br />
their participation. Their interest was generally<br />
encourage<br />
until they observed their patients actively partici-<br />
limited<br />
It was noted, however, that some physicians increased<br />
pating.<br />
referrals to demonstration homes and that such homes<br />
their<br />
began to develop waiting lists for admission.<br />
115
insure objectivity the formal evaluation of the Project<br />
To<br />
conducted by two trained researchers from the University<br />
was<br />
Washington. The Project was evaluated from as many differ-<br />
of<br />
directions as possible. The administrators, charge nurses<br />
ent<br />
activity directors of the demonstration homes were each<br />
and<br />
interviewed. Local public health nurses who worked<br />
personally<br />
the RESP in their own counties and'the public assistance<br />
with<br />
who served patients in the demonstration homes<br />
caseworkers<br />
surveyed by questionnaires. Patient records did not<br />
were<br />
sufficient information for reliable evaluation of<br />
provide<br />
changes. Some of the indirect effects of the rehabili-<br />
patient<br />
program on the social system of the nursing home were<br />
tation<br />
through job satisfaction tests given to all employees<br />
measured<br />
and after the demonstration in the last five homes.<br />
before<br />
with respect to geriatric nursing and rehabilita-<br />
Attitudes<br />
philosophy of all staff members also were measured<br />
tive<br />
before and fter the demonstration.<br />
an average age of approximately 80 in nursing homes it<br />
With<br />
difficult to measure or evaluate gains in physical restora-<br />
is<br />
but the case studies graphically describe the mental and<br />
tion<br />
improvement of some patients from a state of total<br />
physical<br />
to varying degrees of independence in daily living.<br />
dependency<br />
results gained in a relatively short time have not only<br />
Such<br />
public interest but have inspired the nursing home<br />
created<br />
to take initiative in rehabilitative programs for<br />
personnel<br />
patients. Rehabilitative nursing care is being recog-<br />
their<br />
as necessary in an increasing number of nursing homes.<br />
nized<br />
Rehabilitation Education Service Project has shown that<br />
The<br />
chronically ill and disabled persons can be restored to<br />
many<br />
degrees of independence under the care and supervision<br />
varying<br />
an understanding nursing home staff and the application<br />
of<br />
rehabilitative techniquesin the day-by-day care of the<br />
of<br />
The Washington State Department of Health, with<br />
patients.<br />
firm belief that this type of program is significant in<br />
the<br />
development of higher standards of nursing care and<br />
the<br />
by the Washington State Nursing Home Association,<br />
encouraged<br />
made provision for a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation<br />
has<br />
on the staff of the Chronic Disease Section. This ser-<br />
team<br />
will be an ongoing part of the State Department of<br />
vice<br />
program available to all nursing homes and hospitals<br />
Health<br />
for chronically ill and disabled persons.<br />
caring<br />
work with the aging will increase, partly as<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
result of the increasing numbers of elderly people, partly because<br />
a<br />
the growing realization on the part of society that better provis-<br />
of<br />
should be made for the elderly. The provision for self-care<br />
ions<br />
is part of the Vocational Rehabilitation law in Washington<br />
services<br />
More can be done to help elderly people with independent living.<br />
State.<br />
116
Correctional Rehabilitation<br />
number of states have begun to have vocational rehabilita-<br />
A<br />
programs for people detained in prisons, reformatories and jails.<br />
tion<br />
was one of the earlier states to begin this effort. Mr. Cecil<br />
Washington<br />
as a Vocational Rehabilitation counselor w.orking in Spokane,<br />
Price,<br />
began this program in a formal way sveral years ago. How-<br />
Washington,<br />
there was only a modest expansion of the program until 1967.<br />
ever,<br />
Price was promoted to State Supervisor of Correctional Services.<br />
Mr.<br />
description of the correctional program, prepared in October, 1968,<br />
His<br />
is quoted below:<br />
Chapter 134, Laws of 1967, established a Division of<br />
When<br />
and Parole within the State Department of Public<br />
Probation<br />
effective July 1967, a cooperative agreement<br />
Institutions,<br />
that Department and the Division of Vocational<br />
between<br />
(DVR) had already been drawn between the<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
agencies.<br />
two<br />
1966 Dr. Garrett Heyns, Superintendent, Department of<br />
In<br />
made a strong request for the assignment of<br />
Institutions,<br />
of VocationalRehabilitation personnel, to work<br />
Division<br />
inmates of correctional institutions. The coopera-<br />
with<br />
agreement referred to above was developed that year<br />
tive<br />
signed September 15, 1966, by representatives of the<br />
and<br />
agencies. Provision was thus made for the development<br />
two<br />
a cooperative rehabilitation program within adult and<br />
of<br />
youth correctional facilities and for specialized<br />
older<br />
in some communities of the state.<br />
caseloads<br />
first assignment of avocational rehabilitation officer<br />
The<br />
a correctional institution rehabilitation unit occurred<br />
to<br />
April 1967. Other assignments were made through May 1968,<br />
in<br />
the total Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
bringing<br />
specializing in work with public offenders to<br />
personnel<br />
Eight of these are now working principally within<br />
eleven.<br />
but they follow their paroled clients into<br />
institutions,<br />
community within commuting distance of their work stations<br />
the<br />
transfer other clients to Correctional Rehabilitation<br />
and<br />
staff wherever this appears practical.<br />
Services<br />
year the greatest need for additional community, special-<br />
This<br />
in this endeavor appears to be in Tacoma and Vancouver.<br />
ists<br />
vocational rehabilitation officers in the general<br />
Several<br />
program accepted rather large numbers of<br />
rehabilitation<br />
offender clients in these communities. Vacant posi-<br />
public<br />
exist in Seattle and Chehalis, the latter to. serve<br />
tions<br />
referrals made by Green Hill School and Maple Lane School.<br />
of the eligible and ineligible clients referred from<br />
Most<br />
institutions have been diagnosed as having<br />
correctional<br />
disorders which have their source in cultural,<br />
behavioral<br />
environmental, educational, vocational, and other<br />
social,<br />
117
and result in severe limitations on work and commun-<br />
factors,<br />
adjustment. For these persons major changes in attitudes<br />
ity<br />
behavior come slowly and with great effort if they come<br />
and<br />
all.<br />
at<br />
member of the Division of Vocatioqal Rehabilitation staff<br />
Each<br />
to Correctional Rehabilitation Services strives to<br />
assigned<br />
out realistic and effective rehabilitation plans with<br />
work<br />
clients. That the plan be the client's plan (not that<br />
his<br />
the vocational rehabilitation officer) is critical whether<br />
of<br />
is incarcerated, paroled, or on probation. Services must<br />
he<br />
be purchased by the Division of Vocational Rehabilita-<br />
often<br />
tion.<br />
greatest need now appears to be to provide adequate field<br />
The<br />
community vocational rehabilitation officers to accept<br />
or<br />
service transfers from institutional rehabilitation units<br />
and<br />
to work with many more probationers and parolees, and<br />
and<br />
the probation and parole officers who are supervising<br />
with<br />
them.<br />
of our service figures for the month beginning Septem-<br />
Some<br />
i, 1968, may be of interest.<br />
ber<br />
Corrections Center<br />
Washington<br />
A 5<br />
Counselor<br />
IndividualCaseloadsTotal Caseloads<br />
B. 58<br />
Counselor<br />
C 114 177<br />
Counselor<br />
State Penitentiary<br />
Washington<br />
D 107<br />
Counselor<br />
E<br />
145<br />
Counselor<br />
F 138<br />
Counselor<br />
State Reformatory<br />
Washington<br />
G 33<br />
Counselor<br />
Counselor H 68<br />
TOTAL INSTITUTIONS CASELOAD 668<br />
Services, Probation and Parole Referrals<br />
Community<br />
I Seattle Area: 129<br />
Counselor<br />
J Spokane " 106<br />
Counselor<br />
K Spokane " 41<br />
Counselor<br />
TOTAL COMMUNITY CASELOAD 276<br />
GRAND TOTAL 944<br />
118<br />
390<br />
i01<br />
Total<br />
Caseloads
of services to public offenders is done on a<br />
Financing<br />
Party" basis. Contributions of the Department of<br />
"Third<br />
to the cooperative rehabilitation effort (such<br />
Institutions<br />
staff salaries, office space, equipment) are used as<br />
as<br />
funds to earn matching federal funds for services<br />
state<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. No state<br />
of<br />
money is involved. The size of the cooperative<br />
appropriated<br />
is related to the degree of support by the Depart-<br />
program<br />
of Institutions and the availability of federal funds<br />
ment<br />
third party financing. (End of statement by Mr. Price)<br />
for<br />
of the limitations of this program is that even now,<br />
One<br />
rehabilitation counselors are housed in each of the state correc-<br />
after<br />
institutions for adults and most of those for juveniles, there<br />
tional<br />
very few prisoners who are being served, and still fewer who have<br />
are<br />
been rehabilitated.<br />
wrote:<br />
In his 1968 book, THE CRIME OF PUNISHMENT, Karl Menninger<br />
is the system. This is the way we do it. A handful<br />
This<br />
men, relatively, have been caught and convicted and<br />
of<br />
to prison, while most offenders remain at large.<br />
consigned<br />
can we change the public image of all this, from the<br />
How<br />
police through the clumsy trial procedure, to<br />
handicapped<br />
great lockup where wickedness is confined and penitent<br />
the<br />
are beating their breasts? The prisons, whether new,<br />
souls<br />
steel and concrete warehouses or old, gloomy, grimy<br />
shiny<br />
are full of people--not, for the most part, vicious,<br />
lockups<br />
men who have done dreadful things, nor yet penitent,<br />
violent<br />
breast-beating men who wish they had not<br />
hand-wringing,<br />
the bank. They are full of men labeled rmiZ<br />
robbed<br />
they got caught at something and convicted of some-<br />
because<br />
forbidden. But they are mostly poor, inadequate,<br />
thing<br />
frustrated misfits--young failures, or life-<br />
incompetent,<br />
failures, offenders who could not even make a success<br />
long<br />
of crime!<br />
while an armyof men across the country tries to serve<br />
And<br />
interests and safety by turning the wheels of this<br />
our<br />
machine for the grinding up of a minority of the<br />
infernal<br />
offenders and administering to them the futile<br />
easily-caught<br />
of punishment, a horde of known but immune predatory<br />
ritual<br />
criminals grows fat and famous in front of our<br />
professional<br />
eyes.<br />
will likely be significant improvements in this situa-<br />
There<br />
in the time to come. This was decided early in the life of the<br />
tion<br />
Commission when it was voted that "the State has a special<br />
Planning<br />
to try to rehabilitate those who are wholly or partly<br />
responsibility<br />
dependent on it and/or one of its political subdivisions."<br />
119
October 18, 1968 a document was signed which was designed<br />
On<br />
help those people in correctional and other institutions. This<br />
to<br />
was described in the Winter Issue, 1968, Vocational Rehabili-<br />
document<br />
OUTLOOK, Vol. 5, No. i, as follows:<br />
tation<br />
greater numbers of individuals in state institutions<br />
Far<br />
expected to be better equipped to met the challenges<br />
are<br />
the outside world when they return to their communities<br />
of<br />
a result of a recent agreement signed by two state<br />
as<br />
agencies.<br />
agreement made by the Department of Institutions and<br />
The<br />
State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation calls for<br />
the<br />
rehabilitation agency to begin a program of services<br />
the<br />
each major area of the Department. A full-grown program<br />
in<br />
is the goal of the agreement.<br />
William R. Conte, Institutions chief, and E. M. Oliver,<br />
Dr.<br />
Rehabilitation Director, pointed out that the new<br />
State<br />
was developed as a result of a close-working<br />
program<br />
between the two state agencies over the last<br />
relationship<br />
two years.<br />
new effort will require additional highly trained<br />
The<br />
Full development of the program is dependent<br />
counselors.<br />
the recruitment of new personnel, with recruiting<br />
on<br />
staff having a high priority.<br />
trained<br />
of trained personnel will be undertaken and<br />
Promotions<br />
training programs for counselors and other needed<br />
special<br />
is planned. The undertaking will utilize Federal<br />
staff<br />
available to the State of Washington to match certain<br />
funds<br />
funds being used .in the rehabilitation of persons<br />
State<br />
the institutions.<br />
leaving<br />
of the two agencies will be directed toward build-<br />
Efforts<br />
an effective bridge for those leaving Institutions,<br />
ing<br />
the bridge designed to give such individuals needed<br />
with<br />
and help so they won't have to return to institu-<br />
direction<br />
Part of the bridge represents not only the growing<br />
tions.<br />
to extend institutional and .rehabilitation services,<br />
need<br />
it also represents the need for vocational education<br />
but<br />
and other services.<br />
re-education<br />
Conte noted that his department has five divisions which<br />
Dr.<br />
32 institutions, in addition to handling many<br />
operate<br />
community services.<br />
average daily resident population exceeds 12,000 in<br />
"The<br />
institutions" Dr. Conte said, "And the vast majority<br />
those<br />
those persons are vocationally handicapp.ed and in need<br />
of<br />
rehabilitation services.<br />
of<br />
120
than 6,000 persons of working age between 16 and 60<br />
"More<br />
discharged from our institutions annually and virtually<br />
are<br />
meet the criteria of physical or mental disability estab-<br />
all<br />
by the state vocational rehabilitation agency."<br />
lished<br />
Oliver stated that, "Our rehabilitation agency welcomes<br />
Mr.<br />
opportunity to work withDr. Conte Snd his staff in<br />
the<br />
carrying out this new effort."<br />
only will it be necessary to have an enormous expansion<br />
Not<br />
services in the state prisons and state reformatories; to complete<br />
of<br />
rehabilitation job it will be necessary that rehabilitation ser-<br />
the<br />
be provided those on probation and parole and those in city and<br />
vices<br />
county jails.<br />
his first poignant scene in WINTERSET, Maxwell Anderson's<br />
In<br />
speak about prison:<br />
characters<br />
Now look, Trock, look, what would the warden say to<br />
SHADOW.<br />
like that?<br />
talk<br />
May they die as I die! By God, what life they've<br />
TROCK.<br />
me they shall keep me well! I'ii have that out of them-<br />
left<br />
these pismires that walk like men!<br />
Because, look, chief, it's all against science and<br />
SHADOW.<br />
for you to get out and begin to cuss that way<br />
penology<br />
your prison vittles are out of you. Hell, you're<br />
before<br />
to leave the pen full of high thought, kind of<br />
supposed<br />
loving toward all mankind, ready-to kiss their<br />
noble-like,<br />
whatever parts they stick out toward you. Look<br />
feet--or<br />
at me!<br />
I see you. And even you may not live as long as<br />
TROCK.<br />
think. You think too many things are funny. Well,<br />
you<br />
laugh. But it's not so funny.<br />
Come on, Trock, you know me. Anything you say goes,<br />
SHADOW.<br />
give me leave.to kid a little.<br />
but<br />
Then laugh at somebody else! It's a lot safer!<br />
TROCK.<br />
soaked me once too often in that vat of oisoned<br />
They've<br />
they keep upstate to soak men in, and I'm rotten in-<br />
hell<br />
I'm all one liquid puke inside where I had lungs<br />
side,<br />
like yourself! And now they want to get me and stir<br />
once,<br />
in again--and that'd kill me--and that's fine for them.<br />
me<br />
Division of Research and Demonstration Grants of the<br />
The<br />
and Rehabilitation Service, Department Of Health, Education,<br />
Social<br />
Welfare, in their RESEARCH BRIEF of January 1969, has stated as<br />
and<br />
follows:<br />
121
three million serious crimes came to police attention<br />
Almost<br />
1965. This figure, however, is by no means complete, for<br />
in<br />
a study of 1,700 persons, 91 percent admitted to one or<br />
in<br />
of 49 offenses for which they might, if detected, have<br />
more<br />
jail or prison sentences. While the imprisoned<br />
received<br />
emerges as a generally inadequate and disadvantaged<br />
offender<br />
this cannot explain the full rnge of crime, much<br />
person,<br />
which is unreported and unsolved.<br />
of<br />
people commit a disproportionate share of all crimes,<br />
Young<br />
their numbers are growing faster than the total popula-<br />
and<br />
The 15 to 17 age group comprises only 5.4% of the<br />
tion.<br />
but accounts for almost 13% of all arrests.<br />
population<br />
this group will become a larger portion of the<br />
Tomorrow,<br />
population, bringing a corresponding possibility of<br />
total<br />
more crime. This is deeply disturbing not only to<br />
even.<br />
interested in conserving human resources but also<br />
those<br />
those trying to cope with a rising volume of crime.<br />
to treat offenders individually and justly, and how to<br />
How<br />
those social conditions in which crime flourishes,<br />
transform<br />
the two main problems in correctional rehabilitation.<br />
are<br />
has easy solutions. In recent (1968) Harris<br />
Neither<br />
of public and professional attitudes toward crime<br />
Surveys<br />
corrections, both groups agreed that rehabilitation to<br />
and<br />
the offender a productive citizen should be our main<br />
make<br />
The public felt that offenders need more help after<br />
goal.<br />
that community acceptance is a major problem, but<br />
release,<br />
unwilling to pay higher taxes for better correctional<br />
were<br />
unreceptive to Halfway Houses for .released offen-<br />
programs,<br />
in their own neighborhoods, and unenthusiastic about<br />
ders<br />
in correctional work for their own children. Cor-<br />
careers<br />
workers felt there must be more community involve-<br />
rectional<br />
if programs are to be effective, but noted that lack<br />
ment<br />
community acceptance, trained personnel, and adequate<br />
-of<br />
funds are three major hurdles facing such programs.<br />
description of the present situation in prisons was dis-<br />
A<br />
in an article by Bruce Jackson in the NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE<br />
cussed<br />
September 2, 1968 entitled, "Our Prisons are Criminal 'Not one<br />
of<br />
them really does its job--and the worst of them practice old-<br />
of<br />
fashioned barbarity.'" Mr. Jackson stated that:<br />
has the longest prison sentences in the West, yet<br />
America<br />
only condition long sentencesdemonstrably cure is<br />
the<br />
heterosexuality.<br />
Further, he said:<br />
countries such as Denmark and Sweden have immensely<br />
Other<br />
prison education. Yet in the United States with<br />
improved<br />
122
its fancy schools and its splendid mass media, with all<br />
all<br />
technology and experts prison education barely makes<br />
its<br />
for the basic reading and writing skills the inmate never<br />
up<br />
on the outside. England s about to legalize conjugal<br />
got<br />
rights for married inmate men, because it realizes<br />
visiting<br />
there is much social value in keeping an inmate's<br />
that<br />
together. But in this country eople trying to make<br />
family<br />
prison experience more socally beneficial in almost any<br />
the<br />
way are accused of "coddling" criminals.<br />
nature of the myopia, though disheartening, is not hard<br />
The<br />
determine. With rare exceptions our approach to the<br />
to<br />
of crime and correction is an approach to the symptom<br />
problem<br />
than the cure.<br />
rather<br />
we should be honest with ourselves; if what we want<br />
Maybe<br />
vengeance, we've got pretty good models going in several<br />
is<br />
right now. If what we want is to make the streets<br />
places<br />
our property more secure, our nights more tranquil,<br />
safer,<br />
we want to help those people (and at the same time our-<br />
if<br />
we had best redefine what those places with their<br />
selves),<br />
their wires, their guns and their, bars are required<br />
walls,<br />
do.<br />
to<br />
following statement by Donald R. Johns, Ph.D., was pre-<br />
The<br />
for his employer, the Department of Institutions. Dr. Johns<br />
pared<br />
served as a task force chairman for the Planning Commission<br />
visits to prisoners have long been a topic, of consider-<br />
Marital<br />
interest in the United States, although frankly to date<br />
able<br />
is mostly talk. Moreover there seems to be more such<br />
it<br />
among persons who observe prisons than there is among<br />
talk<br />
those who operate them.<br />
Alternatives t__o Conjugal Visitin<br />
may as well prejudice the issue early in the discussion.<br />
One<br />
or not there Bhoud be conjugal visits it seems quite<br />
Whether<br />
that there w t be such visits in most American<br />
clear<br />
in the near future. There are several reasons, and<br />
prisons<br />
may be useful to present these as "objectively" as possible,<br />
it<br />
that some of these reasons are based more on opinions<br />
granting<br />
are strongly held. On what basis, then, are "conjugal<br />
which<br />
unlikely?<br />
programs"<br />
visits, realistically,.can serve only those pris-<br />
Such<br />
with intact marriages. This represents, of<br />
oners<br />
a very partial solution to the general problem<br />
course,<br />
sexuality in confinement. The effect on prison<br />
of<br />
specifically probably would be negligible,<br />
homosexuality<br />
because "well-married" prisoners are in the<br />
both<br />
123
and because they are comparatively unlikely<br />
minority<br />
be much involved in the prison's "serious" homo-<br />
to<br />
sexual activities.<br />
facilities for such visits are lacking<br />
Appropriate<br />
almost all prison settings. Constructing and staff-<br />
in<br />
these facilities would necessarily take its place<br />
ing<br />
the various needs Which compete for priority<br />
among<br />
It is not surprising that needed facilities<br />
attention.<br />
education, training, medical care, and so forth,<br />
for<br />
"win out" in this competition. In this<br />
consistently<br />
there are some values which may be more cherished<br />
sense,<br />
in the American scene than is motherhood!<br />
practical problems in administration are several.<br />
The<br />
concerns, common-law marriages, potential<br />
Security<br />
jealousies, and.possible coercive use by<br />
prisoner<br />
of the power to grant or deny such visits are<br />
staff<br />
That there are such problems, and that con-<br />
examples.<br />
staff time might become committed to their<br />
siderable<br />
militates against the program. An under-<br />
management<br />
if regretable, reaction would be "we have<br />
standable,<br />
enough problems on our hands already."<br />
support for marital visits is meager.<br />
Administrative<br />
survey* found less than i0 percent of the 73 prison<br />
One<br />
surveyed to be in favor of conjugal visits.<br />
wardens<br />
percent of those polled, and 56 percent of those<br />
Forty<br />
answered were opposed. More than half of those<br />
who<br />
were non-committal in one way or another (did not<br />
polled<br />
were undecided, non-committal, or would refer<br />
respond,<br />
question to "higher administration"). Successful<br />
the<br />
generally require consider.ably stronger admin-<br />
programs<br />
support than is implied by these figures.<br />
istrative<br />
undocumented, but obvious problem arises with respect<br />
An<br />
"climate." The frankly sexual visit, in this culture,<br />
to<br />
unmistakably degrading connotations. There would<br />
has<br />
to be serious question whether conjugal visits<br />
seem<br />
escape the imagery and feeling-tone implied. It<br />
could<br />
be expected, for example, that many wiveswould<br />
might<br />
intense conflict between the desire to be<br />
experience<br />
their husbands and a sense of cheapness or baseness<br />
with<br />
making such openly sexual visits. Since women are<br />
in<br />
infrequently concerned about whether their husbands<br />
not<br />
are interested in them only for sex, this "hang-up"<br />
Balogh, Joseph K. Conjugal Visitations i__n_nPrisons: A Sociological<br />
*<br />
In FEDERAL PROBATION, September 1964<br />
Perspective.<br />
124
sometimes exacerbate marital problems while<br />
might<br />
to relieve them. To the extent that this<br />
attempting<br />
a real problem, the conjugal visit presents the<br />
is<br />
with a bad choice. If there are ways of pro-<br />
couple<br />
for sexual needs within the context of a more<br />
viding<br />
atmosphere, then those alternatives should be<br />
natural<br />
given careful attention..<br />
The possibility of increasing the numbers of children<br />
6,<br />
to "inadequate families" and supported by public<br />
born<br />
is obvious, and presumably would militate<br />
welfare<br />
community support for such changes in public<br />
against<br />
It would simply be easier, for example, to<br />
policy.<br />
the issue than it would be to wrestle through<br />
neglect<br />
questions potentially involved (e.g., mandatory<br />
the<br />
as a pre-condition of such visits as one<br />
birth-control<br />
solution to the problem ofincreased public dependency).<br />
state the case of conjugal .visits more positively, it<br />
To<br />
be predicted that implementation of such "programs"<br />
might<br />
might be expected when:<br />
There are facilities available which could be converted<br />
io<br />
and not too expensively to such use;<br />
satisfactorily<br />
interest in such a program is reasonably<br />
Administrative<br />
high;<br />
to such programs is not strong or not actively<br />
Opposition<br />
organized;<br />
practical problems can be carefully recognized,<br />
The<br />
for, and managed.<br />
planned<br />
Variations on a Theme TheFamilyVisit<br />
usual image of conjugal visiting, at least in this coun-<br />
The<br />
is probably the little shack on the trustee-farms of<br />
try,<br />
Mississippi prison, with visits regulated by the local<br />
the<br />
A significant departure from this image has been<br />
guards.<br />
at the California State Prison at Tehachapi. Here<br />
developed<br />
previously occupied by staff, is set up for the<br />
housing<br />
to visit "eligible" inmates during the pre-release<br />
family<br />
of their sentence. This situation, for a two or three<br />
phase<br />
period, more closely replicates the full family setting.<br />
day<br />
for cooking and recreation are provided, and the<br />
Facilities<br />
are included. Initial experience with this arrange-<br />
children<br />
has been favorable, rportedly, and it would seem to<br />
ment<br />
many of the objections cited above. The remaining<br />
avoid<br />
are obvious: it serves only a minority; it is<br />
limitations<br />
only during a quite limited portion of the prison-<br />
available<br />
sentence; it is probably realistically feasible only<br />
er's<br />
125
fairly unique circumstances (e.g., vacated staff<br />
under<br />
and it does not serve as a vehicle for bringing<br />
housing);<br />
prisoner into the community in other important ways<br />
the<br />
for on-thespot job interviews). It is, in short,<br />
(e.g.,<br />
what it claims to be: one step toward smoothing, the<br />
only<br />
to community living.<br />
transitional<br />
Authorized Leave as a More Flexible Alternative<br />
visits, similar to the week-end pass used by military<br />
Home<br />
has been suggested as an obvious alternative.*<br />
installations,<br />
The potential advantages of such a system are several:<br />
Their use can be more flexible and serve more objectives<br />
io<br />
can conjugal visits at prison. Employment inter-<br />
than<br />
business matters, experimental "parole" (testing<br />
views,<br />
for brief periods whether a parole plan is adequate),<br />
out<br />
and funeral visits, planned family outings,<br />
hospital<br />
training assignments are some of the more obvious<br />
and<br />
that could be pursued under the structure<br />
activities<br />
such a program. A single administrative policy and<br />
of<br />
of procedures could be developed to cover all<br />
set<br />
under which a prisoner should be placed<br />
circumstances<br />
on authorized leave status, streamlining administration.<br />
facilities and resources could be utilized<br />
Existing<br />
fully in lieu of building, staffing, equipping,<br />
more<br />
supply of certain institutional programs. For<br />
and<br />
certain pre-release activities (e.g., mock<br />
example,<br />
"dry run" job interviews) could be replaced by<br />
or<br />
"real" experience. With respect to family<br />
direct<br />
the family's home or other existing accommo-<br />
visits,<br />
(e.g., apartments, motels) could be used rather<br />
dations<br />
than constructing special facilities for family visits.<br />
The fuller and more natural context of family week-end<br />
3,<br />
be provided for marital visits as such. Particu-<br />
would<br />
visits involving children would be more appro-<br />
larly,<br />
and more satisfying than occurs when children<br />
priate<br />
go to see their father at the prison. There are no<br />
It is difficult to know whom to credit for this idea, but<br />
*<br />
should be acknowledged clearly that this writer is far<br />
it<br />
the first to have thought of it. By 1958 there were<br />
from<br />
programs for selected categories of prisoners<br />
home-leave<br />
England, Wales, North Ireland, Scotland, Denmark,<br />
in<br />
Germany, Greece, and Sweden (see Cavan, R.S.,<br />
Switzerland,<br />
Zemans, E. S., Marital Relationships of Prisoners i__n<br />
and<br />
Countries. In JRNL OF CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINOLOGY<br />
2--8<br />
AND POLICE SCIENCE Vol. 49, No 2, p. 135, 1958.<br />
126
in prison for example in which fathers<br />
accommodations<br />
actually play with their children, much less take<br />
can<br />
on an outing or otherwise give to them. The child<br />
them<br />
only the adult situation where there is opportunity<br />
meets<br />
for talk. The medium of exchange between parents<br />
only<br />
young children, of course, is Rot talk, but is<br />
and<br />
activity, including play. Virtually no "father-<br />
shared<br />
is possible in the prison visit unless it is to<br />
ing"<br />
tell the restless child to sit still.<br />
of adjustment under reduced supervision would be<br />
Tests<br />
before the individual is fully released.<br />
practical<br />
areas of difficulty are identified (e.g., what to<br />
When<br />
on Saturday night) they can be worked with before<br />
do<br />
the individual leaves major supervision.<br />
programs would militate against the general trend<br />
Such<br />
from family consolidation.<br />
away<br />
administrative tasks would be easier than is<br />
Certain<br />
case when visitors go to the prison (particularly,<br />
the<br />
intimate visits than are allowable in the open<br />
more<br />
room). For example, it is less objectionable<br />
visiting<br />
"shake down" aprisoner returning to prison from<br />
to<br />
than it is to search thoroughly a member of his<br />
leave<br />
family who comes to visit.<br />
it be said that only the gains and none of the risks<br />
Lest<br />
discussed by those who advocate various programs, or<br />
are<br />
risks go unrecognized in planning, the potential hazards<br />
lest<br />
disadvantages of authorized leave should be identified.<br />
or<br />
are familiar, however, and are the same hazards which<br />
They<br />
faces at the time of release. They are also the<br />
society<br />
which society faces with itself--with its members<br />
hazards<br />
are not confined. These include:<br />
who<br />
Risk of legal offenses during the individual's period<br />
l.<br />
freedom from institutional surveillance. These<br />
of<br />
should be monitored by careful selection of<br />
risks<br />
and by structuring the situation to which<br />
candidates,<br />
is released (e.g., to be under family surveillance<br />
he<br />
all times).<br />
at<br />
of absconding from supervision. These risks, too,<br />
Risk<br />
the same risk on release to parole, should be<br />
like<br />
by selection and family-community (e.g.,<br />
monitored<br />
officer) surveillance.<br />
parole<br />
127
of inappropriate conduct short of a significant<br />
Risk<br />
offense. With careful screening, these comprise<br />
legal<br />
of the risks--that the individual may get drunk,<br />
most<br />
become involved in some other "nuisance offense"<br />
or<br />
is normally tolerated in the case of citizens who<br />
which<br />
not under institutional care. Although they are<br />
are<br />
visible, so their misconduct does not often<br />
highly<br />
public notice, indications are that selected<br />
escape<br />
"visitors" to the community ae less likely<br />
institution<br />
comprise a public nuisance than are many citizens<br />
to<br />
at-large.<br />
that additional children might be born to problem<br />
Risk<br />
With appropriate counseling (and probably<br />
families."<br />
most cases without it) pregnancies arising from<br />
in<br />
visits should be predicted as low. Most persons<br />
family<br />
for example that this. would be no time to<br />
recognize,<br />
to the family and would simply behave accordingly.<br />
add<br />
normal access to contraceptive methods, and with<br />
With<br />
if necessary, to family-planning counsel, no<br />
access,<br />
increase in such childrenneed be expected.<br />
substantial<br />
the same time, of course, conception remains a<br />
At<br />
of personal choice and personal responsibility<br />
question<br />
all citizens, subject only to advice and education.<br />
for<br />
government is prepared to intervene more strongly<br />
Unless<br />
"population control" generally, these same standards<br />
in<br />
apply to all citizens. To retain an individual<br />
should<br />
prison simply to prevent the birth of children is<br />
in<br />
clearly not the intent of constitutio.nal law.<br />
Place of Authorized Leave in the<br />
The<br />
CorrectionalProcess<br />
Overall<br />
is becoming increasingly clear that the nation's past<br />
It<br />
present system of criminal justice is not fulfilling its<br />
and<br />
mandate, particularly with respect to the long-<br />
appointed<br />
protection of citizens from fellow-citizens. The vast<br />
range<br />
of the crime problem is that of repeated "minor"<br />
majority<br />
(misdemeanors and lessor felonies) for which the rather<br />
crimes<br />
dictum "lock them up and throw away the key" is simply<br />
popular<br />
under any system of "penalties to fit the crime."<br />
unworkable<br />
predominant contemporary pattern is a life-history of<br />
The<br />
crimes and petty penalties, which seem in time to<br />
petty<br />
each other as night follows day. Extending the penal-<br />
follow<br />
introduces a measure of increased short-term safety, but<br />
ties<br />
least in many obvious cases at the cost of increased long-<br />
at<br />
danger. Like the snake-pit philosophy of mental hospitals<br />
term<br />
scant quarter-century ago, the prison all too often still<br />
a<br />
its own dark prophesy of hopelessness. Also like<br />
fulfills<br />
mental hospital, "salvation" must come, no doubt, from<br />
the<br />
source other than variations in custodial care. For<br />
some<br />
128
hospitals, the "breakthrough" was threefold: (i) new<br />
the<br />
(2) the "open door" policy, and (3) more and better<br />
drugs,<br />
(and facilities and materials) to work appropriately<br />
staff<br />
patients.<br />
with<br />
comparatively fewer prisoners than mental patients<br />
Since<br />
likely to benefit substantially fro the "new drugs,"<br />
seem<br />
more visable benefits on the horizon for corrections<br />
the<br />
come in the form of (i) the "open door" or some<br />
should<br />
and (2) increased-improved staff-treatment methods.<br />
variant(s),<br />
would be difficult to declare which of these is to be the<br />
It<br />
important. Certainly in the state hospital experience,<br />
more<br />
latter could not have accomplished its task without the<br />
the<br />
It is less clear whether the former might have been<br />
former.<br />
without much of the latter. That is, the open door<br />
enough<br />
critical; it is harder to determine the specific benefits<br />
was<br />
staff and treatment efforts beyond those rather directly<br />
of<br />
attributable to .drugs, although benefits there clearly were.<br />
"open door" has, in one sense, always been a part of<br />
The<br />
operations. Except in that minority of offenses which<br />
prison<br />
extremely long sentences, the "client" can look forward<br />
yield<br />
release. And it is this, prison administrators agree,<br />
to<br />
than anything else, that creates "motivation,,' conformity,<br />
more<br />
hope. The "open door" in the sense of in-and-out-in-and-<br />
and<br />
for week-ends, home visits, and partial hospitalization<br />
out,<br />
is still almost unknown in prison programs. And<br />
however,<br />
is quite clear that such programs could be extremely use-<br />
it<br />
in the rehabilitation of many persons who are sent to<br />
ful<br />
rather than to a mental hospital. Authorized leave<br />
prison<br />
provide the administrative machinery for accomplishing<br />
could<br />
these improvements in correctional programming.<br />
are probably two main deterrents to the development of<br />
There<br />
policies and practices. First, most penalties in current<br />
such<br />
are measured in confinement-time, and there is an<br />
practice<br />
that this confinement will be continuous until<br />
expectation<br />
Second, there is a general sense that all offenders<br />
parole.<br />
dangerous at the time of conviction, and (hopefully)<br />
are<br />
become safe-to-be-at-large as their sentence moves<br />
gradually<br />
expiration. There is a general confidence, for example,<br />
toward<br />
the "pre-release" period. We expect that, if the person<br />
in<br />
about to be released, he must have become safe.<br />
is<br />
fact is that some of the persons convicted (statistical<br />
The<br />
indicate about forty percent who can be identified)<br />
studies<br />
safe-to-be-at-large throughout their confinement, or<br />
are<br />
be released occasionally without undue risk. It is for<br />
could<br />
forty percent or more that authorized leave could serve<br />
this<br />
a rehabilitative tool throughout their confinement. With<br />
as<br />
nearly one hundred percent, authorized leavewould appear<br />
129
helpful during the pre-release phase. For those<br />
potentially<br />
who have intact marriages, the same policy and<br />
prisoners<br />
would serve as a superior alternative to conjugal<br />
procedures<br />
(End of Dr. John's statement)<br />
visits.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECONDS:<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation work with the<br />
That<br />
law enforcement and other community resources in the<br />
courts,<br />
of rehabilitation programs for offenders and<br />
development<br />
offenders, and that those in need of vocational re-<br />
potential<br />
habi litation service8 8hould be served.<br />
there should be an expansion of services to the persons<br />
That<br />
prisons and other correctional institutions so that by<br />
in<br />
all prisoners below the age of 60 would be referred<br />
1975<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation routinely, with later screen-<br />
to<br />
to exclude those net feasible for vocational rehabili-<br />
ing<br />
services.<br />
tation<br />
Economic Opportunity Programs<br />
of the fastest growing areas in government is in mann<br />
One<br />
programs. However, there has been a greater increase in legis<br />
power<br />
authorizing new programs than there has been an increase in<br />
lation<br />
to pay for the programs. The then President of the United<br />
funding<br />
Lyndon B. Johnson, in 1968 made an agreement with Congress<br />
States,<br />
reduce the federal budget for civilian programs by $6 billion.<br />
to<br />
devastating cut was made principally in the manpower programs.<br />
This<br />
rehabilitation, education, health, welfare, and other<br />
Vocational<br />
were also crippled. It is likely to be years before the<br />
programs<br />
made by this cut will have healed. Perhaps a manifestation<br />
wounds<br />
the cut was the rioting which tore through our cities in the recent<br />
of<br />
Disadvantaged people were promised greatly improved govern-<br />
summer.<br />
services. When Federal budgetary restrictions reduced the<br />
mental<br />
the demonstrations and attacks began. Young militant<br />
programs<br />
people fouled their own nests, burned their own neighbor-<br />
aggrieved<br />
found that the dead were so often their own brothers.<br />
hoods,<br />
Washington State energetic efforts by many governmental<br />
In<br />
at many levels have been directed to help relieve the poverty<br />
officials<br />
suffering of the disadvantaged. The state government, particularly,<br />
and<br />
been in the forefront in this respect, and activity has not been<br />
has<br />
only to agencies with special responsibilities in this area.<br />
limited<br />
would expect, for example, that the Board Against Discrimination<br />
We<br />
the Office of Economic Opportunity would work vigorously to help<br />
and<br />
races in the state. Most. other states, however have not<br />
minority<br />
comparable activity on the part of high government officials<br />
shown<br />
help the minorities, the disadvantaged, and the handicapped.<br />
to<br />
130
the efforts of these and other governmental officials, the<br />
Through<br />
of Washington is projecting an image of an aggressive, humane,<br />
State<br />
educated people striving for law and order with justice.<br />
THE COISSION RECOENDS:<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitatio in its involve-<br />
That<br />
in community action planning for services in poor neigh-<br />
ment<br />
arrange for poor people themselves to participate<br />
borhoods,<br />
the planning.<br />
in<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation work with<br />
That<br />
agencies to find means of delivering vocational<br />
other<br />
and educational services in the rural areas<br />
rehabilitation<br />
Washington.<br />
of<br />
WASHINGTON APATHY OR ACTION? a 1968 report of<br />
URBAN<br />
Governor's Advisory Council on Urban Affairs, A. Ludlow Kramer,<br />
the<br />
Secretary of State, Chairman, contains the following statement:<br />
a person makes a living is a vital determinant of his<br />
How<br />
and social well-being. Almost every .person<br />
individual<br />
the need to contribute to his own welfare through<br />
feels<br />
own efforts. A viable society must provide an oppor-<br />
his<br />
tunity for every person to fulfill this basic need.<br />
problems have drastic social impact. Much of<br />
Employment<br />
alienation of a minority person, for example, is<br />
the<br />
by the nature of his work. Those that are forced<br />
caused<br />
of employment or denied participation in progressive,<br />
out<br />
jobs feel a resentment toward society that has<br />
meaningful<br />
itself in racial violence.<br />
manifested<br />
male members ofa family who cannot adequately support<br />
Those<br />
families feel a sense of shame and inadequacy that<br />
.their<br />
some to leave their homes. Consequently, their<br />
causes<br />
grow up without fathers and, more often than not<br />
children<br />
into the.same cycle of unemployment, frustration<br />
graduate<br />
desertion.<br />
and<br />
not only provide security in the present to the indivi-<br />
Jobs<br />
they insure the future for society as well. Some of<br />
dual,<br />
most vital growth services--health care, education,<br />
the<br />
planning, and administration of all types--requir<br />
housing,<br />
increases in manpower. Not only do people need<br />
tremendous<br />
but the job market needs people. The greatest social<br />
jobs,<br />
benefit will result from bringing these two together.<br />
there have been measurable gains in the personal<br />
Although<br />
of many of our state's citizens, the conditions of<br />
income<br />
of our citizens--particularly many Blacks, Mexican-<br />
many<br />
and American Indians--is one of deprivation and<br />
Americans,<br />
hopelessness,<br />
131
z<br />
132<br />
..i.
eason for this cond.i..t.i.on lies in three a.reas that need<br />
The<br />
concentrated attackunemployment, underemployment, and<br />
a<br />
lack of entrepreneurial skills.<br />
is the most obvious of the three, and the<br />
Underemployment<br />
that the Federal government and private enterprise<br />
one<br />
the nation have begun to attack jointly. The<br />
throughout<br />
is not the lack of jobs. We have a rapidly<br />
problem<br />
economy in Washington and new jobs are opening<br />
expanding<br />
than employers can fill them.<br />
faster<br />
acute problem is that unemployment tends to be concen-<br />
An<br />
instead of spread throughout the community. In<br />
trated,<br />
unemployment concentrates in core city areas<br />
Washington,<br />
in isolated rural areas. The unemployed usually live<br />
and<br />
these areas, and their inability to pay for innovative<br />
in<br />
in their community schools, adequate housing and<br />
programs<br />
governmental services tends to perpetuate unem-<br />
sufficient<br />
ployment.<br />
concentration adds to the problem in several ways, For<br />
The<br />
those on relief in the Central Area of Seattle<br />
instance,<br />
find Jobs in the rapidly expanding job market in<br />
might<br />
but they can neither afford to move to Everett<br />
Everett,<br />
buy available housing if they could get there. These<br />
nor<br />
cannot support the special levies necessary for their<br />
areas<br />
to develop programs designed to resolve the unique<br />
schools<br />
of problems of the community's children, so<br />
configuration<br />
young grow up untrained and, consequently, unable to<br />
the<br />
a job. The inability to get to a health professional,<br />
hold<br />
fact that none live nearby, means that many people<br />
the<br />
physically hampered in their ability to work.<br />
become<br />
those places where.the unemployed can get jobs, artificial<br />
In<br />
and discrimination by employers can prevent these<br />
.standards<br />
from being employed. Lack of adequate education or<br />
people<br />
skills can pose a barrier. Legal problems, like<br />
vocational<br />
threat of garnishment and the inability to be eligible<br />
the<br />
bonding, also hinder the employment of the unemployed.<br />
for<br />
need for supervision for their children keeps many<br />
The<br />
now receiving welfare payments from working or<br />
mothers<br />
engaging in training programs.<br />
akin to the problem of unemployment, and almost<br />
Closely<br />
present in the same area, is the problem of underem-<br />
always<br />
Strictly defined, underemployment is a part-time<br />
ployment.<br />
or a full-time job that pays less than $3,000 a year.<br />
job<br />
major problem of underemployment is that it discourages<br />
One<br />
employment. Our system of taking a dollar of welfare<br />
full<br />
every dollar of income discourages people on welfare<br />
for<br />
taking any type of a part-time job. The fact that many<br />
from<br />
of the unemployed can only look forward to being underemployed<br />
133
the effort it takes to find a job. They said<br />
discourages<br />
us, "Why fight discrimination, lack of training, trans-<br />
to<br />
away from home, and the physical effort involved<br />
portation<br />
a mere $3,000 a year?"<br />
for<br />
a broader definition, underemployment becomes an even<br />
In<br />
critical problem. If we define underemployment as<br />
more<br />
at a job below one's apparent potential capability,<br />
working<br />
becomes a problem of all society, not just those of low<br />
it<br />
A free enterprise system demands a commitment to<br />
income.<br />
world of work, and if such a system is to flourish it<br />
the<br />
provide an opportunity for individuals to fulfill<br />
must<br />
by working within it. Thus, make-work programs,<br />
themselves<br />
in 1938 or 1968 are not the answer. Our society<br />
whether<br />
grave domestic problems involving population, unem-<br />
faces<br />
education, health, housing, and the physical en-<br />
ployment,<br />
The unemployed and the underemployed must share<br />
vironment.<br />
meeting those challenges, instead of being part of the<br />
in<br />
challenge.<br />
third area of the job problem, and one related both<br />
The<br />
unemployment and underemployment is the lack of entre-<br />
to<br />
skills among many of Washington's residents.<br />
preneurial<br />
many of the unemployed and underemployed--especially<br />
While<br />
minorities and ethnic minorities--can now obtain<br />
racial<br />
for the first time to open their own business, they<br />
capital<br />
not have managerial skills to operate a business with<br />
do<br />
assistance. It is not part of the family nor cultural<br />
expert<br />
of the disadvantaged to have learned capitalistic<br />
background<br />
i.e., experience in selling inexpensive items,<br />
skills;<br />
in business already, experience with budgeting<br />
relatives<br />
investing one's allowance, and enrollment in college<br />
and<br />
business school courses where entrepreneurship is taught<br />
and<br />
experts.<br />
by<br />
given.training in entrepreneurship, however, they could<br />
If<br />
become managers and entrepreneurs in the private<br />
possibly<br />
system. The unemployed could start hiring the<br />
enterprise<br />
around them and the underemployed could find new<br />
unemployed<br />
in being their own boss and having their future<br />
fulfillment<br />
only by their own talents. The lack of Black<br />
limited<br />
Indian capitalism, and Mexican-American capital-<br />
capitalism,<br />
is a shortcoming Washington must begin to overcome.<br />
ism<br />
any discussion of job training and opportunities, one<br />
In<br />
face squarely the related problems of unemployment and<br />
must<br />
underemployment.<br />
134
problem of a sufficient number of jobs in Washington is<br />
The<br />
One facet is-discrimination° The unemployment<br />
manyfold.<br />
among nonwhites is- twice that of whites. Practically<br />
rate<br />
the administrative jobs.are held by whites. Orientals<br />
all<br />
been fairly successful, but Indians, Mexican-Americans,<br />
have<br />
Negroes continue to face job discrimination in many areas<br />
and<br />
the state. The elimination of discrimination does not<br />
of<br />
sweeping changes in our economy or massive additions<br />
require<br />
our governmental agencies. 'It can be accomplished only<br />
to<br />
the will to do so can be generated. The leadership must<br />
if<br />
come from the employer community of Washington State.<br />
AND VIOLENCE IN WASHINGTON STATE, printed in 1969 by<br />
RACE<br />
Commission on the Causes and the Prevention of Civil Disorders,<br />
the<br />
A. Ludlow Kramer, Chairman, contains the following statement:<br />
underemployment and lack of entrepreneurial<br />
Unemployment,<br />
are major reasons for social frustration and hos-<br />
skills<br />
within the ghettos of Washington. Employment<br />
tilities<br />
interact with almost all the others we have<br />
problems<br />
health care, welfare transportation, education,<br />
mentioned:<br />
employment is essential to good housing, higher educa<br />
Good<br />
tion, and most important--to self-pride.<br />
is no lack of government and state concern about<br />
There<br />
for the disadvantaged. Indeed, we found a<br />
employment<br />
array of overlapping, competing and necessarily<br />
confusing<br />
programs. Therefore, we recommend that the State<br />
wasteful<br />
of Employment Security bring together represent.<br />
Department<br />
of the various employment services to establish<br />
tatives<br />
agreed upon procedures to help end the current<br />
jointly<br />
duplication of activities.<br />
wasteful<br />
necessity, governmental action to resolve employment<br />
By<br />
is financed largely at the federal level. Since<br />
problems<br />
the federal government has adequate funds for such a<br />
only<br />
social problem, we support this trend and its expan-<br />
major<br />
sion.<br />
Facilities and Workshops<br />
following chart shows that none of the rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
in Washington State go to special rehabilitation<br />
appropriations<br />
although 7.9 percent of the rehabilitation funds in the<br />
facilities<br />
go for that purpose, Figures are from State Vocational<br />
nation<br />
Agency Program Data, FiscalYear 1967, Rehabilitation<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Administration, Washington, D. C.<br />
Services<br />
135<br />
'
OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY<br />
PERCENT<br />
YEAR 1967<br />
FISCAL<br />
Administration<br />
and Placement<br />
Guidance<br />
Services<br />
Case<br />
Business Enterprises<br />
Small<br />
Workshops<br />
Facilities<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Percent Totals<br />
Washington U.S.<br />
4.7%<br />
7.5%<br />
26.2<br />
43.5<br />
59.5<br />
43.3<br />
0.5<br />
0.7<br />
1.2<br />
5.0<br />
7.9<br />
0<br />
should be made to reduce administrative cost. The state should<br />
Efforts<br />
rehabilitation facilities to assist the clients.<br />
have<br />
Planning Commission considered the need in this state<br />
The<br />
two such rehabilitation facilities. One that was considered was<br />
for<br />
Regional Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center. The other was an<br />
the<br />
Evaluation and Service Center. The Commissionrecommends<br />
Employment<br />
that Washington State have both. A description of each follows:<br />
Comprehensive RehabilitationCenter<br />
statement concerns the Comprehensive Rehabilitation<br />
This<br />
It has been proposed that the State of Washington have a<br />
Center.<br />
rehabilitation center within its borders. There is no<br />
comprehensive<br />
knowledge of such a center in Washington State or within 2,000<br />
present<br />
The best known centers of this kind are at Johnstown, Pennsyl-<br />
miles.<br />
Hot Springs, Arkansas; Fisherville, Virginia; and Warm Springs,<br />
vania;<br />
Georgia.<br />
a comprehensive rehabilitation center is a<br />
Essentially,<br />
where severely handicapped people may go for a variety of rehab-<br />
place<br />
services. Almost any service which is needed can be provided<br />
ilitation<br />
the site. It has training and evaluation, occupational therapy,<br />
on<br />
care, and the like. It has been said that much of the<br />
residential<br />
which the severely handicapped people get in a setting of<br />
learning<br />
nature comes from other clients outside the formal training pro<br />
this<br />
Clients are motivated by each other in the evenings, at meals,<br />
grams.<br />
the residence halls, to want to become whole and useful and self-<br />
in<br />
abundantly. The variety of formal programs of<br />
sustaining--to.live<br />
which go from occupational therapy, to literacy training, to<br />
training<br />
psychiatric therapy, to accounting procedures, to physiotherapy<br />
group<br />
all necessary for certain groups of these severely handicapped<br />
are<br />
people.<br />
a person has been badly hurt in an industrial accident,<br />
If<br />
partially paralyzed in an auto wreck, or felled by a stroke, can<br />
or<br />
services be provided which would make him become self-supporting,<br />
136<br />
9.1%
justifying the rather substantial costs of rehabilitation<br />
therefore<br />
Can success in rehabilitating the severely handicapped<br />
service?<br />
be used to motivate less severely, handicapped people so that<br />
people<br />
too would be motivated to prepare themselves for employment?<br />
they<br />
which tie work evaluation and training with physica<br />
Services<br />
for the severely physically disabled serve the state as<br />
restoration<br />
as the client. Such a comprehensive center is recommended by<br />
well<br />
Federal government which provides 90 percent of the total cost.<br />
the<br />
a center costs about i0 million dollars to construct and two<br />
Such<br />
dollars a year to operate.<br />
million<br />
Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation has<br />
The<br />
having a regional comprehensive rehabilitation center in<br />
considered<br />
State. There have been field trips made by members of<br />
Washington<br />
Commission, by staff members, and by consultants to outstanding<br />
the<br />
comprehensive rehabilitation centers in other states.<br />
Hot Springs Rehabilitation Center, Hot Springs, Arkansas,<br />
The<br />
visited by Mrs. Beryl Gridley and Mrs. Helen Powers, members of<br />
was<br />
Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation, Mrs. Jean<br />
the<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation, and staff members David C, Carson<br />
Mead,<br />
and Allan Wood have also visited this center.<br />
the Pennsylvania Rehabilitation Center, $ohnstown,<br />
Visiting<br />
the Institute for the Crippled and Disabled, and the<br />
Pennsylvania,<br />
of Rehabilitation Medicine, both in New York City, were<br />
Institute<br />
following: Dr. Alfred O. Adams, Messrs. Clarence T. Freeman,<br />
the<br />
P. Holden, John E. Keene, John Merrill, and Robert C, Ridder.<br />
Donald<br />
Donal R. Sparkman visited these.centers earlier. Project Director<br />
Dr.<br />
C. Carson; Pete Shepherd Central Budget Agency; and Peyson<br />
David<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation, toured the centers with members<br />
Jeynes,<br />
of the Planning Commission.<br />
Georgia Rehabilitation Center in Warm Springs, Georgia,<br />
The<br />
visited by Vice-Chairman Roger C. Larson, Project Director David<br />
was<br />
C. Carson and the. following:<br />
W. Burchill, Ass't Commissioner, Employment Security<br />
A.<br />
Department<br />
Kelleher, Ph.D., Ass't Supervisor, Division of<br />
Daniel<br />
Department of Institutions<br />
Planning,<br />
D. Lane, M.D., Chief Medical Consultant, Medical<br />
Jo<br />
Department of Labor and Industries<br />
Section,<br />
D. Pope, Ass't Director, Divisionof Social Services<br />
W.<br />
of Public Assistance<br />
Department<br />
H. Leahy, M. D., State Medical Consultant, Division of<br />
R.<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Vocational<br />
137
August 1968, Project Director David C. Carson and Voca-<br />
In<br />
Rehabilitation Planning Supervisor Irvin Bryan had a meeting<br />
tional<br />
Juneau Alask with Mr. Edward L. Chouinard, Regional Assistant<br />
in<br />
Rehabilitation Services Administration, San Francisco;<br />
Commissioner,<br />
Director Keith J. Anderson; and Director of the Office of<br />
Project<br />
Rehabilitation C. M. Craft, .to discuss-the role of the<br />
Vocational<br />
of Alaska in a comprehensive rehabilitation center in the State<br />
State<br />
Washington. In December 1968, Dan Schausten, Project Director in<br />
of<br />
of the Governor's Planning Committee on Vocational Rehabilita-<br />
Oregon<br />
reported his state's actions, with a request that Oregon citizens<br />
tion,<br />
be served in a center in Washington.<br />
is no comprehensive rehabilitation center in the<br />
There<br />
of Washington or contiguous states at this time to serve the<br />
State<br />
severely handicapped clients of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
state funds be appropriated for a regional Comprehensive<br />
That<br />
Center in the State of Washington.<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Employment Evaluation and Service Center in Washington State<br />
1968 amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act<br />
The<br />
became law July 7, 1968 when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed<br />
which<br />
authorized money to the states for a Vocational Evaluation and<br />
it,<br />
Adjustment Program. Funds for this purpose included $50,000,000<br />
Work<br />
fiscal year 1969; $75,000,000 for 1970; $i00,000,000 for 1971.<br />
for<br />
each succeeding fiscal year only such sums may be appropriated<br />
For<br />
the Congress may hereafter authorize by law. The Federal share<br />
as<br />
the costs of such Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Programs<br />
of<br />
is 90 percent. The state and/or local.share is only i0 percent.<br />
is proposed there be established in the State of Washing-<br />
It<br />
a Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Center in Seattle to<br />
ton<br />
operational in July, 1969. It is proposed further that a<br />
become<br />
such center be opene d in Spokane in January, 1970. The third<br />
second<br />
would be opened in Tacoma in July, 1971. Subsequently, other<br />
center<br />
would be established in other urban centers of the state.<br />
centers<br />
centers would be operated by the Vocational Rehabili-<br />
These<br />
Division but would be planned so that their principal service<br />
tation<br />
be to the disadvantaged and handicapped clients of several<br />
would<br />
It is assumed that the state has a special responsibility<br />
agencies.<br />
try to rehabilitate those who are wholly or partly dependent on it<br />
to<br />
one of its political subdivisions. The next eight pages are<br />
and/or<br />
of a statement of the Project Director tothe Planning Commission<br />
part<br />
December 7, 1969. Public Law 90-391, the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
on<br />
Amendments of 1968, states that "'Evaluation and work adjustment<br />
Act<br />
include, as appropriate in each case, such services as--<br />
services'<br />
138
a preliminary diagnostic study to determine that the individual is<br />
"(A)<br />
has an employment handicap, and that services are needed;<br />
disadvantaged,<br />
a thorough diagnostic study consisting of a comprehensive evalua-<br />
"(B)<br />
of pertinent medical, psychological, vocational, educational, cultural,<br />
tion<br />
and environmental factors which bear on the individual's handicap to<br />
social,<br />
and rehabilitation potential including, to the degree needed, an<br />
employment<br />
of the individual's personality, intelligene level, educational<br />
evaluation<br />
work experience, vocational aptitudes and interests, personal<br />
achievements,<br />
social adjustments, employment opportunities, and other pertinent data<br />
and<br />
in determining the nature and scope of services needed;<br />
helpful<br />
services to appraise the individual's patterns of work behavior and<br />
"(C)<br />
to acquire occupational skills, and to develop work attitudes, work<br />
ability<br />
work tolerance, and social and behavior patterns suitable for suc-<br />
habits,<br />
job performance, including the utilization of work, simulated or real,<br />
cessful<br />
assess and develop the individual's capacities to perform adequately in<br />
to<br />
work environment;<br />
a<br />
any other goods or services provided to a disadvantaged individual,<br />
"(D)<br />
(in accordance with regulations of the Secretary) to be necessary<br />
determined<br />
and which are provided for the purpose of, ascertaining the nature of the<br />
for,<br />
to employment and whether it may reasonably be expected the indivi-<br />
handicap<br />
can benefit from vocational rehabilitation services, or other services<br />
dual<br />
to disadvantaged individuals;<br />
available<br />
"(E) outreach, referral, and advocacy; and<br />
"(F) the administration of these evaluation and work adjustment services."<br />
the Act, disadvantaged individual is defined to mean (i) the mentally and<br />
In<br />
handicapped individuals traditionally served by Vocational Rehabili-<br />
physically<br />
(2) individuals disadvantaged by reason of their youth or advanced<br />
tation,<br />
low educational attainments, ethnic or cultural factors, prison or<br />
age,<br />
records, or other conditions which constitute a barrier to employ-<br />
delinquency<br />
and (3) other members of their families when the provision of vocational<br />
ment,<br />
to family members is necessary for the rehabilitation<br />
rehabilitationservices<br />
an individual described in clause (i) or (2).<br />
of<br />
prototype of a center such as mentioned in the Act is one .operated<br />
The<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the State of Georgia and<br />
by<br />
with funds from the U. S. Office of Economic Opportunity in 1966.<br />
initiated<br />
center is located near downtown Atlanta, Georgia. The Atlanta Employ-<br />
This<br />
Evaluation and Service Center is designed to be a complete community of<br />
ment<br />
and rehabilitation service agencies brought together under one roof with<br />
social<br />
single purpose--serving the client. In short, it is a shopping center which,<br />
a<br />
turn, is in the midst of a deprived area. A former bowling alley was re-<br />
in<br />
and converted to house social workers, rehabilitation counselors,<br />
novated<br />
service personnel, public school teachers, a workshop, sophisticated<br />
employment<br />
evaluation services, medical services, psychological services,a<br />
vocational<br />
and the auxiliary units to keep these service activities functioning<br />
cafeteria<br />
properly. This complex is designed to fill voids in community services and<br />
139
deliver services on a timely basis to many individuals who have not been<br />
to<br />
them. The evaluation component is unique and enables other services<br />
receiving<br />
function at the proper time. It also identifies what services should be<br />
to<br />
the client.<br />
provided<br />
center has been visited by Vice-Chairman Roger Larson of the Plan-<br />
This<br />
Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation, and by Project Director David<br />
ning<br />
Carson of the Planning Commission. In addition, the following individuals<br />
C.<br />
sent from Washington State to consider the services being provided in<br />
were<br />
Atlanta:<br />
W. Burchill, Ass't. Commissioner, Employment Security Department<br />
A.<br />
Kelleher, Ph.D., Ass't. Supervisor, Division of Planning,<br />
Daniel<br />
of Institutions<br />
Department<br />
D. Lane, M. D., Chief Medical Consultant, Medical Section,<br />
J.<br />
of Labor and Industries<br />
Department<br />
D. Pope, Ass't. Director, Division of Social Services,<br />
W.<br />
of Public Assistance<br />
Department<br />
H. Leahy, M. D., State Medical Consultant, Division of<br />
R.<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
is likely that we are in .agreement that the handicapped dis-<br />
It<br />
citizens of the State of Washington would be significantly helped<br />
advantaged<br />
a Employment Evaluation and Service Center. We are also in agreement, I<br />
by<br />
that such a center would need to be modified somewhat for the needs<br />
think,<br />
our citizens. We can use the experience developed in Atlanta in order to<br />
of<br />
a better program here.<br />
have<br />
the past decade or two, vocational rehabilitation agencies have<br />
During<br />
considerable knowledge and competence in the field of evaluating an<br />
developed<br />
potential skills and his ability to use these skills in the<br />
individual's<br />
place. These agencies have also developed an expertise in bringing<br />
market<br />
of service, in a proper combination with timeliness, to bear on<br />
avariety<br />
individual's problems. Their work, however, has been confined largely to<br />
an<br />
individuals with physical or mental impairments.<br />
in the field of vocational rehabilitation and vocational<br />
Activities<br />
have been on the increase in recent years, but the failure to<br />
evaluation<br />
full utilization of the potential skills of number of population<br />
achieve<br />
in our society has resulted in social and economic problems of great<br />
groups<br />
With the emphasis on full manpower utilization, the selection<br />
proportion.<br />
evaluation of trainee candidates assumes a role of major importance. There<br />
and<br />
a number of population groups in which the need for effective vocational<br />
are<br />
has been evidenced: the under-privileged, the technologically dis-<br />
selection<br />
and the elderly, as well as the physically or mentally handicapped<br />
placed,<br />
traditionally served by vocational rehabilitation agencies.<br />
persons<br />
observes that many of the definable groups have been lumped into a<br />
One<br />
category termed the "Culturally Deprived." The mentally ill, the<br />
larger<br />
mentally retarded, the public offenders on probation and parole, the American<br />
140
attempting to live off a reservation, the migrant without deep roots<br />
Indian<br />
this or any other stable culture, the recipient of Public Assistance--<br />
in<br />
all can be helped by a Vocational Evaluation and Work Adjustment Center.<br />
is a great need for competence in the area of evaluation of po-<br />
There<br />
vocational skills and the ability to use these skills. There is a<br />
tential<br />
to develop a system that would meet the individuai needs of indigent<br />
need<br />
as well as to have characteristics that would meet the needs of many<br />
persons,<br />
agencies.<br />
problems of arranging client movement from appointment to ap-<br />
Chronic<br />
awaiting results and reports, and maintaining intra- and inter-<br />
pointment,<br />
lines of communication have been experienced by the counselors of the<br />
agency<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation, case workers of the Department of<br />
Division<br />
Assistance, special education teachers, probation and parole officers,<br />
Public<br />
workers in mental hospitals, and many others try to provide services<br />
social<br />
this target population. This lack of coordination of effort frequently<br />
to<br />
in case failure and a wastage of case service funds. These negative<br />
results<br />
show that Vocational Rehabilitation clients, and especially<br />
experiences<br />
seriously impaired, benefit most when services available to them have<br />
those<br />
direction and coordination. The project planners intended to demon-<br />
common<br />
that this direction and coordination could be achieved most effectively<br />
strate<br />
bringing together trained evaluative teams acting in concert with the<br />
by<br />
client.<br />
impaired<br />
too often people in the helping professions have experienced fail-<br />
All<br />
in dealing with the severely disabled client because of the lack of an<br />
ure<br />
comprehensive evaluation prior to an actual vocational plan being<br />
adequate<br />
This project is geared to provide intensive evaluation of the<br />
implemented.<br />
having serious vocational impairments, and extends far beyond the<br />
client<br />
of resources otherwise available.<br />
scope<br />
referral to the center would have to be made through recognized .agencies,<br />
A<br />
public and non-profit which wouid have a contractual .agreement with the<br />
both<br />
center and be providing one or more of the following services:<br />
Services<br />
Casework<br />
CounselingServices<br />
Counseling and Training<br />
Vocational<br />
Experience Program<br />
Work<br />
Employment Placement Program<br />
such as Seattle, Spokane and Tacoma will each have many dozens<br />
Cities<br />
such agencies.<br />
of<br />
of the disadvantaged and handicapped people who are unemployed will<br />
Many<br />
amenable to help only if they receive rewards that are tangible, and fre-<br />
be<br />
They should be given a free hot lunch daily as many will be inade-<br />
quent.<br />
nourished. They should also be given a snack both morning and after-<br />
quately<br />
noon. They should receive money enough for public transportation to and from<br />
141
center. Those who are heads of households which contain dependent<br />
the<br />
may also be given a modest amount daily for a child care allowance.<br />
children<br />
center such as this would need to have fulltime medical, prosthetic,<br />
A<br />
dental care for those who come to it. Most of the people who are described<br />
and<br />
have both medical and dental problems.. Although'an employment evalua-<br />
above<br />
center is not medically oriented, those people with dental and medical<br />
tion<br />
which can be treated should have them treated while undergoing<br />
limitations<br />
employment evaluation or the work adjustment.<br />
the<br />
of those who come to the center have serious problems with literacy.<br />
Many<br />
education is an important part of such a center. A brush-up course<br />
Special<br />
literacy and math would be particularly useful to some of these people.<br />
in<br />
would be made at the center for continuation of this schooling<br />
Arrangements<br />
later for those who leave the center.<br />
center such as this needs to have a staff of indigenous aides who<br />
A<br />
be helpful to the clients. These aides.should reflect the predominantly<br />
will<br />
and other characteristics of the clients being served. If the client<br />
racial<br />
come to the center as scheduled, or call in, the aide is routinely<br />
doesn't<br />
to the home of the client to see what is the matter.. If the client<br />
dispatched<br />
several days to the center for evaluation he is likely to continue com-<br />
comes<br />
There must be enough concern and reward and attention to the client<br />
ing.<br />
the first few days to assure that he will come. The client is probably<br />
for<br />
comfortable with the aide than he is with the professional staff member.<br />
more<br />
the aides can be selected on the basis that they have empathy, are warm<br />
If<br />
genuine helpful people, the client is most likely to be helped.<br />
client should always be taught that he is there for a vocational<br />
The<br />
rather than to be provided with a .dole. He is there temporarily for<br />
reason<br />
evaluation that may last only two weeks or a work adjustment training that<br />
an<br />
last a few months. He is there until he can be evaluated, trained and<br />
may<br />
placed on a job. The center is vocationally oriented.<br />
The objectives of the center are listed as follows:<br />
To establish harmonious cooperative relations with all<br />
i.<br />
private, and non-profit agencies whose purposes<br />
public,<br />
to assist individuals in need of comprehensive<br />
are<br />
services.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
To provide comprehensive vocational evaluation for the<br />
2.<br />
limited, emotionally disturbed, educable<br />
physically<br />
retarded, and the socially and culturally<br />
mentally<br />
deprived.<br />
To develop new and improved techniques for dealing<br />
3.<br />
the problems of the handicapped, and socially<br />
with<br />
culturally deprived by unity of efforts amid a<br />
and<br />
of resources.<br />
diversity<br />
142
To provide individual attention to the individual<br />
4.<br />
of the client.<br />
need<br />
way to summarize what has been stated to this point One<br />
be to show<br />
copies would<br />
the pages from a handbook given the clients of<br />
the Atlanta Employ-<br />
at<br />
Evaluation and Service Center. Perhaps the center in Seattle<br />
ment<br />
in other<br />
cities in the State of Washington or<br />
be somewhat different; however, we<br />
will<br />
can<br />
an idea from this handbook distributed in Atlanta. The Atlanta Center<br />
get<br />
the prototype for<br />
is<br />
legislation which appropriates monies for the<br />
centers<br />
throughout the United States. (End of statement to the Planning Commission)<br />
MY WHO'S WHO AT AEESC<br />
Referral Agent<br />
Coun sel or<br />
Caseworker<br />
TOWER Evaluator.<br />
Adjustment<br />
Work<br />
Coordinator<br />
Education<br />
Special<br />
Teacher<br />
handbook is your guide during your stay at<br />
This<br />
Atlanta Employment Evaluation and Service<br />
the<br />
In it are answers to many questions you<br />
Center.<br />
ask during the time you are here. Also<br />
might<br />
are facts to help you know more about<br />
included<br />
Center.<br />
the<br />
is YOUR handbook. Please keep it handy<br />
This<br />
ready reference while you are here.<br />
for<br />
143<br />
WHO RUNS THE CENTER?<br />
Atlanta Employment Evaluation and Service<br />
The<br />
is run by the Georgia State Department of<br />
Center<br />
Education, Office of Rehabilitation Services.<br />
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CENTER?<br />
purpose of this Center is to find The known<br />
your<br />
hidden skills and to help you get<br />
and job..<br />
a<br />
ABOUT THE PERSON WHO REFERRED<br />
HOW<br />
TO THE CENTER?<br />
ME<br />
REFERRAL AGENT felt that Your interests<br />
your<br />
be best served by sending would<br />
to our<br />
you<br />
The person who referred Center. remains<br />
you<br />
in you, and will get a report when interested<br />
you<br />
He will play a big part in helping to<br />
leave.<br />
a job for you when your Evaluation has<br />
find<br />
ended.<br />
can be sure that the person who referred<br />
You<br />
to us and the staff at our Center will be<br />
you<br />
working with you to help you get a job.<br />
WHAT CAN EXPECT FROM THE CENTER?<br />
CASEWORKER was your first contact with<br />
Your<br />
Center. She will remain assigned to<br />
the<br />
you<br />
will provide services to you during and<br />
your<br />
here. Your Caseworker will help arrange<br />
stay<br />
for you outside the Center as<br />
appointments<br />
and will answer your questions about<br />
needed<br />
aid, surplus food, family planning, clothing<br />
legal<br />
child care, public housing, etc.<br />
needs,
COUNSELOR will meet with you soon after<br />
Your<br />
come to the Center and often during your<br />
you<br />
here. He is interested in you as a person;<br />
stay<br />
on the job, within family, and in your<br />
your<br />
He will talk with you about different<br />
community.<br />
you are interested in, and tell you how you<br />
jobs<br />
doing with your tests here in our Center.<br />
are<br />
may talk over your personal problems with<br />
You<br />
your Counselor and talk about progress<br />
your<br />
getting a job.<br />
toward<br />
Counselor will arrange services that he feels<br />
Your<br />
be. helpfu to you. You will probably NOT be<br />
will<br />
into ALL of the service areas at the<br />
scheduled<br />
but will be scheduled for SEVERAl of<br />
Center,<br />
services, depending on your needs and yours<br />
these<br />
desires.<br />
CENTER PHYSICIAN will give you a physical<br />
The<br />
exam unless the agency who referred sent us<br />
you<br />
current medical information.<br />
PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT will give you<br />
The<br />
so tests that can we learn about interests,<br />
your<br />
level, and generally, how you figure things<br />
reading<br />
out.<br />
WORK POTENTIAL (TOWER) section will<br />
The<br />
you many give kinds of tasks do. Many will be<br />
to<br />
to you, familiar but others be ENTIRELY<br />
will<br />
to you. By watching you as you work on<br />
NEW<br />
tasks, your TOWER Evaluator will be able<br />
these<br />
tell what your true potentials and skills are.<br />
to<br />
144<br />
WORK ADJUSTMENT section will give you<br />
The<br />
chance to show how you work in an actual job<br />
a<br />
Your Coordinator will see how quick and<br />
setting.<br />
well you can complete tasks. Hewill how<br />
see<br />
you get along with fellow workers and with<br />
how<br />
and if you ask for other tasks when<br />
supervisors,<br />
you finish a job.<br />
EDUCATION is offered to all clients who<br />
SPECIAL<br />
not complete high school and who want a chance<br />
did<br />
brush up on reading and math. Over 100 clients<br />
to<br />
been able to get a High School Equivalency<br />
have<br />
because they worked hard in Special<br />
Certificate<br />
classes.<br />
Education<br />
EVALUA TOR<br />
Your<br />
the center. The<br />
at<br />
Aide's biggest<br />
Evaluator<br />
is to help you get<br />
job<br />
special appointments<br />
to<br />
the Center.<br />
outside<br />
Center is a<br />
This<br />
place. You<br />
big<br />
get "trned<br />
might<br />
during your<br />
around"<br />
days here. If<br />
first<br />
do get lost, or<br />
you<br />
know where to go<br />
don't<br />
ask your Evaluator<br />
next,<br />
Aide.<br />
AIDE can be a big help to you<br />
Lost?<br />
addition to the service areas already described,<br />
In<br />
services may be offered to you here at the<br />
other<br />
or through one of the many related agencies<br />
Center<br />
cooperate with our program.<br />
who
WHAT DOES THE CENTER EXPECT OF/VIE?<br />
DO YOUR BEST<br />
your first day here at our Center, your<br />
During<br />
will give you a schedule card and Counselor<br />
name<br />
a<br />
tag.<br />
sci'IEDgLE CARD will show Your where to go<br />
during you<br />
day. Keep it with you at all times and<br />
each<br />
it from time to time and make check that you are<br />
sure<br />
the correct section of the Center.<br />
in<br />
Schedule Crd<br />
145<br />
NAE TAG tellsothers who Your<br />
are, and shows<br />
which<br />
you<br />
team you are a part of. It will also help<br />
Center<br />
to learn the name of your fellow clients at the<br />
you<br />
Center.<br />
Time<br />
Clock<br />
TIME CARD is used<br />
The<br />
the same way that time<br />
in<br />
are used in regular<br />
cards<br />
You will be<br />
Businesses.<br />
how to use it<br />
shown<br />
during your first<br />
I:roperly<br />
here. Don't forget to<br />
day<br />
In" when you<br />
"Punch<br />
here each mornlng<br />
get<br />
to "Punch Out"<br />
and<br />
you leave every<br />
when<br />
This is our<br />
afternoon.<br />
way of seeing if<br />
main<br />
come to work every<br />
you.<br />
day and on time.
DEPENDABLE<br />
BEING<br />
for any reason you are unable to come to the<br />
If<br />
call your Counselor or Social Worker before<br />
Center,<br />
A.M. If you arrive AFTER 9:00 A.M., report<br />
9:00<br />
directly to your counselor.<br />
We want to see COOPERATION how act and<br />
you<br />
you do a job. Do you "pitch in" and do a good<br />
how<br />
Do you let others keep you from doing your<br />
job?<br />
What happens if you are asked to do a job you<br />
best?<br />
like? Do you don't take pride in doing your best?<br />
way you go about doing a job gives us the answers<br />
The<br />
to these questions and tells us what kind of<br />
answers<br />
you are.<br />
worker<br />
ELSE DO NEED TO KNOW?<br />
WHAT<br />
STUDENT LOUNGE is open during your Ireaks.<br />
The<br />
can sit down and talk with your:friends and<br />
You<br />
clients, buy cold drinks, and candy.<br />
fellow<br />
TELEPttONES are located in the Student<br />
PUBLIC<br />
for your use. Please be thoughtful of others<br />
Lounge<br />
by keeping calls brief.<br />
SPACES are located in front of the<br />
PARKING<br />
for your use if you drive your own car to<br />
building<br />
the Center.<br />
YOU ttAVE TO LEAVE the Center before 4:00 P.M.<br />
IF<br />
check out with your Counselor so that you can<br />
always<br />
be given credit for excused absences.<br />
YOU GET SICK you may<br />
IF<br />
'to our Medical<br />
go<br />
Section. feel bad?<br />
SMALL WEEKLY ALLOWANCE may A be given to you.<br />
includes a free hot lunch daily in our Cafeteria.<br />
'This<br />
$1.00 a day for transportation. If you are the head<br />
and<br />
a household and have dependent children, you may<br />
of<br />
be given $2.00 a day for child care allowance.<br />
also<br />
your Caseworker. for detail s.<br />
Ask<br />
AND RECORD PLAYERS should not be<br />
RADIOS<br />
to the Center.<br />
brought<br />
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LEAVE THE CENTER?<br />
the end of your stay at the Center you and your<br />
Toward<br />
your Counselor will be talking more and more about<br />
what can you do, what do you want to do? You<br />
jobs;<br />
find that you have .the chance to get into a<br />
might<br />
course. Your Counselor will tell you what<br />
training<br />
of training you might be qualified for and will<br />
kind<br />
help you find the best places to get this training.<br />
you need to go to work right away, your Counselor<br />
If<br />
tell you the kinds of jobs that are best for you.<br />
will<br />
person who referred you to us The will be given a<br />
of your Evaluation and will help you in<br />
report<br />
o job in any way possible. Your Center<br />
locating<br />
will tell you who will lead the effort to<br />
Counselor<br />
the proper job for you. IMPORTANT! A<br />
locate<br />
SHARE OF THIS RESPONSIBILITY IS<br />
LARGE<br />
YOURS!<br />
after you have gotten a job, we will still be<br />
Even<br />
in you. It is important that you send us<br />
interested<br />
if you change your address or change yourjob.<br />
word<br />
is also i.mportant that the Center hear from you if<br />
It<br />
you have trouble with job. This will allow us to<br />
your<br />
you solve the problem without losing your job<br />
help<br />
your income!).<br />
(or<br />
YOU AREIMPORTANT. We<br />
REMEMBER---<br />
JUST as interested in YOUR SUCCESS as<br />
are<br />
are YOURSELF!<br />
YOU<br />
7 8<br />
THE COISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />
an employment evaluation and service center be operated<br />
That<br />
the State of Washington by Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
in<br />
146
Facilities and Workshops continued<br />
Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
task forces throughout the state. Task Force II on Work-<br />
utilized<br />
Facilities and Resources functioned as regional advisory<br />
shops<br />
for the State of Washington workshop and facility planning<br />
committees<br />
by Payson H. Jeynes, Rehabilitation Facility Services, Olympia,<br />
headed<br />
The aim of the planning was to provide services for all<br />
Washington.<br />
individuals who need help from workshops, facilities, and<br />
those<br />
so that by 1975 everyone in the state needing these services<br />
resources<br />
will be able to receive them.<br />
Interim State Plan for Workshops and Facilities, pub<br />
The<br />
in 1968 by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, contains<br />
fished<br />
the following information in the words of Mr. Jeynes:<br />
StatewideTotals<br />
1968<br />
compilation of the statewide rehabilitation facilities<br />
A<br />
resources normally used by or available to the rehab-<br />
and<br />
ilitation counselor follows.<br />
State<br />
Number<br />
of Program of Programs Total<br />
Kind<br />
FACILITIES, PRIVATE<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
TAX SUPPORTED i01<br />
AND<br />
cRehabilitation Centers,<br />
i.<br />
entities providing a<br />
Autonomous<br />
range of rehabilitation services.<br />
Rehabilitation Center section of<br />
2.<br />
Hospitals, or University<br />
General<br />
.Special programs of<br />
Unit.<br />
Therapy, Physical<br />
Occupational<br />
and/or Social Work<br />
Therapy,<br />
etc.<br />
Service,<br />
3. Evaluation Centers.<br />
4. Workshops 46<br />
Regional Facilities that provide<br />
5,<br />
or unusual rehabilita-<br />
extensive<br />
services for clients with<br />
tion<br />
disabilities; i.e.,<br />
special<br />
Kidney Center, Speech<br />
Artificial<br />
Hearing Center.<br />
and<br />
147<br />
43
Ki__nd ofProgram<br />
RESOURCES<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
Private<br />
Group living Facilities and<br />
i.<br />
Halfway Houses.<br />
and<br />
Miscellaneous (Crisis Clinic,<br />
2.<br />
Therapy Program.)<br />
Elks'<br />
RESOURCES<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
Supported<br />
Tax<br />
School Programs<br />
i.<br />
programs for mentally<br />
Special<br />
disabled or problem<br />
retarded,<br />
not accommodated in<br />
students<br />
regular classes.<br />
County-City and District Health<br />
2.<br />
Programs<br />
Special clinics<br />
a.<br />
Public health nursing<br />
b.<br />
services<br />
Institutions<br />
3.<br />
In-Patient<br />
For<br />
a.<br />
Delinquent Minors<br />
Mentally retarded<br />
b.<br />
Mental-.emotional adults<br />
c.<br />
and children•<br />
Out-Patient<br />
For<br />
Health•'Faciliti es<br />
Mental<br />
U. S. Government<br />
4.<br />
employees, veterans,<br />
Government<br />
servicemen<br />
(In-Patient)<br />
Hospitals<br />
Dispensary (Out-Patient)<br />
Government Program<br />
Special<br />
training Seattle (Area<br />
Work<br />
Beaut if icat ion)<br />
Statewide•SitUations•and Considerations<br />
39<br />
i0<br />
114<br />
5¸1<br />
40<br />
State<br />
Total<br />
is imperative that the local vocational rehabilitation<br />
It<br />
have. a good relationship with local facilities and<br />
programs<br />
workshops. Facilities, workshops and rehabilitation agencies<br />
148<br />
266
interdependent, They deal with the same problem the<br />
are<br />
of the vocationally handicapped individual.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
good rehabilitation facilities and workshops will<br />
Build±ng<br />
in better vocat±onal rehabilitation programs.<br />
result<br />
Interim Plan for Workshops and Facllltles has as its<br />
This<br />
the orderly development of workshops and facilities<br />
objective<br />
as to provide needed serviQes for all Washington State<br />
so<br />
who need help, and particularly the clients of the<br />
persons<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
inventory indicates that we have 46 sheltered workshops<br />
Our<br />
one in Oregon and 55 rehabilitation facility<br />
including<br />
Their records indicate some type of service<br />
programs.<br />
to over 20,000 persons during the past year, There<br />
given<br />
266 other programs in Washington that are classified<br />
are<br />
rehabilitation resources because they do not meet the<br />
as<br />
definition of a facility or workshop at this time.<br />
present<br />
are, however, possible future facilities or workshops.<br />
They<br />
the persons in need of rehabilitation facilities<br />
Considering<br />
workshops) as a conservative one-half of one<br />
(excluding<br />
of the state population, at the present time the<br />
percent<br />
are serving only. 14 percent of the people who<br />
facilities<br />
the service. This is based on the fact that at the<br />
need<br />
of the survey of facilities there were 2,299 clients<br />
time<br />
receiving services out of a potential client load of 16,300,<br />
the same method with the information obtained in our<br />
Using<br />
of workshops, an estimated one-half of one percent<br />
survey<br />
the population could benefit from workshop programs, we<br />
of<br />
that on the day of the survey the workshops were<br />
find<br />
only 15 percent of the need. This is based on the<br />
meeting<br />
that 2,414 persons out of a potential of 16,300 were<br />
fact<br />
receiving service.<br />
both facilities and workshops we found many programs<br />
With<br />
the available operation was not being utilized fully.<br />
where<br />
is particularly true with the vocational rehabilita-<br />
This<br />
facilities. Many physical therapy departments in<br />
tion<br />
in both large and small communities could handle<br />
hospitals<br />
a few more patients. Many hospitals in relatively<br />
quite<br />
communities like Wenatchee have large physical therapy<br />
small<br />
handling a big load of out-patients. At certain<br />
departments<br />
of the year this service is.badly needed since<br />
times<br />
a fw physical therapists practice in the area.<br />
only<br />
large physical therapy departments although fully<br />
These<br />
during part of the year are not utilized completely<br />
utilized<br />
the rest of the time.<br />
149
Washington has large rehabilitation facilities that<br />
Western<br />
services for clients from the whole state; for ex-<br />
provide<br />
the University of Washington Hospital; the H. T.<br />
ample,<br />
Center of the Labor and Industries Department; the<br />
Buckner<br />
Center for the Blind; and such private operations<br />
Northwest<br />
the Virginia Mason Hospital and Clinc; the Children's<br />
as<br />
Hospital, all in Seattle; C.O,V,E. in Everett;<br />
Orthopedic<br />
Industries Rehabilitation Center in Tacoma; and<br />
Goodwill<br />
the Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Center in Puyallup.<br />
artificial Kidney Center in Seattle and the Elks'<br />
The<br />
Therapy Program are other regional programs out of<br />
Mobile<br />
Seattle.<br />
the present time plans are in progress for a new com-<br />
At<br />
multi-disability center in Seattle to be located<br />
prehensive<br />
not far from Sick's Stadium.<br />
all the existing facilities in Seattle, present and<br />
Despite<br />
growth in King County as well as the temporary influx<br />
future<br />
the sick and disabled people that always occurs in a big<br />
of<br />
will continue to build need for rehabilitation facility<br />
city<br />
services.<br />
needs of the culturally deprived and disadvantaged for<br />
The<br />
facility.services especially in King County<br />
rehabilitation<br />
rapidly becoming evident and this need should be met by<br />
is<br />
establishment of new programs.<br />
the<br />
Spokane area shows an.unquestioned need for the ser-<br />
The<br />
of a comprehensive multi-disability center. A com-<br />
vices<br />
rehabilitation center in Spokane with a vocational<br />
plete<br />
program tied in with a hospital physical medi-<br />
evaluation<br />
program would provide services to a wide area and<br />
.cine<br />
clients from Oregon, Idaho, and Montana as well<br />
attract<br />
as<br />
Eastern Washington.<br />
information on sheltered workshops brings out the<br />
Statewide<br />
that most ofthem are small. Only a few provide ser-<br />
fact<br />
for more than 75 people. The largest workshop in the<br />
vice<br />
is Goodwill Industries in Seattle which has a total<br />
state<br />
of 400 people. Most of the workshops have tended<br />
caseload<br />
serve local people in their own area, but some of them<br />
to<br />
been enlarging and opening their doors to more distant<br />
have<br />
This naturally creates a need for supervised<br />
clients.<br />
housing for the people who come from outside the town.<br />
facilities and workshops have continued to grow in<br />
Both<br />
size and quality of service. Although we have no<br />
numbers,<br />
for the growth of facilities we do have some figures<br />
figures<br />
the U. S. Department of Labor which indicates the<br />
from<br />
150
of sheltered workshops in the state. In 1961 there<br />
growth<br />
18 workshops with !032 clients. In 1966 there were<br />
were<br />
workshops and 1,612 clients. We now have 46 workshops<br />
28<br />
2,414 clients on the date of our recent survey includ-<br />
with<br />
ing one workshop in Portland, Oregon.<br />
seems to be true that only a small proportion who could<br />
It<br />
from the services of a sheltered workshop now<br />
benefit<br />
participate in the programs. Many workshops<br />
actually<br />
not only as a place of work but also as a labora-<br />
function<br />
for the development of new methods and techniques for<br />
tory<br />
handicapped persons. The work activity itself is<br />
training<br />
to clients as it keeps them mentally and physi<br />
beneficial<br />
active and contributes to their recovery.<br />
cally<br />
is no reason why workshops cannot be utilized to assist<br />
There<br />
train the disadvantaged or culturally deprived persons.<br />
and<br />
workshops and sheltered work opportunities might<br />
Sheltered<br />
used to provide work experience and skill training for<br />
be<br />
long-term unemployed who do not have the education or<br />
the<br />
experience backgrounds necessary for them to compete<br />
work<br />
on an equal basis for jobs in our society.<br />
all areas of the state there.is a need for better utiliza-<br />
In<br />
of the workshops we have, and in most areas of the state<br />
tion<br />
is a need for more transitional and extended service<br />
there<br />
Some of these needs may be met by satellite<br />
workshops.<br />
operations of larger shops.<br />
service workshops are becoming more and more neces-<br />
Extended<br />
to serve growing numbers of people who will never be<br />
sary<br />
to work in a competitive setting. Since work itself<br />
able<br />
therapeutic, money spent in a government subsidy to a<br />
is<br />
is better than the same money spent to support a<br />
workshop<br />
on the Public Assistance rolls or in a state institu<br />
person<br />
tion.<br />
questionnaire completed by rehabilitation counselors in<br />
A<br />
state regarding relationships between the Division work-<br />
the<br />
and other facilities, revealed a need for improved<br />
shops<br />
among the various programs. Publication of<br />
communication<br />
WORKSHOPS by the State Office is an attempt<br />
WASHINGTON<br />
fill this need.<br />
to<br />
the development of a Workshop Manual, and improved<br />
With<br />
between the counselors and the workshops and<br />
communications<br />
people, many of these problems are being alle-<br />
facilities<br />
(End of statement by Mr. Jeynes)<br />
viated.<br />
151
WASHINGTON WO.PKSHOP a newsletter, was initi.ated in<br />
The<br />
1968 by the Divi.s$on of Octional Rehabilitation to<br />
Jul-August<br />
coordinate news and activit±es of sheltered workshops. Actively<br />
help<br />
the Division in this effort is. the Wshington Association<br />
assisting<br />
Rehabilitation Industries for the Handicapped. Elton Troth of the<br />
of<br />
staff, is the editor.<br />
Division<br />
State workshops are among the finest in the<br />
Washington<br />
States. They have been subsidized in different ways by Voca-<br />
United<br />
Rehabilitation. The workshops and the Division of Vocational<br />
tional<br />
have had a symbiotic effect on each other. An effort<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
be made to carry out the principles enunciated in a policy state-<br />
will<br />
by the National Rehabilitation Association, Board of Directors,<br />
ment<br />
October 2, .1968. A quotation from the statement follows:<br />
growing use of workshops as facilities for the rehabili-<br />
The<br />
and employment of handicapped people and the unique<br />
tation<br />
which must be solved in connection with the<br />
problems<br />
development, and proper use of such facil-<br />
establishment,<br />
resulted in the development by the National Rehabili-<br />
ities<br />
Association of this statement of public policy on<br />
tation<br />
important subject. It is the position of the National<br />
this<br />
Association that:<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
There are numerous severely handicapped individuals<br />
i.<br />
this country who are not able to compete in open<br />
in<br />
employment.<br />
As the result of a controlled work experience many<br />
2.<br />
these individuals will be able to move into open<br />
of<br />
Others cannot attain or maintain production<br />
employment,<br />
expected of workers, and, hence, cannot earn<br />
standards<br />
the wages ordinarily paid.<br />
It is sound public policy that handicapped individuals<br />
3.<br />
given the opportunity to work for pay to the extent<br />
be<br />
of their productive capacity.<br />
Workshops have been established to provide work oppor-<br />
4.<br />
and related services for handicapped individuals.<br />
tunities<br />
functions of the workshop are to provide evaluation<br />
The<br />
work potential, work adjustment, vocational training,<br />
of<br />
employment for limited or a combination of these.<br />
paid<br />
person sould be continued in a workshop program who<br />
No<br />
can be placed in suitable outside employment.<br />
A workshop performing more than one of the functions<br />
5.<br />
above should be able to identify clearly the<br />
listed<br />
portion of its total program devoted to each function.<br />
152
Clients in workshops should be paid on the basis of<br />
6.<br />
Wage rates should be based on local pre-<br />
productivity.<br />
wages for the same or similar work, and all clients<br />
vailing<br />
employees should be covered by social security.<br />
and<br />
principles will apply to handicapped persons<br />
These<br />
services under a program gponsored by a rehab-<br />
receiving<br />
agency. Workshops, whether private or public<br />
ilitation<br />
should adhere to applicable federal and state<br />
auspices,<br />
wage and hour regulations.<br />
It is the responsibility of the sponsors and the commun-<br />
7.<br />
to provide the initial costs of land, buildings,<br />
ity<br />
and the cost of auxiliary services needed in<br />
equipment,<br />
with providing work opportunities for handi<br />
connection<br />
persons. The cost of such facilities, equipment,<br />
capped<br />
services should not be considered as costs of pro-<br />
and<br />
duction to be paid before wages.<br />
Agencies using workshops for evaluation and training<br />
8.<br />
should pay the cost of these services. These<br />
purposes<br />
should also pay living allowances to handi-<br />
agencies<br />
people receiving training or evaluation when this<br />
capped<br />
is necessary to assure satisfactory living conditions.<br />
A workshop cannot be expected to pay wage rates higher<br />
9.<br />
prevailing community rates for the same or similar<br />
than<br />
If subsidies are needed to enable the handicapped<br />
work.<br />
to maintain a decent standard of living, then<br />
individual<br />
subsidies should be clearly identified and not paid<br />
such<br />
a part of wages and may appropriately come from the<br />
as<br />
federal government, the state or the community.<br />
In order to enable handicapped people to increase their<br />
i0.<br />
the workshop should overcome inadequacies and<br />
earnings,<br />
that limit productive capacity and its<br />
inefficiencies<br />
workers.<br />
A workshop should negotiate its contracts and set its<br />
ii.<br />
at a level which will assure fair competition.<br />
prices<br />
a workshop undercuts prices of private industry by<br />
If<br />
workers or by absorbing overhead costs, it<br />
underpaying<br />
guilty of unfair competition as well as unfair labor<br />
is<br />
Such practices may actually result in the<br />
practices.<br />
unfairly subsidizing an industry that gives<br />
community<br />
workshop a contract.<br />
the<br />
A workshop should have a grievance procedure for communi-<br />
12.<br />
with trainees and employees which facilitates<br />
cating<br />
and hearing complaints and discussing the<br />
receiving<br />
of general or specific nature.<br />
problems<br />
153
The Military Rejectee<br />
the early 1960s rehabilitation services for the military<br />
In<br />
were proposed. Almost all eighteen-year-old males in the<br />
rejectee<br />
States register under the Selective Service System. Many of<br />
United<br />
individuals either physically or intellectully are unable to<br />
these<br />
the minimum standards of the Armed Services, A number of these<br />
meet<br />
individuals have vocational potential. Many have correctable<br />
rejected<br />
defects. Those that are illiterate can be provided specialized<br />
physical<br />
to improve their academic skills. Efforts were made in the<br />
training<br />
to provide rehabilitation services to those rejected as unfit by<br />
1960s<br />
draft boards. However, many of those who were offered vocational<br />
the<br />
services refused those services, particularly if they<br />
rehabilitation<br />
the correction of any defect will make them eligible for the<br />
feel<br />
Services. Military service for many is so repugnant that draftees<br />
Armed<br />
the vocational rehabilitation service which would correct the<br />
refused<br />
The referral program was never vigorously pursued in Washing-<br />
defect.<br />
State and is now dormant.<br />
ton<br />
Pub lic Assistance<br />
THE COMMISSION REGOMMENDS:<br />
since the basic role of persons in some helping pro-<br />
That,<br />
is similar, part of the training programs for new<br />
fessions<br />
and in-service training programs for those in<br />
employees<br />
employment should be together. Those trained together<br />
state<br />
be rehabilitation counselors, employment security<br />
would<br />
public assistance caseworkers, probation and<br />
counselors,<br />
officers, public health nurses, and the like. This<br />
parole<br />
of the training could be done under the State Department<br />
part<br />
of Personnel.<br />
following statement about one aspect of his program is<br />
The<br />
by Mr. E. M. Oliver, long-time Director and Executive Officer of<br />
made<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Coordinating Council for<br />
the<br />
Education.<br />
Occupational<br />
its inception in 1933 the Division of Vocational<br />
Since<br />
has worked with disabled public assistance recipients.<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
1955, legislation was enacted which was to make the<br />
In<br />
State program unique in the nation through the initiation<br />
Washington<br />
a pilot program, supported entirely by state funds, for the rehabili-<br />
of<br />
of nondisabled public assistance recipients.<br />
tation<br />
1955 through the biennium which ended June 30, 1967,<br />
From<br />
program, supported by state funds, provided rehabilitation ser-<br />
this<br />
vices to selected public assistance recipients who were vocationally<br />
154
and unable to hold or get jobs because they lacked the<br />
handicapped,<br />
and training required in the labor market. These persons were<br />
skills<br />
to the Division by the local offices of the State Department<br />
referred<br />
Public Assistance. Through the years the combined services provided<br />
of<br />
rehabilitation counselors and social workers, working side by side,<br />
by<br />
so successful that the general philosophy claimed the attention<br />
proved<br />
recognition of the Federal Office of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
and<br />
years later, under the Amendments to the Federal Vocational<br />
Eleven<br />
Act, Federal funds became available to support within<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
the states the type of service pioneered in the State of Washington.<br />
all<br />
assessments of the Division's program for public<br />
Various<br />
recipients have been made. In the early 1950s, the State<br />
assistance<br />
for Vocational Education which had the administrative responsi-<br />
Board<br />
for the vocational rehabilitation program in Washington State<br />
bility<br />
with the University of Washington to do a study with regard<br />
contracted<br />
the effectiveness of the entire vocational rehabilitation program.<br />
to<br />
study, issued in 1954, was completed by Frank Ro Bruel,<br />
The<br />
that time an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Social<br />
at<br />
at the University of Washington. It was entitled, DO THEY STAY<br />
Work,<br />
The author in his conclusions stated in part that the<br />
REHABILITATED?<br />
of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation were remark-<br />
"services<br />
successful" and that "one could not ask for a higher percentage<br />
ably<br />
self-supporting individuals after a period of from 30 to 41 months<br />
of<br />
closure."<br />
following<br />
1960, the State Board for Vocational Education again<br />
In<br />
an outside agency, the Washington State Research Council, to<br />
sought<br />
and report on the degree of economic success or failure of both<br />
study<br />
regular program for the disabled and the growing program for the<br />
the<br />
of public assistance recipients. This report concluded<br />
rehabilitation<br />
"the employment, wage and public assistance record of 125 cases<br />
that<br />
receiving vocational rehabilitation services for the nondisabled<br />
after<br />
beyond any doubt the value of these services."<br />
demonstrates<br />
Washington program was the subject of a Federal study,<br />
The<br />
ANALYSIS OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR NONDISABLED<br />
AN<br />
PERSONS, prepared by the Division of Statistics and<br />
DISADVANTAGED<br />
of the Federal Rehabilitation Services Administration. Case-<br />
Studies<br />
data for the 1967 Fiscal Year were supplied to the Federal agency<br />
load<br />
the Division for this study. Authors of the study state: "...the<br />
by<br />
results, limited though they are, fortify our a pror<br />
Washington<br />
that the well-developed, patient, comprehensive, individ-<br />
assumptions<br />
vocational rehabilitation approach is an obvious way in which<br />
ualized<br />
help the nondisabled but disadvantaged person achieve a better<br />
to<br />
life for himself and his children."<br />
155
1967: its pioneer.ing period over, the program for the<br />
After<br />
ws incorporated into the general service program of the<br />
nondishled<br />
Te graph belo is from the DiVision's 1967 Annual Report.<br />
Division.<br />
show the number of persons rehaBiltated by the Nondisabled<br />
Figures<br />
Program and by the general agency.<br />
HANDICAPPED PERSONS REHABILITATED<br />
13.648<br />
10-YEAR PERIOD<br />
IN<br />
BIENNIUM THROUGH 1965/'67 BIENNIUM<br />
1957/59<br />
521<br />
3<br />
Nondisabled Program<br />
figure.:<br />
Combined<br />
Federal-State<br />
Services<br />
Extended<br />
Nondisabled<br />
2,399<br />
1,898<br />
i12!'.<br />
57/59 59/61<br />
686<br />
2,997<br />
61/153<br />
BIENNIUM<br />
2,833<br />
!.<br />
63/65<br />
759.<br />
65/67<br />
total of all rehabilitated cases for this 10-year period was<br />
The<br />
Of this number,"2,619 were served in the Nondisabled<br />
13,648.<br />
11,029 were rehabilitated as clients of Federal-State<br />
Program;<br />
Extended Services programs.<br />
an4.<br />
13,648 rehabilit'ants had 23,297 dependents, raising to a<br />
The<br />
total of 36,945 the number of persons who benefited<br />
grand<br />
whose lives were involved in. the rehabilitation process in<br />
and<br />
time.<br />
this<br />
public assistance recipients from both the<br />
Rehabilitated<br />
and general agency program have formed a creditable<br />
Nondisabled<br />
of the number rehabilitated Dy the Division as the following<br />
portion<br />
shows.<br />
table<br />
156
ASSISTANCE RECIPIENTS REHABILITATED<br />
PUBLIC<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation: 1964 1968<br />
Division<br />
TOTAL REHABILITATED<br />
of rehabilitated<br />
Number<br />
referred by public<br />
cases<br />
welfare agencies<br />
% of total rehabilitated<br />
1964 1965 1966 1967 1968<br />
1355 1478 1564 1957 1855<br />
475 420 502 625 423<br />
34.0% 28.5% 32.1% 31.9% 22.8%<br />
leadership in rehabilitating the largest per-<br />
Washingtons<br />
of public assistance cases of any state in the Union did not<br />
centage<br />
about by accident. Please See table on following page. The<br />
come<br />
which initiated the program resulted from the cooperative<br />
legislation<br />
of the director of Employment Security, the director of Public<br />
efforts<br />
and the director of Vocational Rehabilitation. Joint<br />
Assistance,<br />
of these three departments secured passage of the law which<br />
efforts<br />
three have actively supported throughout the years.<br />
all<br />
Division, again in cooperation with EmploymentSecurity<br />
The<br />
Public Assistance departments, has budgeted for the 1969-71<br />
and<br />
substantial new funds which are expected to double the<br />
biennium<br />
efforts in the rehabilitation of public assistance recip<br />
Division's<br />
ients.<br />
in 1968, joint planning and cooperative efforts by<br />
Further,<br />
Department of Public Assistance, the Division of Vocational<br />
the<br />
and the RegionalOffice of the Federal Rehabilitation<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Administration led to the securing of a Federal grant for a<br />
Services<br />
evaluate and inventory the rehabilitation potential of<br />
project"to<br />
selected sample of Public Assistance recipients."<br />
a<br />
a project director, a manual of procedures was. drafted,<br />
Under<br />
by March 1969, the project was ready to launch. Following study<br />
and<br />
and the hiring of necessary personnel the agencies involved<br />
sessions<br />
to initiate by July 1969 a program designed to evaluate the<br />
expect<br />
potential of public assistance recipients and to move<br />
rehabilitation<br />
toward preparing these individuals for self-support.<br />
constructively<br />
project is discussed in greater detail under 2bl WIfare,<br />
The<br />
182-184,<br />
page<br />
157
RANKING OF STATES IN ORDER OF THE PERCENT<br />
A<br />
REHABILITATED CASES RECEIVING PUBLIC ASSISTANCE<br />
OF<br />
WHEN ACCEPTED FOR REHABILITATION SERVICES 1966 and 19671<br />
TOP TEN STATES 1966<br />
S TA TE<br />
Number<br />
Rehabilitated<br />
of P.A.<br />
Number<br />
Acceptance<br />
at<br />
of Total Rehabilitated<br />
Percent<br />
PA at Acceptance<br />
Receiving<br />
1,330 312 23.5%<br />
Washington<br />
liforn ia 4,522 1,059 23.4<br />
Ca<br />
822 190 23.1<br />
Utah<br />
4,365 890 20.4<br />
Kentucky<br />
668 135 20.2<br />
Delaware<br />
255 50 19.6<br />
Vermont<br />
M ex ico 476 88 18.5<br />
New<br />
12,338 2,135 17.3<br />
Pennsylvania<br />
Virginia 4,029 699 17 ;3<br />
West<br />
82 14 17.1<br />
Alaska<br />
U. S. TOTALS 154,279 20,106 13.1<br />
TOP TEN STATES 1967<br />
1,689<br />
Washington<br />
968<br />
Utah<br />
6,375<br />
California<br />
4,810<br />
Kentucky<br />
Virginia 4,319<br />
West<br />
127<br />
Alaska<br />
4,439<br />
Missouri<br />
1,1.13<br />
Oregon<br />
3,300<br />
Oklahoma<br />
13,112<br />
Pennsylvania<br />
U. S. TOTALS 173,594<br />
25.9<br />
438<br />
22.0<br />
190<br />
18.5<br />
1,179<br />
17.7<br />
849<br />
16.8<br />
725<br />
16:5<br />
21<br />
16.4<br />
729<br />
16.2<br />
180<br />
15.7<br />
517<br />
15.4<br />
2,015<br />
21,451 12.4<br />
Figures compiled by Division of Statistics and Studies, Rehabilitation Services Administration,<br />
FROM:<br />
distributed at Policy Committee Meeting, Council of State Administrators for Vocational<br />
and<br />
Rehabilitation, February 6-8, 1968, Washington, D.C.<br />
this study the Federal agency combined the closed, case figures from the State-Federal program<br />
1/For<br />
from the state agency serving the blind. In Washington State these are separate programs, but in<br />
and<br />
states a single agency administers both. The 1966 figure for Washington includes 1,209<br />
many<br />
in the State-Federal program, plus 121 rehabilitated by the Services for the Blind. For<br />
rehabilitated<br />
1967, the figures are 1,551 for the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and 138 for the blind agency.<br />
158
a recent meeting of directors and staff of the State<br />
At<br />
of Public Assistance and the Division of Vocational<br />
Department<br />
the two agencies agreed that an important and vital<br />
Rehabilitation,<br />
facing them today is to assist public welfare applicants and<br />
task<br />
to become self-supporting. Both departments recognize<br />
recipients<br />
the challenge to rehabilitate impoverished and dependent citi-<br />
that<br />
zens has never been greater.<br />
Division has set a goal to move from some I000 public<br />
The<br />
recipients rehabilitated per biennium to approximately<br />
assistance<br />
Joining in this common effort with the Division will be the<br />
2000.<br />
Security Department and the State Department of Public<br />
Employment<br />
Assistance. (End of statement byMr. Oliver)<br />
of the State Department of Public Assistance<br />
Services<br />
considered in a book published by the Planning Commission,<br />
are<br />
IN WASHINGTON STATE: PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY STATE<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
These improvements in the services were recommended<br />
AGENCIES.<br />
the chapters written by one of the co-authors, John B. Welsh, Jr.,<br />
in<br />
is shown in the photograph with the Research Analyst, Mrs. Jean<br />
who<br />
who gathered the laws and interagency agreements having the<br />
Mead,<br />
of laws which were recorded in the book.<br />
effect<br />
159
Migrants<br />
State of Washington makes extensive use of migrant farm<br />
The<br />
to handle the apples, peaches, apricots and berries. Many of<br />
labor<br />
migrants are severely deprived people. A series of articles<br />
these<br />
Darrell Houston, a reporter for the SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER, was<br />
by<br />
in September, 1968 under the title, "Slums in the Orchards."<br />
published<br />
reports indicate that the plight,of the migrant farm laborer has<br />
These<br />
improved significantly in recent years. The abominable conditions<br />
not<br />
which these people live and work have been described at length.<br />
under<br />
Agee wrote about the rural poor in a penetrating work,<br />
James<br />
US NOW PRAISE FAMOUS MEN. In his introduction he outlined the<br />
LET<br />
as follows: "...to pry intimately into the lives of an undefended<br />
task<br />
appallingly damaged group of human beings, an ignorant and helpless<br />
and<br />
family, for the purpose of parading the nakedness, disadvantage<br />
rural<br />
humilitation of these lives before another group of human beings,<br />
and<br />
in the name of science, of 'honest journalism.'"<br />
GRAPES OF WRATH, written about the migrant workers of<br />
THE<br />
1930's, earned John Steinbeck a Nobel Prize for literature.<br />
the<br />
legislation,however, to help. these people has not been written.<br />
Social<br />
are fewer in number now each year, butthe conditions under which<br />
There<br />
they live and work are as bad as ever.<br />
Rehabilitation Amendments of 1965 provided grants<br />
Vocational<br />
a 90/10 ratio to stateswhich would serve these damaged people.<br />
on<br />
money, however,, for the program was not appropriated by Congress.<br />
The<br />
was another case where services were promised but not provided.<br />
This<br />
people in their dumb resignation continue to be abused continue<br />
These<br />
provide little to society as a whole.<br />
to<br />
Social Security and Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
comments which follow were prepared for this report by.<br />
The<br />
P. Holden, Supervisorin charge of Social Security and Disa-<br />
Donald<br />
bility Services.<br />
Social Security Act as amended in 1965, provides for<br />
The<br />
payments to disabled workers and to disabled children who.<br />
benefit<br />
have attained age eighteen.<br />
1966-67 Amendments to the Social Security Act extended<br />
The<br />
benefits to disabled widows, widowers, and surviving<br />
disability<br />
wives, based upon the Social Security wage records of a<br />
divorced<br />
spouse. The cost of rehabilitation services provided to<br />
deceased<br />
workers, disabled widows, widowers, and surviving divorced<br />
disabled<br />
chargeable to the Federal Disability Trust Fund or to the<br />
wives<br />
Federal OASI Trust Fund.<br />
160
intent of Congress in making Trust Fund monies avail-<br />
The<br />
to pay rehabilitation costs is to make it possible for more<br />
able<br />
to be rehabilitated into gainful employment. In so<br />
beneficiaries<br />
Congress intended that the monies be used in such a way that<br />
doing,<br />
savings in benefits that would otherwise be paid, plus the ad-<br />
the<br />
contributions to the Trust Fund paid on-earnings of bene-<br />
ditional<br />
who returned to jobs will exceed, or at least equal the<br />
ficiaries<br />
paid from the Trust Funds for rehabilitation costs. All ad-<br />
money<br />
and case costs for this program are supported one hun-<br />
ministrative<br />
percent by Federal Social Security Trust Funds.<br />
dred<br />
program in this state started in July 1966, and at<br />
The<br />
end of the first six months had 495 cases in the program. By<br />
the<br />
end of the fiscal year 1967, the caseload had increased to 705.<br />
the<br />
year later in June 1968, it had 825 cases. During the first fiscal<br />
A<br />
42 cases were closed.rehabilitated,and in the 1967-68 fiscal<br />
year<br />
the total rehabilitations were 105, an increase of one hundred<br />
year<br />
fifty percent.<br />
of the functions of the Trust Fund program is to screen<br />
One<br />
Social Security Disability claimant applicants for vocational<br />
all<br />
services. The number of cases reviewed is shown on<br />
rehabilitation<br />
table below:<br />
the<br />
SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIMS: 1964-1968<br />
1964/65 1965/66 1967/68 TOTAL<br />
Cases Reviewed 4,250 6,123 10,824 21,197<br />
Screened Out 3.,848 4,819 8,304 16,971<br />
Accepted 402 1,304 2,520 4,226<br />
Rehabilitated 42 105 147<br />
has been a substantial increase in both the number of<br />
There<br />
being served under this program during the last three years, as<br />
cases<br />
well as the number of cases that are being rehabilitated.<br />
program is administered by a state supervisor (Social<br />
The<br />
Administration Disability Service), four vocational rehabili-<br />
Security<br />
officers working full-time on Trust Fund caseloads;.two in<br />
tation<br />
one in Tacoma and one in Spokane. In the smaller towns and<br />
Seattle,<br />
161
areas, these severely handicapped people were served by the<br />
rural<br />
vocational rehabilitation officer.<br />
regular<br />
all the vocational rehabilitation potential is realized<br />
If<br />
these Social Security Disability pension clients, it will be<br />
from<br />
that the staff helping these people be-doubled and the case<br />
necessary<br />
money be more than doubled. It is better to have experienced<br />
service<br />
assiRned to helping these difficult cases, the way it is<br />
counselors<br />
(End of statement by Mr. Holden)<br />
now.<br />
Disab led Youth<br />
THE CO4ISSION RECOENDS:<br />
state-supported nursery schools and home therapy services<br />
That<br />
established for the deaf, hard-of-hearing and language-<br />
be<br />
de layed child.<br />
every student who is in need of vocational rehab-<br />
That...<br />
services should be served.<br />
ilitation<br />
of the most significant programs in Vocational Rehab-<br />
One<br />
involves handicapped youth. This program provides the<br />
ilitation<br />
combination of habilitation and rehabilitation. It combines<br />
best<br />
and therapy. Those states which have provided signifi-<br />
prevention<br />
for disabled youth in special education classes have had<br />
cantly<br />
results. The greatest majority of the youngsters who have<br />
amazing<br />
through thiscooperative school program--more than 90 percent<br />
gone<br />
them--are employed afterwards. .Young people who go through a<br />
of<br />
education program which does not have vocational rehabili-<br />
special<br />
ties are apt to have one chance in two of being employed.<br />
tation<br />
cooperative school rehabilitation program in the State<br />
The<br />
Washington has not served enough people so far. In the last full<br />
of<br />
year--1968, there were only 58 clients closed rehabilitated.<br />
fiscal<br />
secondary level special education students have a disability and<br />
All<br />
likely to be feasible for rehabilitation services; all should<br />
are<br />
served. A further discussion of the school program appears under<br />
be<br />
Mental Retardation, page 196.<br />
COOPERATIVE SCHOOL/REHABILITATION PROGRAMS<br />
Donald Hamilton<br />
by<br />
Supervisor of Educational Services<br />
State<br />
decades public schools have faced the problem of drop-<br />
For<br />
These are slow learners with mental retardation, emotional<br />
outs.<br />
and other forms of disability which require a new educa-<br />
disturbances<br />
approach. Today the modern school system has responded to<br />
tional<br />
these needs by the gradual development, first, of elementary school<br />
162
adjusted to the needs of handicapped students and, more<br />
programs<br />
similar provisions for junior and senior high school stu-<br />
recently,<br />
as well. Curriculum modifications, special teaching methods,<br />
dents<br />
equipment, special health services, and special counseling<br />
adaptive<br />
have been developed with this group in mind. However, the stu-<br />
all<br />
still faces formidable barriers in moving from school to a<br />
dent<br />
adjustment in the community, including a suitable job.<br />
satisfactory<br />
his problems has lead to natural union of public school ser-<br />
Solving<br />
vices and vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
State of Washington, in building toward such a program<br />
The<br />
a caseload study in 1962 with 50 dropouts from the Tacoma Public<br />
did<br />
The results were so successful that a team from the Tacoma<br />
Schools.<br />
District and Vocational Rehabilitation was assigned to design<br />
School<br />
program. During 1963 visits were made to various places all over<br />
a<br />
United States and those ideas that impressed the team were en-<br />
the<br />
in the final draft. From the results of this study our<br />
compassed<br />
program started in the Tacoma Schools in 1964.<br />
first<br />
cooperative school/rehabilitation programs provide a<br />
The<br />
for the two agencies to organize, improve, and expand, their<br />
way<br />
and to focus them in the most meaningful way upon handi-<br />
services<br />
youth. These services encompass the broad spectrum of living<br />
capped<br />
and cultural development, personal adjustment, func-<br />
--intellectual<br />
training, personal social counseling, job training, and job<br />
tional<br />
They may include family casework services, special health<br />
placement.<br />
rehabilitative medical treatment, special recreation pro-<br />
programs,<br />
and the like. Essentially, the cooperative program commits<br />
grams,<br />
school to improve its services to the utmost with the realiza-<br />
the<br />
that these services will be fully articulated with vocational<br />
tion<br />
services, providing a continuum of assistance to the<br />
rehabilitation<br />
student while he is attending school, during the post-<br />
handicapped<br />
period, and to successful job adjustment.<br />
school<br />
rehabilitation has brought to the school setting<br />
Vocational<br />
especially adapted to handicapped students. The rehabili-<br />
services<br />
program continues to provide services after separation from<br />
tation<br />
as needed, to complete social and vocational rehabilitation.<br />
school,<br />
these services are joined effectively, the student is scarcely<br />
When<br />
of the point at which education ends and rehabilitation begins.<br />
aware<br />
end result is not only beneficial to the handicapped student but<br />
The<br />
of tremendous value to the community as well, striking directly<br />
is<br />
such serious problems as unemployment, dependency, delinquency,<br />
at<br />
human waste.<br />
and<br />
cooperative school programs are no longer experimental., they<br />
These<br />
mainline rehabilitation service here in the State of Washington<br />
are<br />
in most other states. At the present time. there are 14 school<br />
and<br />
with cooperative programs, three new ones planned for the<br />
districts<br />
of 1969, three for the fall of 1970 and 29 school districts on<br />
fall<br />
waiting list.<br />
the<br />
163
survey of eligibility indicates that approximately 50<br />
A<br />
are mentally retarded, 25.percent are behavioral problems,<br />
percent<br />
percent are emotional illness, and 13 percent various physical<br />
12<br />
handicaps.<br />
are 1,196 youngsters getting service from 15 voca"<br />
There<br />
rehabilitation officers and 63 prevocational mdvisors. The<br />
tional<br />
budget for the next biennium is 3-1/2 million dollars.<br />
contemplated<br />
of statement by Mr. Hamilton)<br />
(End<br />
Workmen's Compensation<br />
Planning Commission has taken note of task force re-<br />
The<br />
indicating dissatisfaction with the coordination of programs<br />
ports<br />
the Department of Labor and Industries and Vocational Rehab-<br />
between<br />
A number of injured workmen who are eligible for Voca-<br />
ilitation.<br />
Rehabilitation services have not been referred for those<br />
tional<br />
Most of them are not aware of their entitlement to Voca-<br />
services.<br />
Rehabilitation services. Those that are able to muddle<br />
tional<br />
even at substantial costs to themselves and their, families<br />
through<br />
so. Others following an industrial injury who would rebound with<br />
do<br />
rehabilitation services, do not get these services.and are<br />
proper<br />
handicapped. These are the ones who apply for aid to<br />
permanently<br />
totally and permanently disabled under Public Assistance, or<br />
the<br />
Security Disability grants, or in other ways become burdens<br />
Social<br />
society rather than self-supporting members of it.<br />
to<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
an illustrated brochure be prepared tailored toward<br />
That<br />
employer, physician, attorney, and insurance carrier<br />
the<br />
the services of vocational rehabilitation as<br />
describing<br />
relate to workmen s compensation.<br />
.they<br />
a reporting procedure be devised useful in the screen-<br />
That<br />
and evaluation of industrially .injured cases that could<br />
ing<br />
benefit by vocational rehabilitation services<br />
a result of thisrecommendation a committee composed<br />
As<br />
staff members from Vocational Rehabilitation and the Department<br />
of<br />
Labor and Industry has begun to meet to effect the recommended<br />
of<br />
changes.<br />
recommendation under consideration by the Planning<br />
Another<br />
is quoted as follows:<br />
Commission<br />
the Buckner Rehabilitation Center operated by the<br />
Transform<br />
of Labor and Industries in Seattle into a com-<br />
Department<br />
rehabilitation center to service injured workmen<br />
prehensive<br />
others.<br />
and<br />
Problems may delay the implementation of this recommendation.<br />
164
a meeting of the Planning Commission in December 1968,<br />
At<br />
Harold Petrie, Director of the Department of Labor and Industries,<br />
Mr.<br />
to the statement written by John B. Welsh, Jr., in Chapter<br />
objected<br />
p. 72, of REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE, PROGRAMS PROVIDED<br />
9,<br />
BY STATE AGENCIES:<br />
question then becomes whether the Department of Labor<br />
The<br />
Industries of the Division of Vocational Rehabili-<br />
and<br />
can provide the better service to the injured<br />
tation<br />
It is to be noted, however, that if such re-<br />
workman.<br />
and job placement services could be provided by<br />
ferral<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation the funds<br />
the<br />
for them would be tripled because of the<br />
available<br />
matching grant formula.<br />
federal<br />
Interagency Coordination of Service Prosrams<br />
agreements for cooperative action between<br />
Interagency<br />
Rehabilitation and several other state, agencies have<br />
Vocational<br />
since 1945. Copies of the agreements were not generally<br />
existed<br />
except from the agency files. One of the first major<br />
available<br />
of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
efforts<br />
to assemble descriptions of each of the major agencies pro-<br />
was<br />
rehabilitation services to handicapped, and disadvantaged<br />
viding<br />
Where cooperative agreements were in effect these were<br />
people.<br />
as part of the record of coordination. These and other<br />
secured<br />
were made available through the cooperation of the Di-<br />
documents<br />
vision of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
contract with the Washington State Legislative Council,<br />
A<br />
nonpartisan agency created to serve the State Legislature, assured<br />
a<br />
legal counsel for this study.<br />
material was published in June 1968, in a book by<br />
This<br />
C. Carson, E. M. Oliver, and John B. Welsh, Jr., entitled,<br />
David<br />
IN WASHINGTON STATE, PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY STATE<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
Copies were provided governmental agencies, members of<br />
AGENCIES.<br />
Legislature, accredited high schools, professional staff members<br />
the<br />
the several agencies involved, Federal officials, and the like.<br />
of<br />
in REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE is a de-<br />
Included<br />
of the Vocational Rehabilitation program, the Federal<br />
scription<br />
as amended through 1967, the State law concerning Vocational<br />
law<br />
the most current interagency agreements between<br />
Rehabilitation,<br />
Rehabilitation and other governmental agencies and,<br />
Vocational<br />
a description of six agencies providing vocational rehabili-<br />
lastly,<br />
tation services to handicapped individuals. These six agencies are:<br />
165
of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Division<br />
of Health<br />
Department<br />
of Institutions<br />
Department<br />
of Labor and Industries<br />
Department<br />
of Public Assistamce<br />
Department<br />
Security Department<br />
Employment<br />
Washington State the agency providing vocational rehabilitation<br />
In<br />
to the blind is part of the Department of Public Assistance.<br />
services<br />
cannot simply be achieved,<br />
Coordination<br />
principle, at the federal level. The efforts<br />
in<br />
really count, those that will pay the divi-<br />
that<br />
begin where the service is, where the<br />
dends,<br />
for it exists, and where a willingness to<br />
need<br />
to improve services is essential-- the<br />
organize<br />
Therefore would like to stress the<br />
community.<br />
of community-oriented efforts to bring<br />
importance<br />
service more efficiently and more practic-<br />
better<br />
to people. I believe that such efforts can<br />
ally<br />
place under almost any setting or any spon-<br />
take<br />
that one chooses.<br />
sorship<br />
E. Switzer, Administrator<br />
Mary<br />
and Rehabilitation Service, in an<br />
Social<br />
to the National Rehabilitation<br />
address<br />
New Orleans, La., October 1968<br />
Association,<br />
December 1968, a two-day meeting of the Planning Com-<br />
In<br />
was held in order to hear state directors discuss programs<br />
mission<br />
Health, Institutions, Labor & Industries, Public Assistance, and<br />
in<br />
Security. The description of these state programs aug-<br />
Employment<br />
the written description published earlier in the year in<br />
mented<br />
IN WASHINGTON STATE.<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
chairman's opening remarks at the meeting were appro-<br />
The<br />
as he reflected the feeling of Commission members in his<br />
priate<br />
that the work of the Commission had reached a point where<br />
statement<br />
was a need to talk directly to state agencies regarding voca-<br />
there<br />
rehabilitation goals for the future. This first-hand know-<br />
tional<br />
he said, will be used by the Commission in writing its final<br />
ledge,<br />
which will contain recommendations for. providing vocational<br />
report<br />
services to all handicapped citizens in Washington<br />
rehabilitation<br />
State by 1975.<br />
166
first speaker on the morning program was MR. WILLIAM POPE, Assistant<br />
The<br />
Division of Social Services, Department of Public Assistance. His<br />
Director,<br />
remarks and the discussion they prompted are summarized.<br />
POPE began by commenting that perhaps he could serve the Commission best<br />
MR.<br />
making himself available for questiens and that he would be glad to do this.<br />
by<br />
State Department of Public Assistance, he continued, has two basic responsi-<br />
The<br />
under both State and Federal law. The first of these, and the one for<br />
bilities<br />
the department is best known, is to provide direct'financial assistance to<br />
which<br />
in need. This aid may be in the form of direct payments to the individual;<br />
those<br />
it may be provided through the purchase by.the department of such services<br />
or,<br />
medical and nursing home care, child care, .etc..<br />
as<br />
second major responsibility is to provide services that help the individ-<br />
The<br />
These are broad and varied. MR. POPE listed protective services, primarily<br />
ual.<br />
children; referral services. such as job placement, job training job finding,<br />
for<br />
well as referral to other state and community agencies or resources; direct<br />
as<br />
or counseling services provided to children, in their own homes, to-<br />
casework<br />
parents, to families; indirect services which help an individual to estab-<br />
unmarried<br />
his right to her services such as benefits from the Veterans Administration,<br />
lish<br />
payments from a father, and others.<br />
support<br />
of the department services are habilitative as well as rehabilitative<br />
Many<br />
nature. They try to help the.individual to examine his own resources, to help<br />
in<br />
himself, and to move from dependency to self-sufficiency.<br />
of the services are given because they have been requested by the individ-<br />
Some<br />
who is in financial need and thus eligible for them. The service is given as<br />
ual<br />
as it is required or until the person ceases to be eligible for it. Other<br />
long<br />
such as protective services, adoptive services, referral services, are<br />
services,<br />
regardless of the financial need of the individual. These are available<br />
extended<br />
the high and low earner alike.<br />
to<br />
department policy in helping people, MR. POPE said, is to consider and<br />
The<br />
use of all appropriate resources.. To .this end individual resources are<br />
make<br />
The law is quite specific about financial resources. Depending upon<br />
examined.<br />
nature of the individual need, the program then asks whether another community<br />
the<br />
state agency might better provide the help needed. If vocational rehabilita-<br />
or<br />
help is needed, the individual is referred to the Division of Vocational<br />
tion<br />
If a community agency is equipped to serve this person with<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
services, the referral is made there. The services available through<br />
necessary<br />
Red Cross, the veterans' organizations, UGN, and other volunteer programs are<br />
the<br />
Public Assistance does not try to do the job alone, Mr. Pope added.<br />
explored.<br />
must be aware of and use whatever resources exist within the community.<br />
Caseworkers<br />
of services by other departments is avoided, to the maximum extent<br />
Duplication<br />
possible.<br />
POPE provided the following figures on the number of persons who were<br />
MR.<br />
assistance during the month of September, 1968:<br />
given<br />
Age Assistance (OAA) 24,500 persons<br />
Old<br />
to Families with<br />
Aid<br />
Depehdent Children (AFDC) 66,000 of which 47,000 were children<br />
167
to Blind (AB) 543<br />
Aid<br />
Assistance (DI) ii,000<br />
Disability<br />
Assistance (GA) 13,000<br />
General<br />
certified to Medical Care 138,335<br />
Total<br />
children helped through<br />
Total<br />
Welfare Services 13,795"<br />
Child<br />
in this figure" 5,000 children living with their own parents;<br />
*Included<br />
children in foster care; and 700 children in'children's institutions.<br />
6,000<br />
POPE described the Services for the Blind, a major vocational rehabili-<br />
MR.<br />
program for which the Department of Public Assistance is given specific<br />
tation<br />
under Washington State Law (RCW 74.16.181), as permitted by the<br />
responsibility<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation Act. The program operates under a state plan<br />
Federal<br />
is first reviewed at the state level and then submitted to the U. S. Depart-<br />
that<br />
of Health, Education, and Welfare for approval. Funding is presently 75<br />
ment<br />
Federal money, 25 percent State. Three principal components of this<br />
percent<br />
are: vocational rehabilitation, prevention of blindness, and home teach-<br />
program<br />
ing.<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation Services of the Services..for the Blind<br />
Services for the Blind is operated under the same Federal Regulations<br />
The<br />
govern the program of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Eligibility<br />
that<br />
criteria in the State law provide that a person is eligible who has:<br />
No vision or whose vision with glasses is so defective as<br />
a.<br />
prevent the performance of certain activities for which<br />
to<br />
is essential, or has an eye condition of a pro-<br />
eyesight<br />
nature which may lead to blindness;<br />
gressive<br />
The existence of a substantial handicap to employment<br />
b.<br />
by the limitation resulting from such disability;<br />
caused<br />
A reasonable expectation that vocational rehabilitation<br />
c.<br />
may render the individual fit to engage in a<br />
ervices<br />
remunerative occupation.<br />
list o services which may be provided is basically the same as those<br />
The<br />
from the Division. They include; diagnostic services, training and<br />
available<br />
materials, physical restoration services, transportation, maintenance,<br />
training<br />
tools, equipment, initial stocks and supplies and occupational license,<br />
placement,<br />
and interpreter services, other goods and services necessary to determine<br />
reader<br />
individual's rehabilitation potential or to render him fit to participate in<br />
the<br />
a gainful occupation.<br />
the Randolph Shepherd Act, a vending stand program is operated. Last<br />
Under<br />
36 stands were operated, earning an average income of $6,862 for blind<br />
year,<br />
operators.<br />
comprehensive rehabilitation training center for the blind is operated by<br />
A<br />
program in Seattle. Evaluation and adjustment services are provided here to<br />
the<br />
residents. Residents from other states in this region are accepted<br />
Washington<br />
a fee-for-service based upon the actual cost of providing rehabilitation services.<br />
on<br />
the fiscl year ending June 30, 1968, 158 persons were served in the center,<br />
For<br />
31 from neighboring states.<br />
including<br />
168
program operates with a staff of 45 full-time and three part-time<br />
The<br />
employees.<br />
Prevention of Blindness<br />
for the prevention of blindness have been authorized in the State<br />
Services<br />
1937 in a program that is focused on the provision ofmedical care for eye<br />
since<br />
in which sight is endangered or sight can be mproved. Eligibility<br />
conditions<br />
determined on the basis of need by SDPA county offices. Approximately one-<br />
is<br />
of the cost is provided by Federal funds and two-thirds by State money.<br />
third<br />
conittee of eight practicing ophthalmologists acts in an advisory capacity to<br />
A<br />
the Services for the Blind unit.<br />
Teacher-Counselor<br />
State Law (RCV 74,16,181) authorizes the Department to provide<br />
Washington<br />
service and the teaching of subjects which will assist visually<br />
teacher-counselor<br />
persons in the "ease and enjoyment of daily living." The program has<br />
handicapped<br />
its primary aim the development of self-reliance in the blind person to help<br />
as<br />
adjust to daily living requirements. Counseling is provided, and the only<br />
him<br />
requirement is a visual deficiency requiring the service. There are<br />
eligibility<br />
financial requirements and no fees are charged. The program is funded with<br />
no<br />
percent Federal money and 60 percent.in State funds.<br />
40<br />
is to be noted that Mr. Carson, in his statement of November 14, 1968, on<br />
It<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation services in State Government, recommended<br />
organization<br />
the Services to the Blind unit be moved to the Division of Vocational Rehabili-<br />
that<br />
Mr. Carson's statement is in Section 7 of the Agenda items.<br />
tation.<br />
Department of Public Assistance, MR POPE said in concluding his account<br />
The<br />
services, is the state agency designated by law to process disability claims<br />
of<br />
the Social Security Administration program. This is a unit of the Depart-<br />
under<br />
with 37 employees which is presently adjudicating an average o£ 250 cases<br />
ment<br />
per week.<br />
Disability Determination Unit of Social Security was also recommended<br />
This<br />
Mr. Carson to be in the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
by<br />
DISCUSSION:<br />
GRIDLEY asked whether severely retarded persons could qualify for foster<br />
MRS.<br />
under the present law. MR. POPE replied that foster home care, theoretically,<br />
care<br />
available, especially if the applicant for care is a child. Placement for the<br />
is<br />
adult, however, is more difficult. The foster home care program for<br />
retarded<br />
is just beginning. No satisfactory solution to the entire problem of<br />
adults<br />
living quarters for these people while they are in training has yet<br />
providing<br />
developed. The Services for the Blind has a similar problem finding places<br />
been<br />
their trainees.<br />
for<br />
RIDDER asked how peoplelearned about the services of the Department,<br />
SENATOR<br />
they camefor service. People generally seek aid from the Department, MR. POPE<br />
how<br />
because they know it is one of the agencies in the community which can give<br />
said,<br />
or can direct the applicant to another agency where service is available.<br />
service<br />
169
Department does little outreach except in the case of protective services<br />
The<br />
to a small degree, for Services for the Blind. Some schools of thought<br />
and,<br />
outreach as part of the program. The Federal agency, for example,<br />
recommend<br />
like to see this effort made. Many referrals from other agencies are made<br />
would<br />
directly to the Department.<br />
ADAMS commented that in some states financial eligibility for public<br />
DR.<br />
is being determined on a statement from the applicant. No investiga-<br />
assistance<br />
is made, it is said. The Federal Government is asking states to move in<br />
tion<br />
direction, MR. POPE said, using the relief applicant's statement of need<br />
this<br />
the primary source of information in the determination of his eligibility.<br />
as<br />
i0 percent of the accepted cases would have their statements checked under<br />
Only<br />
spot check system similar to that used by the Internal Revenue Service.<br />
a<br />
statements would result in a mandatory referral to the Prosecuting<br />
Fraudulent<br />
for court action. Frauldulant statements made in relation to the receipt<br />
Attorney<br />
public assistance are considered "gross misdemeanors."<br />
of<br />
FREEN requested information on the residence eligibility requirements<br />
MR.<br />
public assistance payments. Mr. POPE volunteered his personal opinion that<br />
for<br />
an eligibility requirement at the state level was not right, that an individ-<br />
such<br />
should have the freedom to move across state lines without losing his right<br />
ual<br />
to assistance.<br />
EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT<br />
bXINE DALY, Commissioner, Employment Security Department, was the<br />
MRS.<br />
speaker on the morning program. She expressed.her pleasure in appearing<br />
second<br />
the Commission and spoke of the excellent working relationship existing<br />
before<br />
the Department and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. For infor-<br />
between<br />
regarding the Department's program and objectives she referred Commission<br />
mation<br />
to the report, Rehabilitation in Washington State, which she said described<br />
members<br />
well the work of her department. Since th-¢ report was prepared, however, some<br />
very<br />
programs have been developed. One of these, mandated to the Department by<br />
new<br />
law, is the Work Incentive Program (WIN). Another is the Concentrated<br />
Federal<br />
.Program being carried on in the Seattle Central Area. She asked<br />
Employment<br />
MR. PAUL PEMBERTON to describe the WIN Program.<br />
WIN Program, MR. PEMBERTON said, we cannot claim a cuccess. We must<br />
The<br />
with him for 60 days of intensive follow-up if necessary to assure that he<br />
stay<br />
retain his job. Proposals have been made to expand these services to other<br />
will<br />
on the Public Assistance rolls who could benefit from the program.<br />
individuals<br />
Between 2000 and 2500 people have been referred to the program since September.<br />
DALY called WIN one of the most exciting programs within the Employment<br />
MRS.<br />
Department. It has been done on a highly cooperative basis, involving<br />
Security<br />
assistance, vocational rehabilitation, and has demonstrated how well<br />
public<br />
of government can work together. She then asked Mr. James W. Harris<br />
agencies<br />
to comment on program developments in the area of human resources.<br />
HARRIS noted that the service program started with the individual,<br />
.<br />
to answer the question, why is he unemployed? Sometimes there are no<br />
seeking<br />
in the community and the solution may lie in moving to where jobs are<br />
jobs<br />
He may need training, or he may have a handicap which keeps him<br />
available.<br />
from employment. Perhaps he cannot be employed because he is black, or becoming<br />
170
The program begins with an assessment of the individual and seeks to find<br />
old.<br />
his community the resources necessary to overcome barriers to employment.<br />
within<br />
plan for solving the. problem includes bringing in representatives of other<br />
The<br />
who can furnish needed resources on a coordinated and cooperative basis.<br />
agencies<br />
DISCUSSION:<br />
RIDDER asked what was considered satisfactQry placement for the<br />
SENATOR<br />
being helped. MR. HARRIS commented that most persons would strive for<br />
persons<br />
as far up the emplonent ladder as his intelligence and amibitfon will<br />
placement<br />
him. MR. PEMBERTON added that in the WIN/Program they may follow up on an<br />
take<br />
for as long as eight months. One of the assumptions in the past has<br />
individual<br />
that the individual aided by a service program will make it on his own.<br />
been<br />
is not always true. The WIN Program tries to stay with their clients until<br />
This<br />
is well on his way.<br />
he<br />
MR. FREEN's question regarding the provision of transportation for<br />
To<br />
on the WIN program . PEMBERTON replied that this was not customary,<br />
persons<br />
but that the service was available in some areas.<br />
DALY agreed that the problem of transportation was only one of many<br />
MRS.<br />
which the Department deals. The barriers to employment are many and varied<br />
with<br />
may involve the lack of day care centers, problems of salary garnishment,<br />
and<br />
to secure bonding, employment requirements, high school diploma require-<br />
inability<br />
to name a few. She also mentioned briefly an intensive outreach program<br />
ments,<br />
the number of employment offices located in population centers. The Washing-<br />
and<br />
ton Indian is a target of the outreach program, too.<br />
CARSON made the comment that the Denny Committee, the Governor's Task<br />
MR.<br />
on Executive Organization, has made a recommendation for a Department<br />
Force<br />
Manpower and Industry which would be composed of the present Employment<br />
of<br />
Department, the Department of Labor and Industries, and the Division<br />
Security<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation. He asked MRS. DALY if she thought this could be<br />
of<br />
practical organization. S. DALY replied that they had just received copies<br />
a<br />
the report, and that their staff had not discussed it, but that she thought<br />
of<br />
would be workable. MR. CARSON remarked that MRS. DALY had mentioned their<br />
it<br />
with the Department of Labor and Industries to which she responded<br />
relationship,<br />
it was very good.<br />
that<br />
HEALTH DEPARTMENT<br />
PEYTON introduced DR. JESS SPIELHOLZ, Deputy Director, State Depart-<br />
MR.<br />
of Health, and DR. RHESA PENN, former Acting Head of the Crippld Children's<br />
ment<br />
A summary of DR. PENN'S comments on the services of the Crippled<br />
Services.<br />
Services follows.<br />
Children's<br />
Service, DR, PENN said, originated underthe Social ecuri.ty Act of<br />
The<br />
The legal basis for the service in the state is contained in Washington<br />
196.<br />
law, Chapter 129, Laws of 1941. The purpose of the service is to help<br />
State<br />
that children of the state havethe best possible chance to become<br />
assure<br />
healthy contributing adults.<br />
Four general areas of service characterize the program. These are prevention,<br />
171
diagnostic services, and treatment. The preventive aspects of<br />
casefinding,<br />
program are concerned with the early identification of conditions that<br />
the<br />
lead to handicapping defects, and include treatment to break this train<br />
may<br />
events and services to reduce the degree of disability when primary or<br />
of<br />
secondary prevention is not possible.<br />
is concerned with the promotion of understanding leading to<br />
Casefinding<br />
of potentially handicapping conditions, and early identification.<br />
suspicion<br />
are encouraged from sources likely to have contact with children<br />
Referrals<br />
are handicapped or potentially handicapped The service also participates<br />
who<br />
promotes screening programs for early identification and supports referrals<br />
and<br />
diagnostic facilities where help may be provided through education and<br />
to<br />
counseling and assistance given in overcoming obstacles.<br />
services are part of the program to assist in assuring there<br />
Diagnostic<br />
appropriate evaluation of each child suspected of having an actual or<br />
is<br />
potential handicap.<br />
services look to the development of a plan that goes beyond<br />
Treatment<br />
immediate goal of correcting a defect, or decreasing its effect to provid-<br />
the<br />
assistance toward the achievement of a long term goal that of becoming<br />
ing<br />
healthy contributing adult.<br />
a<br />
in the service exist, DR. PENN said, primarily because of<br />
Limitations<br />
funds, leading to limited personnel. He noted two general restric-<br />
restricted<br />
tions, one in medical eligibility, a second in financial eligibility.<br />
eligibility limits the program generally to relatively severe<br />
Medical<br />
chronic conditions where there is a reasonable hope for improvement under<br />
and<br />
A list of these conditions would include the following: congenital<br />
treatment.<br />
of the cardiovascular systems, and, to a limitedextent, of the central<br />
defects<br />
system, the genito-urinary system, and gastrointestinal system, ortho-<br />
nervous<br />
defects (including amputation); conditions leading to loss of hearing;<br />
pedic<br />
requiring plastic reconstruction; cleft lip and palate; metabolic disor-<br />
defects<br />
possibly leading to mental retardation.<br />
ders<br />
eligibility does not apply to casefinding and some supportive<br />
Financial<br />
and diagnostic services. It does apply to specific treatment services.<br />
care<br />
general, a family of four with anincome of less than $4,000 is eligible,<br />
In<br />
consideration is given to other factors. In borderline cases the family<br />
but<br />
is encouraged to help with payments, or to reimburse the agency.<br />
PENN provided the following figures showing services provided for<br />
DR.<br />
period July i, 1967 through June 30, 1968.<br />
the<br />
Total number of children receiving physician services: 4,193<br />
total number of conditions tabulated for the 4,193 children who<br />
The<br />
services was 4,588..<br />
received<br />
172
Major categories of dagnosis"<br />
palsy 451<br />
Cerebral<br />
with hearing 1,219<br />
Associated<br />
conditions 969<br />
Musculoskeletal<br />
heart malformations 117<br />
Congenital<br />
Cleft lip and palate 424<br />
TOTAL CONDITIONS 4,588<br />
for future development will be directed toward improving the<br />
Efforts<br />
of home communities to provide care in each of the categories of<br />
capacity<br />
listed in the foreoin table. Other goals will include efforts to<br />
service<br />
that outside assistance is available to meet needs not provided for<br />
assure<br />
the commun±ty. Improvements in fnding will be sought to meet rising<br />
within<br />
to cover categories not presently covered (such as cystic fibrosis,<br />
costs,<br />
neurologic disorders) and to assure.complete, rather than partial<br />
epilepsy,<br />
of needs in implementing plans for treatment. Implied in the latter<br />
meeting<br />
is the development of broader and more specific agreements with resources<br />
goal<br />
than the Crippled Children's Services.<br />
other<br />
16,000 children have eligible defects as compared with the 4,000+<br />
Some<br />
in 1968, DR. PENN pointed out.<br />
served<br />
pattern we hope to develop in the future, DR. PENN concluded, is based<br />
The<br />
the belief that each individual should be under a life-long system of<br />
upon<br />
improvement which would help him understand himself as an individual,<br />
health<br />
and.why he functions as he does, and the value of this individuality both<br />
how<br />
himself and in others. He should know that health is an asset in achieving<br />
in<br />
individual potential and know what to do to promote it and also how to<br />
his<br />
and avoid health hazards. When unavoidable health problems occur he<br />
perceive<br />
meet.them in a way to diminish detrimental effects and he should be<br />
should<br />
aware of and practice specific preventive measures.<br />
development of such a system exceeds the capacity of traditional health<br />
The<br />
and health programs, public and private. Ideally, it must include<br />
professionals<br />
fields of education, social welfare, economics and others, and will require<br />
the<br />
use of a very broad spectrum of personnel whose educational level extends<br />
the<br />
from almost none to highly specialized professionals.<br />
such a broad system for health improvement, the need will exist<br />
Under<br />
dealing with potential or actual handicaps. The capabilities developed<br />
for<br />
the Crippled Children's Services, whether continued under that name or<br />
under<br />
will have an important contribution to make, DR. PENN stated.<br />
another,<br />
such a system, primary prevention would be the most important<br />
Under<br />
with individual needs the basic guiding factor, and a complete meet-<br />
service,<br />
ing of these needs the uitimate goal.<br />
SPIELHOLZ, following DR. PENN, conented that the Crippled Children's<br />
DR.<br />
is one of several units within a broader spectrum. It is not an<br />
Service<br />
173
service, but is integrated with other services provided by the Depart-<br />
isolated<br />
of Health. Over the years, he added, the Department has had a contract<br />
ment<br />
the Division of Vocational Reh.bilitation, providing for methods of referral<br />
with<br />
the two agencies and defining areas where there is mutual interest.<br />
between<br />
mutually satisfactory relationship between the Division and the<br />
Another<br />
has been in effect for many years, DR. SPIELHO&Z said. This is a<br />
Department<br />
arrangement at the community level where local health officers (who<br />
working<br />
physicians in the field of public health) provide medical consultation<br />
are<br />
local vocational rehabilitation officers. The 39 counties of the state are<br />
to<br />
into 25 health districts, each with a health officer. In a few of<br />
divided<br />
these a practicing physician serves as a part-time health officer.<br />
are still unique among the states, DR. SPIELHOLZ emphasized, in this<br />
We<br />
between health officers and vocational counselors, a relationship<br />
relationship<br />
was first developed on a voluntary basis and was then continued under a<br />
which<br />
agreement between the two agencies. The health officer is avail-<br />
cooperative<br />
to the counselor for reviewing cases, for helping with the solution of<br />
able<br />
problems, and sometimes serves by directing attention to community<br />
medical<br />
resources which might be useful in the rehabilitation process.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
SENATOR RIDDER'S question about the provision of medical services,<br />
To<br />
SPIELHOLZ explained that the role of the medical consultant was not to give<br />
DR.<br />
medical services, but to provide medical advice, to help the counselor<br />
direct<br />
the case, to point out resources in the community, and to insure<br />
understand<br />
the medical components of a case be integrated. In the day-to-day opera-<br />
that<br />
of the Crippled Children's Service, the program concern is primarily<br />
tion<br />
children with complicated conditions who need not only medical skills,<br />
with<br />
help in social and vocational adjustment. A staffing is part of the plan<br />
but<br />
each case and may involve school people, a vocational counselor,.a public<br />
for<br />
caseworker and others. The whole child and what happens to him is<br />
assistance<br />
important.<br />
GRIDLEY asked about services for the emotionally disturbed child and<br />
MRS.<br />
family.<br />
his<br />
SPIELHOLZ replied that the philosophy of the program is to give help<br />
DR.<br />
families to aid in the early identification of any deviation from normal<br />
to<br />
Psychiatric clinics throughout the state are able to refer any case<br />
behavior.<br />
the local health officer.<br />
to<br />
ADAMS described briefly the Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children<br />
DR.<br />
Spokane where facilities, money and staff are available to take care of any<br />
in<br />
child in the state who meets their requirements.<br />
reply to a question about an orthodontia program, DR. SPIELHOLZ agreed<br />
In<br />
services were important and frequently very necessary. Two factors,<br />
these<br />
slowed the program: excessive costs, and the scarcity of orthodon-<br />
however,<br />
The dental program, he said, was developing very slowly.<br />
tists.<br />
174
PIELHOLZ concluded by saying that the public health program feels<br />
DR.<br />
close to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, both in goals and<br />
very<br />
methods. Whatever structure develops, he expressed the hope that it would<br />
in<br />
the present relationship.<br />
strengthen<br />
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES<br />
PEYTON introduced . HAROLD PETRIE, Director, State Department of<br />
MR.<br />
and Industries, who began his remarks b X expressing concern over the<br />
Labor<br />
of planning bodies at work, naming the comprehensive health plan-<br />
multiplicity<br />
agency, the Planning Commission for Vocat'ionai Rehabilitation, and the<br />
ning<br />
Reorganization Committee. He suggested that perhaps a coordinator to<br />
Denny<br />
all planning activities might be in order.<br />
coordinate<br />
between the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the<br />
Relationships<br />
of Labor and Industries have been very amiable throughout the years,<br />
Department<br />
said, and hopefully will remain that way. The function of the Department<br />
he<br />
defined by law and its rehabilitation efforts are limited to physical restora-<br />
is<br />
services for injured workmen. The Department's goal is to return the<br />
tion<br />
worker to employment as soon as possible. The Division's goal, he<br />
injured<br />
thought, was somewhat broader in its scope and viewpoint.<br />
a survey of workers covered by the Department MR. PETRIE provided<br />
From<br />
following figures: Between 600,000 and 700,000 workers are under the<br />
the<br />
industrial insurance program; in any one annual period 123,000 to 125,000<br />
state<br />
be injured, and about 80 percent will require the one-time services of a<br />
will<br />
20,000 22,000 will be injured severely enough to keep them away<br />
physician;<br />
work for three days or more; 4,000 of the latter will end up with permanent<br />
from<br />
residuals, more than half of themback injuries.<br />
the 4,000, 135 will sustain fatalinjuries; between 130 and 150 will<br />
Of<br />
declared totally and permanently disabled. It is with this group, somewhere<br />
be<br />
iS0 and 4,000 that serious problems in rehabilitation occur for the<br />
between<br />
Department.<br />
PETRIE drew attention to statements in Rehabilitation in. Washingo n<br />
MR.<br />
referring to page 71where the sentences appear: "The Department of<br />
State,<br />
and Industries administers the Industrial Insurance (Title 51RCW) which<br />
Labor<br />
the necessary compensation, time-loss from job and medical aid<br />
provides<br />
for workers injured within the scope of extrahazardous employment.<br />
benefits<br />
degree of rehabilitation involved includes physical conditioning and job-<br />
The<br />
services which the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation could easily<br />
placement<br />
provide."<br />
the top of page 72, MR. PETRIE also read this statement: "It is<br />
From<br />
be noted, however, that if such referral and job placement services could<br />
to<br />
provided by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, the funds available<br />
be<br />
them would be tripled because of. the federal matching grant formula."<br />
for<br />
PETRIE said he hoped there was no correlation between these two<br />
MR.<br />
and that they did no.t suggest that the Division should assume the<br />
statements<br />
175
of job placement, either partially or exclusively, for Labor and Industry<br />
role<br />
The Division, he continued, should have no anxieties regarding the<br />
cases.<br />
center operated by the Department, since the Department does<br />
rehabilitation<br />
in any sense attempt to maintain a total rehabilitation center as the<br />
not<br />
term is understood by rehabilitation people.<br />
Department, V[R. PETRIE continued, has a responsibility to return<br />
The<br />
to gainful employment as soon as possible, an obligation which they<br />
workers<br />
to both employer and employee, and one which they attempt to meet and will<br />
owe<br />
to meet with whatever tools are available. To meet this responsi-<br />
continue<br />
he feels it is quite necessary to havenot only professionally trained<br />
bility<br />
available, but also people with a day-to-day knowledge of the<br />
counselors<br />
field. This is the reason for maintaining an active relationship<br />
employment<br />
the Division and with Employment Security a relationship which Labor<br />
with<br />
Industries has no intention of disturbing. The Department also calls upon<br />
and<br />
officials who are aware of employment possibilities within a given<br />
labor<br />
and upon maagement, too, for the quickest possible placement,<br />
community,<br />
job placement seems to be the answer for any given person.<br />
whenever<br />
PETRIE described as "gray areas" those situations where one group<br />
MR.<br />
look at an individual and say that DVR training is needed while another<br />
might<br />
group-might say that only job placement is needed.<br />
costs for the injuredworker who does not go back to work are<br />
Pension<br />
Thirty thousand dollars is needed to establish a monthly income for<br />
high.<br />
worker for the rest of his life. The actual charge assessed against the<br />
that<br />
is $19,750 an amount which is a great incentive for him to see that<br />
employer<br />
accidents do not happen.<br />
are helpful in effortsto return an Employers injured to a job,<br />
workman<br />
PETRIE said. Difficulties are encountered with the small employer who<br />
MR.<br />
not be able to restructure his.work e£fort to re-employ the injured worker.<br />
may<br />
larger employer is usually able to make room for his own injuredworker,<br />
The<br />
is unwilling to take on a worker injured while working for another employer.<br />
but<br />
this injured worker requires a great deal of emplo,ent "know how."<br />
Placing<br />
understanding of the industrial insurance law, and the Labor and Industries<br />
an<br />
program.<br />
LARSON asked how the second injury clause in the State Industrial<br />
MR.<br />
Act affected the rehiring of a worker.<br />
Insurance<br />
PETRIE described Washington's "Second Injury Fund" as being broad<br />
MR.<br />
the sense that all pre-existing disabilities are considered when disability<br />
in<br />
is made between the second injury and prior disabilities; but is<br />
apportionment<br />
or restrictive in the sense that it can only be applied when a workman<br />
narrow<br />
placed on the total and permanent disability rolls. In other words, there<br />
is<br />
be no cost apportionment when disability is temporary only.<br />
can<br />
such time as the Second Injury Fund is applied, a physician is asked<br />
At<br />
respond to the theoretical question, "What wouldthis workman's disability<br />
to<br />
been (resulting from.the industrial injury) if he did not in fact have<br />
have<br />
pre-existing disability?" The employer's cost experience is then assessed<br />
any<br />
only with the amount of such limited disability and not the cost of the<br />
176
esulting from the combined effects of the second injury and pre-<br />
disability<br />
disability.<br />
existing<br />
working with DVR, MR. PETRIE added, the Department feels that at no<br />
In<br />
can it abdicate any of its responsibility and say to DVR, "This is yours,<br />
time<br />
take over." Each claim calls for the most particular kind of cooperation<br />
you<br />
the two agencies. Statutory authority has been requested to give Labor<br />
between<br />
Industries the right to carry a workman on time los disability after he<br />
and<br />
reached maximum physical restoration. Many times the man's physician may<br />
has<br />
the workman is ready for re-employment, but the man himself is not ready<br />
say<br />
he does not have a job, and does not know how to apply for one. The<br />
because<br />
cannot close out this claim until the man is back at work. It<br />
Department<br />
to carry the workman in a temporary disability status, continuing his<br />
attempts<br />
until the time when a job is found for him and he is at work in that<br />
benefits<br />
This is done daily with the help of the Division of Vocational Rehabili-<br />
job.<br />
tation.<br />
commenting on the second injury clause DR. ADAMS remarked that because<br />
In<br />
the law there is an understandable reluctance on the part of the employer<br />
of<br />
hire people with a previous disability. He. thought some type of waiver<br />
to<br />
indicated. Later he asked why should a man who lost an arm in a hunting<br />
was<br />
transfer the cost of that injury on to his employer. Another meer<br />
accident<br />
that the employer would probably rather hire someone who didn't have<br />
commented<br />
a problem to start with.<br />
PINTO wondered what happened to the workman when the employer payment<br />
MRS.<br />
stopped.<br />
PETRIE replied that of the 23,000 injured workers, only a few end up<br />
MR.<br />
a permanent disability. The claim is closed when a man is ready to go<br />
with<br />
to work. Labor and Industries does not have funds to pay for training.<br />
back<br />
only thing the Department can do is make direct payments to the workman.<br />
The<br />
does not try to maintain any type of training facility or program. This<br />
It<br />
paid"for by the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. The Department tries<br />
is<br />
find out as .soon as possible after an injury whether a potential problem<br />
to<br />
for the Workman. Most of the problems develop after the man stays off<br />
exists<br />
work for 60 days or more.<br />
question from MRS. GRIDLEY drew the response from MR. PETRIE that the<br />
A<br />
merger of departments recommended in the Denny report would not cause<br />
proposed<br />
the Department any problems.<br />
OLIVER commented as the discussion closed that the Division, in<br />
MR.<br />
to a request from k. PETRIE, intends to increase the number of DVR<br />
response<br />
assigned to Labor and Industry cases. He added that the 1945 work-<br />
counselors<br />
agreement between the two agencies had been very satisfactory.<br />
ing<br />
DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS<br />
CONTE began by saying he was very glad to have an opportunity to<br />
DR.<br />
on the very broad and exciting subject of rehabilitation where steps<br />
speak<br />
now being taken to accomplish an oft-stated goal to make vocational<br />
are<br />
services possible and available to all residents of the state.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
177
esidents in our state institutions, numbering 12,000, are part of<br />
The<br />
total residents of the state to whom services should be available, he said.<br />
the<br />
relationship between the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and<br />
The<br />
Department of Institutions is historical, he continued. Over the course<br />
the<br />
a ten-year tenure in Washington, he reported, he has had.the assistance<br />
of<br />
the DVR staff in the state hospitals and in the corrections program. One<br />
of<br />
the problems they have faced together is that they hve never had adequate<br />
of<br />
In the state hospitals, a population of 7,000 had the services of<br />
coverage.<br />
a Division counselor for one day a month. This, DR. CONTE noted, is frustrating.<br />
a relationship that has been plagued by manpower shortages, he felt<br />
For<br />
one between the two agencies had been very good. Every conceivable topic '-<br />
the<br />
employment, and rehabilitation has been discussed. The interest<br />
training<br />
been unlimited, but the frustration has been profound.<br />
has<br />
a new relationship is beginning, marked by new interest, because new<br />
Now<br />
have recently become available. The Department and the Division at the<br />
funds<br />
level have entered into a memorandum of understanding containing two<br />
state<br />
proposals: [i) to make vocational rehabilitation services available<br />
important<br />
individuals in institutions who may be eligible for such services under the<br />
to<br />
Plan and the Federal Rehabilitation Act;and (2) to overcome the manpower<br />
State<br />
by building a rehabilitation Staff through a training Program for<br />
shortage<br />
vocational rehabilitation officers. Everyone involved in this train-<br />
beginning<br />
effort is in a position to further vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
ing<br />
DR. CONTE continued, the Department wants to see the 12,000<br />
Specifically,<br />
of state institutions included in this total goal. This does not<br />
residents<br />
that all of the 12,000 are in need of rehabilitation services, but this<br />
mean<br />
must be given attention so that those in need may be singled out. The<br />
segment<br />
clientele is there among the mentally ill, the mentally retarded, the<br />
potential<br />
offender, the adult offender, the probationer and parolee, and in the<br />
juvenile<br />
homes operated by the Department. ¢nen we think of vocational rehabili-<br />
veterans'<br />
tation services, we must think of all of them, he stressed.<br />
the problems of these people could be reduced to a single common denom-<br />
If<br />
it would generally be found that the residents of our institutions are<br />
inator,<br />
some way or another insecure people. They have reached their present situa-<br />
in<br />
becuase they have had some faulty learning experiences, have not profited<br />
tion<br />
normal relationships, and for some reason have not been able to approach<br />
from<br />
in a mature fashion, in keeping with their age or situation in life. For<br />
life<br />
reason, these are people who do not know how to relate, or do not<br />
whatever<br />
effectively, and whose feelings of insecurity and inadequacy have kept<br />
relate<br />
from relating to society. In addition, multiple physical difficulties<br />
them<br />
contributed to their insecurity.<br />
have<br />
of the people in institutions require re___habilitation; another segment<br />
Some<br />
habilitation, DR. CONTE pointed out. This is a matter of conditioning<br />
needs<br />
for the first time to approach life and its responsibilities. These are<br />
them<br />
who are out of step, who have not been able to succeed. They need help<br />
people<br />
and support to reach a better adjustment to society.<br />
178
the schools for the mentally retarded there are about 4,000 individuals<br />
In<br />
intellectual capacity is not what it should be. They can be helped if<br />
whose<br />
difficulty can be clearly defined and they can be given proper supporting<br />
their<br />
Multiple physical defects are a part of their problem.<br />
tools.<br />
correctional institutions hold individuals who, in their lack of<br />
State<br />
Qould destroy the rights of others, and in a hostile way act out<br />
maturity<br />
resentment of others. Because of their actions, "society has decided<br />
their<br />
incarceration is the answer.<br />
that<br />
juvenile institutions within the state there are young people who have<br />
In<br />
out of school, who have carried hostility one step further to violate<br />
dropped<br />
rights of others. A pattern of failure is manifested here. Something<br />
the<br />
to be happening today that makes it more difficult for children to iden-<br />
seems<br />
with their own sexual roles. More and more children are turning to drugs<br />
tify<br />
an escape.<br />
as<br />
physical handicaps, epilepsy, disorders of the central nervous<br />
Other<br />
are among the disabilities which characterize the 12,000, DR. CONTE<br />
system,<br />
said. This is the clientele where clients for rehabilitation will be found.<br />
is it so important to worry about the work a man does and to train<br />
Why<br />
for a vocation? There are those who say, !'Don't worry about him in the<br />
him<br />
But it is never too soon to begin a vocational effort. The<br />
institutions."<br />
a man does contributesto hisown image. When an individual is helped<br />
work<br />
find a place in the world, this is meaningful to his total personality<br />
to<br />
We are trying to help people develop feelings of security. This<br />
structure.<br />
the overlying reason why vocational rehabilitation in institutions has a<br />
is<br />
approach to service. In any approach to vocational rehabilitation services<br />
new<br />
DR. CONTE suggested four areas for consideration:<br />
Evaluation ofthe candidate. This should go beyond the questions,<br />
(i)<br />
there a skill or, is there a job? The individual and his total<br />
is<br />
situation must be reviewed, The depth of the problem and<br />
life<br />
cepacity of the individual to improve his ability must be<br />
the<br />
assessed.<br />
A medical evaluation. Every medical problem must be thoroughly<br />
(2)<br />
Some minor medical problems can completely sabotage<br />
investigated.<br />
all the rehabilitation.services in the world.<br />
Social and psychological problems. These are part of the total<br />
(3)<br />
effort. It is important to know something about the<br />
counseling<br />
not only at the moment of discovery, but at the time he<br />
family,<br />
to the family. Much of his adjustment depends on his family<br />
returns<br />
their support. If it is ineffective, professional efforts go<br />
and<br />
the drain.<br />
down<br />
A specific training_ proggm.. This is a new effort for both the<br />
(4)<br />
of Institutions and the Division and is concerned with<br />
Department<br />
179
DISCUSSION:<br />
comprehensive vocational rehabilitation services to<br />
providing<br />
of institutions who are eligible for these services<br />
residents<br />
the terms of the State Plan. To meet anticipated manpower<br />
under<br />
a program has been devised to provide supervised<br />
shortages,<br />
for entry level vocational rehabilitation officers, thus<br />
training<br />
a pool of experienced personnel.<br />
creating<br />
ST. LAURENT asked how many of the 12,900 now in institutions would be<br />
MR.<br />
to receive and profit from rehabilitation services.<br />
able<br />
CONTE replied that no recent survey had been made, and that making one<br />
DR.<br />
a costly and time-consuming process which in the final figure would show<br />
was<br />
candidates for service than the program could reach. Hopefully, as the<br />
more<br />
becomes better staffed, some statistics for long-range planning will<br />
program<br />
be forthcoming.<br />
HOLDEN noted that at Western State Hospital the VRO stationed there<br />
MR.<br />
able to rehabilitate as many clients annually as a counselor in the regular<br />
was<br />
program.<br />
OLIVER and MR. NOREN confirmed that about 49 per cent of the clients<br />
MR.<br />
in an early adult corrections Program in Spokane were successfully<br />
accepted<br />
rehabilitated.<br />
to preventive programs, MRS. GRIDLEY expressed her interest in<br />
Referring<br />
rehabilitation programs being developed in schools and the success<br />
vocational<br />
in these programs. She also felt there was much to be said for programs<br />
achieved<br />
the community level which keep the child at home.<br />
at<br />
CONTE felt that most social and health programs are only scratching<br />
DR.<br />
surface where prevention is concerned.<br />
the<br />
ADAMS wondered if in some cases people might be kept out of institu-<br />
DR.<br />
for too long a time. There are some, he thought who ought to go in<br />
tions<br />
sooner than they do.<br />
the matter of community care versus institutionalization, DR. CONTE<br />
In<br />
that many communities have not developed the kind of services needed<br />
remarked<br />
these people. But the hope does exist that some day those who are mentally<br />
for<br />
mentally retarded, or who are public offenders may have services within<br />
ill,<br />
their communities that are as sophisticated as those now available in institutions.<br />
are<br />
ST. LAURENT asked about the work release Program and how candidates<br />
MR.<br />
selected.<br />
fifty men are presently in this program, DR. CONTE replied. The law<br />
About<br />
by the 1967 State Legislature) calls for the release of an individual<br />
(enacted<br />
180
a correctional institution for employment or training. An individual who<br />
from<br />
the institution under this program must return each evening to a super-<br />
leaves<br />
situation. Usually this is the county jail and for this reason many have<br />
vised<br />
the service. No set rules exist for the selection of candidates.<br />
refused<br />
is based upon a variety of factors, primari'ly upon the man's record<br />
Eligibility<br />
in the institution and the offense that put him there-. The need for<br />
while<br />
to take care of these cases is apparent, DR. CONTE agreed. Goodwill<br />
homes<br />
and the Kiwanis Club, in Spokane, Were mentioned by MRS. POWERS<br />
Industries<br />
and DR. ADAMS as providing a needed service in this area.<br />
POWERS asked about Birch Cottage. DR. CONTE described it as a well-<br />
MRS.<br />
example of a group type service for young people. Supervision in<br />
publicized<br />
all phases of the life there helps these young people to understand themselves.<br />
CARSON asked DR. CONTE whether he would like to see the vocational<br />
MR.<br />
officer and the parole officer working with the same client,<br />
rehabilitation<br />
under the same roof. And DR. PALMER wondered whether the VRO and<br />
perhaps<br />
correctional counselor might some day be the same person.<br />
the<br />
CONTE felt that people in state officesin Olympia could not'decide<br />
DR.<br />
people ought to collaborate with each other. A good idea in Olympia is not<br />
what<br />
a good idea for people in the field, he cautioned. He said he would<br />
always<br />
to sanction and encourage the above proposal, and hope that the people<br />
like<br />
in the field could try it out to see whether it would work.<br />
GRIDLEY mentioned programs where the social worker is the one who<br />
MRS.<br />
counseling and guidance and said shethought new and complex services<br />
gives<br />
were being developed to meet new needs.<br />
respect to people employed in a program DR. CONTE believes that the<br />
With<br />
barriers between disciplines are becoming blurred. He commented<br />
traditional<br />
on the assignment of people to do a job when they have the ability<br />
briefly<br />
do it, regardless of academic degrees. In dealing with the human element,<br />
to<br />
individual and how he sees himself in relation to others is important.<br />
the<br />
of tese people would not be easy. The professional social worker,<br />
Selection<br />
out of school, needs training to work with the mentally ill in hospitals.<br />
just<br />
are now changing their training programs. In the 40's and 50's,<br />
Universities<br />
recalled, training help was not available, but patients nevertheless were<br />
he<br />
to leave the mental hospitals.because some warm loving person there had<br />
able<br />
given them something they needed.-<br />
of excerpt from approved minutes of Commission<br />
(End<br />
December 6, 1968)<br />
meeting,<br />
181
coordination of the several programs was a particular<br />
The<br />
of the members of the Planning Commission. It was pointed<br />
concern<br />
that some of the interagency agreements between Vocational<br />
out<br />
and other service agencies were quite old. Atthe<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
1968 publication date of REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE,<br />
June<br />
most recent agreement of the Division of VocNtional Rehabili-<br />
the<br />
with the Department of Public Assistance was in 1954; with<br />
tation<br />
Department of Labor and Industries, 1945; with the Department<br />
the<br />
Institutions, 1966; with the Health Department, 1963; and with<br />
of<br />
Employment Security Department, 1967.<br />
the<br />
school agreements have been signed with more<br />
Cooperative<br />
a dozen different school districts. These are all of recent<br />
than<br />
date.<br />
October 18, 1968, another agreement between the State<br />
On<br />
of Institutions and Vocational Rehabilitation was signed.<br />
Department<br />
agreement calls for the rehabilitation agency to begin a pro-<br />
This<br />
of services in each major service area of the Department of<br />
gram<br />
A full-grown program is the goal of the agreement.<br />
Institutions.<br />
new counselors would need to be added. The efforts, of the two<br />
Many<br />
according to the agreement, would be directed toward build-<br />
agencies,<br />
an effective bridge forthose leaving institutions.<br />
ing<br />
agreement was signed in October. At the time of the<br />
This<br />
of this planning project, there had been no implementa-<br />
completion<br />
The federal cutback in funds during the middle of a fiscal<br />
tion.<br />
prevented the employment of the coordinator called for in the<br />
year<br />
agreement.<br />
State Employment Service<br />
1955 agreement between the Employment Security Depart-<br />
A<br />
and the Vocational Rehabilitation program, and still in effect<br />
ment<br />
1968, provided the framework for the working relationship between<br />
in<br />
two agencies.<br />
the<br />
MDTA Program<br />
Rehabilitation has been providing medical<br />
Vocational<br />
and minor medical services to referred Manpower<br />
examinations<br />
Training Act cases of the Employment Security Depart-<br />
Development<br />
It is assumed that this important service will be continued.<br />
ment.<br />
Pub l i c<br />
We l fare<br />
Public Assistance programs in the United States are<br />
The<br />
rapidly. A higher percentage of the clients of the Voca-<br />
growing<br />
Rehabilitation Division in the State of Washington are<br />
ational<br />
Assistance recipients than any other state, according to<br />
Public<br />
182
figures. It is anticipated that in the years to come Public<br />
recent<br />
clients will receive priority for vocational rehabili-<br />
Assistance<br />
services. The budget document prepared by the Division of<br />
tation<br />
Rehabilitation, outlining its plans for the biennium<br />
Vocational<br />
begins July 1969, has this to say about th 9 Department of<br />
which<br />
Assistance:<br />
Public<br />
Rehabilitationof PublicAssistance Recipients<br />
major emphasis toward vocational rehabilitation of Public<br />
A<br />
recipients must be maintained. The Work In-<br />
Assistance<br />
Program, which was authorized by the 1967 Amend-<br />
centive<br />
to the Social Security Act, will be administered in<br />
ments<br />
State of Washington by the Department of Employment<br />
the<br />
with referrals in selected categories by the<br />
Security<br />
of Public Assistance. It is now estimated that<br />
Department<br />
35 percent of the applicants to the Work In-<br />
approximately<br />
Program will be referred to the Division of Voca-<br />
centive<br />
Rehabilitation because of need for more extensive<br />
tional<br />
intensive services if they are to be removed from the<br />
and<br />
rolls and placed in productive employment. The<br />
welfare<br />
has participated in joint planning with the<br />
Division<br />
of Public Assistance and Employment. Security<br />
Departments<br />
will continue to operate in accordance with plans made<br />
and<br />
the Community Action Motivation Program in Washington.<br />
under<br />
Evaluation and Inventory Project (Public Assistance<br />
An<br />
grant has been made to the Division to evaluate<br />
Recipients)<br />
inventory the rehabilitation potential of a selected<br />
and<br />
of Public Assistance recipients. Historically, the<br />
sample<br />
of Washington has provided vocational rehabilitation<br />
State<br />
to disabled Public Assistance recipients in in-<br />
services<br />
and sizeable numbers. Notwithstanding these regu-<br />
creasing<br />
increases in the population served, the Division of<br />
lar<br />
Rehabilitation has been aware of the need to<br />
Vocational<br />
even more extensive services to disabled Public<br />
provide<br />
recipients. As a result of this concern within<br />
Assistance<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and a similar<br />
the<br />
in the Department of Public Assistance, there has,<br />
concern<br />
a number of years, been close cooperation between<br />
for<br />
two agencies in order to provide more adequate ser-<br />
these<br />
to Public Assistance recipients.<br />
vices<br />
The project has multiple goals which include the following:<br />
The project will provide the capacity to do in-depth<br />
A.<br />
of Public Assistance recipients. We expect<br />
screening<br />
by this screening we will be able to identify<br />
that<br />
potential in recipients we have not<br />
rehabilitation<br />
previously attempted to rehabilitate;<br />
183
The project will provide us with more accurate infor-<br />
B.<br />
about the number of Public Assistance recip-<br />
mation<br />
who have a potential for vocational rehabilita-<br />
ients<br />
tion;<br />
The project will provide us the opportunity to experi-<br />
C.<br />
test and demonstrate the concept of team evalua-<br />
ment,<br />
tion for vocational rehabilitation;<br />
Operationally, this project will significantly enhance<br />
D.<br />
quality and increase quantity of services provided<br />
the<br />
to Public Assistance recipients.<br />
for increased services of vocational rehabilita-<br />
.Planning<br />
in the biennium will be related to project findings<br />
tion<br />
based on continuing cooperation with the State Depart-<br />
and<br />
of Public Assistance.<br />
ment<br />
project, with a basic purpose to reduce the number of<br />
This<br />
on public assistance rolls, was initiated in the autumn of<br />
persons<br />
soon after the foregoing budget document was written. However,<br />
1968,<br />
several months, the project director resigned and the project<br />
after<br />
now dormant. It does seem as if the project were well. organized<br />
is<br />
the project director during his tenure. The procedures, including<br />
by<br />
evaluation, were carefully written. The public assistance pro-<br />
their<br />
is also discussed on page 154.<br />
gram<br />
Education<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
every student who is need of vocational rehabili-<br />
That...<br />
should be served.<br />
tation<br />
this time approximately one-tenth of the secondary<br />
At<br />
special education students eligible for vocational rehabilita-<br />
level<br />
services are being provided those services. It is hoped that<br />
tion<br />
secondary level special education students be provided services<br />
all<br />
a cooperative school agreement. The Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
under<br />
has many different school systems which have requested co-<br />
Division<br />
operative agreements.<br />
Voluntary Organizations<br />
to voluntary organizations have increased. The<br />
Services<br />
Artificial Kidney Center has a contract with the Division of<br />
Seattle<br />
Rehabilitation which involves service to a number of indi-<br />
Vocational<br />
who would probably die if they did not have .the dialysis pro-<br />
viduals<br />
gram.<br />
184
Cedar Hills Alcoholic Treatment Center has been set up<br />
The<br />
connection with the King County (Seattle) Sheriff's Department.<br />
in<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation Division is participating with this<br />
The<br />
to insure the provision of rehabilitation services as.part of<br />
center<br />
treatment center program. The center at this time has only one<br />
the<br />
counselor assigned to,work with $1coholics. The<br />
rehabilitation<br />
of alcoholics is many times that which could be served<br />
population<br />
one counselor.<br />
by<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation in the State of<br />
The<br />
has had a powerful influence on grants to state academic<br />
Washington<br />
It is hoped that these academic institutions will<br />
institutions.<br />
have a powerful influence on Vocational Rehabilitation as a<br />
soon<br />
agency. There is a marvelous potential to transform counsel-<br />
state<br />
to elevate the state agency through the utilization of counsel-<br />
ing,<br />
trained in the graduate program at the University of Washington.<br />
ors<br />
services to the severely physically handicapped can be influenced<br />
The<br />
the model treatment given at the Physical Medicine and Rehabili-<br />
by<br />
section at the University of Washington Medical School. The<br />
tation<br />
Research Institute in the School of Social Work at the<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
of Washington, is doing some pioneering work-in the utili-<br />
University<br />
of family members in rehabilitation. The Child Development<br />
zation<br />
at the University of Washington has the finest facilities any-<br />
Center<br />
to study the development of handicapped people, including at-<br />
where<br />
toward work. A complete list of the pending and approved<br />
titudes<br />
resulting in grants from the Rehabilitation Services Admin-<br />
projects<br />
follows:<br />
istration<br />
Research and Demonstration<br />
and approved projects resulting from grants by Rehabili-<br />
Pending<br />
Services Administration and extending into the biennium<br />
tation<br />
including the following:<br />
of Washington Department of Education Graduate<br />
University<br />
in rehabilitation counseling<br />
program<br />
of Washington School of Medicine Training in<br />
University<br />
therapy<br />
physical<br />
of Washington School of Medicine Clinical teach-<br />
University<br />
in occupational therapy<br />
ing<br />
of Washington Physical medicine and rehabilitation<br />
University<br />
of Washington School of Social Work Training for<br />
University<br />
workers<br />
social<br />
of Washington School of Social Work Training in<br />
University<br />
nursing<br />
rehabilitation<br />
of Washington Speech and Hearing Clinic.- Expand<br />
University<br />
to train therapists<br />
program<br />
of Washington School of Social Work Education of<br />
University<br />
workers interested in mental retardation and<br />
social<br />
handicapped<br />
socially<br />
185
of Washington Department of Psychology Investi-<br />
University<br />
influence of special modeling and identification<br />
gate<br />
on the behavior of adolescent delinquent boys<br />
opportunities<br />
of Washington Division of Child Health Determine<br />
University<br />
of rehabilitation of young male homosexuals<br />
feasibility<br />
of Washington Department of Psychology Program<br />
University<br />
graduate study dealing With psychological aspects of<br />
of<br />
and the rehabilitation process<br />
disability<br />
of Washington Department of Physical Medicine and<br />
University<br />
Comprehensive evaluation and treatment<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
of Washington Research Institute (School of Social<br />
University<br />
Work)<br />
Foundation Rehab Center for Individuals with attitudinal<br />
Delta<br />
handicaps<br />
Washington State College To prepare certified clini-<br />
Eastern<br />
at master's level to serve in public and private<br />
cians<br />
and facilities concerned with rehabilitating<br />
agencies<br />
with speech and/or hearing impairments.<br />
adults<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation Research program to<br />
Division<br />
effectiveness of rehabilitation process in appli-<br />
study<br />
to Federal offenders.<br />
cation<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation Inservice staff training<br />
Division<br />
of Puget Sound Traineeships in occupational therapy<br />
University<br />
of Puget Sound Post graduate workshop Course in<br />
University<br />
therapy<br />
occupational<br />
River Community College Prepare. certified occupational<br />
Green<br />
assistants<br />
therapy<br />
Community College Improved vocational and academic<br />
Seattle<br />
opportunities for deaf people<br />
training<br />
Hearing and Speech Center, Inc. Establish comprehen-<br />
Seattle<br />
rehabilitation program for persons with deafness or<br />
sive<br />
hearing loss<br />
severe<br />
of Institutions Division of Handicapped Children<br />
Department<br />
Provide experience and training to help high<br />
(Fircrest)<br />
and college students become aware of the need and<br />
school<br />
to workwith mentally retarded<br />
opportunity<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation To develop techniques<br />
Division<br />
provision of rehabilitation services to disabled<br />
for<br />
rehabilitmtion potential is difficult to assess and<br />
whose<br />
because of cultural and environmental factors<br />
achieve<br />
projects are reviewed and approved by the Division in<br />
These<br />
with the provisions of Section 3 and Section 4 (a)<br />
accordance<br />
of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act. In each instance<br />
(i)<br />
Division, by its approval, must indicate that the project<br />
the<br />
to provide direct service to handicapped individuals<br />
proposes<br />
will make a substantial contribution to the solution of<br />
and/or<br />
rehabilitation problems in the State of Washington.<br />
vocational<br />
direct case services to handicapped persons are provided<br />
When<br />
part of the project operation, these individuals are either<br />
as<br />
by the Division and/or become clients of the Division.<br />
referred<br />
186
Division provides direct consultation to the grantee(s) by<br />
The<br />
on advisory committees and boards of trainee selection.<br />
serving<br />
Manpower Policy<br />
the major lecture, "Manpower Rehabilitation as a Public<br />
In<br />
delivered at the 1968 annual meeting of the National Rehab-<br />
Market,"<br />
Association, Paul M. Ellwood,Jr., M.D. of Minneapolis,<br />
ilitation<br />
the following statements:<br />
made<br />
the goal of national employment programs is to assure<br />
"<br />
greatest possible opportunity for employment to the largest pos-<br />
the<br />
number of clients at the lowest sound cost. This is another<br />
sible<br />
of saying that national manpower programs are faced with the ne-<br />
way<br />
of applying the principles of cost-effectiveness, which are,<br />
cessity<br />
course, identified with the exacting, coldly analytical decision-<br />
of<br />
processes of the defense department. Will this style of de-<br />
making<br />
be accepted by the professions and public officials<br />
cision-making<br />
engaged in rehabilitation and employment services?<br />
of the unemployed, likeall other fields,<br />
"Rehabilitation<br />
assume a limited supply of resources as a constant factor to be<br />
must<br />
with as a basic condition of programming and planning. Cost-<br />
reckoned<br />
is, of course, a method of determining whether a dollar<br />
effectiveness<br />
here will go farther than a dollar spent elsewhere. Theoreti-<br />
spent<br />
our limited dollars for unemployment programs could be expected<br />
cally,<br />
produce greater benefits for more people if they were allocated in<br />
to<br />
way."<br />
this<br />
rehabilitation services in the nation are 48<br />
Vocational<br />
old and nearly 40 in our state. The training and use of the<br />
years<br />
human resources are not a new public concern; only in the<br />
nation's<br />
have federally supported manpower programs emerged as a major<br />
1960's<br />
economic and socialpol±cy. As a result, the last half dozen<br />
tool.of<br />
have been filled with feverish activity. Now is an opportune<br />
years<br />
time to take stock.<br />
policy s aimed at developing and using the capac-<br />
Manpower<br />
of human beings as actual or potential members of the labor<br />
ities<br />
Although its central operational field is the labor market,<br />
force.<br />
policy also has a bearing upon economic, education, and mill-<br />
manpower<br />
policies, not to mention programs in welfare, antipoverty, voca-<br />
tary<br />
rehabilitation, and urban development. In fact, there is a<br />
tional<br />
dimension of almost every aspect of economic, social, and<br />
manpower<br />
policy.<br />
political<br />
as poverty may be alleviated and diminished by<br />
Insofar<br />
jobs and educating, training, or upgrading the members of<br />
creating<br />
families, manpower policy is centrally implicated. It is also<br />
poor<br />
in programs to provide people on welfare incentives to seek<br />
involved<br />
and hold jobs.<br />
187
a position paper by the National Manpower Policy Task<br />
In<br />
dated January 1969, and entitled "The Nation's Manpower<br />
Force,<br />
Programs," is the following:<br />
present challenge is to develop a coherent manpower<br />
"The<br />
not just for the moment but for the 1970's and beyond. The<br />
policy,<br />
lesson is that at the local level, where people are located<br />
first<br />
must be served, available manpower services should be provided<br />
and<br />
the basis of need, not impeded by diverse eligibility require-<br />
on<br />
varying administrative practices, or competing agencies. The<br />
ments,<br />
programs must be fused into a single comprehensive manpower<br />
separate<br />
a variety of services in varying mixed depending<br />
program--providing<br />
upon national conditions and local need."<br />
federal government is providing minimum income stand-<br />
The<br />
for those unable to work because they are too old, ill, or<br />
ards<br />
with family responsibilities. But those who can work should<br />
burdened<br />
provided with remedial education, training, physical restoration,<br />
be<br />
or jobs depending upon individual needs and capabilities.<br />
has been a ten-fold increase in money for federal<br />
There<br />
programs just since 1961. In the State of Washington these<br />
manpower<br />
have aided greatly in the rehabilitation of disabled indi-<br />
programs<br />
viduals.<br />
are a humane nation and we are a nation of businessmen.<br />
We<br />
we violate the principles of humanity and business when<br />
Yet<br />
we Continue permit large numbers of Americans to languish<br />
to<br />
the shadow of a serious handicap which could be mastered.<br />
in<br />
the conscience and the purse suffer when men and women<br />
Both<br />
could be self-reliant and productive are consigned to<br />
who<br />
futility and dependengy.<br />
the National Citizens Advisory<br />
--from<br />
on Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />
Committee<br />
1968<br />
188
Coordination With Other State Planning<br />
Poverty<br />
number of studies have shown that the poor have more<br />
A<br />
and emotional disabilities and mental retardation than<br />
physical<br />
who are not poor. In addition,there is a disproportionate<br />
those<br />
of poor peoplewho have multiple handicaps. Too frequently,<br />
number<br />
poor have the least ability and know-how in seeking solutions<br />
the<br />
their problems in connection with these disabilities.<br />
for<br />
SOUL ON ICE, Eldridge Cleaver expressed some of the<br />
In<br />
of one section of the poor as follows:<br />
feeling<br />
Americans are too easily deceived by a few smiles<br />
Black<br />
friendly gestures, by the passing of a few liberal-<br />
and<br />
laws which are left on the books to rot un-<br />
sounding<br />
and by the mushy speechmaking of a President who<br />
enforced,<br />
a past master of talking out of the thousand sides of<br />
is<br />
mouth. Such poetry does not guarantee the safe future<br />
his<br />
the black people in America. The black people must<br />
of<br />
a guarantee, they must be certain,they must be sure<br />
have<br />
all doubt that the reign of terror is ended and<br />
beyond<br />
just suspended, and that the future of their people<br />
not<br />
is secure.<br />
the 1968 Amendments to the Federal Vocational Rehab-<br />
With<br />
Law, came important changes. One of these is the extension<br />
ilitation<br />
the Vocational Rehabilitation program to include: "individuals<br />
of<br />
by reason of their youth or advanced age, low educa-<br />
disadvantaged<br />
attainments, ethnic or cultural factors, prison or delin-<br />
tional<br />
records, or other conditions which constitute a barrier to<br />
quency<br />
and other members of their families when the provision<br />
employment,<br />
vocational rehabilitation services to family members is necessary<br />
of<br />
for the rehabilitation of an individual described above."<br />
State is no longer the sparsely populated, fresh-<br />
Washington<br />
refuge from the congested metropolitan areas of the United States.<br />
air<br />
1950, the state has.gained approximately one million new resi-<br />
Since<br />
almost all added in urban areas. By 1975 the population will<br />
dents,<br />
approximately four million. Urban growth brings many problems.<br />
be<br />
and miserable conditions are often found in urban core areas.<br />
Unhumane<br />
lead to a brutal breakdown of human civilization. The individ-<br />
These<br />
becomes lost in the mass. Those who hurt most are the crippled,<br />
ual<br />
the ill, and the socially disadvantaged.<br />
1966 Oscar Lewis published LA VIDA, a study ofa Puerto<br />
In<br />
family in the culture of poverty in San Juan and in New York.<br />
Rican<br />
them he wrote, "In spite of the presence of considerable pathology,<br />
About.<br />
am impressed by the strengths in this family. I am impressed by<br />
I<br />
their fortitude, vitality, resilience and ability to cope with problems<br />
189
would paralyze many middle-class individuals. It takes a great<br />
which<br />
of staying power to live in their harsh and brutalizing environ-<br />
deal<br />
They are tough people, but they have their own sense of dig-<br />
ment.<br />
and morality and they are capable of kindness, generosity and<br />
nity<br />
They share food and clothing, help each other in mis-<br />
compassion.<br />
take in the homeless and cure the ill. "Money and material<br />
fortune,<br />
although important, do not motivate their major de-<br />
possessions,<br />
Their deepest need is for love, and their life is a re-<br />
cisions.<br />
lentless search for it."<br />
last twenty years have seen a flow from rural areas<br />
The<br />
the cities and a cross-current of former city dwellers to the<br />
into<br />
This created depressed rural communities and decaying core<br />
suburbs.<br />
This dreadful cycle continues. If we build vigorous, thriv-<br />
cities.<br />
communities in our rural areas then we halt and maybe even reverse<br />
ing<br />
migration that has led to so many problems, so much misery.<br />
the<br />
THE COISSION RECONDS:<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation develop more<br />
That<br />
methods of delivering vocational rehabilitation<br />
effective<br />
to handicapped Indians. Indians should be recruited<br />
services<br />
staff members counselors, aides, clerical assistants--<br />
as<br />
work with the reservation Indians and other concentrations<br />
to<br />
Indians.<br />
of<br />
rural areas have their disadvantaged persons and<br />
The<br />
areas just as the urban centers do. The Negro and the core<br />
blighted<br />
ghetto are matched by the Indian and the reservation, and the<br />
city<br />
and the farm labor camp. It is a problem that usually is<br />
migrant<br />
less frequently noticed but equally difficult to solve.<br />
pessimism of these people is reflected in this quote<br />
The<br />
THE.AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MALCOLM X. He, o course, was assassinated<br />
from<br />
before Grove Press published his book in 1964.<br />
knew that the black man had all the strikes against<br />
They<br />
that the white man kept the black man down, under<br />
him,<br />
his heel, unable-to get anywhere, really.<br />
are certain objectives and principles common to all<br />
There<br />
in the rehabilitation of public assistance recipients. Among<br />
states<br />
them are the following:<br />
goal in all states will be to increase substantially<br />
The<br />
number of public assistance applicants and recipients<br />
the<br />
rehabilitation and social services so that they<br />
provided<br />
be gainfully employed.<br />
can<br />
190
the vocational rehabilitation agency and the welfare<br />
Both<br />
will need to commit staff and funds to carry out<br />
agency<br />
the integrated program plan.<br />
resources of other welfare programa, of manpower<br />
The<br />
and of various other programs such as model<br />
programs,<br />
and neighborhood service centers should be taken<br />
cities<br />
account and utilized in the cooperative program.<br />
into<br />
approaches, including such measures as re-<br />
Innovative<br />
of staff, joint housing of staff, simplified<br />
development<br />
and case and administrative forms used in<br />
procedures<br />
by both agencies, the team approach in case plan-<br />
common<br />
and management, a cooperatively developed plan for<br />
ning<br />
and rehabilitation services for each client served,<br />
social<br />
involvement, the development of new resources<br />
community<br />
facilities, and experimentation in the organization<br />
and<br />
and delivery of services will be essential.<br />
guidelines for the development of an integrated<br />
These<br />
program plan for the vocational rehabilitation of public<br />
action<br />
applicants and recipients were stated in Bulletin 13,<br />
assistance<br />
ii, of REHABILITATION INTERAGENCY FOCUS.<br />
Volume<br />
Kenneth Barnes, in his 1968 lecture, "Planning for<br />
R.<br />
Service Needs in Rehabilitation Facilities" made this<br />
Psychological<br />
"The rhetoric of the psychologist abounds in verbal manipula-<br />
point,<br />
and verbal interpretations. Admitting and accepting the success<br />
tion<br />
the psychological model for upper and middle class America, it is<br />
of<br />
that we cannot solve the awesome problems of many disabled<br />
submitted<br />
most disadvantaged unless we apply the more non-verbal work model<br />
and<br />
environmental manipulation model, not reluctantly, but enthusias-<br />
or<br />
tically, throughout the rehabilitation processes offered in facilities."<br />
also stated in this lecture to psychologists, "A perva-<br />
He<br />
problem that perplexed rehabilitation personnel in the last score<br />
sive<br />
years was the matter of eligibility for service. Once upon a time,<br />
of<br />
same rehabilitation counselor who would have declared eligible<br />
the<br />
service a John Kennedy for his 'bad back, also most likely would<br />
for<br />
rejected an Oswald for 'no diagnostically identifiable disability. have TM<br />
unimaginative administrative and perhaps legal, interpretations<br />
These<br />
resolved by the 1965 and 1967 Vocational Rehabilitation Act<br />
were<br />
which clarified the concept of disability to emphasize the<br />
amendments<br />
disorders and the disadvantaged."<br />
behavioral<br />
services to the urban poor might best be<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
in a new kind of center. On December.7, 1968, the Commis-<br />
provided<br />
endorsed the concept of an Employment Evaluation and Service<br />
sion<br />
operated by Vocational Rehabilitation in Washington State.<br />
Center<br />
It is described in some detail in this book beginning on page 138.<br />
191
Mental Health Planning<br />
provided by the State of Washington's Department<br />
Statistics<br />
Institutions indicate that at this time 3,400 individuals of work-<br />
of<br />
age are discharged annually from the states three mental hospitals.<br />
ing<br />
all of these people are vocationally handicapped at the time<br />
Almost<br />
their furlough or discharge. Many of them would go into the world<br />
of<br />
work if this option were open to them. They often have problems<br />
of<br />
are manifested on the job. Vocational rehabilitation services<br />
that<br />
indicated for these people.<br />
are<br />
vocational rehabilitation services are 8ften not<br />
However,<br />
to these people. The indications are that in the fiscal<br />
available<br />
1968, only 181 of these people were offered vocational rehab-<br />
year<br />
services at the time of discharge. This means that more<br />
ilitation<br />
3,200 of these recovered mentally ill people returning to the<br />
than<br />
were not offered any services.<br />
community<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
should be an expansion of serviees to the hospitalized<br />
There<br />
ill so that by 1975 all patients below the age of<br />
mentally<br />
would be referred to vocational rehabilitation routinely,<br />
60<br />
later screening to exclude those not feasible for<br />
with<br />
vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
entire concept of mental illness and mental retardation<br />
The<br />
being scrutinized. A number of people in the health professions<br />
is<br />
critical of the present situation. We have titles in our books<br />
are<br />
as: THE DISCONTENT EXPLOSION IN MENTAL HEALTH, THE REFORM OF<br />
such<br />
HOSPITALS, and THE CRIME OF COMMITMENT. Seymour Halleck, a<br />
MENTAL<br />
who is Chief of Psychiatric Services for the Wisconsin<br />
physician<br />
of Corrections, wrote.in the March 1969 issue of PSYCHOLOGY<br />
Division<br />
about "The Reform of Mental Hospitals." The article said in<br />
TODAY,<br />
part:<br />
system of committing mental patients to hospitals for<br />
Our<br />
against their will has many drawbacks. But I<br />
treatment<br />
not thereforeTthink the system should be abolished.<br />
do<br />
I think we should concentrate on radical reforms.<br />
Rather<br />
I am convinced these reforms are necessary. In-<br />
And<br />
commitments are unjustifiably frequent today<br />
voluntary<br />
of two false beliefs. Too many believe that the<br />
because<br />
disturbed are more dangerous than normal per-<br />
emotionally<br />
despite repeated statistical evidence to the con-<br />
sons,<br />
Thousands of patients in mental hospitals probably<br />
trary.<br />
could be released without harm to themselves or others.<br />
common misconception is that mental illness re-<br />
Another<br />
long-termhospitalization. This false belief<br />
quires<br />
allows us to tolerate many hospitals that provide primarily<br />
192
care. Thousands in our mental hospitals would<br />
custodial<br />
have to be there if they could receive adequate treat-<br />
not<br />
ment.<br />
society is faced with decision involving control<br />
Whenever<br />
the. insane offender, the mentally incompetent, the drug<br />
of<br />
the sex offender or the mentally ill, it must base<br />
addict,<br />
decision upon social principles or values. Unfortu-<br />
its<br />
our society has been tentative and inconsistent<br />
nately,<br />
defining its values. Punishment is often valued as<br />
in<br />
as rehabilitation. Protecting the status quo of our<br />
muck<br />
mental-hospital system often comes'before protec-<br />
present<br />
emotionally disturbed citizen. Reform would<br />
tingthe<br />
faster if we could consistently adhere to realistic<br />
come<br />
We must developlaws and practices that protect<br />
values.<br />
but at the same time. we must abandon our impulse<br />
society,<br />
punish or neglect the emotionally disturbed. We must<br />
to<br />
for treatment that will return them to society in<br />
search<br />
the shortest possible time.<br />
even more radical recommendation has come from Thomas<br />
An<br />
a professor of Psychiatry at the State University of New<br />
Szasz,<br />
Upstate Medical Center in Syracuse. Dr. Szasz, also writing<br />
York,<br />
PSYCHOLOGY TODAY, stated:<br />
in<br />
and laymen .alike generally believe persons<br />
Physicians<br />
involuntarily confined in mental hospitals because<br />
are<br />
are mentally ill, but don't know they are sick and<br />
they<br />
medical treatment. This view, to put it charitably,<br />
need<br />
nonsense. In my opinion, mental illness is a myth.<br />
is<br />
we label "mentally ill" are not sick, and invol-<br />
People<br />
mental hospitalization is not treatment. It is<br />
untary<br />
punishment.<br />
kinds of therapy once considered so effective in mental<br />
The<br />
are now questioned. It is believed by many professionals<br />
hospitals<br />
a long £erm of person,to-person psychotherapy is hurtful rather<br />
that<br />
helpful to the patient.<br />
than<br />
Hersch in AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, for July 1968,<br />
Charles<br />
DiscoNtent Explosion in Mental Health" wrote as follows:<br />
"The<br />
of the most important sources of discontent was in<br />
One<br />
failure of the mental health movement to deal effect-<br />
the<br />
with many of the problems about which society was<br />
ively<br />
concerned. This is not meant to single out the<br />
most<br />
health professions for special criticism. Their<br />
mental<br />
including those of omission, were shared by the<br />
failures,<br />
professions and organizations as well. But in the<br />
other<br />
of psychiatry, we promised ourselves and society too<br />
age<br />
and we are living now in the aftermath of that<br />
much,<br />
disappointment.<br />
193
the child guidance field, the sociopathic deviations<br />
In<br />
particularly resistant to professional attention.<br />
were<br />
there had been a long history of clinical and<br />
Although<br />
involvement with the problems of delinquency,<br />
research<br />
approaches remained ineffective, and even<br />
traditional<br />
projects, such as the Cambridge-Somerville<br />
large-scale<br />
(Powers & Witmer, 1951), could not produce satis-<br />
Study<br />
results. Efforts in.delinquency prevention and<br />
factory<br />
the treatment of the individual delinquent met with<br />
in<br />
frustration.<br />
repeated<br />
families represented another refractory<br />
Multiproblem<br />
Indeed, their very imperviousness to inter-<br />
group.<br />
came to be considered in some quarters as a<br />
vention<br />
criterion. Many psychiatric disorders were<br />
defining<br />
among their impairments, and the children tended<br />
included<br />
be sufficiently disabled, both emotionally and educa-<br />
to<br />
so as to perpetuate their multiproblem status<br />
tionally,<br />
the next generation. Typically these families were a<br />
in<br />
to the community as well as to themselves. How-<br />
burden<br />
persistent attempts to work with them in. an ortho-<br />
ever,<br />
dox framework found little success.<br />
a need for the treatment of the mentally ill is<br />
Probably<br />
focus on a public health model of operation where prevention is<br />
to<br />
important than therapy. Employment at suitable work is more<br />
more<br />
than most pills, or other traditional therapies. Brief<br />
important<br />
is better than long-term hospitalization. The<br />
hospitalization<br />
worker would be better off to record an employment history<br />
social<br />
than to record the pathology leading to the hospitalization.<br />
treatment method is best exemplified in the United<br />
This<br />
by the Fort Logan StateHospital in the suburbs of Denver,<br />
States<br />
Vocational rehabilitation plays one of the most important<br />
Colorado.<br />
in that hospital.<br />
roles<br />
the State of Washington has three state<br />
Fortunately,<br />
that are relativelY well financed, properly staffed, and<br />
hospitals<br />
operated, and an active research program exists. It would<br />
humanely<br />
particularly easy to work with the superintendents of the three<br />
be<br />
hospitals Eastern Washington State Hospital, Western Wash-<br />
state<br />
State Hospital, and Northern Washington State Hospital--- to<br />
ington<br />
rehabilitation services. Vocational rehabilitation services<br />
provide<br />
be provided in this setting through "third party" funds without<br />
can<br />
state or local expenditures. Money appropriated by the<br />
additional<br />
of Washington's Departmentof Institutions is matched by<br />
state<br />
funds at a ratio of five federal dollars for each state<br />
federal<br />
No additional state funds are required. It is assumed that<br />
dollar.<br />
1975 there will be an enormous expansion of vocational rehabili-<br />
by<br />
services i the three state hospitals. It is also assumed<br />
tation<br />
that different delivery systems of services to the mentally ill will<br />
194
utilized increasingly. Patients will be served in mental hygiene<br />
be<br />
so that the need for in-hospital services will be drastically<br />
clinics<br />
reduced.<br />
state funds are derived from appropriations.made specifically<br />
Most<br />
vocational rehabilitation. Thereare, however, other important<br />
for<br />
Public funds may be made available by transfer between<br />
sources.<br />
agencies or by accounting for indirect costs to the state<br />
state<br />
such as those for space, retirement, etc. A term often used<br />
program<br />
"Third-Party Funds," which means that the state share of the cost<br />
is<br />
serving handicapped individuals under the state plan is borne in<br />
of<br />
by a state or local public agency other than the designated<br />
part<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation agency. A "third-party" joins the<br />
State<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation agency and the Federal Government<br />
State<br />
the funding arrangement. The "third-party" agency actually obli-<br />
in<br />
and disburses the funds, but it does this under the supervision<br />
gates<br />
control of the State Vocational Rehabilitation agency. Third-<br />
and<br />
funding has become increasingly popular since it increases the<br />
party<br />
available for vocational rehabilitation and provides more flex-<br />
funds<br />
financing and fiscal administration. Of far greater importance<br />
ible<br />
the fact that such cooperative undertakings open up new program<br />
is<br />
for reaching disabled people, introduce new services, and<br />
avenues<br />
a continuum of services among programs administered by<br />
provide<br />
state agencies.<br />
separate<br />
Rehabilitation servicesin Washington State con-<br />
Vocational<br />
to be managed by the Coordinating Council for Occupational Edu-<br />
tinue<br />
It may have "third party" funds increased. There is always<br />
cation.<br />
question about what proportion of the rehabilitation dollar should<br />
a<br />
be tied up in "third party" funds<br />
source of state matching funds is expected to<br />
Another<br />
substantial in the next few years. This is local public<br />
become<br />
private money made available.to the state vocational rehabili-<br />
or<br />
agency by a political subdivision of a state to augment<br />
tation<br />
rehabilitation services in that area. Using this pro-<br />
vocational<br />
made possible by the 1965 amendments, 38 states have developed<br />
cedure,<br />
sorts of joint programs with public and private agencies as well<br />
all<br />
increased resources and services for the vocational rehabilitation<br />
as<br />
handicapped people. It is an excellent mechanism for use in<br />
of<br />
projects" and for other target groups such as the rural poor,<br />
"city<br />
juvenile delinquents, public assistance recipients, etc.<br />
alcoholics,<br />
may also be used for establishing facilities and workshops.<br />
It<br />
195
Mental Retardation Planning<br />
1964 the U. S. Public Health Service provided the State<br />
In<br />
Washington with a grant for $30,000 for a study of mental health.<br />
of<br />
grant was provided through the leadership of the Washington State<br />
This<br />
of Institutions. In October 1963 the then Governor Albert<br />
Department<br />
appointed twelve members to the Mental Health Planning<br />
Rosellini<br />
In February 1964, with the knowledge that Washington State<br />
Committee.<br />
have available planning money for mental retardation, the Committee<br />
would<br />
expanded to include three representatives who had a special interest<br />
was<br />
services for the mentally retarded. At that time the Committee was<br />
in<br />
the Governors Committee on Mental Health and Mental Retarda-<br />
renamed<br />
The planning effort was concluded at the end of 1965. The com-<br />
tion.<br />
report of findings was distributed during 1966, as a book<br />
prehensive<br />
EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN SUMMARY OF WASHINGTON'S COMPREHENSIVE<br />
entitled<br />
TO HELP THE MENTALLY RETARDED. The chairman of this Committee<br />
PLAN<br />
was Charles R. Strother, Ph.D., of the University of Washington.<br />
State of Washington has profited from the contributions<br />
The<br />
two of its citizens who are world famous for their work with<br />
from<br />
retardation. One of them is Dr. Strother and the other is the<br />
.mental<br />
Dr. Edgar A. Doll of Bellingham. In addition.there is in Seattle<br />
late<br />
part of the University of Washington a Child Development Center<br />
as<br />
does superlative work in the field of retardation and the prepara-<br />
which<br />
of individuals for careers in the field of Psychology, education,<br />
tion<br />
genetics, social work, and vocational rehabilitation. This<br />
pediatrics,<br />
institution has earned its great reputation.<br />
Commission, too, has benefited from the services of<br />
The<br />
Strother, Dr. Alice, Hayden, Dr. Norris Haring, and others of the<br />
Dr.<br />
of the Child Development Center. Many of the techniques devel-<br />
staff<br />
by Dr. Strother and his Committee were utilized by our task<br />
oped<br />
Relevant parts of EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN were provided the task<br />
forces.<br />
of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation to aid<br />
forces<br />
them in their deliberations.<br />
is interesting to look at the recommendations made in<br />
It<br />
by the Mental Health and Mental Retardation Planning Committee<br />
1965<br />
order to see how these recommendations have fared in the inter-<br />
in<br />
years. One of theirrecommendations is quoted below:<br />
vening<br />
supervised employment programs and sheltered workshops<br />
That<br />
the employment and training of the mentally retarded<br />
for<br />
be extended and expanded.<br />
This certainly is being done. Two other recommendations follow:<br />
a study be made of the organizational structure and<br />
That<br />
of operation of workshops based on the experi-<br />
standards<br />
ences of such operations within the state.<br />
196
guidelines for operations be developed and made avail-<br />
That<br />
to existing workshops and for all other groups of<br />
able<br />
within the various communities of the state<br />
individuals<br />
have an identified interest in the initiation of work<br />
who<br />
opportunity programs for the mentally retarded.<br />
were achieved in 1968 following major effort by thel staff of<br />
These<br />
Rehabilitation. Four professional people on the staff of<br />
Vocational<br />
Rehabilitation in the State of Washington are concerned<br />
Vocational<br />
with the workshop program. They made a major study of<br />
principally<br />
program in 1968 and developed guidelines for action. These guide-<br />
this<br />
and a workshop manual were approved by the Coordinating Council<br />
lines<br />
Occupational Education in 1968. There is every reason to believe<br />
for<br />
the professional consultation services provided by Vocational<br />
that<br />
to sheltered supervised work opportunity programs are<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
to those of any. other state.<br />
equal<br />
Another recommendation stated:<br />
a policy on employment be developed within state<br />
That<br />
which will allow-for and expedite the selective<br />
government<br />
of the mentally retarded in state jobs on a<br />
placement<br />
plan as that initiated by Federal Civil Service.<br />
similar<br />
recommendation has not been followed at this time. Legislation<br />
This<br />
needed to alter the State Civil Service System. It is likely that<br />
is<br />
such legislation will be introduced this year or the next.<br />
Two other recommendations are quoted in full:<br />
evaluation, social, and prevocational training begin<br />
That<br />
the school years with transition machinery developed so<br />
in<br />
before the retarded child "graduates" from school<br />
that<br />
education), the community is aware of his poten-<br />
(special<br />
and limitations and is actually preparing to help<br />
tial<br />
move along to the next steps in this transitional<br />
him<br />
period.<br />
the cooperative program between the Tacoma School<br />
That<br />
and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
District<br />
be extended to school districts throughout the<br />
should<br />
of Washington, and that provisions in budgets be<br />
State<br />
to take advantage of available federal funds to<br />
made<br />
cooperative programs.<br />
establish<br />
cooperative school program is described earlier in this<br />
The<br />
in a statement prepared by Donald Hamilton of the Division<br />
chapter<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation. This rapidly expanding program still<br />
of<br />
only about one-tenth of the students in special education<br />
encompasses<br />
in the secondary level of the public schools. Greater expan-<br />
programs<br />
is likely in the future even as special, education programs<br />
sion<br />
197
are being expanded throughout the state, The need remains<br />
themselves<br />
T1e services that are heing provided for the favored school<br />
great,<br />
have been widely acclaimed and the program is recognized<br />
districts<br />
a good one. Each student enrolled in a special education class is<br />
as<br />
Most of them are young people who, with proper training,<br />
handicapped.<br />
be made employable. The benefits of services-to these handicapped<br />
can<br />
are readily apparent. They face a life of dependency or<br />
youngsters<br />
face a life of self-sufficiency, self-support and productivity.<br />
they<br />
Another recommendation from EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN is quoted:<br />
field staff of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
to be increased to provide necessary services to the<br />
needs<br />
mentally retarded.<br />
is also being done at the present time. Approximately one-third<br />
This<br />
the counselors of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation were<br />
of<br />
employed in 1968. As the state budget for Vocational Rehabili-<br />
newly<br />
is to be increased by approximately 84 percent in the next<br />
tation<br />
it is likely that there will be continued major increases<br />
biennium<br />
the field staff. Presumably,.the staff will be able to work with<br />
in<br />
handicapped and disadvantaged individuals. It is likely there<br />
more<br />
that the number of mental retardated being provided services<br />
fore<br />
will increase at the same rate.<br />
October 1968 the Washington Association for Retarded<br />
In<br />
made a number of recommendations to the 1969 Legislature,<br />
Children<br />
officials and departments of government, and to citizens of the<br />
to<br />
of Washington. Some of these recommendations were identical<br />
State<br />
those in the 1965 report, EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN, quoted above. A<br />
to<br />
of new ones, however, reflect the improvement in services to<br />
number<br />
mentally retarded which has occurred at both the state and local<br />
the<br />
in the last four years. For example, their recommendation No. ii<br />
level<br />
county mental retardation boards. Such boards did not even<br />
mentions<br />
the time of the writing of EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN. This is an<br />
existat<br />
Therecommendation below appeared in the WARC Newsletter,<br />
improvement.<br />
FOR RETARDED CHILDREN, for October 1968:<br />
HOPE<br />
emphasis should be given to establishing closer<br />
More<br />
on rehabilitation services with County MR<br />
relationship<br />
i.e., acquainting the public concerning the<br />
Boards,<br />
of the retarded for employment in busi-<br />
qualifications<br />
industry, extended services, sheltered workshops,<br />
ness,<br />
etc.<br />
improvement is that involved with the services of<br />
Another<br />
Department of Institutions. This Department has both community-<br />
the<br />
programs and residential treatment facilities for the mentally<br />
based<br />
The programs have been funded at far higher levels than<br />
retarded.<br />
and the over-all programs are obviously superior to the ones<br />
before<br />
recently as four years ago. The 1969 Legislature is considering<br />
as<br />
198
ecommendations of the Central Budget Agency that the budget for<br />
the<br />
state schools for the retarded and the Epton Funds for county<br />
the<br />
mental retardation services be substantially increased.<br />
recommendation made by the WARC last fall, but not yet<br />
One<br />
is as follows:<br />
implemented<br />
departments and agencies,of local and state government<br />
That<br />
encouraged to adopt policies which will allow for and<br />
be<br />
the selective placement of the mentally retarded<br />
expedite<br />
jobs on a plan similar to that initiated and so success<br />
in<br />
fully carried out by Federal Civil Service.<br />
1968 Dr. Newton Buker, a specialist in special education<br />
In<br />
the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State<br />
in<br />
Washington prepared a survey. Partsof it are relevant to voca-<br />
of<br />
rehabilitation services for the handicapped. Sections of this<br />
tional<br />
report are reproduced as follows:<br />
PREFACE<br />
education of handicapped children does not start at age<br />
The<br />
and stop at the completion of the eighth grade. The<br />
six<br />
schools have accepted a major responsibility for<br />
public<br />
these young people of high school age with experi-<br />
providing<br />
mnd training which will prepare them to be capable,<br />
ences<br />
citizens.<br />
self-supporting<br />
bulletin investigates the present status of secondary<br />
This<br />
education--particularly as it exists for the student<br />
special<br />
who is academically limited-in the State of Washington.<br />
Bruno<br />
Louis<br />
Superintendent<br />
State<br />
of Public Instruction<br />
the fall, 1967, meeting of the Washington Association of<br />
At<br />
of Special Education, a committee of members<br />
Administrators<br />
appointed to establish guidelines for secondary special<br />
was<br />
programs. This committee agreed that one of the<br />
education<br />
tasks would be to determine present and proposed dis-<br />
first<br />
programs and needs. As a result, in January, 1968.<br />
trict<br />
survey of Washington's public schools was undertaken by<br />
a<br />
State Office of Public Instruction. All Ii0 districts<br />
the<br />
currently operate programs which for children<br />
handicapped<br />
returned the survey questionnaire, State<br />
completedand<br />
institutions were not included in this report.<br />
199
Junior Hish<br />
I. PRESENT STATUS<br />
summary of the returns is presented i Table I. As of<br />
A<br />
1968, 81% of the 85 districts with junior high<br />
January,<br />
(or schools with equivalent age-groupings) in<br />
schools<br />
were serving-areas for reimbursed special educa-<br />
Washington<br />
programs. Of the 129,878 junior high school students<br />
tion<br />
3,540 (2.7%) were reported as handicapped.<br />
reported,<br />
Hish<br />
Senior<br />
the 249 high school districts in the state in January,<br />
Of<br />
61 (or 24%) were serving districts for state reim-<br />
1968,<br />
special education programs. In these districts,<br />
bursed<br />
(1.7%) of the 131,728 high school students were<br />
2,275<br />
as handicapped.<br />
listed<br />
Programs<br />
purposes of analyzing program offerings, the schools<br />
For<br />
the present study were asked to report the approximate<br />
in<br />
number of students who were scheduled into various subjects.<br />
Work-Study Pr_0$r ams<br />
programs are those in which students are given<br />
Work-study<br />
job experiences during school hours. A common<br />
supervised<br />
which has evolved is for tenth grade handicapped<br />
pattern<br />
to be given about two hours of around school work<br />
students<br />
janitorial, library service, teacher assistant,<br />
(kitchen,<br />
garage, etc.), with the majority of his day spent in<br />
bus<br />
home room or contact classes. Eleventh graders may<br />
special<br />
in classes (special home room or contact) for half of<br />
be<br />
day, and then in varied, sample, community work experi-<br />
the<br />
supervised by special teachers. Senior students may<br />
ences<br />
one or two long-term community work experiences which<br />
have<br />
lead to full-time work placement following graduation.<br />
may<br />
on the subject notes that there are, of course,<br />
Literature<br />
variations of this procedure.<br />
many<br />
opportunities were provided to 37%. of the students<br />
Workstudy<br />
41 of the 61 districts who reported high. school special<br />
in<br />
education progr&ms,<br />
200
DVR Three-Party Agre_ements<br />
agreements are a means for cooperative action<br />
Three-party<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the<br />
between<br />
of Public Instruction to assist local school dis-<br />
Office<br />
in providing qualified handicapped high school<br />
tricts<br />
with rehabilitation services, including counseling,<br />
students<br />
and/or psychological attention, job experience and<br />
physical<br />
job placement, and extended vocational follow-up.<br />
this time, seven school districts in Washington are<br />
At<br />
with three-party agreements: five "large" (Tacoma,<br />
involved<br />
Vancouver, Edmonds, and Federal Way) and two<br />
Spokane,<br />
(Auburn and Yakima).<br />
"medium":<br />
548 students now receive DVR services in the seven<br />
Some<br />
who participate.<br />
districts<br />
of the main thrusts of these DVR services is in pro-<br />
One<br />
supervised work-experience opportunities and work<br />
viding<br />
for handicapped students. Fifty-twopercent<br />
placement<br />
all handicapped students now involved in a type of<br />
of<br />
are clients of DVR: seventy-two percent in<br />
work-study<br />
large districts and seventeen percent in the medium<br />
the<br />
At this time, none of the twenty-three "small"<br />
districts.<br />
who reported high school handicapped children is<br />
districts<br />
involved in DVR three-party services.<br />
Reporting Needs for More Understanding of,<br />
Schools<br />
Involvement with, Local Agencies<br />
and<br />
Asencies. Schools<br />
21<br />
Unions<br />
19<br />
VocationalRehabilitation<br />
12<br />
Labor/Industries<br />
Security 11<br />
Employment<br />
. 9<br />
Other<br />
8<br />
Welfare<br />
Health Office 7<br />
(End of excerpts from Dr. Buker's srvey report)<br />
Kemp describes formal education as viewed by the<br />
Barbara<br />
handicapped student in a 1966 work, THE YOUTH WE<br />
socioeconomically<br />
HAVEN'T SERVED A CHALLENGE TO VOCATIONAL EDUCATION, in these words:<br />
201
the way In of summary, then, how do the students view<br />
a<br />
and education? It is important to consider and<br />
school<br />
their attitudes before attempting to change<br />
understand<br />
Their educational experience, as they see and<br />
them.<br />
interpret it, is as follows:<br />
The school day is long and tedious.<br />
education they are receiving seems to lack<br />
The<br />
to their future life and needs.<br />
relevance<br />
school system often fails to recognize and<br />
The<br />
their culturally different backgrounds.<br />
respect<br />
teachers lack an understanding of their special<br />
Some<br />
and problems, or ignore them.<br />
needs<br />
or no special instruction and attention are<br />
Little<br />
which might help them fit into the regular<br />
provided<br />
school programs.<br />
much school time, in their view, is spent on<br />
Too<br />
staff members are occasionally involved<br />
discipline;<br />
physical conflict with the students. Such behavior<br />
in<br />
the part of adults is already too frequent a part<br />
on<br />
of these youngsters lives.<br />
think they are not given the type of counseling,<br />
They<br />
or other support they need to enter the<br />
encouragement,<br />
of work, and sothey leave school unprepared for<br />
world<br />
job. When they encounter discrimination or failure<br />
a<br />
job seeking because of their age, race, or poor<br />
in<br />
background, they do not believe that a<br />
educational<br />
return to school will improve their situation.<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation services can help these students.<br />
Th__e Regional Medical ,,Program<br />
Washington-Alaska Regional Medical Program is associated<br />
The<br />
the University of Washington in Seattle. The Director is Donal<br />
with<br />
Sparkman, M.D., a member of the Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
Ro<br />
and previously the medical director of the Division of<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Rehabilitation. Dr. Sparkman also serves on the Program<br />
Vocational<br />
Group for Comprehensive Health Services. This regional<br />
Management<br />
program has staff members and volunteers who are concerned with<br />
medical<br />
topics. One concerns the need for stroke rehabilitation beds.<br />
specific<br />
report was prepared by Justus F. Lehmann, M.D., Director of the<br />
A<br />
Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University of Washing-<br />
Physical<br />
ton Medical School, Seattle. This report dated July 30, 1968, follows:<br />
202
SEATTLE AREA STROKE PATIENT BED NEED<br />
order to assist the Regional Medical Program Stroke Sub-<br />
In<br />
in the planning of rehabilitation services and facilities<br />
committee<br />
stroke patients throughout the region, the following data have<br />
for<br />
compiled.<br />
been<br />
Prevalence of Stroke<br />
Seattle Area Chronic Care Patients (60% Survival)<br />
Minimum MaXimum BedsRequired<br />
Population 951 1584 48-80<br />
Current<br />
Population<br />
Projected<br />
1972 1081 1802 55-91<br />
breakdown by age group of persons who have been disabled by stroke<br />
A<br />
as follows:<br />
is<br />
Morbidity of Stroke<br />
Age Group Rate per i000 Stroke Patients<br />
.4<br />
45<br />
7.4<br />
45-65<br />
65+ 36.4<br />
activity limitations will exist for all ages. The per cent<br />
Some<br />
patients reporting CVA as a chronic condition and having that cQn-<br />
of<br />
dition cause activity limitations is as follows:<br />
Estimated Need for Beds<br />
67.1%<br />
45<br />
65.2%<br />
45-65<br />
Percent with Activity Limitation<br />
65+ 70.4%<br />
assess the need for stroke beds, one must take into consideration<br />
To<br />
total number of rehabilitation beds available, since these beds would<br />
the<br />
the stroke patients as well as the general population of the dis-<br />
serve<br />
It must also be recognized that only a portion of the stroke<br />
abled.<br />
will need inpatient rehabilitationand in turn the services<br />
patients<br />
in these facilities to an individual patient would rarely<br />
rendered<br />
beyond four weeks. (The average stay ofa selected group of<br />
extend<br />
patients with severe involvement was approximately 30 days.)<br />
stroke<br />
203
appears that the maximal allotment of one rehabilitation bed<br />
It<br />
2000 population under the Hill-Burton Hospital Construction program<br />
per<br />
too high if applied to rehabilitation beds in facilities which provide<br />
is<br />
rehabilitation. This is taken from a report prepared by<br />
comprehensive<br />
F. J. Kottke, M.D., Director of the Rehabilitation Research and<br />
Dr.<br />
Center at the University of Minnesota Medical. School, in a<br />
Training<br />
prepared for the Cleveland Health Goals Project. A realistic<br />
report<br />
of the number of rehabilitation beds needed in facilities<br />
estimate<br />
provide intensive and comprehensive rehabilitation services<br />
which<br />
be approximately one rehabilitation bed per 5000 population to<br />
would<br />
meet the demand for this type of care.<br />
this formula the present and projected need for rehabilitation<br />
Using<br />
for the Seattle area would be:<br />
beds<br />
Population Beds Needed<br />
1,056,000 211<br />
1968<br />
1,201,300 (Projective) 240<br />
1972<br />
following table gives the present and projected rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
for the Seattle area:<br />
beds<br />
of Beds<br />
Number<br />
1968<br />
Hoital<br />
25 31<br />
University<br />
20 34.<br />
Harborview<br />
Orthopedic 0 20<br />
Childrens'<br />
Administration 12 12<br />
Veterans<br />
Health Service 12 20<br />
Public<br />
12 up to57<br />
Providence<br />
Northwest<br />
Swedish<br />
TOTAL 81 174<br />
Number of Beds<br />
Projected<br />
1972<br />
University of Washington Hospital, Department of Physical<br />
Source:<br />
andRehabilitation Expansion Plan Records.<br />
Medicine<br />
Distribution of Facilities<br />
a study done by Basil J. F. Mott for the.publication Financing<br />
In<br />
OperatingRehabilitationCentersandFacilities, the patient load<br />
and<br />
related to the distance in miles that the patient resides from the<br />
is<br />
center. This obviously has major implications with<br />
rehabilitation<br />
to the planning of such facilities. The following table illus-<br />
regard<br />
this point.<br />
trates<br />
204
Distribution of Patients by<br />
Percent<br />
of Patients' Permanent Residences<br />
Distance<br />
From Center as of the Study Period<br />
All<br />
patients Cen- Inpatient Outpatient<br />
Miles<br />
from ters centers centers.<br />
residences<br />
center<br />
Per- Per- Range<br />
cent cent among cen-<br />
Percent<br />
Range<br />
cen-<br />
among<br />
(per- ters (per-<br />
ters<br />
.. ...cent). cent)<br />
...<br />
Total iO0• i00 i00<br />
15 miles<br />
Under<br />
to 24<br />
15<br />
to 49<br />
25<br />
to 99<br />
50<br />
to 250<br />
i00<br />
250<br />
Over<br />
68<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
9<br />
9<br />
38<br />
4<br />
7<br />
22<br />
21<br />
14-83<br />
10-19<br />
12-20<br />
2-23<br />
0-39<br />
0-41<br />
88<br />
6<br />
3<br />
i<br />
i<br />
i<br />
58-96<br />
•2-22<br />
1-8<br />
0-4<br />
6 0-<br />
2 0-<br />
United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare:<br />
Source:<br />
Planning of Facilities for Rehabilitation Services,<br />
Areawide<br />
Washington, D. C.., April, 1963.<br />
purposes, the Washington State Department of Health<br />
.Forplanning<br />
a service area for rehabilitation facility as being 40 miles or<br />
considers<br />
one hour's driving time.<br />
(End of statement prepared by Justus F. Lehmann, M.D.)<br />
205
Comprehensive Health Planning<br />
Federal Public Health Service Act was amended in 1966.<br />
The<br />
amendments are known as Public Law 89-749. One section provides<br />
These<br />
the extension and improvement of Comprehensive Health Planning<br />
for<br />
Public Health Services, to provide for a more'effective use of<br />
and<br />
funds for such planning and services, and for other purposes.<br />
available<br />
provides for the establishment of a State Health Planning Council<br />
It<br />
includes representatives of stateand local agencies and non-<br />
which<br />
organizations and a majority of consumer representation.<br />
governmental<br />
members of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Staff<br />
been involved with the comprehensive health planning from the time<br />
have<br />
Daniel J. Evans designated the Planning and Community Affairs<br />
Governor<br />
to accept federal funds for this project. The chairman and the<br />
Agency<br />
director of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilita-<br />
project<br />
have been from the beginning members of the Program Management<br />
tion<br />
of Comprehensive Health Planning. The vice-chairman of the<br />
Group<br />
Commission has served as a member of the State Health Planning<br />
Planning<br />
and was recently reappointed to this role. A fourth involve-<br />
Council<br />
is that of Donal R. Sparkman, M.D., who is both a member of the<br />
ment<br />
Management Group of the Comprehensive State Health Planning<br />
Program<br />
a member of the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
and<br />
objective of this law is to encourage cooperative<br />
Another<br />
among governmental and non-governmental organizations and<br />
efforts<br />
agencies in education, welfare, and rehabilitation. A national<br />
similar<br />
announced by President Lyndon B. Johnson calls for "good health<br />
goal<br />
every citizen to the limits of our country's capacity to provide<br />
for<br />
it."<br />
are assuming that health is a human right. Two corollaries<br />
We<br />
this become self-evident: One, that every person should have ready<br />
of<br />
to high quality personal health services; two, that every person<br />
access<br />
live in an environment which is safe from preventable hazard<br />
should<br />
and conducive to healthful and productive living.<br />
Government Reorganization<br />
October 1965, a study by the Council for Reorganization<br />
In<br />
Washington State Government reported detailed evaluations of 37<br />
of<br />
departments, agencies, commissions, and boards of the executive<br />
major<br />
of government of the State of Washington. Vocational rehabili-<br />
branch<br />
services were not given much attention in the Council's printed<br />
tation<br />
report.<br />
November 1968, a second report by a task force on execu-<br />
In<br />
organization which had been appointed earlier in 1968 by Governor<br />
tive<br />
J. Evans, was published. The chairman for this study was<br />
Daniel<br />
C. Denny, Dean of the Graduate School of Public Affairs,<br />
Brewster<br />
206
of Washington. This bipartisan group invited a number of<br />
University<br />
officials to testify. This task force reported as follows:<br />
governmental<br />
government today faces a crisis. Every year, the<br />
State<br />
played by government in our lives becomes more impor-<br />
role<br />
Relations between the chief executive and those who<br />
tant.<br />
with him continually grow more complex. An expanding<br />
work<br />
bureaucracy increasingly impinges on areas once<br />
federal<br />
the primary responsibility of the state. Govern-<br />
thought<br />
machinery that functioned well enough in a simpler<br />
mental<br />
is no more adequate to cope with today's complex<br />
time<br />
problems than is an abacus in the age of the computer.<br />
Task Force has sought in its study of the structure of<br />
This<br />
government to identify specific problems impeding the<br />
state<br />
of the executive branch of state government to meet<br />
capacity<br />
expanding and changing responsibilities and to propose<br />
its<br />
solutions which can be promptly implemented.<br />
One of their recommendations was.to:<br />
the Department of Employment Security, the<br />
Consolidate<br />
of Labor and Industries and the Division of<br />
Department<br />
Rehabilitation of the Coordinating Council for<br />
Vocational<br />
Education into a Department of Manpower and<br />
Occupational<br />
Industry<br />
In another part of their report they wrote as follows:<br />
can be argued with some justification that the Vocational<br />
It<br />
should be placed within the Department of<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
and Health Services. Our rationale for including<br />
Social<br />
Rehabilitation inthe Department of Manpower and<br />
Vocational<br />
is that rehabilitation is a "manpower" function<br />
Industry.<br />
that its goal is to restore people to productive roles<br />
in<br />
society. Actually, Vocational Rehabilitation stands<br />
in<br />
in the center between a health-welfare and a man-<br />
somewhat<br />
service, ls treatment methods are closely allied<br />
power<br />
the health and social work fields, its end result with<br />
with<br />
Therefore, it could probably go with equal but<br />
employment.<br />
logic to either the Department of Social and Health<br />
different<br />
or to the Department of Manpower and Industry.<br />
Services<br />
approval willbe required for the consolidation being<br />
Federal<br />
here, but preliminary inquiry indicated that such<br />
proposed<br />
can be obtained.<br />
approval<br />
1969 State Legislature rejected bills which would have<br />
The<br />
reorganization recommended by the task force. The Voca-<br />
effectedthe<br />
Rehabilitation program, at least until another session of the<br />
tional<br />
remains under the Coordinating Council for Occupational<br />
Legislature,<br />
Education.<br />
207
Administrative Aspects<br />
Pub lic relations<br />
W. Gardner, in a statement written when he was Secretary<br />
John<br />
the U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and published<br />
of<br />
in NO EASY VICTORIES in 1968, discussed leadership in this way:<br />
have a significant role. in creating the state of<br />
Leaders<br />
that isthe society. They can serve as symbols of the<br />
mind<br />
unity of the society. They can express the values<br />
moral<br />
hold the society together. Most important, they can<br />
that<br />
and articulate goals that lift people out of their<br />
conceive<br />
preoccupations, carry them above the conflicts that<br />
petty<br />
a society apart, and unite them in the pursuit of<br />
tear<br />
worthy of their best efforts.<br />
objectives<br />
money available for rehabilitation services and the staff<br />
The<br />
to administer those services in this and every other state<br />
provided<br />
been inadequate to meet the tremendous demand of rehabilitating<br />
has<br />
individuals. When services were provided well, counselors<br />
handicapped<br />
more referrals than they could handle. Formal public rela-<br />
.received<br />
programs were not considered necessary. As. Vocational Rehabili-<br />
tions<br />
in the State of Washington has grown in size and stature, the<br />
tation<br />
on it have gone up far faster.<br />
demands<br />
the period of work of the Planning Commission for Voca-<br />
In<br />
Rehabilitation there were very few stories in the newspapers<br />
tional<br />
the state about Vocational Rehabilitation. Almost all the stories<br />
of<br />
were the result of local effort rather than efforts of the<br />
printed<br />
Officer of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. If<br />
Information<br />
stories had been published praising the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
more<br />
and indicating that services were available to handicapped<br />
program<br />
then the result may have been greater disappointment to more<br />
people,<br />
applicants.<br />
attention could have been called during Fiscal<br />
Certainly<br />
1969 to the plight of the Vocational Rehabilitation agency.<br />
Year<br />
after only five months of services in the fiscal year,<br />
Essentially,<br />
budget reduction made at the Federal level devastated the agency.<br />
a<br />
additional client services could be authorized, with a few exceptions,<br />
No<br />
the remaining seven months of the fiscal year. This meant that<br />
for<br />
the period December I, 1968 through the end of June, 1969, clients<br />
from<br />
for Vocational Rehabilitation services were necessarily told<br />
referred<br />
services would be postponed. There was little money even for<br />
that<br />
care to help determine if a client might be eligible for<br />
diagnostic<br />
services.<br />
the consternation of the staff members, the effect<br />
Despite<br />
the cut on morale, and on the pipeline of referrals and services,<br />
of<br />
attention outside the agency was sought. Not a single press<br />
no<br />
was prepared explaining the facts to the public. The Legis-<br />
release<br />
was not even informed of the havoc caused by the Federal cutback<br />
lature<br />
the middle of a-fiscal year. A Pollyanna attitude was the only<br />
during<br />
one presented to the public.<br />
208
editorial by the State Director, E. M. Oliver, in the<br />
An<br />
issue, 1968, of the Vocational Rehabilitation OUTLOOK, is quoted<br />
winter<br />
in full, as follows:<br />
than $7.5 million will be added to earned personal<br />
More<br />
in Washington State in 1968 as result of handi-<br />
incomes<br />
individuals becoming self-supporting through the<br />
capped<br />
of the State Divisionof Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
programs<br />
than 4,500 persons, including dependents of the handi-<br />
More<br />
benefited directly from the Division's services.<br />
capped,<br />
attention is focused on the efficiency and productivity<br />
While<br />
handicapped employees, the public also should be aware<br />
of<br />
the significance of its investment in the rehabilitation<br />
of<br />
individuals with physical, mental, vocational and other<br />
of<br />
handicaps.<br />
of the rehabilitated in fiscal year 1968 increased<br />
Incomes<br />
average of nearly eight times after rehabilitation, with<br />
an<br />
earnings per individual averaging more than $83.<br />
weekly<br />
75 percent of the nearly 2,000 persons<br />
Approximately<br />
were unemployed before receiving state<br />
rehabilitated<br />
services. The remainder were individuals<br />
rehabilitation<br />
sheltered workshops and others in short-tenure jobs<br />
in<br />
hope of steady income.<br />
without<br />
experts point out that education and train-<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
for Jobs is of major significance to the handicapped<br />
ing<br />
it is to all segments of our growing population. The<br />
as<br />
is given in relation to the fact that 16 percent of<br />
comment<br />
rehabilitants had less than eighth grade education and<br />
the<br />
percent had completed the ninth, tenth or eleventh<br />
25<br />
grades. Only 44 percent had graduated from high school.<br />
fiscal 1968, the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
In<br />
nearly 22,000 clients or potential clients. This<br />
served<br />
an increase of 34 percent over the preceding fiscal year.<br />
was<br />
dependents, some rehabilitants had as many as i0,<br />
Concerning<br />
while others had none other than themselves.<br />
New Year will have real meaning for an increasing, number<br />
The<br />
individuals who will receive services, be rehabilitated<br />
of<br />
and earn higher incomes.<br />
report, to a degree, is unbalanced. It is a promotional job<br />
This<br />
than one showing both good and bad aspects of the rehabilitation<br />
rather<br />
The caseload statistics published by the Rehabilitation Ser-<br />
program.<br />
Administration for the state Vocational Rehabilitation agencies<br />
vices<br />
1968gives a less sanguine picture. For example, it shows that<br />
in<br />
the United States, as a whole, rehabilitated 20 perce.nt more in 1968<br />
while<br />
209
in 1967, Washington State rehabilitated only 4 percent,more in 1968<br />
than<br />
in 1967. Washington State ranked 49th among the states in number<br />
than<br />
of persons rehabilitated during Fiscal Year 1968.<br />
of persons rehabilitated per 100,000 population, by reEion end state; and rank<br />
Number<br />
state, 1964-1968<br />
by<br />
Rehabilitated per i00,000<br />
Region<br />
i/<br />
and<br />
State i968 1967 1966 195 1964<br />
U. S. Total 104 87 78 70 63<br />
Washington 57 57 44 42 36<br />
1968<br />
1967<br />
Renk<br />
1965 1964<br />
"i966<br />
44 46<br />
is roundsd nearest whole number, based the estimated total population of July I, for each fiscal<br />
Rats<br />
Bureau of the Census Series P-25.<br />
year.<br />
good and the bad aspects of the Vocational Rehabili-<br />
The<br />
program should be publicized. The weaknesses, the omissions,<br />
tation<br />
limitations--not just the success stories--should be reported.<br />
the<br />
has too much to offer to fear that a balanced presen-<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
will have a negative impact on the public. It is likely that<br />
tation<br />
a balanced presentation of rehabilitation, "warts and all," would<br />
such<br />
achieve even better public relations.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
information conferences and meetings be held for high<br />
That<br />
and college students to introduce them to training<br />
school<br />
career opportunities available in vocational rehabili-<br />
and<br />
tation.<br />
techniques could be suggested to improve public re-<br />
Several<br />
of th Vocational Rehabilitation agency.<br />
lations<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
vocational rehabilitation use personnel to contact<br />
That<br />
working with the handicapped to increase awareness<br />
people<br />
the vocational rehabilitation program in the state. The<br />
of<br />
of the agency to help handicapped and disadvantaged<br />
abilities<br />
people and its limitations should be described.<br />
210
Administrative and Operations Studies of Rehabilitation Agency<br />
standards are used for describing clients. They are<br />
Federal<br />
into categories which are designated by numbers and names. As<br />
put<br />
categories are used throughout the country, somewhat comparable<br />
these<br />
can be obtained about various state rehabilitation programs. The<br />
data<br />
data is not publicized much by Vocational Rehabilitation in<br />
following<br />
State of Washington.<br />
the<br />
EXPENDITURES IN DIAGNOSTICS (statuses 00 (Referral) and<br />
TOTAL<br />
(Applicant) FOR CASES CLOSED 08 (Closed from Referral) from<br />
02<br />
(Referral), 02 (Applicant), 04 (Six-monthEvaluation) and<br />
00<br />
(Eighteen-month Evaluation); NUMBER OF CASES AND AMOUNT IN<br />
06<br />
DOLLARS.<br />
Year 1968<br />
Fiscal<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
VOCATIONAL<br />
State of Washington<br />
ACTUAL VALUES<br />
STATUS: No..of Cases Total $<br />
CLOSURE<br />
from: Costs<br />
08<br />
00' 1606 $2,472<br />
Referral<br />
02 3365 62,361<br />
Applicant<br />
Evaluation 04 18 1,464<br />
6-Month<br />
Evaluation 06 55 5,945<br />
18-Month<br />
TOTAL 5044 $72,242<br />
means that in one year more than 5,000 people were con-<br />
This<br />
as potentially eligible for vocational rehabilitation services<br />
sidered<br />
examined further. More than $72,000 was spent on special examina-<br />
until<br />
to help determine eligibility.<br />
tions<br />
was an even greater cost for staff time. The largest<br />
There<br />
cost in.a vocational ehabilitation agency is the cost of a<br />
single<br />
counseling staff.<br />
the degree that counselors and other staff work with more<br />
To<br />
the per unit cost can be lowered. In Washington State<br />
individuals,<br />
counselors work successfully with fewer clients each year. In the<br />
the<br />
States last year 12 people were rehabilitated per man-year of<br />
United<br />
.211
in Washington State 8 persons were rehabilitated per employee<br />
staff;<br />
With the use of ancillary staff, interagency cooperation,<br />
man-year.<br />
an expectation that more clients will be served, the trend will<br />
and<br />
reversed. Than it would be seen that counselors would each year<br />
be<br />
larger numbers of successful rehabilitants. "The greatest good<br />
have<br />
the greatest number" may seem 19th century to us, but it does not<br />
for<br />
seem wrong.<br />
Harbridge House<br />
number of states have utilized Harbridge House, Inc. of<br />
A<br />
Massachusetts, a consulting firm for rehabilitation agencies,<br />
Boston,<br />
assess the functioning of selected parts of the Vocational Rehab-<br />
to<br />
agency. This management consulting firm has much expertise<br />
ilitation<br />
the field of vocational rehabilitation. It is sympathetic to the<br />
in<br />
program but can be objective about individuals and<br />
rehabilitation<br />
working in any particular state. The results of their studies<br />
agencies<br />
constructive ones. The cost of the studies is modest compared to<br />
are<br />
resulting increase in efficiency of the programs of rehabilita-<br />
the<br />
tion.<br />
Harbridge House studies are based in part upon theoretic<br />
The<br />
developed by the consultants, in part on the. numerous studies;<br />
models<br />
rehabilitation programs in other states, and in part on an inten-<br />
of<br />
brief study of the rehabilitation program they are examining.<br />
sive<br />
studies of the vocational rehabilitation agencies<br />
Typical<br />
Harbridge House, Inc. include the following: services to clients;<br />
by<br />
and expenditure patterns; state agency operations; personnel;<br />
funding<br />
communications; program review and control; planning and<br />
internal<br />
program development; and a cost/benefit analysis.<br />
has been no study by an outside consultant firm of<br />
There<br />
kind of the Vocational Rehabilitation program in the State of<br />
this<br />
Washington.<br />
recommend that such a study be undertaken by Harbridge<br />
We<br />
Inc. in 1969.<br />
House,<br />
the five years prior to the beginning of the Planning<br />
In<br />
an average.of $1.3 million of federal funds appropriated for<br />
Project,<br />
vocational rehabilitation of handicapped citizens of Washington<br />
the<br />
reverted unused. This much money could have been used to rehabili-<br />
was<br />
an additional 600 persons a year, or 3,000 more people. "Third<br />
tate<br />
funding" would have permitted the utilization of this federal<br />
party<br />
in our state without any additional state or local appropria-<br />
money<br />
tions.<br />
Interagency Coordination ThroughMulti-Service Centers<br />
of the limitations of the present organization is that<br />
One<br />
rehabilitation staff members counseling handicapped individuals<br />
the<br />
212
isolated geographically and emotionally from other state employees<br />
are<br />
in the helping professions. There is far too little coordina-<br />
involved<br />
with the other state agencies. The reports of ur task forces<br />
tion<br />
with interagency coordination have been specific about this<br />
concerned<br />
For example, a person in a prison is likely to be eligible<br />
matter.<br />
vocational rehabilitation services on the basis that he will have<br />
for<br />
vocational handicap at the time of his parole or discharge from the<br />
a<br />
In this state, he would be handled by the Department of Insti-<br />
prison.<br />
while in prison. As he leaves the prison, let's assume, he<br />
tutions<br />
be involved with a parole officer. If he begins to look for<br />
would<br />
he would be seen by the Employment Security Department.<br />
employment<br />
man is likely to feel very frustrated as he goes from agency to<br />
This<br />
in different parts of the town seeking help. If he receives<br />
agency<br />
the other agencies the same kind of initial rejection which he<br />
from<br />
likely to receive from the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation--<br />
is<br />
he is put on a waiting list and told that he would be contacted in<br />
if<br />
months or so--then he is not likely to have effective govern-<br />
three<br />
services which will rehabilitate him. It would seem that the<br />
mental<br />
government might well consider having these several agencies<br />
state<br />
under one umbrella agency to help insure the availability of<br />
combined<br />
to the handicapped person at the time he needs it. Rehabili-<br />
services<br />
services deferred are likely to be rehabilitation services<br />
tation<br />
denied.<br />
these several state agencies are not combined into one<br />
If<br />
paper, perhaps they can be housed in each community in such a way<br />
on<br />
they will function as one. The multi-purpose center concept is<br />
that<br />
one being described here.<br />
the<br />
Multi-Service Centers<br />
complex array of services designed to meet citizens needs<br />
The<br />
be applied more efficiently. This can best be accomplished through<br />
must<br />
systemof multi-service centers. In such centers the whole stress of<br />
a<br />
action will shift from rigidly separate departmental pro-<br />
government<br />
as employment, rehabilitation, financial assistance--to a<br />
grams--such<br />
attack on the problems of the individual or family.<br />
unified<br />
through such a coordinated program can we expect to<br />
Only<br />
their economic independence to remove them from welfare rolls<br />
establish<br />
and from prolonged dependence on government.<br />
multi-service center will bring together, at a centralized<br />
A<br />
within a poverty area, all state resources which can be mobil-<br />
location<br />
to meet the needs of all disadvantaged citizens. Development of<br />
ized<br />
centers will be coordinated with appropriate federal, county and<br />
such<br />
agencies and community action groups. Such pooling of services<br />
local<br />
make available to citizens a meaningful program to improve their<br />
will<br />
economic and social status. A multi-service center has<br />
vocational,<br />
in Seattle since 1967. Its success is the forerunner of a<br />
operated<br />
network of such centers planned for Washington State.<br />
213
concept of service seeks to remove some of the barriers<br />
This<br />
have kept government services from effectively penetrating the<br />
which<br />
Indian reservations, migrant labor camps--barriers such as<br />
ghettos,<br />
facilities, inadequate transportation for the poor, frag-<br />
scattered<br />
mentation of services, and endless referrals.<br />
scope of the multi-service center will vary with the<br />
The<br />
of the community, If such a center is already operating in<br />
needs<br />
community, an effort will be made to supplement or complement<br />
the<br />
already is being done. Services will be removed from the center<br />
which<br />
evaluation indicates the need has been eliminated. State services<br />
when<br />
the centers will be drawn in part from the following present ele-<br />
in<br />
ments of government:<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Division<br />
Qf Labor and Industries<br />
Department<br />
of Health<br />
Department<br />
of Public Assistance<br />
Department<br />
Security Department<br />
Employment<br />
of Economic Opportunity<br />
Office<br />
of Institutions<br />
Department<br />
Rehabilitation Council<br />
Veterans'<br />
agencies (including the Office of State<br />
Education<br />
of Public Instruction, State<br />
Superintendent<br />
for Community College Education,<br />
Board<br />
of higher learning)<br />
institutions<br />
centers are intended to reduce citizen depen-<br />
Multi-service<br />
on welfare through job training, placement and related programs.<br />
dence<br />
achieve this goal, it is necessary to strengthen both departmental<br />
To<br />
and commitment to the basic objective of government--meeting<br />
resources<br />
needs of citizens. Coordination of such services has been an ob-<br />
the<br />
long sought after but seldom achieved. Differences in sources<br />
jective<br />
authority, philosophy, techniques, interest groups and attitudes<br />
of<br />
departments of state government present the major obstacles to the<br />
of<br />
successful operation of multi-service centers.<br />
Ne__wCon__ts.with Multi-Service Centers<br />
of these differences has prompted introduction<br />
Recognition<br />
other states of important and novel concepts of state services,<br />
in<br />
namely:<br />
Establishment of a common intake unit serving<br />
i.<br />
but separate departmental units.<br />
allied<br />
Development of a systematic, coordinated approach<br />
2.<br />
provide a "prescription program" aimed at<br />
to<br />
assuring economic independence for individuals.<br />
214
Establishment of a field follow-up system<br />
3.<br />
evaluate progress and, where necessary,<br />
to<br />
alter the coordinated "prescription programs.<br />
the lack of coordination which frequently characterizes<br />
Thus<br />
autonomous service programs will be reduced. Under the new<br />
existing<br />
all departments sacrifice a certain amount of autonomy in the<br />
model<br />
of the greater objective of concerted unified service focused<br />
interest<br />
upon the citizen.<br />
Administrative Locations of the State Vocational Rehabilitation Agency<br />
administrative location of the State Rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
has been a matter of highest concern to the Planning Commission.<br />
Agency<br />
considerable time has been spent trying to develop a consensus. The<br />
A<br />
to this year has been concerned with this matter. Biennial<br />
Legislature<br />
estimates for the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation pre-<br />
budget<br />
in the summer of 1968, contain the following statement:<br />
pared<br />
service .techniques are more advanced than<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
the capacities of administration to secure funds and<br />
are<br />
to augment these service techniques. These problems<br />
staff<br />
organization and administration have serious conse-<br />
of<br />
in relation to the speed and effect£veess with<br />
quences<br />
services are delivered to needy individuals. There<br />
which<br />
recognition that all governmental service programs<br />
is<br />
from inadequate coordination. We tried to learn<br />
suffer<br />
such a commonly recognized problem is so persistently<br />
why<br />
us.<br />
with<br />
his inaugural address on January 15, 1969, Governor<br />
In<br />
J. Evans, in speaking toga joint, session of the Legislature<br />
Daniel<br />
andby radio to all the people, said in part:<br />
THE REORGANIZATION PRIORITY<br />
decisions of government are too important and the conse-<br />
The<br />
too grave to allow the executive branch to function<br />
quences<br />
an organization designed to serve the past, and with<br />
with<br />
which make it impossible to serve the future.<br />
restrictions<br />
is time to reconstruct the executive branch of govern-<br />
It<br />
so that we can begin to manage the business of the<br />
ment<br />
instead of just cope with it; so that we can bring<br />
people,<br />
services of government to bear quickly on emerging<br />
the<br />
of dividing our functions through dozens<br />
problems--instead<br />
functions in far too many separate departments and<br />
of<br />
agencies.<br />
215
cannot be run exactly like a business--but<br />
Government<br />
does it say that government must be run in ignor-<br />
nowhere<br />
of business principles. And nowhere can you find<br />
ance<br />
for the contention that size is a realistic<br />
justification<br />
substitute for efficiency.<br />
the next several days, this administration will<br />
Within<br />
a series of bills dealing with the reorganization<br />
introduce<br />
the executive branch of government. Six of these have<br />
of<br />
recommended by the Task Force on Executive Organiza-<br />
been<br />
a bipartisan group of citizens whom I believe, share<br />
tion,<br />
average citizen's concern that government should be<br />
the<br />
to meet the needs of the people, and not to serve<br />
designed<br />
pleasure of its tenants.<br />
the<br />
shall either reorganize or we shall suffocate in the<br />
We<br />
of an outdated and ineffective system of adminis-<br />
quicksand<br />
The details are debatable, but the principle is<br />
tration.<br />
we must forge a government structure which can plan<br />
clear:<br />
and a structure which can deliver whole<br />
comprehensively<br />
to whole problems. I believe.this Legislature<br />
solutions<br />
respond to the very real needs of executive reorganiza-<br />
will<br />
tion.<br />
PLANNING without action is futile;<br />
ACTION without pannng is fatal.<br />
216
Personnel Recruitment, Training, and Utilization<br />
a speech to the professional staff of Vocational Rehabili-<br />
In<br />
in February, 1966, Mr. H. @. Socolofsky, Assistant Director for<br />
tation<br />
Field Services, said:<br />
What New Programs and Which New Services?<br />
the beginning, let me say Sincerely that the Vocational<br />
In<br />
Officer is the key professional worker in<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Division, and therefore your opinions and suggestions<br />
the<br />
of prime importance in planning the future of the<br />
are<br />
Division.<br />
has made interesting breakthroughs in certain<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
areas and has arrived at solutions which, prudently and care-<br />
problem<br />
applied, can have a major impact on many of the social problems<br />
fully<br />
our times. What is rehabilitation'sgreatest challenge? It is<br />
of<br />
quality, adequacy, and multiplicity of the ability of the voca-<br />
the<br />
rehabilitation program to staff this effort. We are experi-<br />
tional<br />
fantastic growth and planning for even greater growth in the<br />
encing<br />
several years. How do you find the proper people to run vital<br />
next<br />
of overly-rapid expansion? In a very real way rehabilitation<br />
areas<br />
confronted with the same set of problems that confronts any dynamic<br />
is<br />
and governmental agency. It is necessary to gamble on exist-<br />
industry<br />
technology and knowledge to elevate people, into areas for which<br />
ing<br />
are not equipped, to find short cuts to equip these people as<br />
they<br />
as possible, to recruit, to retrain, and to upgrade. These<br />
well<br />
critical problems confront both rehabilitation and business.<br />
As John Gardner stated so well,<br />
plain fact is that all over this country today trouble<br />
The<br />
brewing and social evils accumulating while our patterns<br />
is<br />
social and professional organization keep able and gifted<br />
of<br />
leaders on the sidelines.<br />
potential<br />
laws, dollars and programs don't teach children nor<br />
Federal<br />
thesick. Teachers teach children and doctors heal<br />
heal<br />
sick--individual teachers and doctors in the schools and<br />
the<br />
of Atlanta and Seattle and Phoenix. In other words,<br />
clinics<br />
depends upon increased vitality out where the<br />
everything<br />
is.<br />
action<br />
the field of government, rehabilitation has retained a<br />
In<br />
quality of talent. The day-to-day work of rehabilitation re-<br />
select<br />
a unique degree of skill. But what is more important, most<br />
quires<br />
people sincerely and intensely believe that their work<br />
rehabilitation<br />
important and productive. It is different with some helping agencies--<br />
is<br />
recruit many talented workers, but the extreme frustration of<br />
they<br />
being unable to see tangible accomplishments in their daily efforts<br />
217
off the best talent. If a ten-year cycle of an average govern-<br />
drives<br />
agency were analyzed, the amount of talent flowing through<br />
mental<br />
appear impressive, but the amount retained would appear very<br />
would<br />
indeed. In much of the United States this has not been true<br />
modest<br />
rehabilitation, where talent is both obtained and retained. It is<br />
of<br />
however, always used wisely, and this is an rea of serious<br />
not,<br />
problems.<br />
ability of rehabilitation to recruit talent from the<br />
The<br />
centers shows a different problem than business has.<br />
university<br />
can give a counselor freedom to practice his unique<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
and that is what a talented, creative person wants. This<br />
expertise<br />
exists in some rehabilitation agencies, but not in all. It<br />
freedom<br />
not exist to the degree that is desirable and often seems to<br />
does<br />
despite rather than because of the efforts of key administrators<br />
exist<br />
It exists simply because the program has grown so rapidly<br />
involved.<br />
administrators have not been entirely able to control it and<br />
that<br />
talent has been able to advance faster into wider areas of author-<br />
new<br />
ity and discretio than they could normally expect.<br />
Needs in Rehabilitation ""UIS. Estimated Needs<br />
Personnel<br />
Annually<br />
Immediately<br />
Rehabilitation counselors<br />
i.<br />
Physiatrists<br />
2.<br />
Prosthetists-orthotists<br />
3.<br />
Speech pathologists-audiologists<br />
4.<br />
Occupational therapists<br />
5.<br />
Physical therapists<br />
6.<br />
Social workers in rehabilitation<br />
7.<br />
Rehabilitation nurses<br />
8.<br />
Psychologists<br />
9.<br />
Rehabilitation of the. deaf<br />
i0.<br />
Rehabilitation of the blind<br />
ii.<br />
Rehabilitation facilities administration<br />
12.<br />
3,000<br />
1,600<br />
500<br />
2,000<br />
180<br />
500<br />
1,500<br />
2,000<br />
4,000<br />
12,000<br />
4,000<br />
13,500<br />
3,000<br />
15,000<br />
i00<br />
i00<br />
250<br />
250<br />
50<br />
175<br />
50<br />
150<br />
i00<br />
i00<br />
STATE DATA BOOK, 1966. U.S.<br />
From:<br />
of Health, Education<br />
Department<br />
and Welfare.<br />
larger growth problem impinges upon the more specific<br />
The<br />
of staffing. Educational centers can produce only a certain<br />
problem<br />
of needed personnel, and these sometimes lack the needed level<br />
number<br />
sophistication, intensity and practical experience. The vocational<br />
of<br />
counselor expertise has been developed over years of<br />
rehabilitation<br />
but certain aspects of it have remained isolated in the<br />
experience,<br />
of a few people who have not found ways of communicating it to<br />
minds<br />
newer personnel entering the field.<br />
the<br />
218
leaflet prepared in September, 1967, by Professor J. R.<br />
A<br />
Ph.D., describes the Rehabilitation Counselor Education<br />
Forster,<br />
Program of the University of Washington as follows:<br />
The program was developed to provide educational<br />
Purpose:<br />
leading to a masters degree.for prospective and<br />
experiences<br />
practicing vocational rehabilitation counselors.<br />
Descriptive Information:<br />
program was initiated with partial funding by the<br />
The<br />
Rehabilitation Administration in 1966, after<br />
Vocational<br />
planning by the College and Education and the<br />
joint<br />
of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.<br />
Department<br />
program is a two-hear (six quarters) academic program<br />
The<br />
to a Master of Education degree in Rehabilitation<br />
leading<br />
Included in the program are courses taken in<br />
Counseling.<br />
College of Education, Physical Medicine and Rehabili-<br />
the<br />
Social Work, and Psychology. The students parti-<br />
tation,<br />
in internships at local rehabilitation agencies two<br />
cipate<br />
days a week during the entire second year of their program.<br />
full-time trainees and one part-time student<br />
Fourteen<br />
during the first academic year, 1966-67, and will<br />
attended<br />
into their second year in September, 1967. Ten<br />
continue<br />
thirteen new full-time trainees will begin their studies<br />
to<br />
the coming academic year, along with two to four<br />
during<br />
students.<br />
part-time<br />
the 1967-68 year, twenty-seven stipends of $1800 and<br />
For<br />
been authorized by VRA, along with support for<br />
$2000rhave<br />
two to four part-time.students.<br />
Long-Range Plans<br />
is expected that the regular student program will continue<br />
It<br />
the 1967-68 level with approximately 26 full-time trainees,<br />
at<br />
one-half of whom Will graduate each year.<br />
the confines of future financial resources, the pro-<br />
Within<br />
for part-time students will be developed to meet what-<br />
gram<br />
needs are expressed by the Washington Division of Voca-<br />
ever<br />
Rehabilitation and other rehabilitation agencies for<br />
tional<br />
training of their regular personnel. (There is evidence<br />
the<br />
a substantial proportion of the Washington Vocational<br />
that<br />
Officers are interested in further graduate<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
training if release time for such efforts is available.)<br />
level<br />
the curriculum and administrative program become more<br />
As<br />
settled, plans for expanded research in the field will<br />
firmly<br />
be developed.<br />
219
Rehabilitation has not as a rule studied how<br />
Vocational<br />
it uses skilled people. Every device possible should be<br />
effectively<br />
at the counselor's disposal to maximize the amount of time he<br />
put<br />
within his professional competence. We forget the amount of<br />
spends<br />
professional talent spent in clerical activi>y. Little real<br />
rare<br />
has been spent devising methodsof supporting skilled personnel<br />
effort<br />
lesser skilled help. Specialization of function of professional<br />
with<br />
members with ample clerical and stenographic support can enhance<br />
staff<br />
the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program.<br />
ratio of secretaries to counselors, which in the State<br />
The<br />
Washington has been less than one to one, should be changed so<br />
of<br />
more of the work is done by clerical personnel. Case aides also<br />
that<br />
be used in this way. It is important that the racial or ethnic<br />
can<br />
be considered in the selection of case aides. Indians, for<br />
factor<br />
should be selected to work as case aides with other Indians.<br />
example,<br />
Americans or Mexican Americans who have been in the migrant<br />
Spanish<br />
and speak the languate of the migrants should be selected to<br />
stream<br />
work with these people. Perhaps a fifth of all staff members<br />
help<br />
be case aides. If case aides are selected as people who can<br />
should<br />
well with others they are likely to be more effective as change<br />
work<br />
than the counselors who are now employed. They work for less.<br />
agents<br />
has been proposed that in the larger offices a video tape machine<br />
It<br />
provided to record these initial interviews of the clients. The<br />
be<br />
of these interviews, privately of course, can be used as<br />
screening<br />
teaching technique and can also be used to inform the counselor<br />
a<br />
about the initial needs of his potential clients.<br />
Planning Commission has been concerned with the staff<br />
The<br />
to handicapped persons. As a result,<br />
services<br />
THE CO4ISSION RECOMMENDS<br />
an intensive series of training programs be expanded<br />
That<br />
adequately financed for personnel at all levels within<br />
and<br />
vocational rehabilitation.<br />
training programs.for non-college bound youth be estab-<br />
That<br />
to prepare them for para-professional positions in<br />
lished<br />
rehabilitation.<br />
since the basic role of persons in some helping pro-<br />
That<br />
is similar, part of the training programs for new<br />
fessions<br />
and in-service training programs for those in<br />
employees<br />
employment should be together. Those trained together<br />
state<br />
be rehabilitation counselors, employment security<br />
would<br />
public assistance caseworkers, probation and<br />
counselors,<br />
officers, public health nurses, and the like. This<br />
parole<br />
of the training could be done under the State Depart-<br />
part<br />
ment of Personnel.<br />
220
a program of undergraduate college education in rehabili-<br />
That<br />
beinstituted.<br />
tation<br />
has been proposed that there be a different method for<br />
It<br />
rehabilitation counselors. At this time they are chosen<br />
selecting<br />
upon the basis of their academic background and profes-<br />
principally<br />
experience. People selected in this way are not necessarily<br />
sional<br />
with the personal, qualities of genuineness, empathy and warmth,<br />
those<br />
as the effective and desirable counseling traits in changing<br />
regarded<br />
behavior. Methods to select people with these characteristics<br />
client<br />
being developed.<br />
are<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
an orientation and training program be initiated and<br />
That<br />
for fieldrehabilitation counselors to inform them<br />
continued<br />
demonstration, seminars andvisits to facilities<br />
through<br />
the state of the problems faced by clients with heart<br />
within<br />
cancer, stroke and other severely disabling conditions.<br />
disease,<br />
efforts should be made to recruit staff members who<br />
Greater<br />
received formal training in rehabilitation counseling.<br />
have<br />
staff members should be offered such training on a<br />
Present<br />
part-time basis or by correspondence.<br />
has been further suggested that the time of the counselor<br />
It<br />
too valuable to be frittered away in_clerical tasks and adminis-<br />
is<br />
duties which can be done as well or better by others. The<br />
trative<br />
job can be done at less cost if counselors are utilized princi-<br />
total<br />
as change agents or counselors and not as high priced completers<br />
pally<br />
forms. The cost per client is rising at a rapid rate. This rate<br />
of<br />
be slowed or stopped if it were possible to free the counselor<br />
might<br />
his highest and best use, by utilizing case aides, secretaries,<br />
for<br />
and the like to do some of the work which until recently<br />
interviewers,<br />
been done by counselors.<br />
has<br />
interviewer could be assigned to see the client at the<br />
An<br />
he first comes to the office. A delay of not more than an hour<br />
time<br />
the most that should be imposed. At this time, clients in busy<br />
is<br />
are sometimes not seen for three months. This can have<br />
offices<br />
consequences for the client who needs immediate services.<br />
catastrophic<br />
interviewer can be a clerical staff member who is able to meet<br />
The<br />
the clients in a helpful way. The client would be helped.to<br />
with<br />
any necessary forms. The basic data gathering would be<br />
complete<br />
at that time. The general medical examination form could<br />
initiated<br />
completed and the authorization made for the examination. Records<br />
be<br />
other institutions and transcripts of academic work could be<br />
from<br />
If the interviewer were new on the job or were having<br />
obtained.<br />
making a decision about a particular client, then she<br />
difficulty<br />
ask for assistance from one of the counselors. Normally, before<br />
could<br />
examinations were authorized e.g., orthopedic examinations,<br />
specialty<br />
examinations, the counselor could be contacted.<br />
psychiatric<br />
221
is recommended that there be a new job title in large<br />
It<br />
People so employed would be compensated at<br />
offices--"interviewer."<br />
higher rate than other clerical staff members. The person so<br />
a<br />
would normally be employed from the clerical staff. They<br />
selected<br />
need to be able to do their usual clerical-stenographic duties<br />
would<br />
well as the basic interviewing.<br />
as<br />
THE COMMISSION RECO4ENDS:<br />
information conferences and meetings be held for high<br />
That<br />
and college students to introduce them to training<br />
school<br />
and career opportunities available in vocational rehabilitation.<br />
that the Federal and state laws have been amended to<br />
Now<br />
the socially disadvantaged eligible for vocational rehabilitatin<br />
make<br />
when other qualifications are met, it is all the more impor-<br />
services<br />
to have indigenous .case aides. These are people selected from<br />
tant<br />
the group of socially disadvantaged people who are to be served.<br />
Utilization of Completed Research<br />
THECOMMISSIONRECOMIENDS:<br />
increased efforts should also be made to computerize and<br />
That<br />
information retrieval processes.<br />
develop<br />
the 1960s rehabilitation did not have close ties with<br />
Until<br />
Research was a seldom-used tool until recently. There<br />
universities.<br />
now an acceleration of research.. The research information needs<br />
is<br />
be disseminated more widely among the people who have the oppor-<br />
to<br />
to utilize the information. A RESEARCH BRIEF describing efforts<br />
tunity<br />
bring research into effective focus follows:<br />
to<br />
222
esea rc<br />
ffective<br />
Vol. II, No. 8 February 3, 1969<br />
MANAGING THE INFORMATION EXPLOSION<br />
information explosion of recent years has<br />
The<br />
grave problems for all professional<br />
created<br />
who naturally wish to keep up with re-<br />
worlers,<br />
in their respective fields. Informative<br />
search<br />
of completed research on topics of in-<br />
abstracts<br />
can greatly help them to do this.<br />
terest<br />
an example of such a helpful enterprise, the<br />
As<br />
Rehabilitation Research Institute at the<br />
Regional<br />
of Florida prepared Management and<br />
University<br />
Abstracts, containing 1,000 abstracts<br />
Personnel<br />
management and personnel, indexed by key<br />
on<br />
The abstracts were selected from the<br />
words.<br />
issues of 51 journals in business, per-<br />
1964-67<br />
management, data processing, and re-<br />
sonnel,<br />
lated areas.<br />
following samples from the publication,<br />
The<br />
to highlight supervision as a management<br />
chosen<br />
illustrate the usefulness of such ab-<br />
function,<br />
Insofar as the utilization of effective<br />
stracts.<br />
results may, as one of its dividends,<br />
research<br />
management practices, such a collec-<br />
improve<br />
of abstracts also has great value for re-<br />
tion<br />
utilization. The capital letters in paren-<br />
search<br />
with the exception of "HMC," permit the<br />
thesis,<br />
to locate each abstract in the publication<br />
reader<br />
just as he would find a word in the dictionary.<br />
Recruitment<br />
While recruiters seek to attract and employ<br />
•<br />
candidates for jobs, the following "crimes,"<br />
top<br />
committed, are a sure guide to failure:<br />
often<br />
searching for a man before you know what<br />
begin<br />
really want or why; sidestep specific ques-<br />
you<br />
about agency objectives; avoid the need to<br />
tions<br />
between two or more good men byfalling<br />
decide<br />
contact them; delay decisions as long as pos-<br />
to<br />
pass the buck; never check references;<br />
sible;<br />
do not question applicant's competence.<br />
and<br />
(BAERJA RGS)<br />
The pitfalls of "oversell" in college recruit-<br />
•<br />
by business firms may have general manage-<br />
ing<br />
significance. "Oversell" conveys informa-<br />
ment<br />
directly or indirectly, which misrepresents<br />
tion,<br />
job or orga.nization in a favorable light.<br />
the<br />
deliberate, it usually results from over-<br />
Rarely<br />
or inaccurate information. It can<br />
enthusiasm<br />
impair an organization's reputation.<br />
gravely<br />
(ZWE RE. OMP)<br />
Ongoing Supervision<br />
For supervisors who are unsure of how to<br />
•<br />
their creative personnel, the following<br />
handle<br />
may help: the creative person is not<br />
guides<br />
by the same forces as run-of-the-mill<br />
motivated<br />
is harder to manage than others, often<br />
workers;<br />
a strong touch of egotism; should be<br />
having<br />
if possible by other creative persons;<br />
managed<br />
should be generously rewarded for good<br />
and<br />
work. (HMC, page 1}<br />
The evidence is that the unskilled worker<br />
•<br />
adjusts well to his routine job but gets<br />
usually<br />
real satisfaction from it. In view of this,<br />
little<br />
following motivators for unskilled workers<br />
the<br />
suggested: treat the man as if he were al-<br />
are<br />
what he could and should be; explain the<br />
ready<br />
emphasize its importance, and tell why it<br />
job,<br />
be done on time; recognize superior work<br />
must<br />
give credit when worker accomplishes some-<br />
and<br />
with the aid of others; allow reasonable<br />
thing<br />
symbols; make sure the employee has the<br />
status<br />
to participate in training programs; and<br />
chance<br />
train supervisors to<br />
recognize, understand, and<br />
with the attitudes of unskilled workers.<br />
deal<br />
MMU)<br />
(JANEHA<br />
Although the evidence is clear that managers<br />
•<br />
delegate authority, and managers know they<br />
must<br />
do all the work for which they are respon-<br />
cannot<br />
there are still many reasons why execu-<br />
sible,<br />
find it very hard to let subordinates help<br />
tives<br />
These include overestimation of the ex-<br />
them.<br />
to which they themselves can do the work<br />
tent<br />
and feelings of insecurity in their<br />
better,<br />
own jobs and in relationships with superiors.<br />
by the Research Utilization Branch, Division of Research and Demonstration Grants, Office of Research, Demonstrations, and<br />
*Prepared<br />
Social and Rehabilitation Service, Department of Health Education, and Welfare Washington., D.C. 2020.<br />
Training<br />
223
are given for improving delegation.<br />
Suggestions<br />
BBD)<br />
(GIBBCH<br />
The fine art of questioning can help to solve<br />
•<br />
interpersonal and organizational problems<br />
many<br />
from poor communication. The ques-<br />
arising<br />
when the goal is mutual understanding,<br />
tioner,<br />
create and maintain a good climate for<br />
should<br />
ask the right questions in the<br />
communication,<br />
way, and listen perceptively to all re-<br />
right<br />
Techniques for asking questions are<br />
sponses.<br />
discussed. (NATHER AAQ)<br />
Managers need to consider the degree of<br />
•<br />
in their work relations. Too often, strong<br />
honesty<br />
toward a person or group are denied or<br />
feelings<br />
Feelings, a real part of organizational<br />
ignored.<br />
are often disvalued, and their suppression<br />
life,<br />
the organization. Typically, the "avoid-<br />
harms<br />
pattern," based on the assumption that<br />
ance<br />
are either irrelevant or disruptive, is<br />
feelings<br />
It is better rouse "problem-orientedfeed-<br />
used.<br />
to individuals and groups, on the assump-<br />
back"<br />
that suppressed feelings cause organiza-<br />
tion<br />
and personal deterioration. (OSHRBA<br />
tional<br />
CAH)<br />
When management does not understand<br />
•<br />
needs, much conflict may result and the<br />
worker<br />
may flourish. Management can under-<br />
grapevine<br />
the grapevine by developing three basic<br />
cut<br />
skills: listen to what personnel<br />
communication<br />
what they do not say, and what they want<br />
say,<br />
say but do not. The grapevine can also be<br />
to<br />
by paying attention to five top factors<br />
weakened<br />
motivate employees: job security,<br />
which<br />
by peers and superiors, interesting<br />
recogn.,tion<br />
fringe benefits, and chance to advance.<br />
work,<br />
WDA)<br />
(MESCDRP.<br />
Since womenare in the working world to stay,<br />
•<br />
must learn how to utilize this grow-<br />
managers<br />
resource. Most women are not interested in<br />
ing<br />
rivals to man, but are motivated by<br />
being<br />
satisfactions from job and working<br />
intrinsic<br />
Make the work area congenial to them.<br />
place.<br />
for social contacts on the job. Bear in<br />
Allow<br />
their family obligations. Use their in-<br />
mind<br />
in people and welfare, their aptitude for<br />
terests<br />
effort, and their drive toward harmony.<br />
patient<br />
(LEVIH MWW)<br />
Evaluation<br />
Evaluation of personnel can provide top<br />
•<br />
with much information needed in<br />
management<br />
for the future, and give those being<br />
planning<br />
an idea of how well they are doing.<br />
appraised<br />
often, the second objective is not met, for<br />
Too<br />
is afraid to be critical. One way<br />
management<br />
avoid defensive attitudes in staff by includ-<br />
out:<br />
self-appraisal of performance and potential<br />
ing<br />
in evaluation interviews. (LANDM LHK)<br />
The employee appraisal interview must be<br />
•<br />
with an understanding of its sensitivity<br />
conducted<br />
both company and employee are to benefit. The<br />
if<br />
should reflect carefully beforehand<br />
supervisor<br />
the job, the man, and himself. Specifically,<br />
on<br />
should consider the framework into which the<br />
he<br />
job fits, criteria for acceptable per-<br />
man's<br />
on it, whether successful performance<br />
formance<br />
specific aptitudes, whether present job<br />
requires<br />
conducive to the person's growth in the<br />
is<br />
the person's past and present job<br />
organization,<br />
and how it may be explained, and<br />
performance<br />
the employee's attitude toward the inter-<br />
what<br />
may be. (NOLARC RBI)<br />
view<br />
Termination<br />
A well-conducted exit interview can produce<br />
•<br />
information for management. The in-<br />
valuable<br />
should be structured and unhurried,<br />
terview<br />
place in a private office, and be conducted<br />
take<br />
someone high enough in the organization to<br />
by<br />
and assess significant information and<br />
recognize<br />
remedial action when indicated. Despite its<br />
take<br />
validity, information so obtained can.<br />
limited<br />
much about employee attitudes, agency<br />
tell<br />
and a wide range of other matters<br />
procedures,<br />
which may need attention. (BAHNCH EUE)<br />
Research Brief is based on Management and Personnel Abstracts (edited by Dr. Neil S. Dumas), a product of RD-<br />
This<br />
of which Dr. John E. Muthardis Project Director. Copies of the publication are available from the grantee. Ad-<br />
1127-G,<br />
requests to KWIC Ii, Regional Rehabilitation Research Institute, J. Hillis Miller Health Center, University of<br />
dress<br />
Gainesville, Florida 32601.<br />
Florida,<br />
224
Planning Tppics<br />
Special<br />
Barriers<br />
Architectural<br />
fifth task force was concerned with barriers to employ-<br />
Our<br />
of the handicapped, including architectural barriers. Task force<br />
ment<br />
members were sent copies of the following listed documents:<br />
for All Americans: Report of Design he National<br />
on ArchitecturalBarriers to Rehabilitation<br />
Commission<br />
the Handicapped. U. S. Department of Health, Educa-<br />
of<br />
and Welfare, Rehabilitation Services Administration,<br />
tion,<br />
December 1967.<br />
Facilities Accessible to the Physically Handi-<br />
Making<br />
Performance Criteria, State University of New<br />
capped:<br />
York, Albany, New York, July 1967.<br />
Development and Effects of an Inexpensive Elevator<br />
The<br />
Eliminating Architectural Barriers in Public<br />
fo__r<br />
by Harold E. Yuker (and others). Hofstra<br />
Bu$1dings,<br />
Hempstead, New York, October 1966.<br />
University,<br />
the Doors, (folder) President"s Committee on<br />
He_Open<br />
of the Handicapped. Undated.<br />
Employment<br />
general, the reports of this task force indicate that<br />
In<br />
barriers are the major concern of those who have studied<br />
architectural<br />
situation. However, there seems to be a feeling of impotence on<br />
the<br />
part of the general informed public about action that might be<br />
the<br />
by them to reduce architectural barriers. The state law spon-<br />
taken<br />
by Representative Marjorie Lynch of Yakima in the 1967 Legis-<br />
sored<br />
making it mandatory that buildings constructed with state<br />
lature,<br />
be accessible to the handicapped was applauded. There seems to<br />
money<br />
the feeling that architects,, designers, and engineers should be<br />
be<br />
ones who should be knowledgeable about barriers, and that they<br />
the<br />
should be forced to eliminate barriers as much as they can.<br />
seemed to be general agreement that little can be<br />
There<br />
about buildings previously constructed. Efforts should be made<br />
done<br />
reduce the barriers in new construction and when there is major<br />
to<br />
Not only should all government owned and used build-<br />
reconstruction.<br />
such as schools, post offices, be accessible to the handicapped,<br />
ings<br />
transportation facilities, eating facilities, businesses, .and<br />
but<br />
like should be in buildings accessible to all major potential<br />
the<br />
users.<br />
an article entitled, "Escape From Confinement," January<br />
In<br />
Journal of Rehabilitation, Kurt Dreifuss said:<br />
1969<br />
225
years ago a group of physically handicapped persons<br />
Two<br />
Disabled Adults Residential Enterprises<br />
representing<br />
came to the Welfare Council of Metropolitan<br />
(DARE),<br />
to seek help in freeing severely handicapped<br />
Chicago<br />
from virtual imprisonment within their homes. They<br />
people<br />
for three things: architecturally barrier-free<br />
asked<br />
transportation to accommodate persons in wheel<br />
housing;<br />
on crutches, or otherwise using prosthetic aids to<br />
chairs,<br />
about; and greater opportunity for gainful employment,<br />
get<br />
recreation and participation in the normal life<br />
education,<br />
of .their community.<br />
an example of a task force report concerned with archi-<br />
As<br />
barriers, the following is presented. It was prepared under<br />
tectural<br />
direction of Mr. Bruce Johnson, Chairman of Task Force V, of<br />
the<br />
IV, which includes Olympia and Tacoma. Mrs. Sherman Pinto is<br />
Region<br />
General Chairman of this region. This task force recommended:<br />
the Commission urge the Governor to supplement<br />
That<br />
35, Laws of 1967, dealing with the elimination<br />
Chapter<br />
architectural barriers from public buildings by<br />
of<br />
the incorporation of appropriate legal stan-<br />
requiring<br />
dards into state and local building codes,-<br />
the Commission encourage local committees throughout<br />
That<br />
State of Washington. to learn what barriers to the<br />
the<br />
of the handicapped can beremoved at reasonable<br />
employment<br />
in the design and construction of new buildings and<br />
cost<br />
facilities, both private and public; to "watch dog"<br />
public<br />
enforcement of Chapter 35; to require the removal of<br />
the<br />
barriers wherever feasible in remodeling<br />
architectural<br />
public buildings.<br />
existing<br />
the Commission report urge every school giving a<br />
That<br />
in architecture and building design to include in<br />
course<br />
curriculum a chapter on elimination of barriers (i)<br />
the<br />
employment of the handicapped, and (2) to the use of<br />
to<br />
public buildings by the blind, aged, and disabled;<br />
all<br />
licensing examinations for architects include sections<br />
that<br />
requiring knowledge of this curriculum.<br />
the 1968 report of the National Commission on Archi-<br />
That<br />
Barriers to Rehabilitation of the Handicapped be<br />
tectural<br />
available to Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
made<br />
and that they cooperate in efforts to make build-<br />
employees<br />
and facilities accessible to all disabled persons;<br />
ings<br />
that Division of Vocational Rehabilitation make<br />
further,<br />
report available to appropriately interested agencies<br />
this<br />
persons.<br />
and<br />
226
Transportation<br />
Buell presented info rmation indicating the con¢ern of<br />
Mr.<br />
Indoor Sports Club loclly and nationally, in the<br />
the<br />
of barriers to free movement of wheel chair<br />
elimination<br />
persons. He mentioned particularly turnstiles in<br />
limited<br />
centers and basement and mezzanine restrooms in bus<br />
shopping<br />
railroad depots which are very difficult for wheel chair<br />
and<br />
His organizationhas been in touch with the<br />
travelers.<br />
Institute of Architecture and Park and Recreation<br />
American<br />
about making all facili.ties available to the handi-<br />
Boards<br />
capped.<br />
(End of excerpt from task force report)<br />
a result of the recommendations of a number of task<br />
As<br />
the Planning Commission on January 25, 1969 voted to have a<br />
forces,<br />
to Congress, concerning the transportation of handicapped<br />
Memorial<br />
in the United States. This Memorial, introduced by the Honor-<br />
people<br />
John Merrill in the House of Representatives, became House Joint<br />
able<br />
No. 9. The Memorial is quoted in full, as follows:<br />
Memorial<br />
Many physically handicapped Americans--two hundred<br />
WHEREAS,<br />
thousand in wheelchairs; two hundred thousand with<br />
fifty<br />
leg braces; one hundred forty thousand with artificial<br />
heavy<br />
and five million with heart conditions--are attempt-<br />
limbs;<br />
ing to maintain their self-respect through employment; and<br />
Many of them need to use public transportation<br />
WHEREAS,<br />
and<br />
facilities;<br />
These handicapped and others who are blind or aged<br />
WHEREAS,<br />
that flights of stairs, curbs, revolving doors, out-of-<br />
find<br />
drinking fountains and telephones, narrow doorways,<br />
reach<br />
restroom facilities, high steps on buses and<br />
inadequate<br />
and other similar restrictions, tend to deny them<br />
trains,<br />
access to transportation facilities and to buildings<br />
free<br />
which they might pursue valuable business, educational,<br />
in<br />
and recreational objectives; and<br />
social<br />
Architectural and transportation facilities.designed<br />
WHEREAS,<br />
serve the handicapped also serve the able-bodied; and<br />
to<br />
the Governor's Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
WHEREAS,<br />
of the State of Washington, following study<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
existing conditions, finds that unnecessary architectural<br />
of<br />
transportation barriers are impeding the handicapped in<br />
and<br />
their potential as creative and productive individ-<br />
realizing<br />
in our society;<br />
uals<br />
227
THEREOSE, your Memorialists respectfully pray that<br />
NOW,<br />
Congress enact legislation expanding assistance to<br />
the<br />
solve th transportation needs of handicapped people.<br />
IT RESOLVED, That copies of this memprial be immediately<br />
BE<br />
to the HonorableRichard M. Nixon, President<br />
transmitted<br />
the United States, the President of the United States<br />
of<br />
the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and<br />
Senate,<br />
each member of Congress from the State of Washington.<br />
Registry for the Blind<br />
has been proposed that the blind in Washington State be<br />
It<br />
so that they might know of governmental services to help<br />
registered,<br />
them.<br />
few people, even professional people, know the services<br />
So<br />
to them through state and private sources.<br />
available<br />
young married people have defectivechildren because<br />
Many<br />
mother has a viral disease in the first trimester of the pregnancy.<br />
the<br />
this happens some of them flee like wounded animals, and hide the<br />
When<br />
in some back room. Their anguish immobilizes them. They feel<br />
child<br />
ashamed. The handicapped child languishes.<br />
such parents, of course, facethe problem and seek<br />
Other<br />
and therapeutic assistance. Their children, even with a<br />
diagnostic<br />
have a chance to grow to be self-supporting, happy, self-<br />
defect,<br />
adults.<br />
respecting<br />
importance of S.B..472 is that the blind children and<br />
The<br />
who are catastrophically disabled will be identified. A coun-<br />
those<br />
skilled in working with the blind can offer help to the parents<br />
selor,<br />
these children. When the cause of the blindness is explained, the<br />
of<br />
will have their guilt feelings assuaged. Constructive activ-<br />
parents<br />
can be offered the parents. Optimism can come again,<br />
ities<br />
numbers involved under this bill are not large. Only<br />
The<br />
6,000 blind are in the state. Most of these about already known<br />
are<br />
the Services for the Blind of Public Assistance. Support for this<br />
to<br />
comes because it is probable that more blind infants and children<br />
bill<br />
be reported to rehabilitation services for the blind. If they<br />
will<br />
be helped early, in their first few years, they can become healthy,<br />
can<br />
responsible people.<br />
bill passed the Senate in 1969 but died in the House of<br />
The<br />
The bill as it passed the Senate is as follows;<br />
Representatives.<br />
228
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO. 472<br />
of Washington By Senators Ridder, Holman,<br />
State<br />
Regular Session Grelve and Marquardt<br />
41st<br />
first time February'lT, 1969 and referred to Committee on MEDI-<br />
Read<br />
DENTISTRY, PUBLIC HEALTH, AIRANDJWATER POLLUTION.<br />
CINE,<br />
AN ACT Relating to blind persons; establishing a register of blind<br />
persons in the state of Washington to provide for the manda-<br />
tory reporting of information concerning such persons; and<br />
adding new sections to chapter 26, Laws of 1959 and to chap-<br />
ter 74.16 RCW.<br />
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:<br />
NEW SECTION. Section i. There is added to chapter 26, Laws<br />
of 1959 and to chapter 74.16 RCW a new section to read as follows:<br />
The director of the department of public assistance shall es-.<br />
tablish and maintain a register of blind persons residing in the<br />
state of Washington. Such register, shall, under regulations pre-<br />
scribed by the director of the department of public assistance, pro-<br />
vide information of such nature as will or may be of assistance in<br />
the planning of improved facillties and services fo{ blind persons<br />
and in the restoration and conservation of sight.<br />
NEW SECTION, Sec. 2. There is added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />
1959 and .to chapter 74.16 RCW a new section to read as follows:<br />
Each<br />
(i) health, educational, and social service agency or instltu-<br />
tion operating in the state of Washington and having in its care or<br />
custody, either full or part time, or rendering service to, any blind<br />
person;<br />
(2) physician or osteopath licensed or registered by the<br />
state of Washington who has in his rofessional care for diagnosisor<br />
treatment such a person; and<br />
optometrist licensed by the state of Washington who,'<br />
(3)<br />
course of his practice of optometry, ascertains that a person the i<br />
22-9<br />
ESB 472
7<br />
8<br />
10<br />
II<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
3O<br />
31<br />
32<br />
blind; shall report in writing to the director of the department of<br />
publlc assistance, the name, age, and residence o£ such person and.<br />
such addltionalinformation pertaining to blindness-as the .director<br />
may, by regulation, require for incorporation In the register re-<br />
ferred to in section 1 Of this act.<br />
NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. There is added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />
1%59 andto chapter 74.16 RCW a new section to read as follows:<br />
The register of blind persons and report submitted pursuant<br />
to section 2 of this act shall not be open to public inspection. The<br />
director may make available in the form ofstatlstlcal abstracts or<br />
information contained in such register and reports if the<br />
digests<br />
of persons referred to in such'register or report is not<br />
identity<br />
disclosed in such abstracts or digests.<br />
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. There is• added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />
1959 and to chapter 4.16 RCW a new section to read as .follows:<br />
For the purposes of •this act the term "blind person" means,<br />
and the term "blind" refers to, a person who (a} is totally blind,<br />
(b} has impaired vision of not more than 20/200 visual acuity in the<br />
better eye and for whom vision cannot be improved to better than.<br />
20/200, or (c} who has loss of vision due wholly orin.part to im-<br />
palrment of fleld vision or to other factors which affect the useful-<br />
ness of vision to a llke degree.<br />
SECTION. Sec. 5. There is added to chapter 26, Laws of<br />
NW<br />
and to chapter 74.16 RCW a new sectlon to read•as follows:<br />
1959<br />
Any person who in good faith makes a report pursuant to this<br />
act or pursuant to any regulationpromulgated under the authority<br />
of this act,sha11 not, by reason thereof, be personally liable in<br />
damages.<br />
ESB 472<br />
230
National Re.ha.ilitation Asoiation<br />
Ntiona! Rehabilitation Association has a 43-year<br />
TNe<br />
of service to the handicapped and those who serve them. The<br />
history<br />
voluntary rehabilitation organization in the country, it has<br />
oldest<br />
a leader in the development of the concept of rehabilitation and<br />
been<br />
promoting voluntary and public programs to rehabilitate the handi-<br />
in<br />
The Journalof. Rehabilitation contains many helpful articles.<br />
capped.<br />
for this organization has been weak on the West<br />
Support<br />
and in mountain states. The state vocational rehabilitation<br />
Coast<br />
which are recognized as most productive are in the South and<br />
programs<br />
the East Coast. These states support the NRA best of all. The<br />
on<br />
Northwest is last in the nation in such support. Greater<br />
Pacific<br />
in the work of the National Rehabilitation Association<br />
participation<br />
the part of professional staff members of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
on<br />
have a mutually helpful effect.<br />
would<br />
Job Development and Placement<br />
Nation's Manpower Programs," a position paper by the<br />
"The<br />
Manpower Policy Task Force, dated January 7,1969, has been<br />
National<br />
by the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
considered<br />
position paper describes a number of the efforts of the United<br />
This<br />
Government in terms of their impact on manpower. It is assumed<br />
States<br />
vocational rehabilitation services have a strong manpower compo<br />
that<br />
nent.<br />
copy of the Donald Dabelstein Memorial Lecture presented<br />
A<br />
October 1968, at the National Rehabilitation Association meeting<br />
in<br />
NewOrleans by Paul M. Ellwood, Jr., M.D., entitled Manpower<br />
in<br />
as a Public Market was considered by the Planning<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
at a meeting in December 1968. This description of voca<br />
Commission<br />
services as being in the manpower field has<br />
tionalrehabilitation<br />
the stand taken by the Commission concerning the Executive<br />
influenced<br />
of the State Government.<br />
Reorganization<br />
has been proposed that the State of Washington have an<br />
It<br />
called the State Department of Manpower and Industry, composed<br />
agency<br />
the present Departments of Employment Security, Labor &nd Industry,<br />
of<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation. This suggestion was made by a non-<br />
and<br />
group considering all aspects of executive reorganization<br />
partisan<br />
state government. The committee was headed by Dean Brewster C.<br />
of<br />
of the Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Washing-<br />
Denny<br />
Seattle. The bill to create the Department of Manpower and Ind<br />
ton,<br />
was sent by executive request to the Legislature. At the<br />
Industry<br />
of this writing it has passed the House of.Representatives and<br />
time<br />
being considered by the Senate, with vocational rehabilitation<br />
is<br />
deleted from the bill and only the Employment Security Depart-<br />
services<br />
ment and Labor and Industry to be joined.<br />
231
following quotations from TASK FORCE ON EXECUTIVE<br />
The<br />
by Dean Brewster C. Denny, are presented:<br />
ORGANIZATION<br />
government today faces a crisis. Every year, the<br />
State<br />
played by government in our lives becomes more impor-<br />
role<br />
Relations between the. chief executive and those who<br />
tant.<br />
with him continually growmore complex. An expanding<br />
work<br />
bureaucracy increasingly impinges on areas once<br />
federal<br />
the primary responsibility of the state. Govern-<br />
thought<br />
machinery that functioned well enough in a simpler<br />
mental<br />
is no more adequate to cope with today's complex<br />
time<br />
problems than is an abacusin the age of the computer.<br />
Task Force has sought in its study of the structure<br />
This<br />
state government to identify specific problems impeding<br />
of<br />
capacity of the executive.branch of state government<br />
the<br />
meet its expanding and changing responsibilities and to<br />
to<br />
solutions which can be promptly implemented. At<br />
propose<br />
same time we have attempted to design a strategy by<br />
the<br />
the organizational structure of state government can<br />
which<br />
to be improved in order to keep our government<br />
continue<br />
to the changing needs of the people of the State<br />
responsive<br />
Washington.<br />
of<br />
have approached our task at a time when the role of<br />
We<br />
government is undergoing extensive change. At least<br />
state<br />
major factors are compelling that change. First,<br />
three<br />
state is experiencing an unparalleled explosion and<br />
the<br />
of its population accompanied by rapidly<br />
concentration<br />
service demands which often make today's plans<br />
increasing<br />
tomorrow. Second, a major change in the quality<br />
obsolete<br />
the character of service demands upon the state is<br />
and<br />
And third, a revolutionary and still changing<br />
occurring.<br />
in intergovernmental relations between federal, state<br />
role<br />
and local government is taking place.<br />
one at this time can predict with precision what role<br />
No<br />
will ultimately play in the complex, evolving<br />
government<br />
intergovernmental relations now developing.<br />
patternsPof<br />
it is evident that if state government is to<br />
Nevertheless,<br />
as a vital and significant force in society it can<br />
survive<br />
longer retain the rather static and fixed character<br />
no<br />
it has traditionally projected. Change has become<br />
that<br />
order of the day and state government must become an<br />
the<br />
for change flexible, innovative and capable<br />
instrument<br />
anticipating and responding to the needs and problems<br />
of<br />
of the people.<br />
state government has played a major and often<br />
Traditionally<br />
role in the delivery of a large variety of services<br />
dominant<br />
within its borders. Despite the expansion of federal programs<br />
232
the demands of local goyerrm.ent o.geter authority<br />
and<br />
ust be assued tt stake government will continue to<br />
$.t<br />
a major source of services-and a major factor in the<br />
Be<br />
and the coordination of such new-programs as may<br />
planning<br />
evolve so long as it is able to perform effectively.<br />
roadblocks to effective management of the state's<br />
The<br />
are many. At the heart of these is the simple<br />
business<br />
that the Governor is not the boss. While most of the<br />
fact<br />
of this state think of the Governor as chief<br />
residents<br />
of all the agencies of state government and hold<br />
executive<br />
responsible for their effective administration, in fact<br />
him<br />
is in no real sense the chief executive of approximately<br />
he<br />
of the executive functions of state government.<br />
one-half<br />
other areas, although he has some executive responsibili<br />
In<br />
he does not have the authority and administrative tools<br />
ties,<br />
associated with the chief executive of a major<br />
traditionally<br />
or the chief executive of the United States<br />
corporation<br />
whose office the office of Governor most closely<br />
Government,<br />
parallels,<br />
authority is divided among eight other independently<br />
Executive<br />
officials over whom the Governor has no control. The<br />
elected<br />
is effectively insulated from having anappropriate<br />
Governor<br />
voice in a number of vital areas of state government<br />
policy<br />
which transportationis one major.example. He has little<br />
of<br />
say about recruitment, development and assignment of the<br />
to<br />
executives of state government. He lacks effective<br />
key<br />
over the administrative operations of the state's<br />
influence<br />
functions. At the present time 28 major depart-<br />
personnel<br />
and agencies report either directly to the Governor<br />
ments<br />
through commissions. In addition, in excess of 60 other<br />
or<br />
and commissions function within state government.<br />
boards<br />
of these manage line operations and many of them have<br />
Some<br />
policy-making functions.. While the Governor<br />
significant<br />
many of these commissioners and board members and<br />
appoints,<br />
expect to have access to him when they want it, he often<br />
they<br />
relatively little influence over their actions.<br />
has<br />
these kinds of limitations, responsive and responsible<br />
With<br />
is made exceedingly difficult. With the rapid<br />
government<br />
of events and the ever accelerating rate of change within<br />
pace<br />
America, we no longer have the luxury of time<br />
contemporary<br />
once may have been the case. The need for coherent<br />
which<br />
efficient administration and a greatly improved<br />
planning,<br />
system for the delivery of services is clearly evident.<br />
Task Force has considered the goals of our organiza-<br />
This<br />
studies to be:<br />
tional<br />
233
i. To make state government more responsive to the people.<br />
To create the too].s whereby the state's business may<br />
2.<br />
managed and necessary services delivered economically,<br />
be<br />
efficiently and effectively.<br />
To allow the policies of the Governor and the legis-<br />
3.<br />
to be executed more directly and more expeditiously.<br />
lature<br />
To secure able leadership in key state offices and to<br />
4.<br />
competent performance at all levels of state<br />
encourage<br />
government.<br />
To maximize the capacity of state government to make a<br />
5.<br />
contribution to the beneficial development of<br />
creative<br />
citizens and to the preservation and improvement of<br />
its<br />
quality of their environment.<br />
the<br />
seeking to attain these broad goals we have focused on<br />
In<br />
issues as the authority of the Governor to appoint the<br />
such<br />
managers andpolicy makers within state govern<br />
principal<br />
the alignment of like functions within the same depart-<br />
ment,<br />
provision for adequate manpower ments, andthe of<br />
reduction<br />
number of persons reporting directly to the Governor.<br />
the<br />
adopted, our proposals would consolidate seven entities<br />
If<br />
the human resources sphere of state government into two;<br />
in<br />
in the transportation sphere into one; three having<br />
seven<br />
control functions into one; three agencies within<br />
pollution<br />
Governor's Office into one, plus a new line agency;<br />
the<br />
would merge two separate personnel structures.<br />
and<br />
recommend the consolidation of the functions of the Depart<br />
We<br />
of Employment Security,.the Department of Labor and<br />
ment<br />
and the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of<br />
Industries<br />
Coordinating Council on Occupational Education into a<br />
the<br />
Department ofManpower and Industry.<br />
mission of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation,<br />
The<br />
also receives much of its funding from the federal<br />
which<br />
was originally oriented towards the rehabilitat-<br />
government<br />
of persons with physical handicaps. Over a period of<br />
ing<br />
the rehabilitation eligibility standards have been<br />
years<br />
so that now the rehabilitation program can be<br />
broadened<br />
as a highly flexible tool in the attack upon the pro-<br />
used<br />
of the hard core unemployed, law offenders and the<br />
blems<br />
physically or<br />
socially disabled.<br />
can be argued with some justification that the Vocational<br />
It<br />
program should be placed within the Depart-<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
of Social and Health Services. Our rationale for<br />
ment<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation in the Department of<br />
including<br />
234
and Industry is that rehabilitation is a "man-<br />
Manpower<br />
function in that its goal is to restore people to<br />
power"<br />
roles in society. Actually, Vocational Rehabili-<br />
productive<br />
stands somewhat in the center between a health<br />
tation<br />
and a manpower service. Its treatment methods are<br />
welfare<br />
allied with the health and social work fields, its<br />
closely<br />
result with employment. Therefore, it could probably<br />
end<br />
with equal but different logic to either the Department<br />
go<br />
Social and Health Services or to the Department of<br />
of<br />
and Industry. Federal approval will be required<br />
Manpower<br />
the consolidation being proposed here, but preliminary<br />
for<br />
indicates that suchapproval can be obtained.<br />
inquiry<br />
is apparent that a close working relationship will be<br />
It<br />
between the proposed Department of Social and Health<br />
required<br />
and the Department of Manpower and Industry. At<br />
Services<br />
community level integrated field service operations<br />
the<br />
the two departments should be encouraged. Often<br />
between<br />
will be essential. By reducing six agencies to two,<br />
this<br />
community-level coordination as well as communi.<br />
effective<br />
in Olympia between the departments and with the<br />
cations<br />
Governor should be significantly enhanced.<br />
should be emphasized that in recommending a Department<br />
It<br />
Manpower and Industry and a Department of Social and<br />
of<br />
Services, we havein mind changes far more signifi-<br />
Health<br />
than merelyshifting boxes into new diagrammatic<br />
cant<br />
These changes are only a means for creating<br />
relationships.<br />
greatly improved system for the delivery and deployment<br />
a<br />
state services that will maximize the development and<br />
of<br />
of our state's human resources. This, of course, will<br />
use<br />
time, but by promptly implementing our recommended<br />
take<br />
the conservation of the human resources in our<br />
changes,<br />
communities can be more effectively pursued now.<br />
235
CHAPTER Vl<br />
THE COMPOSITE WORKING PLAN<br />
FOR SERVICES TO THE HANDICAPPED AND DISADVANTAGED<br />
responsibility of the Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
A<br />
was to devise a plan to serve all the handicapped and<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
in Washington State with vocational rehabilitation ser-<br />
disadvantaged<br />
by 1975. It would seem easy enough to devise such a plan if<br />
vices<br />
money could be spent for enough staff members to do the job.<br />
enough<br />
plan to rehabilitate the handicapped and disadvantaged was to<br />
This<br />
that adequate appropriations would be made. Money was to be<br />
assume<br />
object. However, federal funding subsequent to the initiation f<br />
no<br />
planning project has increased only gradually. An evolutionary<br />
the<br />
in rehabilitation services becomes possible under this funding,<br />
growth<br />
it would seem a re___volutionary increase in services is needed.<br />
but<br />
needs to be a quantum jump in rehabilitation funding annually<br />
There<br />
1975 if a substantial number of the handicapped and disadvantaged<br />
to<br />
to be provided rehabilitation services. The nation's preoccu-<br />
are<br />
with an Asiatic war precludes attention to this worthy domestic<br />
pation<br />
issue.<br />
The Size of the Problem<br />
to the study was a determination of the number of<br />
Basic<br />
people living in the statewho might profitably receive<br />
handicapped<br />
rehabilitation services. Figures on the incidence and<br />
vocational<br />
ofhandicapping conditions are given in some detail in<br />
prevalence<br />
present report, REHABILITATION ADVANCE PLANNING TO SERVE THE<br />
the<br />
AND DISADVANTAGED. The planned distribution for the<br />
HANDICAPPED<br />
will place it in major libraries of the state where it will<br />
report<br />
as a reference source for those interested in the study.<br />
serve<br />
crucial figure, the number of new clients expected<br />
The<br />
be eligible, feasible and interested in vocational rehabilitation<br />
to<br />
each year, is 37,500. One third of these, or 12,500, are<br />
services,<br />
disabled people whose disability is a crippling condition,<br />
physically<br />
blindness, cerebral palsy, deafness, or amputation, or a disease<br />
or<br />
as heart condition, epilepsy, diabetes, or arthritis.<br />
such<br />
237
addition to physically disabled people it is expected<br />
In<br />
25,000 mentally ill, alcoholics,mental retardates, public<br />
that<br />
and socially disadvantaged individuals might be referred<br />
offenders<br />
for vocational rehabilJ.tation services.<br />
annually<br />
of the first tasks of the staff of the Planning Commission<br />
One<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation was to determine th number of handicapped<br />
for<br />
disadvantaged people in the State of Washington. One of the first<br />
and<br />
that was done was to contact state agencies in order to find the<br />
things<br />
of duplicated and unduplicated people served by the Division of<br />
number<br />
Rehabilitation and other state agencies.<br />
Vocational<br />
trying to determine precisely how many individuals known<br />
In<br />
Rehabilitation were also known to Public Assistance, Special Educa-<br />
to<br />
Department of Institutions, Employment Security Department, and<br />
tion,<br />
Board of Prison Terms and Paroles, the State Department of Health,<br />
the<br />
State Office of Economic Opportunity, the State Veterans Rehabili-<br />
the<br />
Council and the like, we were frustrated. This frustration was<br />
tation<br />
because of lack of cooperation, butbecause of the various ways<br />
not<br />
are kept for the several agencies. Some of these state agencies<br />
records<br />
record, and some do not record, the social security number, the date<br />
do<br />
birth, disability, if any, and the like. Some filing is done by<br />
of<br />
district, or county, or other region rather than for the state<br />
school<br />
a whole.<br />
as<br />
is evident that a new system of case identification is<br />
It<br />
by state agencies. This new system should be one that most<br />
needed<br />
agencies could use, would be inexpensive, would be one that would<br />
state<br />
confidentiality, and would be one that could be used at the<br />
preserve<br />
centers now. There continues to be discussions by state<br />
multi-service<br />
about data processing andconfidentiality.<br />
officials<br />
a data bank had information about handicapped people which<br />
If<br />
be derived from a number Of different sources, then services to<br />
would<br />
handicapped could be planned more skillfully. It is expected that<br />
the<br />
rehabilitation services can be provided at less cost if the<br />
better<br />
numbersof the handicapped weremore accurately known.<br />
THE COW,MISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
a single system of case identification be used by all the<br />
That<br />
helping agencies.<br />
state
Financin$<br />
37,500<br />
feasible and interested potential new clients<br />
Eligible,<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation in the year 1975<br />
12,500<br />
disabled<br />
Physically<br />
people<br />
of total clients<br />
1/3<br />
25,000<br />
ill, alcoholics, mental<br />
Mentally<br />
public offenders,<br />
retardates,<br />
disadvantaged<br />
socially<br />
2/3 of total clients<br />
the service number determined, the Commission's role<br />
With<br />
one of recommending changes that would improve and expand the<br />
became<br />
services and establish new ones. An immediately apparent<br />
existing<br />
is a substantial increase in funding to reach the very large num-<br />
need<br />
of persons in need but not presently served. Total appropriations,<br />
ber<br />
and state, in 1975, would have to be increased about nine times<br />
federal<br />
the money appropriated per year for the 1969-1971 biennium. Appro-<br />
over<br />
of the magnitude of $i00 million to $120 million per year<br />
priations<br />
be required if Vocational Rehabilitation serves the estimated<br />
will<br />
eligible, feasible and interested potential new clients of<br />
37,500<br />
Rehabilitation in Washington State in 1975. And even this<br />
Vocational<br />
might prove inadequate in supplying the large number of handi-<br />
figure<br />
in Washington State with the skilled services needed to make<br />
capped<br />
employable.<br />
them<br />
in dollars from the federal government to the State of<br />
Aid<br />
vocational rehabilitation program is assumed to be unlimited,<br />
Washington's<br />
insofar as the planning project specifications are concerned,<br />
years gone by the federal share of Section 2 funds seemed<br />
In<br />
as the State of Washington reverted an average of $1.3 million<br />
ample,<br />
for the five fiscal years ending in 1967, due to lack of state<br />
annually<br />
funds or third party matching contracts.<br />
appropriated<br />
present situation seems different. Federal funds assigned<br />
The<br />
vocational rehabilitation are far from adequate. The 1968 Voca-<br />
to<br />
Rehabilitation Act Amendments changed the matching formula for<br />
tional<br />
of these funds from 75 percent federal, 25 percent state and local,<br />
most<br />
80 percent federal, 20 percent state and local. It would seem that<br />
to<br />
greater amounts would be assigned for the handicapped and disad-.<br />
much<br />
in Washington State. However, the increase from 3/4 to 4/5<br />
vantaged<br />
share was not funded in President Johnson's budget for fiscal<br />
federal<br />
70.and President Nixon further reduced the national appropriation<br />
year<br />
for this period from $524 to $471 million.<br />
request<br />
"239
pays as well as costs. For the individual<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
is unemployed because of a disability the program may provide<br />
who<br />
which make him self-supporting. The state and local taxes<br />
services<br />
by the rehabilitated person are soon equivalent to the entire<br />
paid<br />
amount spent upon him.<br />
state has a special obligation to try to rehabilitate<br />
The<br />
who are dependent upon it and/or one of its political subdivisions.<br />
those<br />
individual receiving public assistance, or Social Security disabil-<br />
-The<br />
payments, or aid to the needy blind, or services from the Depart-<br />
ity<br />
of Institutions consumes many thousands of dollars of governmental<br />
ment<br />
over the course of several years. It makes good sense to provide<br />
money<br />
a one-time expenditure to rehabilitate such a person into self-support.<br />
services can remove disabled public assistance<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
from welfare rolls. Even if conservative estimates of costs<br />
clients<br />
benefits are made, this is still a sound social investment. Both<br />
and<br />
and welfare recipients would benefit from a greatly expanded<br />
taxpayers<br />
rehabilitation program for this group.<br />
clients need more and better evaluative services than<br />
Welfare<br />
have received in the past. In particular, more counselor inter-<br />
they<br />
with client, family, and employer are needed to "see" the client<br />
views<br />
his total environment; and more medical, psychological, and other<br />
in<br />
to assess his overall status. This may be the key to rehab-<br />
procedures<br />
greater numbers Of these clients, for accurate diagnosis is<br />
ilitating<br />
both in selecting those who can profit from services and in<br />
essential<br />
the services each client needs to become self-sustaining.<br />
choosing<br />
coordination of services and strong emphasis on pre-<br />
Proper<br />
as many clients as possible to become self-sustaining are very<br />
paring<br />
important.<br />
services for younger clients give a higher return than<br />
While<br />
older ones, all age groups up to 55-60 can be served with assurance<br />
for<br />
those rehabilitated will return social benefits at least several<br />
that<br />
the cost.<br />
times<br />
rather than supportive services give the greatest<br />
Corrective<br />
returns and should be emphasized, along with training<br />
cost-benefit<br />
designed to remedy deficiencies uncovered by evaluation.<br />
Planning Commission believes that for better planning,<br />
The<br />
information about the number of disabled persons in the state<br />
better<br />
is essential.<br />
THE COISSION RECOENDS:<br />
the Department of. Planning and Community Affairs. (or its<br />
That<br />
agency) in cooperation with the Division of Vocational<br />
successor<br />
240.
the Departments of Health, Institutions, Public<br />
Rehabilitation,<br />
and Employment Security, and the Regional Medical<br />
Assistance<br />
Program:<br />
expand studies to identify the handicapped in<br />
I.<br />
state;<br />
the<br />
study private and voluntary organizations as<br />
2.<br />
as state organizations which provide services<br />
well<br />
to these handicapped;<br />
determine the number of disabled who seek services<br />
3.<br />
are rejected for these services; and<br />
who<br />
reconend the allocation of staff to serve fully<br />
4.<br />
disabled people.<br />
all<br />
AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
expenditures, both federal and state, be increased so<br />
That<br />
rehabilitation services may take a .significant step<br />
that<br />
meeting the needs of increased numbers of disabled<br />
toward<br />
disadvantaged people.<br />
and<br />
has been hampered both by lack of funds and an<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
to spend all the federal and state funds appropriated to<br />
inability<br />
the handicapped in Washington State. An average of $1.3 million<br />
serve<br />
year reverted to the federal government unspent in the five years<br />
per<br />
ending in fiscal 1967.<br />
handicapped people are served in the state, per i00,000<br />
Fewer<br />
than in the rest of the United States. The chart below<br />
population<br />
Washington ranked as the 49th state last year in the number of<br />
shows<br />
rehabilitated per i00,000 population. An effort must be made<br />
persons<br />
increase the rehab±litants here. The f±scal year 1969 rehabilita-<br />
to<br />
figures for Washington State are fortunately much improved over<br />
tion<br />
recent years' figures.<br />
U, S, Tot&/<br />
of persons rehabilitated per 100,000 population, by reii0n and state; and rank<br />
Number<br />
state, 196h-1968<br />
by<br />
RehabtlitaCed per 100,000<br />
Reston<br />
pOl,Ulationl/<br />
and<br />
Scats 1968 1967 966 1965<br />
Washiuton 57 57 44 42<br />
year. Bureau of the Census Series P-25.<br />
241<br />
Rank<br />
36 49 41 48 44 46
States<br />
Rank<br />
by<br />
4.44<br />
Guam<br />
Arkansas 4.31<br />
2<br />
West Virginia 4.02<br />
3<br />
South Carolina 3.94<br />
4<br />
5 Georgia 3.66<br />
Alabama 3.60<br />
6<br />
Vermont 3.05<br />
7<br />
Wyoming 2.82<br />
8<br />
Oklahoma 2.80<br />
9<br />
i0 Wisconsin 2.54<br />
Colerado 2.52<br />
II<br />
Mississippi 2.50<br />
12<br />
Rhode Island 2.47<br />
13<br />
North Carolina 2.47<br />
14<br />
15 Utah 2.43<br />
Pennsylvania 2.38<br />
16<br />
Arizona 2.32<br />
17<br />
Florida 2.31<br />
18<br />
Louisiana 2.28<br />
19<br />
20 Minnesota 2.24<br />
2.07<br />
21,Virginia<br />
Maryland 2.07<br />
22<br />
Iowa 2.05<br />
23<br />
Hawaii 2.02<br />
24<br />
25 South Dakota 2.00<br />
Alaska 1.94<br />
26<br />
Tennessee 1.92<br />
27<br />
Virgin Islands 1.91<br />
28<br />
Missouri 1.91<br />
29<br />
30 Washington 1.80<br />
District of Columbia 1.77<br />
31<br />
Delaware 1.77<br />
32<br />
Oregon 1.75<br />
33<br />
Nebraska 1.75<br />
34<br />
35 Puerto Rico 1.72<br />
Texas 1.72<br />
36<br />
Montana 1.71<br />
37<br />
North Dakota 1.70<br />
38<br />
Kentucky 1.69<br />
39<br />
40 Illinois 1.53<br />
Nevada 1.53<br />
41<br />
California 1.50<br />
42<br />
Massachusetts 1.48<br />
43<br />
New York 1.42<br />
44<br />
45 Michigan 1.41<br />
New Jersey 1.36<br />
46<br />
Idaho 1.34<br />
47<br />
1.24<br />
48Maine<br />
Connecticut 1.19<br />
49<br />
50 New Mexico 1.16<br />
Ohio 1.02<br />
51<br />
New Hampshire .97<br />
52<br />
Kansas .94<br />
53<br />
Indiana .65<br />
54<br />
Capita Expenditures for Vocational Rehabilitation in 1968<br />
Per<br />
and State Funds)<br />
(Federal<br />
(Amount in Dollars)<br />
0 60 1.20 1.80 2.40 3.00 3.60 4.20 4;80<br />
1.88<br />
National<br />
Averag.e3<br />
S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Rehabilitation<br />
U.<br />
Administration. STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY<br />
Services<br />
DATA FISCAL YEAR 1968. p. 24.<br />
PROGRAM<br />
241(a)
cost per case in Washington State and in the national<br />
The<br />
rehabilitation program as a whole has been increasing<br />
vocational<br />
faster than the inflation. Vocational rehabilitation services,<br />
even<br />
costs, have been rising far faster in recent years than the<br />
hospital<br />
of most other items. It is not realistic to expect to reverse<br />
cost<br />
trend; it is practical to expect to slow it. Specialization is<br />
this<br />
way to decrease the cost per case. The use o case aides and<br />
one<br />
personnel in rehabilitation discussed in a previous section,<br />
clerical<br />
is another.<br />
WASHINGTON DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL RENABILITATION PROGRAM<br />
CASES CLOSED REHABILITATED: 1963 1968<br />
Year Appropriation Number / Average Cost Per Rehab 2/<br />
Fiscal<br />
Jne 30 Expended Rehab'd State U.S. Average<br />
Ending<br />
$ $<br />
$<br />
1,935,337 1503 1,287 996<br />
1963<br />
1964 2,082.984 1355 1,537 1,113<br />
1965 2,312,808 1478 1,565 1,143<br />
1966 3,164,136 1564 2.023 1,385<br />
1967 4,320,436 1957 2'208 1,750<br />
1968 5,630,353 1855 3,035 1,816<br />
for the number rehabilitated are from Annual Reports of the<br />
Figures<br />
They differ from figures in Federal reports because they<br />
Division.<br />
cases rehabilitated by state funds and therefore not reported<br />
include<br />
the Federal matching program.<br />
in<br />
Section 2 funds only.<br />
Personnel to do the Job<br />
clientele of Vocational Rehabilitation are the catastro.<br />
The<br />
physically disabled, the mentally and emotionally handicapped,<br />
phically<br />
the socioculturally deprived. Whatkind of staff member-is able<br />
and<br />
help these people to productive worthwhile lives? These agents of<br />
to<br />
who are most effective in their jobs are described as having<br />
change<br />
warmth, and genuineness. They are not necessarily those who<br />
empathy,<br />
advanced academic training, and who relate well to authority<br />
have<br />
Some changes in personnel practices may need revision.<br />
figures.<br />
242
expanding program will need additional staff. Will the<br />
An<br />
be able to meet the strong competition for qualified personnel?<br />
program<br />
Could present staff be used to better advantage?<br />
recruitment practices are needed. Staff development<br />
Vigorous<br />
for all levels of personnel, education lave, released time<br />
programs<br />
for professional growth help to hold employees after recruitment.<br />
Training Programs<br />
and information programs for present and potential<br />
Training<br />
of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation were the subject<br />
employees<br />
a number of recommendations by the Planning Commission. Also in-<br />
of<br />
was a recommendation that employees with related and similar<br />
cluded<br />
in other state departments be part of this training.<br />
responsibilities<br />
were made for the following training programs.<br />
Recommendations<br />
For presentemp!oyees. The Commission recommended<br />
(i)<br />
continuation of present orientation and in-<br />
the<br />
training programs and the initiation of new<br />
service<br />
for the Division's field rehabilitation coun-<br />
ones<br />
to keep them informed through demonstration<br />
selors<br />
and visits to facilities within the state<br />
seminars<br />
the problems faced by clients with heartdisease,<br />
of<br />
stroke and other severely disabling conditions.<br />
cancer,<br />
Commission also recommended that greater efforts<br />
The<br />
made to recruit staff members who have received<br />
be<br />
training in rehabilitation counseling. Present<br />
formal<br />
members, they proposed, should beoffered such<br />
staff<br />
training on a part-time basis or by correspondence.<br />
third recommendation in this category was that an<br />
A<br />
series of training programs be expanded and<br />
intensive<br />
financed for .personnel at all levels within<br />
adequately<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
the.<br />
For emplo ees in related service prosrams The Com-<br />
(2)<br />
recommended that joint training sessions, con-<br />
mission<br />
by the State Department of Personnel, be made<br />
ducted<br />
to state employees whose basic roles in the<br />
available<br />
professions are similar. Such trainingwould<br />
helping<br />
for, but not limited to, rehabilitation counselors,<br />
be<br />
security counselors, public assistance case-<br />
employment<br />
public health nurses, probation and parole<br />
workers,<br />
officers.<br />
For potentialemployees. The Commission recommended<br />
(3)<br />
information conferences and meetings be held for<br />
that<br />
high school and college students to introduce them to<br />
243
Sabbatical Leave<br />
and career opportunities available in voca-<br />
training<br />
rehabilitation,<br />
tional<br />
second recommendation was that undergraduate programs<br />
A<br />
vocational rehabilitation be instituted in our state<br />
in<br />
colleges and universities.<br />
third .recommendation in this field was that training<br />
A<br />
for non-college bound youth be established to<br />
programs<br />
them for para-professional positions in rehab-<br />
prepare<br />
ilitation.<br />
leaves are an accepted personnel practice in public<br />
Sabbatical<br />
private agencies and should be considered for the management per-<br />
and<br />
of the rehabilitation agency in Washington State. Those individ-<br />
sonnel<br />
who have been in the same job for six years should be offered an<br />
uals<br />
to trade positions temporarily for a three-month period<br />
opportunity<br />
longer with their colleagues in similar positions in other states.<br />
or<br />
staff members would, in effect, trade Jobs for a given period.<br />
These<br />
would both find the exchange renewing. On returning to their<br />
They<br />
posts, Washington Vocational Rehabilitation employees would<br />
regular<br />
back information about policies in other states which might be<br />
bring<br />
in this state. While away they would be able to offer infor-<br />
considered<br />
in the other state about commendable programs in this state.<br />
mation<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
sabbatical leaves for management personnel in vocational<br />
That<br />
be instituted.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
Manasement Stud<br />
consulting firm in Massachusetts has been employed to study<br />
A<br />
practices in rehabilitation agencies in many states. Such<br />
management<br />
study, never before done by an outside consulting firm, is timely<br />
a<br />
1969, since the State Director of Vocational Rehabilitation since<br />
in<br />
E. M. Oliver, has announced his retirement in the autumn of this<br />
1945,<br />
Harbridge House, Incorporated, of Boston, Massachusetts .is one<br />
year.<br />
such consulting firm. .<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
there be maintained a continuing evaluation of the manage-<br />
That<br />
practices of the vocational rehabilitation agency in<br />
ment<br />
State and that a nationally recognized consultig<br />
Washington<br />
be used for this purpose.<br />
firm<br />
244
Record Keeping<br />
in the record keeping practices for the Vocational<br />
Improvements<br />
program are needed. True, the rehabilitation agency<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
using computers a few years ago but much of the demographic<br />
started<br />
about client characteristics has not been available for study.<br />
data<br />
is recommended that factor analysis of client characteristics be<br />
It<br />
and that trends in client services be studied. The basic<br />
undertaken,<br />
from the R-300 reporting form on each client should be stored for<br />
data<br />
as needed in studies. Casework statistics are needed for<br />
retrieval<br />
program management. Present efforts of the agency to secure<br />
sound<br />
information for managerial purposes should be continued.<br />
statistical<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
increased efforts should also be made to computerize<br />
That<br />
data and develop informationretrieval processes.<br />
client<br />
Coordination and Cooperation Among Asencies Better Patterns of Service<br />
Government<br />
government, a first priority is the reorganization of<br />
In<br />
Rehabilitation services into the Department of Social and<br />
Vocational<br />
Services. Such reorganization it is believed would result in<br />
Health<br />
improved system of delivery of services to the disabled, one which<br />
an<br />
provide services at less cost than is possible under the present<br />
would<br />
structure.<br />
administrative<br />
secretary of the State Department of Social and Health<br />
The<br />
would be able to mandate to his subordinates that they coor-<br />
Services<br />
their efforts in a better way than has been possible heretofore.<br />
dinate<br />
example if a person in prison has family members receiving help<br />
For<br />
the Department of Public Assistance it is difficult for all pro-<br />
from<br />
workers touching the individual to be in communication with<br />
fessional<br />
other. The persons leaving prison may be assigned a parole officer<br />
each<br />
a vocational rehabilitation counselor. He is likely to find<br />
and<br />
to task force reports, that the interagency coordination<br />
according<br />
these departments leaves much to be desired. If the officer<br />
between<br />
the counselor were in the same agency their efforts in behalf of<br />
and<br />
parolee would certainly be more firmly joined.<br />
the<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation services be placed in the State<br />
That<br />
of Social and Health Services, or a similar agency<br />
Department<br />
which the Legislature would create.<br />
245
sharing of in-service training programs within the<br />
The<br />
department complex would achieve a goal which is the subject<br />
larger<br />
of the following recommendation,<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOENDS<br />
since the basic role of persons in some helping professions<br />
That<br />
similar, part of the training programs for new employees and<br />
is<br />
training programs for those in state employment should<br />
in-service<br />
together. Those training together would be rehabilitation<br />
be<br />
employment security counselors, public assistance<br />
counselors,<br />
probation and parole officers, public health nurses,<br />
caseworkers,<br />
the like. This part of the training could be done under the<br />
and<br />
Department of Personnel.<br />
State<br />
cooperation with the State Department of Institutions<br />
Close<br />
be required for the following recommendations adopted by the<br />
would<br />
Commission.<br />
THE COMMISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />
services to the hospitalized mentally ill should be so<br />
That<br />
that by 1975 all patients below the age of 60 would<br />
expanded<br />
referred to Vocational Rehabilitation routinely, with<br />
be<br />
screening to exclude those not feasible for vocational<br />
later<br />
rehabilitation services.<br />
Rehabilitation should also work with thosewho.<br />
Vocational<br />
the intellectually retarded seek self-support. Many retardates<br />
help<br />
state schools can be helped with the proper facilities. These<br />
in<br />
are small ones in population centers. Both supporting staff<br />
usually<br />
student body members are carefully selected from the larger popu-<br />
and<br />
lation.<br />
retarded.<br />
The 1969 State Legislature authorized group homes for the<br />
THECOMMISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />
Vocational Rhabilitation cooperate with the Departmen t of<br />
That<br />
in the establishment and support of group living<br />
Institutions<br />
homes for the mentally retarded.<br />
number of retarded in the state is estimated as more<br />
The<br />
30,000. Facilities, schools, and staff to meet their needshave<br />
than<br />
been inadequate. Responsibility for-services to. this severe%y<br />
always<br />
segment of our population is shared by a number Of st.-<br />
handicapped<br />
agencies.<br />
246
public offenders are often offended by society.<br />
So-called<br />
their punishment by fine or jail or .prison they usually return<br />
After<br />
society. Few prisoners are offered rehabilitation services now.<br />
to<br />
potential of juvenile offenders for a long life of crime is great,<br />
The<br />
yet few are known to rehabilitation.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
the Division of .Vocational Rehabilitation work with the<br />
That<br />
law enforcement and other co,unity resources in the<br />
courts,<br />
of rehabilitation programs for offenders and<br />
development<br />
offenders, and that those in need of vocational<br />
potential<br />
rehabilitation services, should be served.<br />
AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
there should be an expansion of services to the persons<br />
That<br />
prisons and other correctional institutions so that by<br />
in<br />
all prisoners below the age of 60 would be referred to<br />
1975<br />
Rehabilitation routinely, with later screening<br />
Vocational<br />
exclude those not feasible for vocational rehabilitation<br />
to<br />
services.<br />
mployment Evaluation and Service Centers for the Disadvantaged<br />
evaluation and service centers are recommended<br />
Employment<br />
the three principal cities of Washington State Seattle, Tacoma,<br />
for<br />
Spokane. Operated by Vocational Rehabilitation these centers<br />
and<br />
be so planned that their principal service would be to the dis-<br />
would<br />
advantaged and handicapped clients of several agencies.<br />
the centers a diagnostic study would determine whether<br />
At<br />
individual is disadvantaged,whether he has an employment handicap,<br />
an<br />
whether he needs rehabilitation services. The thorough diagnostic<br />
and<br />
would examine pertinent psychological, vocational, educational,<br />
study<br />
medical, social and environmental factors which bear on the<br />
cultural,<br />
to employment. The services provided would<br />
individual'shandicap<br />
the individual's pattern of work behavior and occupational<br />
appraise<br />
The center envisioned would have on its staff representative<br />
skills.<br />
from the several social and health services agencies, and<br />
members<br />
manpower agencies such as the Department of Labor and Industries,<br />
from<br />
the Employment Security Department. Working together in a team<br />
and<br />
backedby the resources of their individual agencies, these<br />
approach,<br />
members would be able to solve many of the vocational problems<br />
staff<br />
the severely disabled client.<br />
of<br />
THE GO9ISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
state funds be appropriated for employment and evaluation<br />
That<br />
centers, operated by the Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
service<br />
of the State of Washington, to serve the disadvantaged<br />
agency<br />
and near Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma.<br />
in<br />
247
Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center<br />
of the most powerful combinations of services for the<br />
One<br />
physically disabled person is found in the comprehensive<br />
severely<br />
center. Such a center combines training, medical care,<br />
rehabilitation<br />
care, counseling and guidance in one etting. Although<br />
residential<br />
are several of these centers in the United States meeting the<br />
there<br />
definition forsuch a facility, none is west of Arkansas.<br />
federal<br />
of our crippled who now languish a£ home on welfare can be made<br />
Many<br />
through the services of such a comprehensive center,<br />
self-supporting<br />
neighboring States of Oregon and Alaska have asked that Washington<br />
Our<br />
a regional comprehensive rehabilitation center. Nine-tenths<br />
develop<br />
of the cost of such a center would be paid by the federal government.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
state funds be appropriated for a regional comprehensive<br />
That<br />
center in the State of Washington.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
Multi-Service Centers<br />
program recommended for Washington State also reflects<br />
Another<br />
Commission's concern that resources of the state be readily avail-<br />
the<br />
for the handicapped person seeking help. This is their recom-<br />
able<br />
below regarding multi-service centers. In such a center the<br />
mendation<br />
helping services of government are housed together. The<br />
principal<br />
is able to go easily from one agency to another. He realizes<br />
client<br />
that his several counselors are likely to be in communication.<br />
Seattle Multi-Service.Center, located at 2315 S. Jackson<br />
The<br />
houses a number of social service agencies. The Division of<br />
Street,<br />
Rehabilitation has been represented there since February,<br />
Vocational<br />
in an office manned at first by a single vocational rehabilitation<br />
1968,<br />
and secretary. Midway through the 1969 Fiscal Year a rehabili<br />
officer<br />
aide and a clerical worker were added, and in the spring of 1969<br />
tation<br />
a second vocational rehabilitation officer joined the crew.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
state, and other government and private agencies providing<br />
That<br />
for the handicapped be housed in multi-service centers<br />
services<br />
the state where it can be demonstrated that better<br />
throughout<br />
for the people can be provided. A city like Seattle<br />
services<br />
have several such centers, one in each major neighborhood.<br />
would<br />
plan would be developed so that such agencies now housed<br />
A<br />
would be brought together as soon as leases expire<br />
separately<br />
existing buildings. It would be helpful if health care<br />
on<br />
were contiguous to this center,<br />
facilities<br />
248
Th__e Dr. H. T. Buckner Rehabi li tation Gente_r _ In°red Woren Seattle<br />
Buckner Rehabilitation Center of the State Department<br />
The<br />
Labor and Industries, located in Seattle, serves injured workmen.<br />
of<br />
individuals are provided services in this facility if their<br />
These<br />
is such that they cannot be helped in settings closer to<br />
condition<br />
homes. Payment for services comes from a fund to which the<br />
their<br />
and his employer both contribute. It has been proposed that<br />
worker<br />
industrial accident victims be referred for rehabilitation ser-<br />
more<br />
vices.<br />
THE COW, MISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
an illustrated brochure be prepared tailored toward<br />
That<br />
employer, physician, attorney and insurance carrier<br />
the<br />
the services of vocational rehabilitation as<br />
describing<br />
relate to workmen's compensation.<br />
they<br />
AND FU,RTHER THE COMMISSION RECONDS:<br />
a reporting procedure be devised useful to the screening<br />
That<br />
evaluation of industrially injured cases that could benefit<br />
and<br />
by vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
Coordination with Education<br />
has had an intimate association with various<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
of education from the time it was initiated, In most states<br />
levels<br />
rehabilitation services started in State Departments of<br />
vocational<br />
Only in recent years has there been a strong trend to remove<br />
Education.<br />
rehabilitation program from the direct sponsorship of education.<br />
the<br />
rehabilitation has in the past, and must continue in the<br />
However,<br />
future, its close ties with education..<br />
educational institutions with which vocational rehabili-<br />
The<br />
has most often been connected in the past are the special educa-<br />
tation<br />
programs in the K-12 program, the community colleges, the private<br />
tion<br />
schools, the special education schools operated by the state<br />
vocational<br />
the blind, the deaf, the retarded, and the mentally ill. The<br />
for<br />
Development Center of the University .of Washington has much to<br />
Child<br />
offer vocational rehabilitation.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
vocational rehabilitation services be made available to<br />
That<br />
secondary level special education student.<br />
every<br />
we accept the view that every student enrolled in a<br />
If<br />
education class is handicapped, no effort while this child is<br />
special<br />
school seems too great if it will diminish his handicap and develop<br />
in<br />
potential for successful living. The Commission's recommendation<br />
his<br />
249
efers particularly to the special education student. In 1968<br />
above<br />
one-tenth of these students were involved in the Division's<br />
only<br />
Cooperative School Program.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
the area of overlap between the schools and Vocational<br />
That<br />
be.carefully studied in order to more clearly<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
roles and agree on responsibilities for services to<br />
define<br />
handicapped.<br />
the<br />
AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
each special education client served by the school and<br />
That<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation have a curriculum that is tailored<br />
by<br />
his needs with the best combination of academic instruction,<br />
to<br />
adjustment training and on-the-job experience.<br />
work<br />
AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation accept handicapped high school<br />
That<br />
as early as age 14 in order to provide prevocational<br />
students<br />
guidance and counseling as well as other appropriate services.<br />
Rehabilitation and Health<br />
physicians and health agencies rank second only<br />
Hospitals,<br />
welfare agencies in the number of referrals made to thevocational<br />
to<br />
program. The present working relationship between the<br />
rehabilitation<br />
and the medical professions is regarded as a close and satis-<br />
program<br />
one. Liaison is achieved by the medical director with the<br />
factory<br />
profession, and a unique working arrangement whereby public<br />
medical<br />
officers serve as local medical consultants for vocational<br />
health<br />
officers in their districts and help to carry informa-<br />
rehabilitatio.n<br />
tion about rehabilitation services into the profession.<br />
health planning will touch most aspects of<br />
Comprehensive<br />
delivering rehabilitation services. An exchange of informa-<br />
programs<br />
tion between the two programs should be maintained.<br />
need for more hospital beds has been stressed by Justus<br />
The<br />
Lehmann, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation<br />
F.<br />
of Washington, Seattle. The average hospital stay of a<br />
University<br />
group of stroke patients with severe involvement, he found,<br />
selected<br />
approximately 30 days. Based on this finding, he proposed that<br />
was<br />
should be at least one rehabilitation bed per 5,000 population.<br />
there<br />
Hill Burton Hospital construction program provides more generously<br />
The<br />
one bed per 2,000. Using Dr. Lehmann's figure as the more realis-<br />
for<br />
the number of rehabilitation beds in the Seattle area alone needs<br />
tic,<br />
be increased from the 1968 total of 81 to a projected 240 by 1972.<br />
to<br />
Medicine and ancillary staff need to be provided to serve the cardiac<br />
250
stroke and other patients in these beds.<br />
recommendation concerning rehabilitation counselors would<br />
A<br />
members of the professional staff to acquire greater competency<br />
help<br />
in health services.<br />
THE CO4ISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
an orientation and training program be initiated and<br />
That<br />
for rehabilitaton counselors to inform them through<br />
continued<br />
seminars and visits to facilities within the<br />
demonstration,<br />
of the problems faced by clients with heart disease,<br />
state<br />
cancer, stroke and other severely disabling conditions.<br />
AND FURTHER THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
vocational rehabilitation use personnel to contact people<br />
That<br />
with the handicapped to increase awareness of the<br />
working<br />
rehabilitation programs in the state. The abilities<br />
vocational<br />
the agency to help handicapped and disadvantaged people and<br />
of<br />
its limitations should be described.<br />
AND FURTHER THE CO4ISSION RECONDS:<br />
in addition to the training of the handicapped there is<br />
That<br />
tremendous need to train ancillary personnel: physical<br />
a<br />
therapists, occupational therapists, speech and hearing special-<br />
vocational evaluators, psychologists, administrators,<br />
ists,<br />
to staff the workshops, rehabilitation houses, and other<br />
etc.,<br />
facilities now .in existence or projected for the<br />
rehabilitation<br />
future.<br />
Seattle Artificial Kidney Center<br />
care provided at the Kidney Center is essential to<br />
Medical<br />
life of the people served there. The Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
the<br />
has been supportive of this effort, and has placed clients<br />
program<br />
the center. The Commission sees the services of the Center as<br />
in<br />
medical care rather than vocational rehabilitation services.<br />
Blind<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
in the future state funds to support kidney patients should<br />
That<br />
through the State Department of Health rather than Voca-<br />
come<br />
tional Rehabilitation.<br />
rehabilitation services for the blind and visually handi-<br />
Special<br />
should be continued. Presently offered by the Services to the<br />
capped<br />
Blind under the Department of Public Assistance these services<br />
251
in nature, should be under the administration of Voca-<br />
rehabilitative<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
tional<br />
Deaf<br />
THE COMMISSIONRECO4ENDS:<br />
transfer should be made of the vocational rehabilitation<br />
That<br />
of Services to the Blind from the Department of Public<br />
aspects<br />
Assistance to Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
training is a requirement for professional coun-<br />
Special<br />
who work with the deaf. The low percentage of cases in the<br />
selors<br />
caseload of the rehabilitation program must be indicative<br />
present<br />
some failure of the program to meet these needs.<br />
of<br />
Counselors with communication skills are needed and<br />
More<br />
be brought into the program.<br />
should<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
state-supported nursery schools and home therapy services<br />
That<br />
established for the deaf, hard-of-hearing and language-<br />
be<br />
de layed child.<br />
people who are blind are granted an extra income tax<br />
The<br />
by the Internal Revenue Service. The deaf, who are equally<br />
exemption<br />
have no exemption. If the blind have an extra income<br />
handicapped,<br />
exemption, so should those who are deaf.<br />
tax<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
Congress explore income tax exemptions for various<br />
That<br />
of the handicapped,<br />
categories<br />
Migrant Workers<br />
farm workers are mong the most abused and<br />
Migrant<br />
segments of society. They are most apt to be ignorant,<br />
handicapped<br />
sick, non-productive. Services to them could improve the health<br />
poor,<br />
society as well as their own. As a group, migrant farm workers<br />
of<br />
most in need of literacy training, consumer protection, decent<br />
are<br />
health care, services to family members, and training in<br />
housing,<br />
proper spending of their earnings.<br />
THE COM#$ISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
State Division of Vocational Rehabilitation efforts be<br />
That<br />
to serve migrant farm workers and that federal grants<br />
expanded<br />
should be sought to help support such enhanced services.<br />
252
Indians<br />
are the most disabled ethnic group in the State of<br />
Indians<br />
They are lowest of all in income, in education and in<br />
Washington.<br />
care. They are the most deprived socially of all in the state.<br />
health<br />
has been recommended that they be provided with a better chance for<br />
It<br />
vocational success.<br />
THE COM#$ISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation develop more<br />
That<br />
of delivering vocational rehabilitation<br />
effectivemethods<br />
to.handicapped Indians. Indians should be recruited<br />
services<br />
staff members counselors, aides, clerical assistants<br />
as<br />
work with the reservation Indians and other concentrations<br />
to<br />
Indians.<br />
of<br />
Labor Organizations<br />
citizens of our state are active members of labor<br />
Many<br />
These unions were early and strong supporters of rehabili-.<br />
unions.<br />
tation agencies.<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
relationships among unions, employers, and Vocational<br />
That<br />
be strengthened. Vocational rehabilitation<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
should have easy access to.potential rehabilitation<br />
counselors<br />
and to the supporting data, and should collaborate<br />
candidates<br />
union representatives, others associated with the union's<br />
with<br />
of services, and representatives of management, such<br />
network<br />
shop foremen. A team composed of representatives from the<br />
as<br />
center (if there isone), theunion, and Vocational<br />
health<br />
can function as a steering group for all rehab-<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
activity.<br />
ilitation<br />
AND aOMMZSSION R eO NDS:<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation develop procedures that will<br />
That<br />
employers and labor unions to make early referrals to<br />
enable<br />
Rehabilitation of employees who have drinking and<br />
Vocational<br />
problems that affect their performance or behavior on<br />
other<br />
the job.<br />
knowledge and use of the union power structure<br />
Systematic<br />
communication channels are necessary ifthis is to be accomplished.<br />
and<br />
the leadership publicizes and legitimizes rehabilitation services<br />
When<br />
its members, the membership will respond,<br />
among<br />
253
THE PUBLIC SERVED<br />
members of Vocational Rehabilitauion should be aware<br />
Staff<br />
social changes and their own role in these changes.<br />
of<br />
rehabilitation program started with .clients who were<br />
The<br />
orthopedically handicapped. These people wanted and were pro-<br />
most].y<br />
vocational training to help overcome their handicap. The men-<br />
vided<br />
ill, the mentally retarded, the public offender, the socially<br />
tally<br />
the alcoholic, and other major groups of disabled people<br />
disadvantaged,<br />
excluded from these services at first by law. Afterwards they<br />
were<br />
excluded by custom. Only recently, and reluctantly, has the pro-<br />
were<br />
worked with these groups of handicapped people.<br />
gram<br />
started out to be a program to provide services to<br />
What<br />
motivated individuals in need of training has changed substan-<br />
well<br />
It was implied in the beginning that clients had all the<br />
tially.<br />
Boy Scout virtues--trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly,<br />
traditional<br />
kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and rever-<br />
courteous,<br />
In contrast at this time we find that many of our clients are<br />
ent.<br />
and dirty, deceitful and irresponsible, without gratitude. They<br />
mean<br />
actively or passively thwart efforts to make themselves self-<br />
either<br />
supporting.<br />
is the clientele with which the rehabilitation counselor<br />
This<br />
The courageous and the cowardly, the deficient and the defeated<br />
deals.<br />
among the deserving disabled, disadvantaged, and deprived who<br />
are<br />
their way to his door. Many of them will meet eligibility require-<br />
make<br />
for service. For those accepted by the program, the rehabili-<br />
ments<br />
process can offer services designed to help them reach an optimum<br />
tation<br />
level of self-sufficiency, self-reliance and self-supporto<br />
respond differently to a handicap, probably be-<br />
Individuals<br />
of their interactionwith society. Some are strengthened by<br />
cause<br />
try harder than most, emphasize their assets, attempt to<br />
adversity,<br />
in life despite.the handicap. Others do the opposite. Society<br />
succeed<br />
is beginning to reward the better attributes of the handicapped.<br />
and others who have worked in rehabilitation<br />
Counselors<br />
that the services provided result in a number of secondary gains<br />
know<br />
the individual. Efforts to make the rehabilitation client employ-<br />
for<br />
result in a number of other gains. First of all, his own.con-<br />
able<br />
is usually restored. His worth in the eyes of his family and<br />
fidence<br />
is enhanced. He is looked upon favorably by potential employers.<br />
friends<br />
he becomes a self-respecting, self-supporting law-abiding citi-<br />
Soon<br />
of his community. The secondary gains often outweigh the primary<br />
zen<br />
just as the return to the government in taxes outweighs the<br />
ones,<br />
of rehabilitation services.<br />
costs<br />
rehabilitation staff member working with the handicapped<br />
The<br />
has many more resources than were available a few years ago.<br />
today<br />
He is liable to have even more resources by 1975. Not only are<br />
254
care resources improved; education has made great strides in<br />
medical<br />
years. The proliferation of community colleges which provide<br />
recent<br />
basic education beyond the high school is one example. Educa-<br />
good<br />
is nearly universal now. With programmed instruction and other<br />
tion<br />
teaching techniques it is rapidly getting much better.<br />
the best example of an improvement in rehabilitation<br />
Probably<br />
is the change.in governmental structure. The delivery system<br />
services<br />
rehabilitation services in the Stateof Washington differs from<br />
of<br />
of two years ago. Other important improvements are expected.<br />
that<br />
coordination will be made mandatory by reorganization in<br />
Interagency<br />
state and in the nation. Particularly in the cities and towns where<br />
the<br />
centers for the delivery of government services are being<br />
multi-service<br />
we should expect a reduction in the gaps in service to<br />
established,<br />
a reduction in the duplication of services, and a<br />
handicapped.people,<br />
more economical and more dependable delivery of services,<br />
quicker,<br />
need for vocational rehabilitation services is great.<br />
The<br />
program falls far short of reaching the 37,500 handicapped and<br />
The<br />
disabled who, it is estimated, could benefit annually from services.<br />
need for greater appropriations more services, and<br />
The<br />
staff has been stressed, The achievement of goals envisioned<br />
improved<br />
the Commission in its study requires the concerned involvement of<br />
by<br />
and of lay and professional organizations in our communities.<br />
citizens,<br />
these potential supporters of the program of their<br />
Informing<br />
in the helping services is the responsibility of the Vocational<br />
roles<br />
Rehabilitaton agency.<br />
THECOMMISSIONRECOMMENDS:<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation in its involve-<br />
That<br />
in community action planning for services in poor neigh-<br />
ment<br />
arrange for poor people themselves to participate in<br />
borhoods<br />
planning.<br />
the<br />
AND FURTHER, THE COmmISSION RECOMMENDS<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation work with<br />
That<br />
agencies to find means of delivering vocational rehabili-<br />
other<br />
tation and educational services in the rural areas of Washington.<br />
force members were quick to note and report from all<br />
Task<br />
of the state that the services of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
sections<br />
not well known. Some of their recommendations were directed<br />
are<br />
correcting this situation. The following are quoted from task<br />
toward<br />
force reports.<br />
255
and<br />
the Division employ personnel to contact physicians<br />
"...that<br />
other professionals working with the handicapped to increase<br />
and<br />
awareness of the Vocational Rehabilitation program."<br />
the Division develop a more comprehensive public<br />
"...that<br />
program."<br />
information<br />
How Shall Services be Delivered?<br />
placement of the vocational rehabilitation agency in<br />
The<br />
government•is a factor which determines to a degree the efficacy<br />
state<br />
extensiveness of the services to be delivered. The State Planning<br />
and<br />
is on record as recommending that the agency be placed in<br />
Commission<br />
social service complex under one of the reorganization plans proposed<br />
a<br />
1968 by the Governor's Task Force on Executive Organization. First<br />
in<br />
of the Task Force was placement of the agency in a manpower<br />
choice<br />
which would consolidate the functions of the Employment Security<br />
complex<br />
the Department of Labor and Industry, and the Vocational<br />
Department,<br />
agency, a recommendation which was qualified by the<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
"it can be argued with some justification that the Voca-<br />
statement,<br />
Rehabilitation program should be placed within the Department<br />
tional<br />
of Social and Health Services."<br />
legislation introduced in the 1969 session of the<br />
Other<br />
Legislature proposed the creation of a Department of Vocational<br />
State<br />
Rehabilitation with a director appointed by the •Governor.<br />
1975, a safe prediction seems to be that•the Division<br />
By<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation, under the administration of the Coor-<br />
of<br />
dinating Council for Occupational Education will no longer exist.<br />
the larger social service complex the Commission could<br />
In<br />
see benefits to the•rehabilitation program, when operation<br />
accruing<br />
were mandated by the agency head to insure coordination<br />
procedures<br />
services and full working cooperation with other units of the<br />
of<br />
agency. Hopefully, this would result in a stronger affirma-<br />
larger<br />
of•the rehabilitation philosophy and could be accomplished with-<br />
tion<br />
damage to the unique and individual services which characterize<br />
out<br />
rehabilitation program.<br />
the<br />
the final months of the project the Commission was<br />
During<br />
up in a maze of legislative indecision and indifference. Pro-<br />
caught<br />
legislation which might have resulted in new administrative<br />
posed<br />
died in the Senate Rules Committee, after having passed the<br />
patterns<br />
House of Representatives nd one Senate Committee.<br />
256
A Needed Assessment of the Federal Program<br />
one sense the role of the Planning Commissions for Voca-<br />
In<br />
Rehabilitation in the several states was preempted by the publi-<br />
tional<br />
in January 1968, of a ll5-page REPORT OF TE NATIONAL CITIZENS<br />
cation<br />
COMMITTEE ON VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION. They said it all and<br />
ADVISORY<br />
well. Their assessment of vocational rehabilitation and their<br />
very<br />
are all that is needed at the federal level. The idealism<br />
remedies<br />
the practicality they have shown could lead vocational rehabilita-<br />
and<br />
for the decade of the 70's. Howard A. Rusk, M.D., the Director<br />
tion<br />
the Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York City, was the<br />
of<br />
No person from Washington State served as a member of this<br />
chairman.<br />
committee.<br />
Report contains criticisms of the Federal Vocational<br />
The<br />
establishment, criticisms difficult for a state rehabili-<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
agency to make. There seems to be little federal involvement<br />
tation<br />
control of--the State of Washington's Vocational Rehabilita-<br />
in--and<br />
program, although about 80 percent of all the funds come from<br />
tion<br />
sources.<br />
federal<br />
administrators of the Vocational Rehabilitation program<br />
The<br />
Washington State and in other states, have asked for simplified<br />
of<br />
programs and regulations with appropriations made far enough<br />
federal<br />
advance for orderly expenditures by state and local agencies.<br />
in<br />
cuts in vocational rehabilitation federal appropriations<br />
Substantial<br />
during a fiscal year for that fiscal year, can have a damaging<br />
made<br />
A number of state agencies including Washington State's,<br />
effect.<br />
damaged catastrophically by such a reduction in federal appro-<br />
were<br />
in 1968. Dependable amounts of appropriations should be<br />
priations<br />
at least six months prior to the beginning of a fiscal year<br />
announced<br />
the expenditures are to be made in a prodent and frugal way. It<br />
if<br />
too much to expect a state agency to be responsible fiscally if<br />
is<br />
thefederal appropriations are made too late for sound planning.<br />
W. Gardner was Secretary of Health, Education, and<br />
John<br />
at the time the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />
Welfare<br />
was authorized. In another context he recently said, "We are<br />
tation<br />
clever at avoiding self-examination." People legitimately<br />
enormously<br />
change which institutions often stubbornly resist, The rehab-<br />
demand<br />
agencies in the United States are in a context where .the<br />
ilitation<br />
rush of change brings a kind of instant antiquity.<br />
Reuben J. Margolin, Ed.D., in a January 1968 article said:<br />
is nothing wrong with admitting our inadequacies and<br />
There<br />
our professions could be enhanced greatly by remedying<br />
that<br />
deficiencies. The fact that we have them does not<br />
these<br />
the reality of the important contributions we are<br />
alter<br />
making to the rehabilitation of the disabled. When we<br />
257
complete satisfaction with our performance, our<br />
express<br />
potential and correspondingly our potential for<br />
learning<br />
clients becomes somewhat limited. Dissatisfaction<br />
assisting<br />
at the very heart of the professional growth process,<br />
is<br />
it we cannot maintain or increase our competence.<br />
Without<br />
contends that dissatisfaction with .existing conditions<br />
Miel<br />
seems to be a prerequisite for intentional change.<br />
growth of the rehabilitation programs in the several<br />
The<br />
and state agencies is related to the successes rehabilitation<br />
federal<br />
had and the expectation that more rehabilitation services will<br />
has<br />
our handicapped people with some solutions to their problems.<br />
provide<br />
Again, quoting from John Gardner, NO EASY VICTORIES:<br />
modern belief that man's institutions can accomplish<br />
The<br />
about anything he wants, when he wants it, leads to<br />
just<br />
certain characteristic contemporary phenomena.<br />
is the bitterness and anger toward our institutions<br />
One<br />
well up when high hopes turn sour. No observer of the<br />
that<br />
scene has failed to note the prevalent cynicism<br />
modern<br />
all leaders, all officials, all social institu-<br />
concerning<br />
That cynicism iscontinually fed and renewed by<br />
tions.<br />
rage of people who expected too much in the first place<br />
the<br />
and got too little in the end.<br />
Why the Emphasis on Vocational Rehabilitation?<br />
numerous ways we have learned that work isimportant.<br />
In<br />
is a statement in Spanish on the wall of the East Los Angeles,<br />
There<br />
Multi-Service Center, "Trabago honesto, justamente recom-<br />
California,<br />
This is translated as, "Honest work, justly rewarded."<br />
pensado."<br />
general assembly of theUnited Nations proclaimed The<br />
The<br />
Declaration o__fHuman Rights. Article 23 of this declara ---<br />
Universal<br />
tion is as follows:<br />
23. (i) Everyone has the right to work, to free<br />
Article<br />
of employment, to just and favourable conditions<br />
choice<br />
work and to protection against unemployment.<br />
of<br />
Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right<br />
(2)<br />
equal pay for equal work.<br />
to<br />
Everyone who works has the right to just and favour-<br />
(3)<br />
remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an<br />
able<br />
worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if<br />
existence<br />
by other means of social protection.<br />
necessary,<br />
Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions<br />
(4)<br />
by the protection of his interests.<br />
his Presidential Address to Division 22 (Psychological<br />
In<br />
of Disability) of the American Psychological Association<br />
Aspects<br />
delivered in San Francisco on September i, 1968, Walter S. Neff, of<br />
.258
New York University said:<br />
is quoted as rmnarking that the two most vital human<br />
Freud<br />
are the ability to love and the ability to work,<br />
functions<br />
of course he wrote many volumes on he former and<br />
but<br />
nothing on the latter. His example has been followed<br />
almost<br />
all major theorists of personality, whose chief pre-<br />
by<br />
has been with the demands of interpersonal<br />
occupation<br />
intimacy, rather than with the demands of work.<br />
the Second Bill of Rights of President Franklin D. Roose-<br />
In<br />
below, he begins with employment. It was important in our culture<br />
velt,<br />
then and it is now.<br />
have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights<br />
under which a new basis of security and prosperity can<br />
We<br />
established for all-regardless of station, race, or creed.<br />
be<br />
theseare:<br />
Among<br />
right to a useful and remunerative ob in the industries<br />
The<br />
ShOl or farms or mines of the Nation;<br />
or<br />
right to earn enough to provide adequate food and<br />
The<br />
and recreation;<br />
clothing<br />
right of every farmer to raise and sell his product at a<br />
The<br />
which will give him and his family a decent living;<br />
return<br />
right of every businessman, large and to trade in<br />
The<br />
atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and<br />
an<br />
by monopolies at home.or abroad;<br />
domination<br />
right of every family to a decent home;<br />
The<br />
right to adequate medical care and the oppommity to<br />
The<br />
and enoy good health;<br />
achieve<br />
right to adequate protection from the economic fears<br />
The<br />
old age siclmess, accident,, and unemployment;<br />
of<br />
The right to a good education.,99<br />
creates new problems. Working together with new<br />
Progress<br />
and new tools we seek better solutions.<br />
knowledge<br />
Will Disab.i.Lit y Rates Rise or Diminish?<br />
general protective laws are implemented, it is hoped<br />
As<br />
there will be less disability, therefore, less of a need to<br />
that<br />
259
disabled people. If a practical way could be devised<br />
rehabilitate<br />
encourage young people not to begin smoking tobacco, such as a<br />
to<br />
on advertising of tobacco products, there would be a great reduc-<br />
ban<br />
soon in emphysema, cancer, heart disease, and tuberculosis.<br />
tion<br />
we have general affluence and general education, there<br />
As<br />
be a reduction in mental retardation, as Rodger L. Hurley, stated,<br />
will<br />
in POVERTY AND MENTAL RETARDATION A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP:<br />
widespread prejudice and ignorance often cloud<br />
This<br />
clear fact that poverty in America is one of the<br />
the<br />
significant causes of mental retardation. It<br />
most<br />
to retardation far beyond the more publi-<br />
contributes<br />
damaged believed done by heredity or unontroZabl<br />
cized<br />
suffered by prominent, prosperous families.<br />
accidents<br />
poor endure the tragedy of mental retardation because<br />
The<br />
their poverty to a much greater degree than any other<br />
of<br />
class. The majority of the mentally retarded<br />
socio-economic<br />
the children of the more disadvantaged classes of our<br />
are<br />
society.<br />
way to reduce the need for vocational rehabilitation<br />
Another<br />
would be to reduce the job related accidents. In a Labor Day<br />
services<br />
article, in the New York Times entitled, Industrial Accidents,<br />
1968<br />
PERSONS ARE DISABLED ON JOB THAN IN MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISIONS,<br />
MORE<br />
Howard A. Rusk, M.D., stated:<br />
they bring death so dramatically, automobile<br />
Because<br />
make the headlines, but few of us realize<br />
accidents<br />
accidents on the job.cause more disabling injuries<br />
that<br />
motor vehicles.<br />
than<br />
1966, 2,200,000 persons suffered disabling injuries<br />
In<br />
work compared with 1,900,000 from motor vehicle<br />
at<br />
accidents.<br />
also comes as a surprise to most people that accidents<br />
It<br />
the job cause about i0 times as many working days away<br />
on<br />
from work as do strikes and other work stoppages.<br />
A Look at Washington Rehabilitants<br />
this time the clients of Vocational Rehabilitation in<br />
At<br />
State are similar to the clients of rehabilitation in the<br />
Washington<br />
nation as a whole.<br />
table which follows provides a description of Clients<br />
The<br />
disabling condition:<br />
by<br />
260
WASHINGTON DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM, 1968<br />
Me, or<br />
MAJOR DISABLING CONDITION IN REHABILITATED CASES<br />
Disablin$ Condition<br />
deformities and<br />
Orthopedic<br />
impairments<br />
retardation<br />
Mental<br />
character and<br />
Personality,<br />
disorders<br />
behavior<br />
illness<br />
Mental<br />
Amputation<br />
Cardiac<br />
impairment<br />
Hearing<br />
disabling conditions, visual<br />
Other<br />
speech impairments, drug<br />
and<br />
epilepsy, etc.<br />
addiction,<br />
Assistance clients with<br />
Public<br />
physical disability<br />
no<br />
by Vocational<br />
served<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Number Percent<br />
37.71<br />
610<br />
14.32<br />
232<br />
9.72<br />
157<br />
8.54<br />
139<br />
5.06<br />
82<br />
4.84<br />
78<br />
70 4.34<br />
251 15.47<br />
1,619 i00.00<br />
1,855<br />
costs for rehabilitation services in Washington State<br />
The<br />
significantly from the national norms. Nationwide, nearly eight<br />
vary<br />
of the expenditures for vocational rehabilitation services<br />
percent<br />
to specialized rehabilitation facilities. In Washington State,<br />
go<br />
there are no such facilities meeting the federal definition no<br />
where<br />
at all is spent in this way. In the case of severely handi-<br />
money<br />
clients, most of them are denied services because of the lack<br />
capped<br />
these specialized facilities. It is to be noted that Commission<br />
of<br />
have been made for special rehabilitation facilities<br />
recommendations<br />
Washington State.<br />
in<br />
THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS<br />
state funds be appropriated for employment and evaluation<br />
That<br />
operated by the Vocational Rehabilitation agency of<br />
centers,<br />
.261
State of Washington. to serve the disadvantaged in and<br />
the<br />
Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma.<br />
near<br />
AND FURTHER THE COISSION RECOMMENDS:<br />
state funds be appropriated for a regional compre-<br />
That<br />
rehabilitation center in the State of Washington.<br />
hensive<br />
range of appropriations--federal, state, local--<br />
The<br />
for vocational rehabilitation in Washington State by the year<br />
needed<br />
is $i00 million to $120 million if the estimated 37,500 handi-<br />
1975<br />
and disadvantaged eligible and interested persons are served<br />
6apped<br />
annually.<br />
Region<br />
and<br />
Stae<br />
of Total Expendlturaa by Category (General Agencies)<br />
Percent<br />
Year 1967<br />
Fiscal<br />
Guidance<br />
Caae<br />
and<br />
F1aeesnt Services<br />
Sall<br />
Buslnass<br />
Enterprises<br />
Workshops<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Facilities<br />
9.5<br />
U. S. Total 4.7 0.5 1.2 7.9<br />
26.2<br />
43.3<br />
Washlnton 7,5 0.7 5,0 ,0<br />
43.5<br />
workshops in Washington State cost approximately five<br />
The<br />
of the total budget of Vocational Rehabilitation. In the<br />
percent<br />
as a whole, they receive only approximately one percent. The<br />
nation<br />
in this state have benefited from this expenditure.. They<br />
workshops<br />
been able to serve.quite well several kinds of rehabilitation<br />
have<br />
To a degree, they have taken up the slack caused by the<br />
clients.<br />
of comprehensive rehabilitation facilities again, as defined<br />
absence<br />
the Federal Rehabilitation Services Administration. The Physical<br />
by<br />
and Rehabilitation Unit of the University Hospital in Seattle,<br />
Medicine<br />
a deserved national reputation for excellence for the kinds of<br />
has<br />
services which they provide.<br />
the above chart also shows, the cost of administering the<br />
As<br />
program in Washington State is about fifty percent<br />
rehabilitation<br />
than for the nation as a whole. It may be possible to expand<br />
higher<br />
rehabilitation program in Washington State substantially without<br />
the<br />
enlargingthe present administrative staff significantly.<br />
possible way to reduce the cost of rehabilitation<br />
Another<br />
per client is to improve the delivery system of services.<br />
services<br />
262
is not easy, as Mary E. Switzer told the National Rehabilitation<br />
This<br />
meeting in New Orleans in 1968. Her statement is recorded<br />
Association<br />
an article in the Journal of Rehabilitation entitled, COORDINATION:<br />
in<br />
PROBLEM AND A PROMISE. She said:<br />
A<br />
achievement of coordination is essential in the very<br />
The<br />
and complex job of delivering services to people<br />
difficult<br />
we are tofulfill our mission and make federal, state,<br />
if<br />
local dollars--whether they be public or private--<br />
and<br />
really pay the dividends they are intended to pay.<br />
is not calculated planning and analysis alone which have<br />
It<br />
so short a time produced our present array of federal human resource<br />
in<br />
About 459 such programs are described in the annual catalog<br />
programs.<br />
federal systems programs, produced by the Office of Economic Oppor-<br />
of<br />
Coordination among them remains to be achieved. As Charles<br />
tunity.<br />
Odell, Director of the Uo S. Employment Service stated,<br />
E.<br />
number of manpower and anti-poverty programs have been<br />
A<br />
during the past eight years, which provide<br />
established<br />
to assist the disadvantaged. These include such<br />
tools<br />
as outreach, orientation and assessment, (includ-<br />
services<br />
work sample testing).coaching, counseling, basic<br />
ing<br />
occupational training, training allowances,<br />
education,<br />
assistance and relocation allowances, job develop-<br />
mobility<br />
and placement, supportive services, and follow-up and<br />
ment<br />
to assure acceptanceand adjustment on the<br />
follow-through<br />
ob.<br />
programs that provide.these services are funded from<br />
The<br />
wide variety of sources and are usually regarded as<br />
a<br />
structured programs, rather than<br />
separatevertically<br />
parts of oneover-all program. Furthermore,<br />
integral<br />
for the disadvantaged are being performed by a<br />
services<br />
different agencies, who are often competing with<br />
numberof<br />
other toassist the same client or to enlist the<br />
each<br />
of the same employer,<br />
cooperation<br />
describing the National Citizens Conference on Rehabili-<br />
In<br />
of the Disabled and Disadvantaged, to be held in the Mayflower<br />
tation<br />
in Washington, D. C. from June 24 to June 27, 1969, Secretary<br />
Hotel<br />
Health, Education, and Welfare Robert H. Finch said:<br />
of<br />
are aware that many of todayVs public and private pro-<br />
You<br />
do not meet people's needs as well as they should.<br />
grams<br />
the physically and mentally disabled, but.many<br />
Notonly<br />
Americans are handicapped in obtaining education,<br />
other<br />
training, jobs, or medical care.<br />
263
is our hope that the Conference, by bringing together<br />
It<br />
who provide services with the consumers who need<br />
those<br />
will eliminate some of the roadblocks that do exist<br />
them,<br />
stimulate action in States and communities throughout<br />
and<br />
the country.<br />
a recent article Joseph Hunt, Commissioner, Rehabilitation<br />
In<br />
Administration, described the decade of progress which ended<br />
Services<br />
the fiscal year 1968. He found much to approve of in that year.<br />
in<br />
saw the achievements of 1968 as being the result of a long period<br />
He<br />
of preparation, in his words:<br />
was accomplished in 1968 and what that accomplishment<br />
What<br />
for the future is the result of all the effort in<br />
means<br />
years. It is the result, for example of the 1943<br />
previous<br />
when the mentally disabled were made eligible for<br />
legislation<br />
it is the result of the 1954 law which gave us<br />
services;<br />
and training of personnel; it is the result of the<br />
research<br />
amendments which gave us increased federal financial<br />
1965<br />
and the new construction and improvement pro-<br />
participation<br />
grams for facilities, among other things.<br />
year 1968 was the formative year of the Rehabilitation<br />
Fiscal<br />
Administrationunder the newly organized Social and<br />
Services<br />
Service. The new agency has the purpose of<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
a unified approach to the problems of needy<br />
providing<br />
with special emphasis on the family and at the<br />
Americans,<br />
time to assure continued special emphasis upon serving<br />
same<br />
the aged, the handicapped, and children.<br />
stresses a rehabilitation philosophy within its several<br />
SRS<br />
units; .provides for better program coordina-<br />
organizational<br />
and makes a separation of payment and service functions.<br />
.tion;<br />
mission is directed at the best possible delivery of<br />
Its<br />
the community where the people who need the<br />
services.in<br />
live.<br />
help<br />
Lea__d Tim____e i__qn Staffin $<br />
potential success of the rehabilitation program in Wash-<br />
The<br />
State is also dependent upon preparation. The achievements of<br />
ington<br />
rehabilitation counselor training program at theUniversity of<br />
the<br />
are a case in point. Years of preparation are required<br />
Washington<br />
the first graduate begins helping clients in a rehabilitation<br />
before<br />
The recommendations made by the Planning Commission for<br />
agency.<br />
Rehabilitation in the field of training are likely to have<br />
Vocational<br />
but fewer immediate benefits. Staff training and<br />
longtermbenefits,<br />
retraining is time consuming and costly but is vital.<br />
264
Information GBe$ins Early<br />
the program which will take the longest of all to<br />
Perhaps<br />
its purpose would be an effort to put vocational rehabili-<br />
accomplish<br />
information in the textbooks utilized by the students studying<br />
tation<br />
in our schools. A survey of these textbooks used in the school<br />
health<br />
of the State of Washington was made by Mrs. Jean Mead, Research<br />
systems<br />
assigned to the Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabili-<br />
Analyst,<br />
This 1968 study of hers revealed that there is almost no<br />
tation.<br />
information about the vital rehabilitation program, even<br />
textbook<br />
in the United States the expenditure level in that year for<br />
though<br />
exceeded half a billion dollars. If rehabilitation<br />
rehabilitation<br />
can be known to junior high and high school age students,<br />
services<br />
of whom take required courses in health, then the fund of infor-<br />
many<br />
about this service would expand. The staff of the Planning<br />
mation<br />
in March 1968, asked the Rehabilitation Services Adminis-<br />
Commission,<br />
about the utilization of textbooks to inform the public about<br />
tration<br />
services. The letter ofinquiry follows:<br />
rehabilitation<br />
the statewide Planning Commission moves into communities<br />
As<br />
Washington State to study regional needs for voca-<br />
within<br />
rehabilitation through task forces, our members<br />
tional<br />
often find that very.little is known about the program,<br />
too<br />
services, purpose, general availability, etc, Dis-<br />
its<br />
on how to overcome this "knowledge gap" take off<br />
cussions<br />
many directions, lead to no specific answers, but do<br />
in<br />
a great many questions. Some of these we would<br />
generate<br />
like to field to the Federal Office.<br />
have wondered if a survey of textbooks used in secondary<br />
We<br />
and in teacher-training programs in our colleges<br />
schools<br />
universities would show information about the vocational<br />
and<br />
program in texts in the social sciences,<br />
rehabilitation<br />
physical education civics and government, and<br />
health,<br />
to name the more obvious subject fields. Do<br />
sociology,<br />
of disability, for example, refer to established<br />
discussions<br />
programs .where persons afflicted with a disability<br />
existing<br />
may find help?<br />
are wondering whether a survey of tis kind has ever been<br />
We<br />
by the Federal Office, possibly by contacting textbook<br />
made<br />
directly. Another question that comes tomind<br />
publishers<br />
whether any effort has been made t the Federal level to<br />
is<br />
information on the vocational rehabilitation program<br />
have<br />
into textbooks.<br />
put<br />
response of Ralph W. Susman, Chief, Program Planning and<br />
The<br />
Branch, was in part, as follows:<br />
Development<br />
has asked me to reply to your letter of<br />
Commissioner,Hunt<br />
27, 1968. To our knowledge the Federal Office has<br />
March<br />
265
directly communicated with textbook publishers concern-<br />
not<br />
the inclusion of any vocational rehabilitation material<br />
ing<br />
textbooks available to schools on any level. To our<br />
in<br />
no survey of the type you mentioned has ever been<br />
knowledge<br />
done.<br />
must be remembered that rehabilitation, and certainly<br />
It<br />
rehabilitation of the disabled, is a comparatively<br />
vocational<br />
field of study. As both academia and publishers become<br />
new<br />
aware of the medical, social, psychological and voca-<br />
more<br />
aspects of rehabilitation, we are sure they will wish<br />
tional<br />
include information about rehabilitation in books, maga-<br />
to<br />
and all other media used for public education. At<br />
zines,<br />
time however, inclusion of any material on rehabilita-<br />
this<br />
would be primarily dependent upon the authors of the<br />
tion<br />
textbooks and not on the publishers.<br />
various<br />
is our hope that through the Statewide planning projects<br />
It<br />
many citizens of the State on all levels, the<br />
involving<br />
of the total field and the needs within the field<br />
knowledge<br />
become more recognized, Many of the projects have a<br />
will<br />
committee studying and evaluating this "knowledge<br />
separate<br />
as you so aptly phrase it, and its relationship to the.<br />
gap"<br />
area of public relations--which in turn relates to<br />
larger<br />
acceptance or rejection of any programs by the public<br />
the<br />
sector.<br />
recommend that Rehabilitation Services Administration<br />
We<br />
members inform authors of textbooks in the social and health<br />
staff<br />
field, in psychology, social work,.political science, and<br />
services<br />
In order to have the textbooks contain information about<br />
medicine.<br />
services to rehabilitate the handicapped and disadvan-<br />
governmental<br />
a more subtle approach might also be utilized, and these books<br />
taged,<br />
written in such a way that they present the idea that a full life<br />
be<br />
economic self-sufficency are not necessarily denied the individual<br />
and<br />
a disabling physical, mental, or social condition. Efforts to<br />
with<br />
the positive .influence on the individual and on society which<br />
show<br />
rehabilitation can make to the handicapped should be pre<br />
vocational<br />
sented.<br />
Directory<br />
REHABILITATION RESOURCES DIRECTORY was published in 1964,<br />
The<br />
in 1967 as a cooperative venture of the State Department of<br />
revised<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the Office of<br />
Health,<br />
State Superintendent of Public Instruction. This kind of. publica-<br />
the<br />
tion is needed, but it is difficult to keep such a work current.<br />
order to improve the communications in the state about<br />
In<br />
governmental and non-governmental services to the handicapped,<br />
both<br />
266
should be a directory published in loose-leaf form which<br />
there<br />
these services, The services to be described should include<br />
describes<br />
provided by the major state agencies such as Institutions Public<br />
those<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation, Department of Health Employ-<br />
Assistance,<br />
Security, Labor and Industries the Judicial system, State Patrol,<br />
ment<br />
Also included would be county, city, and other local services.<br />
etc.<br />
might well be nonProfit organizations which provide services.<br />
Included<br />
would include such organizations as the Goodwill Industries,<br />
These<br />
Heart Association, United Good Neighbors, the Catholic Charities,<br />
the<br />
Vocational Services, and the like. The services offered the<br />
Jewish<br />
by the various educational institutions from the elementary<br />
public<br />
with its PTA through the multiple services of the great univer-<br />
school<br />
sities should be.included.<br />
directory should be published and kept current by the<br />
This<br />
Community Affairs and Development Agency. The book should be<br />
State<br />
to individuals likely to be called upon for advice about<br />
distributed<br />
These would include governmentworkers, counselors physicians,<br />
services.<br />
ministers, and the like, If such a directory of current<br />
teachers,<br />
were widely disseminated, people in need of services would<br />
information<br />
likely obtain those services. This.communication to the people<br />
more<br />
need, plus the recommended changes in the delivery system of govern-<br />
in<br />
services such as would be available at a multiservice center<br />
mental<br />
better assure that those needing services will be able to obtain<br />
will<br />
them.<br />
IN WASHINGTON STATE: PROGRAMS PROVIDED BY<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
AGENCIES, was published in 1968 by the Planning Commission for<br />
STATE<br />
Rehabilitation. Also publishedin 1968 by the Planning<br />
Vocational<br />
was the DIRECTORY OF AGENCIES PROVIDING WORK TRAINING AND/OR<br />
Commission<br />
SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE.<br />
Rehabilitation Is now only one of many agencies<br />
Vocational<br />
thepopular term "rehabilitation" to describe program efforts.<br />
using<br />
other activities which.have the effect of rehabilitation upon<br />
These<br />
indiviuals served are a wholesome development. Such imitation<br />
the<br />
can be considered a compliment.<br />
almost all other agencies are subject to some<br />
However,<br />
not felt by Vocational Rehabilitation. The uniqueness<br />
limitations<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation among agencies serving disadvantaged<br />
about<br />
is described in a publication of the Council of State Admin-<br />
people<br />
of Vocational Rehabilitation, THE SATEFEDERAL VOCATIONAL<br />
istrators<br />
PROGRAM LOOKS TO THE FUTURE, in these words;<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
strength of the state vocational rehabilitation programs<br />
The<br />
a total program of services to handicapped people stems<br />
in<br />
a considerable extent from the unique qualities of the<br />
to<br />
Some of these are discussed briefly in the<br />
programs.<br />
following paragraphs:<br />
267
The vocational rehabilitation agencies are responsible<br />
i.<br />
providing vocational rehabilitation services to all<br />
for<br />
youth and adults with employment problems. In<br />
disabled<br />
a state vocational rehabilitation agency cannot ex-<br />
fact,<br />
any class of handicapped people and receive federal<br />
clude<br />
Most agencies with related programs have services<br />
funds.<br />
to a specific class of the handicapped, such as<br />
limited<br />
mentally ill, the mentally retarded, the alcoholic, the<br />
the<br />
offender, etc., or to certain age groups.<br />
Vocational rehabilitation agencies have authority to<br />
2.<br />
substantially all of the services that are needed<br />
provide<br />
evaluate the rehabilitation potential of the individual<br />
to<br />
prepare him for employment. Most agencies with related<br />
and<br />
are limited to the provision of specified services,<br />
programs<br />
as medical services, social, security benefits, voca-<br />
such<br />
training, placement, etc. The opportunity to provide<br />
tional<br />
of the services rather than a part of the services needed<br />
all<br />
help an individual achieve rehabilitation is an indispen-<br />
to<br />
element in the vocational rehabilitation process and<br />
sable<br />
contributed most substantially to the results that have<br />
has<br />
achieved. It has resulted in the development of a new<br />
been<br />
rehabilitation counseling, the skills of which<br />
profession,<br />
vocational evaluation and integration of all services<br />
include<br />
toward helping a handicapped person solve his pro-<br />
directed<br />
blems.<br />
The services of a state vocational rehabilitation agency<br />
3.<br />
available on equal terms to handicapped people in all<br />
are<br />
of. the state. Services are notdependent upon<br />
subdivisions<br />
action of localgovernmental bodies, although the coop-<br />
the<br />
of subdivisions of the state is sought; these sub-<br />
eration<br />
may contribute to the enrichment of programs for<br />
divisions<br />
own handicapped people,under conditions specified in<br />
their<br />
vocational rehabilitation plans.<br />
state<br />
Laws and regulations governing the administration of<br />
4.<br />
programs in the state are flexible, enabling<br />
rehabilitation<br />
state agency to work with related agencies in almost<br />
the<br />
waythat will expedite the rehabilitation of handicapped<br />
any<br />
Vocational rehabilitation agencies may either pro-<br />
people.<br />
services directly or purchase services from other state<br />
vide<br />
voluntary agencies or from private practitioners. For<br />
or<br />
a state agency may provide directly most counseling<br />
example,<br />
but purchase most of its medical services. This<br />
services<br />
has made it possible for these state vocational<br />
flexibility<br />
agencies to initiate cooperative agreements<br />
rehabilitation<br />
other agencies and to be innovators in developing joint<br />
with<br />
programs.<br />
268
The flexibility of funding of state vocational agency<br />
5.<br />
makes-it possible for state vocational rehabilita-<br />
programs<br />
agencies to be experimental and innovative in their<br />
tion<br />
to the provision of rehabilitation services. As<br />
approach<br />
result of this flexibility, vocational rehabilitation<br />
a<br />
have expanded rapidly in recent years, utilizing<br />
agencies<br />
methods and techniques in the provision of services,<br />
new<br />
initiating rehabilitation services to groups for whom<br />
and<br />
such services were not formerly available.<br />
first priority is to expand appropriations making voca<br />
The<br />
rehabilitation services available to all handicapped individ<br />
tional<br />
in the state by July 1975. Total appropriations, federal and<br />
uals<br />
in 1975 would have to be increased about nine times over the<br />
state,<br />
appropriated per year for the 1969-1971 biennium. Appropria<br />
money<br />
of the magnitude of i00 million to.120 million dollars per year<br />
tions<br />
be required if Vocational Rehabilitation serves the estimated<br />
will<br />
eligible, feasible and interested potential new clients of<br />
37,500<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation in Washington State in 1975.<br />
at the needs of the rehabilitation program we seem<br />
Looking<br />
see it through interlaced dollar signs. Money can add quality, and<br />
to<br />
to the service, employ the staff, expand the program. It can<br />
quantity<br />
the facilities, create new service centers, add beds to hospitals.<br />
build<br />
for brochures, for TV and radio spots it becomes the great com<br />
Spent<br />
It buys the talent for effective administration.<br />
municator.<br />
costs money, Just as seeds do. A gardener<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
for his seed with the knowledge that he will have. a return.<br />
pays<br />
view of the cost to the state of dependency the cost of<br />
In<br />
and maintaining an adequate vocational rehabilitation pro-<br />
developing<br />
would be an investment which should pay large dividends in future<br />
gram<br />
years.<br />
Planning Commission has attempted to describe as many<br />
The<br />
as possible which would improve the functioning of the rehab<br />
programs<br />
programs within the State of Washington and in the nation<br />
ilitation<br />
a whole. Modesty requires the admission that not all problems will<br />
as<br />
solved, even should our recommendations be adopted in full. In the<br />
be<br />
of Ernst Toiler, introducing a volume of his plays:<br />
words<br />
plays collected in this volume ae social dramas and<br />
The<br />
They bear witness to human suffering and to<br />
tragedies.<br />
yet vain struggles to vanquish this suffering. For<br />
fine<br />
unnecessary suffering can bevanquished the suffer-<br />
only<br />
which arises out of the unreason of humanity, out of<br />
ing<br />
inadequate social system. There must always remain a<br />
an<br />
of suffering, the lonely suffering imposed upon<br />
residue<br />
by life and death. And only this residue is<br />
mankind<br />
and inevitable, is the tragic element of life<br />
necessary<br />
of life's symbolizer, art.<br />
and<br />
269
are convinced that the good of the individual served, as<br />
We<br />
as the good of the state itself, will be benefited by attention<br />
well<br />
the recommendations of this Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
to<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
basic purpose of the Planning CommiSsion for Vocational<br />
The<br />
has been to recommend improvements in rehabilitation<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
so that more clients may be better served at a savings to society.<br />
it is that men who can organize themselves and their<br />
Why<br />
and resources to get to the moon apparently<br />
knowledge<br />
do a great many other things of equal worth and<br />
cannot<br />
urgency<br />
greater<br />
fact, the vision, skill, courage and intelligence that<br />
In<br />
gone into the space program ought to shame mankind--<br />
have<br />
Americans in particular. .Because if men can do what<br />
and<br />
astronauts and their earthbound colleagues--human<br />
the<br />
all--have done, why cannot we build the houses we<br />
beings<br />
Why must our cities be choked in traffic and the<br />
need?<br />
polluted air it produces?<br />
are our lakes and rivers so fouled by mankind that, as<br />
Why<br />
Kennedy once said, if you fall in you don't drown,<br />
Bob<br />
dissolve? Why is virtually every major city without<br />
you<br />
safe and comfortable public transportation? Why<br />
clean,<br />
our airways and airports overcrowded to the point of<br />
are<br />
Why does every effort to remove slums and rebuild<br />
scandal?<br />
cities bog down in red tape and red ink?<br />
a nation can train and organize the skilled manpower<br />
When<br />
to launch and recover Apollo, why can't it train<br />
needed<br />
employ the unskilled manpower standing hopeless and<br />
.and<br />
on the ghetto streets? Why are the transient<br />
embittered<br />
on both coasts, Indians in the West, blacks in the<br />
workers<br />
and unfortunates in every state going hungry in the<br />
South<br />
nation in the world? Is it not obscene for a nation<br />
richest<br />
conquered polio to permit pellagra and rockets?<br />
that<br />
Tom Wicker, THE NEW YORK TIMES, March 20 1969<br />
270
REFERENCES<br />
James and Walker, Evans. LET US NOW PRAISE FAMOUS MEN.<br />
Agee,<br />
Mifflin Company, c1939.<br />
Houghton<br />
Psychological Association. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 76th ANNUAL<br />
American<br />
1968. Volume 3. The Association, 1200 Seven-<br />
CONVENTION<br />
teenth N.W., Washington, D.C.<br />
Maxwell. WINTERSET. (In Representative American Plays,<br />
Anderson,<br />
H. Quinn, comp.) Appleton-Century-Crofts, c1953.<br />
A.<br />
of Rehabilitation Centers, Inc. SUPPORTIVE PERSONNEL<br />
Association<br />
REHABILITATION CENTERS. The Association in cooperation with<br />
IN<br />
Rehabilitation Research & Training Center, Pennsylvania<br />
Arkansas<br />
and Training Center. August 1967.<br />
Research<br />
AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MALCOLM X. Grove Press., c1964.<br />
Andrea, and Lurie, Jay. REPORT ON THE PREVALENCE OF DISABILITY<br />
Ayers,<br />
WASHINGTON STATE. Prepared under supervision of Jerald<br />
IN<br />
Director of Graduate Program for Vocational Rehabili-<br />
Forster,<br />
Counselors. University of Washington, Seattle. Septem-<br />
tation<br />
ber 1968.<br />
Jackson. OUR PRISONS ARE CRIMINAL. (In New York Times<br />
Bruce,<br />
September 22, 1968.)<br />
Maazine,<br />
Cairns, Fred I. PROGRESS IS UNORTHODOX. Boston, Beacon Press, c1950.<br />
Cleaver, Eldridge. SOUL ON ICE. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1968.<br />
of State Administrators Of Vocational Rehabilitation. THE<br />
Council<br />
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM LOOKS TO THE<br />
STATE-FEDERAL<br />
A STATEMENT OF MISSION AND GOALS. The Council , 1522<br />
FUTURE:<br />
Street, N.W,, Washington, D.C.n.d.<br />
K<br />
Martin. THE INCIDENCE OF DISABILITY IN MARYLAND. Univer-<br />
Dishart,<br />
of Maryland, College of Education, August 1967.<br />
sity<br />
Robert. HANDICAPPED AMERICANS. (In Consressional Records,<br />
Dole,<br />
14, 1969)<br />
April<br />
Kurt. ESCAPE FROM CONFINEMENT. (In Journal of Rehabili-<br />
Dreifuss,<br />
Vol. 35, No. i, January-February 1969)<br />
tation,<br />
H. Wentworth. TAMING MEGALOPOLIS. Volume II. How to<br />
Eldredge,<br />
an Urbanized World. Anchor Books. 1967.<br />
Manage<br />
272
Paul M., Jr., M.D. THE REHABILITATION-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX:<br />
Ellwood,<br />
A NEW REHABILITATION MARKET. The Donald Dabelstein<br />
TOWARD<br />
Lecture. 1968 NRA Conference. (In Journal of Rehabili-<br />
Memorial<br />
Vol. 35, No. 2, March-April 1969)<br />
tation,<br />
Daniel J. INAUGURAL ADDRESS. Delivered to the Forty-first<br />
Evans,<br />
in joint session. Olympia, Washington, January 15,<br />
Legislature<br />
1969.<br />
Gardner, John W. NO EASY VICTORIES. Harper & Row, c1968.<br />
Seymour. THE REFORM OF MENTAL HOSPITALS. (In Psychology<br />
Halleck,<br />
Vol. 2, No. i0, March 1969.)<br />
Today,<br />
Donald W. COOPERATIVE SCHOOL/REHABILITATION PROGRAMS.<br />
Hamilton,<br />
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, 1969.<br />
Typescript.<br />
Charles. THE DISCONTENT EXPLOSION IN MENTAL HEALTH. (In<br />
Hersch,<br />
Psy.cholo$ist, Vol. 23, No. 7, July 1968.)<br />
American<br />
Joseph. A DECADE OF PROGRESS. (In Journal of Rehab111tation,<br />
.Hunt,<br />
35, No. i, January-February 1969.)<br />
Vol.<br />
Donald R. ALTERNATIVES TO CONJUGAL VISITING. Typescript.<br />
Johns,<br />
Department of Institutions, Olympia, Washington, 1969.<br />
State<br />
County, Washington. Easter Seal Society. GUIDEBOOK TO SEATTLE<br />
King<br />
THE HANDICAPPED. Compiled and published by the Junior<br />
FOR<br />
of Seattle, Inc., in cooperation with the Society.<br />
League<br />
1966.<br />
Justus F. SEATTLE AREA STROKE PATIENT BED NEED. A<br />
Lehmann,<br />
medical program report. University of Washington 1968.<br />
Regional<br />
Oscar. LA VIDA: A PUER=]iT .I!ICAN FAMILY IN THE CULTURE OF<br />
Lewis,<br />
SAN JUAN AND NE Y(iIK. Random House, c1965.<br />
POVERTY<br />
Reuben J. COUNSELOR $ELF.-EXAMINATION AND CLIENT MOTIVA-<br />
Margolin,<br />
(In Professional Bulletin. Vol. VIII, January 1968.<br />
TION.<br />
National Rehabilitation Conseiing Association.)<br />
Walter S. WORK AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR. (In American Psychological<br />
Neff,<br />
Division 22 uiitin. Vol. 15, No. 3, November 1968.)<br />
Association<br />
Jersey. Department of !nstittions. POVERTY AND MENTAL RETAR-<br />
New<br />
A CAUSAL RELATIONSHiP By Rodger L. Hurley. Division<br />
DATION<br />
of Mental Retardation, !68<br />
Charles E. IMPROVING OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH COORDINATION.<br />
Odell,<br />
Journal of Rehabilitatien Vol. 35, No. 2, March-April 1969.)<br />
(In<br />
273
Comprehensive Statewide Planning for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Ohio.<br />
REPORT OF THE GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON VOCATIONAL REHABILI-<br />
Services.<br />
Bureau of Vocational Rehabilitation, Columbus, Ohio.<br />
TATION.<br />
1968.<br />
September<br />
Sylvia. "LATE START" PROGRAM COULD HELP ELDERLY. In Seattle<br />
Porter,<br />
August 21, 1968.)<br />
Post-Intelligencer,<br />
Commission for Observance of Human Rights Year (1968).<br />
President's<br />
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Article 23. The<br />
THE<br />
Commission, n.d.<br />
Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of<br />
President's<br />
THE CHALLENGE OF CRIME IN A FREE SOCIETY. The Commission,<br />
Justice.<br />
Washington, D.C. February 1967.<br />
THE NARCOTIC ADDICT. Report of Institute on New Devel-<br />
REHABILITATING<br />
in the Rehabilitation of the Narcotic Addict, Fort Worth,<br />
opments<br />
February 16-18, 1966. Sponsored jointly by the Division<br />
Texas,<br />
Hospitals of the U. S. Public Health, Service, Vocational<br />
of<br />
Rehabilitation Administration and Texas Christian University.<br />
Nan. DATA BANK: A THREAT TO YOUR PRIVACY? (In Sunday<br />
Robertson,<br />
York Times, January 7, 1968.)<br />
New<br />
Roosevelt, Franklin D. Second Bill of Rights. n.d.<br />
Howard A. INDUSTRIAL. ACCIDENTS. (InNewYorkTimes,.Septem-<br />
Rusk,<br />
i, 1968.)<br />
ber<br />
Edward E. A MODERN SISYPHUS GOES TO COLLEGE. Presented at<br />
Sampson,<br />
Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association,<br />
the<br />
San Francisco, California. September 1968.<br />
Clair (and others). RESEARCH METHODS IN SOCIAL RELATIONS.<br />
Selltiz,<br />
Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1959.<br />
Holt,<br />
William F. HIPPIE: BASTARD SON OF THE BEAT GENERATION, Joint<br />
Soskin,<br />
on Mental Health of Children, Inc., University of<br />
Commission<br />
California, Berkeley, December 1967.<br />
George R. NOT SO RICH AS YOU THINK. Boston, Houghton.Mifflin,<br />
Stewart,<br />
1968.<br />
Mary E. COORDINATION: A PROBLEM AND A PROMISE (In Journal<br />
Switzer,<br />
Rehabilitation, Vol. 35, No. 2, March-April 1969)<br />
of<br />
Thomas fHE CR!ME OF COMMITMENT, 6in PsychologyToday,<br />
$zasz,<br />
2, No. I0, March 1969.)<br />
Vol.<br />
274
Toiler, Ernst. SEVEN PLAYS. Liveright Publishing Corporation, c1934.<br />
S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Office of Education.<br />
U.<br />
YOUTH WE HAVEN'T SERVED A CHALLENGE TO VOCATIONAL EDUCATION.<br />
THE<br />
By Barbara Kemp. U. S. Government Printing Office, 1966.<br />
S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Social and<br />
U.<br />
Service.- Office of Research, Demonstrations,<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Training. RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATIONS BRIEFS: Vol. II,<br />
and<br />
6. Plastic surgery for public offenders, January 2, 1969;<br />
No.<br />
Vol. II, No. 8. Managing the information explosion,<br />
and<br />
3, 1969.<br />
February<br />
(State). Census Board. POPULATION FORECASTS: STATE OF<br />
Washington<br />
1965 to 1985. By Calvin F. Schmid (and others).<br />
WASHINGTON,<br />
Seattle, Washington, March 1965.<br />
(State). Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Civil<br />
Washington<br />
RACE AND VIOLENCE IN WASHINGTON STATE. Published by<br />
Disorder.<br />
Secretary of State, Olympia, Washington, 1969.<br />
(State). Department of Health. PROJECT REPORT: REHABILI-<br />
Washington<br />
EDUCATION SERVICE, January i, 1959 to December 31, 1961.<br />
TATION<br />
cooperative effort by the State Department of Health, Depart-<br />
A<br />
of Public Assistance, and the Division of Vocational Rehab-<br />
ment<br />
ilitation. Olympia, 1962.<br />
(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. 1,855<br />
Washington<br />
STORIES. An Annual Report. The Division, Olympia,<br />
SUCCESS<br />
Washington, 1968.<br />
(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. INTERIM<br />
Washington<br />
PLAN FOR WORKSHOPS AND FACILITIES, 1968. By Payson H.<br />
STATE<br />
Jeynes. The Division, September 1968.<br />
(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. SOCIAL<br />
Washington<br />
TRUST FUND PAYMENTS FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
SECURITY<br />
Prepared by Donald P. Holden. Typescript. The<br />
SERVICES.<br />
March 31, 1969.<br />
Division,<br />
(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Vocational<br />
Washington<br />
Outlook. Winter Issue, 1968.<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
(State). Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. WORKSHOP<br />
Washington<br />
OF PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES. The Division, 1968.<br />
MANUAL<br />
(State). GovernorVs Advisory Council on Urban Affairs.<br />
Washington<br />
WASHINGTON: APATHY OR ACTION? A report. Urban Affairs<br />
URBAN<br />
c/o Secretary of State, Legislative Building, Olympia,<br />
Council,<br />
1968.<br />
275
(State). Governor's Mental Health and Mental Retardation<br />
Washington<br />
Committee. EVERYBODY'S CHILDREN. A summary of Washing-<br />
Planning<br />
Comprehensive Plan to Help the Mentally Retarded. The<br />
ton's<br />
Olympia, 1966.<br />
Committee,<br />
(State). Governor's Task Force on Executive Organization.<br />
Washington<br />
TO GOVERNOR DANIEL J. EVANS. Brewster C. Denny, Chairman.<br />
REPORT<br />
The Committee, Olympia, 1968.<br />
(State). Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.<br />
Washington<br />
SURVEY OF THE STATUS AND NEEDS OF SECONDARY SPECIAL EDUCATION.<br />
A<br />
G. Newton Buker. Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction,<br />
By<br />
Capitol Building, Olympia, 1968.<br />
Old<br />
(State). Planning and Community Affairs Agency. NONWHITE<br />
Washington<br />
STATE OF WASHINGTON. By Calvin F. Schmid (and others).<br />
RACES,<br />
The Agency, Olympia, 1968.<br />
(State). State Legislature, Forty-First Regular Session,<br />
Washington<br />
HOUSE JOINT MEMORIAL NO. 9. By Representative John<br />
1969.<br />
"To the Honorable Richard M. Nixon, President of the<br />
Merrill.<br />
States, and to the Senate and House of Representatives<br />
United<br />
the United States of America, in Congress Assembled." This<br />
of<br />
a petition to Congress to enact legislation "expanding assis-<br />
is<br />
tance to solve the transportation needs of handicapped people."<br />
(State). Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
Washington<br />
DIRECTORY OF AGENCIES PROVIDING WORK TRAINING<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT IN WASHINGTON STATE. Developed<br />
AND/OR<br />
the University of Washington (Seattle) Rehabilitation<br />
under<br />
Education Program. Compiled by Charles Freeman,<br />
Counselor<br />
Fisher, Betty Marion, and Larry Paustian. Editorial<br />
Carolyn<br />
comments by Jerald R. Forster, Ph.D.<br />
.(State). Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
Washington<br />
REHABILITATION ADVANCE: PLANNING TO SERVE<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
HANDICAPPED AND DISADVANTAGED. ASummary. David C. Carson.<br />
THE<br />
Commission, 1969.<br />
The<br />
(State). Statewide Planning Commission for Vocational<br />
Washington<br />
REHABILITATION IN WASHINGTON STATE: PROGRAMS<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
BY STATE AGENCIES. David C. Carson, Eo M. Oliver and<br />
PROVIDED<br />
B. Welsh, Jr. The Commission, Olympia, 1968.<br />
John<br />
University. ROLE OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION IN COMMUN-<br />
Wisconsin.<br />
MENTAL HEALTH. Report of a conference, September 13-15<br />
ITY<br />
Madison, Wisconsin, under auspices of Wisconsin Psychia-<br />
1967,<br />
Institute University of Wisconsin and Rehabilitation<br />
tric<br />
Administration, Region V. Edited by Leigh M. Roberts.<br />
Services<br />
1968.<br />
The-University,<br />
276
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. FINAL REPORT<br />
Wisconsin.<br />
STATEWIDE PLANNING FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
COMPREHENSIVE<br />
SERVICES. The Division, 1968.<br />
Publications of the Rehabilitation Services Administration<br />
S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Rehabilitation<br />
U.<br />
Administration. U. S. Government Printing Office,<br />
Services<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
ANALYSIS OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR NONDISABLED<br />
AN<br />
PERSONS. Prepared by Division of Statistics and<br />
DISADVANTAGED<br />
the Administration, Washington, D.C. Reprinted by<br />
Studies<br />
Council for Occupational Education, Division of<br />
Coordinating<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation, Olympia, Washington, 1968.<br />
STATISTICS STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCIES:<br />
CASELOAD<br />
1968.<br />
INTRODUCTION TO THE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROCESS; A<br />
AN<br />
MANUAL. By John F. McGowan and Thomas L. Porter.<br />
TRAINING<br />
Revised July 1967.<br />
OF THE ALCOHOLIC: A REPORT FROM THE STUDY GROUP<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
REHABILITATION OF THE ALCOHOLIC AND PUBLIC OFFENDER. Sixth<br />
ON<br />
on Rehabilitation Services, May 20-22, 1968, University<br />
Institute<br />
Pennsylvania.<br />
Park,<br />
OF THE PUBLIC OFFENDER. Fifth Institute on<br />
REHABILITATION<br />
Services, May 22-25, 1967, Madison, Wisconsin.<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AGENCY PROGRAM DATA FISCAL<br />
STATE.<br />
1967.<br />
YEAR<br />
277
APPENDICES<br />
278
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
0<br />
280<br />
rO<br />
0<br />
APPENDIX A<br />
o
CHAIRMEN OF REGIONAL COMMITTEES<br />
Mr. Herb Altschull Region I Seattle<br />
.Mr. Rodney A. Boddington Region II Sultan<br />
William N. Paris<br />
Mr.<br />
D. Murray Mason<br />
Mr.<br />
III Longview<br />
Region<br />
III Longview<br />
Region<br />
Mrs. Sherman Pinto Region IV Tacoma<br />
The Honorable Robert D. McDougall Region V Wenatchee<br />
The Honorable Marjorie Lynch Region VI Yakima<br />
Helen Powers<br />
Mrs.<br />
Raymond Raschko<br />
Mr.<br />
Vll Spokane<br />
Region<br />
VII Spokane<br />
Region<br />
Mr. Roger C. Larson Region VIII Pullman<br />
282<br />
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Commission and staff are greatly indebted to these advisory<br />
The<br />
many of whose members met numerous times to study needs,<br />
committees,<br />
problems, consider proposals and work out pocedures. Their<br />
identify<br />
efforts are reflected at many points in this report.<br />
dedicated<br />
sincere appreciation is also expressed to those many con-<br />
Our<br />
citizens who attended the series of local hearings and study<br />
cerned<br />
throughout the state to express the needs of the disabled and<br />
sessions<br />
contribute their thinking toward solutions.<br />
to<br />
Forster, Ph.D.,<br />
Jerald<br />
Seattle<br />
Chairman,<br />
Grindrod, Seattle<br />
Edward<br />
R. Erickson, Seattle<br />
Dennis<br />
H. P. Hall, Seattle<br />
J.<br />
Martha MacFarlane, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
J. Goleeke,<br />
William<br />
Seattle<br />
Chairman,<br />
Helen Mickelsen,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Seattle<br />
Co-chairman,<br />
C. Betz, Co-chairman,<br />
Roger<br />
Seattle<br />
Settle, Seattle<br />
Kenneth<br />
D. Powell, Seattle<br />
Robert<br />
J. Rhodes, Ph.D.,<br />
Robert<br />
Seattle<br />
M. Hudson, Seattle<br />
Richard<br />
J. Whitmore, M.D.,<br />
Janet<br />
Seattle<br />
James Osborn, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Robert V. Schembs,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Issaquah<br />
ADVISORY COMMITTEES<br />
TASK FORCE I REGION I KING COUNTY<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
Constance Carter, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
S. Lane, Vashon<br />
William<br />
Helen A. Hanson, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
R. Sparkman, M.D., Seattle<br />
Donal<br />
Carl L. Marrs, Redmond<br />
TASK FORCE II REGION I KING COUNTY<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
283<br />
W. Carter, Seattle<br />
Randolph<br />
G. Russell, Seattle<br />
Douglas<br />
Beryl Gridley, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
W. Baker, Bremerton<br />
Robert<br />
H. Jeynes, Olympia<br />
Payson<br />
Holly T. Day, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Arwine, Seattle<br />
Russ<br />
Jacobson, Bellevue<br />
Albert<br />
A. E. Naess, Jr., Seattle<br />
J.<br />
A. Mehas, Seattle<br />
Arthur<br />
Blanche Wolman, Edmonds<br />
Ms.<br />
Nathanson, Kirkland<br />
Phil<br />
Kay Plumb, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
Walkama, Seattle<br />
William
E. Unti, Chairman,<br />
William<br />
Seattle<br />
TASK FORCE III REGION I KING COUNTY<br />
Lewellen, Seattle<br />
Dwayne<br />
Blanche Causey, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
Sweetser, Seattle<br />
Jack<br />
D. Stanley, Seattle<br />
Dayton<br />
Frances Taylor, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Rose Lee, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
S. Sampson, Seattle<br />
Miles<br />
W. Abbott, Seattle<br />
Chauncy<br />
L. Eastly, Seattle<br />
Leonard<br />
Elizabeth Benedict,<br />
Miss<br />
Seattle<br />
Dorothy Bostrom, Seattle<br />
Miss<br />
Harold Fish, Seattle<br />
Palmer, Ph.D.,<br />
Densley<br />
Seattle<br />
Chairman,<br />
Cecile Lindquist,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Seattle<br />
Co-chairman,<br />
Bette King, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
W. Taylor, Auburn<br />
Harold<br />
Holman, Auburn<br />
Hayes<br />
MacDonald, Seattle<br />
Carl<br />
J. Straka, Kent<br />
Thomas<br />
Anne Milner, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
John Milner, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Howard, Seattle<br />
Roy<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
Josephine Bates, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
Mineo Katagiri, Seattle<br />
Rev.<br />
Thibaudeau, Seattle<br />
Roger<br />
Gladys Kirk, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
Claypool, Seattle<br />
Paul<br />
H. Kennedy, Seattle<br />
Elmer<br />
Cobb, Seattle<br />
Mrs.Marguerite<br />
E. Cole, M.D., Seattle<br />
Robert<br />
Bigelow, Seattle<br />
John<br />
Johnson, Seattle<br />
Frank<br />
Adolph Gruhn, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Jan Twight, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
D. Ford, Bellevue<br />
Loren<br />
R. Cornell, Seattle<br />
Gary<br />
Percy B. Bell, Seattle<br />
TASK FORCE IV REGION I KING COUNTY<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
V. Low, Bellevue<br />
Cecil<br />
Aurora Temple, Seattle<br />
Ms.<br />
Mrs. Tusguo Ikeda, Seattle<br />
S. Leckenby, Seattle<br />
William<br />
O...Stewart, Seattle<br />
Louis<br />
John Bakke, Kirkland<br />
Mrs.<br />
DeBell, Bellevue<br />
George<br />
J. Schierberl, Seattle<br />
Edward<br />
Pattison, Seattle<br />
Warren<br />
Marian Hedgecock, Seattle<br />
Miss<br />
R. Dunham, Seattle<br />
Jerome<br />
T. Spencer, Seattle<br />
John<br />
G. Olsen, Seattle<br />
Jack<br />
Puckett, Seattle<br />
Gordon<br />
Wilson, Seattle<br />
Lloyd<br />
A. Allan, Ed.D., Midway<br />
M.<br />
L. C. Hoover, Edmonds<br />
Dr.<br />
Phillip Heggen, Seattle<br />
TASK FORCE V REGION I KING COUNTY<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
Johnson, Chairman,<br />
Charles<br />
Seattle<br />
Donald Brazier, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Carol DeVry, Seattle<br />
Miss<br />
Hayashi, Auburn<br />
Richard<br />
Myla Koch, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Raklios, Seattle<br />
John<br />
D. Smith, Federal Way<br />
Vincent<br />
284<br />
Steinberg, Seattle<br />
Herb<br />
Stricker, Bellevue<br />
Gus<br />
Taft, Seattle<br />
William<br />
Evans Wyckoff, Seattle<br />
Mrs.<br />
Stolov, M.D., Seattle<br />
Walter<br />
Pontius, Seattle<br />
Lester<br />
Silverman,M.D., Seattle<br />
Donald<br />
Arland Bratnold, Seattle<br />
Mrs.
TASK FORCE I REGION II<br />
ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />
CLALLAM,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
WHATCOM<br />
Patterson, Co-chairman,<br />
Mark<br />
Everett<br />
Gilmore, Ph.D.,<br />
Harold<br />
Everett<br />
Co-chairman,<br />
Hazel Venables, Everett<br />
Mrs.<br />
Beryl Manley, Everett<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wirt, Monroe<br />
Robert<br />
L. Miller, Bellingham<br />
Keith<br />
Kanarr, Port Townsend<br />
John<br />
Buse, Marysville<br />
August<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
Hugh Cantelon, Bellingham<br />
Rev.<br />
Verna Frees, Edmonds<br />
Mrs.<br />
Alice White, Chimacum<br />
Ms.<br />
Dignum, Port Townsend<br />
Daine<br />
Trudi Heffern, Mt. Vernon<br />
Ms.<br />
F. Rodenberga, Mukilteo<br />
Robert<br />
H. Merritt, Mt. Vernon<br />
Robert<br />
C. Studry, Mt. Vernon<br />
N.<br />
Mrs. Helen Pemberton, Port Angeles<br />
TASK FORCE II REGION II<br />
ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN' SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />
CLALLAM,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
WHATCOM<br />
Jacobsen, Co-chairman,<br />
Carl<br />
Everett<br />
Hatch, Co-chairman<br />
Michael<br />
Lynnwood<br />
Olson, Bellingham<br />
Charles<br />
F. Thompson, Ph.D.,<br />
E.<br />
Woolley<br />
Sedro<br />
Shirley Benke,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Terrace<br />
Mountlake<br />
Gladys Eckhart, Edmonds<br />
Ms.<br />
Ms. Reda E. Albright, Bellingham<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
K. Fort, Mt. Vernon<br />
Richard<br />
H. Holmes, Marysville<br />
C.<br />
Ruthruff, Port Angeles<br />
Harold<br />
G. Thorlakson, Mt. Vernon<br />
Richard<br />
E. Harris, Anacortes<br />
Roy<br />
Donat, Mt. Vernon<br />
Dan<br />
Frasier, Oak Harbor<br />
George<br />
L. White, Everett<br />
Allan<br />
E. Sharp, Mt. Vernon<br />
John<br />
Wrobel, Burlington<br />
Charles<br />
Strong, Burlington<br />
Adrian<br />
Eggert, Bellingham<br />
Marvin<br />
TASK FORCE III REGION II<br />
ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />
CLALLAM,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
WHATCOM<br />
D. White, Chairman,<br />
Charles<br />
Olympia<br />
H. Ostling, Co-chairman,<br />
Edward<br />
Everett<br />
J. Bourns, Bellingham<br />
B.<br />
A. Elmore, Monroe<br />
R.<br />
R. Truax, Mr. Vernon<br />
W.<br />
F. Feldmann, Bellingham<br />
Lester<br />
Earnest D. Byers, Everett<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
285<br />
W. Ford, Anacortes<br />
Jesse<br />
Bernice Duvall, Mt. Vernon<br />
Mrs.<br />
Vera Hays, Bellingham<br />
Mrs.<br />
Margaret DeBore, Alderwood Manor<br />
Mrs.<br />
J. Dodson, Snohomish<br />
Robert<br />
M. Quaranta, Everett<br />
Joe<br />
Clifford Anderson, Everett<br />
Dr.<br />
Thompson, Ph.D., Sedro Woolley<br />
Fred
TASK FORCE IV REGION II<br />
ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />
CLALLAM,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
WHATCOM<br />
Engman, Chairman,<br />
Kenneth<br />
Everett<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
Clement, Co-chairman,<br />
William<br />
Bellingham<br />
Pruiett, Mt. Vernon<br />
Ray<br />
Smith, Bellingham<br />
Ray<br />
Pierce, Mt. Vernon<br />
Vernon<br />
Leathers, Mt. Vernon<br />
Sam<br />
Langenhorst, Mt. Vernon<br />
Hubert<br />
Pittman, Mt. Vernon<br />
Robert<br />
Ernie Fox, Monroe<br />
TASK FORCE V REGION II<br />
Ludwick, Mukilteo<br />
Ernie<br />
Edith Wicker, Sedro Woolley<br />
Mrs.<br />
Libby Matthias, Everett<br />
Ms.<br />
Wilma Smith, Burlington<br />
Ms.<br />
Vera Fuhrman, Mountlake Terrace<br />
Ms.<br />
Bliss, Bellingham<br />
Ed<br />
Anna Cowles, Lake Stevens<br />
Mrs.<br />
Ednis Dunbar, Port Townsend<br />
Miss<br />
ISLAND, JEFFERSON, SAN JUAN, SKAGIT, SNOHOMISH, AND<br />
CLALLAM,<br />
COUNTIES.<br />
WHATCOM<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
Carle, Chairman,<br />
Harry<br />
Everett<br />
Farnham, Everett<br />
L.<br />
Holmes, Port Townsend<br />
John<br />
Lucille Jones,<br />
Ms.<br />
Woodinville<br />
TASK FORCE I REGION III<br />
E. Sternberg, Seattle<br />
Louis<br />
Evelyn M. Hylton, Olympia<br />
Ms.<br />
Mary Long, Lynnwood<br />
Mrs.<br />
Grace Hunter, Edmonds<br />
Ms.<br />
CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />
Foley, Longview<br />
Ray<br />
A. Johnson, Longview<br />
Joe<br />
Dean Gregorius, Longview<br />
J.<br />
Gennette, Kelso<br />
Tom<br />
Betty Jones, Chehalis<br />
Mrs.<br />
Marilyn Hoehne, Longview<br />
Mrs.<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
286<br />
Betty Steinke, Vancouver<br />
Mrs.<br />
Leone Sunderland, Longview<br />
Ms.<br />
Ruth Ford, Longview<br />
Ms.<br />
M. Woodworth, Vancouver<br />
Lionel<br />
Mr. Marshall Fernandez, Camas
TASK FORCE II REGION III<br />
CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />
& Mrs. James Gould,.<br />
Mr.<br />
Vancouver<br />
Co-chairmen,<br />
Thoreson, Centralia<br />
Jerry<br />
Joe Dixon, Vancouver<br />
Mrs.<br />
Duke, Vancouver<br />
Fred<br />
C. Smith, Vancouver<br />
Ray<br />
& Mrs. Edward E..Staley,<br />
Mr.<br />
Vancouver<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
White, Portland<br />
Floyd<br />
Jeynes, Olympia<br />
Payson<br />
& Mrs. Glen R. Hull,<br />
Mr.<br />
Chehalis<br />
Doris Johnston, Centralia<br />
Ms.<br />
Mary I. Robinson, Centralia<br />
Ms.<br />
Mary Lou Harris, Chehalis<br />
Mrs.<br />
Nadine Williams, Longview<br />
Ms.<br />
TASK FORCE III REGION III<br />
CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />
Tegarden, Chairman,<br />
Donald<br />
Kelso<br />
Tinker, Longview<br />
William<br />
H. Horne, Longview<br />
Harold<br />
Dusenbery, Vancouver<br />
Harris<br />
Bonnie Easley, Longview<br />
Ms.<br />
C. Hall, Longview<br />
Herb<br />
Peterson, Kelso<br />
Wesley<br />
E. Hoehne, Longview<br />
Mark<br />
Holloman, Chehalis<br />
David<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
Mary W. Silk, Vancouver<br />
Mrs.<br />
Linda Miller, Vancouver<br />
Miss<br />
Steffen, Vancouver<br />
Daryle<br />
Cooper, Toutle<br />
Bob<br />
Martin Lee, Castle Rock<br />
Rev.<br />
B. McFadden, Stevenson<br />
C.<br />
Howard Murphy, Wahkiakum County<br />
Mrs.<br />
Druschel, Skamania County<br />
Floyd<br />
Richard Adlard, Skamania County<br />
I.<br />
Esther Lines, Chehalis<br />
Miss<br />
TASK FORCE IV REGION III<br />
CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
Tucker, Chairman,<br />
William<br />
Edmonds<br />
Virgil W. Epperson,<br />
Dr.<br />
Vancouver<br />
R. Kelly, Vancouver<br />
Hobart<br />
Orpha Christianson,<br />
Ms.<br />
Longview<br />
M. Josephine Moore,<br />
Mr.<br />
Longview<br />
287<br />
R. Martinson, Chehalis<br />
Luddy<br />
R. Spagen, Chehalis<br />
David<br />
Virginia Champion, Camas<br />
Mrs.<br />
C. L. Bauer, Vancouver<br />
Mrs.<br />
Agar, Stevenson<br />
Dennis<br />
Toews, Longview<br />
Harry
TASK FORCE V REGION III<br />
CLARK, COWLITZ, LEWIS, SKAMANIA, AND WAHKIAKUM COUNTIES<br />
Berhow, Chairman,<br />
Byron<br />
Vancouver<br />
Wever, Napavine<br />
Rick<br />
S. Allen, Centralia<br />
Hugh<br />
Mary Ellen Trostad,<br />
Ms.<br />
Longview<br />
Elizabeth Meharg,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Kelso<br />
Barbara M. Walker,<br />
Ms.<br />
Vancouver<br />
Dale P. Burr, Vancouver<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
TASK FORCE I REGION IV<br />
F. McDonnell, Vancouver<br />
J.<br />
Marie C. Lloyd, Vancouver<br />
Ms.<br />
H. Gorton M.D., Kelso<br />
S.<br />
D. Quant, Chehalis<br />
R.<br />
Betty Horne, Longview<br />
Mrs.<br />
W. Schafer, Chehalis<br />
Marvin<br />
J. C. Aitchison, Washougal<br />
GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THIDRSTON COUNTIES<br />
Johns, Ph.D.,<br />
Donald<br />
Olympia<br />
Chairman,<br />
Peach, Tacoma<br />
Tom<br />
Oliver, Tacoma<br />
Joe<br />
Sam Ebinger, Shelton<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
TASK FORCE II REGION IV<br />
N. Weaver, Olympia<br />
William<br />
Genevieve Bruggerman, Olympia<br />
Ms.<br />
Hindman, Aberdeen<br />
George<br />
Ross, Tacoma<br />
Lawrence<br />
Mrs. GeorgeGilman, Tacoma<br />
GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />
Shields, Chairman,<br />
Doyle<br />
Olympia<br />
C. Flowers, Olympia<br />
Clarence<br />
R. Nelson, Gig<br />
Dolaine<br />
Harbor<br />
Abbie Meach, Olympia<br />
Mrs.<br />
Florence Swope,<br />
Ms.<br />
Bremerton<br />
Flanagan, Lacey<br />
Warren<br />
Fred V. Russell,<br />
Captain<br />
Bremerton<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
288<br />
Acklin York, Silverdale<br />
Mrs.<br />
Jan Loutzenhiser, Olympia<br />
Mrs.<br />
Johnson, Olympia<br />
Norman<br />
Gibbs, Aberdeen<br />
Mrs.<br />
Weber, Ocean Shores<br />
Richard<br />
McElvain, Tumwater<br />
Lloyd<br />
G. Walker, Tacoma<br />
Herman<br />
Nelson, Olympia<br />
Atley<br />
Gentry, Tacoma<br />
James<br />
Jeynes, Olympia<br />
PaysonH.
TASK FORCE III REGION IV<br />
GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />
Meurer, Chairman,<br />
Jack<br />
Olympia<br />
Blanche Griswold,<br />
Ms.<br />
Bremerton<br />
Alice I. Helenius,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Olympia<br />
R. McDougall,<br />
Gordon<br />
Tacoma<br />
P. Holden, Olympia<br />
Donald<br />
Ruth R. Kane,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Steilacoom<br />
Lenore Simonsen,<br />
Ms.<br />
Bremerton<br />
Laukkanen, Aberdeen<br />
Ron<br />
Paul Ellis, Ph.D., Olympia<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
TASK FORCE IV REGION IV<br />
Eleanor Brown, Bremerton<br />
Ms.<br />
P. FQrd, Ed.D., Tacoma<br />
Thornton<br />
Mantz, Shelton<br />
Bud<br />
Adams, Tacoma<br />
Charles<br />
J. Larsen, Seattle<br />
Ervin<br />
Norton, Renton<br />
John<br />
Jean Gay, Aberdeen<br />
Ms.<br />
W. Mears, Bremerton<br />
Robert<br />
W. Mourray, Tumwater<br />
L.<br />
G. Lloyd, Olalla<br />
Robert<br />
Evelyn Wright, Bremerton<br />
Ms.<br />
Alice Sandvick, Bremerton<br />
Ms.<br />
Carol Hazelrigg, Tacoma<br />
Ms.<br />
Hazel A. Hestley, Bremerton<br />
Ms.<br />
Ms. Shirley Atwater, Bremerton<br />
GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
H. Thoemke, Chairman,<br />
Wallace<br />
Olympia<br />
L. Geyer, Tacoma<br />
Virgil<br />
Donna Baurickter,<br />
Ms.<br />
Puyallup<br />
Fred Miner, Lakewood<br />
Dr.<br />
Center<br />
D. Williams, Ed.D.,<br />
Robert<br />
Bremerton<br />
Irons, Bremerton<br />
Joe<br />
Murphy, Tacoma<br />
John<br />
Brennan, Tacoma<br />
Bruce<br />
M. Gramann, Spanaway<br />
Fred<br />
Carl Stegman, Tacoma<br />
W.<br />
Spilseth, Shelton<br />
Ray<br />
Margaret Howland,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Bremerton<br />
Nolt, Tacoma<br />
Roy<br />
Baird, Tacoma<br />
Ralph<br />
Eva Katzenberger,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Bremerton<br />
289<br />
Dorothy C. Asplund, Olympia<br />
Miss<br />
Jean Olds, Tacoma<br />
Miss<br />
L. Pederson, Aberdeen<br />
Fred<br />
L. Switzer, Tacoma<br />
R.<br />
B. Kluge, Tacoma<br />
Karl<br />
George Warren, Olympia<br />
F.<br />
O. Ireland, Buckley<br />
John<br />
Ellingson, Ph.D., Gig Harbor<br />
Floyd<br />
M. Goodpaster, Shelton<br />
J.<br />
J. Orlando, Tacoma<br />
Robert<br />
Helena G. Adamson, Olympia<br />
Mrs.<br />
Willmarth, Olympia<br />
John<br />
Solvang, Tacoma<br />
Paul<br />
S. Hooper, Bremerton<br />
E.<br />
J. Robinson, Bremerton<br />
M.<br />
L. S. Lewis, Tacoma<br />
Mrs.<br />
Gustafson, Tacoma<br />
Frank<br />
Hamlette, Olympia<br />
Clyde<br />
Catherine Dana, Olympia<br />
Miss<br />
Jacob, Olympia<br />
Sam<br />
Mrs. V. Ringe!, Tacoma
TASK FORCE V REGION IV<br />
GRAYS HARBOR, KITSAP, MASON, PACIFIC, PIERCE, AND THURSTON COUNTIES<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
Johnson, Chairman,<br />
Bruce<br />
Olympia<br />
L. Lee, Tacoma<br />
Clarence<br />
A. Price, Olympia<br />
Cecil<br />
Jo Anderson, Ph.D.,<br />
Frederic<br />
Tacoma<br />
Leo E. Schmiege, Shelton<br />
TASK FORCE I REGION V<br />
Bernard Saibel, Olympia<br />
Dr.<br />
Auseth, Shelton<br />
Martin<br />
Beals, Tacoma<br />
Crowell<br />
R. Lazare, Tacoma<br />
Daniel<br />
William Buell, Tacoma<br />
CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />
John McCaw, Chairman,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
East<br />
Florence Holterhoff,<br />
Ms.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
H. Anderson, Coulee<br />
Elmer<br />
Dam<br />
L. Krens, 0kanogan<br />
Larry<br />
L. Prewitt,<br />
Robert<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Schafer, Wenatchee<br />
David<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
TASK FORCE II REGION V<br />
Harry D. Hunter, Wenatchee<br />
Dr.<br />
W. Woods, Wenatchee<br />
Robert<br />
Kloes, Wenatchee<br />
Harold<br />
C. Schoeneman, Wenatchee<br />
E.<br />
Maude Craven, East<br />
Ms.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
A. A. Morrison, Wenatchee<br />
CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />
Henry Struck, Chairman,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
East<br />
Andrist, Omak<br />
John<br />
Grubich, Wenatchee<br />
Nick<br />
Wagner, Coulee Dam<br />
Joseph<br />
Barbara Starkey,<br />
Ms.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
290<br />
Penfold, Wenatchee<br />
Jess<br />
R. Kingston, Wenatchee<br />
George<br />
Allen, Wenatchee<br />
Kenneth<br />
Craven, Wenatchee<br />
Lev<br />
Payson H. Jeynes, Olympia
Eleanor N. Snyder,<br />
Dr.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Chairman,<br />
Carolyn Warman,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Co-chairman,<br />
& Mrs. Win Baker,<br />
Mr.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
L. J. Schoentrup,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Co F. McNeal,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Carol K. Anderson,<br />
Miss<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Milne, Chairman,<br />
AI<br />
Cashmere<br />
TASK FORCE III REGION V<br />
CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
TASK FORCE IV REGION V<br />
Joan Erickson, Wenatchee<br />
Mrs.<br />
Meredith arris, Entiat<br />
Mrs.<br />
Hartley, Wenatchee<br />
Robert<br />
Larson, Wenatchee<br />
Howard<br />
Kuntz, Wenatchee<br />
Mrs.Frank<br />
Stanford, Wenatchee<br />
Glenn<br />
Hood, Cashmere<br />
Bill<br />
Bradford, Wenatchee<br />
Robert<br />
V. Ramsey, Wenatchee<br />
Clyde<br />
Dan McMonagle, Wenatchee<br />
Mrs.<br />
Mrs. Barbara Bonifaci, Wenatchee<br />
CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
A. Bauer, Co-chairman,<br />
Henry<br />
Wenatchee<br />
V. Breckenridge,<br />
L.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Wardle, Wenatchee<br />
Wayne<br />
Eva Anderson,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Frances B. Stanton,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Waterville<br />
TASK FORCE V REGION V<br />
Lee, Wenatchee<br />
Vance<br />
G. Campbell, Wenatchee<br />
Donald<br />
Shirley R. Bossen, Wenatchee<br />
Ms.<br />
AdelineConner, Wenatchee<br />
Mrs.<br />
Pauline Isaminger, Wenatchee<br />
Mrs.<br />
Clark, Omak<br />
Foster<br />
Schmidt, Omak<br />
Wayne<br />
Eller, Wenatchee<br />
Jay<br />
James E. Moran, Wenatchee<br />
CHELAN, DOUGLAS, AND OKANOGAN COUNTIES<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
Hedeen, Chairman,<br />
Gerald<br />
Wenatchee<br />
East<br />
Richardson, Wenatchee<br />
Claude<br />
C. T. Cedergreen,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wenatchee<br />
Madland, Wenatchee<br />
Mike<br />
291<br />
Eugene E. Gnagy, Wenatchee<br />
Rev.<br />
C. Kuchenreuther, Wenatchee<br />
I.<br />
Curtis, East Wenatchee<br />
Bob<br />
W. Bryant, Wenatchee<br />
Harley<br />
George, Orondo<br />
Myrl<br />
Avery, Wenatchee<br />
Warren<br />
Kirby Billingsley, Wenatchee
F. Redmond, Ph.D.,<br />
John<br />
Yakima<br />
TASK FORCE I REGION VI<br />
KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />
Marchant, Grandview<br />
Lonnie<br />
Follett, Yakima<br />
Don<br />
H. Foster, Yakima<br />
Keith<br />
M. Hayden, Yakima<br />
Paul<br />
G. A. Dierdorff,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Sunnyside<br />
Jeannette S. Johnson,<br />
Ms.<br />
Richland<br />
A. Porter, Ellensburg<br />
Durward<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
TASK FORCE II REGION Vl<br />
Helen E. Peterson, Yakima<br />
Ms.<br />
Eleanor Heffernan, Yakima<br />
Ms.<br />
C. Smith, akima<br />
Don<br />
Stanley Coffin, Yakima<br />
Mrs.<br />
N. Dickinsen, Yakima<br />
Neil.<br />
Conrad, Yakima<br />
Les<br />
Cliff Onsgard, Grandview<br />
KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />
Cook, Chairman, Yakima<br />
Rene<br />
Coppers, Co-chairman,<br />
Bud<br />
Yakima<br />
C. Van Rooy, Yakima<br />
Donald<br />
H. Jeynes, Olympia<br />
Payson<br />
Seago, Yakima<br />
Carl<br />
Roy Brown, Yakima<br />
J.<br />
Dwarshuis, Yakima<br />
Fred<br />
Kathryn Safford, Selah<br />
Miss<br />
J. Rolstad, Yakima<br />
Donald<br />
Boley, Chairman,<br />
Jack<br />
Yakima<br />
Mary Wingate, Yakima<br />
Mrs.<br />
Smith, Yakima<br />
Horace<br />
Pat Erickson,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Ellensburg<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
TASK FORCE III " REGION Vl<br />
L. LaDue, Ellensburg<br />
Walter<br />
Nancy Mears, Mabton<br />
Mrs.<br />
Audrey Bontrager, Yakima<br />
Ms.<br />
Staley, Toppenish<br />
LeRoy<br />
Betty Brunner, Ellensburg<br />
Ms.<br />
Marie Cross, Yakima<br />
Ms.<br />
D. Bennett, Yakima<br />
Earle<br />
Leland S. Harris, Yakima<br />
Dr.<br />
S. Buckman, Yakima<br />
H.<br />
Ruth Adams, Yakima<br />
Ms.<br />
KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />
Catherine Brown, Selah<br />
Miss<br />
H. Hendricks, Yakima<br />
LaVar<br />
S. Barnard, Sunnyside<br />
W.<br />
C. Werner, Yakima<br />
Hubert<br />
Garret Horsley, Wapato<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
292<br />
Fram, Selah<br />
Joseph<br />
E. Baldwin, Toppenish<br />
Charles<br />
Ingalsbe, Yakima<br />
Bliss<br />
A. Clarke, Yakima<br />
RoBert<br />
J. Megivern, Toppenish<br />
Richard.<br />
L. Wilson, Ellensburg<br />
Kenneth<br />
Louise M. Murdock, Goldendale<br />
Ms.<br />
O. Field, Yakima<br />
Edward<br />
P. Smith, Yakima<br />
Stanley<br />
Swenson, Yakima<br />
Bill
Wilson, Chairman,<br />
John<br />
Yakima<br />
Knutsen, Grandview<br />
Earl<br />
A. 0'Reilly, Yakima<br />
H.<br />
TASK FORCE IV REGION VI<br />
KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
S. Henderson, Ellensburg<br />
Hyrum<br />
Effie Mae Lofgren,<br />
Ms.<br />
Goldendale<br />
Bunnell, Yakima<br />
Marion<br />
Driscoll, Yakima<br />
Lee<br />
Gannon, Wapato<br />
Harlan<br />
Blaine C. Hardy, Wapato<br />
TASK FORCE V REGION VI<br />
Cope, Yakima<br />
Wesley<br />
Jaquysh, Yakima<br />
William<br />
V. Lombardi, Union Gap<br />
George<br />
Mamie Morrison, Yakima<br />
Mrs.<br />
Friedline, Jr., Yakima<br />
Martin<br />
Frye, Ed.D., Ellensburg<br />
Ronald<br />
McDowell, Yakima<br />
Don<br />
Mould, Yakima<br />
Richard<br />
Zehr, Yakima<br />
Les<br />
Corless, Sunnyside<br />
Bob<br />
KITTITAS, KLICKITAT, AND YAKIMA COUNTIES<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
W. Scott, Sr.,<br />
James<br />
Yakima<br />
Chairman,<br />
Knowles, Co-chairman,<br />
Clayton<br />
Yakima<br />
F. Naumann, Ph.D., Ellensburg<br />
T.<br />
Joy, Yakima<br />
Mel<br />
C. Griffith, Yakima<br />
Harold<br />
Kass, Yakima<br />
Ted<br />
Lindgren, Yakima<br />
Olaf<br />
Wilson, Yakima<br />
Mort<br />
Wehde, Yakima<br />
Fred<br />
Hoshauer, Yakima<br />
Dan<br />
Carter, Yakima<br />
Don<br />
Davis, Yakima<br />
Hugh<br />
James Nolan, Yakima<br />
TASK FORCE I REGION VII<br />
FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />
ADAMS,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
STEVENS<br />
Abey, Chairman, Spokane<br />
Les<br />
Priebe, Co-chairman,<br />
Melcher<br />
Spokane<br />
R. Francisco, Spokane<br />
Barney<br />
Dr. Donald C. Scott, Spokane<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
293<br />
Florence Hansen, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
Jeanne Gladder, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
Milan<br />
Charles-Jasper,<br />
B. Craig, M.D., Spokane<br />
Arthur
TASK FORCE II REGION Vll<br />
FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />
ADAMS,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
STEVENS<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
Maxene Freeman, Chairman,<br />
Miss<br />
Spokane<br />
Dunning, Co-chairman,-<br />
Arthur<br />
Spokane<br />
R. Slavens, Spokane<br />
Morris<br />
Messerschmidt, Ph.D.,<br />
Ramona<br />
Spokane<br />
R. Graybeal, Olympia<br />
Earl<br />
Robert Burdick, Spokane<br />
C.<br />
W. Harris, M.D., Spokane<br />
Milo<br />
Hester Hutsinpiller, Spokane<br />
Mary Ann Jhnson, Spokane<br />
Ms.<br />
Higgins, Spokane<br />
Charles<br />
Judge, Spokane<br />
Thomas<br />
W LaMunyon, Spokane<br />
W.<br />
W. Emerson, Spokane<br />
Van<br />
Runberg, Spokane<br />
Ted<br />
Max Taylor, Spokane<br />
TASK FORCE III REGION VII<br />
FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />
ADAMS,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
STEVENS<br />
Olmstead, Chairman,<br />
Vernon<br />
Spokane<br />
Goodwin, Co-chairman,<br />
Robert<br />
Spokane<br />
L. Gerla, Deer Park<br />
Benjamin<br />
Charneski, Spokane<br />
Larry<br />
Coyle, Spokane<br />
Dan<br />
Ruby Dubois, Colville<br />
Ms.<br />
H. L. Bunch, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
Eleanor Clifton, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
TASK FORCE IV REGION Vll<br />
Helen Stensgaard, Spokane<br />
Ms.<br />
Dorothy Matthews, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
Gertrude A. Ray, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
Robert Hanson, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
T. Freeman, Spokane<br />
Clarence<br />
Gerald Fallgren, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
FERRY, GRANT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />
ADAMS,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
STEVENS<br />
Snider, Chairman,<br />
James<br />
Spokane<br />
McKenzie, Co-chairman,<br />
Alex<br />
Spokane<br />
C. J. Mueller, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
Flory, Spokane<br />
Jack<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
Hutsell, Spokane<br />
Robert<br />
Eleanor Peterson, Spokane<br />
Ms.<br />
L. Purdy, Spokane<br />
J.<br />
G. Minord, Spokane<br />
L.<br />
294<br />
O. Adams, M.D., Spokane<br />
Alfred<br />
H. Manzer, Deer Park<br />
Lewis<br />
Jessie L. Webb, Colville<br />
Mrs.<br />
L. Harris, Spokane<br />
Eugene<br />
Van Wey, Spokane<br />
Hank<br />
L. Hodin, Spokane<br />
Lillian<br />
Esther Zurbrugg, Spokane<br />
Ms.<br />
R. LaCasse, Spokane<br />
Mrs.
TASK FORCE V REGION Vll<br />
FERRY, GPT, LINCOLN, PEND OREILLE, SPOKANE, AND<br />
ADAMS,<br />
COUNTIES<br />
STEVENS<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
McCarthy, Chairman,<br />
Charles<br />
Spokane<br />
Hammond, Spokane<br />
Paul<br />
Moyer, Spokane<br />
Michael<br />
McKie, Spokane<br />
Clair<br />
W. Brannon, Colville<br />
Ernest<br />
Virginia J. McCreight,<br />
Ms.<br />
Spokane<br />
J. Archie Morice, Spokane<br />
TASK FORCE I REGION VIII<br />
Crutcher,'Spokane<br />
Mack<br />
Naomi Sawins, Spokane<br />
Ms.<br />
L. C. Taylor, Spokane<br />
Mrs.<br />
Hazel I. Wynkoop, Spokane<br />
Ms.<br />
Marion Thomas, Spokane<br />
Miss<br />
Long, Spokane<br />
Leonard<br />
S. Casebolt, Spokane<br />
Victor<br />
C. Stebbins, Spokane<br />
Darrel<br />
BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />
ASOTIN,<br />
WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />
AND<br />
Robert Bennett, Chairman,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Richland<br />
Brock, Acting Chairman,<br />
George<br />
Pasco<br />
Omer Carey, Pullman<br />
Dr.<br />
C. A. Barnes, Clarkston-<br />
Rev.<br />
Donald R. McGee, Pomeroy<br />
(Prevalence of Disability)<br />
TASK FORCE II REGION VIII<br />
James Aylward, Walla Walla<br />
Mrs.<br />
Gislesen, Pasco<br />
Harold<br />
William H. Coston, Walla Walla<br />
Dr.<br />
E. Robinson, Walla Walla<br />
John<br />
James Cheatham, WallaWalla<br />
Dr.<br />
Catherine Rew, Walla Walla<br />
Mrs.<br />
Ms. Polly James, Clarkston<br />
BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />
ASOTIN,<br />
WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />
AND<br />
Byron Hunt, Chairman,<br />
Dr.<br />
Walla<br />
Walla<br />
(Workshops, Facilities, & Resources)<br />
Lester Mills, Co-chairman,<br />
Mrs.<br />
LaCrosse<br />
Clapp, Walla Walla<br />
Melvin<br />
Kegley, Walla Walla<br />
Vernon<br />
Mrs. Laura Stratton, Richland<br />
295<br />
Patricia E. McMahon, Kennewick<br />
Mrs.<br />
Jeynes, Olympia<br />
Payson<br />
Helen King, Walla Walla<br />
Mrs.<br />
Christianson, Walla Walla<br />
John<br />
Law Risken, Walla Walla
TASK FORCE III REGION Vlll<br />
BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />
ASOTIN,<br />
WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />
AND<br />
Harry Cobain, Chairman,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Walla<br />
Walla<br />
Rutledge, Co-chairman<br />
Dean<br />
Walla<br />
Walla<br />
Reynolds, Walla Walla<br />
Allen<br />
James Cheatham, Walla<br />
Mrs.<br />
Walla<br />
K. Glaze, Clarkston<br />
Gary<br />
G. Clifton, Colfax<br />
Carroll<br />
Harman, Pullman<br />
Eugene<br />
(Interagency Coordination)<br />
Cadman, Dayton<br />
Roy<br />
W. Bryant, Richland<br />
R.<br />
P. Brown, Prosser<br />
Wesley<br />
Helen Harris, Walla Walla<br />
Mrs.<br />
Julia Leva, Pasco<br />
Mrs.<br />
Frankie Day, Richland<br />
Mrs.<br />
Paysse, Pasco<br />
George<br />
Soper, Walla Walla<br />
Keith<br />
Marking, Ed.D., Pasco<br />
Kenneth<br />
Willis E. Sibley<br />
Mrs.<br />
TASK FORCE IV REGION VIII<br />
BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />
ASOTIN,<br />
WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />
AND<br />
(Vocational Training and Technical Changes)<br />
Virginia Hunsaker,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Chairman, Walla Walla<br />
Acting<br />
M. Webb, Co-chairman,<br />
Everett<br />
Pullman<br />
McCloskey, Ph.D.,<br />
Gordon<br />
Pullman<br />
Bowers, Clarkston<br />
Curtis<br />
Dona Todd, Richland<br />
Mrs.<br />
Mary Gallwey, Pullman<br />
Mrs.<br />
Eickum, Connell<br />
John<br />
O' Bryan, Pullman<br />
Mick<br />
Ray, Richland<br />
Donald<br />
Blessinger, Walla Walla<br />
Douglas<br />
Frances Conway, Walla Walla<br />
Ms.<br />
296<br />
Jeanine Turner, Walla Walla<br />
Ms.<br />
Jordan, Walla Walla<br />
Dale<br />
Matthews, Walla Walla<br />
Thearn<br />
MacFarlan, Kennewick<br />
Robert<br />
Corinne K. Parsons, Richland<br />
Mrs.<br />
M. Robison, Richland<br />
Frank<br />
Jane A. Baker, Colfax<br />
Ms.<br />
Violet R. Lane, Walla. Walla<br />
Ms.<br />
Brownlee, Pasco<br />
Phil<br />
K. Shaber, Lewiston, Idaho (LCNS)<br />
G.<br />
Powell, Prosser<br />
Glenn<br />
Housel, Prosser<br />
Charles<br />
Jesse Bender, Pomeroy
TASK FORCE V REGION Vlll<br />
BENTON, COLUMBIA, FRANKLIN, GARFIELD, WALLA WALLA,<br />
ASOTIN,<br />
WHITMAN COUNTIES<br />
AND<br />
(Barriers to Employment of the Handicapped)<br />
Charles Malody, Chairman,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Pasco<br />
E. Baker, Co-chairman,<br />
Clarence<br />
Walla<br />
Walla<br />
Eunice E. Redshaw,<br />
Mrs.<br />
Clarkston<br />
Co-chairman,<br />
C. Adams, Walla Walla<br />
Jack<br />
Denniston, Kennewick<br />
Vernon<br />
Margaret Racy, Kennewick<br />
Mrs.<br />
A. Bates, Pasco<br />
Dale<br />
J. Locati, Walla Walla<br />
Joe<br />
A. Kramer, Richland<br />
Harry<br />
J. Baker, Walla Walla<br />
Carl<br />
A. Norris, Dayton<br />
Thomas<br />
297<br />
Barbara J. Kirschner, Pullman<br />
Mrs.<br />
P. Halbert, Pasco<br />
C.<br />
David Scott, Pullman<br />
Dr.<br />
Perrine, Clarkston<br />
Scott<br />
Ingram, Clarkston<br />
Robert<br />
& Mrs. Don Adams, Clarkston<br />
Mr.<br />
Feucht, Clarkston<br />
Carroll<br />
Anderson, Clarkston<br />
Fred<br />
Hayes, Clarkston<br />
Oliver<br />
Spring, Clarkston<br />
Norman<br />
Clarkston<br />
AntoneMauhar,<br />
Dunaway, Lewiston, Idaho<br />
Jack<br />
Jack Reed, Lewiston, Idaho
APPENDIX D<br />
document has been prepared as a proposal by Percy Bell,<br />
This<br />
Federal Offenders Program, with the help of Cecil A.<br />
Coordinator,<br />
State Supervisor of Correctional Services, both of the Division<br />
Price,<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation, to illustrate the complexity of providing<br />
of<br />
services to all the offenders in Washington State by<br />
rehabilitation<br />
1975.<br />
I. Purposeof Plan<br />
(PROPOSED)<br />
OF WASHINGTON<br />
STATE<br />
CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION PLAN<br />
COMPREHENSIVE<br />
FOR PUBLIC OFFENDERS<br />
plan is to be the framework upon which a comprehensive<br />
This<br />
for correctional rehabilitation can be built in the State of<br />
plan<br />
As time passes it is expected that changes will be<br />
Washington.<br />
It is hoped this plan will be flexible enough to allow<br />
made.<br />
changes without losing emphasis on and need for major ele-<br />
these<br />
This document will be in the. nature of policy statement.<br />
ments.<br />
will be followed by procedural manuals required to set policy<br />
This<br />
action.<br />
in<br />
implementation of the plan will take time. Funding,<br />
The<br />
of suitable personnel and the establishment of adequate<br />
training<br />
will all influence the speed withwhich implementation<br />
priorities<br />
take place.<br />
can<br />
evaluation and intuitive perceptions may all be used<br />
Research<br />
a basis for making changes in this plan or the procedural<br />
as<br />
manuals.<br />
II. Statement of Principles for Developing this Plan<br />
A. Assumptions<br />
Eventually a program will be in operation that will<br />
i.<br />
major needs of all the clients classified as<br />
meet<br />
public offenders.<br />
Meeting these needs will aid materially in developing<br />
2.<br />
responsible citizenry.<br />
more<br />
3. This will aid in reducing crime and delinquency.<br />
The sooner the counselor can contact the client the<br />
4.<br />
better.<br />
Providing rehabilitation services will enhance and<br />
5.<br />
resources.<br />
conservehuman<br />
298
There are not enough trained persons now to staff<br />
6.<br />
plan.<br />
thefull<br />
B. Other principles<br />
Motivational activities will have to be included in<br />
I.<br />
for services.<br />
planning<br />
Not all clien6s can be reached on an individual basis.<br />
2.<br />
group activity will have to be provided prior to<br />
Some<br />
referral and during .service.<br />
Disinterest in service cannot be used as an excuse<br />
3.<br />
discontinueefforts to provide service. Lack of<br />
to<br />
is part of the disability (deviant behavior)<br />
interest<br />
needs treatment as such.<br />
and<br />
Necessary emergent services need to be supplied during<br />
4.<br />
evaluation period prior to eligibility certification.<br />
the<br />
State rather than district supervision of correctional<br />
5.<br />
services will be continued.<br />
rehabilitation<br />
Most services will be provided by the district in which<br />
6.<br />
correctional facility is located.<br />
the<br />
Correctional rehabilitation counselors will be assigned<br />
7.<br />
caseloads.<br />
specialized<br />
Caseloads will be small enough to allow the counselor<br />
8.<br />
opportunity to provide expeditious service. (not<br />
an<br />
to exceed 50-65 initially)<br />
Nature of Problems Involved.in Developing a Correctional Rehabili-<br />
III.<br />
Plan<br />
tation<br />
Definition of a public offender: A public offender is any<br />
No<br />
or adult convicted or adjudicated by a court of<br />
juvenile<br />
jurisdiction, whether federal, state, or local,<br />
competent<br />
persons institutionalized, probated, paroled or<br />
including<br />
otherwise released.<br />
B. Magnitude of the problem.<br />
State rehabilitation district organization. It is anti-<br />
i.<br />
that housekeeping services, supplies, reports,<br />
cipated<br />
case services will be routinely handled through the<br />
and<br />
organization. Policy decisions, appointment of<br />
district<br />
and decisions regarding questionable case<br />
counselors,<br />
will be made through the State Supervisor of<br />
srvices<br />
Rehabilitation. In-service training will<br />
Correctional<br />
provided by the State Supervisor of Training in<br />
be<br />
299
with the State Supervisor of Correctional<br />
collaboration<br />
Rehabilitation.<br />
2. Crime rates<br />
3. Federal offenders<br />
a. Federal Courts, Probation and Parole officers<br />
Western District, Seattle and north<br />
(i)<br />
Western District, Tacoma and south<br />
(2)<br />
(3) Eastern District, Spokane<br />
b. U. S. Penitentiary, McNeil Island, Steilacoom<br />
c. U. S. Prison Camp, McNeil Island, Steilacoom<br />
d. Indian Tribal Courts<br />
4. State offenders<br />
a. Board of Prison Terms and Parole<br />
b. State Department of Institutions<br />
Division of Probation and Parole<br />
(i)<br />
Division of Adult Correction<br />
(2)<br />
Washington Corrections Center, Shelton<br />
(a<br />
Reception center<br />
i.<br />
Training center<br />
2.<br />
Washington Penitentiary, Walla Walla<br />
(b<br />
Washington State Reformatory, Monroe<br />
(c<br />
Honor Camps at Clearwater, Larch Mountain,<br />
(d<br />
Okan0gan,Washougal<br />
Honor Farms at Monroe and Walla Walla<br />
(e<br />
Women'sPrison, now at Walla Walla<br />
(f<br />
facility under construction at Purdy)<br />
(New<br />
Division of Juvenile Rehabilitation<br />
(3)<br />
Facilities and schools<br />
(a<br />
Cascadia Juvenile Reception and<br />
i.<br />
Center, Tacoma<br />
Diagnostic<br />
Fort Worden Treatment Center, POrt<br />
2.<br />
Townsend<br />
Greenhill School (male), Chehalis<br />
3.<br />
Maple Lane School (female), Grand Mound<br />
4.<br />
Echo Glen School, Preston<br />
5.<br />
Youth Camps<br />
(b<br />
Spruce Canyon, Colville<br />
I.<br />
Cedar Creek, Little Rock<br />
2.<br />
300
Youth Camps (continued)<br />
(b<br />
Mission.Creek, Belfair<br />
3.<br />
Naselle<br />
4.<br />
Indian Ridge (Older Boys), Arlington<br />
5.<br />
Group Homes<br />
(c<br />
Woodinville<br />
i.<br />
Riverside, Tacoma<br />
2.<br />
Ephrata (boys)<br />
3.<br />
Oak Ridge (girls),Lakewood<br />
4.<br />
Canyon View (boys), East Wenatchee<br />
5.<br />
(d Juvenile Parole Offices<br />
5. County-city youth facilities, detention homes<br />
6. County courts and adult jails<br />
Probation and Parole service<br />
a.<br />
Cedar Hills Alcoholism Program<br />
b.<br />
c. Jail services<br />
7. Municipal courts and adult jails<br />
a.<br />
Work release<br />
Probation and parole services<br />
b.<br />
Jail services<br />
c.<br />
8. Tribal Courts, Neah Bay, Taholah, Toppenish, Spokane<br />
School/Vocational Rehabilitation Cooperative Programs<br />
9.<br />
needs<br />
Seattle<br />
I0. Citizen Involvement<br />
a.<br />
Facilities<br />
Halfway houses<br />
(i)<br />
Work and study release facilities<br />
(2)<br />
M-2 Program job therapy<br />
(3)<br />
First Avenue Service Center<br />
(4)<br />
Pioneer Industries<br />
(5)<br />
Friends of Youth<br />
(6)<br />
Jewish Homes<br />
(7)<br />
Catholic Homes<br />
(8)<br />
Lutheran Homes<br />
(9)<br />
Atlantic Street Center<br />
(I0)<br />
Other programs including Model Cities<br />
(ii)<br />
IV. Eligibility Case Finding, Referral Sources<br />
Characteristics of the Public Offender: Most public offenders<br />
Ao<br />
meet the criteria for services as provided by the 1965<br />
can<br />
to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act. However,<br />
Amendments<br />
eligibility does have to be documented, using medical,<br />
this<br />
301
Bo<br />
Co<br />
DQ<br />
No<br />
or psychological reports. Most of these clients<br />
psychiatric<br />
exhibit a behavioral disorder, persisting over a period<br />
will<br />
time and manifesting itself in various settings, such as<br />
of<br />
on the job, before the courts and the family. In<br />
schools,<br />
instances it may be necessary to supplement psychiatric<br />
some<br />
psychological evaluations with reports from a variety<br />
and/or<br />
examiners and observers, such as teachers, employers,<br />
of<br />
officers, official service agencies or law enforce-<br />
probation<br />
agencies, It is anticipated that a report of the Insti-<br />
ment<br />
for Rehabilitation Services, being held in May 1969 at<br />
tute<br />
Nebraska, will form a solid basis for assisting in<br />
Lincoln,<br />
determination of eligibility in accordance with the 1968<br />
the<br />
Amendments to the Vocational Rehabilitation Act.<br />
Finding: It is anticipated that procedures will be<br />
Case<br />
out in each district to facilitate the identification<br />
worked<br />
those persons, adult, juvenile, felon, or misdemeanant,<br />
of<br />
would profit by services of the rehabilitation counselor<br />
that<br />
with correctional rehabilitation responsibilities.<br />
charged<br />
lack of interest in selfimprovement is often character-<br />
Since<br />
of this clientele, motivational activities will be posi-<br />
istic<br />
pursued.<br />
tively<br />
Sources: Most active referrals will be correctional<br />
Referral<br />
courts at several levels and the probation and<br />
institutions,<br />
services in the adult and juvenile field. It is not<br />
parole<br />
that these be the only referral sources. Both<br />
intended<br />
and private agencies often are working with these<br />
public<br />
either specifica-ly about illegal activities or in<br />
clients,<br />
with some other problems. If it is appropriate,<br />
connection<br />
clients may be referred to the correctional rehabili-<br />
such<br />
counselors. There may be times when the general case-<br />
tation<br />
counselor would more appropriately receive referrals.<br />
load<br />
for Diagnostic Services: It is assumed that most<br />
Eligibility<br />
have eligibility for diagnostic servicesand the<br />
referrals<br />
needs for diagnosis should be identified immediately.<br />
specific<br />
services are identified as needed for diagnostic purposes.<br />
Many<br />
any of the needs as identified are prohibited by the state<br />
If<br />
the possibility of supplying these needs through<br />
manual,<br />
15 funds as discussed in paragraph V-F below or from<br />
Section<br />
agencies should be explored. Providing needed<br />
private<br />
services immediately is crucial with these clients.<br />
for services under rehabilitation plan: Since<br />
Eligibility<br />
basic eligibility for services needed in a rehabilitation<br />
the<br />
is a requirement for any extensive services, it is impera-<br />
plan<br />
that this determination be made at the earliest possible<br />
tive<br />
For those cases which are referred from the institution,<br />
date.<br />
often there will be up-to-date medical, psychiatric,<br />
quite<br />
psychological data which will support a finding of eligibility.<br />
302
Fo<br />
Go<br />
not, this information will be obtained prior to release<br />
If<br />
the institution. This then provides a basis for the<br />
from<br />
receiving the case in the community to provide<br />
counselor<br />
immediate services. Eligibility for those received<br />
almost<br />
the community will not usually be as easy to determine<br />
from<br />
there is more likelihood that the necessary reports<br />
because<br />
not be available for making the determination. Proce-<br />
will<br />
for obtaining a necessary documentation will be worked<br />
dures<br />
to expedite its determination. If extended evaluation<br />
out<br />
required, determination will be made early and documented<br />
is<br />
so that needed services may be provided for expeditiously.<br />
for rehabilitation services: Once basic eligi-<br />
Feasibility<br />
has been determined the next consideration is the<br />
bility<br />
of providing rehabilitation services. Since<br />
feasibility<br />
of interest or lack of follow-through on the part of the<br />
lack<br />
for services arranged is one of the characteristics<br />
client<br />
the disability and will be treated similarly to any other<br />
of<br />
This characteristic will not be used as the<br />
disability.<br />
basis for terminating services.<br />
sole<br />
for rehabilitation services: Need for rehabilitation<br />
Need<br />
will be determined as provided by the manual. The<br />
services<br />
in cooperation with the client will determine total<br />
counselor<br />
and then a decision and an agreement with the client<br />
needs<br />
be made as to what part of these needs will be furnished<br />
will<br />
the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and which will<br />
by<br />
furnished by the client himself, or other agency. The<br />
be<br />
of the whole family of the client will be taken into<br />
needs<br />
consideration in making these determinations.<br />
State of Washington<br />
Need<br />
Estimated<br />
for<br />
RehabilitationProfessional Personnel<br />
Correctional<br />
1975<br />
in<br />
following estimates of need for correctional rehabilitation<br />
The<br />
are based on the following assumptions:<br />
personnel<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation wants to have a comprehensive<br />
i)<br />
rehabilitation (CR) program in operation<br />
correctional<br />
by 1975.<br />
303
Counselors will not be required to accept unmanageable<br />
2)<br />
(Until further experience has been gained,<br />
caseloads.<br />
is believed a counselor should have no more than<br />
it<br />
[50] active cases at one time.)<br />
fifty<br />
A definite functional responsibility will be assigned to<br />
3)<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation district for the correc-<br />
each<br />
tional rehabilitation within the district.<br />
Specialized personnel will handle offender caseloads<br />
4)<br />
the district, usually with this being the major<br />
within<br />
responsibility of that personnel.<br />
Until firmly established, the CR program will be super-<br />
5)<br />
at the state level.<br />
vised<br />
Any program expanded on a comprehensive statewide basis<br />
6)<br />
have to be flexible in staff assignments and funding<br />
will<br />
support.<br />
Priorities will have to be set at the state level with<br />
7)<br />
of the Directorof the Department of Institu-<br />
concurrence<br />
tions and the Director of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation District I<br />
served: Grays Harbor, Mason, Thurston, Lewis, Wahkiakum,<br />
Counties<br />
Skamania, Klickitat, Clark<br />
Cowlitz,<br />
served: Federal,- state.and nuvenile probation and parole;<br />
Institutions<br />
Corrections Center; Maple Lane School, Green Hill<br />
Washington<br />
Staff Required:<br />
Larch Mountain and Washougal Honor Camps; District<br />
School;<br />
Juvenile Courts; Skokomish Indian Reservation; Shoal-<br />
Courts;<br />
water Indian Reservation<br />
Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional Rehabili-<br />
(i)<br />
tation<br />
Counselor for federal offenders (Vancouver)<br />
()<br />
Counselor for federal offenders (Olympia)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for juveniles and misdemeanants (Vancouver)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for juveniles and misdemeanants (Olympia)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for all offenders (Aberdeen)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselors for Washington Corrections Center (Shelton)<br />
(3)<br />
Counselor for Maple Lane and Green Hill Schools (Chehalis)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for •uvenile delinquency prevention (Olympia)<br />
(i)<br />
304
Vocational Rehabilitation Districtll<br />
Counties served: Jefferson, Clallam, Kitsap, Pierce<br />
served: Federal, state and juvenile probation andparole;<br />
Institutions<br />
S. Penitentiary and Prison Camp, McNeil Island; Cascadia<br />
U.<br />
Staff Required:<br />
Center; Fort Worden, Mission Creek Forest Camp;<br />
Diagnostic<br />
Canyon; oakridge (Lakewood); Pioneer (Tacoma); River-<br />
Spruce<br />
Women's Corrections Center (Purdy); Neah Bay Tribal<br />
side;<br />
Clearwater Tribal Court; Hoh Indian Reservation; Ozette<br />
Court;<br />
Reservation; Quillayute Indian Reservation; U. S.<br />
Indian<br />
District Courts.<br />
Court;<br />
Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />
(I)<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Counselor for federal offenders (Tacoma)<br />
(I)<br />
Counselors for McNeil Island Penitentiary and Prison<br />
(5)<br />
Camp<br />
Counselors for State probation and parole (Tacoma)<br />
(2)<br />
Counselor for juvenile probation and parole (Tacoma)<br />
(1)<br />
Counselors for district courts (misdemeanants) (Tacoma,<br />
(2)<br />
Bremerton)<br />
Counselor for Cascadia (Tacoma)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for Oakridge, Pioneer and Riverside (Tacoma)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for juvenile delinquency prevention (Tacoma)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for all offenders, including Neah Bay Tribal<br />
(i)<br />
(Port Angeles)<br />
Court<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation District III<br />
County served: King<br />
Served: Federal, state, juvenile and King County ro-<br />
Institutions<br />
and parole; King County Jail, Seattle City Jail;<br />
bation<br />
Staff Required:<br />
municipal, district and U. S. Courts; halfway<br />
juvenile,<br />
Central Area Vocational Rehabilitation Office;<br />
houses;<br />
Center; Model Cities; Woodinville Group Home;<br />
Miti-Service<br />
Glen Children's Center; Cedar Hills Alcoholism Treat-<br />
Echo<br />
ment Center.<br />
Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />
(i)<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Counselors for federal probation and parole (located<br />
(2)<br />
Chief U. S. @robation Officer)<br />
with<br />
Counselor for federal parolees (McNeil Island and<br />
(i)<br />
Seattle)<br />
305
Counselors for State probationers and parolees<br />
(3)<br />
Counselor for juvenile probation and parole<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for Juvenile court<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for Echo Glen<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for Cedar Hills<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for juvenile delinquency prevention<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for Central Area Vocational Rehabilitation and<br />
(i)<br />
Cities<br />
Model<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation District IV<br />
Counties served: Snohomish, Skagit, Island, San Juan, Whatcom<br />
served: Federal, state and juvenile probation and parole;<br />
Institutions<br />
State Reformatory; district and juvenile courts;<br />
Washington<br />
Staff required:<br />
Indian Reservation; Lummi Tribal Court; Indian Ridge<br />
Tulalip<br />
Camp (Arlington July 1969).<br />
Youth<br />
Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />
(i)<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Counselor for federal offenders (Everett)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselors for state.probation and parole, including<br />
(2)<br />
Indian Reservation (Everett and Bellingham)<br />
Tulalip<br />
Counselors for Washington State Reformatory (Monroe)<br />
(3)<br />
Counselors for juvenile probation and parole (Everett<br />
(2)<br />
Bellingham)<br />
and<br />
Counselor for juvenile delinquency prevention (Everett)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for all offenders (Skagit, Whatcom and San<br />
(i)<br />
Juan Counties) (Bellingham)<br />
Vocational Rehabilitation District V<br />
served: Chelan, Okanogan, Douglas, Ferry, Adams, Pend Oreille,<br />
Counties<br />
Spokane, Stevens Whitman Grant<br />
Lincoln,<br />
served: Okanogan Honor Camp; Federal, state and juvenile<br />
Institutions<br />
and parole; Canyon View (boys East Wenachee,<br />
probation<br />
Staff Required:<br />
Ephrata Group Home; U. S. Courts; District Courts;<br />
1969);<br />
Tribal Court; Colville Indian Reservation; Kalispel<br />
Spokane<br />
Indian Reservation<br />
Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional Rehabili-<br />
(i)<br />
tation<br />
Counselor for federal offenders<br />
(I)<br />
Counselorsfor state probation and parole (Spokane and<br />
(2)<br />
Wenatchee)<br />
306
Counselors for uvenile probation and parole (Spokane<br />
(2)<br />
Wenatchee)<br />
and<br />
Counselor for misdemeanants (Spokane)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for Indian courts and reservations (Spokane)<br />
(i)<br />
Counselor for all offenders (Grant, Adams and Whitman<br />
(i)<br />
(Pullman)<br />
Counties)<br />
Vocational RehabilitationDistrictVl<br />
served: Kittitas, Columbia, Yakima, Walla Walla, Benton,<br />
Counties<br />
Franklin, Asotin<br />
Garfield,<br />
Served: Federal, state and juvenile probation and parole;<br />
Institutions<br />
State Penitentiary (Walla Walla); District Courts,<br />
Washington<br />
Staff Required<br />
Juvenile Courts; Yakima Tribal Court<br />
Assistant District Supervisor for Correctional<br />
(i)<br />
ion<br />
Rehabilitat<br />
Counselor for federal offenders, including Yakima<br />
(i)<br />
Court (Yakima)<br />
Tribal<br />
Counselors for Washington State Penitentiary (Walla Walla)<br />
(3)<br />
Counselors for juvenile probation and parole (Yakima<br />
(2)<br />
Tri-Cities)<br />
and<br />
Counselors for state probation and parole (Yakima and<br />
(2)<br />
Tri-Cities)<br />
STATE SUPERVISORY STAFF<br />
State Supervisor of Correctional Rehabilitation Services<br />
Consultant for Adult Correctional Programs<br />
i.<br />
Consultant for Juvenile Correctional Programs<br />
2.<br />
Consultant for Federal Correctional Programs,<br />
3.<br />
Tribal Courts<br />
including<br />
Supervisor of Vocational Rehabilitation Services (.Institutions)<br />
307
State of Washington<br />
CORRECTIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES<br />
TOTAL ESTIMATEDPERSONNEL NEEDS IN 1975<br />
State Level Vocational Rehabilitation 4<br />
State Level Institutions<br />
District I counselors II<br />
District II counselors 16.<br />
District III counselors 13<br />
District IV counselors ii<br />
District V dounselors<br />
District VI 9<br />
TOTAL 74<br />
308
of Washington<br />
State<br />
STATEWIDE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION<br />
GOVERNOR'S<br />
Olympia<br />
MEETING OF RESEARCH PERSONNEL<br />
A<br />
of Washington September 8, 1967<br />
University<br />
APPENDIX E<br />
of State agencies and departments of the Univer-<br />
Representatives<br />
of Washington had an opportunity to exchange information about research<br />
sity<br />
in progress, program needs and services in a meeting arranged by<br />
currently<br />
C. Carson, Project Director, and held at the University of Washington<br />
David<br />
on Friday, September 8.<br />
meeting was called by David W. Peyton, Administrative Assistant<br />
The<br />
Governor Evans, and Chairman of the Commission, and Mr. Carson, Commission<br />
to<br />
Project Director.<br />
a common concern and interest in areas of service related<br />
Sharing<br />
vocational rehabilitation were the following persons who attended the<br />
to<br />
meeting<br />
Attending from the University of Washington:<br />
Jerald Forster, University of Washington Rehabilitation Counseling Education<br />
Dr.<br />
Irwin G. Sarason, Project Director, University of Washington Department of Psychol.<br />
Dr.<br />
Manzer John Griswold, Research Director, Rehab. Research Institute, U. of W.<br />
Dr.<br />
John M. Palmer, Speech and Hearing Clinic<br />
Dr.<br />
Henry W. Maier, Professor, School of Social Work<br />
Dr.<br />
Jerome R. Miller, School of Social Work<br />
Dr.<br />
Elizabeth C. Giblin, Professor, School of Nursing<br />
Dr.<br />
Laurie M. Gunter, School of Nursing<br />
Dr.<br />
Harold L. Fish, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Seattle, and U. of W.<br />
Mr.<br />
Norris Go Haring, MRCD Center<br />
Dr.<br />
Dr. Thomas F. Lewis, School of SocialWork<br />
Attending from State Agencies Olympia<br />
Valerie Brakel, Supervisor, State Services for the Blind, Public Assistance<br />
Mrs.<br />
Wallace Lane, Deputy Director, Washington State Department of Health<br />
Dr.<br />
Tom Anderson,State Department of Health<br />
Dr.<br />
Alan W. Metcalf, Director of Research, Superintendent of Public Instruction's Off.<br />
Dr.<br />
Merlyn S. Matthews, Federal Offenders Rehabilitation Program<br />
Dr.<br />
Mack Knutsen, Supervisor, Division of Planning, Department of Institutions<br />
Dr.<br />
Irvin F. Bryan, upervisor of Planning, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Mr.<br />
John M. Willits, Supervisor, Youth Development & Conservation Corps, State Parks &<br />
Mr.<br />
Recreation<br />
Payson Jeynes, District Supervisor, Vocational Adjustment Services, Division of<br />
Mr.<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
Vocational<br />
John D. Lane, Chief Medical Consultant, Medical Section, Dept. of Labor & Industries<br />
Dr.<br />
Duane S. Stookey, Supervisor of Industrial Insurance, Dept. of Labor & Industries<br />
Mr.<br />
Robert H. Leahy, State Medical Director, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Dr.<br />
Robert A. Anderson, Manager, Business & Economic Research Div. Dept. of Commerce &<br />
Mr.<br />
Development<br />
Economic<br />
310
Attending om State Agencies Olympia (cont'd)<br />
Jean Mead, Research Analyst, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Mrs.<br />
Maurice Powers, Planning and Procedures, Department of Public Assistance<br />
Mr.<br />
Ernest Kramer, Director, Division of Vocational Education<br />
Mr.<br />
Edward E. Ryan, Department of Public Assistance<br />
Mr.<br />
Norman N. Gibson, Research Analyst, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Mr.<br />
Norman C. Richardson, Director, Community College Board<br />
Dr.<br />
Mr. L. P. Kirry, Acting Director, Planning and Community Affairs Agency<br />
Others:<br />
Sherman Pinto, Member, Planning Commission for Vocational Rehabilitation<br />
Mrs.<br />
W. Phillip Strawn, Washington State Research Council, Director<br />
Mr.<br />
Orego.n<br />
Mr. Cleveland Anschell, Consulting Services Corporation<br />
Mr. Dan W. Schausten, Project Director, Oregon Planning Committee for Voc. Rehab.<br />
Mr. Carson presided at the meeting.<br />
University, in its schools.and colleges, is developing or already<br />
The<br />
educational degrees at bachelor, master and doctoral levels to meet<br />
offering<br />
demand for training personnel in the fields of rehabilitation and allied<br />
the<br />
of service. Research projects of great range and variety are part of a<br />
areas<br />
continuing search for program innovations.<br />
agencies, i.e., the various departments of state government,<br />
Service<br />
to benefit from programs at the University. They employ the trained<br />
stand<br />
use the research findings, and seek technical assistance for their<br />
graduates,<br />
research undertakings. By a feedback of their own needs and staffing<br />
own<br />
they tend to influence program planning and curriculum at the Uni-<br />
problems<br />
in a mutually profitable exchange of service and information.<br />
versity<br />
discussions developed at the meeting centered around general<br />
The<br />
of existing or planned programs.<br />
descriptions<br />
-O-<br />
Department of Psychology at the University is currently developing<br />
The<br />
training program, according to Dr. Sarason, to which it hopes to admit students<br />
a<br />
doctoral degrees in 1968. The program which will prepare students to work<br />
for<br />
the areas of crime, delinquency, and physical handicaps is finding qualified<br />
in<br />
staff in very short supply. Another stumbling block is the lack of<br />
teaching<br />
personnel in workshops and rehabilitation facilities which would<br />
supervisory<br />
be used in the student training programs.<br />
Forster commented that the University can turn out graduates,<br />
Dr,<br />
if salaries in the state are not improved, Washington will continue to<br />
but<br />
people for California and other states. Graduates with M.A. Degrees<br />
train<br />
coming out of the counselor training program, but never in sufficient<br />
are<br />
numbers to fill the need in WashingtonState. He introduced the subject of<br />
311
people who have been used successfully in various programs<br />
subprofessional<br />
teacher aides, hospital helpers, and in community programs of the Office<br />
as<br />
Economic Opportunity. Surveys of professional people frequently show<br />
of<br />
using their time in activities that untrained people could do for them.<br />
them<br />
Jeynes said that the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation had<br />
Mr.<br />
training teacher aides in small numbers through courses set up in one<br />
been<br />
of the community colleges.<br />
Knutson, in reply to a question, said that the Department of<br />
Dr.<br />
has some 12,000 employees, most of them with high school di-<br />
Institutions<br />
plomas, but some with less.<br />
Sarason thought research in the employment of subprofessionals<br />
Dr.<br />
be helpful and cited examples from a research project at the Cascade<br />
would<br />
and Research Center where youthful offenders are being schooled<br />
Disagnostic<br />
socially acceptable behavior. Research might be helpful in defining the<br />
in<br />
kind of subprofessional most useful in a therapeutic situation, he suggested.<br />
Mathews described the vocational rehabilitation program dealing<br />
Mrs.<br />
federal offenders and some of the research methods being followed to see<br />
with<br />
the services of a vocational rehabilitation counselor will reduce re-<br />
whether<br />
among adult offenders. In at least two instances, subprofessionals<br />
cidivism<br />
are helping the trained counselors in this program.<br />
Kramer said that the vocational education program which trains<br />
Mr.<br />
people is aware that these subprofessionals are able to make<br />
subprofessional<br />
substantial contributions in the area of rehabilitation.<br />
Griswold is using graduate students with experience in voca-<br />
Dr.<br />
rehabilitation in a study and evaluation of the usefulness of family<br />
tional<br />
for vocational rehabilitation clients in state programs. Students<br />
counseling<br />
looking at family involvement, at the experiences of clients from different<br />
are<br />
of family life, and data from agency R-300 reporting forms to show<br />
cycloes<br />
has happened to the client during the last fiscal year. He feels that<br />
what<br />
study, is producing a great deal of useful information and that the results<br />
the<br />
the project should be helpful to agencies by helping them understand their<br />
of<br />
operations. Dr. Griswold said he is also interested in how agency con-<br />
own<br />
should be evaluated. Some graduate students are looking into this<br />
tributions<br />
one of the questions being explored is why a number of excellent demon-<br />
and<br />
have not "caught fire" and been put to use by agencies.<br />
strations<br />
Forster agreed that failure to use research findings was a<br />
Dr.<br />
He cited Tacoma Goodwill as an excellent example of applied research.<br />
problem.<br />
designed research abstracts, he thought, have a place in carrying useful<br />
Well<br />
to the executive level. Innovations often involve considerable<br />
information<br />
risk.<br />
Metcalf pointed to this as a key issue in programs supported<br />
Dr.<br />
public funds. The risk factor is closely related to research findings and<br />
by<br />
their use by agencies.<br />
Hating described the new mental retardation and child development<br />
Dr.<br />
where basic research will become applied research in settings very much<br />
center<br />
312
natural classrooms used from preschool through high school. Here inno-<br />
like<br />
from basic research laboratories will be refined, developed and applied<br />
vations<br />
a controlled experimental situation. Teachers, counselors and psychologists<br />
in<br />
work in the facility. Last year, in temporary quarters 200 college stu-<br />
will<br />
from undergraduate to doctoral levels, participated in the program.<br />
dents,<br />
observed. Others conducted research projects° They came from a variety<br />
Some<br />
disciplines pediatrics, psychology, medicine, special education, nursing<br />
of<br />
and others.<br />
education<br />
Lane asked how. research could be implemented, and hoped some<br />
Dr.<br />
would be forthcoming.<br />
answers<br />
Forster thought that locating research functions directly under<br />
Dr.<br />
head of the'state agency was a helpful step and mentioned that the division<br />
the<br />
research in the department of institutions reported to that agency's director,<br />
of<br />
Conte.<br />
Dr.<br />
Kirry described the functions of the new State Planning and<br />
Mr.<br />
Affairs Agency, created by the 1967 Legislature as a staff agency<br />
Community<br />
the office of the Governor. A prime function of the new agency will be<br />
in<br />
assist the Governor in pulling together the planning and programming<br />
to<br />
state government and to serve in a liaison and coordinating capacity<br />
within<br />
state and local government planning activities. A small staff will call<br />
for<br />
state boards and agencies for help in reducing and digesting specialized<br />
on<br />
for use by the Governor. Within the new agency a State Planning<br />
information<br />
will be concerned with plans and programs within state government;<br />
Division<br />
Community Affairs Division will look to interrelationships between state<br />
a<br />
local government; and a Research Division will take on the functions of<br />
and<br />
State Census Board.<br />
the<br />
Elizabeth Giblin spoke of research projects in the School of<br />
Dr.<br />
Of particular interest to rehabilitation workers is a program<br />
Nursing.<br />
prepares teachers, supervisors, andothers to work with the mentally<br />
which<br />
and another training program in rehabilitation nursing financed<br />
retarded,<br />
by a Federal grant, for teachers, administrators and consultants.<br />
Gunter added that putting research into practice is.a problem<br />
Dr.<br />
the School of Nursing as it is with other programs.<br />
in<br />
Richardson mentioned two-year RN training programs which are<br />
Dr.<br />
in the community colleges and said that almost all of the estab-<br />
available<br />
community,colleges have LPN courses. Students may also attend com-<br />
lished<br />
colleges for their first year of nurses' training and transfer to<br />
munity<br />
the University for the four-year course.<br />
Fish said that the Seattle Office of the Division of Voca-<br />
Mr.<br />
Rehabilitation worked very. closely with programs at the University,<br />
tional<br />
those of the School of Nursing and the Department of Physical<br />
especially<br />
and Rehabilitation.<br />
Medicine<br />
Division of the Blind, Mrs. Brakel said, is looking toward<br />
The<br />
closer relationship with Dr. Forster's program in the Fall.<br />
a<br />
313
Stookey of the Department of Labor and Industry described<br />
Mr.<br />
agency's concern with physical disability and the rehabilitation of the<br />
that<br />
workman. Physical restoration measures used at the Dr. Buckner Center<br />
injured<br />
largely successful. The interest of the Department in the vocational re-<br />
are<br />
habilitation program is assured, he said.<br />
Anderson saw a comprehensive health services center as a real<br />
Dr.<br />
in the rehabilitation process for Labor and Industries and others<br />
need<br />
a rehabilitation team would evaluate the extent of services needed to<br />
where<br />
disability and return clients to employment. Such a facility is in<br />
overcome<br />
planning stages now. When asked about job information for clients with<br />
the<br />
handicaps, Dr. Anderson said he thought this was available through<br />
specific<br />
the Employment Security Department.<br />
Carson called on Mr. Willits who described the State Parks<br />
Mr.<br />
which has as its primary concern the provision of opportunities for<br />
program<br />
recreation for the people of the State,. the handicapped among them.<br />
outdoor<br />
the beginning of the poverty program a statewide youth corps program<br />
Since<br />
been providing job opportunities to approximately 1500 young men and<br />
has<br />
many of them clients of the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation.<br />
women,<br />
new MDTA program is to provide career training in recreation for disabled<br />
A<br />
people.<br />
Bryan referred back to the morning session of the meeting, saying<br />
Mr.<br />
what he heard there reminded him of something that used to be called<br />
that<br />
rehabilitation" and which involved the entire family. He saw a client<br />
"total<br />
service agency, such as the Division, experiencing difficulties in<br />
oriented<br />
the Federal program within the DVR state plan, state law, and<br />
accommodating<br />
State Constitution itself.<br />
the<br />
Metcalf expressed the belief that one of the Commission's<br />
Dr.<br />
is defining the scope of their study. Dr. Haring added the need<br />
problems<br />
determine the incidence of the handicapped. Dr. Forster asked what<br />
to<br />
of the handicapped was being used. Dr. Palmer called attention<br />
definition<br />
the published Rehabilitation Codes prepared by Maya Riviere under a<br />
to<br />
grant and which define impairments and disabilities.<br />
Federal<br />
Schausten reported on the work of the Oregon Statewide Planning<br />
Mr.<br />
and on the cooperative agreement which exists between Oregon and<br />
Commission<br />
Washington.<br />
in a second meeting of the group was expressed, possibly<br />
Interest<br />
specific areas of discussion defined in an agenda prepared and circu-<br />
with<br />
lated before the meeting.<br />
the close of the meeting, Mrs. Pinto, as the only representative<br />
At<br />
the Statewide Planning Commission present, said she hoped a second session<br />
of<br />
of the group would be attended by more Commission members.<br />
report of the meeting was prepared by Jean Mead from notes<br />
This<br />
by Mary Simila, Administrative Secretary of the Planning Commission.<br />
taken<br />
314