a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process

3.5.Housing and Sheltering; Right to Live in a Healthy Environment
and Results of the Arrangements......................................................... 90
3.5.1.Social State Practices..................................................................... 91
3.5.2.Influences on Cities and Urban Planning Discipline..................... 93
3.5.2.1.Housing Right ....................................................................... 94
3.5.2.2.Limitation of Ownership Rights, Urban Land Profits
and Interest............................................................................ 95
3.5.2.3.Individual, Social and Public Interest ................................... 97
3.5.2.4.Results Orienting the Turkish Practices................................ 98
CHAPTER 4. EVALUATION OF THE JUDICIAL CONTROL AND
PLANNING PROCESS DIRECTION ON THE JUSTICE
DEMAND IN NARLIDERE AND BALÇOVA SETTLEMENTS..... 100
4.1.Development Process of Balçova and Narlıdere Settlements............ 100
4.2.General Evaluation of Actions Proceeded Inside Municipal
Boundaries of Balçova and Narlıdere................................................ 109
4.2.1.General Evaluation of the Actions Proceeded Regarding
Planning and Space...................................................................... 113
4.2.2.Actions According to Plaintiff Parties......................................... 116
4.2.3.Detailed Classification and Contents of Spatial Actions............. 118
4.2.4.General Evaluation Results of Proceeded Actions ..................... 128
4.3.Detailed Examination of Spatial Actions Proceeded Between
1992-2003 ............................................................................................. 130
4.3.1.Actions about Expropriation........................................................ 131
4.3.1.1.Actions Regarding Annulment of Expropriation of
Highways and Development Plans That It’s Based On:
Development of the Process and Results – (Balçova) ....... 133
4.3.1.2.Claims of Parties in Litigation Process............................... 133
4.3.1.3.General Evaluation ............................................................. 136
4.3.2.Decisions of the Committee of Protection................................... 137
4.3.2.1.Claims of Parties in Litigation Process............................... 139
4.3.2.2.Actions Regarding Özdilek................................................. 144
4.3.2.3.General Evaluation ............................................................. 147
viii