a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Deakin, Elizabeth (... ) Social Equity in Planning, Berkeley Planning Journal, Vol.13, http://www-derp.ced.berkeley.edu/bpj/deakin13.html Dear, M. ( 1998) Privatization and the Rhetoric of Planning Practice, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol.7, pp. 449-462. Eldener, Y. B. & Tokatlı, N. (2002) Globalization and the Changing Political Economy of Distribution Channels in Turkey, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 34, pp. 217-238. Fainstein N. I.&Fainstein S. S. (1979, September) New Debates In Urban Planning:The Impact of Marxist Theory Within The United States, IJURR 3, pp. 381-403. Fainstein, S.S. (2001, December) Competitiveness, Cohesion, and Governance: Their Implications for Social Justice, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol.25.4, pp.884-897. Faintein, S.S. (2000) New Directions in Planning Theory, Urban Affairs Review 35, Vol. 4, pp. 451-479. Harvey, D. (1992) Social Justice, Postmodernism and the City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Reseacrh, Vol. 16, pp. 588-601. Harvey, D. (2000) Co rafya’yı Yeniden cat Etmek, NLR (II) 4, pp.160-190. Huber, E.R. (1971), Modern Endüstri Toplumunda Hukuk Devleti ve Sosyal Devlet (Çev. T. Ansay), Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt XXVII, Sayı 3-4, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara. Innes, E.J. & Booher, E.D. (2002) Network Power in Collaborative Planning, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol.21, pp.221-236. Innes, E.J. (1998) Information in Communicative Planning APA Journal, Vol., pp.52- 63. Jasso, G. (2000) Trend in the Experience of Injustice: Justice Indexes About Earnings in Six Societies, Social Justice Research, Vol.13, Number 2, pp.102-121. King, P. (2000) Housing, Equality and Neutrality , Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Vol.15, pp.115-130. Krumholz, N. (1994) Advocacy Planning: Can it Move the Center?, APA Journal, Vol. 60, Number 2, p.150. Kurtz, H.E. (2003) Scale Frames and Counter-Scale Frames: Constructing The Problem of Environmental Injustice, Political Geography 22, pp.887-916. 206
Lai, C.&Wai, L. (2002) Libertarians on the Road to Town Planning, A Note on the Views of Robert Mundell, Karl Popper, Friedrich Hayek, Robert Nozick, Milton Friedman, and Ronald Coase Towards Polution, TPR, Vol.73(3), pp.289-310. Liu, W.-F. & Chu, C.Y.C. (2001) A Dynamic Charactrization of Rawls’s Maximin Principle : Theory and Implications, Constitutional Political Economy, Vol.12, pp.255-272. Moulaert, F.&Swyngedouw, E.&Rodriguez, A. (2001) Social Polarization in Metropolitan Areas, The Role of New Urban Policy, European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(2), pp.99-102. Mourato, S. & Machado, F. & Atkinson, G. (2000) Balancing Competing Principles of Environmental Equity, Environment and Planning A, Vol.32, pp.1791-1806. Norman, R. (2001) Criteria of Justica: Desert, Needsands and Equality, Res Publica, Vol.7, pp.115-136. Özbek, N. (2002) Osmanlıdan Günümüze Türkiye’de Sosyal Devlet, Toplum ve Bilim, 92 Bahar 2002, pp. 7-33. Özlem, D. (2000a) Hukuk Devletini Sosyal Devlet çinde Dü ünmek, Do u Batı, Number 13, 2000-01/4, pp. 9-25. Özlem, D. (2000b) Ahlak Hukuku Önceler, Felsefe Tartı maları 27. Kitap, pp. 29-45. Payne, G. (2001) Urban Land Tenure Policy Options: Titles or Rights?, Habitat International, Vol.:25, pp.415-429. Prout, J. (1999) Coming to Terms with Environmental Justice, Environmental Justice, Vol.6.4, pp.399-406. Sancar, M. (2000b) iddet, iddet Tekeli ve Demokratik Hukuk Devleti, Do u Batı, Sayı 13 2000-01/4, pp. 25-44. Smith, D. M. (1997) Back to The Good Life: Towards an Enlarged Conception of Social Justice, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 15, pp. 19- 35. Smith, D. M. (2000) Social Justice Revisted, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 32, pp. 1149-1162. Székelyi, M. & Örkény A. (2000) Views on Social Inequality and the Role of the State: Posttransformation Trends in Eastern and Central Europe, Social Justice Research, Vol.13, Number 2, pp.199-218. Talen, E. (1998) Visualizing Fairness Equity Maps For Planners, APA Journal, pp. 22- 37. 207
Page 1 and 2:
A CRITICAL EVALUATION ON THE CONCEP
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to th
Page 5 and 6:
ÖZET Bu tez, Türkiye ehir planlam
Page 7 and 8:
2.3.2.The Attained Principles and R
Page 9 and 10:
4.3.3.Objections to Demolition Deci
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 2.1
Page 13 and 14:
1.1. Aim of the Study CHAPTER 1 INT
Page 15 and 16:
urban space. The considered aspects
Page 17 and 18:
e revealed and defended. The practi
Page 19 and 20:
questions, of which the answers are
Page 21 and 22:
problems in legal process, effects
Page 23 and 24:
taken in 1999 regarding the area in
Page 25 and 26:
c. Municipalities of Balçova and N
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 2 THE FRAMEWORK OF JUSTICE
Page 29 and 30:
concepts is the society’s structu
Page 31 and 32:
c. how the procedures are explained
Page 33 and 34:
society rather than the individual.
Page 35 and 36:
economy approaches encounter. As a
Page 37 and 38:
25 Table 2. 1. The Main Emphasize o
Page 39 and 40:
equal citizenship are taken as sett
Page 41 and 42:
2.3.2. The Attained Principles and
Page 43 and 44:
2. that the liberties shall be rest
Page 45 and 46:
y Rousseau, Locke and Hobbes. Forma
Page 47 and 48:
content “rule of law” is descri
Page 49 and 50:
2.4.3. Liberties and Rights in the
Page 51 and 52:
Second Stage Rights and Liberties;
Page 53 and 54:
sources new arrangements in economi
Page 55 and 56:
ack to the limited contents of mini
Page 57 and 58:
2.5. Spatial Considerations Based o
Page 59 and 60:
specific in its redistributive aims
Page 61 and 62:
giving the heterogenous urban visio
Page 63 and 64:
In this approach that is based on a
Page 65 and 66:
social and economic rights and in t
Page 67 and 68:
the state on public space and the c
Page 69 and 70:
I. Part-In General Principles chapt
Page 71 and 72:
Land ownership and its utilization
Page 73 and 74:
egulations are done with Conservati
Page 75 and 76:
account; the efficient use of resou
Page 77 and 78:
of law and justice and preparing th
Page 79 and 80:
eport among legal regulations enact
Page 81 and 82:
financial resources of administrati
Page 83 and 84:
installments starting from 150 mill
Page 85 and 86:
Table 3. 3. Total Number of Househo
Page 87 and 88:
Results of the studies of two impor
Page 89 and 90:
public services are among the other
Page 91 and 92:
Turkey. Individualistic rights and
Page 93 and 94:
a notice hang at the building and o
Page 95 and 96:
and give them the statue of being l
Page 97 and 98:
important points. First one is shri
Page 99 and 100:
applications. Articles 15 and 16 of
Page 101 and 102:
gecekondu in this law is made as;
Page 103 and 104:
prior subjects in the organizations
Page 105 and 106:
establishing a social balance and g
Page 107 and 108:
3.5.2.2. Limitation of Ownership Ri
Page 109 and 110:
3.5.2.3. Individual, Social and Pub
Page 111 and 112:
In the legal transformations which
Page 113 and 114:
Narlıdere realized in 1992. By thi
Page 115 and 116:
Although not making any decisions o
Page 117 and 118:
Figure 4.1.A. Detail from Balçova
Page 119 and 120:
107 Derived from the data Planning
Page 121 and 122:
4.2. General Evaluation of Actions
Page 123 and 124:
Table 4. 3. All Administrative and
Page 125 and 126:
4.2.1. General Evaluation of the Ac
Page 127 and 128:
115 115
Page 129 and 130:
Table 4.5. All Administrative and J
Page 131 and 132:
119 119
Page 133 and 134:
121 Table: 4.8. Administrative and
Page 135 and 136:
About Subdivision Plans Proceeded i
Page 137 and 138:
12. Narkent Includes the actions br
Page 139 and 140:
Table 4. 9. Administrative and Juri
Page 141 and 142:
Chamber of Architects) and 1 action
Page 143 and 144:
4.3.1. Actions about Expropriation
Page 145 and 146:
decision of zmir-Çe me Highway and
Page 147 and 148:
In the claim of Municipality of Bal
Page 149 and 150:
monetary/moral difficulties and los
Page 151 and 152:
Table 4. 11. Actions of Nullity Pro
Page 153 and 154:
which are defined in legal process,
Page 155 and 156:
accepted the explanation of “havi
Page 157 and 158:
Plans scaled 1/5000 that include Ma
Page 159 and 160:
4. “Decision Amendment Demand”
Page 161 and 162:
Table 4. 42. Distribution of Demoli
Page 163 and 164:
children’s playgrounds, green zon
Page 165 and 166:
shown as a work site in the impleme
Page 167 and 168: court decision will be in favor of
Page 169 and 170: 7. Objection against the rejection
Page 171 and 172: Municipality has repealed its plans
Page 173 and 174: Expert Report: 1. The purpose of th
Page 175 and 176: with the scale of 1/1000 was put in
Page 177 and 178: 2. As the result of the reexaminati
Page 179 and 180: effectiveness of the location of th
Page 181 and 182: located in between the Mithatpa a R
Page 183 and 184: purposes, which is the demand of th
Page 185 and 186: no: 97-98-99 on building block no.6
Page 187 and 188: lands belong to the Treasury”. On
Page 189 and 190: party because documents in court fi
Page 191 and 192: decisions that are passed on the ba
Page 193 and 194: Figure 4. 6. Spatial Distribution o
Page 195 and 196: CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 5.1. General C
Page 197 and 198: 5.2. Results of the Transformation
Page 199 and 200: urban settlers by the urban physica
Page 201 and 202: 5.3. Results of Field Survey In the
Page 203 and 204: also the legal and legitimacy proce
Page 205 and 206: etween Özdilek which carries a pri
Page 207 and 208: career, do not have a common defini
Page 209 and 210: organization in making the most dis
Page 211 and 212: Books: REFERENCES Ackerman, B. A. (
Page 213 and 214: Kele , R. (1994) Yerinden Yönetim
Page 215 and 216: Articles and Papers: Akkar, M. (199
Page 217: Türkçe Sözlük (1974) TDK Yayın
Page 221 and 222: Sivil taatsizlik (1998), Disiplinle
Page 223 and 224: APPENDIX A The Extent of Subject Cl
Page 225 and 226: Personnel Actions for annulment of
Page 227 and 228: APPENDIX B Examination of Actions B
Page 229 and 230: demolition decisions are under the
Page 231 and 232: Explanation of Terms Used in Thesis
Page 233 and 234: APPENDIX E All Collected Data Inclu
Page 235 and 236: Conference Papers and Seminar Prese
show all

a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?