a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
From <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> this <strong>process</strong>; <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r words, from <strong>the</strong><br />
standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> judicial decisi<strong>on</strong>s are viable, any judgement regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> said decisi<strong>on</strong>s were ”fair and just”, can <strong>on</strong>ly be possible through <strong>the</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>evaluati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se decisi<strong>on</strong>s. HENCE, as <strong>the</strong> examples such as<br />
<strong>the</strong> light <strong>in</strong>dustry site, <strong>the</strong> Olympic Houses, Özdilek Tourism Center have shown us,<br />
although <strong>the</strong> court has decided <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> revocati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative procedure, <strong>the</strong><br />
decisi<strong>on</strong>s cannot be implemented.<br />
When <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d approach is taken <strong>in</strong>to c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>;<br />
In an <str<strong>on</strong>g>evaluati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>of</strong> this type developed <strong>in</strong> urban envir<strong>on</strong>ment, it is possible to<br />
elaborate <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g social order and relati<strong>on</strong>s from a <str<strong>on</strong>g>critical</str<strong>on</strong>g> perspective. In such a<br />
case, <strong>in</strong> additi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> positive law, <strong>the</strong> current status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
<strong>the</strong> legal system and <strong>the</strong> society as a whole, can also be reviewed. With this approach, it<br />
is possible to discuss to what extent a legal-social-ec<strong>on</strong>omic framework where <strong>the</strong><br />
def<strong>in</strong>iti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>al rights, acceptance <strong>of</strong> a homogenous social structure,<br />
equality as an abstract c<strong>on</strong>cept, and <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> equal opportunities are disregarded,<br />
is/can be effective <strong>in</strong> an urban envir<strong>on</strong>ment. With<strong>in</strong> this framework, <strong>the</strong> urban-spatial<br />
demands can be evaluated <strong>in</strong> a more comprehensive manner. The acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
assumpti<strong>on</strong> referred to above, stat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> legal <strong>justice</strong> generates “just and fair”<br />
decisi<strong>on</strong>s under “just and fair” c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, can be discussed <strong>in</strong> a new dimensi<strong>on</strong>, when<br />
<strong>the</strong> demands relat<strong>in</strong>g to urban space, are taken up toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> <strong>process</strong>es relat<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
urban space.<br />
180