a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
with <strong>the</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> compensati<strong>on</strong>s (Decisi<strong>on</strong> No: 2001/1096). Compensati<strong>on</strong>s were<br />
paid by Mayoralty accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> taken by <strong>the</strong> local court; however <strong>the</strong>re was<br />
an objecti<strong>on</strong> applicati<strong>on</strong> to Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals regard<strong>in</strong>g this case.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> research by <strong>the</strong> year 2003, after this date <strong>process</strong> has<br />
been pursued accord<strong>in</strong>g to data obta<strong>in</strong>ed from newspapers. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to those data, it is<br />
known that, through October 2004 <strong>the</strong> case was returned to local court by <strong>the</strong> Supreme<br />
Court <strong>of</strong> Appeals and it was transferred to adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court with <strong>the</strong> “decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
n<strong>on</strong>jurisolicti<strong>on</strong>” by <strong>the</strong> local court. At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> this procedure, although <strong>the</strong> case was<br />
not c<strong>on</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court, Mayoralty <strong>of</strong> Narlıdere has started <strong>the</strong><br />
transacti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> order to recover <strong>the</strong> compensati<strong>on</strong> paid to <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff 83 . Basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
case, brought because <strong>of</strong> not tak<strong>in</strong>g necessary security precauti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
<strong>of</strong> Narbel houses <strong>in</strong> 2 nd nönü quarter <strong>in</strong> Narlıdere settlement, depends <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> negligence<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authorities and n<strong>on</strong>realizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> necessary c<strong>on</strong>trol.<br />
2. Sec<strong>on</strong>d case; This acti<strong>on</strong> was brought by a family up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir child<br />
because <strong>of</strong> touch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> electric cables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir balc<strong>on</strong>y <strong>of</strong> an apartment house <strong>in</strong> Akasya<br />
Street, Onur quarter, <strong>in</strong> Municipality <strong>of</strong> Balçova. Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff family brought an acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
compensati<strong>on</strong> for pecuniary loss and mental anguish <strong>in</strong> zmir Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Court<br />
(e.no:2002/1134) aga<strong>in</strong>st TEDA (Turkish Electricity Distributi<strong>on</strong> Co.) and Mayoralty<br />
<strong>of</strong> Balçova. Because <strong>of</strong> limit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> study by <strong>the</strong> year 2003, <strong>the</strong>re is not any data about<br />
<strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> court. However, it is observed that, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong><br />
authority, task and liability between <strong>the</strong> two defendants; Municipality <strong>of</strong> Balçova and<br />
TEDA . Both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s have stated that <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> case has not been<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir task field. Ano<strong>the</strong>r important po<strong>in</strong>t through <strong>the</strong>se statements is;<br />
touch<strong>in</strong>g electric cables was <strong>the</strong> 9 year old child’s own fault and <strong>the</strong> authority can not be<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>sible <strong>of</strong> that event.<br />
3. Third case; This is <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> proceeded <strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court with <strong>the</strong> demand <strong>of</strong><br />
damage payment occurred because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong> a tree near <strong>the</strong> road (e.no:1994/2284).<br />
In this case, Mayoralty <strong>of</strong> Narlıdere as <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff part has started <strong>in</strong> his petiti<strong>on</strong><br />
submitted to <strong>the</strong> court that, <strong>the</strong>ir tasks/liabilities do not <strong>in</strong>clude this subject. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
it has been stated that, subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> court is under <strong>the</strong> Resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities <strong>of</strong> Branch<br />
Directorate <strong>of</strong> Highways. As a result, acti<strong>on</strong> has been c<strong>on</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff<br />
83 Newspaper “Radikal” dated Oct 13, 2004 WEB-14 and WEB-15<br />
176