a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> rejecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> demand for <strong>the</strong> preparati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a development<br />
plan by <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court: The demand submitted by <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party, <strong>the</strong><br />
Foundati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Turkish Medical Doctors c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> preparati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a<br />
development plan for <strong>the</strong> area (located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> quarter <strong>of</strong> Yeniköy) owned by <strong>the</strong><br />
Foundati<strong>on</strong>, was rejected by <strong>the</strong> Balçova Municipality The acti<strong>on</strong> that was <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> rejecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> demand by <strong>the</strong> municipality assembly, was accepted from<br />
<strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party by <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court <strong>in</strong> 2001.<br />
8. Acti<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> plan realized at Narlıdere Municipality by <strong>the</strong><br />
Greater Municipality <strong>of</strong> zmir: On <strong>the</strong> whole, <strong>the</strong>re are five acti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong>itiated with<strong>in</strong> this<br />
c<strong>on</strong>text. Four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se acti<strong>on</strong>s were determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1994; however, it has<br />
not been possible to have access to <strong>the</strong> files c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relevant details. Of <strong>the</strong><br />
rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two acti<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> first <strong>on</strong>e was is c<strong>on</strong>cerned with <strong>the</strong> objecti<strong>on</strong> that was raised<br />
aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> transformati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> residential area that was orig<strong>in</strong>ally c<strong>on</strong>ceived as “A3<br />
arrangement” <strong>in</strong>to “Block-5” arrangement. The litigati<strong>on</strong> that was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1994 was<br />
resolved by a decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court <strong>in</strong> 1995. The c<strong>on</strong>cerned<br />
decisi<strong>on</strong> was approved by <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> State <strong>in</strong> 1996. The sec<strong>on</strong>d legal acti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sists<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> objecti<strong>on</strong> that was raised aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> transformati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> residential areas orig<strong>in</strong>ally c<strong>on</strong>ceived as “A2 arrangement” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development<br />
plans, <strong>in</strong>to “Block Arrangement”. In this acti<strong>on</strong>, which was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1999, and <strong>the</strong><br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court has resolved <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party <strong>in</strong> 2000. The c<strong>on</strong>cerned<br />
resoluti<strong>on</strong> was not brought to <strong>the</strong> attenti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> court <strong>of</strong> appeal.<br />
9. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> transformati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> green z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>in</strong>to a high density residential<br />
area. The pla<strong>in</strong>tiff is not a property owner. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> no follow up was applied <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
litigati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1999, <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court has resolved <strong>in</strong> 2000 that <strong>the</strong><br />
“litigati<strong>on</strong> shall be deemed as not hav<strong>in</strong>g been <strong>in</strong>itiated”.<br />
10. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> modificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan: An objecti<strong>on</strong> was raised by an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual who was not a property owner, aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> reclassificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area as<br />
“Block-5 TM” <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> a change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan by <strong>the</strong> Balçova Municipality. The<br />
litigati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1996 was accepted by <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court <strong>in</strong> 1997, and <strong>the</strong><br />
decisi<strong>on</strong> was approved by <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> State <strong>in</strong> 1999.<br />
11. The cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Revisi<strong>on</strong> Plan developed for <strong>the</strong> Narlıdere- Sahilevleri<br />
Quarters: A total <strong>of</strong> three acti<strong>on</strong>s were <strong>in</strong>itiated regard<strong>in</strong>g this subject matter <strong>in</strong> 1997. In<br />
1998, <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court has resolved <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> revisi<strong>on</strong> plan. The<br />
157