19.07.2013 Views

a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process

a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process

a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

litigati<strong>on</strong> (<strong>the</strong> Quarter <strong>of</strong> Yeniköy). As <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> expert reports, <strong>the</strong> subject matter<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> litigati<strong>on</strong> was accepted from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff <strong>in</strong> 1999, <strong>on</strong> grounds<br />

that <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> allocati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerned municipality service area, was<br />

<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite. The resoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court was approved by <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong><br />

State <strong>in</strong> 2000. The Demand for <strong>the</strong> Revisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Decisi<strong>on</strong> submitted by <strong>the</strong> Narlıdere<br />

Municipality was rejected, and <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerned court resoluti<strong>on</strong> has become f<strong>in</strong>al and<br />

decisive.<br />

4. Cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> secti<strong>on</strong> that rema<strong>in</strong>s with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> road and <strong>the</strong> green z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Peacemeal Plan: The subject matter <strong>of</strong> this acti<strong>on</strong> which was <strong>in</strong>itiated by <strong>the</strong> zmir Chief<br />

Fiscal Authority aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Municipality <strong>of</strong> Narlıdere and <strong>the</strong> Grater Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />

zmir <strong>in</strong> 1997, c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> an objecti<strong>on</strong> raised aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Peacemeal Plan. The objecti<strong>on</strong><br />

that was raised aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> peacemeal plan that envisaged <strong>the</strong> subdivisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area<br />

owned by <strong>the</strong> Treasury (secti<strong>on</strong> 18; block 156; plot 1962 (55,766 m2)) with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> road and <strong>the</strong> green z<strong>on</strong>e, was rejected from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party by <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court <strong>in</strong> 1999. In this resoluti<strong>on</strong>, which was<br />

revoked by <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> State at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> appellate procedure, 200, <strong>the</strong><br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court has decided <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan. The demand for <strong>the</strong><br />

revisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> submitted by <strong>the</strong> Narlıdere Municipality was rejected <strong>in</strong> 2001.<br />

5. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> transformati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blocks that were planned as “A7<br />

arrangement” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development plan with a scale <strong>of</strong> 1/1000, <strong>in</strong>to “Block<br />

Arrangement”: The pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs c<strong>on</strong>sist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> real pers<strong>on</strong>s. There are two acti<strong>on</strong>s with<strong>in</strong><br />

this c<strong>on</strong>text. The subject matter <strong>of</strong> this acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiated by two real pers<strong>on</strong>s liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

area where <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerned acti<strong>on</strong> took place, c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> objecti<strong>on</strong> that is raised<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Narlıdere Municipality c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

improvement plan dated 27.10.1999, numbered 86. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerned legal acti<strong>on</strong><br />

was not <strong>in</strong>itiated with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> specified deadl<strong>in</strong>e subsequent to <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> event<br />

(<strong>in</strong> 2000), it was rejected by <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court by reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statute <strong>of</strong><br />

limitati<strong>on</strong>. The litigati<strong>on</strong> was approved by <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> State up<strong>on</strong> applicati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

6. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> plan and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> land coverage and floor<br />

area ratio: In this acti<strong>on</strong> which was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1999 by <strong>the</strong> Greater Municipality <strong>of</strong><br />

zmir aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Narlıdere Municipality, <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court has resolved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

revok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerned acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2000. The resoluti<strong>on</strong> was approved by <strong>the</strong> Council<br />

<strong>of</strong> State, and <strong>the</strong> Demand for <strong>the</strong> Revisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Resoluti<strong>on</strong> submitted by <strong>the</strong> Narlıdere<br />

Municipality was rejected.<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!