a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
are <strong>the</strong> municipality <strong>of</strong> Balçova and Greater Municipality <strong>of</strong> zmir. The litigati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>process</strong> was f<strong>in</strong>alized <strong>in</strong> 1999, and it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> plans shall be cancelled (i.e.<br />
<strong>the</strong> demands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party were accepted). At <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> appellate review, <strong>the</strong><br />
court <strong>of</strong> appeal has approved <strong>the</strong> resoluti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative courts, and <strong>the</strong><br />
Demand for <strong>the</strong> Revisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court Decisi<strong>on</strong> was rejected.<br />
8. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Demand for <strong>the</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Area that Rema<strong>in</strong>ed outside<br />
<strong>the</strong> Borders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Z<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Expropriati<strong>on</strong> for Dokuz Eylül University (DEÜ) and that<br />
has not been expropriated. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> lot that rema<strong>in</strong>ed bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong> borders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
development area for <strong>the</strong> DEÜ Faculty <strong>of</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e was not expropriated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Master<br />
Plan with a scale <strong>of</strong> 1/5000 was not expropriated, a demand for revisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
development plan was submitted by real pers<strong>on</strong>s. The litigati<strong>on</strong> with <strong>the</strong> demand for <strong>the</strong><br />
repeal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> request that was rejected by <strong>the</strong> Balçova Municipality was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong><br />
2002. The litigati<strong>on</strong> is currently <strong>in</strong> progress.<br />
9. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> rejecti<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> Municipality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> demand c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
amendment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> reclassificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area from <strong>the</strong> school<br />
property to area for rec<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>: This acti<strong>on</strong>, which was <strong>in</strong>itiated by a pla<strong>in</strong>tiff <strong>in</strong><br />
2001, was decided to be resolved <strong>in</strong> favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party.<br />
10. Objecti<strong>on</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Changes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Plan Notes: Amendments have been<br />
<strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> articles 3 and 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan notes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> zmir- Çe me<br />
Highway and <strong>the</strong> Mithatpa a Road. This procedure was rejected by <strong>the</strong> Greater<br />
Municipality <strong>of</strong> zmir. Up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> pass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sistence by <strong>the</strong> Balçova<br />
Municipality, <strong>the</strong> Greater Municipality <strong>of</strong> zmir has applied to court for <strong>the</strong> repeal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>cerned procedure. Ano<strong>the</strong>r acti<strong>on</strong> was <strong>in</strong>itiated by a real pers<strong>on</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same<br />
subject matter <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> same year (2001). The two acti<strong>on</strong>s were f<strong>in</strong>alized by <strong>the</strong><br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istrative court through a resoluti<strong>on</strong> that envisaged partial acceptance (<strong>the</strong><br />
acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amendment <strong>of</strong> Article 7) and partial rejecti<strong>on</strong> (<strong>the</strong> repeal <strong>of</strong> Article 3).<br />
The court resoluti<strong>on</strong> was not submitted to <strong>the</strong> court <strong>of</strong> appeal.<br />
11. Cancellati<strong>on</strong> Of The Change In The Development L<strong>in</strong>e Effected Through Changes<br />
Of The Plan Notes: In <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> that was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1994 by <strong>the</strong> Greater Municipality<br />
<strong>of</strong> zmir, an objecti<strong>on</strong> was raised aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development l<strong>in</strong>e effected by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Balçova Municipality through changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan notes. Balçova Municipality<br />
Assembly has passed decisi<strong>on</strong> for <strong>in</strong>sistence no. 118 <strong>on</strong> 19.10.1994, and <strong>the</strong> demand for<br />
repeal submitted by <strong>the</strong> Greater Municipality <strong>of</strong> zmir was rejected. In <strong>the</strong> litigati<strong>on</strong> that<br />
ensued, it was resolved that <strong>the</strong> change <strong>of</strong> plan shall be repealed (<strong>in</strong> 1995) and that <strong>the</strong><br />
154