a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 4. 42. Distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Demoliti<strong>on</strong> Decisi<strong>on</strong> Results Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Counties<br />
County Result Total<br />
Balçova C<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ues 3<br />
No need to decide because <strong>of</strong> rel<strong>in</strong>quishment 1<br />
Acceptance 9<br />
Partial Acceptance 2<br />
Rejecti<strong>on</strong> 47<br />
Limitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> (durati<strong>on</strong>) 1<br />
Balçova Total 63<br />
Narlıdere No <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> 4<br />
C<strong>on</strong>solidati<strong>on</strong> 1<br />
C<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ues 1<br />
No need to decide because <strong>of</strong> rel<strong>in</strong>quishment 2<br />
No need to decide 1<br />
Acceptance 3<br />
Partial Acceptance 1<br />
Rejecti<strong>on</strong> 64<br />
Narlıdere Total 77<br />
Grand Total 140<br />
As acti<strong>on</strong>s about demoliti<strong>on</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>s have been exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Balçova and<br />
Narlıdere counties <strong>in</strong> general, it has been noticed that, <strong>the</strong>re were 140 acti<strong>on</strong>s and 111<strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se acti<strong>on</strong>s were rejected aga<strong>in</strong>st pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party. As acti<strong>on</strong>s evaluated accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
counties; 47 acti<strong>on</strong>s, through 63 acti<strong>on</strong>s regard<strong>in</strong>g demoliti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Balçova settlement,<br />
were rejected aga<strong>in</strong>st pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party and demoliti<strong>on</strong>s were approved. In Narlıdere<br />
settlement, 64 acti<strong>on</strong>s through 77 acti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> total were rejected aga<strong>in</strong>st pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party<br />
and demoliti<strong>on</strong>s were approved. Numeric values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se acti<strong>on</strong>s show <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> illegal build<strong>in</strong>gs and build<strong>in</strong>gs that were c<strong>on</strong>structed aga<strong>in</strong>st license and its annexes.<br />
4.3.3.1. Demoliti<strong>on</strong> Decisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Balçova<br />
Distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> demoliti<strong>on</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>s taken by Municipality <strong>of</strong> Balçova <strong>in</strong>side<br />
municipal boundaries is as follows:<br />
1. Build<strong>in</strong>gs that were c<strong>on</strong>structed aga<strong>in</strong>st build<strong>in</strong>g license <strong>in</strong> geo<strong>the</strong>rmal protecti<strong>on</strong><br />
area. Property owners exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>side protecti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e (opposite Dokuz Eylül<br />
University Hospital) have objected <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>s by stat<strong>in</strong>g that; <strong>the</strong>ir properties<br />
have been <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e and although <strong>the</strong>y have not been expropriated, <strong>the</strong>y<br />
can not use <strong>the</strong>ir properties. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong>s have c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ued.<br />
149