a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16. In 1999: Özdilek Company applied to zmir No.1 CPCNH <strong>in</strong> order to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> “build<strong>in</strong>gs under c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> that build<strong>in</strong>g license accord<strong>in</strong>g to legal<br />
procedure” stated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple decisi<strong>on</strong> dated 18.06.1999 numbered 648. This<br />
applicati<strong>on</strong> was rejected by <strong>the</strong> committee with <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> dated 16.07.1999 numbered<br />
8067.<br />
17. In 1999: Decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> which had been applied<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Supreme Committee <strong>of</strong> Protecti<strong>on</strong> dated<br />
18.06.1999 numbered 648, was annulled by Municipality <strong>of</strong> Balçova <strong>on</strong> 05.07.1999.<br />
18. In 1999: Özdilek Tourism Management Co. Applied to zmir Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Court<br />
<strong>on</strong> 27.08.1999 by <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial request <strong>in</strong> order to nullify <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g license<br />
cancellati<strong>on</strong> and to stop this procedure.<br />
19. In 2000: 3 th Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Court decided to nullify <strong>the</strong> procedure (by E.no:<br />
1999/606, decisi<strong>on</strong> no: 2000/3/13) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same court where Özdilek Co. has brought <strong>the</strong><br />
suit <strong>of</strong> nullity regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> no. 8050 (E.no: 1999/605). For that reas<strong>on</strong>, by <strong>the</strong><br />
declarati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> “legal support, that c<strong>on</strong>stituted <strong>the</strong> reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legal procedure<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g license, had been removed” and by <strong>the</strong> majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> votes, <strong>the</strong> court decided <strong>the</strong> nullificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> procedure <strong>on</strong> 25.05.2000. Oppos<strong>in</strong>g<br />
vote has claimed <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rejecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> this acti<strong>on</strong>. This oppos<strong>in</strong>g op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong> has<br />
objected <strong>the</strong> transacti<strong>on</strong> which based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> nullificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> procedure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
decisi<strong>on</strong> no. 8050 by stat<strong>in</strong>g “fundamental pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transacti<strong>on</strong> should be <strong>the</strong><br />
announcement <strong>of</strong> natural site and site grad<strong>in</strong>g is not satisfactory to take such a decisi<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g license”.<br />
20. In 2004: C<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>cluded by Özdilek Company and shopp<strong>in</strong>g centre and<br />
hotel enterprise has been operated.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> nullificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Master Plan Change scaled 1/5000<br />
which was brought by Central Office <strong>of</strong> TMMOB Chamber <strong>of</strong> Architects aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
Greater Municipality <strong>of</strong> zmir, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Tourism and M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Public Works and<br />
Settlement, procedure has been developed as follows:<br />
1.TMMOB Central Office <strong>of</strong> Chamber <strong>of</strong> Architects brought an acti<strong>on</strong> to 6 th Council <strong>of</strong><br />
State c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> plan change realised <strong>on</strong> plot basis.<br />
2. 6 th Council <strong>of</strong> State decided to nullify <strong>the</strong> transacti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
3. “Decisi<strong>on</strong> Amendment Demand” was submitted aga<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong> court by <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />
Tourism aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> “nullificati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> transacti<strong>on</strong>” decided by Council <strong>of</strong> State.<br />
146