a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
a critical evaluation on the concept of justice in planning process
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
accepted <strong>the</strong> explanati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> “hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g a natural site” that was<br />
stated <strong>in</strong> expertise reports. By c<strong>on</strong>sider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se statements <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, <strong>the</strong>y have<br />
announced that, subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> is not natural site grad<strong>in</strong>g; subject is whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />
area is a natural site or not.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Culture, as <strong>the</strong> defendant party, has applied for appeal regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
decisi<strong>on</strong>s that nullify <strong>the</strong> procedure and private pers<strong>on</strong>s and companies, as pla<strong>in</strong>tiff<br />
parties, have applied for appeal regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>s that accept <strong>the</strong> procedure.<br />
Decisi<strong>on</strong>s regard<strong>in</strong>g annulment <strong>of</strong> committee’s decisi<strong>on</strong>s has been approved by <strong>the</strong><br />
Council <strong>of</strong> State’s 6 th Government Office; decisi<strong>on</strong>s that accept committee’s decisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
have been appealed and have returned to Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Courts. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
which were appealed and returned to related Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Courts, have been accepted<br />
<strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiff party by Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Courts (appropriate with State <strong>of</strong><br />
Council’s decisi<strong>on</strong>s), which means decisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> committee have been annulled.<br />
Hence, zmir No.1 Committee <strong>of</strong> Protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cultural and Natural Heritage<br />
nullified <strong>the</strong>ir Decisi<strong>on</strong> No 8050 <strong>in</strong> Balçova County <strong>on</strong> 17.12.2003 and made <strong>the</strong> new<br />
Decisi<strong>on</strong> No.10168 and nullified <strong>the</strong>ir Decisi<strong>on</strong> No.8049 <strong>in</strong> Narlıdere County and made<br />
<strong>the</strong> new Decisi<strong>on</strong> No.10169. These decisi<strong>on</strong>s have renewed 1 st degree, 2 nd degree, 3 rd<br />
degree natural site boundaries <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Çakalburnu Dalyan and surrounded<br />
by zmir-Çe me Highway. Property owners have begun to make objecti<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> courts<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g also <strong>the</strong>se new decisi<strong>on</strong>s. Dur<strong>in</strong>g research period between Dec 2003 – Jan<br />
2004i number <strong>of</strong> acti<strong>on</strong>s brought for <strong>the</strong> annulment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Decisi<strong>on</strong> No.10168 has<br />
already been 6 cases. Objecti<strong>on</strong>s claim that, decisi<strong>on</strong>s are not just, are not appropriate<br />
with law and <strong>the</strong>y should be annulled. These acti<strong>on</strong>s have not been c<strong>on</strong>cluded yet and<br />
<strong>the</strong>y still c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ue.<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong> to acti<strong>on</strong>s/c<strong>on</strong>flicts that reflect <strong>on</strong> legal <strong>process</strong>; <strong>the</strong>re are also legal<br />
organizati<strong>on</strong>s which are parties <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>evaluati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>s regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> area but exist out <strong>of</strong><br />
legal <strong>process</strong>. These are <strong>the</strong> organizati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> city base and different civil<br />
community organizati<strong>on</strong>s. zmir branches <strong>of</strong> chambers <strong>of</strong> TMMOB, Faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
Architecture, Chamber <strong>of</strong> Architects zmir Branch, Chamber <strong>of</strong> City Planners zmir<br />
Branch are some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se organizati<strong>on</strong>s. Discussi<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cern<strong>in</strong>g future <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area,<br />
which reflect <strong>on</strong> legal <strong>process</strong> as objecti<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong> taken <strong>in</strong> 1999 by <strong>the</strong><br />
committee <strong>of</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong>, has started <strong>in</strong> 1995. Different demands <strong>of</strong> different urban<br />
143