19.07.2013 Views

May - Library

May - Library

May - Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>May</strong><br />

Editorial<br />

The annual survey of Computerised Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS)<br />

has generated almost 50 responses. The systems include small to large, with costs of<br />

$2000 to millions of dollars. There has to be at least one of those systems that meets<br />

most of your CMMS requirements.<br />

One article in this issue is by your MJ editor. In my 20 years of examining,<br />

implementing and using CMMS I have seen dramatic changes in their ease of use,<br />

flexibility and functionality. My article touches on some of those improvements of<br />

recent years. However I have observed in the past that the best users of CMMS did<br />

not necessarily use the best CMMS systems. So what factors do help create the best<br />

users of CMMS systems?<br />

There are two articles on how we may better display maintenance related data via<br />

Jack-Knife Diagrams (with Mining Plant examples) and Honeycomb Maps (US<br />

Marine Corps). One allows the display of multiple parameter maintenance<br />

performance data for an asset. The other uses a single image to display the state of<br />

readiness for use and significance of multiple asset types.<br />

I also have a particular interest in John Wi l s o n ’s article on the Po s t - C o n s t r u c t i o n<br />

Maintenance of Infrastructure Assets - or the lack of it. I spent many years on various<br />

aid projects in developing countries. Big budgets for the construction phase but little<br />

for ongoing maintenance.<br />

In the first quarter of 2004 Philip Higgs conducted a Survey of Condition Monitoring<br />

Systems in Industry. A summary report on the results of that Survey are included in<br />

this issue.<br />

A new regular feature has been added to the Maintenance Journal - the “Planned<br />

Maintenance Corner”. Each issue will include a Condition Monitoring routine for a<br />

particular plant type, this issue features a CM routine for a Screw Conveyor.<br />

SURVEY FEATURE<br />

in the October<br />

2004 issue<br />

Survey of<br />

Special Maintenance<br />

Applications Software<br />

The SMAS survey provides a listing<br />

and details of Maintenance software<br />

products such as for RCM, Failure<br />

Analysis. FMEA, LCC, Simulation,<br />

PM Optimisation, Weibull Analysis,<br />

Parts Optimisation, Plant Replacement<br />

software, etc.<br />

If your organisation wishes to be<br />

included in the SMAS survey for 2004,<br />

then you may obtain the appropriate<br />

survey form by contacting Ian<br />

Bradshaw at<br />

mail@maintenancejournal.com<br />

The completed survey forms must<br />

be returned by 2nd July 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!